M&G UK Select Fund
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Parker Review
Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people. -
Finn-Ancial Times Finncap Financials & Insurance Quarterly Sector Note
finn-ancial Times finnCap Financials & Insurance quarterly sector note Q3 2020 | Issue 9 Highlights this quarter: Elevated uncertainty and volatility have been hallmarks of the last 18 months, with Brexit, the UK General Election and more recently COVID-19 all contributing to the challenges that face investors wishing to carve out solid and stable returns amid these ‘unprecedented’ times. With this is mind, and simulating finnCap’s proven Slide Rule methodology, we found the highest quality and lowest value stocks across the financials space, assessing how the make-up of these lists changed over the period January 2019 to July 2020, tracking indexed share price performance over the period as well as movements in P/E and EV/EBIT valuations. The top quartile list of Quality companies outperformed both the Value list and the FTSE All Share by rising +2.5% over the period versus -5.4% for the All Share and -14.3% for Value stocks. Furthermore, the Quality list had protection on the downside in the market crash between February and March 2020, and accelerated faster amid the market rally between late March and July 2020. From high to low (January to March), Quality moved -36.3% against the Value list at -45.5%, while a move off the lows to July was +37.4% for Quality and +34.0% for Value. There was some crossover between the Quality and Value lists, with 7 companies of the top quartile (16 companies in total) appearing in both the Quality and Value lists. This meant that a) investors could capture what we call ‘Quality at Value’ (i.e. -
Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund
Schroder UK Mid Ca p Fund plc Half Year Report and Accounts For the six months ended 31 March 2020 Key messages – Portfolio of “high conviction” stocks aiming to provide a total return in excess of the FTSE 250 (ex-Investment Companies) Index and an attractive level of yield. – Dividend has tripled since 2007 as portfolio investments have captured the cash generative nature of investee companies, in a market where income has become an increasingly important part of our investors’ anticipated returns. – Provides exposure to dynamic mid cap companies that have the potential to grow to be included in the FTSE 100 index, which are at an interesting point in their life cycle, and/or which could ultimately prove to be attractive takeover targets. – Proven research driven investment approach based on the Manager’s investment process allied with a strong selling discipline. – Managed by Andy Brough and Jean Roche with a combined 50 years’ investment experience 1, the fund has a consistent, robust and repeatable investment proces s. 1Andy Brough became Lead Manager on 1 April 2016 . Investment objective Schroder UK Mid Cap Fund plc’s (the “Company”) investment objective is to invest in mid cap equities with the aim of providing a total return in excess of the FTSE 250 (ex -Investment Companies) Index. Investment policy The strategy is to invest principally in the investment universe associated with the benchmark index, but with an element of leeway in investment remit to allow for a conviction-driven approach and an emphasis on specific companies and targeted themes. The Company may also invest in other collective investment vehicles where desirable, for example to provide exposure to specialist areas within the universe. -
Women in Finance Charter List of 273 Signatories
Women in Finance Charter List of 273 signatories 68 new Charter signatories announced on 11 July 2018 Links to gender diversity targets to be published here in September Admiral Group AE3 Media Armstrong Wolfe Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Barrington Hibbert Associates BNP Paribas Personal Finance BondMason Bovill Ltd Bower Recruitment Brooks Macdonald plc Canada Life Coventry Building Society Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd EIS Association Ellis Davies Financial Planning Ltd Engage Financial Services Ltd Equifax Ltd Evolution Financial Planning Fintech Strategic Advisors Ltd Fintellect Recruitment First Wealth LLP Flood Re Ltd Foresight Franklin Templeton Investments GAM Global Processing Services Goji Investments Grant Thornton Hinckley and Rugby Building Society HUBX ICAEW Intermediate Capital Group Investec Asset Management Limited 11 July 2018 11 July 2018 J. P. Morgan Kames Capital plc Lazard & Co Limited Lazard Asset Management Limited LifeSearch Magenta Financial Planning Marsh Ltd Medianett Ltd Mortgages for Businesses Ltd MT Finance Ltd Mustard Seed Impact Ltd National Association of Commercial Finance Brokers Nomura International PIMCO Prytania Solutions Limited Pukka Insure Ltd Rathbone Brothers plc Scottish Equity Partners SDB Bookkeeping Services Semper Capital Management Shepherd Compello Ltd St. James’s Place plc Stonehaven International Sussex Independent Financial Advisers Ltd Tesco Underwriting The British United Provident Association (BUPA) The Meyer Partnership The Mortgage & Insurance Bureau TP -
