PDF Download the Further Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

THE FURTHER ADVENTURES OF SHERLOCK HOLMES: WHITECHAPEL HORRORS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK

Kirkus Reviews. August 15, Publishers Weekly. September 28, Blasting News. Pastiches of Sherlock Holmes. Sherlock Holmes vs. Dracula Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Holmes The Perils of Sherlock Holmes John H. Moreau The House of Silk Moriarty Jack the Ripper in fiction. Madrid Days Batman: Gotham by Gaslight Hannibal Lecter Bridge Across Time TV film. Casebook: Jack the Ripper Blood! Sherlock Holmes and the Beast of the Stapletons. Encounters of Sherlock Holmes. The Hound of the Baskervilles. Al Feldstein. Complete Little Orphan Annie Volume Harold Gray. Sherlock Holmes: The Sign of Seven. Carole Bugge. Fu-Manchu: The Mystery of Dr. Elmore Leonard. Erle Stanley Gardner. Edgar Allan Poe. Sherlock Holmes: The Stuff of Nightmares. Leela Corman. Sherlock Holmes: The Thinking Engine. The Big Knockover. Dashiell Hammett. The Mist in the Mirror. Night Moves. VJ Boyd and Justin Boyd. The Third Man. Graham Greene. Uncle Silas. Sheridan Le Fanu. Sherlock Holmes — The Legacy of Deeds. Diabolical Summer. Thierry Smolderen. Related Articles. Looking for More Great Reads? Download Hi Res. LitFlash The eBooks you want at the lowest prices. The Whitechapel Horrors - Wikipedia

Elmore Leonard. Erle Stanley Gardner. Edgar Allan Poe. Sherlock Holmes: The Stuff of Nightmares. Leela Corman. Sherlock Holmes: The Thinking Engine. The Big Knockover. Dashiell Hammett. The Mist in the Mirror. Night Moves. VJ Boyd and Justin Boyd. The Third Man. Graham Greene. Uncle Silas. Sheridan Le Fanu. Sherlock Holmes — The Legacy of Deeds. Diabolical Summer. Thierry Smolderen. Related Articles. Looking for More Great Reads? Some international orders have seen delays as large as weeks. Auction in progress, bid now! Weekly Auction ends Monday October 26! This item is not in stock. If you use the "Add to want list" tab to add this issue to your want list, we will email you when it becomes available. Terror reigns on the streets of Whitechapel where horrific murders are being committed. Publishers Weekly. September 28, Blasting News. Pastiches of Sherlock Holmes. Sherlock Holmes vs. Dracula Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Holmes The Perils of Sherlock Holmes John H. Moreau The House of Silk Moriarty Jack the Ripper in fiction. The Further Adventures of Sherlock Holmes: The Whitechapel Horrors - Edward B. Hanna - Google книги

Very well researched. So many endnotes, and most of them were full of little facts that didn't pertain to the information, but were just a bit of backstory for things to come together, even though they weren't needed for your understanding of what was going on in the novel. Weaving of fact and fiction. Hanna handled all the characters pretty well in my opinion. Clear understanding of Holmes and Watson a That was a letdown. Clear understanding of Holmes and Watson and all the other canon characters. Along with that, he was good with the real people that were mentioned in the book. Well paced. I hate a book that isn't paced well. Like things happen too quickly or too slow for the size of the book. This one was well done. There was a good time between the murders, allowing for sufficient time for Holmes to search out the suspect. A good job of trying to fit in other cases around the center case. I thought that was unique, really. Most authors wouldn't dare try to do that since all the cases are scattered and there's no real way for us to know the chronological order of any of them, but I thought it was a nice touch to further immerse the reader in the story. Now, to the things I didn't like so much. Just please stop. Hanna had a grasp of how to do accents, yes, but they weren't done at the right place. I didn't think that Holmes would say "Yaas. Not to mention the difficulty of reading the accent and still gathering the meaning of what was being said. The point of this book is to just throw something out there, but Hanna did not give a killer at all. Left it as ambiguous as the real case is. I can admire him for that, but I would have wanted some hairbrained theory to be put to light because it's all for fun. Completely fictional, after all. The confusion of dates and such, I don't like that. In my head everything gets twisted around when they try to stick things in -- such as with the extra cases that I did dote upon earlier. It makes it a touch difficult to keep things straight, especially since their is no certainty about when the cases happened in Doyle's order. Characterization of Doyle's characters. It felt a bit off throughout the novel. Just something was off about it that made me pull away from the book to try to figure out what was off about it. Third person. Sherlock Holmes is one of the few things I think ought to be in first person. Reading it in third threw me off quite a bit for a good while since I was looking forward to reading Watson's random comments on the novel. Overall, this