FIP Investment Plan for Democratic Republic of Congo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FIP Investment Plan for Democratic Republic of Congo FIP/SC.6/4 June 7, 2011 Meeting of the FIP Sub-Committee Cape Town, South Africa June 29 and 30, 2011 Agenda Item 5 INVESTMENT PLAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO Proposed Decision by FIP Sub-Committee The FIP Sub-Committee, having reviewed the Investment Plan for the Democratic Republic of Congo, (document FIP/SC.6/4), a) endorses the Investment Plan as a basis for the further development of the projects foreseen in the plan and takes note of the requested funding of USD60million in grant funding. The Sub-Committee reconfirms its decision on the allocation of resources, adopted at its meeting in November 2010, that a range of funding for the country should be used as a planning tool in the further development of project and program proposals to be submitted to the FIP Sub-Committee for FIP funding approval, recognizing that the minimum amount of the range is more likely and that the upper limit of the range will depend on availability of funding. The range of funding agreed for the Democratic Republic of Congo is USD 40-60 million in FIP resources. The Sub-Committee also recognizes that the quality of the proposed activities will be a significant factor in the funding to be approved by the Sub-Committee when project and program proposals are submitted for approval of FIP funding. b) approves a total of USD1.6million in FIP funding as a preparation grant for the following projects, i. USD300,000 for the project “Addressing Deforestation and Degradation in the Kinshasa Supply Area”, (World Bank) ii. USD400,000 for the project “Addressing Deforestation and Degradation in the Mbuji Mayi/Kananga Supply Area”, (AfDB) iii. USD400,000 for the project “Addressing Deforestation and Degradation in the Kisangani Supply Area”, (AfDB) iv. USD250,000 for the project “Small Grants Program to Promising Small-scale REDD+ Initiatives”, (World Bank) v. USD250,000 for the project “Engaging private sector in REDD+ in DRC”, (World Bank) to be developed under the investment plan; c) takes note of the estimated budget for project preparation and supervision services for the project(s) referenced above and approves a first tranche of funding for MDB preparation and supervision services as follows1: i. USD300,000 for the project “Addressing Deforestation and Degradation in the Kinshasa Supply Area”, (World Bank) 1 For private sector projects, MDB preparation and supervision costs are determined at investment development stage and requested at a later point in time. ii. US300,000 for the project “Addressing Deforestation and Degradation in the Mbuji Mayi/Kananga Supply Area”, (AfDB) iii. USD300,000 for the project “Addressing Deforestation and Degradation in the Kisangani Supply Area”, (AfDB) iv. USD300,000 for the project “Small Grants Program to Promising Small-scale REDD+ Initiatives”, (World Bank) v. USD250,000 for the project “Engaging private sector in REDD+ in DRC”, (World Bank) d) requests the Government of the Democratic Republic of Congo and the MDBs to take into account all written comments submitted by Sub-Committee members by July 15, 2011 in the further development of the projects. Dem ocratic Republic of Congo Ministry of Environment , Nature Conservation and Tourism Forest Investment Program Investment Plan 30/05/2011 Table of Content SUMMARY OF COUNTRY INVESTMENT PLAN ................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 10 TABLE OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................................... 15 FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................... 16 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE NATIONAL AND SECTORAL CONTEXT ................................................................... 17 1.1. CAUSES AND FACTORS OF DEFORESTATION ...................................................................................... 17 1.2. THE INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM FOR REDD+ PREPARATION ........................................................... 20 1.3. FOREST GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS ................................................................................................ 23 2. INVENTORY OF GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION POSSIBILITIES ............................................................... 23 3. COMPATIBILITY OF THE POLITICAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK WITH THE REDD+ PROGRAMS ..... 25 3.1. THE LAND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................... 25 3.2. THE BIOMASS ENERGY VALUE-CHAIN FRAMEWORK .......................................................................... 26 3.3. BARRIERS TO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INVESTMENT ............................................................................. 27 4. COLLABORATION WITH MULTILATERAL DEVELOPMENT BANKS AND OTHER PARTNERS ....................... 28 5. IDENTIFICATION AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROGRAMS TO BE CO-FINANCED BY THE FIP .................. 33 5.1. CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................... 33 5.2. SELECTION OF ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................. 34 5.2.1. SECTORAL ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................................... 34 5.2.2. ENABLING ACTIVITIES ......................................................................................................................... 