DOCSLIB.ORG

De Hooiwagens 1St Revision14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
De Hooiwagens 1St Revision14 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 CHARACTERISTICS OF HARVESTMEN ............................................................................................................................ 2 GROUPS SIMILAR TO HARVESTMEN ............................................................................................................................. 3 PREVIOUS PUBLICATIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 3 BIOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 LIFE CYCLE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 MATING AND EGG-LAYING ........................................................................................................................................... 4 FOOD ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 DEFENCE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 PHORESY, PARASITES AND PREDATORS ....................................................................................................................... 5 DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 HABITATS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 STUDY .............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 FIELD OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................................................................................... 7 HANDLING ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 COLLECTING .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 STORAGE AND DISSECTION ........................................................................................................................................... 8 PHOTOGRAPHING ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 BODY PLAN .................................................................................................................................................................... 8 CEPHALOTHORAX .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 ABDOMEN ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 JUVENILE OR ADULT? .................................................................................................................................................. 10 MALE OR FEMALE? ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 11 HOW TO USE THE KEY .............................................................................................................................................. 13 LENGTHS...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 COLOUR ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13 GEOGRAPHICAL AREA COVERED ................................................................................................................................. 13 IDENTIFICATION KEY............................................................................................................................................... 14 SPECIES ACCOUNTS .................................................................................................................................................. 18 Nemastoma bimaculatum ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Nemastoma lugubre ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Nemastoma dentigerum ......................................................................................................................................... 20 Paranemastoma quadripunctatum ......................................................................................................................... 21 Mitostoma chrysomelas .......................................................................................................................................... 22 Trogulus tricarinatus ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Trogulus nepaeformis s.l. ........................................................................................................................................ 24 Anelasmocephalus cambridgei ............................................................................................................................... 25 Ischyropsalis hellwigi ............................................................................................................................................... 26 Phalangium opilio ................................................................................................................................................... 27 Opilio parietinus ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 Opilio saxatilis ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 Opilio canestrinii ..................................................................................................................................................... 30 Platybunus pinetorum ............................................................................................................................................. 31 Megabunus diadema .............................................................................................................................................. 32 Rilaena triangularis ................................................................................................................................................. 33 Lophopilio palpinalis ............................................................................................................................................... 34 Oligolophus tridens ................................................................................................................................................. 35 Oligolophus hanseni ................................................................................................................................................ 36 Paroligolophus agrestis ........................................................................................................................................... 