Informe Del Sr. Doudou Diène, Relator Especial Sobre Las Formas Contemporáneas De Racismo, Discriminación Racial, Xenofobia Y Formas Conexas De Intolerancia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Informe Del Sr. Doudou Diène, Relator Especial Sobre Las Formas Contemporáneas De Racismo, Discriminación Racial, Xenofobia Y Formas Conexas De Intolerancia NACIONES UNIDAS E Distr. Consejo Económico GENERAL y Social E/CN.4/2004/18/Add.1 8 de enero 2004 ESPAÑOL Original: FRANCÉS/INGLÉS COMISIÓN DE DERECHOS HUMANOS 60º período de sesiones Tema 6 del programa provisional EL RACISMO, LA DISCRIMINACIÓN RACIAL, LA XENOFOBIA Y TODAS LAS FORMAS DE DISCRIMINACIÓN Informe del Sr. Doudou Diène, Relator Especial sobre las formas contemporáneas de racismo, discriminación racial, xenofobia y formas conexas de intolerancia Adición* MISIÓN A GUYANA Y TRINIDAD Y TOBAGO Resumen El Relator Especial realizó una misión regional a Guyana y Trinidad y Tabago del 14 al 25 de julio de 2003. La misión tenía principalmente por objeto examinar, en el contexto de una sensibilización de las Naciones Unidas sobre la urgencia de la situación en Guyana, el estado de las relaciones interraciales, ilustrado en especial por la gravedad de las tensiones entre las comunidades indo y afroguyanesas que provocaron violencias políticas durante las elecciones parlamentarias y presidenciales entre marzo de 2001 y julio de 2002. En este sentido y con una perspectiva de comparación que tiene en cuenta tanto la semejanza del pasado histórico -esclavista y colonial- como la composición sociodemográfica de Guyana y Trinidad y Tabago, el Relator Especial consideró conveniente trasladarse también a Trinidad y Tabago. El Relator Especial considera que su misión se inscribe también en el marco de la doble estrategia que ha concebido para aumentar la efectividad de su mandato. Inspirándose en el espíritu y la letra de la * El resumen del presente informe se distribuye en todos los idiomas oficiales. El informe figura en el anexo del resumen y se reproduce en el idioma en que se presentó y en inglés. Los apéndices se distribuyen en inglés únicamente. GE.04-10127 (S) 280104 220304 E/CN.4/2004/18/Add.1 página 2 Declaración y del Programa de Acción de Durban, y con la intención de aportar respuestas duraderas y en profundidad al racismo, la estrategia está dirigida no sólo a ampliar y reafirmar las respuestas jurídicas y políticas al racismo, la discriminación racial, la xenofobia y la intolerancia que le son conexas, sino también a promover una mejor comprensión de las causas profundas, fundamentos, procesos y mecanismos, ideológicos, culturales y mentales mediante los cuales se perpetúan y renuevan la cultura y la mentalidad racistas y discriminatorias. El Relator Especial elabora en consecuencia un enfoque gracias al cual, en las sociedades multiétnicas de hecho, la lucha contra la discriminación racial debe ir unida a la construcción a largo plazo de una sociedad pluralista auténtica, a la vez respetuosa de las especificidades de las diferentes comunidades y deseosa de promover sus interacciones y su unidad. En Guyana, el Relator Especial ha comprobado la realidad profunda de la polarización étnica entre guyaneses de origen africano, indio y amerindio. Esta polarización, que encuentra su expresión más radical en la estructuración con predominancia étnica de los partidos políticos, se reproduce en la estructura del aparato del Estado, especialmente en el sector público, el ejército y la policía, y tiene un efecto profundo y duradero en los planos económico, social y cultural. Los distintos bloqueos, humanos, psicológicos, relacionales y culturales, generados por esta polarización no sólo han contaminado todas las capas y modalidades de la "convivencia" sino también han ahondado y reafirmado un estado de subdesarrollo económico y social perjudicial al conjunto de la población de un país que, no obstante, posee considerables recursos naturales, humanos e intelectuales. El Relator Especial comprobó, pese a todo, que esta polarización ha producido en todas las comunidades, y a todos los niveles, no sólo un sentimiento de odio entre las comunidades sino también una cultura de temor y desconfianza presente en todos los actos de la vida social. Ha comprobado asimismo a lo largo de sus encuentros y conversaciones, y a todos los niveles de la sociedad, la existencia de un sentimiento de pertenencia (a sense of belonging). La sociedad guyanesa es por tanto portadora, a nivel fundamental, de los sentimientos profundos de su pueblo, de los valores humanos necesarios