Speech by Martin Schulz, Party Chairman, at the Extraordinary SPD

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Speech by Martin Schulz, Party Chairman, at the Extraordinary SPD Berlin, 25 June 2017 140/17 Press release Speech by Martin Schulz, Party Chairman, At the extraordinary SPD party conference On 25 June 2017 in Dortmund Comrades, friends, guests! Welcome to the Social Democratic Party of Germany’s extraordinary party conference, at which we want to adopt our government programme for the next legislative period. It is a government programme that we have all worked on. We discussed this programme at all levels – passionately, and at times our debates were very heated. We have worked hard for two years so that today, we can adopt a programme that contains the very best policy approaches for our country and its future. Let me tell you – I am proud of our work and I am grateful to everyone who invested a great deal of work, strength and commitment in this process. I think that we will adopt a programme that we can be proud of. Before we adopt the programme, however, I would like to tell you a story, comrades. It is the story of asymmetrical demobilisation. In 2009, a well-known pollster gave Angela Merkel a piece of strategic advice: “Don’t say anything. Don’t take a stance on anything. Don’t commit to any concrete position.” I must admit, it was a successful strategy. Whilst we social democrats present policy proposals and take stances in all election campaigns, whilst we engage in public debates and discussion with our ideas, the other side remains silent – “Angela Merkel is there, that’s enough”. It was a successful model in 2009, and again in 2013 – but not in 2017! I am not telling this story simply by chance, the story of asymmetrical demobilisation. I am well aware of why I am telling it. Everyone should be fully aware of the implication when a centre of government, the headquarters of a governing party systematically decides to refuse to debate a country’s future, when it says: We’ll willingly accept the fact that people are not voting. On the contrary: “Let’s encourage this fall in voter turnout, because we know that declining voter participation has a negative impact on the others”. When the headquarters of a party and a centre of government systematically and intentionally encourages falling voter turnout as a campaign tactic, then in Berlin they may call it asymmetrical demobilisation, I call it an attack on democracy. Comrades, delegates, thank you for coming in such vast numbers, for we have 6,000 guests today, all of whom are ready to fight his election campaign with commitment, passion and strength. Since January, 20,000 people have joined the SPD. 20,000! The last time such a wave of new members joined was in 1998. The people who have joined us come from all of the regions in our country, they come from all groups of the population and from all generations. Many of them are engaging in politics for the first time, keen to work with all of us to get things moving, people who overcame any doubts they may have had and decided to go for it with all their heart, saying: I’m in! For many of them it is their first SPD party conference here in Halls of Westphalia. I would like to wish you a particularly warm welcome, new comrades! But why have so many joined us now, to get involved and work with us? I think it is because they, like all of us, sense that there is a profound reason to get to work now, to join us in our efforts now. An epochal change is taking place and we can all sense it. Which issues characterise this change? What is this change comprised of? First of all, we have the question of how we can draw on innovative technological and economic advancements to bring about social progress. Secondly, how can we ensure social cohesion in a time of rapid change, how do we create security amid this change whilst also guaranteeing justice. Thirdly, and I believe this to be key, we have the question of our continent’s destiny. It is about how we strengthen our democratic Europe. It is about how we guarantee peace in a world in which peace is at risk. Comrades, many people are grappling with these three large issues. And in view of these issues, many people want to become involved. Many have seen that a better future will not come about on its own. And they have chosen the social democrats. For our task has always been to safeguard people’s dignity in times of great upheaval, to shape progress and to make sure that the human being, the individual person, every man, woman and child is placed at the heart of this change and this progress. That – safeguarding human dignity as progress takes place – is the mission of social democracy, it is the SPD’s mission. During the period of industrialisation, our