39 5.3. SELECTION OF GEOGRAPHIC AREAS ................................................................................................... 41 5.4. PROGRAMS PROPOSED ..................................................................................................................... 43 5.4.1. THE KINSHASA SUPPLY AREA PROGRAM ................................................................................................ 44 5.4.2. THE KANANGA & MBUJI -MAYI SUPPLY AREA PROGRAM ........................................................................... 47 5.4.3. THE KISANGANI SUPPLY AREA PROGRAM .............................................................................................. 49 5.4.4. THE PROGRAM FOR ENGAGING PRIVATE SECTOR IN REDD+ ....................................................................... 51 5.4.5. SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM SUPPORTING INNOVATING INITIATIVES WITH STRONG CO -BENEFITS .......................... 52 5.5. COMPLIANCE WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF THE FIP ............................................................................... 54 6. EXPECTED CO-BENEFITS FROM FIP INVESTMENTS ................................................................................. 54 7. IMPLEMENTATION POTENTIAL AND EVALUATION OF RISKS .................................................................. 56 7.1. EVALUATION OF RISKS ....................................................................................................................... 56 7.2. IMPLEMENTATION POTENTIAL .......................................................................................................... 57 8. PLAN AND FINANCING INSTRUMENTS ................................................................................................... 60 9. PRELIMINARY RESULT FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................................... 63 APPENDIX 1: PROPOSED PROGRAMS ............................................................................................................. 66 Program 1 (geographic): Kinshasa supply area ............................................................................................ 67 Program 2 (geographic): Kananga & Mbuji-Mayi supply area .................................................................... 73 Program 3 (geographic): Kisangani supply area .......................................................................................... 79 Program 4: Engaging Private Sector in REDD+ ............................................................................................. 85 Program 5 (cross cutting): Small grants ....................................................................................................... 91 APPENDIX 2: STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION ............................................................................................... 97 APPENDIX 3: DEDICATED GRANT MECHANISM FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES ...... 105 APPENDIX 4: TIMELINE FOR THE REDD PROCESS ELEMENTS ESSENTIAL TO THE FIP ..................................... 107 APPENDIX 5: PRIORITY AREAS SELECTION MATRIX FOR THE FIP ................................................................... 108 APPENDIX 6: SUMMARY TABLE OF POTENTIAL RISKS ................................................................................... 109 APPENDIX 7: TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT ........ 112 APPENDIX 8: STRATEGY FOR PRIVATE SECTOR INVOLVEMENT ..................................................................... 124 APPENDIX 9: EVALUATION BY THE EXPERT FROM THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY PANEL & ANSWERS FROM THE DRC .............................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Actor Heatmap
    2017 Q3 Report CONTENTS 1. Results & Overall Progress 2. Sectors 3. Regions 4. Cross-Cutting Sectors, Operations & Management 5. Business Development Services 6. Markets in Crisis 7. Women’s Economic Empowerment INTRODUCTION The third quarter was another busy one at ELAN RDC, as the programme balanced a mid-term evaluation and data verification process in addition to ongoing implementation. A number of new consultants contributed to increased activity for the technical team during the quarter, resulting in concrete workstreams on business development services (BDS), the launch of scoping to replicate existing interventions in conflict-affected Kasai Central, and a renewed focus on gender through increased support from our senior gender adviser. A number of large partnerships were finalised thanks to agreement with DFID on an improved non-objection review process, however, several large partnerships remained delayed due to multiple factors including increasing unstable market conditions. Partnerships in the energy and agriculture sectors were finalised during the quarter, while several partnerships in the financial sector faced delays. The programme has initiated a drive to increase and improve communications of programme results, resulting in an increase in visibility across various media. The launch of the Congo Coffee Atlas, completion of research for The Africa Seed Access Index (TASAI), meeting with mobile network operators to establish a lobbying platform and the finalisation of the contract for a renewable energy marketing campaign are all examples of activities through which ELAN RDC has made more market information available to the broader private sector. More details about third quarter results are found in the following slides.