para superar la polarización étnica y construir colectivamente un pluralismo auténtico a través del cual un equilibrio dinámico y creador podría permitir el reconocimiento, el respeto, la protección y la promoción de las especificidades culturales y espirituales y al mismo tiempo la promoción de los valores universales que son consecuencias de las fecundaciones cruzadas entre comunidades. Pero la condición necesaria para esta evolución reside, en último análisis, en la voluntad política de todos los dirigentes del país. La historia de Guyana es, de manera profundamente preocupante, el relato de la instrumentalización política del factor étnico por todos sus dirigentes políticos, cualesquiera que sean las tendencias ideológicas. La identidad del gueto se sustituye, como último instrumento de poder, a la ideología progresista y unitaria inicial de los padres fundadores de la nación guyanesa, Cheddi Jagan y Forbes Burnham, cuya ruptura y prácticas políticas consecutivas se encuentran en el origen de la dinámica infernal de polarización étnica. Pese a su contribución histórica innegable a la liberación y construcción de la nación guyanesa, y en la realidad del conjunto caribeño, el fracaso de esos padres fundadores es no haber sido capaces de sentar, a largo plazo, los fundamentos de una nación unida, igualitaria y democrática. Esta instrumentalización de la etnicidad, alimentada y a veces favorecida por los pensadores ideológicos de la guerra fría y las estrategias imperiales y regionales, se ha convertido literalmente en una cultura política de rapiña, cuyo objetivo último es únicamente la conquista y conservación del poder. La violencia política y social, con sus connotaciones étnicas, ha constituido, en este contexto, uno de los principales factores de inseguridad social e igualmente emocional y mental. La polarización étnica de las principales instituciones responsables de la ley y el orden, la policía y el ejército, constituye un importante factor en la agravación del clima de inseguridad profundamente vivido por todas las comunidades. El pueblo guyanés, cualquiera que sea la comunidad a la que pertenezca, se encuentra profunda y perdurablemente de rodillas en cuanto hace a la seguridad de su vida cotidiana, su estabilidad social, su equilibrio E/CN.4/2004/18/Add.1 página 3 emocional y su desarrollo económico, y tiene una conciencia aguda de encontrase en la situación de víctima emblemática de prácticas políticas realizadas en su nombre. El Relator Especial se ha visto llevado, en consecuencia, a evaluar, a través de estas conversaciones, las dimensiones de un sentimiento profundo de "cansancio" moral, emocional y político a todos los niveles de la sociedad guyanesa, frente a las consecuencias individuales y colectivas de la polarización étnica. Por lo demás, el Relator Especial ha observado con grandes esperanzas que su visita ha coincidido precisamente con la instauración de un nuevo clima político que por su naturaleza puede cortar, en profundidad, esta dinámica destructora. Las autoridades guyanesas, en especial el Presidente de la República y los dirigentes de la oposición, entre ellos el jefe del principal partido de la oposición, comunicaron al Relator Especial su voluntad de acabar con esta herencia mediante reformas políticas consensuales con la idea de establecer las bases de una colaboración democrática entre el Gobierno y la oposición para transformar, por fin, a la supervivencia, el bienestar y la "convivencia" del pueblo guyanés en el elemento central de la práctica política. Un comunicado firmado conjuntamente por el Presidente Jagdeo y el jefe de la oposición, Sr. Corbin, el 6 de mayo de 2003, constituye a este respecto la expresión solemne del necesario compromiso político, al más alto nivel, para garantizar el funcionamiento de la democracia, la paz y el desarrollo en Guyana. Por lo que hace a Trinidad y Tabago, el Relator Especial considera que pese a haber heredado la misma población multiétnica y una sociedad resquebrajada por el enfrentamiento entre comunidades y la discriminación racial, la polarización étnica es, comparada con Guyana, menor en este país. Al terminar su visita a Trinidad y Tabago, el Relator Especial desearía subrayar el papel capital que desempeña el diálogo interreligioso en las situaciones de tensión interétnica y de construcciones identitarias de guetos marcadas por la imbricación de la raza, la cultura y la religión. Los dirigentes de las principales religiones y tradiciones espirituales de este país han aprendido muy pronto la importancia de los peligros de la