WWW-Based Collaboration Environments with Distributed Tool Services

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WWW-Based Collaboration Environments with Distributed Tool Services WWWbased Collab oration Environments with Distributed To ol Services Gail E Kaiser Stephen E Dossick Wenyu Jiang Jack Jingshuang Yang SonnyXiYe Columbia University Department of Computer Science Amsterdam Avenue Mail Co de New York NY UNITED STATES fax kaisercscolumbiaedu CUCS February Abstract Wehave develop ed an architecture and realization of a framework for hyp ermedia collab oration environments that supp ort purp oseful work by orchestrated teams The hyp ermedia represents all plausible multimedia artifacts concerned with the collab orative tasks at hand that can b e placed or generated online from applicationsp ecic materials eg source co de chip layouts blueprints to formal do cumentation to digital library resources to informal email and chat transcripts The environment capabilities include b oth internal hyp ertext and external link server links among these artifacts which can b e added incrementally as useful connections are discovered pro jectsp ecic hyp ermedia search and browsing automated construction of artifacts and hyp erlinks according to the semantics of the group and individual tasks and the overall pro cess workow application of to ols to the artifacts and collab orativework for geographically disp ersed teams We present a general architecture for what wecallhyp ermedia subwebs and imp osition of groupspace services op erating on shared subwebs based on World Wide Web technology which could b e applied over the Internet andor within an organizational intranet We describ e our realization in OzWeb which reuses ob jectoriented data management for applicationsp ecic subweb organization and workow enactmentand co op erative transactions as builtin groupspace services whichwere originally develop ed for the Oz pro cess ware developmentenvironment framework Further we present a general architecture for a centered soft WWWbased distributed to ol launching service This service is implemented by the generic Rivendell comp onent which could b e employed in a standalone manner but has b een integrated into OzWeb as an example foreign ie addon groupspace service Keywords Computersupp orted co op erativework Environment frameworks Hyp ermedia Pro cess To ols Transactions Workow INTRODUCTION In general col laboration environments seek to improve endresult quality and team pro ductivity during b oth prearranged and ad hoc group activities and pro jects ranging from industrial decision supp ort and mili tary command and control to healthcare management and delivery to software engineering and engineering design to publishing and education to crisis management and emergency resp onse Collab oration envi ronments assist information workers b oth individually and together in a group via data organization and search co ordination of concurrent access pro cess workow mo deling and enactment application program launching and other services Collab oration environment frameworks provide generic facilities that can easily and rapidly b e tailored to a sp ecic eort Hypermedia collab oration environments intertwine supp ort for planning and execution of purp oseful work by assisting information workers in generating discovering retrieving up dating crossreferencing and exploiting all online materials that may plausibly b e relevant to an endeavor The conventional applicationsp ecic artifacts eg press releases and intelligence rep orts formally pro duced and consulted during the conduct of a pro ject may make up only a small prop ortion of the relevanthyp ermedia There could also b e arbitrary informal do cuments such as email and newsgroup archives meeting minutes p erhaps including video and audio comp onents even scannedin diagrams sketched on napkins as well as traces of the pro cess that has b een followed to date during the pro ject with various analyses and metrics regarding the progress of the ad hoc eorts may b e slowed down particularly during their initial eort Without such broad supp ort stages due to lack of organized information access Further the do cumentation available after pro ject completion may not include all the nitty details that came up during meetings email discussion groups etc apparent minutiae some of whichmay later b e quite valuable for desiderata and p ostmortem analysis has likely b een lost Hyp ermedia materials need not reside in a single rep ository constructed sp ecically for that pro ject or internal to the encompassing organization but could p otentially reference do cuments from arbitrary external sources and even add on links b etween external data of arbitrary typ es whose native rep ositories or formats provide no hyp erlink capabilities Endusers and the environments task engine should b e able to intro duce links on top of and orthogonal to anyhyp erlinks emb edded in do cuments by the authors to add references to materials the authors never thought of did not know ab out or that did not exist when the do cuments were written Note this p ermits hyp erlinking materials generated and managed independently from the collab orative activity such as digital library publications technical rep orts from unrelated institutions that provided inspiration or insights videos or transcripts of seminars or television presentations with some b earing on the work public resources etc These features are particularly useful for activities whose participating organizations andor information resources must b e drawn together quickly with limited time to set up a pro jectsp ecic database and reformat existing data as hyp ermedia This is very nearly what the