DOCSLIB.ORG

Sobolev and Bounded Variation Functions on Metric Measure Spaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sobolev and Bounded Variation Functions on Metric Measure Spaces Sobolev and Bounded Variation Functions on Metric Measure Spaces Luigi Ambrosio, Roberta Ghezzi Scuola Normale Superiore, Piazza dei Cavalieri 7, 56126 Pisa, Italy [email protected]. Institut de Math´ematiques de Bourgogne, UBFC, 9 Avenue Alain Savary, 21078 Dijon, France [email protected]. Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1. History 1 2. Motivations 3 3. Examples of metric measure spaces 4 Chapter 2. H-Sobolev space and first tools of differential calculus 9 1. Relaxed slope and Cheeger energy 9 2. Elements of differential calculus 11 3. Reminders of convex analysis 14 4. Laplacian and integration by parts formula 15 5. Heat flow in (X; d; m) 16 Chapter 3. The Lagrangian (Beppo Levi) approach 19 1. Basic tools 19 2. The metric case 20 3. p-test plans and their relation with p-Modulus 22 4. The inclusion H1;p(X; d; m) ⊂ BL1;p(X; d; m) 24 5. Equivalence between H-space and BL-space 25 Chapter 4. Sobolev spaces via integration by parts 37 1. Vector fields 37 2. W 1;p-space and the inclusion H1;p(X; d; m) ⊂ W 1;p(X; d; m) 38 3. The inclusion W 1;p(X; d; m) ⊂ BL1;p(X; d; m) 40 Chapter 5. Functions of bounded variation 43 1. The spaces BV∗(X; d; m) and BVBL(X; d; m) 43 2. Structure of the perimeter measure 45 Bibliography 53 CHAPTER 1 Introduction These notes reflect, with minor modification and updates, the lectures given by the first author in occasion of the Trimester in Geometry, Analysis and Dynamics on Sub- Riemannian Manifolds held at Institut Henri Poincar´ein Paris, September 2014. Later on this series of lectures has been in part repeated by the first author within the Research Term in Analysis and Geometry in Metric Spaces at Instituto de Ciencias Matem´aticasin Madrid, May 2015. The style of the presentation is similar to the one of the lectures, in that we aim at the illustration of the key ideas and of the fundamental technical concepts, not looking for the most general statements, whose proofs are occasionally cumbersome. The references on the quite broad topic of Analysis in Metric Spaces do not pretend to be exhaustive, even looking only at the Sobolev theory; nevertheless we think that these lectures provide a good entry point to the literature and to the state of the art on this topic. 1. History n n n Consider the classical Euclidean space (R ; |·|; L ), where L denotes the n-dimensional Lebesgue measure. In this context one can give three definitions of Sobolev spaces, that we now know to be equivalent. 1 n 1 n Let 1 < p < 1 and denote by Cc (R ) the vector space of C functions on R with compact support. Definition 1.1 (W -definition via integration by parts). 1;p n n p n p n n W (R ) := f 2 L (R ) j 9 g 2 L (R ; R ) such that 1 n @' o 8 ' 2 Cc (R ); f dx = − 'gidx; i = 1; : : : ; n : ˆRn @xi ˆRn The vector g in the definition above, called weak gradient, is unique and denoted by rf. The W 1;p norm is then defined by p p1=p kfkW 1;p := kfkp + krfkp : Definition 1.2 (Sobolev definition or H-definition). W 1;p( n) 1;p n 1 n R H (R ) := Cc (R ) ; 1;p n 1 n 1;p n i.e., the Sobolev space H (R ) is the closure of Cc (R ) with respect to the W (R )-norm. Let us recall how the equivalence between Definitions 1.1 and 1.2 can be proved. 1;p n 1;p n Theorem 1.1. H (R ) = W (R ). 