DOCSLIB.ORG

M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments Integrating C.STATUSTM and the Mediasense

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments Integrating C.STATUSTM and the Mediasense M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments Integrating C.STATUSTM and the MediaSense 10/12/2012 MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY The Department of Information Technology and Media (ITM) Author: Addisu Thomas Lodamo, [email protected] Tutors: Stefan Forsström, Miun,[email protected] Examiner: Prof. Tingting Zhang, [email protected] Medical Monitoring Services Home Security automation Services Services Energy Entertainment Consumption Services services e y t a a W G The Internet M.Sc. Thesis within Computer Engineering AV, 30 Credit Points M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments Integrating C.STATUSTM and the MediaSense Addisu Lodamo M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments Abstract Addisu Lodamo 2012-11-11 Abstract Digital technological breakthroughs have brought about a huge change in the way the society interacts, responds to the immediate environment and the way that people live. Furthermore, Ubiquitous Computing and dirt cheap sensors have created a new paradigm in digital technology where human beings could control their environment in a different approach. In a number of paradigms of digital technology, multiple proprietary solutions in industry results in a huge cost for the end users to use the technology and thus a very sluggish penetration of the tech- nology into the society. Moreover, such unorganized and vendor ori- ented standards create additional burdens on a person concerned in design and implementation. This thesis presents existing and emerging technologies in relation to smart home environment having an aim to manifest available open standards and platforms. Smart Home Envi- ronment Infrastructures have been presented and discussed. Evaluation and integration of a proprietary elderly care sensor system dubbed C.STATUSTM and the MediaSense overlay network has also been pre- sented. Performance measurement and comparison has been conducted in relation to the proprietary sensor system running on the top of the peer-to-peer MediaSense Platform with the existing C.STATUSTM cen- tralized sensor system. C.STATUSTM User Interface has been designed and implemented for an Android mobile platform. iii M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments Acknowledgements Addisu Lodamo 2012-11-11 Acknowledgements I would like to pass gratitude to all who participated in this thesis work by forwarding new ideas, comments, suggestions, advice and necessary resources on the technologies presented. Nevertheless, I would like to give special gratitude to my tutor Olle Johnsson who is a researcher at Acreo for providing me with devices to work on and other valuable information in addition to excellent supervision. I would also like to pass a warm gratitude to the other tutor, Stefan Forsström, a PhD Stu- dent at Mid Sweden University for providing me with both tools and guidance throughout the period of this thesis work. iv M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments Table of Contents Addisu Lodamo 2012-11-11 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background and problem motivation ...................................... 1 1.2 Overall aim ................................................................................... 2 1.3 Concrete and verifiable goals .................................................... 2 1.4 Outline .......................................................................................... 3 1.5 Scope ............................................................................................. 4 2 Theory ...................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Wireless M2M Technologies ...................................................... 6 2.1.1 Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) .......................................... 6 2.1.2 IrDA (Infrared Data Association) ................................... 6 2.1.3 Zigbee / IEEE 802.15.4 ...................................................... 7 2.1.4 Z-Wave ............................................................................... 8 2.1.5 Dash7 .................................................................................. 8 2.1.6 INSTEON ........................................................................... 8 2.1.7 ONE-NET .......................................................................... 9 2.1.8 CEBus /EIA-600 ................................................................. 9 2.1.9 RuBee ................................................................................ 10 2.2 Wired M2M Technologies ........................................................ 10 2.2.1 USB ................................................................................... 10 2.2.2 FireWire ........................................................................... 11 2.2.3 X10 .................................................................................... 11 2.2.4 HomePNA / HPNA ........................................................ 11 2.2.5 G.hn .................................................................................. 11 2.3 Existing Wireless Sensor Network Platforms ....................... 12 2.3.1 MyriaNed......................................................................... 12 2.3.2 ANT/ANT+ ...................................................................... 13 2.3.3 WirelessHART ................................................................ 