party stood up to the untamed forces of capitalism. But such untamed forces continue to exert an effect in the 21st century. However, today their impact is global. These forces destroy the environment. They speculate unscrupulously on the stock markets, for example on food. For they know that food shortages drive up prices for foodstuffs. This leads to some people’s hunger serving another people’s profit. What a perverse system we have to stand up to! They sell weapons and accept the fact that their ruthless exploitation destabilises entire regions. They willingly accept wars, crises and hunger as consequences of their action. The People’s Republic of China participates in this global development as much as the United States of America and, unfortunately, we Europeans as well. This kind of policy leads to migratory flows that will not stop, that are inhumane and that turn the Mediterranean into a mass grave. The power of maximising profit with no regard for the consequences is destroying human dignity. In the 21st century, the task incumbent upon social democracy is to civilise these forces. Our task is to tackle this change. Our task is to address this change, accept that it is happening and make it a positive development. Our fundamental values of freedom, justice and solidarity will serve as our compass as we do so. It is specifically because the world is moving faster, because it is changing from day to day, that we are standing by these fundamental values. Yes, sometimes people tell us that this is a bit old fashioned and somewhat antiquated. But no, quite the opposite, in a changing world, these basic values of freedom, justice and solidarity give us strength, direction and hope. Anyone who today tries to get by without a compass will lose their bearings. And if a person loses their bearings, they lose their future. But the CDU and the CSU want to muddle through. We have a different programme that we will be adopting today! In our time, we are facing a huge challenge in digitalisation. It is changing nearly all areas of our society, our lives and our daily routines. It will determine how we live. It already determines how we communicate. It will determine how we work, how we do business, how we shape freedom and democracy. We must all be clear about the fact that digitalisation is a political matter. Our aspiration must be to make sure that the technical progress brought by digitalisation also translates into social progress. Our aim must be to set limits where developments take the wrong direction, where unhindered commercialisation and also totalitarian trends undermine our social model, where people are objectified, made into data providers with ears. However, our aim must also be to seize the opportunities offered by digitalisation, opportunities for emancipation, participation and social advancement. In recent months, I have spoken to many creatives and I repeatedly heard them say: if you want digital start-ups in Germany to be successful then we need nothing less than a culture change in our country. If we engage with it in the right way, then digitalisation helps create new, well-paid and decent jobs. Then it helps people to better reconcile their family and work lives. Then it helps us to improve our healthcare system. Then it helps us to better connect cities and the countryside through better mobility. Then it helps us to create new opportunities for education. But we do not want to focus solely on what is technically possible or even on what generates the highest profit. No, also in this field, we want to place people and individuals, each and every one of us at the heart of the change. That is why I am so grateful to the unions, to the many committed colleagues active on works councils, who are currently engaging intensively in the debate about digitalisation and who are helping to move things in the right direction. For innovation is born most often in companies. We thus need to give employees a greater and not smaller say, for we want to show that it is possible to have a modern welfare state that can succeed in the digital age, too. And that is why it is wonderful that the whole leadership of German unions is with us, led by Reiner Hoffmann. So, innovation is born in companies. But in the digital age we need big initiatives. Our programme embodies this spirit of shaping the future by investing in it. We want to bring IT education to schools, vocational schools and ongoing training. We are thus going to ensure that our state infrastructure is no longer pushed to breaking point by efforts to save money; rather we will make sure that the investments needed are finally ploughed into our schools having proper buildings and modern equipment, enough teachers and sufficient social workers.
