Male Reproductive Skew Is Higher in Bonobos Than Chimpanzees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Male Reproductive Skew Is Higher in Bonobos Than Chimpanzees Current Biology Magazine Correspondence receptivity and attractiveness are 2007 and 2013, the time period more extended in bonobos [2], males for which we sampled all potential Male reproductive compete less intensely for each mating sires, in the Bompusa community of opportunity. This would reduce the bonobos at LuiKotale, Democratic skew is higher strength of selection for traits that lead Republic of the Congo. Skew was to success in direct contest competition calculated from published paternity in bonobos than between males and in sexual coercion data from 41 temporally overlapping chimpanzees of females, thus increasing the potential 7-year time periods in fi ve chimpanzee for female choice [3]. Accordingly, it communities, which represented a total has been predicted that the infl uence of of 191 paternities occurring over 70 Martin Surbeck1,6,*, male dominance rank on reproductive independent chimpanzee community- 2,3,6, Kevin E. Langergraber *, success and the extent of male years (Table 1). Nonac’s binomial skew Barbara Fruth4,5, Linda Vigilant1 reproductive skew should be lower (B) index [6], where –1 indicates an equal and Gottfried Hohmann1 in bonobos than in chimpanzees [1]. distribution of reproduction, 0 a random Although relevant for understanding distribution, and 1 total monopolization The two closest living relatives of the evolution of the unusual levels of by one individual, was higher in bonobos humans, bonobos (Pan paniscus) and egalitarianism and cooperation found in (0.22) than in any chimpanzee period chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), share human hunter-gatherers [4], comparative (range: –0.03–0.14, mean: 0.03; Table 1). many traits that are common in humans analyses in the genus Pan have been The percentage of paternities achieved but rare in other mammals, including limited by the scanty paternity data by the most reproductively successful societies with high fi ssion–fusion available for wild bonobos [5]. Here, male was also higher in bonobos (62%) dynamics, male philopatry, female we show using the largest sample of than in any chimpanzee 7-year period dispersal and extensive social bonding paternity data available that, contrary (range: 7–56%, mean = 26%; Table 1). among unrelated individuals [1]. The to expectation, male bonobos have a We also calculated skew in bonobos major difference between these two higher reproductive skew and a stronger after extending the analysis to a 12-year species is that male aggression is more relationship between dominance period (2002–2013) where we had a frequent and intense in male-dominated rank and reproductive success than larger sample of genotyped offspring chimpanzees than in bonobos, where chimpanzees. (n = 24) but lacked genotypes from the highest-ranking individuals are We compared skew in bonobos an estimated one to three candidate female [1]. One potential explanation is using paternities for 13 offspring sire males present at the beginning that because periods of female sexual conceived in the seven years between (2002 – 2006). Even if we assume Table 1. Overview of male reproductive competition in one bonobo (bold) and fi ve chimpanzee communities over 7-year and 12-year time periods. Average Most Number Average rank Time number of Number of Nonac’s B successful Species Community of time of sires period males per paternitiesa indexa sire’s sharea periods (95% C.I.) conceptiona [%] 2007– 0.81 Bonobos Bompusa 1 7.4 13 0.22 62 2013 (0.63–0.95) 1987– 6.3 10.5 0.09 51 0.77 Chimpanzees Taï North 2 1994 (6.1–6.5) (10–11) (0.07–0.11) (45–56) (0.60–0.91) 1985– 11.6 12 0.05 31 0.65 Chimpanzees Kasakela 21 7-year 2011 (11.3–12.3) (8–16) (-0.03–0.14) (13–45) (0.53–0.76) periods 1999– 0.91 Chimpanzees M group 1 11.6 11 0.06 36 2005 (0.84–0.97) 1993– 16.0 11 0.01 34 0.80 Chimpanzees Sonso 4 2002 (15.7–16.2) (11–11) (0.01–0.02) (27–36) (0.66–0.91) 1996– 41.8 42 0.01 11 0.66 Chimpanzees Ngogo 13 2014 (40.2–43.9) (30–54) (0–0.02) (7–13) (0.62–0.71) 2002– Bonobos Bompusa 1 - 23 0.08 39 - 2013 12-year 1996– 72.3 0.01 7 Chimpanzees Ngogo 8- - periods 2014 (62–80) (0.00–0.01) (6–8) 1985– 20.7 0.04 27 Chimpanzees Kasakela 16 - - 2011 (15–25) (-0.01–0.12) (16–41) avalues represent the average across all time periods for each group and the values in brackets indicate the range of values of all time periods for each group. R640 Current Biology 27, R623–R641, July 10, 2017 © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. Current Biology Magazine that all 3 offspring with unassigned lower estrous synchrony among females ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS paternity were sired by different does not appear to explain the stronger ungenotyped males, the B-index was infl uence of dominance rank on male Thanks to C. Rowney