13 2.3.4 TinyOS .............................................................................. 14 2.3.5 Contiki .............................................................................. 14 2.4 Middleware Technologies ........................................................ 15 2.4.1 OSGi ................................................................................. 15 2.4.2 UPnP ................................................................................. 15 2.4.3 KNX Technology ............................................................ 15 2.4.4 The MediaSense Platform ............................................. 16 3 Methodology ........................................................................................ 17 v M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments Table of Contents Addisu Lodamo 2012-11-11 3.1 Current Trends in the Smart Home Infrastructure .............. 17 3.2 The MediaSense Platform and Sensagon’s Proprietary Sensor System ............................................................................ 18 3.3 Android App Design ................................................................ 18 3.4 Analysis and Evaluation .......................................................... 18 4 Technologies for Smart Home Environment and Trends ........... 20 4.1 Smart Home Environment Affiliated Protocols Comparisons .............................................................................. 21 4.2 Smart Home Environment Infrastructure ............................. 26 4.3 Possible Future Trends ............................................................. 28 5 Implementing the Smart Home ........................................................ 31 5.1 Sensagon’s Elderly Care Sensor Network ............................. 33 5.1.1 The Interface Layer ......................................................... 34 5.1.2 The Service Layer ........................................................... 36 5.1.3 The Data Acquisition Layer .......................................... 37 5.2 C.STATUSTM Sensor System on Top of the MediaSense platform ...................................................................................... 37 5.2.1 Implementing the Interface Layer ................................ 38 5.2.2 Implementing the Service Layer .................................. 39 6 Results ................................................................................................... 42 6.1 Sensagon on the top of the MediaSense Platform ................ 43 6.2 Performance Comparison ........................................................ 44 6.3 C.STATUSTM and Web Services on Linux Server .................. 46 6.3.1 Android App Evaluation............................................... 48 7 Conclusions .......................................................................................... 52 7.1 Future work ................................................................................ 53 References ........................................................................................................ 54 vi M2M Protocols, Solutions and Platforms for Smart Home Environments 1 Introduction Addisu Lodamo 2012-11-11 1 Introduction Modern Smartphones come with bunch of cheap and powerful embed- ded sensors. In addition, each year the computing power of the smart- phones keeps increasing. More importantly, these smart devices are programmable thus allowing developers from all corners of the earth to build different applications. This has meant that smartphones are be- coming the central computing and communication devices for use in day-to-day human life; and due to the prevalence of dirt cheap sensors, a new paradigm of wireless sensory networks is immerging in one direction. In the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Internet of Things Network Study
    Internet of Things Network Study By Masters in Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Research Advisor Dan Cregg Team members Ta-Yu Chiu Neha Sadhvi Yidi Fan Ricky Yang Contents 1.Thesis Statement 3 2. Introduction 3 3. Objectives 3 4. Equipment and Devices 3 5. Network Protocols in Study 4 6. Testing Environment 6 7. Number of devices under Test 6 8. Network Layer Frequency 6 9. Physical Layer Frequency 6 10. Test Setup 7 11. Results 8 12. Constraints 13 13. Conclusion 14 14. References 14 15. Acknowledgements 15 16. Contacts 15 1.Thesis Statement As the use of smart embedded devices grows in our daily life, current networking technologies are expected to be strained beyond their original intent. Consumers face unacceptable performance as nodes are increased and network bandwidth is consumed in physically constraining environments. Various network types and use cases, thus, are explored to determine current failure points in common IoT home smart devices. 2. Introduction At the time of this report, there has been an unprecedented uptake in the use of ‘smart’ devices in the home. The introduction of voice recognition platforms such as Google Home and Amazon Alexa has fueled the use of small, inexpensive, connected sensing and control devices. Controls for Heating and Air Conditioning have been popular, as well as various sensors for doors, windows, etc.. Perhaps the most pervasive has been the acceptance of these types of systems for lighting control. Due to the sheer number of nodes available in a home, lighting nodes to be controlled is very large. This research will focus on various types of network technologies with the goal of physically simulating small to large sets of devices to determine acceptable response time.