1 2 Introduction 1;p n 1;p n Sketch of the proof. The inclusion H (R ) ⊂ W (R ) is rather obvious, once 1;p n 1;p n the notion of convergence in W (R ) is well understood. Indeed, let f 2 H (R ) and let 1 n (fk) ⊂ Cc (R ) be an approximating sequence of f, i.e., lim kfk − fkW 1;p( n) = 0: (1) k!1 R 1 n Fix any ' 2 Cc (R ). Since fk is smooth and ' has compact support, using the integration by parts formula we obtain @' @fk fk dx = − ' dx: (2) ˆRn @xi ˆRn @xi p n Thanks to (1), the sequence (fk) converges to f strongly in L (R ) and there exists g 2 Lp( n; n) such that @fk converges to g strongly in Lp( n). Thus formula (2) goes to R R @xi i R the limit and we get that gi is indeed the weak derivative of f with respect to xi in the sense of distributions. (In other words, integration by parts formula is preserved when approximating by smooth functions). The opposite inclusion is due to Meyers and Serrin [48]: even in general domains Ω, their result is that C1(Ω) \ W 1;p(Ω) is dense in W 1;p(Ω)) and it is based on an approximation 1;p n 1 technique using mollifiers. Pick f 2 W (R ) and a sequence fρg>0 of mollifiers . Then 1 n 1;p n f ∗ ρ 2 C (R ) \ W (R ). Multiplying f ∗ ρ by a cut-off function and using a diagonal argument, one can build up a sequence of smooth functions with compact support converging 1;p n to f strongly in W (R ). Remark 1.1. In connection with sub-Riemannian geometry, a Meyers{Serrin's type result was proved by Franchi, Serapioni and Serra Cassano in [29] for metric measure n spaces associated with systems of vector fields in R satisfying mild hypotheses. For the definition of Sobolev space in this context, see Example 3.4 and references therein. n Definition 1.3 (Beppo Levi definition). Given a point x 2 R and an index i = 1; : : : ; n n−1 we denote byx ^i the point (x1; : : : ; xi−1; xi+1; : : : ; xn) 2 R . Then, we define 1;p n n n n−1 n−1 BL (R ) := f : R ! R j 8 i = 1; : : : ; n and at L -a.e.x ^i 2 R the map t 7! f(x1; : : : ; xi−1; t; xi+1; : : : ; xn) is absolutely continuous and p p @f o jfj + dt dx^i < 1 : ˆRn−1 ˆR @xi In the case n = p = 2, Definition 1.3 appeared much earlier than Definitions 1.1 and 1.2 in the work [45] by Beppo Levi, where the author constructs the space above in order to solve a specific Dirichlet problem in two-dimensional domains. Definition 1.3 is based on absolute continuity along almost every line parallel to every coordinate axes; at that time, the theory of absolutely continuous functions on the line was well understood. The goal of these lectures is to define W , H, and BL-spaces in the more general context of metric measure spaces and to show their equivalence. As we already wrote, this topic is also extensively covered in many research papers and monographs (see for instance [36, 37, 38] and the recent book [40]), covering in details also many more aspects of the theory 1 n Given an even, smooth, nonnegative convolution kernel ρ in R with compact support we denote by −n ρ"(x) = " ρ(x=") the sequence of rescaled kernels. 2 Motivations 3 (potential estimates, regularity of solutions, trace theorems, etc.). We want to convey a new point of view in this subject and show that the equivalence between these points of view and of the corresponding notions of gradient is a general phenomenon, true under almost no assumption on the metric measure structure. In addition, some concepts presented in these notes (even though with a few details, since we mostly focus on the Sobolev theory) are new even from the point of view of the classical theory, as the notion of \measure upper gradient" developed in connection with the theory of functions of bounded variation. Let us remark that, already in the Euclidean case, the three definitions are conceptually quite different. Indeed the three constructions rely on different objects: Definition 1.1 is based on coordinate vector fields, Definition 1.2 exploits approximations by smooth func- tions, whereas Definition 1.3 takes account of the behavior of a function along special curves. Moreover, the BL-space is characterized by a pointwise definition: there is no evidence there of Lebesgue equivalence classes of functions, as in the definition of the W -space. This is essentially due to the fact that at the time of Beppo Levi's work, the mathematical tools needed to deal with this kind of space were not completely developed yet. As a drawback, it was not clear whether the BL-space depended upon the choice of coordinate systems. It was much later that this criticism was overcome in Fuglede's paper [31], with a frame invariant definition that we will illustrate. 