book held my attention, introduced things that I hadn't known before, entertained throughout the novel the whole idea that it was royalty or, at least, not a common folk doing the crimes, and Hanna did a good job with characters that weren't easy to write. There were things that needed to be ironed out, but that doesn't make it a bad book at all. A very enjoyable book to read, that is thoroughly researched and footnoted by the author, but the ultimate solution kept me from giving this a five star rating. Hanna has written a book that entertwines classic Holmes' adventures with the horrors of the Jack the Ripper murders very well, and I couldn't put it down. Watson and Holmes' voices were true to their characters as were the other "notables" that appear. I just wish the solution for Jack's identity had been better Dec 30, Robert Spencer rated it it was ok. In his dedication to detail concerning the Ripper murders, I'm afraid Hanna allows the pace to dawdle far too much. I thought the choice of a third person narrator a bit odd, especially as the conceit is that it is all based on lost notes by Watson. The ending is unforgivable, I won't say more than that. A monster is stalking the streets of Whitechapel, killing five women and frustrating not only the police service but also the esteemed Sherlock Holmes. It is quite refreshing to see a failure in the 'Further Adventures' series, but the novel feels off because of the third person narration. Hanna definitely did his research, both about the Holmesian canon and the Whitechapel murders. I particularly enjoyed the sense of historical context and the glimpses into Mycroft Holmes and his relationship to various figures of the time Prime Minister Lord Salisbury, Lord Randolph Churchill, Albert Edward, Prince of Wales, etc. Hanna manages to make the tired Royal Con Edward B. Hanna manages to make the tired Royal Conspiracy theory of Jack the Ripper fresh and compelling, as well helped by a somewhat ambiguous ending. There were some truly breathtaking scenes, including an almost-silent showdown staredown? That said, it's not a perfect work; because it's written in the third person rather than from John Watson's point of view - a necessity, since the Hound of the Baskervilles case falls in the midst of the Whitechapel murders, and Watson therefore is away from London - the reader loses much of the warmth and humanity of his perspective, and always feels a step removed from the characters. I would recommend this to anyone interested in Sherlock Holmes's take on Jack the Ripper although my favorite of these pastiches to date remains Dust and Shadow by Lyndsay Faye. It's quite a satisfying read, especially for its sense of setting, both in terms of place and time. Jun 22, Riju Ganguly rated it really liked it. Fusion of truth and fiction is fascinating for several reasons, foremost among them being the efforts on part of the author s to resolve the inconsistencies related to dates and events. Although this particular brand of fusion has been attempted at in several previous works, beginning with Ellery Queen's Fusion of truth and fiction is fascinating for several reasons, foremost among them being the efforts on part of the author s to resolve the inconsistencies related to dates and events. Although this particular brand of fusion has been attempted at in several previous works, beginning with Ellery Queen's "A Study in Terror" and reaching an astounding pinnacle or nadir, since opinions do differ in such cases in Michael Dibdin's "The Last Sherlock Holmes Story", this work amazed me due to several reasons: 1. The amount of research put into it would astonish several Ripperologists, while earning admiration from the followers of "The Game" assuming that both Sherlock Holmes and John H. Watson were real persons propounded by late William S. Inconsistencies in the chronolgy deduced from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's works have been neatly fit into the calendar of Ripper-murders. The story is eminently readable, despite the author's steadfast attachment to the Royal conspiracy theory. My only grievance is that Mr. Hanna could have given the work some sort of finality, rather than trying to be too tactical and keeping Watson as well as us in animated suspension Holmes KNEW! It is for this last minute shifting of thrust towards the truth of Ripper remaining elusive that I am taking one star away from my ratings. Otherwise, it is a very-very good novel. May 05, Michael Thompson rated it really liked it. Well written although not in the traditional Watsonian narrative , well researched and compelling reading, but a little disappointing in the ending, although understandable and oddly appropriate. The author even explanins the disappointing ending as necessary and realistic. While I'm not an expert on Holmes or the Ripper, I go greatly respect the author's apparent knowledge of both. Jan 16, S rated it it was ok. Dec 19, Patty rated it really liked it. The author has obviously done extensive research into Arthur Conan Doyle's writings about