FTSE UK 100 ESG Select
2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE UK 100 ESG Select Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Constituent Index weight (%) Country Constituent Index weight (%) Country Constituent Index weight (%) Country 3i Group 0.83 UNITED KINGDOM Halfords Group 0.06 UNITED KINGDOM Prudential 2.67 UNITED KINGDOM 888 Holdings 0.08 UNITED KINGDOM Harbour Energy PLC 0.01 UNITED KINGDOM Rathbone Brothers 0.08 UNITED KINGDOM Anglo American 2.62 UNITED KINGDOM Helical 0.03 UNITED KINGDOM Reckitt Benckiser Group 3.01 UNITED KINGDOM Ashmore Group 0.13 UNITED KINGDOM Helios Towers 0.07 UNITED KINGDOM Rio Tinto 4.8 UNITED KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.65 UNITED KINGDOM Hiscox 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM River and Mercantile Group 0.01 UNITED KINGDOM Aviva 1.18 UNITED KINGDOM HSBC Hldgs 6.33 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Dutch Shell A 4.41 UNITED KINGDOM Barclays 2.15 UNITED KINGDOM Imperial Brands 1.09 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Dutch Shell B 3.85 UNITED KINGDOM Barratt Developments 0.52 UNITED KINGDOM Informa 0.56 UNITED KINGDOM Royal Mail 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM BHP Group Plc 3.29 UNITED KINGDOM Intermediate Capital Group 0.44 UNITED KINGDOM Schroders 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM BP 4.66 UNITED KINGDOM International Personal Finance 0.02 UNITED KINGDOM Severn Trent 0.44 UNITED KINGDOM British American Tobacco 4.75 UNITED KINGDOM Intertek Group 0.66 UNITED KINGDOM Shaftesbury 0.12 UNITED KINGDOM Britvic 0.19 UNITED KINGDOM IP Group 0.09 UNITED KINGDOM Smith (DS) 0.4 UNITED KINGDOM BT Group 1.26 UNITED KINGDOM Johnson Matthey 0.43 UNITED KINGDOM Smurfit Kappa Group 0.76 UNITED KINGDOM Burberry Group 0.62 UNITED KINGDOM Jupiter Fund Management 0.09 UNITED KINGDOM Spirent Communications 0.11 UNITED KINGDOM Cairn Energy 0.05 UNITED KINGDOM Kingfisher 0.57 UNITED KINGDOM St. -
Financial Reporting by Investment Managers
Financial reporting by investment managers The need for clarity December 2015 kpmg.co.uk © 2015 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent Financial reporting by Investment Managers member firms affiliated with KPMG International (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. 02 Executive summary Contents 04 Benchmarking 12 Survey 18 Narrative reporting 24 Corporate Governance 26 Remuneration 29 Accounting update 34 Conclusion © 2015 KPMG LLP, a UK limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Financial reporting by Investment Managers 01 01Executive summary Welcome to the 2015 A complex task more information in reports – without fully considering how that information edition of Financial Factors such as increased regulation is selected, presented and structured Reporting by Investment and market volatility are impacting – preparers will deliver documents that upon performance. In this respect, are opaque rather than enlightening. Managers. there is a real challenge inherent in As new risks emerge, arguably one of The investment industry is working in preparing reports that take account of these factors, while also providing the greatest challenges is to quantify an ever-more complex environment. the threats in a way that is meaningful. Businesses in the sector are not only a true and accurate picture of the performance of individual businesses This year’s reports suggest that cyber faced with tighter regulation, at a time risk, in particular, has been under when investor pressure to deliver that can be compared to reports published by other firms in the sector. -
FTSE Russell Publications