    [Show full text]
  • IMCK Newsletter 17.3.Pages
    INSTITUT MEDICAL CHRETIEN DU KASAI !1 OFINSTITUT MEDICAL!5 CHRETIEN DU KASAI B.P. 205 KANANGA B.P. 205 KANANGA INSTITUT MEDICAL CHRETIENREPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU DUKASAI CONGO REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO Christian Medical Institute Hôpitalof – theEcole d’infirmiers Kasai – Ecole de laborantins - Serving – Service de santé communautairein Central - Service d’ophtalmologie Congo Service dentaire – Centre d’études et de recyclage Hôpital – Ecole d’infirmiers – Ecole de laborantins – Service de santé communautaire - Service d’ophtalmologie E-mail : [email protected] Service dentaire – Centre d’études et de recyclage B. P. 205 Kananga, Republic Democratic du Congo ; Email: [email protected] E-mail : [email protected] 2. Find a way to channel a greater percentage of donations back into that unpopular category 2. Find a way to channel a greater percentage of donations back into that unpopular category of “undesignated” gifts so that we can have the flexibility to apply them where A Periodic Newsletter operational needs are Issuethe most desperate. No. 41 But ifJanuary you cannot (and - thatMarch is understandable, 2017 of “undesignated” gifts so that we can have the flexibility to apply them whereA considering all the news stories one sees about mismanaged funds), then consider operational needs are the most desperate. But if you cannot (and that is understandable, designating gifts carefully to those things that are at the core of IMCK’s operational considering all the news stories one sees about mismanaged funds), then consider The current conflict in the Kasai has needs.I askedFor example the new: Specify IMCK money Administrator, for medicines and Kastin medical Katawa, supplies; Specifyto describe money designating gifts carefully to those things that are at the core of IMCK’s operational added new suffering and danger.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Generale
    P a g e | 1 INTRODUCTION GENERALE 0.1. Problématique Le présent mémoire porte sur les logotypes et la signification : Analyse de la dénotation et de la connotation des logotypes des banques Trust Merchant Bank (TMB) et Rawbank. En effet, Sperber1 dit qu’il n’y a rien de plus banal que la communication, car les êtres humains sont par nature des êtres communiquant par la parole, le geste, l’écrit, l’habillement et voire le silence, etc. La célèbre école de Palo Alto le dit tout haut aussi: on ne peut pas ne pas communiquer, tout est communication2. La communication, nous la pratiquons tous les jours sans y penser (mais également en y pensant) et généralement avec un succès assez impressionnant, même si parfois nous sommes confrontés à ses limites et à ses échecs. La communication demeure l’élément fondamental et complexe de la vie sociale qui rend possible l’interaction des personnes et dont la caractéristique essentielle est, selon Daniel Lagache3, la réciprocité. Elle est ce par quoi une personne influence une autre et en est influencée, car elle n’est pas indépendante des effets de son action. Morin affirme même que la communication a plusieurs fonctions : l’information, la connaissance, l’explication et la compréhension. Toutefois, pour lui, le problème central dans la communication humaine est celui de la compréhension, car on communique pour comprendre et se comprendre4. Raison pour laquelle, les chercheurs en matière de communication, surtout de notre ère, époque marquée par l’accroissement des entreprises dans la plupart des secteurs de la vie sociale, se trouvent confronté à de nouvelles problématiques qui sont autant d’enjeux pour améliorer la communication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation
