DOCSLIB.ORG

The Balkan Wars 1912-13’ Nov

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Balkan Wars 1912-13’ Nov Studying the Ottomans: Section 2: Ottomans in the Modern World (19th -early 20th C.) Revolution in the Caliphate: conflict, refugees and challenges to survival ‘The Balkan Wars 1912-13’ Nov. 19-21 Balkan Wars 1912-13 Crisis in the Balkans 1912-13 (also origin WWI 1914): - ‘roots’ in Treaty of Berlin (1878) [Week Oct. 22-26, Additional Rdgs] - conference chaired by Bismark (newly unified Germany) to establish his value as ‘new player’ in European game imperialism - ‘mediated’ between Russia (had established several puppet states in Balkans as consequence of 19th c. wars against Ottomans) and…. Balkan Wars 1912-13 …. And European Powers (worrying about degree to which Russian victories over Ottomans posed threat to them: ‘balance of power’ issues…) - Balkan states ‘parceled out like prizes at gigantic raffle party’ [Quataert] - Quataert points to importance in terms of showing European Power to carve up maps irrespective of peoples’ culture, ethnicity, religion, language Balkan Wars 1912-13 - Bulgaria: ‘autonomous’ but ‘tributary principality’ under the Sultan, with a Christian government, militia - Bosnia, Herzegovina: occupied, administered by Austria-Hungary who has right to garrisons, military and commercial roads BUT remained ‘vilayet of Bosnia’ in Ottoman Empire - Montenegro, Serbia, Romania ‘independent’: but with specific conditions regarding respect for different religions (worship, public employment etc); Romania lost Bessarabia to Russia Balkan Wars 1912-13 - full significance not seen until those thusly ‘managed’ (Balkan States and Ottoman empire who had been left in nominal control Bosnia, Herzogovinia) ‘reacted’ in wake of 1908 Revolution - generations late 19th-turn-of-20th C. lived in uncertain, unstable situation of poorly defined ‘national’ territories, ambiguous terms of influence and control between ‘Europe’ ‘Russians’ and ‘Ottomans’ – more volatile then ever before Balkan Wars of Independence Balkan Wars: - 1912 Greece (independent from 19th C.), Bulgaria, Serbia, Montenegro: all declared war on Ottomans - intention seize (divide among them) remaining Ottoman lands in ‘European’ territory: esp. Macedonia - took advantage of unstable ‘Young Turk’ regime (‘counter revolution’, 1909; followed by revolt in Albania, 1910; and Italian occupation (and successful defense) of Tripoli, North Africa, 1911) Main Area to be “Divided” as spoils following War NO AGREEMENT AS TO HOW! Balkan Wars 1912-13 Videos on Balkan Wars: - first (focusing on Macedonia) meant to give sense of complex situation, especially how Ottoman rule (‘the Turks’) had used religion to cross-cut language, ethnicity, culture [map ‘Ethnic Regions’, below] - second moves into ‘geopolitical’ aspects of lead up to First Balkan War (1912) - third (brief) completes that story of ‘united front’ against Ottomans [links in ‘Additional Readings’] Ethnic ‘Regions’ of Ottoman Empire c.1911 Balkan Wars 1912-13 - ultimate ‘victory’ against Ottomans (1913) did not end war, however - ‘victors’ fought each other (‘Second Balkan War), continued to involve Ottomans “Peace came late in 1913, and all that was left of the Ottoman Empire in Europe was a little under 11,0000 square miles of territory. A year later WWI began…” [Arjami & Ricks, 174,5] Ottoman Soldiers, Balkan War 1912 Mevlevi Turkish [sufi association] Cavalry, (above) Battalion Infantry (Played key role in (right) re-taking of Edirne) Greek Army Corps with Cannon, 1912 Bulgarian Army Digging Trenches, Siege of Adrianople 1912 Balkan Wars of Independence Earlier 19th c. practice ‘consolidating nationalism’ through murder and expulsion (Greece, Serbia) repeated: - Muslim villages, town quarters destroyed - refugees fled - joined by persecuted Jews - European observers estimated about half never reached sanctuary Balkan Wars of Independence A Serbian Example: - Serbian-orchestrated massacres Albanians, other Muslims in Kosovo and Macedonia: soon discovered by the press - not only the Hapsburgs, Ottomans press but disaffected Westerners and … - even Serbs: one Serb who had previously served in army commented on crimes his own people committed… Balkan Wars of Independence . ..the horrors actually began as soon as we crossed the old frontier. By five p.m. we were approaching Kumanovo. The sun had set, it was starting to get dark. But the darker the sky became, the more brightly the fearful illumination of the fires stood out against it. Burning was going on all around us. Entire Albanian villages had been turned into pillars of fire... In all its fiery monotony this picture was repeated the whole way to Skopje... Balkan Wars of Independence For two days before my arrival in Skopje the inhabitants had woken up in the morning to the sight, under the principal