A Commitment to Sustainability by Joe De Dominicis a Commitment to Sustainability 2 Letter from the Editor by Rachel W
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Article from: In The Public Interest June 2013 – Issue 8 Social Insurance & Public Finance Section ISSUE 8 | JUNE 2013 1 A Commitment To Sustainability By Joe De Dominicis A COMMITMENT TO SustainaBILITY 2 Letter From The Editor By Rachel W. Killian Why I am optimistic about having access to the retirement security enjoyed by today’s Canadian retirees. 4 SI&PF Chairperson’s Corner Section Update By Steve Schoonveld By Joe De Dominicis 9 Professional Passion Begets Professional Passion rowing up I was regularly reminded to respect my elders. Clearly many other Ca- By Valerie Paganelli nadians received the same message, putting Canada in elite company as one of 11 Interview With An Actuary In The G the best countries in the world to be a retiree. According to a recent report by the Public Interest Conference Board of Canada, poverty among the elderly in Canada is at a low 6.7 percent. 13 A Brief Survey Of Dual Eligibles And In fact we rank third amongst our Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Develop- The ACA ment (OECD) peers in this area as shown in the chart below from the Conference Board of By Rebecca A. Owen Canada report.i 16 Health Care Reform And The Actuarial Profession By Dwight K. Bartlett ELDERY PROVERTY RATE, LATE 2000S 20 Social Insurance In The Wake Of (PER CENT) The Affordable Care Act By Bob Tate 23 The Nature Of Social Insurance Programs And Their Funds (Part 1 of 2) By Sam Gutterman 28 Social Insurance And Public Finance Pension Research Project Synopsis By Social Insurance and Public Finance Pension Sub-Committee 30 So What? By Andy Large CONTINUED ON PAGE 5 A COMMITMENT TO SustainaBILITY | CONTINUED FROM page 1 The relatively low elderly poverty rate is a direct residency in Canada after age 18 and is provided result of Canada’s Social Security System, con- regardless of their employment history. Both the sisting of means tested floor benefits [OAS (Old OAS and GIS are means-tested. Higher income Age Security)/GIS (Guaranteed Income Supple- seniors have a portion of their OAS benefits ment) plus some provincial programs], plus an “clawed back” after reaching a threshold annual earnings related component [C/QPP (Canada/ retirement income and GIS benefits are not paid Quebec Pension Plan)]. Like social security to pensioners above a certain low income thresh- systems around the world, the sustainability of old. the Canadian system has been strained in recent years by a confluence of factors including, the The second, income related, component to Cana- financial crisis, low fertility rates, aging baby da’s government administered retirement system, 1 boomers, longer life spans, and a decline in re- the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), was established tirement coverage for many citizens, primarily in 1966. CPP benefits are financed solely by due to lower coverage from private sector pen- contributions from working Canadians and their sion plans. In the face of these factors, and in employers. The Quebec Pension Plan (QPP) is comparison to the systems of peer nations, the a sister program for residents in the province of Canadian system has proven rather resilient. Quebec. The CPP and QPP are almost identical. While we are not immune to the risks now facing For a Canadian who works a full career, the social security systems around the world, some CPP and OAS are designed to replace roughly prudent decisions have helped mitigate those 40 percent of income, up to the national aver- risks, helping to ensure that the Canadian Social age wage ($51,100 in 2013).ii As of March 31, Security System will be available for future gen- 2013, the maximum basic benefit a retiring Ca- erations; these include: nadian could receive from CPP and OAS, com- 1. Better Funding: Moving the CPP from a bined, is $18,702.84. Many Canadians aspire to pay-as-you-go system to a partially funded have retirement income in excess of that amount. system, However, CPP and OAS are only meant to pro- vide a foundation on which working Canadians 2. Better Governance: An increased focus on can build. At the same time they ensure that, at oversight, transparency and intergeneration- a minimum, most Canadian seniors retire above al equity, and the poverty level. 3. Plan Changes: Recent benefit changes pro- Since the Canadian Social Security System was viding incentives for Canadians to retire established, the programs have been amended on later. many occasions to reflect changing needs and to help preserve the sustainability of a system so BACKGROUND many Canadians cherish. The Canadian system is The foundation, or floor, of Canada’s Social Se- certainly not immune to the risks now facing so- curity System is the Old Age Security (OAS) cial security systems around the world, but some program. The main components of the OAS pro- prudent plan changes and decisions have helped gram are the Old Age Security Pension and, for mitigate those risks and have made the Canadian Canada’s lowest income seniors, the additional system one of the most resilient. Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) and Al- lowances. The OAS program is financed from THE SHIFT FROM PAY-AS-YOU-GO general tax revenues of the Federal Government TO PARTIALLY FUNDED and provides a flat monthly benefit to most Ca- The 1996/1997 review of the CPP revealed that, nadian citizens, on or after age 65, based on their in its pay-as-you-go form, the plan was no lon- CONTINUED ON PAGE 6 JUNE 2013 | IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST | 5 A COMMITMENT TO SustainaBILITY | FROM page 5 ... the financing ger sustainable. For example, in 1996 the con- funded basis called steady-state funding, where tributions collected were $11 billion, but $17 an asset reserve is accumulated with the goal of of the CPP was billion in benefits were paid out.iii It was clear maintaining a stable asset/expenditure ratio. that, given a rapidly aging population, the ratio of changed from a pay- the number of workers contributing to the num- The higher contributions were used to create the as-you-go basis to ber of retirees drawing benefits would continue asset reserve to partially fund the CPP. In addi- to decline, making the plan increasingly unman- tion, the CPP Investment Board (CPPIB) was a partially funded ageable—the chief actuary concluded that the created to manage and invest the assets at arm’s plan’s reserves would be completely exhausted length from the government, for the sole purpose basis. ... by 2015.iv of maintaining the sustainability of the plan. As of Dec. 31, 2012, the CPPIB had $172.6 billion In response to this imminent problem, federal under management. The 25th Actuarial Report and provincial finance ministers recommended on the Canada Pension Plan as of Dec. 31, 2009, and made a number of reforms to help ensure the prepared by the Office of the Chief Actuary con- long-term sustainability of the CPP. In addition cluded that, under best estimate assumptions, the to various benefit changes, the total level of con- CPP is “expected to be able to meet its obliga- tributions was increased gradually from the 1997 tions throughout the projection period and re- rate of 6 percent to 9.9 percent by 2003. And, main financially stable over the long term.” v, 2, 3 most importantly, the financing of the CPP was changed from a pay-as-you-go basis to a partially INCREASED FOCUS ON OVERSIGHT, TRANSPARENCY AND INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY In addition to moving from pay-as-you-go fi- nancing to a partially funded CPP, the 1997 re- forms also increased the frequency for reviewing the CPP from once every five years to once every three years. In the event that a review reveals that legislated contribution rates are no longer suffi- cient to maintain the stability of the CPP, “self- sustaining” provisions have been implemented to allow certain benefits to be decreased if legis- lated contribution rates are not increased. A full funding provision was also included to en- sure that any future increases to CPP benefits are fully funded with contributions that are in addi- tion to the regular, steady-state required contri- butions. This provision ensures that the costs of benefit improvements are not passed on to future generations. The 1997 reforms were instrumental in helping to ensure the sustainability of programs. More recent changes continue to demonstrate a com- mitment to maintaining these programs. 6 | IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST | JUNE 2013 RECENT CHANGES TO MITIGATE will continue to threaten the sustainability of our THE IMPACTS OF INCREASING system. However, past decisions demonstrate, at LONGEVITY the very least, the willingness of the stewards of Like most citizens in the developed world, Ca- our Canadian system to take action when needed nadians are living longer and therefore drawing to protect the retirement stability now enjoyed retirement benefits longer than in the past, and by most Canadian seniors. All of which increase longer than was anticipated when our social se- the chances that future generations will have ac- curity system was first designed. cess to some form of government administered retirement income, even if it may not provide the In his speech to the World Economic Forum in level of retirement security now enjoyed by my Joe De Dominicis, January 2012, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen parents and their peers. FSA, FCIA, is staff Harper verbalized his concerns about the com- fellow—Canadian ing demographic threat, “Our demographics also REFERENCES Membership, for the constitute a threat to the social programs and ser- Society of Actuaries. He can be contacted vices that Canadians cherish.