Sherlock Holmes. I thought the book was very interesting. View 2 comments. While I very much enjoyed another Sherlock story in this series, I didn't give enough thought to the fact that this series is essentially re-packaging a scattering of Sherlock stories by various authors, so there is no consistency of style or story, and just because you liked one doesn't mean you'll like the others. First, it's clear the author loves the Sherlock canon; the whole book is steeped in nods to both Co While I very much enjoyed another Sherlock story in this series, I didn't give enough thought to the fact that this series is essentially re-packaging a scattering of Sherlock stories by various authors, so there is no consistency of style or story, and just because you liked one doesn't mean you'll like the others. First, it's clear the author loves the Sherlock canon; the whole book is steeped in nods to both Conan Doyle's work and other contemporary authors of the day. This is a plus. However, this begins to feel like reference for reference's sake, as a large portion of the "winks" add little to the story. It began to feel like the author's goal was to prove how much he knows about Sherlock literature rather than engage me with a story. Also, I found myself skimming past pages of background information that really should have been left out. A reader need not be reminded how terrible the living conditions are in Whitechapel and Spitalfields so repeatedly. The author clearly conducted years of research, but unfortunately, the volumes of research inserted got in the way of the story so much that I lost all interest and momentum. The dialogue felt like I was listening to a one-trick impression of an English accent. Each character said something, then repeated it, and tagged it with a dialect tag. Horrible, indeed. Wasn't it? Very fine, indeed, eh? Think of Andy doing his British accent. That's what this felt like. And this is just the pattern without the author trying to introduce Cockney accent, which grinds the dialogue to a snail's pace. Finally, about the place where I left off, the introduction of Oscar Wilde came off reeking of homophobia and played to comedic effect that fell flat. That's when I said, "Eenuffs eenuf, innit? Feb 19, Michael Brown rated it it was ok. Another Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper. Not a bad book but in my opinion not a very good one either. The author made Watson very unlikeable with his xenophobic, homophobic, fanatical English attitudes and his overall inability to accept events without preaching them over and over. He was also presented as a bit dumber than usual for non-Conan Doyle writers. Holmes was presented as uninterested in many scientific concepts of criminal investigations which he was in favor of under Conan Doyle's w Another Sherlock Holmes vs Jack the Ripper. Holmes was presented as uninterested in many scientific concepts of criminal investigations which he was in favor of under Conan Doyle's writings. We also have long passages and even whole chapters of how Holmes felt about his actions while on stake-out or in pursuit of suspects that are very contrary to how he is presented by Doyle. The book is about pages too long as so much is already covered about the Ripper crimes and London city and society of this time that rehashing them page after page gets boring. Too much filler is created with new characters and their interactions with Holmes and trying to present some as possible Rippers. There are hundreds of footnotes which often appear to be the authors attempts to justify his meddling with characters, events and situations rather than being needed to clear up a point presented. Many would have added more filler but even presenting them at the end adds more pages of material than required. Either way his format did not add to the readability and enjoyment of this book. May 17, Ashley rated it liked it Shelves: mystery. However, the mystery itself is overlong with a humdrum ending which will interest absolutely no one. There are several engrossing appearances of actual princes, diplomats, etc. I will say that I did a bit of research before I dove into this book. I love all things Sherlock so it wasn't hard to buy in, but I wanted to read a good Jack the Ripper story and it was just good sport that these two things crossed paths in this book. This book is fantastic from both Holmes and Ripper perspectives because of the way they intertwine. The story that I know of Saucy Jack lined up well with the life and times of Holmes during the same period. Watson stitches together a web of stori I will say that I did a bit of research before I dove into this book. Watson stitches together a web of stories that is "accurate" for both sides of the story while giving each it's own special place in the story. I was intrigued with the connections between these two iconic characters and I would recommend this story to anyone that enjoys a good 's British murder story. Received as a gift, I was hesitant to read what I had imagined was going to be a dark story that was a wild re-write to a highly publicized series of events. I was wrong. Without giving any spoilers, one of the most interesting aspects of this book, is that it's not written as a Dr Watson narrative. It's presented by an anonymous third party "writer" that provides a unique perspective that tells of actions and reactions from both Sherlock and Watson as seen from afar. Paperback —. Also in Further Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. Product Details. Inspired by Your Browsing History. Sherlock Holmes — The Patchwork Devil. The West End Horror. Nicholas Meyer. