ROLLING CONTACT ORTHOPAEDIC JOINT DESIGN by Alexander Henry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ROLLING CONTACT ORTHOPAEDIC JOINT DESIGN by Alexander Henry ROLLING CONTACT ORTHOPAEDIC JOINT DESIGN by Alexander Henry Slocum, Jr. S.M., Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 S.B., Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008 Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2013 © 2013 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, All Rights Reserved Author:_______________________________________________________________________ Alexander H. Slocum, Jr. Department of Mechanical Engineering January 11, 2013 Certified by:___________________________________________________________________ Prof. Kripa K. Varanasi Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Thesis Supervisor and Committee Chair Accepted by:___________________________________________________________________ David E. Hardt Professor of Mechanical Engineering Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students ROLLING CONTACT ORTHOPAEDIC JOINT DESIGN by Alexander Henry Slocum, Jr. Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on January 11 th , 2013 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering Abstract Arthroplasty, the practice of rebuilding diseased biological joints using engineering materials, is often used to treat severe arthritis of the knee and hip. Prosthetic joints have been created in a “biomimetic” manner to reconstruct the shape of the biological joint. We are at a disadvantage, however, in that metals and polymers used to replace bone and articular cartilage often wear out too soon, leading to significant morbidity. This thesis explores the use of kinetic-mimicry, instead of bio-mimicry, to design prosthetic rolling contact joints, including knee braces, limb prosthetics, and joint prostheses, with the intent of reducing morbidity and complications associated with joint/tissue failure. A deterministic approach to joint design is taken to elucidating six functional requirements for a prosthetic tibiofemoral joint based on anatomical observations of human knee kinetics and kinematics. Current prostheses have a high slide/roll ratio, resulting in unnecessary wear. A rolling contact joint, however, has a negligible slide/roll ratio; rolling contact prostheses would therefore be more efficient. A well-established four-bar linkage knee model, in a sagittal plane that encapsulates with the knee’s flexion/extension degree of freedom, is used to link human anatomy to the shape of rolling cam surfaces. The first embodiment of the design is a flexure coupling-based joint for knee braces. Failure mode analysis, followed by cyclic failure testing, has shown that the prototype joint is extremely robust and withstood half a million cycles during the first round of tests. Lubrication in the joint is also considered: micro- and nano-textured porous coatings are investigated for their potential to support the formation of favorable lubrication regimes. Hydrodynamic lubrication is optimal, as two surfaces are separated by a fluid gap, thus mitigating wear. Preliminary results have shown that shear stress is reduced by more than 60% when a coating is combined with a shear thinning lubricant like synovial fluid. These coatings could be incorporated into existing joint prostheses to help mitigate wear in current technology. This thesis seeks to describe improvements to the design of prosthetic joints, both existing and future, with the intent of increasing the overall quality of care delivered to the patient. Thesis Supervisor: Kripa K. Varanasi Title: Doherty Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering 2 Doctoral Thesis Committee Thesis Supervisor and Committee Chair: Kripa K. Varanasi, PhD Doherty Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Martin L. Culpepper, PhD Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Douglas P. Hart, PhD Professor of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Just Herder, PhD Associate Professor of Mechanical and Biomechanical Engineering TU Delft, The Netherlands 3 This work is dedicated to Bubsi, Marianna, Pat and John Through this their memory lives on! 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to my creator, in whatever form that may be, for giving me the skill of mind and hand used to execute this work My wife, Sarah Slocum (7) SB ‘11, the patience, love, and support you have shown me from day one have made me a better man. I have gotten more out of a class that I dropped than any other endeavor I have ever pursued. Now that this is finished, I’m truly all yours and I look forward to growing old with you. Also thanks to Mara and Rex. My parents, Alexander H. Slocum, Sr. (2) SB ’82, SB ’83, PhD ‘85 and Debra L. T. Slocum (6) SM ’88, for giving me life, teaching me to finish the things that I start, instilling in me both a strong work ethic and the will to succeed, and for showing me the world. Joshua (6) SB ‘10, SM ’11, and Jonathan