DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Supreme Court of Ohio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Supreme Court of Ohio IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Colunibus Southern Company Case No. 09-2298 Appellant, Appeal from Public V. Utilities Commission of Ohio The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Appellee. Case No. 08-917-EL-SSO MERIT BR1EF AND APPENDIX OF APPELLANT COLUMBUS SOUTIIERN POWER COMPANY Matvin I. Resnik (0005695) Ricliard Cordray (0038034) Counsel of Record Attonrey General of Ohio Kevin F. Duffy (0005867) Duane W. Luckey (0023557) Steven "T. Nonrse (0046705) Chief, Public Utilities Section Matthew J.Satterwhite (0071972) Werner L. Margard 111 (0024858) Anrerican Electric Power Service Thomas G. Lindgren (0039210) Corporation John H.Jones(0051913) I Riverside Plaza, 29Floor Assistant Attorneys General Colutnbus, Ohio 43215-2373 180 East Broad Street Telephone: (614) 716-1606 Columbus, Ohio 43215-3793 Facsimile: (614) 716-2950 Teleplione: (614) 644-8698 miresnikr),aep.com Facsunile: (614) 644-8764 kfduffy^c^aep.com duane.luckey a yuc.statc.oh.us stnourseL^,aepeont. [email protected] m'tsatterwlute kaep^con thonras.lin Lrennpuc. state. oli.us l'o lm.iones(^pue.state.oh.us Daniel R. Conway (0023058) Counsel for Appellee, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP Public Utilities Cotnniission of Ohio 41 South lligh Street Columbus, Ohio 43215 Telephone: (614) 227-2270 Facsimilc: (614) 227-2100 dconwa cJ orterwright.com Counsel for Appellant, Colutnbus Southern Power Company Samuel C. Randazzo (0016386) Janine L. Migden-Ostrander (0002310) (Counsel oCRecord) Consuniers' Counsel Lisa G. McAlister (0075043) Terry Etter (0067445) Joseph M. Clark (0080711) Counsel of Record McNees Wallace & Nuriclc LLC Maw•een R. Grady (0020847) 21 East State Street, 17"' Floor Assistant Consumers' Counsel Columbus, Ohio 43215 Offiee of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel Telephone: 614-469-8000 10 West Broad Street, Suite 1800 Facs imil e: 614-469-4633 Columbas, Ohio 43215-3485 sarn c^mwncmh.com Telephone: 614-466-8574 [email protected] Facsimile: 614-466-9475 iclark(c)mwncmh.com etter(a)occ.statc.oh.us pady_r @occ.state.oh.us Counsel for Intervening Appellee, Industrial Energy Users-Ohio Counsel for Intervening Appellee, Office of the Ohio Consrnners' Counsel David F. Boehm Michael L. Kurtz Boelun Kurtz & Lowry 36 East Seventh Street, Suite 1510 Cincimlati, Ohio 45202 Tel ephone: 513 -421-22 5 5 Facsimile: 513-421-2764 dboefin(cJ,BKLlawftrm.com mkurtz(ci)BKLlawfirm. com Counsel for Intervening Appellee, Oliio Energy Group TABLE OF CONTENETS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIF,S ........................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF FACTS AND OF THE CASE ......................................................... 1 STANDARD OF REVIEW ............................................................................................. 7 ARGU MENT .................................................................................................................... 8 Proposition of Law No. 1 When the Public Utilities Commissiou of Ohio considers an application for approval to sell or transfer generating assets which never have been included in the electric distribution atility's plant-in-service for rate making purposes at the same time it considers the utility's Electric Security Plan application, it is unlawfid for the Commission to deny the authority to sell or transfer those assets and at the same time refuse to allow, as part of the Electric Security Plan, an adjustment for costs associated with maintaining and operating those same assets ................................................................................................... 8 CONCLUSI ON ............................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX PROOF OF SERVICE TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES AT&T Comn2unications of Ohio, Inc. v. Piub. Util. Comm. (2000), 88 Ohio St. 3d 549, 555 ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Constellation IVewF,nergy, Inc. v. Pub, Util. Comm. (2004), 104 Ohio St.3d 530 ............. 