2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 250 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Infrastructure 0.43 UNITED Bytes Technology Group 0.23 UNITED Edinburgh Investment Trust 0.25 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM 4imprint Group 0.18 UNITED C&C Group 0.23 UNITED Edinburgh Worldwide Inv Tst 0.35 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM 888 Holdings 0.25 UNITED Cairn Energy 0.17 UNITED Electrocomponents 1.18 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aberforth Smaller Companies Tst 0.33 UNITED Caledonia Investments 0.25 UNITED Elementis 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aggreko 0.51 UNITED Capita 0.15 UNITED Energean 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Airtel Africa 0.19 UNITED Capital & Counties Properties 0.29 UNITED Essentra 0.23 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AJ Bell 0.31 UNITED Carnival 0.54 UNITED Euromoney Institutional Investor 0.26 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Alliance Trust 0.77 UNITED Centamin 0.27 UNITED European Opportunities Trust 0.19 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Allianz Technology Trust 0.31 UNITED Centrica 0.74 UNITED F&C Investment Trust 1.1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AO World 0.18 UNITED Chemring Group 0.2 UNITED FDM Group Holdings 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Apax Global Alpha 0.17 UNITED Chrysalis Investments 0.33 UNITED Ferrexpo 0.3 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ascential 0.4 UNITED Cineworld Group 0.19 UNITED Fidelity China Special Situations 0.35 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashmore -
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of Interest As required by SRD II, IVIS has to disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest or business relationships to its subscribers that may influence the preparation of its research and the actions undertaken to eliminate, mitigate or manage the actual or potential conflicts of interests. For a description of how these conflicts of interests are managed, please see IVIS’s Response to the UK Stewardship Code and Proxy Advisors Regulations where we set out in detail our approach to managing conflicts of interests. We have grouped together companies where there is a potential conflict of interest in the preparation of IVIS reports from strongest to weakest, into the following four categories: 1. Those IA members that are UK listed companies, which IVIS will produce an IVIS report on: · Brewin Dolphin Plc; · Close Brothers Group plc; · Hargreaves Lansdown plc; · Jupiter Fund Management plc; · Liontrust Asset Management plc; · Majedie Investments plc; · Man Group Ltd; · M&G Plc; · Quilter plc; · Rathbone Brothers plc; · River and Mercantile Group plc; · Ruffer Investment Company Ltd; · Schroders plc; · St. James's Place plc; and · Standard Life Aberdeen plc. 2. Those IA members whose parent company is a UK listed company which IVIS produces a report on (the listed company is in brackets) · Aviva Investors (Aviva Plc); · BP Investment Management Ltd (BP Plc); · Barclays Wealth and Investment Management (Barclays Plc); · HSBC Global Asset Management (UK) Ltd and HSBC Investment Funds (HSBC Plc); · Investec Asset Management (Investec plc); · Legal & General Investment Management (Legal & General Group plc); · Marks & Spencer Unit Trust Management Limited (Marks and Spencer Plc); and · RBS Collective Investment Funds Ltd (RBS Group Plc). -
Fifty Leading Women in Hedge Funds 2020
Fifty Leading Women in Hedge Funds 2020 I N A S S O C I A T I O N W I T H 50 LEADING WOMEN IN HEDGE FUNDS 2020 50 LEADING WOMEN IN HEDGE FUNDS 2020 Introduction HAMLIN LOVELL, CONTRIBUTING EDITOR, THE HEDGE FUND JOURNAL his is the eighth edition of our managers of all time – according to LCF Edmond 50 Leading Women in Hedge de Rothschild analysis – namely Bridgewater Funds report and is published Associates and Lone Pine. The two Lone Pine in association with EY for the women in this year’s report are two of the three seventh time. Whilst Covid-19 portfolio managers who succeeded Lone Pine’s has denied us the opportunity founder Steve Mandel. Three of the report’s to host accompanying events discretionary equity portfolio managers specialize in London and New York, at in the healthcare and biotechnology sector, which least this year, the professional achievements has attracted more attention this year for obvious Tof the women featured in this year’s report reasons. Four of the investment professionals shine through, nonetheless. We are so pleased work for systematic and quantitative hedge fund An analysis of the S&P to be publishing this report just a few days after managers, which is notable given the general Kamala Harris made history by becoming the dearth of women in STEM. Another noteworthy first female, first black and first Asian-American cluster is three women managing multi-billion Composite 1500 found US Vice-President-elect. s the leading global evidence is clear. Having more amounts in liquid credit strategies. -
Gender Diversity Index 2020