polarización étnica y encendido el contrafuego de la promoción de sus interacciones y de la proximidad de su mensaje espiritual, mediante encuentros personales y la participación recíproca en sus respectivas ceremonias litúrgicas así como mediante declaraciones conjuntas sobre las grandes cuestiones sociales del país. Estos dirigentes religiosos han sacado a la luz, en último análisis, una notable pedagogía de la "convivencia" poniendo en práctica la primera acepción de la palabra "religión": unir y no disociar. De ello resulta que, pese a las similaridades históricas, demográficas y en ciertos aspectos políticas entre Guyana y Trinidad y Tabago, este último país se sitúa, por lo que hace a interacciones individuales y prácticas religiosas, en una dinámica multicultural cierta.
Recommended publications
  • India's Domestic Political Setting
    Updated July 12, 2021 India’s Domestic Political Setting Overview The BJP and Congress are India’s only genuinely national India, the world’s most populous democracy, is, according parties. In previous recent national elections they together to its Constitution, a “sovereign, socialist, secular, won roughly half of all votes cast, but in 2019 the BJP democratic republic” where the bulk of executive power boosted its share to nearly 38% of the estimated 600 million rests with the prime minister and his Council of Ministers votes cast (to Congress’s 20%; turnout was a record 67%). (the Indian president is a ceremonial chief of state with The influence of regional and caste-based (and often limited executive powers). Since its 1947 independence, “family-run”) parties—although blunted by two most of India’s 14 prime ministers have come from the consecutive BJP majority victories—remains a crucial country’s Hindi-speaking northern regions, and all but 3 variable in Indian politics. Such parties now hold one-third have been upper-caste Hindus. The 543-seat Lok Sabha of all Lok Sabha seats. In 2019, more than 8,000 candidates (House of the People) is the locus of national power, with and hundreds of parties vied for parliament seats; 33 of directly elected representatives from each of the country’s those parties won at least one seat. The seven parties listed 28 states and 8 union territories. The president has the below account for 84% of Lok Sabha seats. The BJP’s power to dissolve this body. A smaller upper house of a economic reform agenda can be impeded in the Rajya maximum 250 seats, the Rajya Sabha (Council of States), Sabha, where opposition parties can align to block certain may review, but not veto, revenue legislation, and has no nonrevenue legislation (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Guyana: an Overview
    Updated March 10, 2020 Guyana: An Overview Located on the north coast of South America, English- system from independence until the early 1990s; the party speaking Guyana has characteristics common of a traditionally has had an Afro-Guyanese base of support. In Caribbean nation because of its British colonial heritage— contrast, the AFC identifies as a multiracial party. the country achieved independence from Britain in 1966. Guyana participates in Caribbean regional organizations The opposition People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C), and forums, and its capital of Georgetown serves as led by former President Bharrat Jagdeo (1999-2011), has 32 headquarters for the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), a seats in the National Assembly. Traditionally supported by regional integration organization. Indo-Guyanese, the PPP/C governed Guyana from 1992 until its defeat in the 2015 elections. Current congressional interest in Guyana is focused on the conduct of the March 2, 2020, elections. Some Members of Congress have expressed deep concern about allegations of Guyana at a Glance potential electoral fraud and have called on the Guyana Population: 782,000 (2018, IMF est.) Elections Commission (GECOM) to not declare a winner Ethnic groups: Indo-Guyanese, or those of East Indian until the completion of a credible vote tabulation process. heritage, almost 40%; Afro-Guyanese, almost 30%; mixed, 20%; Amerindian, almost 11% (2012, CIA est.) Figure 1. Map of Guyana Area: 83,000 square miles, about the size of Idaho GDP: $3.9 billion (current prices, 2018, IMF est.) Real GDP Growth: 4.1% (2018 est.); 4.4% (2019 est.) (IMF) Per Capita GDP: $4,984 (2018, IMF est.) Life Expectancy: 69.6 years (2017, WB) Sources: International Monetary Fund (IMF); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); World Bank (WB).