7 Discoaent Cellular, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 112 Ohio St. 3d 360, 2007-Ohio-53, ¶51 ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Monongahela Power Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (2004), 104 Ohio St.3d 571 ...................... 7 Myer.s v. Pub. Util. Comna., (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 299, 302 ............................................. 7 Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. UtiC. Contrn. (2009), 121 Ohio St. 3d 362, 365........... 7 O&io F,dison Co. v. Pub. Util. Contm. (1997), 78 Ohio St. 3d 466, 469 ............................ 7 Tongren v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1999), 85 Ohio St. 3d 87, 88 ............................................ 13 OHIO REVISED CODE SECTIONS R.C. 4903.13 ....................................................................................................................... 7 R.C. 4909.05 ....................................................................................................................... 9 R.C. 4909.15 ..................................................................................................................9, 12 R.C. 4909.19 ...............................................................................................................:....... 9 R. C. 4928.141 ................................................................................................................. 1,8 R.C. 4928J 42 ..................................................................................................................1, 8 R.C. 4928.143 ..................................................................................................1, 7, 9, 10, 13 R.C. 4928.17 ................................................................................................... 2, 3, 5, 6, 8,9 OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE Sec. 4901:1-37-09, Ohio Admin. Code .............................................................................. 4 MISCELLANEOUS Ponner R.C. 4928.17 .......................................................................................................... 2 ii IN TIIE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Columbus Southern Company Case No. 09-2298 Appellant, Appeal from Public V. Utilities Commission of Ohio The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Appellee. Case No. 08-917-EL-SSO MERIT BRIEF AND APPENDIX OF APPELLANT COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY STATEMF,NT OF FACTS AND OF THE CASE With the enactrnent of Am. Sub. S. B. 221 (SB 221) by Ohio's 127"' General Assembly, Ohio's electric distribution companies were required by R.C. 4928.141 (A) to "apply to the public utilities coinmission to establish the standard service offer in accordance with section 4928.142 or 4928.143 of the Revised Code. ..." Appellant Columbus Southern Power Company (CSP) and its affiliate Ohio Power Company, both of which are electric utility operating company subsidiaries of American Electric Power Company, lnc., each filed applications with the Public Utilities Connnission of Ohio (Commission) for approval of Electric Security Plans (ESP) under R.C. 4928.143. These applications were filed on July 31, 2008, fne effective date of 5B 221. (CSP App. p. 37). In addition to seeking approval of its proposed ESP, CSP sought approval for the sale or transfer of certain of its generating assets. Commission appi-oval of the sale or transfer was nceessitated by an amendment made by SB 221 to the veision of R.C. 4928.17 (E) enacted as part of Am. Sub. S.B. 3 (SB 3). Prior to this particular amendment, R.C. 4928.17 (E) provided that: Notwithstauding section 4905.20, 4905.21, 4905.46, or 4905.48 of the Revised Code, an electric utility may divest itself of auy generating asset at any timc without commission approval, subject to the provisions of Title XLIX of the Revised Code relating to the transfer of transmission, distribution, or ancillary service provided by such generating asset. (emphasis added). Former R.C. 4928.17 (E); CSP App. p. 23 (Enrphasis added). Division (E) was an appropriate complement to the remainder of R.C. 4928.17 wliich was enacted in 1999 as part of Am. Sub. S. B. 3, (SB 3), and which was an integral part