World Wide Web WWW provides Thus wecho ose Web technology particu larly Hyp erText Transfer Proto col HTTP and Hyp erText Markup Language HTML as the infrastructure on which to construct hyp ermedia collab oration environments Web technology can b e applied within an organizational intranet with references to external resources tunneled through rewalls ob viouslypro prietary or secret materials would not b e made publicly available on the Internet However Web technology alone or in tandem with other distributed computing infrastructures eg DCE OLE CORBA do es not provide the services necessary for collab oration There is little organization of Web do cuments a great advantage for generic use but consequently pro jectsp ecic navigation and search are challenging Although new Web pages can b e created with We use the terms pro cess and workow interchangeably throughout this pap er ignoring the quibble that workows are generally relatively short and a longlived pro cess may encompass manyworkows links to do cuments elsewhere on the Web there is no general way to add on applicationsp ecic typ es attributes and links to arbitrary materials Applicationsp ecic organization would provide a common context for collab orative information sharing There is no supp ort for workow mo deling and enactment regarding access to Web pages A workow engine can present to users and guide and assist them in following a medical care plan design pro cess business practice etc whose information comp onents are stored as Web hyp ermedia Workowwould provide a structured means for co ordinating the roles that participants take in collab orative tasks Although the Web may soon support versioning and conguration management following the checkout mo del there is little concept of transactions with either the classical atomicity consistency isolation and durability prop erties or p ermitting relaxations prop osed for longduration interactive andor co op erativework The rst author argues in why the checkout mo del is less attractive for collab orative eorts than the emerging variety of co op erative transaction mo dels Concurrency control of some sort is a key requirement for managing concurrent access to shared information Both collab orative and solo work involve more than browsing of HTML do cuments artifacts stored in hyp ermedia collab oration environments come in many dierent formats There is no standard means of using these disparate forms of information once found particularly as inputs to to ols Software to ols and application programs are to information workers as the hammer and chisel are to the carp enter essential comp onents in accomplishing the tasks required by their work Imagine telling a carp enter that some of her favorite to ols could only b e used on a sp ecic style of workb ench and other to ols she uses every daycan only b e used on a dierentstyle of workb ench and a third set of to ols are only available on a particular workb ench lo cated in a neighb oring city Users of collab oration environments face an analogous problem To treat the Web as a rep ository for hyp ermedia collab oration environments it is necessary to apply b oth conventional to ols do cument editors spreadsheets virtual whiteb oards etc and emerging Webaware to ols HTML editors emailers etc to Web entities and place to ol results backonto the Web Many useful to ols run only on particular computing platforms eg Solaris versus Windows and economic constraints may restrict licensing to a particular host b ecause either the hardware or software is very exp ensive eg a Craynumerical analysis package making it dicult to integrate the use of these to ols with a users task at hand preferably p erformed sitting at that users oce workstation or on a mobile host in the eld All these hurdles get in the users way They must rememb er not only where they can run certain to ols but also the sp ecics on starting them including environmentvariables needed command line options etc A distributed
Recommended publications
  • Yutaka Oiwa. "Implementation of a Fail-Safe ANSI C Compiler"
    Implementation of a Fail-Safe ANSI C Compiler 安全な ANSI C コンパイラの実装手法 Doctoral Dissertation 博士論文 Yutaka Oiwa 大岩 寛 Submitted to Department of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo on December 16, 2004 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract Programs written in the C language often suffer from nasty errors due to dangling pointers and buffer overflow. Such errors in Internet server programs are often ex- ploited by malicious attackers to “crack” an entire system, and this has become a problem affecting society as a whole. The root of these errors is usually corruption of on-memory data structures caused by out-of-bound array accesses. The C lan- guage does not provide any protection against such out-of-bound access, although recent languages such as Java, C#, Lisp and ML provide such protection. Never- theless, the C language itself should not be blamed for this shortcoming—it was designed to provide a replacement for assembly languages (i.e., to provide flexible direct memory access through a light-weight high-level language). In other words, lack of array boundary protection is “by design.” In addition, the C language was designed more than thirty years ago when there was not enough computer power to perform a memory boundary check for every memory access. The real prob- lem is the use of the C language for current casual programming, which does not usually require such direct memory accesses. We cannot realistically discard the C language right away, though, because there are many legacy programs written in the C language and many legacy programmers accustomed to the C language and its programming style.