2. Motivations Most of the material in these lecture notes has been developed in a series of papers by Ambrosio, Gigli and Savar´e[11, 12, 14, 13, 15], as well as Ambrosio, Colombo, Di Marino [5]. In this series of papers, one of the main motivations for revisiting the theory of Sobolev spaces in metric measure spaces is that this theory provides basic mathematical tools for the theory of synthetic Ricci lower bounds in metric measure space. Let us describe roughly the two fundamental approaches in this context. One side of the theory was developed by Bakry and Emery´ who introduced Γ-calculus and used the language of Dirichlet forms to give a meaning to the inequality 1 1 ∆ jrfj2 − hrf; ∆rfi ≥ (∆f)2 + Kjrfj2; 2 N which is known as CD(K; N).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sobolev Spaces, Theory and Applications
    Sobolev spaces, theory and applications Piotr Haj lasz1 Introduction These are the notes that I prepared for the participants of the Summer School in Mathematics in Jyv¨askyl¨a,August, 1998. I thank Pekka Koskela for his kind invitation. This is the second summer course that I delivere in Finland. Last August I delivered a similar course entitled Sobolev spaces and calculus of variations in Helsinki. The subject was similar, so it was not posible to avoid overlapping. However, the overlapping is little. I estimate it as 25%. While preparing the notes I used partially the notes that I prepared for the previous course. Moreover Lectures 9 and 10 are based on the text of my joint work with Pekka Koskela [33]. The notes probably will not cover all the material presented during the course and at the some time not all the material written here will be presented during the School. This is however, not so bad: if some of the results presented on lectures will go beyond the notes, then there will be some reasons to listen the course and at the same time if some of the results will be explained in more details in notes, then it might be worth to look at them. The notes were prepared in hurry and so there are many bugs and they are not complete. Some of the sections and theorems are unfinished. At the end of the notes I enclosed some references together with comments. This section was also prepared in hurry and so probably many of the authors who contributed to the subject were not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Partial Differential Equations John K. Hunter
    Notes on Partial Differential Equations John K. Hunter Department of Mathematics, University of California at Davis Contents Chapter 1. Preliminaries 1 1.1. Euclidean space 1 1.2. Spaces of continuous functions 1 1.3. H¨olderspaces 2 1.4. Lp spaces 3 1.5. Compactness 6 1.6. Averages 7 1.7. Convolutions 7 1.8. Derivatives and multi-index notation 8 1.9. Mollifiers 10 1.10. Boundaries of open sets 12 1.11. Change of variables 16 1.12. Divergence theorem 16 Chapter 2. Laplace's equation 19 2.1. Mean value theorem 20 2.2. Derivative estimates and analyticity 23 2.3. Maximum principle 26 2.4. Harnack's inequality 31 2.5. Green's identities 32 2.6. Fundamental solution 33 2.7. The Newtonian potential 34 2.8. Singular integral operators 43 Chapter 3. Sobolev spaces 47 3.1. Weak derivatives 47 3.2. Examples 47 3.3. Distributions 50 3.4. Properties of weak derivatives 53 3.5. Sobolev spaces 56 3.6. Approximation of Sobolev functions 57 3.7. Sobolev embedding: p < n 57 3.8. Sobolev embedding: p > n 66 3.9. Boundary values of Sobolev functions 69 3.10. Compactness results 71 3.11. Sobolev functions on Ω ⊂ Rn 73 3.A. Lipschitz functions 75 3.B. Absolutely continuous functions 76 3.C. Functions of bounded variation 78 3.D. Borel measures on R 80 v vi CONTENTS 3.E. Radon measures on R 82 3.F. Lebesgue-Stieltjes measures 83 3.G. Integration 84 3.H. Summary 86 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes for MATH 592A