    The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation Lead Authors:∗ Tamara Gurevich and Peter Herman Contributing Authors: Nabil Abbyad, Meryem Demirkaya, Austin Drenski, Jeffrey Horowitz, and Grace Kenneally Version 1.00 Abstract This document provides technical documentation for the Dynamic Gravity dataset. The Dynamic Gravity dataset provides extensive country and country pair information for a total of 285 countries and territories, annually, between the years 1948 to 2016. This documentation extensively describes the methodology used for the creation of each variable and the information sources they are based on. Additionally, it provides a large collection of summary statistics to aid in the understanding of the resulting Dynamic Gravity dataset. This documentation is the result of ongoing professional research of USITC Staff and is solely meant to represent the opinions and professional research of individual authors. It is not meant to represent in any way the views of the U.S. International Trade Commission or any of its individual Commissioners. It is circulated to promote the active exchange of ideas between USITC Staff and recognized experts outside the USITC, professional devel- opment of Office Staff and increase data transparency by encouraging outside professional critique of staff research. Please address all correspondence to [email protected] or [email protected]. ∗We thank Renato Barreda, Fernando Gracia, Nuhami Mandefro, and Richard Nugent for research assistance in completion of this project. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Nomenclature . .3 1.2 Variables Included in the Dataset . .3 1.3 Contents of the Documentation . .6 2 Country or Territory and Year Identifiers 6 2.1 Record Identifiers .
    [Show full text]
  • Project for the Supply of Clean Water for the Cederi-Madimba Community Centre
    CEDERI – MADIMBA CENTRE DE DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL INTEGRE PROJECT FOR THE SUPPLY OF CLEAN WATER FOR THE CEDERI-MADIMBA COMMUNITY CENTRE Adresse : Madimba/Cité — B.P. 215 Inkisi — Kongo Central / RD Congo Tél : (+243).99 340 46.56 / 82 215 44 58 E-mail : [email protected] / [email protected] Facebook : ONGD CEDERI-MADIMBA 1 INFORMATION ABOUT THE ORGANISATION NAME: Integrated Rural Development Centre (Centre de Développement Rural Intégré) ‘CEDERI-Madimba’ A.S.B.L./O.N.G. ADDRESS: B.P. 215 Inkisi Territoire de Madimba District de la Lukaya Province du Kongo Central République Démocratique du Congo Tél. : +243.99.34.04.656/82 215 44 58/85.28.58.780 Email : [email protected] / [email protected]/ [email protected] Facebook: ONG CEDERI-MADIMBA LEGAL STATUS: Located in Madimba, 100km from Kinshasa, capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo, on National Road N° 1 (Kinshasa-Matadi), the Integrated Rural Development Centre (CEDERI-MADIMBA) is a non-profit association and a non-governmental organisation (NGO). It was created on 12 September 1990 and its bylaws were certified in 1995. GENERAL AIM: The CEDERI aims to improve the socio-economic situation of the rural area with the active participation of the affected population who are the direct beneficiaries. It carries out activities in Madimba and Kasangulu territories in particular. SPECIFIC GOALS: − To train and support rural communities in their activities; − To promote family enterprises in grassroots rural communities; − To promote health activities (preventative and curative medicine); − To fight against poverty in the rural population; − To fight against desertification and deforestation by reforestation and conservation activities in the community’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTIVE USG PROGRAMS for the DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC of the CONGO RESPONSE Last Updated 07/27/20
    ACTIVE USG PROGRAMS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO RESPONSE Last Updated 07/27/20 BAS-UELE HAUT-UELE ITURI S O U T H S U D A N COUNTRYWIDE NORTH KIVU OCHA IMA World Health Samaritan’s Purse AIRD Internews CARE C.A.R. Samaritan’s Purse Samaritan’s Purse IMA World Health IOM UNHAS CAMEROON DCA ACTED WFP INSO Medair FHI 360 UNICEF Samaritan’s Purse Mercy Corps IMA World Health NRC NORD-UBANGI IMC UNICEF Gbadolite Oxfam ACTED INSO NORD-UBANGI Samaritan’s WFP WFP Gemena BAS-UELE Internews HAUT-UELE Purse ICRC Buta SCF IOM SUD-UBANGI SUD-UBANGI UNHAS MONGALA Isiro Tearfund IRC WFP Lisala ACF Medair UNHCR MONGALA ITURI U Bunia Mercy Corps Mercy Corps IMA World Health G A EQUATEUR Samaritan’s NRC EQUATEUR Kisangani N Purse WFP D WFPaa Oxfam Boende A REPUBLIC OF Mbandaka