and A. Nicklisch for still higher in bonobos (0.083) than in reproductive success in bonobos than in performing genetics lab work, to R. Mundry all but two of 24 12-year periods in chimpanzees. for statistical advice, to P. L. Hooper and two chimpanzees (range = -0.010–0.123, If not an effect of the numbers of reviewers for helpful comments. The Congolese wildlife authority (ICCN) gave permission to mean = 0.028; Table 1). Additionally, competing males or simultaneously conduct fi eld research and export fecal samples the most successful male’s share of receptive females, how did high- for genotyping. Funding for bonobo fi eld and reproduction, which is unaffected by the ranking males more effectively genetics research was provided by the Max presence of ungenotyped males, was monopolize reproduction in bonobos Planck Society, the National Geographic Society higher in bonobos (39%) than in all but than chimpanzees? One possibility is and the Wenner-Gren Foundation. M.S. was 1 of 24 chimpanzee 12-year periods that higher levels of male aggression partially supported by SNF. K.E.L. is supported by (range = 6–41%, mean = 20%; Table 1). in chimpanzees actually decrease NIH RO1AG049395 and Arizona State University Comparative research in group- reproductive skew. Although rank and President’s Strategic Initiative Fund. The authors living primates indicates that male sexual coercion are positively correlated have no fi nancial confl icts of interest that reproductive skew is high when the in male chimpanzees, coercion by infl uence the results or interpretations contained number of competing males is low low-ranking males may also result in this paper. [7]. However, this does not appear in paternities that are unavailable for to explain why skew was higher in low-ranking bonobos [9]. Within-group REFERENCES bonobos than chimpanzees. Although infanticide also appears to be absent in 1. Hare, B., Wobber, V., and Wrangham, R. (2012). The we found that the chimpanzee periods bonobos. The need to confuse paternity self-domestication hypothesis: Evolution of bonobo with skew values most similar to those through promiscuous mating may thus psychology is due to selection against aggression. of bonobos also had a small average lower for female bonobos. Rather, the Anim. Behav. 83, 573–585. 2. Douglas, P.H., Hohmann, G., Murtagh, R., Thiessen- number of males present at the time low levels of sexual coercion and the Bock, R., and Deschner, T. (2016). Mixed messages: of each conception (Table 1), both the comparatively higher dominance of wild female bonobos show high variability in the timing of ovulation in relation to sexual swelling B-index and the most successful male’s female bonobos may allow them to patterns. BMC Evol. Biol. 16, 1–17. share of reproduction for bonobos were selectively mate with high-ranking males 3. Furuichi, T. (1992). The prolonged estrus of females outside the 95% confi dence intervals of during periods when they are likely to and factors infl uencing mating in wild groups of bonobos (Pan paniscus) in Wamba, Zaire. In the model prediction for a chimpanzee conceive, thereby gaining ‘good genes’ Topics in Primatology. 2. Behavior, Ecology, and community with the same number or some other benefi ts [10]. A further, Conservation, Y. Itoigawa, Y. Sugiyama, G. P. Sackett, and R. Thompson, eds. (University of of competing males (Supplemental non-exclusive possibility is that the Tokyo Press), pp. 179–190. information). more cohesive society of bonobos, with 4. Boehm, C. (2012). Moral Origins: Social Selection Male reproductive skew was parties consisting of a higher proportion and the Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame (New York: Basic Books). higher in bonobos than chimpanzees of the total community, makes it easier 5. Gerloff, U., Hartung, B., Fruth, B., Hohmann, G., because high-ranking bonobo for high-ranking males to monopolize and Tautz, D. (1999). Intracommunity relationships, dispersal pattern and paternity success in a wild males more effectively monopolized reproduction, as it limits the use of living community of Bonobos (Pan paniscus) reproduction. The average standardized alternative mating strategies that low- determined from DNA analysis of faecal samples. dominance ranks of sires was higher in ranking male chimpanzees use, such Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 266, 1189–1195. 6. Nonacs, P. (2000). Measuring and using skew in the bonobos (0.81) than in four out of fi ve as sneaky copulation or consortship. In study of social behavior and evolution. Am. Nat. chimpanzee communities (mean = 0.77, addition to conducting paternity studies 156, 577–589. 7. Ostner, J., Nunn, C.L., and Schulke, O. (2008). range = 0.65–0.91). According to the in other bonobo groups to establish the Female reproductive synchrony predicts skewed priority-of-access model, the infl uence generality of our results, an important paternity across primates.
Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bonobo and Me
    THE BONOBO AND ME - COMPARING FAMILY TREES A PICTORIAL PRESENTATION With Marian Brickner A Campus Outreach Program in Science Education In cooperation with The University of Missouri-St. Louis Grade Level: Pre K-6 Pre-Visit Activities: Discuss what a family tree is and help students construct one of their family if possible. Presentation Time Period: Varies from 30-60 minutes as wanted. Materials: 1. A black “portfolio” case with several pictures 13 x 19, several 8 x 10's 2. A round “circular portfolio” case with a 5-foot U.S. map with ribbons on it showing where zoos are located that have Bonobo families. 3. Life size portrait of an adult Bonobo. 4. A weighted chain the average length of an adult male Bonobo (119cm) and one for the average adult female (111cm). 5. Large globe. 6. Skeletal hands, feet and skull replicas of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and Bonobo (Pan paniscus). 7. One weight of 2 1/2 pounds and one 7 pounds. Introduction to Presentation: “Hi, I am Marian Brickner, a photographer. I am working on a book about a Bonobo family tree. Today I will introduce you to a family you may never have met yet.” Has anyone heard of a Bonobo? What do you think a Bonobo might be? What can you tell me about them? “Bonobos are one of the Great Apes.” Who can tell me an example of a great ape? “Scientists call them by their scientific name Pan paniscus.” What is the scientific name of human beings? Historical Perspective: “I have been following the family of a Bonobo named Linda.” (Show picture of Linda.) “Linda lives in Milwaukee and was born in 1956 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, (Zaire) Africa in the central Congo Basin.” If she was born in 1956, how old is Linda today? Can anyone show me on the globe where she came from? Where do we live? “Linda has seven children, five girls and two boys.
    [Show full text]
  • LING 001 Introduction to Linguistics
    LING 001 Introduction to Linguistics Lecture #6 Animal Communication 2 02/05/2020 Katie Schuler Announcements • Exam 1 is next class (Monday)! • Remember there are no make-up exams (but your lowest exam score will be dropped) How to do well on the exam • Review the study guides • Make sure you can answer the practice problems • Come on time (exam is 50 minutes) • We MUST leave the room for the next class First two questions are easy Last time • Communication is everywhere in the animal kingdom! • Human language is • An unbounded discrete combinatorial system • Many animals have elements of this: • Honeybees, songbirds, primates • But none quite have language Case Study #4: Can Apes learn Language? Ape Projects • Viki (oral production) • Sign Language: • Washoe (Gardiner) (chimp) • Nim Chimpsky (Terrace) (chimp) • Koko (Patterson) (gorilla) • Kanzi (Savage-Rumbaugh) (bonobo) Viki’s `speech’ • Raised by psychologists • Tried to teach her oral language, but didn’t get far... Later Attempts • Later attempts used non-oral languages — • either symbols (Sarah, Kanzi) or • ASL (Washoe, Koko, Nim). • Extensive direct instruction by humans. • Many problems of interpretation and evaluation. Main one: is this a • miniature/incipient unbounded discrete combinatorial system, or • is it just rote learning+randomness? Washoe and Koko Video Washoe • A chimp who was extensively trained to use ASL by the Gardners • Knew 132 signs by age 5, and over 250 by the end of her life. • Showed some productive use (‘water bird’) • And even taught her adopted son Loulis some signs But the only deaf, native signer on the team • ‘Every time the chimp made a sign, we were supposed to write it down in the log… They were always complaining because my log didn’t show enough signs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Conservation Strategy 2012–2022 About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature- based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with more than 1,200 government and NGO Members and almost 11,000 volunteer experts in some 160 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by over 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. IUCN Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of 8,000 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. www.iucn.org/themes/ssc IUCN Species Programme The IUCN Species Programme supports the activities of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and individual Specialist Groups, as well as implementing global species conservation initiatives. It is an integral part of the IUCN Secretariat and is managed from IUCN’s international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Bonobo Have a (Chimpanzee-Like) Theory of Mind?