Slocum (2) SB ’14 – a man could not ask for better brothers. You both have grown into fine men and it is so awesome to see you succeeding. Marianna P. Slocum, (8) SB '55, (18) SM '58 – you told me to never let anyone tell me I couldn’t do something, and I listened. I love you grandma, and I miss you very much. John and Patricia Thurston – Grandma and Grandpa Buffy, you were my inspiration to keep playing the piano. The dexterity and determination I developed will enable me to achieve my dreams. I love you both, and you are missed. Richard W. Slocum, Jr., (Gramps) (8), SB ’55, PhD ’58 – for all those times we went flying together, and our adventures at scout camp. Also, Spirulina! The following is a list of individuals with whom I interacted during the course of this work, and to whom I am grateful: Prof. Lalit Anand, MIT – for his advice and guidance regarding brittle fracture analysis, presented in Chapter 4, Section 4.4.1. Esther Austin, MIT – for her infinite knowledge and for helping me to navigate my time as a nonresident student. Eric Blough, Marshall – for engaging me during the summer and fall of 2011, and allowing me to work in his laboratory on parts of chapter 6. Dr. Mary Bouxsein and Dr. Margaret Seton, HMS – instructors for the IAP 2011 course HST.021 “Musculoskeletal Pathophysiology”. This was my first introduction to the field of orthopaedics; thank you for allowing me to take this course as it served me well during the initial stages of this thesis, and even later during medical school. Brian Brown, RCBI - for laser cutting and fabrication work at the Robert C. Byrd Institute for Advanced Flexible Manufacturing. Dr. Dennis Burke, MGH – for allowing me to observe him in the operating room performing total knee and total hip replacements, and giving me advice on the synthesis of the joint. Tom Cervantes, MIT – one of my UROP students, he helped design the rolling contact testing apparatus used to evaluate the adjustable bone plates, presented as the case study in Chapter 3. 5 Yuehua Cui, MIT – for her guidance and advice on the fabrication of etched and anodized porous coatings, and for her time and efforts in helping Jad and Daniel when I was not there. Prof. Marty Culpepper, MIT – a member of my committee, and my master’s thesis advisor, for your time, thoughts, and guidance over the past 5 years, during which time I have learned a lot from you. I hope to work with you again the future. Tom Dolan – of Dolan’s Welding and Steel Fabrication, for his fantastic laser cutting services and for fabricating the first prototype rolling contact joint. Jad El-Khoury, MIT – one of my UROP students, for his time, dedication, and willingness to learn, and for running countless numbers of lubrication experiments Andrew Gallant, MIT – of the MIT Central Machine Shop, for the excellent, professional service and outstanding product. Central Machine fabricated the components for the passive alignment mechanism used to conduct tribological experiments, and also polished all of the coupons. Prof. Lorna J. Gibson, MIT – taught the spring 2011 course 3.595 – Mechanics of Porous Media, where the ideas on elastic averaging were developed; this became the first half of Chapter 6. Daniel Goodman, MIT – one of my first UROP students, for helping me to design the rheological testing apparatus, for helping me get the first images of the porous coatings, Dr. Rajiv Gupta, MGH – my mentor for my bachelor’s thesis, he helped me to discover my passion for the field of medicine. Dr. Julio Guerrero, DRAPER – a close friend, long-time mentor and advisor. I learned much from you during our time at Schlumberger together. Pierce Hayward, MIT – for his assistance with the Instron used to evaluate the adjustable bone plates, and the white light interferometer. Prof. Doug Hart, MIT – a member of my committee, for your time, thoughts and guidance regarding lubrication and for helping me figure out which experiments to run now and in the future to adequately characterize lubrication. Prof. Just Herder, TU Delft – I can honestly say that without that conversation on April 15 th , 2008, this thesis would most likely not exist. Thank you for your input and advice on this work, and I hope we can continue to collaborate in the future. Dr. Jonathan Hopkins – One of my old lab mates and now a post-doc at LLNL. He pointed out the importance of shear angle in analyzing the slip condition discussed in Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2. Jon also wrote section 5.5. Aditya Jaishankar, MIT – Aditya is a brilliant doctoral student in the Microfluidics laboratory working on rheology of lubricants like synovial fluid, and I am grateful for his time, guidance and expertise in operating the rheometer as well as for all things lubricant-related! Christopher Love, MIT – one of my lab mates, and previously one of my teammates in the Spring 2008 class 2.782, Design of Medical Devices and Implants, and for which I proposed the idea of designing a rolling contact joint for knees.