    [Show full text]
  • India Guyana Bilateral Relation
    India-Guyana Bilateral Relations During the colonial period, Guyana's economy was focused on plantation agriculture, which initially depended on slave labour. Guyana saw major slave rebellions in 1763 and again in 1823.Great Britain passed the Slavery Abolition Act in British Parliament that abolished slavery in most British colonies, freeing more than 800,000 enslaved Africans in the Caribbean and South Africa. British Guiana became a Crown colony in 1928, and in 1953 it was granted home rule. In 1950, Mr. Cheddi Jagan, who was Indian-Guyanese, and Mr. Forbes Burnham, who was Afro-Guyanese, created the colony's first political party, the Progressive People's Party (PPP), which was dedicated to gaining the colony's independence. In the 1953 elections, Mr. Cheddi Jagan was elected chief minister. Mr. Cheddi Jagan of the PPP and Mr. Forbes Burnham of the PNC were to dominate Guyana politics for decades to come. In 1961, Britain granted the colony autonomy, and Mr. Cheddi Jagan became Prime Minister (1961–1964). In 1964, Burnham succeeded Jagan as Prime Minister, a position he retained after the country gained full independence on May 26, 1966. With independence, the country returned to its traditional name, Guyana. Mr. Burnham ruled Guyana until his death in 1985 (from 1980 to 1985, after a change in the constitution, he served as president). Mr. Desmond Hoyte of the PNC became president in 1985, but in 1992 the PPP reemerged, winning a majority in the general election. Mr. Cheddi Jagan became President, and succeeded in reviving the economy. After his death in 1997, his wife, Janet Jagan, was elected President.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 54 WHEREAS President
    • NINTH PARLIAMENT OF GUYNA FIRST SESSION (2006-2008) NATIONAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 54 WHEREAS President Bharrat Jagdeo met on February 19 and 20 with a broad cross-section of representatives from the religious community, business sector, the labour io movement, women, Amerindian, and other civil society bodies to discuss the recent escalation of crime, and from that engagement a joint statement was issued which called for: "1. Commit their full and unqualified support of the joint services in confronting crime in our country and in securing the safety of our citizens under the law, and; 2. Work in collaboration with the Government and all of the parliamentary political parties to jointly review the national security plan for its urgent and comprehensive implementation with the ultimate goal of cementing inclusive democracy, peace and justice in our country; 3. Initiate and support confidence building measures in the society at large 4. and amongst communities and organizations, in order to continue to move the country forward; 4. Call on all political parties to seek in good faith a unified position on law and order and public safety." (A copy attached at Appendix A); /...2 AND WHEREAS President Jagdeo also met on February 19 with the leaders of the five parliamentary political parties to discuss the current crime situation, and following that meeting a joint statement was issued calling for: "1. Unequivocally condemn crime in all its forms especially the recent Lusignan and Bartica massacres; 2. Commit to work together in support of the Joint Services as they fight crime professionally and within the confines of the law; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribute for Janet Jagan
    Speech for the late Janet Jagan former President of Guyana at York College. Members of the head table, consul general of Guyana, Mr.Evans, ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. We are gathered here today to pay tribute to a great lady, a lady whom I protected while she served as Prime Minister and President of Guyana. I was honored as a member of the Presidential Guards to serve in this capacity. I was selected to join the Presidential Guards after Comrade Cheddi Jagan became President in 1992 and served as one his Bodyguards until his passing in 1997. The P.P.P won a landslide victory at the polls and he became the new president of Guyana, his wife Janet, became first lady. Prime Minister Samuel Hinds was sworn in as president, Janet Jagan became prime minister, after a year, elections