Recommended publications
  • Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 239. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Dienstag, 7. September 2021 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 1 Gesetzentwurf der Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und SPD Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Errichtung eines Sondervermögens "Aufbauhilfe 2021" und zur vorübergehenden Aussetzung der Insolvenzantragspflicht wegen Starkregenfällen und Hochwassern im Juli 2021 sowie zur Änderung weiterer Gesetze (Aufbauhilfegesetz 2021 - AufbhG 2021) in der Ausschussfassung hier: Artikel 12 (Änderung des Infektionsschutzgesetzes) Artikel 13 (Einschränkung von Grundrechten) Drs. 19/32039 und 19/32275 Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 625 Nicht abgegebene Stimmen: 84 Ja-Stimmen: 344 Nein-Stimmen: 280 Enthaltungen: 1 Ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 07.09.2021 Beginn: 14:35 Ende: 15:05 Seite: 1 Seite: 2 Seite: 2 CDU/CSU Name Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg. Dr. Michael von Abercron X Stephan Albani X Norbert Maria Altenkamp X Peter Altmaier X Philipp Amthor X Artur Auernhammer X Peter Aumer X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Maik Beermann X Manfred Behrens (Börde) X Veronika Bellmann X Sybille Benning X Dr. André Berghegger X Melanie Bernstein X Christoph Bernstiel X Peter Beyer X Marc Biadacz X Steffen Bilger X Peter Bleser X Norbert Brackmann X Michael Brand (Fulda) X Dr. Reinhard Brandl X Dr. Helge Braun X Silvia Breher X Sebastian Brehm X Heike Brehmer X Ralph Brinkhaus X Dr. Carsten Brodesser X Gitta Connemann X Astrid Damerow X Alexander Dobrindt X Michael Donth X Marie-Luise Dött X Hansjörg Durz X Thomas Erndl X Dr. Dr. h. c. Bernd Fabritius X Hermann Färber X Uwe Feiler X Enak Ferlemann X Axel E.
    [Show full text]
  • Empfang Beim Bundespräsidenten Mitgliederreise Nach Aachen
    Dezember ★ ★ ★ ★ 2 0 13 ★ ★ ★ ★ Vereinigung ehemaliger Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages und des Europäischen Parlaments e. V. Editorial Empfang beim Bundespräsidenten Clemens Schwalbe Informationen Termine Personalien Titelthemen Ingrid Matthäus-Maier Empfang beim Bundespräsidenten Jahreshaupt- versammlung Berlin Mitgliederreise nach Bundespräsident Dr. h. c. Joachim Gauck bei seiner Rede an die Mitglieder der Vereinigung Aachen und Maastricht ©Siegfried Scheffler Mitgliederveranstaltung bei der GIZ in Bonn Mitgliederreise nach Berichte / Erlebtes „Ehemalige“ der Landtage Aachen und Maastricht Europäische Asso ziation Study Group on Germany Deutsch-dänische Beziehungen „Ehemalige“ im Ehrenamt Erlesenes Nachrufe Aktuelles Der Geschäftsführer informiert Die „Ehemaligen“ auf der Freitreppe des Aachener Rathauses vor dem Besuch bei Oberbürgermeister Jubilare Marcel Philipp ©Werner Möller Editorial Informationen it unserer Doppel- Termine ausgabe zum Ende M des Jahres geben wir 6./7. Mai 2014 Jahreshauptversammlung in Berlin diesmal einen Gesamtüber- mit Wahl des Vorstandes blick über die Veranstaltungen, 6. Mai 2014 am Abend: Frühjahrsempfang Ereignisse und Aktivitäten der DPG unserer Vereinigung. Der po- litische Höhepunkt in diesem 26. Juni 2014 am Abend: Sommerfest der DPG Jahr war der Empfang von © Brigitte Prévot 8.-10. Oktober 2014 Mitgliederreise nach Franken 250 Teilnehmern beim Bundes- präsidenten Joachim Gauck im Juni. In der darauf folgenden 47. Kalenderwoche Mitgliederveranstaltung in Bonn Jahreshauptversammlung hatten wir den Vizepräsidenten des Bundestages Dr. Hermann Otto Solms zu Gast, welcher sich in seinem Vortrag mit der Würde und dem Ansehen des Personalien Parlaments auseinandersetzte und dabei auch uns „Ehema- • Anlässlich seines 70. Geburtstages wurde Dr. Wolfgang Weng ligen“ eine wichtige Rolle zusprach. Mittlerweile können wir auf dem Neujahrsempfang der FDP am 06.01.2013 in Gerlin- Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Elite-Mittelstandspreis 2017 an Christian Lindner