    [Show full text]
  • A DASH7-Based Power Metering System
    A DASH7-based Power Metering System Oktay Cetinkaya Ozgur B. Akan Next-generation and Wireless Communications Laboratory Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey Email: fokcetinkaya13, [email protected] Abstract—Considering the inability of the existing energy non-embedded structure. When considering the cost of HEMS, resources to satisfy the current needs, the right and efficient use power meters can be defined as cheap and cost effective of the energy has become compulsory. To make energy sustain- products, undoubtedly. ability permanent, management and planning activities should be carried out by arranging the working hours and decreasing There are several wireless communication protocols in liter- the energy wasting. For all these, power metering, managing ature to actualize the remote control of plugged gadgets. The and controlling systems or plugs has been proposed in recent communication between ‘master and slave’ or equivalently efforts. Starting from this point, a new DASH7-based Smart Plug ‘user and device’ is realized over any of these wireless (D7SP) is designed and implemented to achieve a better structure communication protocols based modules. 2.4 GHz frequency compared to ZigBee equipped models and reduce the drawbacks of current applications. DASH7 technology reaches nearly 6 times is frequently preferred for this goal and ZigBee can be referred farther distances in comparison with 2.4 GHz based protocols and as the most popular member of this band. With a brief provides multi-year battery life as a result of using limited energy definition, ZigBee is a low cost and high reliable technology during transmission. Performing in the 433 MHz band prevents based on IEEE 802.15.4 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Internet of Underground Things in Precision Agriculture: Architecture and Technology Aspects Mehmet C
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln CSE Journal Articles Computer Science and Engineering, Department of 2018 Internet of underground things in precision agriculture: Architecture and technology aspects Mehmet C. Vuran University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Abdul Salam Purdue University, [email protected] Rigoberto Wong University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Suat Irmak University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/csearticles Part of the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, Computer and Systems Architecture Commons, Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering Commons, and the Robotics Commons Vuran, Mehmet C.; Salam, Abdul; Wong, Rigoberto; and Irmak, Suat, "Internet of underground things in precision agriculture: Architecture and technology aspects" (2018). CSE Journal Articles. 189. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/csearticles/189 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Computer Science and Engineering, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in CSE Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. digitalcommons.unl.edu Internet of underground things in precision agriculture: Architecture and technology aspects Mehmet C. Vuran,1 Abdul Salam,2 Rigoberto Wong,1 and Suat Irmak 3 1 Cyber-physical Networking Laboratory, Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA 2 Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA 3 Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA Corresponding author — A. Salam, [email protected] Email addresses: [email protected] (M.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Communication Technologies for Smart Homes/Building Applications
    Accepted for presentation at the 2015 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT-ASIA). Bangkok, Thailand. November 4-6, 2015. 1 Review of Communication Technologies for Smart Homes/Building Applications M. Kuzlu, Senior Member, IEEE, M. Pipattanasomporn, Senior Member, IEEE, and S. Rahman, Fellow, IEEE 1Virginia Tech – Advanced Research Institute, Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] frequency. Therefore, communication requirements for CPN Abstract— A customer premises network (CPN) is a critical applications are typically low power consumption, low cost, element to support messaging exchange among smart meters, an simplicity, and secure communications. energy management unit, load controllers, smart appliances and Typical smart grid applications in a CPN, such as HEM, electric vehicles in a smart home/building environment. Smart metering, demand response, etc., are discussed in [3, 4, 5]. In grid applications in a CPN generally are driven by the need for [6], authors propose a comprehensive assessment of various Home/Building Energy Management Systems (HEM/BEM). communication technologies for CPNs and develop an Design of an effective energy management system requires the approach for selecting suitable technologies for demand selection of a proper communication technology. The objective of response applications. A contemporary look at the current state this paper is to compare commonly used wired and wireless of the art in smart grid communications and networking communication technologies for smart grid applications in a premises area network in terms of their standard/protocol, technologies as well as assess their suitability for deployment maximum data rate, coverage range, and adaptation rate. These to serve various smart grid applications are discussed in [7, 8].