Recommended publications
  • Synovial Joints Permit Movements of the Skeleton
    8 Joints Lecture Presentation by Lori Garrett © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 1: Joint Structure and Movement Learning Outcomes 8.1 Contrast the major categories of joints, and explain the relationship between structure and function for each category. 8.2 Describe the basic structure of a synovial joint, and describe common accessory structures and their functions. 8.3 Describe how the anatomical and functional properties of synovial joints permit movements of the skeleton. © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 1: Joint Structure and Movement Learning Outcomes (continued) 8.4 Describe flexion/extension, abduction/ adduction, and circumduction movements of the skeleton. 8.5 Describe rotational and special movements of the skeleton. © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. Module 8.1: Joints are classified according to structure and movement Joints, or articulations . Locations where two or more bones meet . Only points at which movements of bones can occur • Joints allow mobility while preserving bone strength • Amount of movement allowed is determined by anatomical structure . Categorized • Functionally by amount of motion allowed, or range of motion (ROM) • Structurally by anatomical organization © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. Module 8.1: Joint classification Functional classification of joints . Synarthrosis (syn-, together + arthrosis, joint) • No movement allowed • Extremely strong . Amphiarthrosis (amphi-, on both sides) • Little movement allowed (more than synarthrosis) • Much stronger than diarthrosis • Articulating bones connected by collagen fibers or cartilage . Diarthrosis (dia-, through) • Freely movable © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc. Module 8.1: Joint classification Structural classification of joints . Fibrous • Suture (sutura, a sewing together) – Synarthrotic joint connected by dense fibrous connective tissue – Located between bones of the skull • Gomphosis (gomphos, bolt) – Synarthrotic joint binding teeth to bony sockets in maxillae and mandible © 2018 Pearson Education, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Traumatologia Hiztegia
    Traumatologia HIZTEGIA KULTURA ETA HIZKUNTZA POLITIKA SAILA DEPARTAMENTO DE CULTURA Y POLÍTICA LINGÜÍSTICA Vitoria-Gasteiz, 2017 Lan honen bibliografia-erregistroa Eusko Jaurlaritzaren Bibliotekak sarearen katalogoan aurki daiteke: http://www.bibliotekak.euskadi.eus/WebOpac Argitaraldia: 1.a, 2017ko xxxx Ale-kopurua: 1.500 ale © argitaraldi honena: Euskal Autonomia Erkidegoko Administrazio Orokorra Argitaratzailea: Eusko Jaurlaritzaren Argitalpen Zerbitzu Nagusia Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco Donostia-San Sebastián, 1 - 01010 Vitoria-Gasteiz Internet: http://www.euskara.euskadi.eus/euskalterm Azala: Concetta Probanza Inprimaketa: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ISBN: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Lege gordailua: XXXXXXXXX HITZAURREA Beste edozein hizkuntza bezalaxe, euskara ere berritzen eta modernizatzen doa egunetik egunera, bizirik dagoen seinale. Bide horretan ezinbestekoa da euskararen aberastasun lexikoa elikatzea, zaintzea eta sustatzea, bai hizkuntza bera normalizatzeko, bai erabiltzaileen premietara egokitzeko. Hain zuzen ere, helburu horiek bete nahian ikusi du argia eskuartean duzun hiztegi honek, orrialde hauetan jorratzen den eremuko erabiltzaile eta hiztunek lanabes erabilgarria izan dezaten beren egunerokoan. Hiztegi honetan aurkituko duzun terminologia Euskararen Aholku Batzordearen Terminologia Batzordeak gomendatutakoa da. Batzordeari dagokio, besteak beste, terminologia-alorrean dauden lehentasunak finkatzea, lan-proposamenak egitea, terminologia- lanerako irizpideak ezartzea, ponderazio-markak finkatuta termino lehiakideen
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Synarthrosis - Immovable