of the General Assembly's restructuring the regulation of Ohio's electric utilities, particularly the newly effective competitive electric generation function of those utilities. This Section required, and continues to require, a cotporate separation plan that at a minimum: "[provides for] competitive retail electric service ... t1u•ough a fully separated affiliate of the utility;" "satisfies the public interest in preventing unfair competitive advantage;" and "is sufficient to ensure that the utility will not extend any undue preference or advantage to any affiliate, division, or part of its own business engaged in the business of supplying the competitive retail electric service ... and to ensure that any such affrliate, division, or part will not receive undue preference or advantage from any affiliate, division, or part of the business engaged in [the] business of supplying the noncompetitive retail electric service." R.C. 4928.17 (A) (1) (2) and (3); CSP App. p. 20. While SB 221 did not make any changes to the underlying requirement for corporate separation of the generation funetion from the utiiity's noncompetitive fiinctions, division (E) was amended to read as follows: 2 No electric distribution utility shall sell or transfer any generaling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Voluntary Electricity Trading Can Help Efficiency in the Southeast 1 Figure 1: Potential Southeast Energy Exchange Market Footprint
    CONTENTS Introduction 1 Discussions of a Southeast Energy Exchange Market 2 Organized Wholesale Electricity Markets Explained 2 Overview of Energy Imbalance Markets 3 CAISO’s Western EIM 4 SPP’s Western Energy Imbalance Service Market 6 Regulatory Approvals and Governance 7 A Standalone EIM 8 Less-structured Wholesale Trading Agreements 8 Conclusion 9 About the Authors 10 Figure 1: Potential Southeast Energy Exchange Market Footprint 2 Figure 2: Regional Transmission Organizations 3 Figure 3: Current and Planned Participants in CAISO’s Western EIM 4 Figure 4: Real-Time Energy Prices in Western EIM 5 Figure 5: Combined Footprints of Utilities Joining SPP’s Proposed EIM 7 Table 1: Estimated and Actual Utility Savings in Joining R STREET POLICY STUDY NO. 201 CAISO Western EIM 6 August 2020 financial situation.2 Dissatisfaction over such financial mis- management and demand for more renewable energy have led lawmakers and stakeholders to question whether more fundamental departures from the current utility regulatory model make sense. For example, North Carolina’s House Bill 958 could require investor-owned utilities to join or create a HOW VOLUNTARY ELECTRICITY regional transmission entity, and both of the Carolinas’ leg- TRADING CAN HELP EFFICIENCY islatures plan to study the potential benefits of such entities.3 The primary example of a regional transmission entity—a IN THE SOUTHEAST Regional Transmission Organization (RTO)—comes with a governance structure to ensure that the transmission system By Jennifer Chen and Michael Bardee is transparently operated independently of any particular utility. This helps provide open access to the transmission INTRODUCTION system, and thus the electricity markets for the organiza- tion’s member generators.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Company Town Hall Webcast – Thursday, April 16, 2020 Rough Transcript
    Southern Company Town Hall Webcast – Thursday, April 16, 2020 Rough Transcript Operator: Welcome to the Southern Company town hall webcast on April 16th, 2020. Throughout today's recorded presentation, all participants will be in a listen only mode. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. If you would like to ask a question via the web interface, simply type your question in the ask a question box and click send. If any participant has difficulty hearing the presentation, please submit your question via the same tool. I will now hand the presentation over to Tom Fanning, chairman, president, and CEO of Southern Company. Please go ahead, sir. Tom Fanning: Welcome, everybody, to this virtual town hall. I think in times like this, I love that phrase, communicate relentlessly. I don't think there's more we can do than keeping each other informed. And I think through the thought leadership of