    Lecture Notes for MATH 592A Vladislav Panferov February 25, 2008 1. Introduction As a motivation for developing the theory let’s consider the following boundary-value problem, u′′ + u = f(x) x Ω=(0, 1) − ∈ u(0) = 0, u(1) = 0, where f is a given (smooth) function. We know that the solution is unique, sat- isfies the stability estimate following from the maximum principle, and it can be expressed explicitly through Green’s function. However, there is another way “to say something about the solution”, quite independent of what we’ve done before. Let’s multuply the differential equation by u and integrate by parts. We get x=1 1 1 u′ u + (u′ 2 + u2) dx = f u dx. − x=0 0 0 h i Z Z The boundary terms vanish because of the boundary conditions. We introduce the following notations 1 1 u 2 = u2 dx (thenorm), and (f,u)= f udx (the inner product). k k Z0 Z0 Then the integral identity above can be written in the short form as u′ 2 + u 2 =(f,u). k k k k Now we notice the following inequality (f,u) 6 f u . (Cauchy-Schwarz) | | k kk k This may be familiar from linear algebra. For a quick proof notice that f + λu 2 = f 2 +2λ(f,u)+ λ2 u 2 0 k k k k k k ≥ 1 for any λ. This expression is a quadratic function in λ which has a minimum for λ = (f,u)/ u 2. Using this value of λ and rearranging the terms we get − k k (f,u)2 6 f 2 u 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Sobolev Spaces
    Introduction to Sobolev Spaces Lecture Notes MM692 2018-2 Joa Weber UNICAMP December 23, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction1 1.1 Notation and conventions......................2 2 Lp-spaces5 2.1 Borel and Lebesgue measure space on Rn .............5 2.2 Definition...............................8 2.3 Basic properties............................ 11 3 Convolution 13 3.1 Convolution of functions....................... 13 3.2 Convolution of equivalence classes................. 15 3.3 Local Mollification.......................... 16 3.3.1 Locally integrable functions................. 16 3.3.2 Continuous functions..................... 17 3.4 Applications.............................. 18 4 Sobolev spaces 19 4.1 Weak derivatives of locally integrable functions.......... 19 1 4.1.1 The mother of all Sobolev spaces Lloc ........... 19 4.1.2 Examples........................... 20 4.1.3 ACL characterization.................... 21 4.1.4 Weak and partial derivatives................ 22 4.1.5 Approximation characterization............... 23 4.1.6 Bounded weakly differentiable means Lipschitz...... 24 4.1.7 Leibniz or product rule................... 24 4.1.8 Chain rule and change of coordinates............ 25 4.1.9 Equivalence classes of locally integrable functions..... 27 4.2 Definition and basic properties................... 27 4.2.1 The Sobolev spaces W k;p .................. 27 4.2.2 Difference quotient characterization of W 1;p ........ 29 k;p 4.2.3 The compact support Sobolev spaces W0 ........ 30 k;p 4.2.4 The local Sobolev spaces Wloc ............... 30 4.2.5 How the spaces relate.................... 31 4.2.6 Basic properties { products and coordinate change.... 31 i ii CONTENTS 5 Approximation and extension 33 5.1 Approximation............................ 33 5.1.1 Local approximation { any domain............. 33 5.1.2 Global approximation on bounded domains.......