    jAnatomy Lecture Notes Chapter 9 I. classification A. by function - 1. synarthrosis - immovable 2. amphiarthrosis - slightly movable 3. diarthrosis - freely movable B. by structure - material attaching bones together 1. fibrous -.dense c.t., no joint cavity a. suture - very thin, short fibers synostosis - ossification of fibrous c.t. in a suture joint b. syndesmosis - ligament (the longer the fibers the more movement is possible) c. gomphosis - periodontal ligament holds teeth in alveoli 2. cartilaginous - cartilage, no joint cavity a. synchondrosis - hyaline cartilage b. symphysis - fibrocartilage 3. synovial - joint capsule and ligaments II. structure of a synovial joint A. bone and articular cartilage (hyaline) • articular cartilage cushions bone ends by absorbing compression stress Strong/Fall 2008 page 1 jAnatomy Lecture Notes Chapter 9 B. articular capsule 1. fibrous capsule - dense irregular c.t.; holds bones together 2. synovial membrane - areolar c.t. with some simple squamous e.; makes synovial fluid C. joint cavity and synovial fluid 1. synovial fluid consists of: • fluid that is filtered from capillaries in the synovial membrane • glycoprotein molecules that are made by fibroblasts in the synovial membrane 2. fluid lubricates surface of bones inside joint capsule D. ligaments - made of dense fibrous c.t.; strengthen joint • capsular • extracapsular • intracapsular E. articular disc / meniscus - made of fibrocartilage; improves fit between articulating bones F. bursae - membrane sac enclosing synovial fluid found around some joints; cushion ligaments, muscles, tendons, skin, bones G. tendon sheath - elongated bursa that wraps around a tendon Strong/Fall 2008 page 2 jAnatomy Lecture Notes Chapter 9 III. movements at joints flexion extension abduction adduction circumduction rotation inversion eversion protraction retraction supination pronation elevation depression opposition dorsiflexion plantar flexion gliding Strong/Fall 2008 page 3 jAnatomy Lecture Notes Chapter 9 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Gen Anat-Joints
    JOINTS Joint is a junction between two or more bones Classification •Functional Based on the range and type of movement they permit •Structural On the basis of their anatomic structure Functional Classification • Synarthrosis No movement e.g. Fibrous joint • Amphiarthrosis Slight movement e.g. Cartilagenous joint • Diarthrosis Movement present Cavity present Also called as Synovial joint eg.shoulder joint Structural Classification Based on type of connective tissue binding the two adjacent articulating bones Presence or absence of synovial cavity in between the articulating bone • Fibrous • Cartilagenous • Synovial Fibrous Joint Bones are connected to each other by fibrous (connective ) tissue No movement No synovial cavity • Suture • Syndesmosis • Gomphosis Sutural Joints • A thin layer of dens fibrous tissue binds the adjacent bones • These appear between the bones which ossify in membrane • Present between the bones of skull e.g . coronal suture, sagittal suture • Schindylesis: – rigid bone fits in to a groove on a neighbouring bone e.g. Vomer and sphenoid Gomphosis • Peg and socket variety • Cone shaped root of tooth fits in to a socket of jaw • Immovable • Root is attached to the socket by fibrous tissue (periodontal ligament). Syndesmosis • Bony surfaces are bound together by interosseous ligament or membrane • Membrane permits slight movement • Functionally classified as amphiarthrosis e.g. inferior tibiofibular joint Cartilaginous joint • Bones are held together by cartilage • Absence of synovial cavity . Synchondrosis . Symphysis Synchondrosis • Primary cartilaginous joint • Connecting material between two bones is hyaline cartilage • Temporary joint • Immovable joint • After a certain age cartilage is replaced by bone (synostosis) • e.g. Epiphyseal plate connecting epiphysis and diphysis of a long bone, joint between basi-occiput and basi-sphenoid Symphysis • Secondary cartilaginous joint (fibrocartilaginous joint) • Permanent joint • Occur in median plane of the body • Slightly movable • e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Articulations: Synarthrosis and Amphiarthrosis