    [Show full text]
  • LISTSERV 16.0 Site Manager's Operations Manual
    Information in this document is subject to change without notice. Companies, names, and data used in examples herein are fictitious unless otherwise noted. L-Soft does not endorse or approve the use of any of the product names or trademarks appearing in this document. Permission is granted to copy this document, at no charge and in its entirety, if the copies are not used for commercial advantage, the source is cited, and the present copyright notice is included in all copies. Recipients of such copies are equally bound to abide by the present conditions. Prior written permission is required for any commercial use of this document, in whole or in part, and for any partial reproduction of the contents of this document exceeding 50 lines of up to 80 characters, or equivalent. The title page, table of contents, and index, if any, are not considered to be part of the document for the purposes of this copyright notice, and can be freely removed if present. Copyright 2009 L-Soft international, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. LISTSERV is a registered trademark licensed to L-Soft international, Inc. ListPlex, CataList, and EASE are service marks of L-Soft international, Inc. LSMTP is a registered trademark of L-Soft international, Inc. The Open Group, Motif, OSF/1 UNIX and the “X” device are registered trademarks of The Open Group in the United State and other countries. Digital, Alpha AXP, AXP, Digital UNIX, OpenVMS, HP, and HP-UX are trademarks of Hewlett- Packard Company in the United States and other countries. Microsoft, Windows, Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows NT are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Abilities, Interfaces and Tasks: Effects on Prospective Information Handling in Email
    Cognitive Abilities, Interfaces and Tasks: Effects on Prospective Information Handling in Email by Jacek Stanisław Gwizdka A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto © Copyright by Jacek Gwizdka 2004 “Cognitive Abilities, Interfaces and Tasks: Effects on Prospective Information Handling in Email” Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 2004 Jacek Stanisław Gwizdka Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto Abstract This dissertation is focused on new email user interfaces that may improve awareness and handling of task-laden messages in the inbox. The practical motivation for this research was to help email users process messages more effectively. A field study was conducted to examine email practices related to handling messages that refer to pending tasks. Individual differences in message handling style were observed, with one group of users transferring such messages out of their email pro- grams to other applications (e.g., calendars), while the other group kept prospective messages in email and used the inbox as a reminder of future events. Two novel graphical user interfaces were designed to facilitate monitoring and retrieval of prospective information from email messages. The TaskView interface displayed task- laden messages on a two-dimensional grid (with time on the horizontal axis). The WebT- askMail interface retained the two-dimensional grid, but extended the representation of pending tasks (added distinction between events and to-do's with deadlines), a vertical date reading line, and more space for email message headers. ii Two user studies were conducted to test hypothesized benefits of the new visual repre- sentations and to examine the effects of different levels of selected cognitive abilities on task-laden message handling performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Unix Quickref.Dvi
    Summary of UNIX commands Table of Contents df [dirname] display free disk space. If dirname is omitted, 1. Directory and file commands 1994,1995,1996 Budi Rahardjo ([email protected]) display all available disks. The output maybe This is a summary of UNIX commands available 2. Print-related commands in blocks or in Kbytes. Use df -k in Solaris. on most UNIX systems. Depending on the config- uration, some of the commands may be unavailable 3. Miscellaneous commands du [dirname] on your site. These commands may be a commer- display disk usage. cial program, freeware or public domain program that 4. Process management must be installed separately, or probably just not in less filename your search path. Check your local documentation or 5. File archive and compression display filename one screenful. A pager similar manual pages for more details (e.g. man program- to (better than) more. 6. Text editors name). This reference card, obviously, cannot de- ls [dirname] scribe all UNIX commands in details, but instead I 7. Mail programs picked commands that are useful and interesting from list the content of directory dirname. Options: a user's point of view. 8. Usnet news -a display hidden files, -l display in long format 9. File transfer and remote access mkdir dirname Disclaimer make directory dirname The author makes no warranty of any kind, expressed 10. X window or implied, including the warranties of merchantabil- more filename 11. Graph, Plot, Image processing tools ity or fitness for a particular purpose, with regard to view file filename one screenfull at a time the use of commands contained in this reference card.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Manager's Operations Manual for LISTSERV®, Version 14.3