European Women on Boards Gender Diversity Index 2020 This project is co-funded by the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme of the European Union 668 COMPANIES STUDIED GDI GENDER DIVERSITY INDEX 34% women on boards Perfect gender equality 28% 1 women in general leadership functions Only 62 companies with a GDI of 0.8 or more 0.8 138 companies 17% 0.7 with a GDI of women in executive level of 0.7 or more company decision-makers 0.56 Average Only 42 companies have a female CEO 0.3 50 companies with a GDI of 0.2 0.3 or less 129 companies have at least one female 22 member of the C-suite companies with a GDI of 0.2 or less Only 9% 0 Chairs of Boards are women This project is co-funded by the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme of the European Union Content 04 Executive summary 06 Foreword 08 Introduction 11 Terminology 12 Overall findings 25 Commitment to fostering inclusion and diversity 28 Sectoral findings 31 Country findings 97 Annex – Methodology WOMEN ON BOARDS AND IN CORPORATE LEADERSHIP GENDER DIVERSITY INDEX 2020 3 Executive summary The year 2020 saw many disruptions that shook up not only individual businesses but also our entire economies and societies. Besides the direct health consequences This report analyses women’s participation in of COVID-19, the pandemic damaged the corporate governance in the largest European well-being and work-life balance of many companies that are listed in the STOXX 600 employees while also exposing many to Europe index or, in some countries, national redundancies or temporary unemployment stock exchange indexes. -
Investment Holdings As of June 30, 2019
Investment Holdings As of June 30, 2019 Montana Board of Investments | Portfolio as of June 30, 2019 Transparency of the Montana Investment Holdings The Montana Board of Investment’s holdings file is a comprehensive listing of all manager funds, separately managed and commingled, and aggregated security positions. Securities are organized across common categories: Pension Pool, Asset Class, Manager Fund, Aggregated Individual Holdings, and Non-Pension Pools. Market values shown are in U.S. dollars. The market values shown in this document are for the individual investment holdings only and do not include any information on accounts for receivables or payables. Aggregated Individual Holdings represent securities held at our custodian bank and individual commingled accounts. The Investment Holdings Report is unaudited and may be subject to change. The audited Unified Investment Program Financial Statements, prepared on a June 30th fiscal year-end basis, will be made available once the Legislative Audit Division issues the Audit Opinion. Once issued, the Legislative Audit Division will have the Audit Opinion available online at https://www.leg.mt.gov/publications/audit/agency-search-report and the complete audited financial statements will also be available on the Board’s website http://investmentmt.com/AnnualReportsAudits. Additional information can be found at www.investmentmt.com Montana Board of Investments | Portfolio as of June 30, 2019 2 Table of Contents Consolidated Asset Pension Pool (CAPP) 4 CAPP - Domestic Equities 5 CAPP - International -
Under the Bonnet Alex Savvides, JOHCM UK Dynamic Fund
March 2018 FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS ONLY Under the Bonnet Alex Savvides, JOHCM UK Dynamic Fund Investment background year Treasury yields have risen by 46bps since the start of the year to the end of February, in the UK the 10-year After the explosive start to 2018 by global stock gilt yield is up by 31bps. The UK unemployment rate markets, particularly in the US, February was a poor for the three months to December was 4.4% whilst in and volatile month. The ongoing strength in economic the US it was 4.1%. Wage inflation in the UK, judged conditions, hardening evidence of inflationary pressures by average weekly earnings, rose by 2.6% in December and intensifying threats of faster interest rate increases and by 2.5% for the final three months, compared to finally spilled over to cause a short but intense sell-off 2.9% wage growth in the US. UK inflation, driven higher in equities. by a weak pound sterling, remained at 2.7% (CPIH) Although difficult to pinpoint the specific trigger for in January (or 3% excluding housing costs), whilst in the market fall, it was most likely a reaction to US the US it is at 1.7%. Expectations in the US this year wage inflation pressures emanating from the ongoing are for three interest rate rises, although noise around strength in the US labour market, made worse by the four increases is growing, particularly given hawkish recent rapid rises in the US equity indices. January non- comments in late February from Jerome Powell, the new farm payrolls, released on the 2nd February, grew by a Chair of the Federal Reserve.