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Corto Maltese: The Early Years. Sherlock Holmes: The Breath of God. James Lovegrove. Richard Stark and Darwyn Cooke. Sherlock Holmes and the Beast of the Stapletons. Encounters of Sherlock Holmes. The Hound of the Baskervilles. Al Feldstein. Complete Little Orphan Annie Volume Harold Gray. Sherlock Holmes: The Sign of Seven. Carole Bugge. September 28, Blasting News. Pastiches of Sherlock Holmes. Sherlock Holmes vs. Dracula Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Holmes The Perils of Sherlock Holmes John H. Moreau The House of Silk Moriarty Jack the Ripper in fiction. Madrid Days Batman: Gotham by Gaslight

The Whitechapel Horrors by Edward B Hanna

Other Editions 7. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about The Whitechapel Horrors , please sign up. Be the first to ask a question about The Whitechapel Horrors. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Start your review of The Whitechapel Horrors. Aug 01, Jayson rated it liked it Shelves: genre-historical , subject-jack-the-ripper , genre-mystery , era-victorian , subject-sherlock-holmes , author-american , genre-detective , pp , read-in The Ripper crimes matter only as vehicle for a postmodernist exploration of Sherlockiana. View all 7 comments. Feb 06, F. One of the most crucial elements in the original Sherlock Holmes stories is the narration. Having Watson present, witnessing events and then capturing the quicksilver genius of Holmes in his sharp and unfussy prose, is of course massively important to the success of the tales. As proof of this, see those later stories which Conan-Doyle had Holmes narrate. They are amongst the weakest. The good Doctor is of course a reader substitute, there to have these wonderful deductions explained to him an One of the most crucial elements in the original Sherlock Holmes stories is the narration. The good Doctor is of course a reader substitute, there to have these wonderful deductions explained to him and make everything clear. This decision unbalances the book right from the start. Yes, we get to know more of his habits and about his weariness at the end of the day, but seeing these private corners of the man is a bit like a magician showing the mechanics of his tricks. They are a team after all. Hanna clearly liked to play The Game, whereby Holmes fans treat these adventures as real and date them to the Victorian calendar. There are extensive notes at the end of the book, reminiscent of a Flashman novel, which show how much research the novelist has gone into. Unfortunately, what emerges the other side is some awfully pedestrian prose and some clunking expository dialogue, all leading up to a disappointingly weak ending. Given their closeness in proximity, Jack the Ripper and Sherlock Holmes are natural rivals, I just wish someone would produce a sharper telling of the tale. Hanna plays at "What If? Who could doubt it? And what if he had investigated the horrible murders committed by Jack the Ripper? For surely, the Great Detective would have been called in on such a notorious case. There is no doubt that Hanna knew his Holmes. He was a long-time Holmes buff and a member of the Baker Street Irregulars. And he most definitely had done his research in Ripper lore. Though a work of fiction, the novel is meticulously footnoted. Those who are well-acquainted with the Holmes canon may say, too much footnoting--he chooses to footnote material that anyone who knows the least bit about Holmes and Watson should know--but better too much than not enough. Hanna has used the Holmes canon and the facts of the terrible murders in and blended them into a dandy little tale. And it is very interesting to follow Holmes on the track of one of the most notorious killers of all time. Almost pages long, the book flies by I finished it in a little over the day and I didn't want to put it down until I got to the end. Hanna gets almost everything right. I quibble with bits of his portrayal of Watson--I maintain that the doctor is too good-hearted to espouse some of the derogatory comments and prejudicial beliefs Hanna attributes to him. Yes, some of the comments about the poor and certain races living in London were true of the day--but surely Hanna could have presented those details without putting them in the mouth of the good doctor. Watson does in a lot of ways represent the stalwart British man of his time, but not in all ways. My other quibble is the ending--or