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Partial Differential Equations Prof. Dr. Thomas
    Advanced Partial Differential Equations Prof. Dr. Thomas Sørensen summer term 2015 Marcel Schaub July 2, 2015 1 Contents 0 Recall PDE 1 & Motivation 3 0.1 Recall PDE 1 . .3 1 Weak derivatives and Sobolev spaces 7 1.1 Sobolev spaces . .8 1.2 Approximation by smooth functions . 11 1.3 Extension of Sobolev functions . 13 1.4 Traces . 15 1.5 Sobolev inequalities . 17 2 Linear 2nd order elliptic PDE 25 2.1 Linear 2nd order elliptic partial differential operators . 25 2.2 Weak solutions . 26 2.3 Existence via Lax-Milgram . 28 2.4 Inhomogeneous bounday value problems . 35 2.5 The space H−1(U) ................................ 36 2.6 Regularity of weak solutions . 39 A Tutorials 58 A.1 Tutorial 1: Review of Integration . 58 A.2 Tutorial 2 . 59 A.3 Tutorial 3: Norms . 61 A.4 Tutorial 4 . 62 A.5 Tutorial 6 (Sheet 7) . 65 A.6 Tutorial 7 . 65 A.7 Tutorial 9 . 67 A.8 Tutorium 11 . 67 B Solutions of the problem sheets 70 B.1 Solution to Sheet 1 . 70 B.2 Solution to Sheet 2 . 71 B.3 Solution to Problem Sheet 3 . 73 B.4 Solution to Problem Sheet 4 . 76 B.5 Solution to Exercise Sheet 5 . 77 B.6 Solution to Exercise Sheet 7 . 81 B.7 Solution to problem sheet 8 . 84 B.8 Solution to Exercise Sheet 9 . 87 2 0 Recall PDE 1 & Motivation 0.1 Recall PDE 1 We mainly studied linear 2nd order equations – specifically, elliptic, parabolic and hyper- bolic equations. Concretely: • The Laplace equation ∆u = 0 (elliptic) • The Poisson equation −∆u = f (elliptic) • The Heat equation ut − ∆u = 0, ut − ∆u = f (parabolic) • The Wave equation utt − ∆u = 0, utt − ∆u = f (hyperbolic) We studied (“main motivation; goal”) well-posedness (à la Hadamard) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Functional Analysis and Sobolev Spaces to Solve Poisson’S Equation
    USING FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND SOBOLEV SPACES TO SOLVE POISSON'S EQUATION YI WANG Abstract. We study Banach and Hilbert spaces with an eye to- wards defining weak solutions to elliptic PDE. Using Lax-Milgram we prove that weak solutions to Poisson's equation exist under certain conditions. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Banach spaces 2 3. Weak topology, weak star topology and reflexivity 6 4. Lower semicontinuity 11 5. Hilbert spaces 13 6. Sobolev spaces 19 References 21 1. Introduction We will discuss the following problem in this paper: let Ω be an open and connected subset in R and f be an L2 function on Ω, is there a solution to Poisson's equation (1) −∆u = f? From elementary partial differential equations class, we know if Ω = R, we can solve Poisson's equation using the fundamental solution to Laplace's equation. However, if we just take Ω to be an open and connected set, the above method is no longer useful. In addition, for arbitrary Ω and f, a C2 solution does not always exist. Therefore, instead of finding a strong solution, i.e., a C2 function which satisfies (1), we integrate (1) against a test function φ (a test function is a Date: September 28, 2016. 1 2 YI WANG smooth function compactly supported in Ω), integrate by parts, and arrive at the equation Z Z 1 (2) rurφ = fφ, 8φ 2 Cc (Ω): Ω Ω So intuitively we want to find a function which satisfies (2) for all test functions and this is the place where Hilbert spaces come into play.
    [Show full text]
  • Function Spaces Mikko Salo
    Function spaces Lecture notes, Fall 2008 Mikko Salo Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Helsinki Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Chapter 2. Interpolation theory 5 2.1. Classical results 5 2.2. Abstract interpolation 13 2.3. Real interpolation 16 2.4. Interpolation of Lp spaces 20 Chapter 3. Fractional Sobolev spaces, Besov and Triebel spaces 27 3.1. Fourier analysis 28 3.2. Fractional Sobolev spaces 33 3.3. Littlewood-Paley theory 39 3.4. Besov and Triebel spaces 44 3.5. H¨olderand Zygmund spaces 54 3.6. Embedding theorems 60 Bibliography 63 v CHAPTER 1 Introduction In mathematical analysis one deals with functions which are dif- ferentiable (such as continuously differentiable) or integrable (such as square integrable or Lp). It is often natural to combine the smoothness and integrability requirements, which leads one to introduce various spaces of functions. This course will give a brief introduction to certain function spaces which are commonly encountered in analysis. This will include H¨older, Lipschitz, Zygmund, Sobolev, Besov, and Triebel-Lizorkin type spaces. We will try to highlight typical uses of these spaces, and will also give an account of interpolation theory which is an important tool in their study. The first part of the course covered integer order Sobolev spaces in domains in Rn, following Evans [4, Chapter 5]. These lecture notes contain the second part of the course. Here the emphasis is on Sobolev type spaces where the smoothness index may be any real number. This second part of the course is more or less self-contained, in that we will use the first part mainly as motivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Functions and Distributions