    L-Soft international, Inc. Site Manager's Operations Manual for LISTSERV®, version 14.3 7 December 2004 LISTSERV 14.3 Release The reference number of this document is 0412-MD-01. Information in this document is subject to change without notice. Companies, names and data used in examples herein are fictitious unless otherwise noted. L-Soft international, Inc. does not endorse or approve the use of any of the product names or trademarks appearing in this document. Permission is granted to copy this document, at no charge and in its entirety, provided that the copies are not used for commercial advantage, that the source is cited and that the present copyright notice is included in all copies, so that the recipients of such copies are equally bound to abide by the present conditions. Prior written permission is required for any commercial use of this document, in whole or in part, and for any partial reproduction of the contents of this document exceeding 50 lines of up to 80 characters, or equivalent. The title page, table of contents and index, if any, are not considered to be part of the document for the purposes of this copyright notice, and can be freely removed if present. The purpose of this copyright is to protect your right to make free copies of this manual for your friends and colleagues, to prevent publishers from using it for commercial advantage, and to prevent ill-meaning people from altering the meaning of the document by changing or removing a few paragraphs. Copyright © 1996-2004 L-Soft international, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Tailored Application-Specific System Call Tables
    Tailored Application-specific System Call Tables Qiang Zeng, Zhi Xin, Dinghao Wu, Peng Liu, and Bing Mao ABSTRACT policies may be relaxed for setuid programs.1 Once a pro- The system call interface defines the services an operating gram is compromised, a uniform set of kernel services are system kernel provides to user space programs. An oper- potentially exposed to attackers as a versatile and handy ating system usually provides a uniform system call inter- toolkit. While a uniform system call interface simplifies op- face to all user programs, while in practice no programs erating system design, it does not meet the principle of least utilize the whole set of the system calls. Existing system privileges in the perspective of security, as the interface is call based sandboxing and intrusion detection systems fo- not tailored to the needs of applications. cus on confining program behavior using sophisticated finite state or pushdown automaton models. However, these au- Existing researches on system call based sandboxing and tomata generally incur high false positives when modeling intrusion detection focus on system call pattern checking program behavior such as signal handling and multithread- [16, 12, 31, 35, 7], arguments validation [35, 23, 25, 4, 3], ing, and the runtime overhead is usually significantly high. and call stack integrity verification [10, 15]. Some establish We propose to use a stateless model, a whitelist of system sophisticated models such as Finite State Automata (FSA) calls needed by the target program. Due to the simplicity [31, 35, 15, 13] and Pushdown Automata (PDA) [35, 14] we are able to construct the model via static analysis on by training [12, 31, 34, 10] or static analysis [35, 14, 15, the program's binary with much higher precision that in- 13], while others rely on manual configuration to specify the curs few false positives.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipenightdreams Osgcal-Doc Mumudvb Mpg123-Alsa Tbb
    pipenightdreams osgcal-doc mumudvb mpg123-alsa tbb-examples libgammu4-dbg gcc-4.1-doc snort-rules-default davical cutmp3 libevolution5.0-cil aspell-am python-gobject-doc openoffice.org-l10n-mn libc6-xen xserver-xorg trophy-data t38modem pioneers-console libnb-platform10-java libgtkglext1-ruby libboost-wave1.39-dev drgenius bfbtester libchromexvmcpro1 isdnutils-xtools ubuntuone-client openoffice.org2-math openoffice.org-l10n-lt lsb-cxx-ia32 kdeartwork-emoticons-kde4 wmpuzzle trafshow python-plplot lx-gdb link-monitor-applet libscm-dev liblog-agent-logger-perl libccrtp-doc libclass-throwable-perl kde-i18n-csb jack-jconv hamradio-menus coinor-libvol-doc msx-emulator bitbake nabi language-pack-gnome-zh libpaperg popularity-contest xracer-tools xfont-nexus opendrim-lmp-baseserver libvorbisfile-ruby liblinebreak-doc libgfcui-2.0-0c2a-dbg libblacs-mpi-dev dict-freedict-spa-eng blender-ogrexml aspell-da x11-apps openoffice.org-l10n-lv openoffice.org-l10n-nl pnmtopng libodbcinstq1 libhsqldb-java-doc libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil sg3-utils linux-backports-modules-alsa-2.6.31-19-generic yorick-yeti-gsl python-pymssql plasma-widget-cpuload mcpp gpsim-lcd cl-csv libhtml-clean-perl asterisk-dbg apt-dater-dbg libgnome-mag1-dev language-pack-gnome-yo python-crypto svn-autoreleasedeb sugar-terminal-activity mii-diag maria-doc libplexus-component-api-java-doc libhugs-hgl-bundled libchipcard-libgwenhywfar47-plugins libghc6-random-dev freefem3d ezmlm cakephp-scripts aspell-ar ara-byte not+sparc openoffice.org-l10n-nn linux-backports-modules-karmic-generic-pae