rather the lack thereof. It is very disquieting to follow Holmes throughout the story and be left hanging at the end. We aren't told who the Great Detective believes Jack the Ripper to be and we are supposed to believe that at the end of the day Holmes doesn't even know. That Holmes is no more enlightened than the police. That is not the Holmes we know. Overall, a good tale. Hanna makes it very believable that Holmes could have investigated this case. And the blend of fact and fiction is very good. An enjoyable read worth three stars. Please request permission to repost any portion. I'm not really sure about this book. Oh, it was really well written indeed and well researched too. But for me there are far too many questions unanswered to be satisfied. Also the over foot notes were much too distracting as informative as they were. If I read a fictional book about the Ripper accounts and one that features Sherlock Holmes I want the killer to be identified at the end that's what's fiction is for imo. The third person narrative was also a little off putting for me. So rea I'm not really sure about this book. So reading The Whitechapel Horrors left me wholey unsatisfied and I think I will read Dust and Shadow again - the best book on the Ripper accounts feat. Sherlock Holmes I've come across this far. View 1 comment. I really really wanted to like this book but unfortunately it failed in every possible way a Holmes-pastiche can fail, in every way a fictional re-telling of Jack the Ripper's crimes can fail and in most ways a historical crime novel can fail. First of all: The story is not told by Watson but by a third person-narrator with insight in the minds of Holmes and Watson. So the we don't only read about Watson being amazed by Holmes deductions, we also see Holmes being desperate, having no idea what I really really wanted to like this book but unfortunately it failed in every possible way a Holmes-pastiche can fail, in every way a fictional re-telling of Jack the Ripper's crimes can fail and in most ways a historical crime novel can fail. So the we don't only read about Watson being amazed by Holmes deductions, we also see Holmes being desperate, having no idea what to do next and so on. Holmes being human in that way doesn't work for me. I need the mystery. Besides we are still kept in the dark about many of his deductions. Holmes finds a vital clue quite early on in the book but refuses to tell Watson about it and even when we're accompanying Holmes we don't learn anything about it until Holmes tells Watson over pages later that happens a couple of times though later with less pages in between. Why bother with that that kind of narration when you still won't let your readers know everything? I hate them because by now it is quite widely known that Holmes was not real so there is absolutely no need to pretend he was. And if you do it at least keep it short. Hannah goes on for pages about one person getting it from another and about orders not to open it before a certain date. Then there are the footnotes. On pages of story and another 10 postscript by the author there are footnotes. Let me say that again: footnotes. I really only accept Terry Pratchett's excessive use of footnotes in fiction but even if he had that amount in a novel I'd complain also: this edition, at least, doesn't have the footnotes at the bottom of the page but at the end of the book, so you'll have to leaf to the back of the book times. And the footnotes aren't even interesting but I'm that kind of person that just has to check them anyway and could mostly be summed up with 'Oh look how clever I am! Look how much research I did!!! Some footnotes just refer to the Holmes-canon, e. You can argue about how necessary those are. Personally I think that the Holmes-nerd will know that anyway and the other won't care that much in fact I think that not even Holmes- nerds will care that much about how many dressing-gowns he had, which colours they were and which he wore most but Hanna still explains it in a footnote. The same goes for the footnotes explaining more about Victorian society or giving more information about the real people that appear in this story. Then there are the second-worst kind of footnotes which explain in-jokes. The footnote then informs us about Pygmalion. See above: Nerds will know it and others won't care. However, the absolutely worst are those in which the author points out his own mistakes. I am not making this up. Sorry but on what level of insanity is this author operating? Does he actually believe that this was an old manuscript? I do not understand. Besides all this I didn't think that Hannah managed to capture Holmes terribly well. Partly that's certainly because of the unusual narration-perspective but he also fell in the trap that lots of Holmes-pastiche writers fall into: Holmes is too much of a jerk and Watson too much of an idiot. This is of course a very fine line and others might see it differently but Watson seems barely able to string coherent thoughts together and Holmes insults him constantly so