    Chapter 6 Does the bonobo have a (chimpanzee-like) theory of mind? Christopher Krupenye, Evan L. MacLean and Brian Hare Abstract Theory of mind—the ability to reason about the thoughts and emotions of others—is central to what makes us hu- man. Chimpanzees too appear to understand some psychological states. While less is known about bonobos, several lines of evi- dence suggest that the social-cognitive abilities of the two sister taxa may differ in key respects. This chapter outlines a framework to guide future research on bonobo social cognition based on the predictions of two potentially complementary hypotheses. The self-domestication hypothesis suggests that selection against aggression and for prosociality in bonobos may have impacted the on- togeny of their social-cognitive skills relative to chimpanzees. The empathizing–systemizing hypothesis links degree of prenatal brain masculinization, a potential result of self-domestication, to adult cognition. Specifically, relative feminization may yield more flexible theory of mind skills in bonobos than chimpanzees. Finally, directions for future study, including development of new paradigms that maximize ecological validity for bonobos, are discussed. La théorie de l’esprit—le pouvoir de raisonner les pensées et émotions des autres—est centrale à notre nature humaine. Il parait que les chimpanzés peuvent comprendre quelques états psychologiques. Tandis que nous savons moins des bonobos, plusieurs té- moignages suggèrent que les capacités socio-­cognitives des deux taxons soeur peuvent différer dans des aspects clefs. Nous traçons un cadre pour guider les prochaines recherches sur la cognition sociale des bonobos, basé sur les prédictions de deux hypothèses potentiellement complémentaires.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonobo Food Items, Food Availability and Bonobo Distribution in the Lake
    14 The Open Conservation Biology Journal, 2009, 3, 14-23 Open Access Bonobo Food Items, Food Availability and Bonobo Distribution in the Lake Tumba Swampy Forests, Democratic Republic of Congo Bila-Isia Inogwabini*,1,2 and Bewa Matungila2 1Durrell Institute for Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, UK; 2World Wide Fund for Nature, DRC Program Abstract: Data on food items were collected from the Lac Tumba Swampy Forests (LTSF) with the objective to gauge the effect of food type and availability on the distribution of the bonobos. Bonobos at the LTSF feed on at least 61 plant species and eat more Terrestrial Herbaceous Vegetation (THV) than at other sites (t = 0.676, df = 3, p = 0.548 > 0.05; in- significant). Fruits were available for most of the year at sites within the LTSF. At the Mbou-Mon-Tour (MMT), a site with higher bonobo density, the mean density of 1.42 fruits/m2 per month (range 0.62 – 3.82 fruits/m2 per month) was re- corded, higher than in other sites where bonobos occur (general univariate linear model = 0.422, t = 1.543, df = 11, p = 0.151, non-significant). In-site differences between MMT and other sub-sites in the LTSF were significant (t = 2.793, df = 12, p = 0.016 < 0.05). Fruit abundance in the LTSF ( X =138 fruits/km, SD = 13.80) was higher than in the Salonga Na- tional Park (SNP) ( X =83 fruits/km, SD = 6.49). There were five species of THV in the LTSF, with the most abundant being Megaphrynium macrostachyum (41.18%), which was scarce in the Lomako Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Hominidae Family Tree
    Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial || Student Handout Hominidae Family Tree This is a phylogenetic tree, which is a hypothesis of This tree also includes information about the number the evolutionary history of a group of organisms. This of chromosomes for each species. What do you notice tree is known as the Hominidae family tree. It was about the similarities and differences in number of created by comparing the DNA sequences of humans, chromosomes among the species in this family? If chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans. humans and chimpanzees share an extinct common Each juncture in the tree represents when a species ancestor, why do they have a different number of is estimated to have branched off. For example, the chromosomes? With your team members, develop chimp and bonobo have the most recent common