TSHOPO Samaritan’s ATLANTIC NORTH GABON THE CONGO TSHUAPA Purse TSHOPO KIVU Lake OCEAN Tearfund IMA World Health Goma Victoria Inongo WHH Samaritan’s Purse RWANDA Mercy Corps BURUNDI Samaritan’s Purse MAI-NDOMBE Kindu Bukavu Samaritan’s Purse PROGRAM KEY KINSHASA SOUTH MANIEMA SANKURU MANIEMA KIVU WFP USAID/BHA Non-Food Assistance* WFP ACTED USAID/BHA Food Assistance** SA ! A IMA World Health TA N Z A N I A Kinshasa SH State/PRM KIN KASAÏ Lusambo KWILU Oxfam Kenge TANGANYIKA Agriculture and Food Security KONGO CENTRAL Kananga ACTED CRS Cash Transfers For Food Matadi LOMAMI Kalemie KASAÏ- Kabinda WFP Concern Economic Recovery and Market Tshikapa ORIENTAL Systems KWANGO Mbuji T IMA World Health KWANGO Mayi TANGANYIKA a KASAÏ- n Food Vouchers g WFP a n IMC CENTRAL y i k
    [Show full text]
  • The Itombwe Massif, Democratic Republic of Congo: Biological Surveys and Conservation, with an Emphasis on Grauer's Gorilla and Birds Endemic to the Albertine Rift
    Oryx Voi 33 No 4 October -.939 The Itombwe Massif, Democratic Republic of Congo: biological surveys and conservation, with an emphasis on Grauer's gorilla and birds endemic to the Albertine Rift llambu Omari, John A. Hart, Thomas M. Butynski, N. R. Birhashirwa, Agenonga Upoki, Yuma M'Keyo, Faustin Bengana, Mugunda Bashonga and Norbert Bagurubumwe Abstract In 1996, the first major biological surveys in species were recorded during the surveys, including the the Itombwe Massif in over 30 years revealed that sig- Congo bay owl Phodilus prigoginei, which was previously nificant areas of natural habitat and remnant faunal known from a single specimen collected in Itombwe populations remain, but that these are subject to ongo- nearly 50 years ago. No part of Itombwe is officially ing degradation and over-exploitation. At least 10 areas protected and conservation initiatives are needed ur- of gorilla Gorilla gorilla graueri occurrence, including gently. Given the remoteness and continuing political eight of 17 areas identified during the first survey of the instability of the region, conservation initiatives must species in the massif in 1959, were found. Seventy-nine collaborate with traditional authorities based in the gorilla nest sites were recorded and at least 860 gorillas massif, and should focus at the outset on protecting the were estimated to occupy the massif. Fifty-six species of gorillas and limiting further degradation of key areas. mammals were recorded. Itombwe supports the highest representation, of any area, of bird species endemic to Keywords Afromontane forests, Albertine Rift, Demo- the Albertine Rift highlands. Twenty-two of these cratic Republic of Congo, endemic avifauna, gorillas.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministere Du Developpement Rural La Republique Democratique Du Congo
    MINISTERE DU DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL LA REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO L'ETUDE SUR LE PLAN DE DEVELOPPEMENT COMMUNAUTAIRE DU DISTRICT DE CATARACTES DANS LA PROVINCE DU BAS-CONGO EN REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO RAPPORT FINAL JANVIER 2010 AGENCE JAPONAISE DE COOPERATION INTERNATIONALE NTC INTERNATINAL CO., LTD. PREFACE En réponse à la demande du gouvernement de la République démocratique du Congo, le gouvernement du Japon a décidé de mener une étude sur le Plan de Développement Communautaire du District de Cataractes dans la Province du Bas-Congo et a confié l'étude à l’Agence Japonaise de Coopération Internationale (JICA). La JICA a sélectionné et dépêché une équipe d'étude dirigée par M. Akira Iwamoto de la firme NTC International Co., Ltd entre Juillet 2008 et Décembre 2009. L'équipe a eu des entretiens avec les autorités concernées du gouvernement de la République démocratique du Congo et a mené des enquêtes de terrain dans la zone d'étude. À son retour au Japon, l'équipe a mené de nouvelles études et préparé le présent rapport final J'espère que ce rapport contribuera à l'amélioration des relations amicales entre nos deux pays. Enfin, je tiens à exprimer ma sincère gratitude aux autorités concernées du gouvernement de la République démocratique du Congo pour leur étroite collaboration étendue à l'étude. janvier 2010 Kiyofumi Konishi, Directeur Général Département des Infrastructures Economiques Agence Japonaise de Coopération Internationale Lettre de transmission Monsieur Kiyofumi Konishi Directeur du service des infrastructures économiques Agence japonaise de coopération internationale Monsieur le Directeur, Nous avons l’honneur de vous remettre ci-joint le rapport final de l’Etude sur le plan de développement communautaire du district de Cataractes dans la province du Bas-Congo en République Démocratique du Congo qui vient de s’achever.