bridge over the Vardar- that is, in the very centre of the town- of heaps of Albanian corpses with severed heads. Some said that these were local Albanians, killed by the komitadjis [cjetniks], others that the corpses were brought down to the bridge by the waters of the Vardar. What was clear was that these headless men had not been killed in battle.” [Cited in Glenny, Misha. The Balkans, quote p.234] Balkan Wars of Independence Ottoman estimates: 413,000 survivors settled in Empire after wars - refugee camps struck by disease - cholera in camp outside Istanbul [think about article on ‘Cholera’ in an Iranian city] - other camps: typhus, typhoid widespread Balkan Wars of Independence Cholera struck the Turkish Army (from International Committee of the Red Cross History) Balkan Wars 1912-13 “As the Ottoman Empire came to the period of the First World War, it had already suffered greater blows than any other combatants were to suffer in the Great War”. [McCarthy].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Images of the Balkan Wars of 1912-13 Enika Abazi
    Between Facts and Interpretations: Three Images of the Balkan Wars of 1912-13 Enika Abazi To cite this version: Enika Abazi. Between Facts and Interpretations: Three Images of the Balkan Wars of 1912-13. James Pettifer; Tom Buchanan. War in the Balkans: Conflict and Diplomacy before World War I, I.B.Tauris, pp.203-225, 2016, 978-1-78453-190-4. halshs-01252639 HAL Id: halshs-01252639 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01252639 Submitted on 11 Jan 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. z z-ce: ~ ~ ~ u w ~ C';j ~ ,.,,1,---'4 ~z 0 •J.:\ • 1-l ..-,'1111 0 Lq 1:-:i 1 ! 1 ·i l1l WARIN THE BALKANS Edited by JAMES PETTIFER Conflict and Diplomacy before World War I AND TOM BUCHANAN a The history of the Balkans incorporates ali the major historical themes of the twentieth century- the rise of nationalism, communism and fascism, state-sponsored genocide and urban warfare. Focusing on the century's opening decades, T+ar in the Balkans seeks to shed new light on the Balkan Wars through approaching each regional and ethnie conflict as a separate actor, before placing them in a wider context.
    [Show full text]
  • War in the Balkans, 1991-2002
    WAR IN THE BALKANS, 1991-2002 R. Craig Nation August 2003 ***** The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Ave., Carlisle, PA 17013-5244. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Publications Office by calling (717) 245-4133, FAX (717) 245-3820, or be e-mail at [email protected] ***** Most 1993, 1994, and all later Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) monographs are available on the SSI Homepage for electronic dissemination. SSI’s Homepage address is: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/ ***** The Strategic Studies Institute publishes a monthly e-mail newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic commentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please let us know by e-mail at [email protected] or by calling (717) 245-3133. ISBN 1-58487-134-2 ii CONTENTS Foreword . v Preface . vii Map of the Balkan Region. viii 1. The Balkan Region in World Politics . 1 2. The Balkans in the Short 20th Century . 43 3. The State of War: Slovenia and Croatia, 1991-92.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan Wars in Perspective: Their Significance for Turkey
    THE BALKAN WARS IN PERSPECTIVE: THEIR SIGNIFICANCE FOR TURKEY After Fifty Years It is now fifty years, a half century, since the outbreak of the First Balkan War on October 18, 1912, between Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia and Montenegro,1 on the one hand, and the Ottoman Empire on the other. This was the very day on which the Treaty of Lausanne, ending the Tri­ politan War, resulting in the loss of Libya to Italy, was signed. Forgotten are the battles of Kirk Kilissé, Kumanovo, Lulé Burgas, Monastir and Janina, as are the Russian warnings to the Bulgarians (November 3-5, 1912) against an occupation of Constantinople, save by the few remaining vet­ erans, the school children of the area, or the serious students of Balkan history. In the long, sad story of human conflict, the Balkan wars, however bloody by the standards of the time, may not seem especially important in the perspective of the years which have now passed. In the period since 1912, two great world conflicts have been fought, profound revolutionary changes have occurred, and the Balkan wars themselves now fall within the larger context on the much greater stage of world politics. Forgotten, too, no doubt, are the terms of the Treaty of London, which ended the First Balkan War on May 30, 1913 and symbolized the Ottoman defeat. By that treaty the Ottoman Empire was forced to cede all territory in Thrace west of Enos on the Aegean Sea and Midia on the Black Sea and abandon all claim to the island of Crete, while the status of Albania, a creation of the exigencies of international politics at the time, and that of the Aegean Islands was left to the decision of the Great Powers.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Wars of Yesterday: the Balkan Wars and The