37 Lacinius horridus ..................................................................................................................................................... 38 Lacinius ephippiatus ................................................................................................................................................ 39 Odiellus spinosus ..................................................................................................................................................... 40 Mitopus morio ......................................................................................................................................................... 41 Dicranopalpus ramosus ........................................................................................................................................... 42 Homalenotus quadridentatus ................................................................................................................................. 43 Astrobunus laevipes ...............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Functional Morphology of Attachment Devices in Arachnida
    Comparative functional morphology of attachment devices in Arachnida Vergleichende Funktionsmorphologie der Haftstrukturen bei Spinnentieren (Arthropoda: Arachnida) DISSERTATION zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel vorgelegt von Jonas Otto Wolff geboren am 20. September 1986 in Bergen auf Rügen Kiel, den 2. Juni 2015 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Stanislav N. Gorb _ Zweiter Gutachter: Dr. Dirk Brandis _ Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 17. Juli 2015 _ Zum Druck genehmigt: 17. Juli 2015 _ gez. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang J. Duschl, Dekan Acknowledgements I owe Prof. Stanislav Gorb a great debt of gratitude. He taught me all skills to get a researcher and gave me all freedom to follow my ideas. I am very thankful for the opportunity to work in an active, fruitful and friendly research environment, with an interdisciplinary team and excellent laboratory equipment. I like to express my gratitude to Esther Appel, Joachim Oesert and Dr. Jan Michels for their kind and enthusiastic support on microscopy techniques. I thank Dr. Thomas Kleinteich and Dr. Jana Willkommen for their guidance on the µCt. For the fruitful discussions and numerous information on physical questions I like to thank Dr. Lars Heepe. I thank Dr. Clemens Schaber for his collaboration and great ideas on how to measure the adhesive forces of the tiny glue droplets of harvestmen. I thank Angela Veenendaal and Bettina Sattler for their kind help on administration issues. Especially I thank my students Ingo Grawe, Fabienne Frost, Marina Wirth and André Karstedt for their commitment and input of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Midgut Diverticula Epithelial Cells of the European
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Changes in the midgut diverticula epithelial cells of the European cave spider, Meta menardi, under Received: 13 March 2018 Accepted: 24 August 2018 controlled winter starvation Published: xx xx xxxx Saška Lipovšek1,2,3,4, Tone Novak2, Franc Janžekovič2, Nina Brdelak5 & Gerd Leitinger 4 The European cave spider, Meta menardi, is among the most common troglophile species inhabiting the cave entrance zone in Europe, where prey is scarce in winter. Spiders feed only if prey is available; otherwise, they are subjected to long-term winter starvation. We carried out a four-month winter starvation of M. menardi under controlled conditions to analyze ultrastructural changes in the midgut diverticula epithelial cells at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of the starvation period. We used light microscopy, TEM and quantifed reserve lipids and glycogen. The midgut diverticula epithelium consisted of secretory cells, digestive cells and adipocytes. During starvation, gradual vacuolization of some digestive cells, and some necrotic digestive cells and adipocytes appeared. Autophagic structures, autophagosomes, autolysosomes and residual bodies were found in all three cell types. Spherites and the energy-reserve compounds were gradually exploited, until in some spherites only the membrane remained. Comparison between spring, autumn and winter starvation reveals that, during the growth period, M. menardi accumulate reserve compounds in spherites and protein granules, and energy-supplying lipids and glycogen, like many epigean, overwintering arthropods. In M. menardi, otherwise active all over the year, this is an adaptive response to the potential absence of prey in winter. Te European cave spider, Meta menardi (Latreille, 1804) (Araneae, Tetragnathidae) inhabit the twilight zone of most hypogean habitats across Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coume Ouarnède System, a Hotspot of Subterranean Biodiversity in Pyrenees (France)
    diversity Article The Coume Ouarnède System, a Hotspot of Subterranean Biodiversity in Pyrenees (France) Arnaud Faille 1,* and Louis Deharveng 2 1 Department of Entomology, State Museum of Natural History, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany 2 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR7205, CNRS, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 75005 Paris, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Located in Northern Pyrenees, in the Arbas massif, France, the system of the Coume Ouarnède, also known as Réseau Félix Trombe—Henne Morte, is the longest and the most complex cave system of France. The system, developed in massive Mesozoic limestone, has two distinct resur- gences. Despite relatively limited sampling, its subterranean fauna is rich, composed of a number of local endemics, terrestrial as well as aquatic, including two remarkable