    [Show full text]
  • Albertine Rift Nov04
    africa & madagascar "meeting the challenge" Albertine Rift Montane Forests Ecoregion Programme 1. Background Duration: The Albertine Rift Montane Forests Ecoregion is an area of Current phase is 5 exceptional faunal and floral endemism. These afromontane years, from 2001 to forests also support many endangered species such as the 2005. Mountain and Eastern Lowland gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei and G. b. graueri ), which are among the most charismatic Funding Status: flagship species in Africa, and an effective target for much of the Partly funded by WWF- current conservation investment in the area. DK and SE (25%); the remaining is yet to be The mountain chain comprising the Albertine Rift straddles the funded (currently borders of five different nations: Democratic Republic of Congo covered through Direct (over 70% of the Ecoregion), Uganda (20%), Rwanda (6%), Burundi Cost Recovery). (3%) and Tanzania (1%). Executing Agency: The Albertine Rift has been identified by all key international WWF Eastern Africa conservation NGOs as a top priority area for biodiversity Regional Programme conservation in Africa and the Ecoregion is a priority Ecoregion for Office (WWF EARPO). WWF-International. 2. Goal and Objectives The Goal of the Albertine Rift Ecoregion Programme is to ensure the long-term conservation of the Albertine Rift Montane Forests and other important interconnected ecosystems. The objectives are: ? To develop a strategic framework for conservation efforts in the ecoregion with a wide variety of stakeholders ? To implement and co-ordinate a set of comprehensive and inter-related field projects in the Albertine Rift ? To support national authorities in the planning and management of protected areas and buffer zones 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Virunga Landscape
    23. Virunga Landscape Th e Landscape in brief Coordinates: 1°1’29’’N – 1°44’21’’S – 28°56’11’’E – 30°5’2’’E. Area: 15,155 km2 Elevation: 680–5,119 m Terrestrial ecoregions: Ecoregion of the Afroalpine barrens of Ruwenzori-Virunga Ecoregion of the Afromontane forests of the Albertine Rift Ecoregion of the forest-savannah mosaic of Lake Victoria Aquatic ecoregions: Mountains of the Albertine Rift Lakes Kivu, Edward, George and Victoria Protected areas: Virunga National Park, DRC, 772,700 ha, 1925 Volcans National Park, Rwanda, 16,000 ha, 1925 Rutshuru Hunting Domain, 64,200 ha, 1946 added Bwindi-Impenetrable National Park situ- ated a short distance away from the volcanoes in southwest Uganda. Th is complex functions as a single ecosystem and many animals move across the borders, which permits restoration of the populations1. Physical environment Relief and altitude Th e Landscape is focused on the central trough of the Albertine Rift, occupied by Lake Figure 23.1. Map of Virunga Landscape (Sources: CARPE, Edward (916 m, 2,240 km²), and vast plains DFGFI, JRC, SRTM, WWF-EARPO). at an altitude of between 680 and 1,450 m. Its western edge stretches along the eastern bluff of Location and area the Mitumba Mountain Range forming the west- ern ridge of the rift. In the northeast, it includes he Virunga Landscape covers 15,155 km² the western bluff of the Ruwenzori horst (fault Tand includes two contiguous national parks, block) with its active glaciers, whose peak reaches Virunga National Park in DRC and Volcans a height of 5,119 m and whose very steep relief National Park in Rwanda, the Rutshuru Hunting comprises numerous old glacial valleys (Figure Zone and a 10 km-wide strip at the edge of the 23.2).