were held and Janet won the Presidency. Comrades here in the Diaspora I don't want you to forget as soon as Cheddi was declared winner all hell broke loose, it was former President Jimmy Carter who saved the day. During this time, I witnessed the caring, compassionate and fearlessness of this great woman, Janet Jagan. Every morning before we left for the office of the President, she would give me a bag with President Cheddi's breakfast. She would then drive to the New Guyana Company, home of the Mirror Newspaper, without Bodyguards. As First Lady, she rarely traveled around with president Cheddi, she never liked the spotlight. However, she would accompany comrade Cheddi and the grandchildren, whom she loved dearly to the swimming pool, a car was sent to pick up Kellawan Lall's and Gail Texeira's and many other kids to go along with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/24/2021 04:10:37AM Via Free Access 2 Pires, Strange and Mello Several Afro- and Indo-Guianese Populations
    New West Indian Guide 92 (2018) 1–34 nwig brill.com/nwig The Bakru Speaks Money-Making Demons and Racial Stereotypes in Guyana and Suriname* Rogério Brittes W. Pires Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil [email protected] Stuart Earle Strange Yale-NUS College, Singapore [email protected] Marcelo Moura Mello Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil [email protected] Abstract Throughout the Guianas, people of all ethnicities fear one particular kind of demonic spirit. Called baccoo in Guyana, bakru in coastal Suriname, and bakulu or bakuu among Saamaka and Ndyuka Maroons in the interior, these demons offer personal wealth in exchange for human life. Based on multisited ethnography in Guyana and Suriname, this paper analyzes converging and diverging conceptions of the “same” spirit among * Most of the research for this article was carried out by the authors during fieldwork for their Ph.D. dissertation.The research was financed byThe National Science Foundation,The Social Science Research Council, The Wenner Gren Foundation, and the University of Michigan’s Department of Anthropology (Stuart Strange); by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Museu Nacional’s Graduate Program in Social Anthro- pology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (ufrj) (Marcelo Mello and Rogério Pires); and by a CNPq postdoctoral scholarship in the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Rogério Pires). Previous versions of this article were presented twice in 2015 and once in 2017: in a seminar at Museu Nacional/ufrj, in a panel session at the American Anthropological Asso- ciation (aaa) meeting, and in a lecture at Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (ufjf).
    [Show full text]
  • 20190430, Unrevised Senate Debate
    1 Leave of Absence 2019.04.30 SENATE Tuesday, April 30, 2019 The Senate met at 1.30 p.m. PRAYERS [MADAM PRESIDENT in the Chair] LEAVE OF ABSENCE Madam President: Hon. Senators, I have granted leave of absence to Sen. The Hon. Dennis Moses, Sen. The Hon. Paula Gopee-Scoon and Sen. Avinash Singh, all of whom are out of the country. SENATORS’ APPOINTMENT Madam President: Hon. Senators, I have received the following communication from Her Excellency The President, Paula-Mae Weekes, ORTT: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO By Her Excellency PAULA-MAE WEEKES, O.R.T.T., President of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. /s/ Paula-Mae Weekes President. TO: MR. HARVEY BORRIS WHEREAS Senator Dennis Moses is incapable of performing his duties as a Senator by reason of his absence from Trinidad and Tobago: UNREVISED 2 Senators’ Appointment (cont’d) 2019.04.30 NOW, THEREFORE, I, PAULA-MAE WEEKES, President as aforesaid, acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister, in exercise of the power vested in me by section 44(1)(a) and section 44(4)(a) of the Constitution of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, do hereby appoint you, HARVEY BORRIS, to be temporarily a member of the Senate, with effect from 30th April, 2019 and continuing during the absence from Trinidad and Tobago of the said Senator Dennis Moses. Given under my Hand and the Seal of the President of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago at the Office of the President, St.