    Articulations: Synarthrosis and Amphiarthrosis It's common to think of the skeletal system as being made up of only bones, and performing only the function of supporting the body. However, the skeletal system also contains other structures, and performs a variety of functions for the body. While the bones of the skeletal system are fascinating, it is our ability to move segments of the skeleton in relation to one another that allows us to move around. Each connection of bones is called an articulationor a joint. Articulations are classified based on material at the joint and the movement allowed at the joint. Synarthrosis Articulations Immovable articulations are synarthrosis articulations ("syn" means together and "arthrosis" means joint); immovable articulations sounds like a contradiction, but all regions where bones come together are called articulations, so there are articulations that don't move, including in the skull, where bones have fused, and where your teeth meet your jaw. These synarthroses are joined with fibrous connective tissue. Some synarthroses are formed by hyaline cartilage, such as the articulation between the first rib and the sternum (via costal cartilage). This immoveable joint helps stabilize the shoulder girdle and the cartilage can ossify in adults with age. The epiphyseal plate or “growth plate” at the end of long bones is also a synarthrosis until hyaline cartilage ossification is completed around the time of puberty. Amphiarthrosis Articulations There are some articulations which have limited motion called amphiarthrosis articulations. They are held in place with fibrocartilage or fibrous connective tissue. The anterior pelvic girdle joint between pubic bones (pubic symphysis) and the intervertebral joints of the spinal column (discs) are examples of cartilaginous amphiarthroses.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurofibromatosis Type I
    Synovial Diseases in Children A. Carl Merrow, MD Corning Benton Chair for Radiology Education Department of Radiology Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Disclosures • Pediatrics Lead Author for Amirsys-Elsevier – Royalties/Fees • Lecture heavily weighted for MRI Overview • Anatomy • Imaging: Techniques and value • Specific diseases – Etiology – Distribution of joints – Acute & chronic manifestations – Useful imaging clues Anatomy: Types of Joints • Synarthroses (immovable) • Amphiarthrosis (slightly movable) • Diarthrosis (freely movable) Anatomy: Diarthrodial Joints • Cartilage • Capsule – Ligaments – Fibrous tissue • Synovium – Lines capsule, not cartilage – Invests intra-articular ligaments & tendons Anatomy: Synovium • Two layers – Intima • Synovial lining cells (synoviocytes, SLCs) • Discontinuous layer 1-3 cells thick • Incomplete basement membrane – Subintima • Loose connective tissue • Merges with fibrous capsule Anatomy: Synovium • Purposes – Fluid formation – Nutrition of cartilage – Movement Synovium also found… • Bursae • Tendon sheaths • Synovial cysts • NOT synovial sarcoma Joint pathophysiology • Variety of processes may incite synovitis • Single vs. recurrent event destructive cycle • Long term effects – Bone – Articular cartilage – Growing epiphysis Imaging: Why? • Establish diagnosis • Localize/define extent of involvement – Within single joint – Tendon sheath/bursa – Additional unsuspected joints • Pick up complications early • Optimize management General imaging: Radiographs • Pros – Baseline – Exclude other
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Anat 35 Articulations
    Human Anatomy Unit 1 ARTICULATIONS In Anatomy Today Classification of Joints • Criteria – How bones are joined together – Degree of mobility • Minimum components – 2 articulating bones – Intervening tissue • Fibrous CT or cartilage • Categories – Synarthroses – no movement – Amphiarthrosis – slight movement – Diarthrosis – freely movable Synarthrosis • Immovable articulation • Types – Sutures – Schindylesis – Gomphosis – Synchondrosis Synarthrosis Sutures • Found only in skull • Immovable articulation • Flat bones joined by thin layer of fibrous CT • Types – Serrate – Squamous (lap) – Plane Synarthrosis Sutures • Serrate • Serrated edges of bone interlock • Two portions of frontal bones • Squamous (lap) • Overlapping beveled margins forms smooth line • Temporal and parietal bones • Plane • Joint formed by straight, nonoverlapping edges • Palatine process of maxillae Synarthrosis Schindylesis • Immovable articulation • Thin plate of bone into cleft or fissure in a separation of the laminae in another bone • Articulation of sphenoid bone and perpendicular plate of ethmoid bone with vomer Synarthrosis Gomphosis • Immovable articulation • Conical process into a socket • Articulation of teeth with alveoli of maxillary bone • Periodontal ligament = fibrous CT Synarthrosis Synchondrosis • Cartilagenous joints – Ribs joined to sternum by hyaline cartilage • Synostoses – When joint ossifies – Epiphyseal plate becomes epiphyseal line Amphiarthrosis • Slightly moveable articulation • Articulating bones connected in one of two ways: – By broad flattened