    Wir Eigentümer- unternehmer Festschrift zur Preisverleihung Deutscher Elite- Mittelstandspreis 2017 Deutscher Elite- Preisträger Mittelstandspreis 2017 Christian Lindner MdL Festschrift zur Preisverleihung igentümerunternehmer E an Christian Lindner MdL ir Bundesvorsitzender der Freien Demokraten am 27. März 2017 und Vorsitzender der FDP-Landtagsfraktion NRW in Berlin W ® »Wir Eigentümerunternehmer« Stiftung Wir Eigentümerunternehmer Union Mittelständischer Unternehmen e. V. - UMU Europäisches Wirtschaftsforum e. V. - EWiF Bundesverband Deutscher Mittelstand e. V. - BM Festschrift Christian Lindner Wir Eigentümer- unternehmer Deutscher Elite-Mittelstands preis 2017 an Christian Lindner Inhalt Der aktuelle und frühere Preisträger: v. l. Dr. Walter Döring, Wirtschaftsminister a. D., Dr. Hermann Ot- to Solms, Vizepräsident a. D. Deutscher Bundestag, Prof. Dr. Andreas Pinkwart, Wirtschaftsminister ■ Die Preisübergabe in NRW, Christian Lindner MdL, Dr. Ingo Friedrich, Exekutivpräsident UMU und Ehrenmitglied des Europaparlaments 4 Begrüßung — Dr. Yorck Otto 10 Grußwort — Christian Sewing 12 Laudatio — Dr. Karl-Ludwig Kley 16 Laudatio — Prof. Dr. h. c. Roland Berger 24 Replik des Preisträgers — Christian Lindner 32 Die Träger des Deutschen und Europäischen Elite-Mittelstandspreises Mit den Vertretern der Unterstützerverbände: v. l. Harald Elster, Präsident Deutscher Steuerberaterverband, Werner Küsters, Präsident 36 Impressum a. D. Bundesverband der Dienstleistungswirtschaft, Rolf Leuchtenberger, Präsident a. D. Zentralverband Deutsches
    [Show full text]
  • European Roma Rights Centre
    EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE 1386 Budapest 62, P.O. Box 906/93, Hungary Phone: (36-1) 413-2200; Fax: (36-1) 413-2201 E-mail: [email protected] http://errc.org 10 April, 2007 Mr Vladimir Špidla, Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities European Commission Rue de la Loi 200, 1040 Brussels, Belgium Honourable Commissioner Špidla , We, the undersigned organisations, write to you to express our deep concern about the latest adverse remarks made by the Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek on equal opportunities for disadvantaged groups including women, the elderly and ethnic minorities. We believe that Prime Minister Topolanek, in the very least, misrepresented this very important concept by stating, inter alia , that, “equality is at its lowest where the state commits itself the most in the name of the so-called protection of disadvantaged groups”. Furthermore, his approach, which favours assimilation to multiculturalism, is also worrisome. We regret the fact that Prime Minister Topolanek, as a representative of a European Union country, presented publicly such a mendacious representation of one the pillars of the European integration process. We deem it very ironic that his adverse statements on equal opportunities for disadvantaged groups including women, the elderly and ethnic minorities were made at the launch of the European Year of Equal Opportunities for All . Whilst establishing a just, fair and democratic society that respects all its citizens, the role of equal opportunity mechanisms and practices is fundamental. However, his statement that “ No well meant effort to make equal that cannot be equal, no positive discrimination will guarantee the equality of opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Fabio De Masi Le Quotidien
    lundi 21 septembre 2015 INTERVIEW DU LUNDI 3 «S'ils croient que nous allons abandonner, ils se trompent. Nous avons des informations précises que nous allons rendre publiques pour maintenir la pression», prévient Fabio De Masi. LuxLeaks a peu à peu diminué et Alain Lamassoure, le président faits par l'audition. Si vous regar- siers des réfugiés ou des rescrits fis- à-vis de cette gouvernance incapa- c'était exactement l'objectif de dez les recommandations du rap- caux ne fait-elle pas le jeu des eu- ble de taxer les multinationales of- Messieurs Schulz et Juncker. Cela français de la commission spéciale port d'étape de la commission spé- fre