    [Show full text]
  • How Smart Tvs, Smart Cars, Smart Homes, and Smart Cities Are Changing the World
    The Internet of Things How Smart TVs, Smart Cars, Smart Homes, and Smart Cities Are Changing the World MICHAEL MILLER 800 East 96th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 USA The Internet of Things Editor-in-Chief How Smart TVs, Smart Cars, Smart Homes, and Greg Wiegand Smart Cities Are Changing the World Executive Editor Copyright © 2015 by Pearson Education, Inc. Rick Kughen All rights reserved. No part of this book shall be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechani- Managing Editor cal, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permis- Sandra Schroeder sion from the publisher. No patent liability is assumed with respect to the use of the information contained herein. Although every precau- Senior Project Editor tion has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher and author assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. Nor is any Tonya Simpson liability assumed for damages resulting from the use of the informa- Copy Editor tion contained herein. Anne Goebel ISBN-13: 978-0-7897-5400-4 ISBN-10: 0-7897-5400-2 Indexer Library of Congress Control Number: 2015932632 Erika Millen Printed in the United States of America Proofreader Jess DeGabriele First Printing: April 2015 Trademarks Technical Editor Gareth Branwyn All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Que Publishing Publishing Coordinator cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this Kristin Watterson book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark.
    [Show full text]
  • PLCBUS-3160M Manuel US
    PLCBUS-R 3160M Shutter In-Line Module How does PLCBUS work ? Power line Communication Bus (PLCBUS) is a highly reliable, cost effective, 2-way communications technology which enables control products to utilize existing power lines for both residential and commercial applications. The most main feature of PLCBUS Technology is no any Filter and block necessary. • Modules : These components will receive PLCBUS signals and will switch or dim the attached lamp or appliance, and then feedback current status. • Controllers : These components will transmit PLC BUS signals and thus will control the Modules ; 2-way Communications. • Transceivers : Wireless components like remotes (433.92MHz). The signals of these components will be received by a controller wit h transceiver functionally (PLCBUS- T4023UK ). The Transceiver will translate the signals into PLCBUS signals on the power line. Addresses You can select up to 256 addresses by code set electronically. Each address is dividing into a House Code (A – P) and a Unit Code (1 – 16). On control the House code is also selectable. When Modules and Controllers are set to the same House Code, they will work together. The PLCBUS System contains many standardized commands where by modules set to the same House Code will respond simultaneously (e. g. All Lights On, All Units Off). For installer : To different families , PLC US also provide additional 250 User Codes (1 – 250 ). When you install for many houses in the same building, for each family, you should set a different User Code. Thus, 250User Codes x 256 Addresses = 64000 Addresses totally. 250 User Codes x 256 (House/Unit Codes) (1…250) (A…P / 1…16) (For 250 different families) (In each family) Signal Range I.