    [Show full text]
  • 20010629, House Debates
    29 Ombudsman Report Friday, June 29, 2001 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Friday, June 29, 2001 The House met at 1.30 p.m. PRAYERS [MR. SPEAKER in the Chair] OMBUDSMAN REPORT (TWENTY-THIRD) Mr. Speaker: Hon. Members, I have received the 23rd Annual Report of the Ombudsman for the period January 01, 2000—December 31, 2000. The report is laid on the table of the House. CONDOLENCES (Mr. Tahir Kassim Ali) Mr. Speaker: Hon. Members, it is disheartening that I announce the passing of a former representative of this honourable House, Mr. Tahir Kassim Ali. I wish to extend condolences to the bereaved family. Members of both sides of the House may wish to offer condolences to the family. The Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs (Hon. Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj): Mr. Speaker, the deceased, Mr. Tahir Ali served this Parliament from the period 1971—1976. He was the elected Member of Parliament for Couva. He resided in the constituency of Couva South. In addition to being a Member of Parliament, he was also a Councillor for the Couva electoral district in the Caroni County Council for the period 1968—1971. He served as Member of Parliament and Councillor as a member of the People’s National Movement. In 1974 he deputized for the hon. Shamshuddin Mohammed, now deceased, as Minister of Public Utilities for a period of time. In 1991, Mr. Tahir Ali assisted the United National Congress in the constituency of Couva South for the general election of that year. He would be remembered as a person who saw the light and came to the United National Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on The
    Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on the Application filed before the International Court of Justice by the Cooperative of Guyana on March 29th, 2018 ANNEX Table of Contents I. Venezuela’s territorial claim and process of decolonization of the British Guyana, 1961-1965 ................................................................... 3 II. London Conference, December 9th-10th, 1965………………………15 III. Geneva Conference, February 16th-17th, 1966………………………20 IV. Intervention of Minister Iribarren Borges on the Geneva Agreement at the National Congress, March 17th, 1966……………………………25 V. The recognition of Guyana by Venezuela, May 1966 ........................ 37 VI. Mixed Commission, 1966-1970 .......................................................... 41 VII. The Protocol of Port of Spain, 1970-1982 .......................................... 49 VIII. Reactivation of the Geneva Agreement: election of means of settlement by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 1982-198371 IX. The choice of Good Offices, 1983-1989 ............................................. 83 X. The process of Good Offices, 1989-2014 ........................................... 87 XI. Work Plan Proposal: Process of good offices in the border dispute between Guyana and Venezuela, 2013 ............................................. 116 XII. Events leading to the communiqué of the UN Secretary-General of January 30th, 2018 (2014-2018) ....................................................... 118 2 I. Venezuela’s territorial claim and Process of decolonization
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Honorable Pauline Sukhai M.P Minister of Amerindian
    Statement by Honorable Pauline Sukhai M.P Minister of Amerindian Government of Guyana To the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of indigenous People Fifth Session, July 11, 2012 Good Morning Madam Chairperson Guyana strongly believe that the rights to land provides recognition, respect and the support for the of resting and revival of indigenous culture and languages. One conditions for consideration in the titling of lands to Amerindians in Guyana is that of the relationship with the land for sacred, ceremonial and heritage site. In sharing the experiences and efforts that are advanced currently by the Guyana Government: Guyana declared in 1995 the month of September as Amerindian Heritage month, in recognition of the indigenous people as being equal, to ensure the recognition of indigenous peoples as part of our diverse ethnic nation. Annually Amerindians promotes the cultural heritage, achievements and contributions of the people. Highlighted are Amerindians music and arts; Indigenous culinary art; literature and languages. Special recognition are afforded to renowned Amerindians both past and