    [Show full text]
  • Index Images Download 2006 News Crack Serial Warez Full 12 Contact
    index images download 2006 news crack serial warez full 12 contact about search spacer privacy 11 logo blog new 10 cgi-bin faq rss home img default 2005 products sitemap archives 1 09 links 01 08 06 2 07 login articles support 05 keygen article 04 03 help events archive 02 register en forum software downloads 3 security 13 category 4 content 14 main 15 press media templates services icons resources info profile 16 2004 18 docs contactus files features html 20 21 5 22 page 6 misc 19 partners 24 terms 2007 23 17 i 27 top 26 9 legal 30 banners xml 29 28 7 tools projects 25 0 user feed themes linux forums jobs business 8 video email books banner reviews view graphics research feedback pdf print ads modules 2003 company blank pub games copyright common site comments people aboutus product sports logos buttons english story image uploads 31 subscribe blogs atom gallery newsletter stats careers music pages publications technology calendar stories photos papers community data history arrow submit www s web library wiki header education go internet b in advertise spam a nav mail users Images members topics disclaimer store clear feeds c awards 2002 Default general pics dir signup solutions map News public doc de weblog index2 shop contacts fr homepage travel button pixel list viewtopic documents overview tips adclick contact_us movies wp-content catalog us p staff hardware wireless global screenshots apps online version directory mobile other advertising tech welcome admin t policy faqs link 2001 training releases space member static join health
    [Show full text]
  • Linux-FAQ.Pdf
    The Linux FAQ David C. Merrill david −AT− lupercalia.net 2003−09−19 Revision History Revision 1.20 2001−12−04 Revised by: rk Revision 2.0 2002−04−25 Revised by: dcm Some reorganization and markup changes. Revision 2.1 2003−05−19 Revised by: dcm Fairly complete reorganization and conversion to WikiText. Revision 2.1.1 2003−09−19 Revised by: dcm Minor corrections. Revision 2.1.2 2004−02−28 Revised by: dcm Minor corrections. This is the list of Frequently Asked Questions for Linux, the Free/Open Source UNIX−like operating system kernel that runs on many modern computer systems. The Linux FAQ Table of Contents 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 1.1. About the FAQ..................................................................................................................................1 1.2. Asking Questions and Sending Comments.......................................................................................1 1.3. Authorship and Acknowledgments...................................................................................................1 1.4. Copyright and License......................................................................................................................2 1.5. Disclaimer.........................................................................................................................................2 2. General Information.......................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • State Spill in Modern Operating Systems
    A Characterization of State Spill in Modern Operating Systems Kevin Boos, Emilio Del Vecchio, and Lin Zhong Rice University fkevinaboos, edd5, [email protected] Abstract states change and propagate throughout the system, showing that modularity is necessary but insufficient. For example, Understanding and managing the propagation of states in several process migration works have cited “residual depen- operating systems has become an intractable problem due dencies” that remain on the source system as an obstacle to to their sheer size and complexity. Despite modularization post-migration correctness on the target system [38, 55, 34]. efforts, it remains a significant barrier to many contemporary Fault isolation and fault tolerance literature has long realized computing goals: process migration, fault isolation and the undesirable effects of fate sharing among software mod- tolerance, live update, software virtualization, and more. ules as well as the difficulty of restoring a process or whole Though many previous OS research endeavors have achieved machine statefully after a failure, due to the sprawl of states these goals through ad-hoc, tedious methods, we argue that spread among different system components [28, 26, 52, 51]. they have missed the underlying reason why these goals are Live update and hot-swapping research has long sought to overcome the state maintenance issues and inter-module de- so challenging: state spill. pendencies that plague their implementations when transi- State spill occurs when a software entity’s state undergoes tioning from an old to a new version, forcing developers to lasting changes as a result of a transaction from another entity. write complex state transfer functions [7, 25, 27, 48, 5].