I really began wondering why those two still stuck together at all. I never felt the genuine friendship from the original stories. Holmes mostly mocks Watson and keeps much more from him than usually. Lastly there is the small issue of Jack the Ripper who seems to be missing from large parts of this book. Sometimes he's barely mentioned at all in the chapters and instead we learn all kinds of things about the Victorian age and its famous people. That's another fine line. On the one hand I do want information on the time a historic novel is set in, on the other if I am terribly interested I can read non-fiction. However, here the author wasn't a bit over the line, he was miles away. I ended up skipping whole paragraphs because I simply did not care enough. Often I also skipped whole paragraphs because the author loved introducing new characters or places with half a page of adjectives I'd really love to say anything positive about this book but I simply can't. In fact I have already focused on all the major annoyances and left out the minor things because this review is already long enough. My quest for a good Holmes meets the Ripper-story continues. That was a letdown. But, I'm going to start with the things that I enjoyed about the book. Very well researched. So many endnotes, and most of them were full of little facts that didn't pertain to the information, but were just a bit of backstory for things to come together, even though they weren't needed for your understanding of what was going on in the novel. Weaving of fact and fiction. Hanna handled all the characters pretty well in my opinion. Clear understanding of Holmes and Watson a That was a letdown. Clear understanding of Holmes and Watson and all the other canon characters. Along with that, he was good with the real people that were mentioned in the book. Well paced. I hate a book that isn't paced well. Like things happen too quickly or too slow for the size of the book. This one was well done. There was a good time between the murders, allowing for sufficient time for Holmes to search out the suspect. A good job of trying to fit in other cases around the center case. I thought that was unique, really. Most authors wouldn't dare try to do that since all the cases are scattered and there's no real way for us to know the chronological order of any of them, but I thought it was a nice touch to further immerse the reader in the story. Now, to the things I didn't like so much. Just please stop. Hanna had a grasp of how to do accents, yes, but they weren't done at the right place. I didn't think that Holmes would say "Yaas. Not to mention the difficulty of reading the accent and still gathering the meaning of what was being said. The point of this book is to just throw something out there, but Hanna did not give a killer at all. Left it as ambiguous as the real case is. I can admire him for that, but I would have wanted some hairbrained theory to be put to light because it's all for fun. Completely fictional, after all. The confusion of dates and such, I don't like that. In my head everything gets twisted around when they try to stick things in -- such as with the extra cases that I did dote upon earlier. It makes it a touch difficult to keep things straight, especially since their is no certainty about when the cases happened in Doyle's order. Characterization of Doyle's characters. It felt a bit off throughout the novel. Just something was off about it that made me pull away from the book to try to figure out what was off about it. Third person. Sherlock Holmes is one of the few things I think ought to be in first person. Reading it in third threw me off quite a bit for a good while since I was looking forward to reading Watson's random comments on the novel. Overall, this book held my attention, introduced things that I hadn't known before, entertained throughout the novel the whole idea that it was royalty or, at least, not a common folk doing the crimes, and Hanna did a good job with characters that weren't easy to write. There were things that needed to be ironed out, but that doesn't make it a bad book at all. A very enjoyable book to read, that is thoroughly researched and footnoted by the author, but the ultimate solution kept me from giving this a five star rating. Hanna has written a book that entertwines classic Holmes' adventures with the horrors of the Jack the Ripper murders very well, and I couldn't put it down. Watson and Holmes' voices were true to their characters as were the other "notables" that appear. I just wish the solution for Jack's identity had been better Dec 30, Robert Spencer rated it it was ok. In his dedication to detail concerning the Ripper murders, I'm afraid Hanna allows the pace to dawdle far too much. I thought the choice of a third person narrator a bit odd, especially as the conceit is that it is all based on lost notes by Watson. The ending is unforgivable, I won't say more than that. A monster is stalking the streets of Whitechapel, killing five women and frustrating not only the police service but also the