    [Show full text]
  • Isangi Redd+ Vcs-Ccb Project Description Summary
    ISANGI REDD+ VCS-CCB PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Document prepared by: Project Name Isangi REDD+ Project Project Location Isangi territory, Yangambi District, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo Project Proponent Jadora, LLC. Contact: Donald Tuttle, CEO, +1 425 614-6191, [email protected] Document Prepared By Ecological Carbon Offsets Partners, LLC (ecoPartners) Auditor Rainforest Alliance. Contact: Janice O’Brien, +1-647-899-7214, [email protected] Project Start Date 01 – August – 2009 GHG accounting period and lifetime Starting 01 – August – 2009 and ending 31 – July – 2039 Project Implementation Period and August 1, 2009 – December 31, 2013 GHG Monitoring Period Validation Seeking full validation CCB Status History Undergoing Initial Validation and Verification CCB Standards Edition Used Climate, Community and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards, Second Edition, December 2008 CCB Benefits Summary The project seeks to address the issue of deforestation in the DRC on a local level, protecting the climate and biodiversity by maintaining and enhancing this tract of rainforest while enhancing the quality of life of the local communities through sustainable agriculture and economic development TODO Update this field Gold Level Criteria Biodiversity – The project will protect endangered and vulnerable floral species through forest conservation. Date of PD Completion 3/15/14 PD Version Number V1.3 (subject to change) Expected Verification Schedule April 17-25, 2014 1 CLIMATE, COMMUNITY AND BIODIVERSITY SUMMARY 1.1 Original Conditions
    [Show full text]
  • International Gorilla Conservation Programme Greater Virunga Transboundary Collaboration
    International Gorilla Conservation Programme Greater Virunga Transboundary Collaboration Anna Behm Masozera Email: [email protected] Phone: +250 782332280 (voice messages can be left at +1 802 999 4958) www.greatervirunga.org www.igcp.org Central Albertine Rift: Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, and Uganda. Size: Mountain gorilla habitat = 796.4 km2 Protected Areas in the Greater Virunga Landscape = 11,826.7 km2 Page 1 of 6 Participants in coordinating the ongoing transboundary cooperation: National Government: • Ministry of Environment Nature Conservation, and Tourism (DRC) • Ministry of Trade and Industry (Rwanda) • Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities (Uganda) Local Government: • North Kivu Province and Orientale Province (DRC) • many Districts (Uganda and Rwanda) Protected area administration: • Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (DRC) • Rwanda Development Board (Rwanda) • Uganda Wildlife Authority (Uganda) International NGOs: • Wildlife Conservation Society • WWF • International Gorilla Conservation Programme (coalition of Fauna & Flora International and WWF) • Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project/Gorilla Doctors, • Diane Fossey Gorilla Fund International Objectives: 1) To promote and coordinate conservation of biodiversity and related socio-cultural values within the Greater Virunga protected area network; 2) To develop strategies for collaborative management of biodiversity; 3) To promote and ensure coordinated planning, monitoring, and evaluation of implementation of transboundary conservation and development
    [Show full text]