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiating Communication Styles of Leaders on the Linux Kernel
    Differentiating Communication Styles of Leaders on the Linux Kernel Mailing List Daniel Schneider Scott Spurlock Megan Squire Elon University Elon University Elon University Department of Computing Sciences Department of Computing Sciences Department of Computing Sciences [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT "maintainers." These maintainers are in charge of reviewing Much communication between developers of free, libre, and open suggested code fixes, or patches, for the different pieces of the source software (FLOSS) projects happens on email mailing lists. core Linux operating system [1]. To preserve a transparent, Geographically and temporally dispersed development teams use archived history of discussions and decisions relating to the email as an asynchronous, centralized, persistently stored project, the entire team - including all developers and interested institutional memory for sharing code samples, discussing bugs, users - uses email mailing lists to communicate. As of this writing and making decisions. Email is especially important to large, there are 148 different mailing lists associated with the core Linux mature projects, such as the Linux kernel, which has thousands of operating system [2]. The Linux Kernel Mailing List (LKML) is developers and a multi-layered leadership structure. In this paper, one of those 148 lists. With over 7000 subscribers sending nearly we collect and analyze data to understand the communication 300 messages per day, it is a very active community. This mailing patterns in such a community. How do the leaders of the Linux list has been in use for over 20 years, and includes over 2.16 Kernel project write in email? What are the salient features of million emails from approximately 54,000 senders.
    [Show full text]
  • TIED, Libsafeplus: Tools for Runtime Buffer Overflow Protection
    TIED, LibsafePlus: Tools for Runtime Buffer Overflow Protection Kumar Avijit Prateek Gupta Deepak Gupta Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute Of Technology, Kanpur Email: {avijitk,pgupta,deepak}@iitk.ac.in Abstract In a buffer overflow attack, the attacker’s aim is to gain Buffer overflow exploits make use of the treatment of strings access to a system by changing the control flow of a pro- in C as character arrays rather than as first-class objects. gram so that the program executes code that has been care- Manipulation of arrays as pointers and primitive pointer fully crafted by the attacker. The code can be inserted in the arithmetic make it possible for a program to access memory address space of the program using any legitimate form of in- locations which it is not supposed to access. There have been put. The attacker then corrupts a code pointer in the address many efforts in the past to overcome this vulnerability by per- space by overflowing a buffer and makes it point to the in- forming array bounds checking in C. Most of these solutions jected code. When the program later dereferences this code are either inadequate, inefficient or incompatible with legacy pointer, it jumps to the attacker’s code. Such buffer overflows code. In this paper, we present an efficient and transparent occur mainly due to the lack of bounds checking in C library runtime approach for protection against all known forms of functions and carelessness on the programmer’s part. For ex- buffer overflow attacks. Our solution consists of two tools: ample, the use of strcpy() in a program without ensuring TIED (Type Information Extractor and Depositor) and Lib- that the destination buffer is at least as large as the source safePlus.
    [Show full text]