    The Wars of Yesterday The Balkan Wars and the Emergence of Modern Military Conflict, 1912/13 An Introduction Katrin Boeckh and Sabine Rutar The Balkan Wars of 1912/13 and their outcomes have shaped much of the military and political thinking of the Balkan elites during the last century. At the same time, these wars were intimations of what was to become the bloodiest, most violent century in Europe’s and indeed humankind’s history. Wars often lead to other wars. Yet this process of contagion happened in a particularly gruesome manner during the twentieth century. In Europe, the Balkan Wars marked the beginning of the twentieth century’s history of warfare. In the First Balkan War (October 1912–May 1913), Serbia, Monte- negro, Greece and Bulgaria declared war on the Ottoman Empire; in the Second Balkan War (June–August 1913), Bulgaria fought Serbia, Montenegro and Greece over the Ottoman territories they had each just gained. From July onwards, Serbia, Montenegro and Greece were supported by Romania, who entered the war hoping to seize the southern Dobruja from Bulgaria. These hopes were realized. Albania, declared an independent state in November 1912, was thus a product of the First Balkan War. The borders of other territories were changed and obtained features that partially remain valid up to the present: the historical region of Macedonia, a main theatre of the wars, was divided among Greece (Aegean Macedonia), Bulgaria (Pirin Macedonia) and Serbia (Vardar Macedonia, corresponding largely to today’s Republic of Macedonia, established in 1991). The Ottoman Empire’s loss of most of its European territories in the conflict was one more warning sign of its inner weakness; it ceased to exist in the aftermath of the First World War, and was succeeded by the Republic of Turkey in 1923.
    [Show full text]
  • "L • G - Minor Professor
    RUSSIA AND THE BALKAN WARS APPROVED: MaMajoj r Professor J "l • G - Minor Professor ^yirejgl^or of the Departmet^r m. History 1 K^^^h-4 ~i Dean of the Graduate School RUSSIA AND THE BALKAN WARS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By William Conley Johnson, B. A. Denton, Texas January, 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS iv .Chapter I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1 II. RUSSIA AND THE FORMATION OF THE BALKAN ALLIANCE. ... 21 III. RUSSIA AND THE EARLY MONTHS OF THE FIRST BALKAN WAR 47 IV. RUSSIA AND THE SCUTARI QUESTION 67 V. THE DENOUEMENT: THE SECOND BALKAN WAR AND CONCLUSIONS 87 BIBLIOGRAPHY 102 lit LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. The Balkan Peninsula in 1912 69 iv CHAPTER X INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This thesis is a study and evaluation of Russian foreign policy in the Balkan Wars, 1912-13. Its primary purpose is to seek out and define the goals and aspirations of Russian diplomacy at this time and evaluate them in terms of success or failure. Recent books and articles in pro- fessional publications have shown a renewed interest in the causes of World War 1.^ An understanding of Russian diplomacy in the Balkan Wars serves as a useful contribution to a further re-evaluation of the com- plex series of causes and events which came to a climax in 1914. Russian Near Eastern foreign policy before World War I had one general goal, re- vision of the Straits question, and three secondary considerations, Pan- slavism, Balkan nationalism, and Russian competition with Austria-Hungary in the Balkans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan War and Its Implications for Islamic Socio-Political Life in Southeast Europe (1876-1914 AD)
    International Journal of Science and Society, Volume 2, Issue 4, 2020 The Balkan War and Its Implications for Islamic Socio-Political Life in Southeast Europe (1876-1914 AD) Kemal Pasha Centre of Mustafa Kemal Ankara, Turkey Email: [email protected] Abstract This research describes the historical series of the occurrence of the Balkan Wars and the implications thereof for Muslim life there. This study took three main problems, namely (1) the causes of the Balkan Wars, (2) the chronology of the Balkan wars, and (3) What are the implications of the Balkan wars on the socio-political life of Islam in Southeast Europe. The research method used in this thesis is the historical research method. 