peu d'espoir. nous a occupés six mois et nous TAXE, a déclaré qu'il voulait inter- ciale TAXE, elles ne sont pas plus rosceptiques? rendons un rapport sur des choses dire l'accès du Parlement européen contraignantes que celles préconi- Bien entendu. Si on regarde la Pensez-vous que la solution serait réalité en face, les eurosceptiques que nous n'avons même pas vues. aux sociétés qui n'ont pas répondu sées par la Commission. C'est une Europe politique? Mais s'ils croient que nous allons pourquoi il faut un groupe politi- ont raison : l'Europe ne fonc- abandonner, ils se trompent. aux convocations. Trouvez-vous que de gauche au Parlement euro- tionne pas. L'austérité a mis la Je ne suis pas sûr que ce soit juste Nous avons des informations pré- cette sanction suffisante? péen qui réclame davantage. C'est pression sur l'Europe, la dette pu- un problème de structure.
    [Show full text]
  • „An Uns Wird Es Nicht Scheitern“
    Titel „An uns wird es nicht scheitern“ SPIEGEL-Gespräch Linksfraktionschefin Sahra Wagenknecht, 47 , über den Kurswechsel der SPD unter Martin Schulz, die Chancen für Rot-Rot-Grün und ihre mögliche Rolle im Bundeskabinett SPIEGEL: Frau Wagenknecht, SPD-Kanzler - kandidat Martin Schulz ist in dieser Woche von der Agenda 2010 abgerückt. Haben Sie ihm schon gratuliert? Wagenknecht: Er braucht keine Gratulation von mir, allenfalls eine Ermutigung, diesen Weg weiterzugehen. Ich würde mich freu - en, wenn die SPD wieder eine sozialde - mokratische Partei würde. Dann haben wir endlich einen Partner. Vieles von dem, was Herr Schulz nun vorschlägt, fordern wir seit Langem. Auf der anderen Seite macht es mich skeptisch, dass die SPD sol - che Forderungen immer erst im Wahl - kampf entdeckt. Auch Peer Steinbrück hat als Kanzlerkandidat viel von sozialer Ge - rechtigkeit geredet. SPIEGEL: Aber er hat nicht gesagt: Wir ha - ben mit der Agenda 2010 Fehler gemacht. Das ist doch das, was Sie immer wollten: einen Kurswechsel bei der SPD! Wagenknecht: Wenn die SPD ernsthaft eine sozialere Politik verfolgen will, wird es an uns garantiert nicht scheitern. Aber bisher sind Schulz’ Ankündigungen an vielen Stellen vage. Wie viel länger soll das Ar - beitslosengeld I gezahlt werden? Einen Mo - nat? Zwei Jahre? SPIEGEL: Sie trauen Schulz nicht? Wagenknecht: Er gehörte, bevor er Kanzler - kandidat wurde, nie zu den Agenda-Kriti - kern, sondern hat diese Politik jahrelang im SPD-Präsidium mitgetragen. Ich würde ihm gern abnehmen, dass er sich nun korrigieren will. Glaubwürdiger wäre es, wenn er sagen würde, welche Koalition er anstrebt. Sonst könnte es am Ende kommen wie 2013. Die SPD geht trotz anderer Mehrheiten in eine Große Koalition und sagt: Sorry, wir wollten ja, konnten unsere Vorhaben mit der Union aber leider nicht umsetzen.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of an Election Foretold: the Longer-Term Trends Leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ Procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker As European
    LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President Martin Westlake LEQS Paper No. 102/2016 January 2016 LEQS is generously supported by the LSE Annual Fund Editorial Board Dr Joan Costa-i-Font Dr Vassilis Monastiriotis Dr Jonathan White Dr Katjana Gattermann Dr Sonja Avlijas All views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the LSE. © Martin Westlake Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President Martin Westlake* Abstract By focusing on the near-term campaign in the 2014 European elections analysts have tended to over-look a series of longer-term trends that were jointly and inexorably leading to the Spitzenkandidaten (lead candidate) process and to some at least of the subsequent structural reforms to the Commission. The paper argues that those longer-term trends continue and that the (s)election of Jean-Claude Juncker as President of the European Commission and the structural reforms he subsequently introduced are better understood as steps in ongoing processes rather than fresh