folks like Chris Womack and others, we decided this format may prove to be beneficial to us all. And to those of you who have not been on a call like this, this is going to feel like something we do about every two weeks. In fact, during the coronavirus, we've been doing it for a while every day, and then maybe three times a week. Now we're doing it about twice a week. This will feel like a Southern Company Management Council call with a little bit of an expanded universe. I know we have people all over the system listening, so let me just fill you in, roughly, on who's on the Southern Company Management Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusive Economic Development Fact Sheet
    ATL Action for Racial Equity Powered by the Metro Atlanta Chamber MEDIA FACT SHEET – Inclusive Economic Development Playbook Metro Atlanta is well-positioned to lead the nation as a destination of choice for Black entrepreneurship, at the intersection of momentum and diverse innovation, with a business community intentionally aligned around Inclusive Economic Development. Diverse and Thriving Business Environment • Of large metro areas, metro Atlanta ranks first with the greatest population share of Black residents1. o 34.7% of the Atlanta MSA’s population is Black or African American vs. 12.8% of the U.S. population1. • Thirty companies headquartered in metro Atlanta are among the 2020 Fortune 1000, of which 16 companies ranked in the elite Fortune 500. In fiscal year 2019, these 30 companies generated aggregate revenues of $438 billion2. • A wide array of metro Atlanta-based Fortune 1000 and other leading organizations have implemented a supplier diversity program, including: o AT&T, Atlanta Braves, Atlanta Gas Light, Coca-Cola Company, Delta Air Lines, Emory University, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Georgia Institute of Technology, The Home Depot, UPS and Zoo Atlanta, among others3. o Atlanta-based Southern Company employs comprehensive strategies that improve and build on positive impact of partnerships with diverse suppliers. This work is led by the company’s General Manager, Supplier Sustainability & Equity, Vickie Irwin. Building from a Strong Foundation of Inclusive Economic Development • Atlanta-based Black-owned employer firms employ more than 62,000 people and generate nearly $7 billion in average annual revenue4. • Atlanta ranks as the No. 3 U.S. metro for Black-owned employer firms4.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Connection Zone'
    ‘THE CONNECTION ZONE’ 27, 2015 March 26- March The floor at the 2015 CEFGA CareerExpo and SkillsUSA State Championsh ips is huge - roughly the size of six football fields, and busy, too. More than 7,300 people moved through the event in 2015. 2015 CEFGA CareerExpo, SkillsUSA Championships Draw Record Attendance CEFGA CAREER EXPO AND SKILLS USA STATE CHAMPIONSHIPS CEFGA CAREER EXPO AND SKILLS USA STATE Annual Event Links Students, Industry Professionals By Allen Allnoch !CEFGA Feature Writer As Bryan Tapia walked toward the rear entrance of the Georgia International Convention Center, he tried to get his mind around what he had just experienced. Behind him was a dizzying array of earth-moving equipment, and he and two Coosa High classmates, Eric Vargas and Israel Domingo, had !sat in the driver’s seat and operated each one. “I’m speechless,” said a wide-eyed Tapia, an 11th-grader who was attending his first CEFGA CareerExpo and SkillsUSA State Championships. “I thought it would be something where you could look at a lot of things, but there are a lot of opportunities where you can actually work the equipment and really have a hands-on experience. It’s mind-blowing.” (continued on Pg. 2) "1 The Connection Zone ! 2015 (continued from Pg. 1) With a record 7,307 attendees – including whole. I think the biggest joy for me is when we 5,179 students from 236 schools and 1,208 can get new people and companies to come industry representatives from 326 organizations out and see the event. As soon as they walk in – and a floor space the size of six football and see the kids and the instructors and the fields, the March 26-27 event certainly fit level of professionalism associated with the March 26-27, March Tapia’s description.