4 stages, namely (1) Heuristics, (2) Source/Verification Criticism, (3) Interpretation and (4) Historiography. There are two approaches used in this study, namely the political and sociological approaches. While the theory I use in this research is theory. Conflict and social change theory. The results of the research that the authors obtained are: chronologically, the Balkan war was preceded by the problem of Macedonia which in the end was used as an excuse to legitimize the war. Basically, the main cause of this Balkan war was due to the ambition and personal grudge between the respective rulers of the Balkan countries and the Ottoman Empire. It was also driven by the decline of the sultanate, Russian domination, the Turkish-Italian war (1911-1912), the idea of nationalism, propaganda, the formation of the Balkan alliance and the failure of diplomacy. The outbreak of the Balkan war not only resulted in geo-political changes but also was a humanitarian catastrophe for Muslims in the Balkans who at that time had to accept the fact that their situation was no longer the same as when it was led by Muslims because authority had shifted to non-Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronicle of the First World War and Its Impact on the Balkans Birinci Dünya Savaşı’Nın Tarihi Ve Balkanlar’A Etkisi
    The Chronicle Of The First World War And Its Impact On The Balkans Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nın Tarihi ve Balkanlar’a Etkisi Erjada Progonati* Abstract The process of the two Balkan Wars (1912-1913) remained incomplete until the First World War started. The aim of this study is to give some informations about The First World War and the role that Balkan region played to this war when the national consciousness of Balkan peoples began to crystallize. After the two Balkan Wars, all the Balkan states continued their efforts to gather their co-nationals into their national states. It’s concluded that the Balkan Wars leaded to the internationalization of this crisis spreading it to an ample area while many other crises at the same region were resolved without a general war in Europe. It appears that the First World War that began in 1914 in the Balkan region was a continuation of the wars that started in 1912-1913 period in the same are. Key Words: World War I, Balkans, Nationalism, Balkan Wars, History. Özet İki Balkan Savaşı (1912-1913) süreci, Birinci Dünya Savaşı başlayana dek eksik kalmıştır. Bu çalış- manın amacı, Birinci Dünya Savaşı ve ulusal bilinçlerin belirginleşmeye başlayan Balkan halklarının savaşta oynadığı roller hakkında bazı bilgiler vermektir. İki Balkan Savaşlarından sonra bütün Balkan devletleri ulus-devletlerine ortak vatandaşlarını toplamak için çabalarını sürdürmüştür. Aynı bölgede birçok krizin Avrupa’da genel bir savaşa götürmeden çözüme kavuşurken Balkan Savaşları bu durumu daha geniş bir alana yayarak krizin uluslararasılaşmasına yol açtığı sonucuna varılmaktadır. 1914 yı- lında ve Balkanlar bölgesinde başlayan Birinci Dünya Savaşı, aynı bölgede ve 1912-1913 döneminde yaşanan savaşların devamı niteliğinde olduğu düşünülmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2007 The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis Kiril Valtchev Merjanski Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Merjanski, Kiril Valtchev, "The Secret Serbian-Bulgarian Treaty of Alliance of 1904 and the Russian Policy in the Balkans Before the Bosnian Crisis" (2007). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 96. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/96 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SECRET SERBIAN-BULGARIAN TREATY OF ALLIANCE OF 1904 AND THE RUSSIAN POLICY IN THE BALKANS BEFORE THE BOSNIAN CRISIS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI M.A., Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria 2007 Wright State University COPYRIGHT BY KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI 2006 WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES Winter Quarter 2007 I hereby recommend that the thesis prepared under my supervision by KIRIL VALTCHEV MERJANSKI entitled THE SECRET SERBIAN-BULGARIAN TREATY OF ALLIANCE OF 1904 AND THE RUSSIAN POLICY IN THE BALKANS BEFORE THE BOSNIAN CRISIS be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan Wars of 1912-13 and Ethnic Stabilization in Southeastern Europe