present. Importantly, the Walter Roth museum displays and provides a good perspective on the Amerindian ways of life and displays an array of exhibits and artifacts on Amerindians. In Georgetown our capital city, the Umana Yana (the Benab-the traditional meeting place) and the Amerindian village are constructed strategically and are used for international and local conferences, cultural shows and various diverse events of Guyanese people. Both buildings displays the unique Amerindian architecture style. The Ministry of Amerindian Affairs operates a craft shop and continues to support the sale of indigenous craft, arts, thereby providing a marketing opportunity and promotion of Amerindians craftsmanship.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Operative Republic of Guyana The
    WALTER RODNEY COMMISSION OF INQUIRY CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA THE WALTER RODNEY COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ___________________________________________________ VERBATIM REPORT OF THE PROCEEDINGS ___________________________________________________ Thursday 28th August, 2014 1 WALTER RODNEY COMMISSION OF INQUIRY WALTER RODNEY COMMISSION OF INQUIRY 32nd Hearing 09:42hrs 28th August, 2014 Commissioners: Sir. Richard L. Cheltenham, K.A., Q.C., Ph.D – Chairman Mrs. Jacqueline Samuels-Brown, Q.C. Mr. Seenath Jairam, S.C. Secretary to the Commission: Mrs. Nicola Pierre Counsel to the Commission: Mr. Glenn Hanoman Ms. Latchmie Rahamat Administrator of the Commission Secretariat Mr. Hugh A. Denbow Attorneys for the People’s National Congress (PNC): Mr. Basil Williams Mr. James Bond 2 WALTER RODNEY COMMISSION OF INQUIRY Attorneys for Working People’s Alliance (WPA): Mr. Christopher Ram Mr. Moses Bhagwan - (Absent) Attorneys for the Guyana Trades Union Congress (GTUC): Mr. Brian Clarke - (Absent) Mr. Selwyn Pieters Attorney for Dr. Patricia Rodney, Asha Rodney, Shaka Rodney and Kanini Rodney: Mr. Andrew Pilgrim, Q.C. Attorney for Donald Rodney: Mr. Keith Scotland - (Absent) Ms. Camille Warner Attorneys for the Ex-GDF (Guyana Defence Force) Association: Lt. Col. (Ret‟d) Joseph Harmon - (Absent) Mr. Leslie Sobers - (Absent) Attorney for Captain Gerald Gouveia: Mr. Devindra Kissoon - (Absent) 3 WALTER RODNEY COMMISSION OF INQUIRY Witnesses: Lt. Col. Sydney James Father Malcom Rodrigues Ms. Jocelyn Dow Officers: Ms. Pamela Binda - Editor Mr. Kristoffer Sundar - Assistant Editor Ms. Shanta Kumar - Transcriptionist Ms. Tricia Peters - Transcriptionist Ms. Karen Mohamed - Transcriptionist Ms. Diane Gobin - Transcriptionist Mr. Sahadeo Ramdular - Transcriptionist Ms. Omunike Pearce - Transcriptionist Mr. Vickram Ragobeer - Audio Technician Mr. Mahendranauth Sanichar - Audio Technician Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • By Obianuju Ugwu-Oju CLINOTHEMS of the CRETACEOUS BERBICE
    CLINOTHEMS OF THE CRETACEOUS BERBICE CANYON, OFFSHORE GUYANA by Obianuju Ugwu-Oju A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date ____________________________ Signed ____________________________ Obianuju Ugwu-Oju Signed ____________________________ Dr. Lesli Wood Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date ____________________________ Signed ____________________________ Dr. M. Stephen Enders Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT The Berbice Canyon of offshore Guyana evolved in the late Cretaceous in proximity to a margin that was separating from the African margin in response to the opening of the northern South Atlantic Ocean. The Berbice would be considered a shelf-incised canyon in the nomenclature of Harris and Whiteway, 2011. This study examines the nature of the canyon morphology, fill phases and fill architecture within the Berbice Canyon using ~7000 km2 of 3D seismic time and depth data, as well as chronostratigraphic data from Horseshoe-01 well drilled adjacent to the canyon fill. The Berbice displays composite canyon development with multiple phases of cut and fill. There are six primary incisional surfaces exhibiting a maximum width of 33km, a maximum relief of 1250 m and a composite maximum relief of 2650 m when decompaction is factored. The western side of the canyon system is primarily modified through destructional activities such as scalloping and side wall failures while the eastern side is primarily modified through constructional progradational activities. There are clinothems deposited within the canyon between incisional surfaces I3 and I4, primarily on the eastern side.
    [Show full text]