    When functions have no value(s): Delta functions and distributions Steven G. Johnson, MIT course 18.303 notes Created October 2010, updated March 8, 2017. Abstract x = 0. That is, one would like the function δ(x) = 0 for all x 6= 0, but with R δ(x)dx = 1 for any in- These notes give a brief introduction to the mo- tegration region that includes x = 0; this concept tivations, concepts, and properties of distributions, is called a “Dirac delta function” or simply a “delta which generalize the notion of functions f(x) to al- function.” δ(x) is usually the simplest right-hand- low derivatives of discontinuities, “delta” functions, side for which to solve differential equations, yielding and other nice things. This generalization is in- a Green’s function. It is also the simplest way to creasingly important the more you work with linear consider physical effects that are concentrated within PDEs, as we do in 18.303. For example, Green’s func- very small volumes or times, for which you don’t ac- tions are extremely cumbersome if one does not al- tually want to worry about the microscopic details low delta functions. Moreover, solving PDEs with in this volume—for example, think of the concepts of functions that are not classically differentiable is of a “point charge,” a “point mass,” a force plucking a great practical importance (e.g. a plucked string with string at “one point,” a “kick” that “suddenly” imparts a triangle shape is not twice differentiable, making some momentum to an object, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Functional Analysis
    Fact Sheet Functional Analysis Literature: Hackbusch, W.: Theorie und Numerik elliptischer Differentialgleichungen. Teubner, 1986. Knabner, P., Angermann, L.: Numerik partieller Differentialgleichungen. Springer, 2000. Triebel, H.: H¨ohere Analysis. Harri Deutsch, 1980. Dobrowolski, M.: Angewandte Funktionalanalysis, Springer, 2010. 1. Banach- and Hilbert spaces Let V be a real vector space. Normed space: A norm is a mapping k · k : V ! [0; 1), such that: kuk = 0 , u = 0; (definiteness) kαuk = jαj · kuk; α 2 R; u 2 V; (positive scalability) ku + vk ≤ kuk + kvk; u; v 2 V: (triangle inequality) The pairing (V; k · k) is called a normed space. Seminorm: In contrast to a norm there may be elements u 6= 0 such that kuk = 0. It still holds kuk = 0 if u = 0. Comparison of two norms: Two norms k · k1, k · k2 are called equivalent if there is a constant C such that: −1 C kuk1 ≤ kuk2 ≤ Ckuk1; u 2 V: If only one of these inequalities can be fulfilled, e.g. kuk2 ≤ Ckuk1; u 2 V; the norm k · k1 is called stronger than the norm k · k2. k · k2 is called weaker than k · k1. Topology: In every normed space a canonical topology can be defined. A subset U ⊂ V is called open if for every u 2 U there exists a " > 0 such that B"(u) = fv 2 V : ku − vk < "g ⊂ U: Convergence: A sequence vn converges to v w.r.t. the norm k · k if lim kvn − vk = 0: n!1 1 A sequence vn ⊂ V is called Cauchy sequence, if supfkvn − vmk : n; m ≥ kg ! 0 for k ! 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Sobolev Embeddings and Function Spaces
    Optimal Sobolev embeddings and Function Spaces Nadia Clavero Director: Javier Soria Tutor: Joan Cerd`a M´asteren Matem´aticaAvanzada y Profesional Especialidad Acad´emicaAvanzada Curso 2010/2011 U UNIVERSITAT DE BARCELONA B Contents 1 Introduction5 2 Preliminaries 11 2.1 The distribution function............................. 11 2.2 Decreasing rearrangements............................ 12 2.3 Rearrangement invariant Banach function spaces................ 16 2.4 Orlicz spaces................................... 18 2.5 Lorentz spaces................................... 22 2.6 Lorentz Zygmund spaces............................. 25 2.7 Interpolation spaces................................ 26 2.8 Weighted Hardy operators............................ 