DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey Granite County Area, Montana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey Granite County Area, Montana How to Use This Soil Survey Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, you can locate the Section, Township, and Range by zooming in on the Index to Map Sheets, or you can go to the Web Soil Survey at (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/). Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. The Contents lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. See the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. ii This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1994. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1996. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1996. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. It is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Granite County Conservation District. The most current official data are available through the NRCS Soil Data Mart website at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: Looking south from Rattler Gulch, the foreground is an area of Winspect gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, while the background is an area of Whitecow gravelly loam, cool, 35 to 60 percent slopes. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. iii Contents Part I 135D—Baggs loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes ...... 33 Bandy Series ..................................................... 34 How To Use This Soil Survey .................................. i 614B—Bandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes ........ 35 Index to Taxonomic Units ................................... xvi 814B—Bandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, Index to Map Units ............................................. xviii rarely flooded............................................... 35 Summary of Tables .............................................xxix 844A—Bandy-Blossberg complex, Foreword .............................................................xxxi 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded ........... 35 Introduction ............................................................ 1 Bata Series ........................................................ 36 General Nature of the Survey Area .......................... 1 66D—Bata gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent History and Development .................................... 1 slopes .......................................................... 37 Industry, Transportation, and Recreation ............. 2 66E—Bata gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent Physiography and Drainage................................. 2 slopes .......................................................... 37 Geology ............................................................... 3 Bignell Series ..................................................... 38 Mineral and Ground-Water Resources ................ 5 99E—Bignell gravelly clay loam, 15 to 35 Seismicity............................................................. 6 percent slopes ............................................. 39 Climate................................................................. 7 99F—Bignell gravelly loam, dry, 35 to 60 How This Survey Was Made .................................. 7 percent slopes ............................................. 39 Formation and Classification of the Soils .......... 13 199D—Bignell gravelly loam, 8 to 15 percent Formation of the Soils ........................................ 13 slopes .......................................................... 39 Climate .......................................................... 13 199E—Bignell gravelly loam, 15 to 35 percent Living Organisms ........................................... 13 slopes .......................................................... 40 Topography .................................................... 13 199F—Bignell gravelly loam, 35 to 60 percent Parent Material .............................................. 14 slopes .......................................................... 40 Time............................................................... 14 299D—Bignell, dry-Yreka, cool complex, Classification of the Soils ................................... 14 8 to 15 percent slopes ................................. 41 Soil Series and Detailed Soil Map Units ............. 27 299E—Bignell, dry-Yreka, cool complex, Albicalis Series .................................................. 28 15 to 35 percent slopes ............................... 41 12A—Albicalis loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, 299F—Bignell-Yreka gravelly loams, 35 to 60 rarely flooded............................................... 29 percent slopes ............................................. 42 112A—Albicalis loam, impacted, 0 to 2 percent 399D—Bignell-Yreka gravelly loams, 8 to 15 slopes, occasionally flooded ....................... 29 percent slopes ............................................. 42 Ambrant Series .................................................. 30 399E—Bignell-Yreka complex, cool, 15 to 35 179D—Ambrant-Rochester complex, 4 to 15 percent slopes ............................................. 43 percent slopes ............................................. 