relictual species, Arbasus cae- cus (Simon, 1911) and Tritomurus falcifer Cassagnau, 1958. With 38 stygobiotic and troglobiotic species recorded so far, the Coume Ouarnède system is the second richest subterranean hotspot in France and the first one in Pyrenees. This species richness is, however, expected to increase because several taxonomic groups, like Ostracoda, as well as important subterranean habitats, like MSS (“Milieu Souterrain Superficiel”), have not been considered so far in inventories. Similar levels of subterranean biodiversity are expected to occur in less-sampled karsts of central and western Pyrenees. Keywords: troglobionts; stygobionts; cave fauna Citation: Faille, A.; Deharveng, L. The Coume Ouarnède System, a Hotspot of Subterranean Biodiversity in Pyrenees (France). Diversity 2021, 1. Introduction 13 , 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ Stretching at the border between France and Spain, the Pyrenees are known as one d13090419 of the subterranean hotspots of the world [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Harvest-Spiders 515
    PROVISIONAL ATLAS OF THE REF HARVEST-SPIDERS 515. 41.3 (ARACHNIDA:OPILIONES) OF THE BRITISH ISLES J H P SANKEY art å • r yz( I is -..a .e_I • UI II I AL _ A L _ • cta • • .. az . • 4fe a stir- • BIOLOGICAL RECORDS CENTRE Natural Environment Research Council Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Ltd at the Dorset Press, Dorchester, Dorset ONERC Copyright 1988 Published in 1988 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecålogy Merlewood Research Station GRANGE-OVER-SANDS Cumbria LA1/ 6JU ISBN 1 870393 10 4 The institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) was established in 1973, from the former Nature Conservancy's research stations and staff, joined later by the Institute of Tree Biology and the Culture Centre of Algae and Protozoa. ITO contribbtes to, and draws upon, the collective knowledge of the 14 sister institutes which make up the Natural Environment Research Council, spanning all the environmental sciences. The Institute studies the factors determining the structure, composition and processes of land and freshwater systems, and of individual plant and animal species. It is developing a sounder scientific basis for predicting and modelling environmental trends arising from natural or man-made change. The results of this research are available to those responsible for the protection, management and wise use of our natural resources. One quarter of ITE's work is research commissioned by customers, such as the Department of Environment, the European Economic Community, the Nature Conservancy Council and the Overseas Development Administration. The remainder is fundamental research supported by NERC. ITE's expertise is widely used by international organizations In overseas projects and programmes of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses A study of the activity of six species of harvest spiders (arachnida, opiliones) Lenton, Graham M How to cite: Lenton, Graham M (1974) A study of the activity of six species of harvest spiders (arachnida, opiliones), Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8916/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk A STUDY OF THE ACTIVITY OF SIX SPECIES OF HARVEST - SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA, OPILIONES). by GRAHAM M. LENTON B.Sc (READING), Dip.Ed. (VALES) Being A thesis submitted as part of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Advcinced Course in Ecology) in the University of Durham, September 1970. a7 NOV 1974 . SECTION , LfBRARl, CONTENTS PAGE I INTRODUCTION 1 II MATERIALS AND METHODS 3 a) The Species b) The study site, Meteorological Data, Time periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Dicranopalpus Caudatus Dresco, 1948: Not a Synonym of Dicranopalpus Ramosus (Simon, 1909) but a Valid Species After All (Arachnida, Opiliones)
    Revista Ibérica de Aracnología, nº 26 (30/06/2015): 25–34. ARTÍCULO Grupo Ibérico de Aracnología (S.E.A.). ISSN: 1576 - 9518. http://www.sea-entomologia.org DICRANOPALPUS CAUDATUS DRESCO, 1948: NOT A SYNONYM OF DICRANOPALPUS RAMOSUS (SIMON, 1909) BUT A VALID SPECIES AFTER ALL (ARACHNIDA, OPILIONES) Hay Wijnhoven1 & Carlos E. Prieto2 1 Groesbeeksedwarsweg 300, NL-6521 DW Nijmegen, Netherlands. [email protected] 2 Departamento de Zoología y Biología Celular Animal, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV / EHU), PO box 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain. [email protected] Abstract: Dicranopalpus caudatus Dresco, 1948, formerly considered a synonym of Dicranopalpus ramosus (Simon, 1909), is re- validated based on a comparative characterisation of both taxa by studying specimens from the Iberian Peninsula, France, England and The Netherlands. Until now, D. caudatus has been confirmed for Spain, Portugal and England. Both species show allopatric distributions in the Iberian Peninsula, with D. caudatus distributed along the western, southern and eastern Iberian coasts and D. ramosus only on the northern Cantabrian coastal strip. In contrast, both species seem to be sympatric in southern England. How- ever, the current status of D. caudatus in England needs to be assessed, since it was last recorded 30 years ago. Diagnostic char- acters, illustrations and distribution maps are provided for both species. Key words: Opiliones, Dicranopalpus, revalidation, Iberian Peninsula, southern England. Dicranopalpus caudatus Dresco, 1948 no es un sinónimo de Dicranopalpus ramosus (Simon, 1909) sino una especie váli- da, después de todo (Arachnida, Opiliones) Resumen: Estudiando especímenes procedentes de la Península Ibérica, Francia, Inglaterra y Holanda, se revalida Dicranopalpus caudatus Dresco, 1948, anteriormente considerada un sinónimo de Dicranopalpus ramosus (Simon, 1909), en base a una caracterización comparativa de ambos taxones.
