Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2012/000978/18918 Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2012/000978 Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal Appellant : Mr. Prafulla Kumar Daas R/O- Sagardweep P.O. Aerila Bay Diglipur, North Andaman Respondent Mr. Kalipadu Sarkar Public Information Officer & Tehsildar (Mayabunder) UT of Andaman & Nicobar Administration Revenue Department O/o the Assistant Commissioner Mayabunder- 744204 RTI application filled on : 21/09/2011 PIO replied : 14/10/2011 First appeal filed on : not enclosed First Appellate Authority order : not enclosed Second Appeal received on : 28/03/2012 The Appellant had sought information regarding the application addressed to the Assistant commissioner on date 20/03/1996 and the action taken details of the same application. Sl. Information Sought 1. Copy of the application addressed to the Assistant Commissioner (the sub-registrar of weels) Mayabunder in undersigned of Prasanna kumar Das S/o Late Ram Govinda Das, Khudirampur, Diglipur dispached in 20/03/1996 in addressed office.. 2. Action taken to this application mentioned point no. 1 as above 3. Details file with all Proceeding taken fill 21/09/2011 since 20/03/1996 to above said point not indicated submission. Reply of the Public Information Officer (PIO) No such record is traceable in this office. Grounds for the First Appeal: No reply from PIO within the stipulated time period. Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA): Not enclosed Page 1 of 2 Grounds for the Second Appeal: Unsatisfactory reply provided by the PIO and no reply from FAA. Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing: The following were present Appellant: Mr. Prafulla Kumar Daas on video conference from NIC-Port Blair Studio; Respondent: Mr. Kalipadu Sarkar, Public Information Officer & Tehsildar (Mayabunder) on video conference from NIC-Port Blair Studio; The Appellant has sought information about an application that he has filed in 1996. The PIO states that this is not on the records and hence he is not able to furnish the information regarding this. Decision: The Appeal is disposed. The information sought by the Appellant is not available and hence cannot be provided. This decision is announced in open chamber. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties. Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act. Shailesh Gandhi Information Commissioner 15 May 2012 (In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (ss) Page 2 of 2.