    [Show full text]
  • RT-Druid Reference Manual
    RT-Druid reference manual A tool for the design of embedded real-time systems version: 1.5.0 December 11, 2012 About Evidence S.r.l. Evidence is a spin-off company of the ReTiS Lab of the Scuola Superiore S. Anna, Pisa, Italy. We are experts in the domain of embedded and real-time systems with a deep knowledge of the design and specification of embedded SW. We keep providing signifi- cant advances in the state of the art of real-time analysis and multiprocessor scheduling. Our methodologies and tools aim at bringing innovative solutions for next-generation embedded systems architectures and designs, such as multiprocessor-on-a-chip, recon- figurable hardware, dynamic scheduling and much more! Contact Info Address: Evidence Srl, Via Carducci 56 Localit`aGhezzano 56010 S.Giuliano Terme Pisa - Italy Tel: +39 050 991 1122, +39 050 991 1224 Fax: +39 050 991 0812, +39 050 991 0855 For more information on Evidence Products, please send an e-mail to the following address: [email protected]. Other informations about the Evidence product line can be found at the Evidence web site at: http://www.evidence.eu.com. This document is Copyright 2005-2012 Evidence S.r.l. Information and images contained within this document are copyright and the property of Evidence S.r.l. All trademarks are hereby acknowledged to be the properties of their respective owners. The information, text and graphics contained in this document are provided for information purposes only by Evidence S.r.l. Evidence S.r.l. does not warrant the accuracy, or completeness of the information, text, and other items contained in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Working Papers\11156.Wpd
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE RULES OF STANDARD SETTING ORGANIZATIONS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS Benjamin Chiao Josh Lerner Jean Tirole Working Paper 11156 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11156 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2005 Harvard Business School and the National Science Foundation provided financial support. We thank seminar participants at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago/Kellogg “Standards and Public Policy” conference, Melbourne Business School, and the IDEI Conference on the Economics of the Internet and Software Industries for helpful comments, as well as Ken Krechmer, Mark Lemley, and Halla Yang. Research support was provided by Aurora Bryant, Vicky Chang, Seung-ju Paik, Mimi Tam, and Olga Trzebinska. All errors are our own.The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2005 by Benjamin Chiao, Josh Lerner, and Jean Tirole. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Rules of Standard Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis Benjamin Chiao, Josh Lerner, and Jean Tirole NBER Working Paper No. 11156 February 2005 JEL No. L2, O3 ABSTRACT This paper empirically explores the procedures employed by standard-setting organizations. Consistent with Lerner-Tirole (2004), we find (a) a negative relationship between the extent to which an SSO is oriented to technology sponsors and the concession level required of sponsors and (b) a positive correlation between the sponsor-friendliness of the selected SSO and the quality of the standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Americas Smart Homes Market – by Products, Services & Geography
    MarketsandMarkets http://www.marketresearch.com/MarketsandMarkets-v3719/ Publisher Sample Phone: 800.298.5699 (US) or +1.240.747.3093 or +1.240.747.3093 (Int'l) Hours: Monday - Thursday: 5:30am - 6:30pm EST Fridays: 5:30am - 5:30pm EST Email: [email protected] MarketResearch.com AMERICAS SMART HOME MARKET By Products (Security, Access, Lighting, Entertainment, Energy Management, HVAC, and Ballast & Battery Pack), Services (Installation & Repair, Renovation & Customization) & Geography Analysis & Forecasts (2013 – 2020) MarketsandMarkets [email protected] www.marketsandmarkets.com Americas Smart Homes Market – By Products, Services & Geography - Analysis & Forecast (2013 – 2020) MarketsandMarkets is a global market research and consulting company based in the U.S. We publish strategically analyzed market research reports and serve as a business intelligence partner to Fortune 500 companies across the world. MarketsandMarkets also provides multi-client reports, company profiles, databases, and custom research services. MarketsandMarkets covers thirteen industry verticals, including advanced materials, automotive and transportation, banking and financial services, biotechnology, chemicals, consumer goods, energy and power, food and beverages, industrial automation, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, semiconductor and electronics, and telecommunications and IT. Copyright © 2013 MarketsandMarkets All Rights Reserved. This document contains highly confidential information and is the sole property of MarketsandMarkets. No part of it may be circulated, copied, quoted, or otherwise reproduced without the approval of MarketsandMarkets. MarketsandMarkets Sample Pages | 1 Americas Smart Homes Market – By Products, Services & Geography - Analysis & Forecast (2013 – 2020) 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 KEY TAKE-AWAY • Americas Smart Homes Market by products, services, and geography market statistics with detailed classifications and splits by revenue. • Analysis of the Americas Smart Homes market by products with a special focus on high growth areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 Wireless Sensor Nodes