    THE BALKAN WARS OF 1912-13 AND ETHNIC STABILIZATION IN SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE The Balkan Wars of 1912-13 represent a milestone in the transformation of Southeastern Europe. From a region managed on the basis of multiculturalism under Ottoman authority, an area of nationalist states emerged. While this process was already well underway before the Balkan Wars, by their completion the process of the nationalization of Southeastern Europe had become assured. This article investigates the demise of the Ottoman system and its aftermath, highlighting the historical roots of still ongoing disputes in the region. Richard C. Hall* Spring 2014 * Prof. Richard C. Hall is Professor of History at Georgia Southwestern State University in Americus, Georgia, USA. 131 VOLUME 13 NUMBER 1 RICHARD C. HALL he Balkan Wars of 1912-13 were two short but bloody conflicts in the Balkan Peninsula (or, more generally, Southeastern Europe) that preceded, and in many ways initiated, the First World War. In the T First Balkan War of 1912-13, a loose coalition consisting of Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro, and Serbia fought against the Ottoman Empire in order to realize these countries’ nationalist objectives. The Balkan alliance triumphed over the Ottomans, but failed to resolve disputes among themselves over the division of Ottoman territories. In the Second Balkan War of 1913, Bulgaria fought its erst- while Greek, Montenegrin, and Serbian allies, mainly over Macedonia. While the Bulgarian armies were heavily engaged in the west, Ottoman and Romanian forces seized specific Bulgarian objectives in the east of the country. The Greeks and Serbs were the big winners of the Balkan Wars; the Bulgarians and Ottomans were the big losers.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Doctors in the Serbian Sanitary Service During the Balkan Wars
    Pregledni rad Acta med-hist Adriat 2007;5(1);71-82 Review UDK: 61-05(497.11)"19" 356.3:61-05>(497.11)"19 WOMEN DOCTORS IN THE SERBIAN SANITARY SERVICE DURING THE BALKAN WARS LIJEČNICE U SRPSKOM SANITETU TIJEKOM BALKANSKIH RATOVA Ivana Lazović1, Radmila Sujić2 SUMMARY The objective of this text is to point out the problems connected with the organization of Serbian sanitary infrastructure during Balkan wars (1912 – 1913) which brought to the end of supremacy of the Ottoman Empire over the Balkan states. The Serbian sanitary service in the Balkan’s wars was well organized according to the foreign physicians participating in those wars. During the Balkan wars, twenty Serbian women doctors joined the medical corps. They were mobilized by order of the Ministry of War or assigned as directors of the reserve military hospitals developed from the former district civil hospitals. In several districts they were the only medical doctors in the town. Key words: History of medicine, 20th Century, military medicine, Women doctors, Serbia With the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1912 for all the Balkan countries a new historical period started after the London Peace Treaty was signed in 1913 between the Porte and the Balkan countries governments. The Serbian sanitary service in Balkan wars joined the armed forces which were organized by king Milan Obrenović in 1886, comprised, with 1 Dr Ivana Lazović, paediatrician, Dispanzer za zdravstvenu zaštitu dece i omladine, Učiteljska 1, RS-32000 Čačak. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Dr. Radmila Sujić, neurologist, Neuropsihijatrijska klinika KBC Zvezdara, Belgrade.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy.Pdf
    Evro region “Morava – Pcinja – Struma” “Stimulating cross-border cooperation through mutual strategic planning of cultural and historic tourism development” CARDS Programme 2005 05MAC02/02/101 STRATEGY STIMULATING CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION THROUGH MUTUAL STRATEGIC PLANNING OF CULTURAL AND HISTORIC TOURISM DEVELOPMENT (2008-2013) 2008 Sveti Nikole - Kyustendil Page CONTENTS І. Introduction 3 ІІ. SWOT-analysis of cross border region as a tourist destination 10 ІІІ. Strategy for development of tourism in the cross border region 21 ІV. Plan for strategy implementation 36 V. Applications (situation analysis) 81 1. Tourist industry nature and general characteristics 81 2. Tourist potential of the cross border region 83 3. Main problems, connected with utilization of cultural and historical 155 heritage in the cross border region as a tourist resource 4. Creation of new image and brand of tourism in the cross border region 159 – main issues 5. Basic challenges for development of tourism in the cross border region 162 2 І. Introduction The strategy is worked out in co-operation with local partners from the nine municipalities in Kyustendil district (Bobovdol, Boboshevo, Dupnitsa, Kocherinovo, Kyustendil, Nevestino, Rila, Sapareva banya and Treklyano) as well as the municipalities of Kriva Palanka, Rankovitse, Kratovo, Probistip, Vinitsa, Delchevo, Kochani, Sveti Nikole and Berovo in Macedonia, part of the cross border region. The necessity of its working out is determined by: • The possibilities for implementing into practice the concept for “territorial cohesion” of European Union, the accession of Bulgaria to which was on 01.01.2007, and Macedonia is a candidate for full-right member. • The existing social and economic problems in the cross border region and insufficient degree of its tourist potential mobilization and utilization.
    [Show full text]