    [Show full text]
  • 17GEC Attendee Listing W Emails
    First Name Last Name Company City St Email Address Steve Adams Kleinfelder Mount Dora FL [email protected] Amy Addison AMA Environmental Services, LLC Leesburg GA [email protected] Ryan Adolphson University of Georgia Athens GA [email protected] Patrick Ahlm Wenck & Associates Minneapolis MN [email protected] Anthony Ahmed Raven Engineered Films Sioux Falls SD [email protected] Garrow Alberson City of Brunswick Brunswick GA [email protected] Sergie Albino ecoSPEARS Winter Park FL [email protected] Ruth Albright SynTerra Corporation Greenville SC [email protected] Shanna Alexander GA Environmental Protection Division Atlanta GA [email protected] Constance Alexander US Environmental Protection Agency Atlanta GA [email protected] Meredith Allen GeoAdvisers, L.L.C. Savannah GA [email protected] Jerry Allen ALS Houston TX [email protected] Sheridan Alonso American Env. & Construction Services Alpharetta GA Jon Ambrose Nongame Conservation Division, GA DNR Atlanta GA [email protected] Justin Amiro ILS Salley SC [email protected] Barry Amos City of Atlanta Atlanta GA [email protected] Kristofor Anderson Georgia Environmental Finance Authority Atlanta GA [email protected] Scott Anderson HRP Associates, Inc Greenville SC [email protected] Michelle Andotra USDOT/FHWA Atlanta GA [email protected] Titus Andrews Fort Valley State University Dublin GA [email protected] Jill Andrews GADNR Coastal Resources Division Brunswick GA [email protected] David Anthony Pace Analytical Services, LLC Peachtree Corners GA [email protected] Shan Arora Southface Atlanta GA Rod Arters EnviroWorkshops.com Davidson NC [email protected] Joseph Baggett Stantec Nashville TN [email protected] Katrina Bagwell EPS, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Company 2007 Annual Report
    SOUTHERN COMPANY 2007 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL FacingSOUTHERN COMPANY ... 2007 ANNUAL REPORT SOUTHERNCOMPANY.COM GLOSSARY Alternative Fuels – any non-conventional substance that can be Megawatt – one thousand kilowatts. A measurement of electricity used as fuel, such as ethanol and methane. usually used when discussing large amounts of generating capacity. Book Value – a company’s common stock equity as it appears on Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) – an independent federal a balance sheet, equal to total assets minus liabilities, preferred agency that formulates policies and develops regulations govern- and preference stock, and intangible assets such as goodwill. ing nuclear reactor and nuclear material safety, issues orders to Book value per share refers to the book value of a company licensees, and adjudicates legal matters. divided by the number of shares outstanding. Payout Ratio – the percentage of earnings that is paid to share- Co-Firing – a process of converting biomass to electricity by holders in the form of dividends. adding biomass as a supplemental fuel to coal, thus reducing Public Service Commission (PSC) – the authority that regulates the amount of coal used to generate electricity. utilities at the state level. Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) – Renewable Portfolio Standards – legislative or regulatory poli- a license granted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that cies that require the increased production of renewable energy gives the licensee approval to both construct and operate a sources such as wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal energies. nuclear unit. Retail Markets – markets in which energy is sold and delivered Competitive Generation Business – market-based wholesale directly to the ultimate end-users of that energy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    2020 Annual Report Opportunity Contents 2 Chairman’s Message 5 Financial Highlights 6 Can America achieve global leadership in carbon-free nuclear energy? 8 Can we sustain our people during a global pandemic? 10 Do we expect to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050? 12 Can we achieve a more just and equitable society? 14 Leadership 16 Financial Review (On the cover) Garland Solar Facility in Kern County, California (Shown here) Skookumchuck Wind Facility, located in Lewis and Thurston Counties, Washington In 2020 we saw the advent of unique challenges unlike any our nation has experienced in recent memory. From a global pandemic to the tragic deaths of George Floyd and other Black men and women, we have grappled with issues that have fundamentally changed the way we live, work and view societal progress. We acknowledge the gravity of these issues. But at Southern Company, we don’t just see challenges, we see opportunity. We see opportunities for a safer workplace and a more equitable society. Opportunities to advance new technologies for cleaner energy. We are fixed on the idea of “yes, and.” Yes, we acknowledge the challenge, and we are committed to finding a solution. Explore this report to learn more about how we are embracing opportunity. providing clean, safe, reliable and affordable energy through electric operating companies in three states, states, in three companies electric operating through energy and affordable reliable clean, safe, providing Southern Company serves 9 million customers through its subsidiaries, through 9 million customers serves Southern Company a fiber company, infrastructure energy America, a distributed across customers wholesale serving company generation a competitive states, in four companies distribution gas natural services.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for a Low-Carbon Future a Letter from the CEO