    Chapter 14 Wireless Sensor Nodes Serge Chaumette and Damien Sauveron Abstract This chapter addresses the key points of wireless sensor nodes: applica- tions, constraints, architecture, operating systems, and security concerns. It does not pretend to be exhaustive but to provide the major references on these topics. 14.1 Introduction Huge advances in Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and Wireless commu- nications in the last decade of the twentieth century gave birth to new paradigms, where cheap, small size communicating sensors have been developed and integrated in many devices and large hardware/software environments. In this chapter, we target standalone wireless sensing devices, so-called wireless sensor nodes, which means that we focus on the device itself and not on the way it can be integrated within a global wireless sensor network. These small hardware pieces are becoming a key component of the digitization of the real world, thanks to their ease of deployment and the benefits that they can bring to human life in general, like infrastructure man- agement (such as power grids) and environmental protection for instance. They are quite different from expensive isolated sensors (i.e., not intended to be a part of a whole swarm) and achieve complex measurements (related to a given phenomenon), and subsequent computation operations. Indeed, the strength of small sensor nodes is their ability to self-organize as a large network which enables measurement very close to a possibly dangerous phenomenon. They can cover a wide area and so are able to observe the evolution and spreading of complex events. In Sect.14.2 we S.
    [Show full text]
  • Zigbee, Bluetooth LE, Enocean, Wavenis, Insteon and UWB *Ms
    Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Recent Trends In Computing and Communication Engineering -- RTCCE 2013 Copyright © Institute of Research Engineers and Doctors. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-981-07-6184-4 doi:10.3850/ 978-981-07-6184-4_60 A Comparative Study of Wireless Technologies: Zigbee, Bluetooth LE, Enocean, Wavenis, Insteon and UWB *Ms. Harneet kaur, #Ms. Sukesha Sharma Abstract-The major design challenge of home automation is to powered and battery less with low power radio frequency choose best standard for controlling devices in existing home (RF). Radio frequency having a biggest advantage over environments without any changes in infrastructure. In recent infrared (IR) that new devices can easily be added or removed years Zigbee was the promising technology for home from the network. Individual devices forming a network and automation. But, nowadays there are some other standards all are working together in harmony. After forming a network which give their best for controlling home devices. This paper presents an overview of different wireless communication there are certain events that takes place like manual events, standards by comparing their main features in terms of various timed events and triggered events. All devices are connected metrics such as range, frequency band, maximum node count, to common network and controlled by a central regulation security, and cost. and control unit. There are three types of controls systems such as: -Individually control system: Only one appliance or function Keywords: Wireless technologies, Bluetooth LE, Zigbee, is controlled in these systems. For example a remote control Enocean, Insteon, Wavenis, UWB. unit. -Distributed control systems: Controller elements are not in Introduction central location in these systems, they are distributed In today’s life because of huge amount of standards available throughout the network and controlled by one or more in the market choosing the best one is the biggest challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Control Assistant Version 12 Appendixes
    Home Control Assistant Version 12 Appendixes WWW.HCATech.com The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. Advanced Quonset Technology, Inc. provides this information “as is” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, but not limited to the implied warranty of mechantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Advanced Quonset Technology, Inc. may improve or change the product at any time without further notice; this document does not represent a commitment on the part of Advanced Quonset Technology, Inc. The software described in this document is furnished under a license agreement or nondisclosure agreement. The software may be used or copied only in accordance with the terms of the licensing agreement. Windows is a registered trademark, and Windows NT is a trademark of Microsoft Corporation. All other product names and services identified in this document are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies and are used throughout this document in editorial fashion only and for the benefit of such companies. No such uses, or the use of any trade name, is intended to convey an endorsement or other affiliation with Advanced Quonset Technology, Inc. © 2001-2013 Advanced Quonset Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. November 15, 2013 Appendix 1 HCA versions and Interface Support..........................................................................................................1 Appendix 2 CM11 / CM15 ............................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]