    [Show full text]
  • FIPAT-TA2-Part-2.Pdf
    TERMINOLOGIA ANATOMICA Second Edition (2.06) International Anatomical Terminology FIPAT The Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology A programme of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) TA2, PART II Contents: Systemata musculoskeletalia Musculoskeletal systems Caput II: Ossa Chapter 2: Bones Caput III: Juncturae Chapter 3: Joints Caput IV: Systema musculare Chapter 4: Muscular system Bibliographic Reference Citation: FIPAT. Terminologia Anatomica. 2nd ed. FIPAT.library.dal.ca. Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology, 2019 Published pending approval by the General Assembly at the next Congress of IFAA (2019) Creative Commons License: The publication of Terminologia Anatomica is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license The individual terms in this terminology are within the public domain. Statements about terms being part of this international standard terminology should use the above bibliographic reference to cite this terminology. The unaltered PDF files of this terminology may be freely copied and distributed by users. IFAA member societies are authorized to publish translations of this terminology. Authors of other works that might be considered derivative should write to the Chair of FIPAT for permission to publish a derivative work. Caput II: OSSA Chapter 2: BONES Latin term Latin synonym UK English US English English synonym Other 351 Systemata Musculoskeletal Musculoskeletal musculoskeletalia systems systems
    [Show full text]
  • Synovial Joints
    Chapter 9 Lecture Outline See separate PowerPoint slides for all figures and tables pre- inserted into PowerPoint without notes. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Introduction • Joints link the bones of the skeletal system, permit effective movement, and protect the softer organs • Joint anatomy and movements will provide a foundation for the study of muscle actions 9-2 Joints and Their Classification • Expected Learning Outcomes – Explain what joints are, how they are named, and what functions they serve. – Name and describe the four major classes of joints. – Describe the three types of fibrous joints and give an example of each. – Distinguish between the three types of sutures. – Describe the two types of cartilaginous joints and give an example of each. – Name some joints that become synostoses as they age. 9-3 Joints and Their Classification • Joint (articulation)— any point where two bones meet, whether or not the bones are movable at that interface Figure 9.1 9-4 Joints and Their Classification • Arthrology—science of joint structure, function, and dysfunction • Kinesiology—the study of musculoskeletal movement – A branch of biomechanics, which deals with a broad variety of movements and mechanical processes 9-5 Joints and Their Classification • Joint name—typically derived from the names of the bones involved (example: radioulnar joint) • Joints classified according to the manner in which the bones are bound to each other • Four major joint categories – Bony joints – Fibrous
    [Show full text]
  • Vocabulario De Medicina
    Vocabulario de Medicina (galego-español-inglés-portugués) Servizo de Normalización Lingüística Universidade de Santiago de Compostela COLECCIÓN DE VOCABULARIOS TEMÁTICOS N.º 5 SERVIZO DE NORMALIZACIÓN LINGÜÍSTICA Vocabulario de Medicina (galego-español-inglés-portugués) 2008 UNIVERSIDADE DE SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA VOCABULARIO de medicina : (galego-español-inglés-portugués) /coordinador Xusto A. Rodríguez Río, Servizo de Normalización Lingüística ; autores María Casas García ... [et al.]. — Santiago de Compostela : Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Servizo de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico, 2008. — 851 p. ; 21 cm. — (Vocabularios temáticos ; 5). — D.L.C 3806-2008. — ISBN 978-84-9887-028-2 1. Medicina-Diccionarios. 2. Galego (Lingua)-Glosarios, vocabularios, etc. políglotas. I.Rodríguez Río, Xusto A., coord. II.Casas García María. III.Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Servizo de Normalización Lingüística, coord. IV. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Servizo de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico, ed. V.Serie. 