28 3 Sobolev spaces 35 3.1 Introduction.................................... 35 3.2 Definitions and basic properties......................... 35 3.3 Riesz potencials.................................. 38 3.4 Sobolev embedding theorem........................... 40 4 Orlicz spaces and Lorentz spaces 49 4.1 Introduction.................................... 49 4.2 Sobolev embeddings into Orlicz spaces..................... 50 4.3 Sobolev embeddings into Lorentz spaces.................... 52 4.4 Sobolev embeddings into Lorentz Zygmund spaces............... 56 5 Optimal Sobolev embeddings on rearrangement invariant spaces 59 5.1 Introduction.................................... 59 5.2 Reduction Theorem................................ 59 5.3 Optimal range and optimal domain of r.i. norms................ 70 5.4 Examples....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sobolev-Type Spaces (Mainly Based on the Lp Norm) on Metric Spaces, and Newto- Nian Spaces in Particular, Have Been Under Intensive Study Since the Mid-"##$S
    - ) . / 0 &/ . ! " # $" ! %&' '( ! ) *+, !"## $ "% ' ( &)*+) ,##(-./*01*2/ ,#3(+140+)01*)+0.*/0- %"52-)/ 6 7 %80$%6!"6#62-)/ i Abstract !is thesis consists of four papers and focuses on function spaces related to !rst- order analysis in abstract metric measure spaces. !e classical (i.e., Sobolev) theory in Euclidean spaces makes use of summability of distributional gradients, whose de!nition depends on the linear structure of Rn. In metric spaces, we can replace the distributional gradients by (weak) upper gradients that control the functions’ behav- ior along (almost) all recti!able curves, which gives rise to the so-called Newtonian spaces. !e summability condition, considered in the thesis, is expressed using a general Banach function lattice quasi-norm and so an extensive framework is built. Sobolev-type spaces (mainly based on the Lp norm) on metric spaces, and Newto- nian spaces in particular, have been under intensive study since the mid-"##$s. In Paper I, the elementary theory of Newtonian spaces based on quasi-Banach function lattices is built up. Standard tools such as moduli of curve families and the Sobolev capacity are developed and applied to study the basic properties of Newto- nian functions. Summability of a (weak) upper gradient of a function is shown to guarantee the function’s absolute continuity on almost all curves. Moreover, New- tonian spaces are proven complete in this general setting. Paper II investigates the set of all weak upper gradients of a Newtonian function. In particular, existence of minimal weak upper gradients is established. Validity of Lebesgue’s di%erentiation theorem for the underlying metric measure space ensures that a family of representation formulae for minimal weak upper gradients can be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I, Chapter 2 Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces 2.1 Differentiation
    Part I, Chapter 2 Weak derivatives and Sobolev spaces We investigate in this chapter the notion of differentiation for Lebesgue inte- grable functions. We introduce an extension of the classical concept of deriva- tive and partial derivative which is called weak derivative. This notion will be used throughout the book. It is particularly useful when one tries to differen- tiate finite element functions that are continuous and piecewise polynomial. In that case one does not need to bother about the points where the classical derivative is multivalued to define the weak derivative. We also introduce the concept of Sobolev spaces. These spaces are useful to study the well-posedness of partial differential equations and their approximation using finite elements. 2.1 Differentiation We study here the concept of differentiation for Lebesgue integrable functions. 2.1.1 Lebesgue Points Theorem 2.1 (Lebesgue points). Let f L1(D). Let B(x,h) be the ball of radius h> 0 centered at x D. The following∈ holds true for a.e. x D: ∈ ∈ 1 lim f(y) f(x) dy =0. (2.1) h 0 B(x,h) | − | ↓ | | ZB(x,h) Points x D where (2.1) holds true are called Lebesgue points of f. ∈ Proof. See, e.g., Rudin [162, Thm. 7.6]. This result says that for a.e. x D, the averages of f( ) f(x) are small over small balls centered at x∈, i.e., f does not oscillate| · too− much| in the neighborhood of x. Notice that if the function f is continuous at x, then x is a Lebesgue point of f (recall that a continuous function is uniformly continuous over compact sets).
    [Show full text]