    [Show full text]
  • Dicranopalpus Ramosus, a New Species of Harvestman for the Netherlands (Opilionida: Phalangiidae)
    Dicranopalpus ramosus, a new species of harvestman for The Netherlands (Opilionida: Phalangiidae) J.G.M. Cuppen CUPPEN. J.G.M., 1994. DICRANOPALPUS RAMOSUS, A NEW SPECIES OF HARVESTMAN FOR THE NETHER¬ LANDS (OPILIONIDA: PHALANGIIDAE). - ENT. BER., AMST. 54 (9): 176-178. Abstract: The opilionid Dicranopalus ramosus is recorded for the first time from The Netherlands. It was found on walls of some buildings in Ede, province of Gelderland. Short notes on biology and distribution of the species are given. Buurtmeesterweg 16, 6711 HM Ede, The Netherlands. Introduction females) were collected and preserved in 70% ethanol; they are deposited in the collection of In the last review of the Dutch harvestmen the National Natural History Museum (Lei¬ (Spoek, 1975) twenty-one species of Opilio¬ den) and the private collection of P. Koomen. nida are mentioned for The Netherlands. Since then only Opilio canestrinii (Thorell) was ad¬ Identification ded to the Dutch list by Van der Weele (1993). The discovery of Dicranopalpus ramosus (Si¬ Dicranopalpus ramosus (fig. 1) can be easily mon) presents the second addition to this list identified with the keys of Martens (1978) and in a short time. Hillyard & Sankey (1989), which include good illustrations of the most important characters. Also Rambla (1965) and Sankey & Savory Locality (1974) give illustrations of some characters. The first specimens of D. ramosus (2 fema¬ Most characteristic are the very long and les) were collected on 27 October 1993 on the conspicuous pedipalps with a relatively small white-painted walls of the authors house in apophysis at the base of the femur and an ex¬ Ede (Amersfoortco-ordinates 176-451).
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomically Modern Carboniferous Harvestmen Demonstrate Early Cladogenesis and Stasis in Opiliones
    ARTICLE Received 14 Feb 2011 | Accepted 27 Jul 2011 | Published 23 Aug 2011 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1458 Anatomically modern Carboniferous harvestmen demonstrate early cladogenesis and stasis in Opiliones Russell J. Garwood1, Jason A. Dunlop2, Gonzalo Giribet3 & Mark D. Sutton1 Harvestmen, the third most-diverse arachnid order, are an ancient group found on all continental landmasses, except Antarctica. However, a terrestrial mode of life and leathery, poorly mineralized exoskeleton makes preservation unlikely, and their fossil record is limited. The few Palaeozoic species discovered to date appear surprisingly modern, but are too poorly preserved to allow unequivocal taxonomic placement. Here, we use high-resolution X-ray micro-tomography to describe two new harvestmen from the Carboniferous (~305 Myr) of France. The resulting computer models allow the first phylogenetic analysis of any Palaeozoic Opiliones, explicitly resolving both specimens as members of different extant lineages, and providing corroboration for molecular estimates of an early Palaeozoic radiation within the order. Furthermore, remarkable similarities between these fossils and extant harvestmen implies extensive morphological stasis in the order. Compared with other arachnids—and terrestrial arthropods generally—harvestmen are amongst the first groups to evolve fully modern body plans. 1 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 2 Museum für Naturkunde at the Humboldt University Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany. 3 Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.J.G. (email: [email protected]) and for phylogenetic analysis, G.G. (email: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • (Arachnida, Opiliones) from Bitterfeld Amber
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 16: 347-375 (2009) Bitterfeld amber harvestmen 347 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.16.224 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Fossil harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones) from Bitterfeld amber Jason A. Dunlop1, †, Plamen G. Mitov2, ‡ 1 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany 2 Department of Zoology and Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, University of Sofi a, 8 Dragan Tsankov Blvd., 1164 Sofi a, Bulgaria † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:E5948D7A-CB52-4657-902F-4159627C78FC ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:51489928-7A87-4E5C-B8DD-2395534A0405 Corresponding author: Jason A. Dunlop ([email protected]) Academic editor: Pavel Stoev | Received 4 March 2009 | Accepted 4 May 2009 | Published 29 July 2009 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DB5973A9-8CF6-400B-87C4-7A4521BD3117 Citation: Dunlop JA, Mitov PG (2009) Fossil harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones) from Bitterfeld amber. In: Stoev P, Dunlop J, Lazarov S (Eds) A life caught in a spider's web. Papers in arachnology in honour of Christo Deltshev. ZooKeys 16: 347-375. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.16.224 Abstract Fossil harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones, Dyspnoi and Eupnoi) are described from Bitterfeld amber, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin. Th e exact age of this amber has been in dispute, but recent work suggests it is youngest Palaeogene (Oligocene: Chattian). Histricos- toma tuberculatum (Koch & Berendt, 1854), Caddo dentipalpus (Koch & Berendt, 1854), Dicranopalpus ramiger (Koch & Berendt, 1854) and Leiobunum longipes Menge, 1854 – all of which are also known from Eocene Baltic amber – are reported from Bitterfeld amber for the fi rst time.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Leiobunum (Arachnida : Phalangida: Phalangiidae) of North America'
    McGhee, C . R. 1977. The politum group (bulbate species) of Lelobunum (Arachnida: Phalangida : Phalangidae) of North America. J . Arachnol. 3 :151-163 . THE POLITUM GROUP (BULBATE SPECIES) OF LEIOBUNUM (ARACHNIDA : PHALANGIDA: PHALANGIIDAE) OF NORTH AMERICA' Charles R. McGhee Department of Biology Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37130 ABSTRAC T The genus Leiobunum (Arachnida : Phalangida) contains several rather well defined species groups which until now have not been treated as such . The primary characteristic used as a basis for a taxonomic revision of the genus is the morphology of the male intromittent organ. Secondary char- acteristics include male pedipalps, genital operculum and other body features . This paper describes the "Bulbate Species" of Leiobunum which contains only the "Politum Group." It includes descriptions of L. politum Weed, L. bracchiolum, sp . nov ., and L. holtae, sp. nov. Consideration is also given to the possible phylogenetic relationships of these species. INTRODUCTION A recent study of the North American genus Leiobunum utilizing both museum speci- mens and specimens collected from numerous sites throughout the middle and souther n portions of the Appalachian Mountains has resulted in the recognition of several rathe r distinct species groups. The recognition of these groups is considered to be importan t since it offers a somewhat different approach to the problems of taxonomy encountere d by those interested in the species of the genus . Redescriptions and more detailed illustra- tions are included to clarify and perhaps better delineate the nature of previously des- cribed species. Several new species have been described and included in the groups . The morphology of the male intromittent organ is utilized as a primary taxonomi c character in defining species and establishing species groups .
    [Show full text]
  • Programme and Abstracts European Congress of Arachnology - Brno 2 of Arachnology Congress European Th 2 9
    Sponsors: 5 1 0 2 Programme and Abstracts European Congress of Arachnology - Brno of Arachnology Congress European th 9 2 Programme and Abstracts 29th European Congress of Arachnology Organized by Masaryk University and the Czech Arachnological Society 24 –28 August, 2015 Brno, Czech Republic Brno, 2015 Edited by Stano Pekár, Šárka Mašová English editor: L. Brian Patrick Design: Atelier S - design studio Preface Welcome to the 29th European Congress of Arachnology! This congress is jointly organised by Masaryk University and the Czech Arachnological Society. Altogether 173 participants from all over the world (from 42 countries) registered. This book contains the programme and the abstracts of four plenary talks, 66 oral presentations, and 81 poster presentations, of which 64 are given by students. The abstracts of talks are arranged in alphabetical order by presenting author (underlined). Each abstract includes information about the type of presentation (oral, poster) and whether it is a student presentation. The list of posters is arranged by topics. We wish all participants a joyful stay in Brno. On behalf of the Organising Committee Stano Pekár Organising Committee Stano Pekár, Masaryk University, Brno Jana Niedobová, Mendel University, Brno Vladimír Hula, Mendel University, Brno Yuri Marusik, Russian Academy of Science, Russia Helpers P. Dolejš, M. Forman, L. Havlová, P. Just, O. Košulič, T. Krejčí, E. Líznarová, O. Machač, Š. Mašová, R. Michalko, L. Sentenská, R. Šich, Z. Škopek Secretariat TA-Service Honorary committee Jan Buchar,
    [Show full text]