31 399F—Bignell-Yreka complex, cool, 35 to 60 179E—Ambrant-Rochester complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes ............................................. 43 percent slopes ............................................. 31 499D—Bignell-Yreka complex, 8 to 15 percent 179F—Ambrant-Rochester complex, 35 to 60 slopes .......................................................... 44 percent slopes ............................................. 32 499E—Bignell-Yreka complex, 15 to 35 percent Baggs Series ..................................................... 32 slopes .......................................................... 44 135B—Baggs loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes ........ 33 iv 499F—Bignell-Yreka complex, 35 to 60 percent 442E—Braziel-Tolbert complex, 15 to 35 slopes .......................................................... 45 percent slopes ............................................. 57 799D—Bignell-Yreka-Crow complex, 8 to 15 442F—Braziel-Tolbert gravelly loams, 35 to 60 percent slopes ............................................. 45 percent slopes ............................................. 57 799E—Bignell-Yreka-Crow complex, 15 to 35 542C—Braziel-Shanley gravelly loams, 4 to 8 percent slopes ............................................. 46 percent slopes ............................................. 58 Blossberg Series ............................................... 47 542D—Braziel-Shanley gravelly loams, 8 to 15 634B—Blossberg loam, 0 to 4 percent percent slopes ............................................. 58 slopes .......................................................... 48 542E—Braziel-Shanley gravelly loams, 834B—Blossberg loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, 15 to 35 percent slopes ............................... 59 rarely flooded............................................... 48 542F—Braziel-Shanley gravelly loams, Boxwell Series ................................................... 48 35 to 60 percent slopes ............................... 59 69C—Boxwell loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes ........ 49 Canarway Series ............................................... 60 69D—Boxwell loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes ...... 50 111A—Canarway-Mccabe complex, 0 to 2 69E—Boxwell loam, 15 to 35 percent slopes .... 50 percent slopes, occasionally flooded .......... 61 Braziel Series..................................................... 50 Carett Series ...................................................... 61 200E—Braziel-Tolbert-Rock outcrop complex, Cetrack Series ................................................... 62 15 to 35 percent slopes ............................... 51 34B—Cetrack loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes ........ 63 200F—Braziel-Tolbert-Rock outcrop complex, 34C—Cetrack loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes ........ 63 35 to 60 percent slopes ..............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana
    Report of Investigation 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg 2015 Cover photo by Richard Berg. Sapphires (very pale green and colorless) concentrated by panning. The small red grains are garnets, commonly found with sapphires in western Montana, and the black sand is mainly magnetite. Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology MBMG Report of Investigation 23 2015 i Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Descriptions of Occurrences ..................................................................................................7 Selected Bibliography of Articles on Montana Sapphires ................................................... 75 General Montana ............................................................................................................75 Yogo ................................................................................................................................ 75 Southwestern Montana Alluvial Deposits........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Rock Creek sapphire district ........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Dry Cottonwood Creek deposit and the Butte area ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Framework of the Upper Clark Fork River Area: Deer Lodge, Granite, Powell, and Silver Bow Counties R15W R14W R13W R12W By
    Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Montana Groundwater Assessment Atlas No. 5, Part B, Map 2 A Department of Montana Tech of The University of Montana July 2009 Open-File Version Hydrogeologic Framework of the Upper Clark Fork River Area: Deer Lodge, Granite, Powell, and Silver Bow Counties R15W R14W R13W R12W by S Qsf w Qsf Yb Larry N. Smith a n T21N Qsf Yb T21N R Authors Note: This map is part of the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology (MBMG) a n Pz Pz Groundwater Assessment Atlas for the Upper Clark Fork River Area groundwater Philipsburg ValleyUpper Flint Creek g e Pz Qsf characterization. It is intended to stand alone and describe a single hydrogeologic aspect of the study area, although many of the areas hydrogeologic features are The town of Philipsburg is the largest population center in the valley between the Qsc interrelated. For an integrated view of the hydrogeology of the Upper Clark Fork Area Flint Creek Range and the John Long Mountains. The Philipsburg Valley contains 47o30 the reader is referred to Part A (descriptive overview) and Part B (maps) of the Montana 040 ft of Quaternary alluvial sediment deposited along streams cut into Tertiary 47o30 Groundwater Assessment Atlas 5. sedimentary rocks of unknown thickness. The east-side valley margin was glaciated . T20N Yb t R during the last glaciation, producing ice-sculpted topography and rolling hills in side oo B kf l Ovando c INTRODUCTION drainages on the west slopes of the Flint Creek Range. Prominent benches between ac la kf k B Blac oo N F T20N tributaries to Flint Creek are mostly underlain by Tertiary sedimentary rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land
    Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land Map of the Curlew Mine by Rick Schmidt in MBMG mineral property files Open-File Report MBMG 484 Phyllis A. Hargrave Catherine McDonald Michael D. Kerschen John J. Metesh Robert Wintergerst Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region 1 Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land Open-File Report MBMG 484 October 2003 Phyllis A. Hargrave Catherine McDonald Michael D. Kerschen John J. Metesh Robert Wintergerst Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region 1 CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................1 1.1 Project Objectives ....................................................1 1.2 Abandoned and Inactive Mines Defined . 2 1.3 Health and Environmental Problems at Mines . 2 1.3.1 Acid Mine Drainage ...........................................3 1.3.2 Solubilities of Selected Metals ...................................3 1.3.3 The Use of pH and SC to Identify Problems . 5 1.4 Methodology ........................................................5 1.4.1 Data Sources .................................................5 1.4.2 Pre-Field Screening............................................6 1.4.3 Field Screening ...............................................7 1.4.4 Field Methods ................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Miles Romney Jr., Chronicler of the Neglected Truth
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1990 Miles Romney Jr., chronicler of the neglected truth Christine L. Johnson The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Johnson, Christine L., "Miles Romney Jr., chronicler of the neglected truth" (1990). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2982. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2982 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mike and Maureen MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's written consent. MontanaUniversity of MILES ROMNEY JR. CHRONICLER OF THE NEGLECTED TROTH By Christine L. Johnson B. S., Montana State College, 1958 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1990 Approved by Dean, Graduate School / Dat UMI Number: EP36377 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Squaw Rock a Proposed Montana State Natural Area
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1983 Squaw Rock a proposed Montana State Natural Area Janet L. Illgner The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Illgner, Janet L., "Squaw Rock a proposed Montana State Natural Area" (1983). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5952. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5952 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SQUAW ROCK, A PROPOSED MONTANA STATE NATURAL AREA by Janet L. Illgner B.S., University of Nebraska (Omaha), 1975 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1977 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School / UMI Number: EP36753 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT O isM rtM bn PublHUwtg UMI EP36753 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Elliston Region, Powell and Lewis and Clark Counties, Montana
    Geology of the Elliston Region, Powell and Lewis and Clark Counties, Montana U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2045 / Geology of the Elliston Region, Powell and Lewis and Clark Counties, Montana By R. G. SCHMIDT, J. S. LOEN, C. A. WALLACE, and H. H. MEHNERT U.S .. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2045 A description of rocks and structures in the region of the imbricate front of the Sapphire thrust plate, from a reconnaissance study UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director For sale by USGS Map Distribution Box 25286, Building 810 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or finn names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Library or Congress Cataloging-In-Publication Data Geology of the Elliston region, Powell and Lewis and Clark Counties, Montana : a de­ scription of rocks and structures in the region of the imbricate front of the Sapphire thrust plate, from a reconnaissance study I by R.G. Schmidt ... [et al.]. p. em. - (U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin; 2045) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:2045 1. Geology-Montana-Elliston Region. I. Schmidt, R.G., d. 1983. II. Series. QE75.B9 no. 2045 [QE134.E45] 557.3 s-dc20 92-42415 [557.86'615] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverines in the Western United States Biological