    Planning for a low-carbon future A letter from the CEO The energy sector is rapidly evolving, driven by customer preferences, technology advancements, commodity prices, energy security and resiliency efforts, and environmental, social and governance initiatives. With evolution comes opportunity and Southern Company, with its customer- centric business model, is poised to provide continued value to our customers and communities in this evolving energy landscape. We have a long history of proactive, goals are a continuation of our our carbon emission reduction constructive engagement and trajectory of lower carbon emissions goals are no exception. Combined dialogue with shareholders, over the past 10 years, which have with our objective of delivering customers and other stakeholders resulted in a 36 percent reduction regular, predictable and sustainable around the path forward in a low- since 2007. Similarly, our use of coal earnings and dividend growth, carbon future, and we understand for power generation has declined our collective goal is to provide the need for a broader focus on by almost 60 percent; in 2017, coal premier risk-adjusted returns to the financial, operational and represented only 28 percent of our shareholders. regulatory risks that come with our energy mix as compared to 69 reducing carbon emissions over the percent in 2007. I am confident that we are prepared long term. We are committed to and well-positioned to meet the keeping everyone informed as we Over the long term, meeting our needs of our customers well into move forward. goals will require energy policies the future and to succeed in this that support low natural gas transition to a low-carbon future.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement Investor Fact Sheet
    Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement Investor Fact Sheet One of America’s Premier Energy Companies 2016 Energy Mix for Southern Company — 46,000 megawatts of electric generating capacity and 1,500 billion cubic feet of combined natural 47% gas consumption and throughput volume serving approximately 9.0 million electric and gas customers through 11 premier state-regulated utilities, a 31% competitive generation company serving wholesale customers across America and a nationally-recognized provider of customized energy solutions. 15% — Consistently listed among the top U.S. electric service 5% providers by American Customer Satisfaction Index. 2% — Ranked among best employers for minorities Nturl Col Nucler Renewbles H dro/ and veterans. Gs Other — Goal to maximize long-term value to stockholders through a customer, community and relationship- focused business model that produces sustainable What Distinguishes Southern Company levels of return on energy infrastructure. Electric Operating Companies Financial Integrity — Only electric utility system in the U.S. committed to developing the full portfolio of generation resources – — Goal of achieving an attractive risk-adjusted return, natural gas, 21st century coal, nuclear and renewables supported by a simple, transparent business model such as wind and solar – together with an emphasis on and sound financial policy. energy efficiency. — Experienced management focused on creating and Southern Company Gas delivering value. — Largest natural gas distribution operator in the U.S. — Goal of supporting a strong credit profile and with seven state-regulated local distribution companies preserving the ability to invest in additional value- (LDCs), serving over 4.5 million customers. Midstream accretive projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the U.S. DEPARTMENT of ENERGY Washington, DC 20585 in the Matter of Implementing the National Broadband Plan by Studying