esteemed Sherlock Holmes. It is quite refreshing to see a failure in the 'Further Adventures' series, but the novel feels off because of the third person narration. Hanna definitely did his research, both about the Holmesian canon and the Whitechapel murders. I particularly enjoyed the sense of historical context and the glimpses into Mycroft Holmes and his relationship to various figures of the time Prime Minister Lord Salisbury, Lord Randolph Churchill, Albert Edward, Prince of Wales, etc. Hanna manages to make the tired Royal Con Edward B. Hanna manages to make the tired Royal Conspiracy theory of Jack the Ripper fresh and compelling, as well helped by a somewhat ambiguous ending. There were some truly breathtaking scenes, including an almost-silent showdown staredown? That said, it's not a perfect work; because it's written in the third person rather than from John Watson's point of view - a necessity, since the Hound of the Baskervilles case falls in the midst of the Whitechapel murders, and Watson therefore is away from London - the reader loses much of the warmth and humanity of his perspective, and always feels a step removed from the characters. I would recommend this to anyone interested in Sherlock Holmes's take on Jack the Ripper although my favorite of these pastiches to date remains Dust and Shadow by Lyndsay Faye. It's quite a satisfying read, especially for its sense of setting, both in terms of place and time. Jun 22, Riju Ganguly rated it really liked it. Fusion of truth and fiction is fascinating for several reasons, foremost among them being the efforts on part of the author s to resolve the inconsistencies related to dates and events. Although this particular brand of fusion has been attempted at in several previous works, beginning with Ellery Queen's Fusion of truth and fiction is fascinating for several reasons, foremost among them being the efforts on part of the author s to resolve the inconsistencies related to dates and events. Although this particular brand of fusion has been attempted at in several previous works, beginning with Ellery Queen's "A Study in Terror" and reaching an astounding pinnacle or nadir, since opinions do differ in such cases in Michael Dibdin's "The Last Sherlock Holmes Story", this work amazed me due to several reasons: 1. The amount of research put into it would astonish several Ripperologists, while earning admiration from the followers of "The Game" assuming that both Sherlock Holmes and John H. Watson were real persons propounded by late William S. Inconsistencies in the chronolgy deduced from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's works have been neatly fit into the calendar of Ripper-murders. The story is eminently readable, despite the author's steadfast attachment to the Royal conspiracy theory. My only grievance is that Mr. Hanna could have given the work some sort of finality, rather than trying to be too tactical and keeping Watson as well as us in animated suspension Holmes KNEW! It is for this last minute shifting of thrust towards the truth of Ripper remaining elusive that I am taking one star away from my ratings. Otherwise, it is a very-very good novel. May 05, Michael Thompson rated it really liked it. Well written although not in the traditional Watsonian narrative , well researched and compelling reading, but a little disappointing in the ending, although understandable and oddly appropriate. Sherlock Holmes — The Patchwork Devil. The West End Horror. Nicholas Meyer. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Corto Maltese: The Early Years. Sherlock Holmes: The Breath of God. James Lovegrove. Richard Stark and Darwyn Cooke. Sherlock Holmes and the Beast of the Stapletons. Encounters of Sherlock Holmes. The Hound of the Baskervilles. Al Feldstein. Complete Little Orphan Annie Volume Harold Gray. Sherlock Holmes: The Sign of Seven. Carole Bugge. Fu-Manchu: The Mystery of Dr. Elmore Leonard. Erle Stanley Gardner. Edgar Allan Poe. Sherlock Holmes: The Stuff of Nightmares. Leela Corman. Sherlock Holmes: The Thinking Engine. The Big Knockover. Dashiell Hammett. The Mist in the Mirror. Night Moves. VJ Boyd and Justin Boyd. The Third Man. Graham Greene. Uncle Silas. https://files8.webydo.com/9585665/UploadedFiles/9B8A8AD6-C5EB-AC6F-EACD-F10C138C29F5.pdf https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/9666705f-a2e0-416e-a1c8-5d6f07c85b0c/das-apostolische-glaubensbekenntnis-929.pdf https://static.s123-cdn-static.com/uploads/4640501/normal_601edb9d3b225.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9586441/UploadedFiles/44AA20D4-E2DF-E7D8-DB7B-7523A4F13BD4.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9588761/UploadedFiles/A375BC34-5FDF-695E-B72E-80DCCE1B376C.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9585721/UploadedFiles/DC400194-7113-B60D-F7BC-CD89B49E6A05.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9589299/UploadedFiles/C523D1DC-1A97-9CF2-E901-AD3162940916.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9586133/UploadedFiles/8EBFE3E8-755F-4CCD-F150-709EB4BF1C80.pdf