    Biological Conservation 166 (2013) 276–286 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Developing priorities for metapopulation conservation at the landscape scale: Wolverines in the Western United States ⇑ Robert M. Inman a,b,c, , Brent L. Brock c, Kristine H. Inman a, Shawn S. Sartorius d, Bryan C. Aber a,e,f, Brian Giddings g, Steven L. Cain h, Mark L. Orme f, Jay A. Fredrick i, Bob J. Oakleaf j, Kurt L. Alt g, Eric Odell k, Guillaume Chapron b a Wildlife Conservation Society, 222 East Main Street, Lone Elk Suite 3B, Ennis, MT 59729, USA b Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden c Craighead Environmental Institute, 201 South Wallace Ave., Suite B2D, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA d United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 585 Shepard Way, Helena, MT 59601, USA e Idaho Department of Fish and Game, 3726 Highway 20, Island Park, ID 83429, USA f United States Forest Service, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, ID 83401, USA g Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, 1420 East 6th Ave., Helena, MT 59620, USA h National Park Service, Grand Teton National Park, Drawer 170, Moose, WY 83012, USA i United States Forest Service, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, 5 Forest Service Road, Ennis, MT 59729, USA j Wyoming Game and Fish Department, 260 Beauna Vista, Lander, WY 82520, USA k Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 317 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA article info abstract Article history: Wildlife populations are often influenced by multiple political jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Gray Wolf Conservation and Management 2010 Annual Report
    Montana Gray Wolf Conservation and Management 2010 Annual Report A cooperative effort by Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, USDA Wildlife Services, Glacier National Park, Yellowstone National Park, Blackfeet Nation, and The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes MFWP by photo Liz Bradley This report presents information on the status, distribution, and management of wolves in the State of Montana, from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. It is also available at: www.fwp.mt.gov/wildthings/wolf This report may be copied in its original form and distributed as needed. Suggested Citation: Sime, Carolyn A., V. Asher, L. Bradley, N. Lance, K. Laudon, M. Ross, A. Nelson, and J. Steuber. 2011. Montana gray wolf conservation and management 2010 annual report. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks. Helena, Montana. 168 pp TABLE OF CONTENTS MONTANA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................... 3 Delisting Efforts and Ligation in 2007 - 2010 ...................................................... 4 STATEWIDE PROGRAM OVERVIEW......................................................................... 8 Overview of Wolf Ecology in Montana ................................................................ 9 Population Estimation and Monitoring Methods .................................................. 11 Border Packs ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Granite County Long Range Plan 2020
    Long Range Plan Granite County, Montana Section I. Introduction Vision: Improve natural resources for the public and increase sustainability for agricultural producers within Granite County. Mission: To effectively address natural resource concerns with assistance from agricultural producers, partners, and concerned citizens. Purpose: This plan is intended to be a guide for future investment in the natural resources of Granite County. As a guide, this document will be reviewed annually and modified as needed to reflect changing resource goals and objectives. The Granite County Long Range Plan was developed by the USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) – Philipsburg and Deer Lodge Field Offices, Granite Conservation District, and Granite County. The initial timeframe covered by this plan is five years, ending in 2025. Additional local partners were also consulted during the completion of this plan. Existing resource plans and management plans from partners have been referenced in completing this document. A full listing of resources can be found in the “Source” section. Partners in Natural Resources ● USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) ● Clark Fork Coalition ● US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) ● US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ● US Forest Service (USFS) ● Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) ● Montana Dept. of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) ● Trout Unlimited (TU) ● Ducks Unlimited (DU) ● Intermountain West Joint Venture (IWJV) ● Five Valleys Land Trust ● Soil and Water Conservation Districts of Montana (SWCDM) ● Montana Association of Conservation Districts (MACD) 1 | Page Section II. Natural Resource Inventory Granite County includes a diversity of landforms and ecosystems. The area contains an abundance of lakes, rivers, streams, wetlands and are dominated by forests, grassland, and shrub communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverine Ecology and Conservation in the Western United States
    Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae • 2013:4 No. Thesis Doctoral Doctoral Thesis No. 2013:4 This thesis focuses on wolverine ecology and conservation in the western Doctoral Thesis No. 2013:4 United States. The thesis covers the wolverine’s niche, scale of effective Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences management, and conservation priorities; it also examines the institutional system in place for delivering conservation actions for non-game species like wolverines. The analyses presented include home range size, movement Ecology and Conservation in the Western… Wolverine Wolverine Ecology and Conservation in rates, social organization, density, dispersal, reproductive chronology, habitat the Western United States selection, and connectivity. This thesis provides information that can facilitate recovery and management of this candidate endangered species. Robert Michael Inman Robert Michael Inman received his Master and Bachelor of Science degrees from the University of Tennessee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae presents doctoral theses from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). SLU generates knowledge for the sustainable use of biological natural • Robert Michael Inman • Robert Michael resources. Research, education, extension, as well as environmental monitoring and assessment are used to achieve this goal. Online publication of thesis summary: http://epsilon.slu.se/eindex.html ISSN 1652-6880 ISBN 978-91-576-7761-7 Wolverine Ecology and Conservation in the Western United States Robert Michael Inman Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Ecology Uppsala Doctoral Thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala 2013 Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae 2013:4 Cover: F121 and two cubs of the year in the Gravelly Range of Montana, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MINERAL INVESTIGATIONS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESOURCES MAP MR-96 PAMPHLET MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF PRODUCTIVE LODE AND PLACER GOLD MINES IN MONTANA By David Frishman, I.E. Elliott, E.E. Foord, R.C. Pearson, and W.H. Raymond INTRODUCTION mines that ceased production long ago, the list of commodities present is likely incomplete. For lode This pamphlet contains tabular information keyed mines having recorded production, not all the to the accompanying map. Table 1 lists site names commodities listed were necessarily recovered some numerically keyed to the map; sites are organized by may be minor elements that are listed because they county and numbered consecutively by mining district record the geochemical signature of the deposit. within each county. Site numbers were assigned Industrial commodities, however (like silicon or abrasive geographically by county with the intention of making it sand), are listed only when they were produced. Silver as easy as possible to find a particular number on the is listed as a commodity along with gold for aT placer map after the site name and number have been mines because we are confident that silver was produced identified in table 1. The site name listed is the one and, eventually, refined, even from those placer deposits that seemed to be most commonly used and is usually whose gold was of high fineness. the name of a mine (for lodes) or a creek or gulch (for Host rock type as given in table 1 is that from placers). In some cases, the name is that of a claim, a which the gold or gold-bearing minerals were ertracted group of claims, or, rarely, an exploration project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistory of the Lolo and Bitterroot National Forests : an Overview
    The Prehistory of the Lolo and Bitterroot National Forests : an Overview TEEPEES AT NEZ PERCE PASS 1899' USDA F9_rest Service, Northern Region Lalo and Bitterroot National Forests 19-86 - C. Milo McLeod ---7 Zone Archeologist i Douglas Melton Archeologicaf Technician THE PREHISTORY OF THE LOLO AND BITTERROOT NATIONAL FORESTS (AN OVERVIEW) OR "MAKING IT IN A MARGINAL ENVIROM-1ENT THE PAST 10,000 YEARS!" JANUARY 1986 C. Milo McLeod Zone Archeologist Lolo/Bitterroot National Forests Douglas Melton Archeological Technician Lolo National Forest ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Anyone who has undertaken the task of researching and writing an "overview" is aware of the magnitude of the job. The authors have spent well over a year researching, writing, editing, and of course reediting drafts of this document. The project, however, could never have been completed without the support of many people both within and outside the Forest Service who either worked on or, from a management or supervisory capacity, strongly supported the project. Special thanks is extended to Dr. Ernestine Green, Regional Archeologist, who recognized the need for an overview of the Lolo and Bitterroot National Forests and acquired the necessary funds to accomplish the job. Special thanks is also extended to Orville Daniels, Forest Supervisor, Lolo National Forest, who has consistently supported the Cultural Resource Management Program since its inception. Thanks to Chuck Spoon, Program Officer for Resources, Lolo National Forest, and Dave Colclough and Chuck Troxel, Bitterroot National Forest, for supporting the project whenever required from beginning to end. Thanks to Marcella Scherfy, Alan Stanfill, and Dave Schwab at the ~bntana State Historic Preservation Office for reading and commenting on chapter drafts and providing encouragement as well as constructive criticism.
    [Show full text]