61(038)=699=60=20=690 © Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2008 Coordinador: Xusto A. Rodríguez Río (Área de Terminoloxía. Servizo de Normalización Lingüística. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) Autoras/res: María Casas García (Área de Medicina Familiar e Comunitaria. Unidade Docente de Pontevedra. Centro de Saúde de Bueu) Sonia Miguélez Ferreiro (Área de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria. Unidad Docente de Segovia. Centro de Salud Segovia 1) Carolina Pena Álvarez (Área de Oncoloxía Médica. Complexo Hospitalario de Pontevedra) Iria Pereira Fernández (Escola Universitària d’Infermeria. Universitat de Barcelona) Adriana Rubín Barrenechea (Hospital Amato Lusitano. Castelo Branco. Portugal) Sabela Sánchez Trigo (Área de Medicina Interna. Complexo Hospitalario Arquitecto Marcide - Nóvoa Santos. Ferrol) Xoana María Vázquez Vicente (Servei d’Aparell Digestiu.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartilaginous Joints*
    OpenStax-CNX module: m46381 1 Cartilaginous Joints* OpenStax This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 Abstract By the end of this section, you will be able to: • Describe the structural features of cartilaginous joints • Distinguish between a synchondrosis and symphysis • Give an example of each type of cartilaginous joint As the name indicates, at a cartilaginous joint, the adjacent bones are united by cartilage, a tough but exible type of connective tissue. These types of joints lack a joint cavity and involve bones that are joined together by either hyaline cartilage or brocartilage (Figure 1 (Cartiliginous Joints )). There are two types of cartilaginous joints. A synchondrosis is a cartilaginous joint where the bones are joined by hyaline cartilage. Also classied as a synchondrosis are places where bone is united to a cartilage structure, such as between the anterior end of a rib and the costal cartilage of the thoracic cage. The second type of cartilaginous joint is a symphysis, where the bones are joined by brocartilage. *Version 1.3: Jun 4, 2013 10:16 am -0500 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://cnx.org/content/m46381/1.3/ OpenStax-CNX module: m46381 2 Cartiliginous Joints Figure 1: At cartilaginous joints, bones are united by hyaline cartilage to form a synchondrosis or by brocartilage to form a symphysis. (a) The hyaline cartilage of the epiphyseal plate (growth plate) forms a synchondrosis that unites the shaft (diaphysis) and end (epiphysis) of a long bone and allows the bone to grow in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Joints of the Skeletal System
    Unit 2 Lecture 5 Unit 2 Lecture 7 JOINTS OF THE SKELETAL SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS (Articulations between Bones) In Fibrous joints there is no joint cavity and the bones are held together by fibrous connective tissue; these joints are Immovable and are also known as Syntharthrosis. Sutures: a fibrous joint, thin layer of dense fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones of the skull; becomes a synostosis in adult (by complete fusion of bones across joint. Syndesmosis: a fibrous joint that has more fibrous connective tissue (example is joint between distal articulation of tibia and fibula). Gomphosis: a cone shaped peg fits into a socket (roots of teeth). Bones held together by cartilage in cartilaginous joints. These are slightly movable joint and are also called Amphiarthrosis. Synchondrosis: a cartilaginous joint in which the connecting joint is hyaline cartilage, this is only a temporary joint. Symphysis: a broad flat disc of fibrocartilage (outer area of intervertebral discs and pubic symphysis are examples). In a Synovial joint, a synovial cavity is present. Bones forming joint are united by a surrounding articular capsule and frequently ligaments. Synovial joints are also known as Diarthrosis or freely movable joints. Many diarthroses also contain articular discs (menisci) and bursa. The factors that affect movement of diarthroses include its structure or shape of the articulating bones, which determines how they fit together, the strength and tension of the joint ligaments, the arrangement and tension of the muscles, the apposition of the soft parts may limit mobility (bent elbow) and the presence of hormones (relaxin). Types of Synovial Joints Ball-and-socket: ball-like surface of one bone fits into cuplike depression of another bone, triaxial movement (hip and shoulder).
    [Show full text]