    Before the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Washington, DC 20585 In the Matter of ) ) Implementing the National ) NBP RFI: Communications Requirements Broadband Plan by Studying the ) Communications Requirements of ) Electric Utilities to Inform ) Federal Smart Grid Policy ) RESPONSE OF SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC. Southern Company Services, Inc. (“Southern Company”), on behalf of itself and its operating affiliates, hereby submits its response to the Department of Energy’s (“DOE’s”) Request for Information (“RFI”), released May 5, 2010, about current and projected communications requirements of electric utilities in “sustaining and modernizing the [electric] grid, as well as the types of networks and communications services that may be used.”1 Southern Company was an active participant in proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) leading to the FCC’s release of the National Broadband Plan (“NBP”) and appreciates the opportunity to provide DOE 2 with information responsive to the specific questions raised in the RFI. 1 75 Fed.Reg. 26206, 26207 (published May 11, 2010). 2 Southern Company addressed many of the same, or similar, issues in its Comments to the FCC with respect to NBP Public Notice #2 in GN Docket Nos. 09-47, 09-51, and 09-137, filed October 2, 2009. Southern Company hereby incorporates these Comments by reference, and appends as Attachment A hereto a copy of these Comments. Southern Company Services, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary service company of Southern Company, a super-regional energy company in the Southeast United States. Southern Company also owns four electric utility subsidiaries – Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company, Gulf Power Company, and Mississippi Power Company – which provide retail and wholesale electric service throughout a 120,000 square mile service territory in Georgia, most of Alabama, and parts of Florida and Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Special Conference Program
    The 31st Annual International Women in Aviation Conference Empowering women around the globe. United is proud to support Women in Aviation International. ©2020 United Airlines, Inc. All rights reserved. WELCOME TO WAI2020 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4 Contents 7:45 a.m.-5 p.m. TOUR: Kennedy Space Center Tour Convention Center Porte Cochere Conference Schedule (ticket required, lunch not included) 23 Registration Open Sponsored by American Airlines 24 Seminars and Workshops 3-6 p.m. Veracruz C Yoga, Mindfulness, Zumba 6:30-7:30 p.m. WAI Chapter Reception Sponsored by Envoy Air Fiesta 6 24 (ticket required/by invitation only) 26 Education Sessions Friday, March 6 THURSDAY, MARCH 5 30 Education Sessions Saturday, March 7 Yoga Class 7-8 a.m. Fiesta 9 Conference Sponsors 8-11 a.m. WAI Chapter Leadership Workshop Sponsored by ConocoPhillips Durango 1 32 Registration Open Sponsored by American Airlines 32 Student Conference 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Veracruz C Sponsors 7:45-11:30 a.m. TOUR: Disney’s Business Behind the Magic Convention Center Porte Cochere (ticket required, lunch not included) 34 WAI Board 8:30-10:30 a.m. Professional Development Seminar Sponsored by XOJET Fiesta 5 34 New Members Connect Seen! Increasing Your Visibility and Influence (ticket required) 34 Meet and Greet With 9:15 a.m.-3:45 p.m. TOUR: Embraer Facility (ticket required, includes lunch) Convention Center Porte Cochere the WAI Board Minute Mentoring® Sponsored by Walmart Aviation 9-10:30 a.m. Coronado C 34 Annual Membership (preregistration required) Meeting and Board of 9-noon Aerospace Educators Workshop Sponsored by Walmart Aviation Coronado F Directors Elections (preregistration required) 36 WAI Corporate Members 10:15 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Lights Come to Georgia Atlanta Was One of the First Cities in Georgia to Demand Electric Lighting
    o Our Promise to You o Our Leadership Electric lights come to Georgia Atlanta was one of the first cities in Georgia to demand electric lighting. In 1883, its citizens organized and promoted the formation of an electric company. It seems they were motivated by a spirit of pride, in that they did not want Atlanta to lag behind other towns in acquiring this great invention. The citizens raised $3,500 in a stock offering and formed the Georgia Electric Light Company of Atlanta. The company received a franchise to “serve patrons from a central station, or from isolated plants, electric lights for stores, dwellings, machine shops, depots, inside and out, or to introduce said lights wherever desired.” Later that year, the new company entered into a contract to purchase an electric light plant of 45 lights for the sum of $8,500 from the Southern Light Company of New York. In 1884, the company built a 940 kilowatt generating plant on Marietta and Spring streets and installed 22 electric street lights. By 1889, half the generation from the plant was powering 800 streetlights; the rest was being used to operate another new invention, electric streetcars. In 1891, an Atlanta banker named Henry Atkinson began pulling together the foundation of what was to become Georgia Power Company. He became a shareholder in Georgia Electric Light Company of Atlanta, and a year later, he quietly accumulated enough stock to take control of the operation. Atkinson was the perfect person to take hold of a fledgling electric company, which he now simply called Georgia Electric Light Company.
    [Show full text]