departures. Thus, what will happen in 2019 will have been conditioned not only by 2014, but also by previous elections and previous developments, as considered in this paper. Keywords: European Commission Presidency, Jean-Claude Juncker, Spitzenkandidaten, European Parliament, Longer-Term Trends * Visiting Professor, College of Europe, Bruges Senior Visiting Fellow, European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE Email: [email protected] The Longer-Term Trends leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ procedure Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the EU's Lead-Candidate Procedure
    ARI 40/2021 5 April 2021 The future of the EU’s lead-candidate procedure Paul Schmidt | Generalsekretär, Österreichische Gesellschaft für Europapolitik | @_PaulSchmidt Johanna Edthofer | Österreichische Gesellschaft für Europapolitik | @JohannaEdthofer Theme This analysis proposes the following policy recommendations. (1) the EU Parliament would be well advised to resuscitate and reform the EU’s lead-candidate procedure, which it vehemently claimed and defended until shortly after the European elections of 2019; (2) the EU Parliament should convince the Council of the EU to jointly enforce an electoral reform agenda well before the next European elections in 2024; and (3) transnational electoral lists could be a key element of this electoral reform, with the European lead-candidates being elected directly, thus further raising public interest in the European elections and increasing the democratic legitimation of the European Commission’s President. Summary The EU’s lead-candidate procedure was first applied at the European elections in 2014. The European parties reached an agreement that only those who had run as lead- candidates in the European elections for their respective political party would be approved as candidates for President of the European Commission. The lead-candidate of the party with the most votes is to be proposed by the European Council as the candidate for President of the European Commission and elected by the European Parliament. However, after the European elections of 2019, neither a fragmented European Parliament nor the EU heads of state and government in the European Council were able to agree on one of the candidates. Nevertheless, the lead-candidate procedure should not be abandoned.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Schulz at the Presentation of the SPD Candidate For
    Speech by Martin Schulz at the presentation of the SPD Candidate for Chancellor on 29 January 2017 Check against delivery! Comrades, ladies and gentlemen, guests, The party’s executive committee has just proposed that I stand as candidate for chancellor and future party chairman. This is an emotional moment for me and I am glad I can share it with you here today. It is a magnificent scene from up here on the rostrum and it’s wonderful to see the Willy Brandt Building so full. Everywhere you go, you can sense the upbeat mood and the new hope placed in the party – not just here in the hall but throughout the country. We’re going to make the elections a thrilling experience again this year. I am very touched and grateful for the tremendous encouragement I have received from party members and the general public over the past few days and so I am looking forward to the forthcoming election campaign. Sigmar, I am personally delighted and we are all very grateful • that you selflessly renounced the office of party chairman and the position as chancellor candidate because you were convinced it was better for the country and for our party to do so; • that we have stuck together through thick and thin over the past few weeks and months, even though efforts were made by others to prise us apart; • and that you are my friend. You’re a great guy and, in proposing that I should now lead the party, you have taken a difficult personal decision with great equanimity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fourth Term in Office for Angela Merkel?