two hypotheses that—given a hypothetical extinct extinct ancestor, some three million years ago. The common ancestor—would explain why humans and next-most-recent common extinct ancestor—the one chimpanzees have a different number of chromo- shared by chimpanzees and humans—is at about six somes. Include in your hypotheses how many million years ago. chromosomes you think an extinct common ancestor would have had. Write your hypotheses on a separate sheet of paper. Orangutan Gorilla Chimpanzee Bonobo Human 48 chromosomes 48 chromosomes 48 chromosomes 48 chromosomes 46 chromosomes (24 pairs) (24 pairs) (24 pairs) (24 pairs) (23 pairs) Present Extinct common ancestor of chimpanzee and bonobo 3 million years ago 6 million years ago Extinct common ancestor of chimpanzees (including bonobo) and human 8 million years ago Extinct common ancestor of gorilla, chimpanzees, and human Extinct common ancestor of orangutan, gorilla, chimpanzees, and human Foundation 13 million years ago Educational WGBH Note: Dates are based on genomic analysis and are approximate.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Communication & Language
    9781446295649_C.indd 6 14/06/2017 17:18 00_CARPENDALE ET AL_FM.indd 3 11/14/2017 4:45:07 PM Animal Communication and Human 7 Language LEARNING OUTCOMES By the end of this chapter you should: • Understand how the study of animal communication informs us about the nature and sophistication of human communication. • Be able to discuss the details of the communication patterns of vervet monkeys and honeybees. • Know that attempts to teach apes to speak have been conducted for a hundred years and why those based on behavioural training were inconclusive. • Be able to define what a LAD and a LASS are (and know their theoretical differences). • Be able to discuss the differences between human and animal communication and therefore the complexity of the latter. • Be aware of how more recent training programmes based on social interaction have changed our understanding of how apes may learn to communicate with humans as well as how they have informed our understanding of children’s early language development. Do animals use languages? Can dogs learn words? Rico, a 9-year-old border collie, was able to learn 200 words (Kaminski, Call, & Fischer, 2004). But are these really words in the same sense that humans use them? What Rico had learned was to fetch 200 different 07_CARPENDALE ET AL_CH_07.indd 121 11/14/2017 10:48:26 AM 122 THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN’S THINKING objects (Bloom, 2004). This is an incredibly impressive feat, but what does it tell us about human languages? When a child learns a word, more is expected than the ability to fetch the object that it identifies.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2016
    NewsISSN-1040-3027, Vol. 43, No. 2 September 2016 INSIDE: ♦ Welcome Paen! ♦ The Birth of IPPL ♦ Better Protection for Barbary Macaques In This Issue: Page IPPL Welcomes Paen 3 The Birth of IPPL 5 Dear IPPLA Friend, Note from Shirley Farewell Kendra 8 Gibbon Picnics 9 This summer was the hottest ever in South Carolina. It went over 100 degrees A Safe Way to Drive Away Monkeys! 10 Fahrenheit (37.7 centigrade) for many days. Fortunately, we have air-conditioning 2016 Animal Rights National Conference 11 in the indoor gibbon houses and the gibbons always have indoor access. It was Better protection for Barbary Macaques 13 tough on our gallant animal care staff, but all accomplished their tasks and still IPPL’s Beautiful, Busy Dogs! 15 work with us. Animal Care Team Member Story 16 In recent months we received several new gibbons, one an ex-pet and the rest older 17 animals from zoo backgrounds. The latest arrival, Paen, was one of three sisters. Special Thanks to IPPL Supporters Sister 1 died, then Sister 2. Poor Paen was left alone and transferred to IPPL, where Matching Gifts 18 she is doing very well (See “IPPL Welcomes Paen,” page 3, this issue). Special Gifts 19 We are very happy that our part-time grounds manager, Henry Ancrum, became IPPL News a full-time employee in 2016. He is an excellent self-directed employee, very hard- working and he always has a happy smile on his face. In his spare time, Henry is a EXECUTIVE EDITOR .....Shirley McGreal MANAGING EDITOR .......Joan Brooks dynamic jazz drummer.