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°441 Germany: a fourth term in office for Angela 5th September 2017 Merkel? Corinne Deloy In Germany elections come and go and also look very much like one another. Unlike the most recent European elections, from the 2016 British referendum, over the country’s exit of the EU, to the French presidential election and the general election in the Netherlands this year, the election in federal Germany on 24th September next appears to be a factor of stability. In one month’s time 61.5 million voters are being called to ballot in the German Republic to renew the Bundestag, the lower Chamber of Parliament. The battle will be between outgoing Chancellor Angela Merkel (Christian-Democratic Union), who is running for a fourth term in office as head of the Germany government and the former President of the European Parliament (2012-2017) Martin Schulz (Social Democratic Party, SPD), who is running for the first time for the post of Chancellor. Angela Merkel is the main favourite in these general hard. But he lacks spark, the spirit. He is finding it elections. When she announced that she would be very difficult to position himself as an alternative running this year her adversary witnessed a sharp candidate to Angela Merkel,” we read in the rise in his popularity ratings and pushed voting weekly “Der Spiegel”. The only doubt that remains intentions for the SPD upwards – so that the party involves the political party (or parties) with whom achieved its highest results in the opinion polls for the outgoing Chancellor will decide to join forces to a very long time, even pulling ahead of the CDU 17 govern Germany over the next four years.
    [Show full text]
  • What Happened to France's European Dream?
    1 FROM FOUNDING FATHERS TO RELUCTANT EUROPEANS; WHAT HAPPENED TO FRANCE’S EUROPEAN DREAM? Lecture delivered by Lara Marlowe, France correspondent for The Irish Times, to the Association of Franco-Irish Studies annual conference, National Concert Hall Dublin, 23 May 2014 The European project is threatened by public apathy and indifference. It is suffocated by the complexity of EU institutions, thwarted by national egotism, and threatened by the rise of populist, europhobic parties. Exit polls last night showed that Geert Wilders’ anti-Europe Freedom Party performed poorly, but we won’t know until Sunday night whether europhobe parties will, as predicted, led the polls in France and Britain. Over the decades I’ve lived in Paris, I’ve watched friends, neighbours and colleagues fall out of love with Europe. In preparing this lecture, I’ve tried to understand why. For weeks, I’ve been asking French people how they feel about Europe. THE DISILLUSIONED At the National Front’s May Day rally, an elderly lady with white hair, a retired accountant, told me how immigrants “invaded” her neighbourhood in Montmartre. “There’s no more work; there’s nothing,” she said. “I want une Europe choisie – a chosen Europe. At the very least, I want people who join Europe to be at our level. Our shops are closing because everything is made by the Chinese. I miss the franc terribly. I want us to be sovereign in our own country, not taking orders from Brussels.” A few nights ago, I had dinner with a French businesswoman who votes for centrist, pro- European parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertemporal Connections Between Query Suggestions and Search Engine Results for Politics Related Queries
    Intertemporal Connections Between Query Suggestions and Search Engine Results for Politics Related Queries Malte Bonart1 and Philipp Schaer1 Technische Hochschule K¨oln,50678 Cologne, Germany [email protected] 1 Introduction This paper deals with the combined analysis of two data sources: First the Al- gorithmWatch data-set on search results for political queries during the German Federal Elections in 2017 [5] and second data from a long-term data crawl of search engine query suggestions. This enables us to examine result lists and query suggestions for the same set of politics related queries over a 2 month period. Query suggestions comprise a set of interactive techniques to assist users with the formulation of their query. As Kelly et al. [4] point out they seem particularly important in cases where users are searching for topics on which they have little knowledge or familiarity and in which they are in a so called \anomalous state of knowledge" [1]. In the context of political opinion formation little is known about the influence of query suggestions in driving the users information behaviour. Regarding search results, the \search engine manipulation effect” was measured in several experimental setups [3]. It claims that biased search rankings can shift the voting preferences of undecided voters. However, the paper is criticized for presenting exaggerated effect sizes [7]. In this paper we (1) present a data set with query suggestions crawled from different web search engines to complement the AlgorithmWatch data. As a first approach we (2) compare the aggregated ranking stability of search results and query suggestions for 16 search queries over a 2 month observation period.
    [Show full text]