    [Show full text]
  • Declarations
    Declarations 1. Jocelyn Bezner, DVM, Save the Chimps 2. Laura Bonar, RN, Animal Protection of New Mexico 3. G.A. Bradshaw, PhD, The Kerulos Center 4. Theodora Capaldo, EdD, The New England Anti-Vivisection Society 5. Jen Feuerstein, Save the Chimps 6. Gloria Grow, Fauna Foundation 7. Margaret Peppercorn, MD 8. Senator Robert C. Smith 9. Vernon Reynolds, PhD 10. Desmond Morris, PhD 11. Jarrod Bailey, PhD 12. Nancy Megna Re: PETITION FOR RULEMAKING ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ) & HUMAN SERVICES ) ) TO SET CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING WHEN ) CHIMPANZEES ARE NO LONGER NEEEDED FOR ) RESEARCH AND MUST BE RETIRED AND SENT TO ) SANTUARY AS REQUIRED BY THE CHIMPANZEE ) HEALTH IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND ) PROTECTION ACT ) Declaration of Jocelyn Bezner, VMD 1. I am submitting this declaration in support of the above referenced Rulemaking Petition—my expert opinion is based on my 26 years of veterinary experience, nearly half of which have been focused on chimpanzees predominantly from research who are now in sanctuary. 2. I received my veterinary medical degree from the University of Pennsylvania Veterinary School in 1986. I am the senior veterinarian at Save the Chimps Sanctuary. For the past 10 years I have provided full time veterinary care for over 270 retired research chimpanzees. In addition, I have consulted on and worked with chimpanzees from other labs who are now retired in other private sanctuaries. A copy of my curriculum vitae is attached. 3. I am very familiar with the physiological and psychological problems these chimpanzees face. I respectfully request that the Secretary of Health and Human Services consider my extensive knowledge and opinion when fulfilling her responsibility to formulate and oversee the application of criteria for when a chimpanzee should be released from research.
    [Show full text]
  • About Primates!
    ALL ABOUT PRIMATES! Gorilla World and Jungle Trails WHAT IS A PRIMATE? Primates are a taxonomical Order of related species that fall under the Class Mammalia Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Primates From here primates tend to fall into 3 major categories THE THREE PRIMATE CATEGORIES Prosimians Monkeys Apes PROSIMIANS Prosimians represent the more “primitive” of primates General Characteristics: Small Size Nocturnal Well-developed sense of smell Relatively Solitary Vertical Clingers and Leapers This group includes all lemurs, galagos, lorises, and tarsiers MONKEYS Monkeys are the most geographically diverse category of primates, spanning throughout South and Central America, Africa, Asia, and even one location in Europe General Characteristics Long Tails Diurnal (one exception) Increased sense of sight More complex social structures Increased Intelligence Quadrupedal Monkeys are classified as either New World or Old World NEW WORLD VS. OLD WORLD MONKEYS New World Monkeys span Old World Monkeys span throughout Central and throughout Europe, Africa, and South America. Asia. Characteristics: Round, flat Characteristics: Narrow, nostrils. Smaller in size. downward nostrils. Larger in Exclusively arboreal. Some size. Some terrestrial. Sitting have prehensile tails. pads, Some have cheek pouches. APES Apes are often known as the most “advanced” group of primates General Characteristics No Tail Large in size Broad Chests Move through brachiation High intelligence Dependence on learning and tool use This group includes
    [Show full text]
  • Article on Animals in the Zoo
    Article On Animals In The Zoo Hewitt is numerate and anastomoses perforce as staple Tadeas outbargain obstinately and hung brashly. Paediatric Sydney reprehends no gunpowders exports densely after Elbert shreddings measuredly, quite manoeuvrable. Convoluted Joao engrave: he swatted his gormands affably and taciturnly. Articles describing supposedly lonely zoo animals who miss their human friends often seem designed to bring this little levity to readers during. Erin grew up photographs from each is decked out of podcasts like to assess and social? Full article Visitors' Effects on the gates of Animals in the. All animals in article about conservation benefit to find a pacing up! Or on zoo animals involves tremendous suffering. Want your students to discuss Above the Noise videos with peers from around the country? Should animals in zoo is in the month following a serious public about your classroom resources? Do animals die faster in zoos? Thank you sure you know what the article animals on zoo in the enclosures with visitors? New Orleans, Louisiana, is decked out for Mardi Gras. When zoos in. Furthermore, Davey proposes that new quality rigorous research studies can be improved to shift a clearer picture surrounding the factors influencing animal behavior. Another one country faces in article is, some other animal folded along lower level, female african elephant habitat loss. Essay on exterior for Students and Children 500 Words Essay. Luis trained to reduce spam, of zoo we understand that is the zoo animals, director manages and doers who went missing human? Dilemmas for grey Living Concepts of poison Animal Welfare. The magician card represents a case for signing up that animal might be available for zoos are seeing the young, and reintroduction projects for science and specials.
    [Show full text]