DOCSLIB.ORG

Download BALMNH No 19 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download BALMNH No 19 1998 .- ~_4 . Is!~¥r~ ~e~ ~~ "" ...... &.4I~""" ... ogtcal Survey m the Mobile-Tensaw Delta BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY The scientific publication of the Alabama Museum of Natural History. Richard L. Mayden, Editor,John C. Hall, Managing Editor. BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is published by the Alabama Museum of Natural History, a unit of The University of Alabama Museums. The BULLETIN succeeds its predecessor, the MUSEUM PAPERS, which was termi­ nated in 1961 upon the transfer of the Museum to the University from its parent organization, the Geological Survey of Alabama. The BULLETIN is devoted primarily to scholarship and research concerning the natural history of Alabama and the Southeast. It appears twice yearly in consecu­ tively numbered issues. Communication concerning manuscripts, style, and editorial policy should be addressed to: Editor, BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, The University of Alabama, Box 870340, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0340; tele­ phone (205) 348-9742. Prospective authors should examine the Notice to Authors inside the back cover. Orders and requests for general information should be addressed to BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, at the above address. Yearly sub­ scriptions (two issues) are $15.00 for individuals, $20.00 for corporations and institutions. Numbers may be purchased individually. Payment should accompany orders and subscriptions and checks should be made out to "The University of Alabama." Library exchanges should be handled through: Exchange Librarian, The University of Alabama, Box 870266, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0266. When citing this publication, authors are requested to use the following abbrevia­ tion: Bull. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist. ISSN: 0196-1039 Copyright 1998 by The Alabama Museum of Natural History ))~({ •"" __.~ I w)jO{( ALABAMA MUSEUM of Natural History Bulletin 19 June 1, 1998 The Mound Island Project: An Archaeological Survey in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta by Richard S. Fuller and Ian W. Brown THE UNIVERSIlY OF ALABAMA TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA Dedicated to DOUGLAS E. JONES Table of Contents List of Tables ..................................................................... iv Between Mounds I and] ................................... 90 List of Figures ................................................................... vi Mound] .............................................................. 90 Introduction ...................................................................... 1 MoundK ............................................................ 93 Research Design ................................................................ 2 Mound L ............................................................ 94 Reconnaissance Survey ................................................ 4 Mound M .................... ....................................... 99 Intensive Survey ............................................................ 4 Mound N .................................. ........................ 100 The Daily Log .................................................................... 5 Mound 0 .......................................................... 100 Results of the Survey .................... ................................... 31 Mound P ........................................................... 100 Site Summary .............................................................. 31 Mounds Qand R ............................................. 102 Artifact Analysis .......................................................... 31 Buried Midden North of Mound P ................ 103 Sites and Collections ....................................................... 37 The "Canal" Midden ....................................... 103 Middle-Tensaw Point (lBa272) ................................. 37 Summary of the Bottle Creek Collections ..... 105 Low Water (lBa443) ................................................... 37 Dominic Creek (lBa263) ......................................... 105 Middle River (lMb107) .............................................. 39 Bayou]essamine (lBa264) ....................................... 116 Whip-O-Will (lBa274) ................................................ 42 River Cane (lBa247) ................................................ 116 Carpenter (lMb179) .................................................. 42 1Ba246 ....................................................................... 118 Little Lizard Creek (l Ba195) ..................................... 45 Larry Island Branch (lBa269) ................................ 118 1Ba402 ......................................................................... 53 Briar Lake Slough (lBa270) .................................... 120 1Ba431 ....................................... .................................. 53 Fisher Island South (lBa273) .................................. 122 Tensaw River (lBa271) ............................................... 54 Farmar's Bluff (lBa275) .......................................... 123 Bottle Creek (lBa2) .................................................... 54 1Ba212 ....................................................................... 123 History of Investigations ........................................ 56 Live Oak Landing (lBa438) .................................... 123 The Recent Survey ................................................. 58 1Ba253 ....................................................................... 124 Mound A ............................................................ 58 1Ba214 ....................................................................... 124 Between Mounds A and B ................................. 61 Squirrel Bayou (lBa262) ......................................... 124 Mound B ............................................................ 62 Miffiin Lake #1 (lBa499) ......................................... 126 Mound C ............................................................ 67 Mifflin Lake #2 (lBa500) ......................................... 128 Mound D ............................................................ 68 The Alligator Lake "Mound" (No Site No.) ........... 131 Mound E ............................................................ 71 1Ba173 ....................................................................... 132 Mound F ............................................................. 75 Summary and Conclusions ........................................... 132 Between Mounds F and G ................................. 76 APPENDIX: Archaeological Phases and Complexes of Mound G ............................................................ 79 the Mobile-Tensaw Basin and Alabama Coast from Mound H ............................................................ 83 1400 B.C. to the Historic Period ............................. 144 Mound I ............................................................. 86 References Cited ............................... ............................ 151 List of Tables Table 1 Mound Island Project-site summary ......... 32 Table 24. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (lBa2), Mound Table 2 Mound Island Project-named pottery B, terrace ....................................................... 68 classes ............................................................. 34 Table 25. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (lBa2), Mound Table 3 Artifacts from the Middle-Tensaw Point B, main part of mound ................................. 69 site (lBa272) ................................................. 37 Table 26. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (1 Ba2), Mound Table 4. Artifacts from the Low Water site (lBa443) B, main part of mound ................................. 70 . ....................................................................... 38 Table 27. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (1 Ba2), Mound Table 5. Middle River (lMbl07), U.S.A. test excava- B, summit ...................................................... 71 tion-pottery classes by midden zone ......... 39 Table 28. Bottle Creek (lBa2), Mound B, main Table 6. Artifacts from the Middle River site mound ........................................................... 72 (IMbl07) ....................................................... 41 Table 29. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (lBa2) , Table 7. Artifacts from the Whip-O-Will site Mound C ........................................................ 73 (IBa274) ........................................................ 43 Table 30. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (lBa2), Table 8. Artifacts from the Carpenter site (lMbI79) Mound D ....................................................... 74 . ....................................................................... 44 Table 31. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (lBa2), Mound Table 9. Artifacts from Little Lizard Creek (lBaI95), E, southwest slope ......................................... 76 Locale I, beach .............................................. 48 Table 32. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (IBa2), Mound Table 10. Artifacts from Little Lizard Creek (lBaI95), E, southwest slope ......................................... 77 Locale I, midden ........................................... 49 Table 33. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (lBa2), Mound Table 11. Artifacts from Little Lizard Creek (lBaI95), E, northeast slope ......................................... 78 Locale II, upper and lower middens ........... 50 Table 34. Artifacts from Bottle Creek (1 Ba2), Mound Table 12. Artifacts from Little Lizard Creek (lBaI95), E, summit ....................................................... 79 Locale II, beach
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 4/Thursday, January 6, 2011/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2011 / Notices 795 responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 reasonably traced between the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in unassociated funerary objects and the this notice are the sole responsibility of Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas; National Park Service the Superintendent, Natchez Trace Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town, [2253–65] Parkway, Tupelo, MS. Oklahoma; Chitimacha Tribe of In 1951, unassociated funerary objects Louisiana; Choctaw Nation of Notice of Inventory Completion for were removed from the Mangum site, Oklahoma; Jena Band of Choctaw Native American Human Remains and Claiborne County, MS, during Indians, Louisiana; Mississippi Band of Associated Funerary Objects in the authorized National Park Service survey Choctaw Indians, Mississippi; and Possession of the U.S. Department of and excavation projects. The Tunica-Biloxi Indian Tribe of Louisiana. the Interior, National Park Service, whereabouts of the human remains is Natchez Trace Parkway, Tupelo, MS; unknown. The 34 unassociated funerary Representatives of any other Indian Correction objects are 6 ceramic vessel fragments, tribe that believes itself to be culturally 1 ceramic jar, 4 projectile points, 6 shell affiliated with the unassociated funerary AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. ornaments, 2 shells, 1 stone tool, 1 stone objects should contact Cameron H. ACTION: Notice; correction. artifact, 1 polished stone, 2 pieces of Sholly, Superintendent, Natchez Trace petrified wood, 2 bone artifacts, 1 Parkway, 2680 Natchez Trace Parkway, Notice is here given in accordance worked antler, 2 discoidals, 3 cupreous Tupelo, MS 38803, telephone (662) 680– with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act metal fragments and 2 soil/shell 4005, before February 7, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Investigations Into the King George
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22) Harry Gene Brignac Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brignac Jr, Harry Gene, "Further investigations into the King George Island Mounds site (16LV22)" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2720. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2720 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE KING GEORGE ISLAND MOUNDS SITE (16LV22) A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology By Harry Gene Brignac Jr. B.A. Louisiana State University, 2003 May, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to give thanks to God for surrounding me with the people in my life who have guided and supported me in this and all of my endeavors. I have to express my greatest appreciation to Dr. Rebecca Saunders for her professional guidance during this entire process, and for her inspiration and constant motivation for me to become the best archaeologist I can be.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • Caddo Archives and Economies
    Volume 2005 Article 14 2005 Caddo Archives and Economies Paul S. Marceaux University of Texas at Austin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Marceaux, Paul S. (2005) "Caddo Archives and Economies," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2005, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.2005.1.14 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2005/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Caddo Archives and Economies Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2005/iss1/14 Caddo Archives and Economies Paul Shawn Marceaux The University of Texas at Austin Introduction This article is a discussion of archival research on contact through historic period (ca. A.D. 1519 to 18th century) Caddo groups in eastern Texas and west central Louisiana.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Alabama CIAP Plan Amendment Fiscal Year 2009 and 2010
    State of Alabama CIAP Plan Amendment Fiscal Year 2009 and 2010 Robert Bentley, Governor, State of Alabama N. Gunter Guy, Jr., Commissioner, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Prepared by the State Lands Division, Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources July 2011 [this page is intentionally left blank] Table of Contents List of Abbreviations and Acronyms 1. Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i 2. Designated State Agency ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------iii 3. Designated Contact for Coastal Political Subdivisions ------------------------------------------------------v a. Baldwin County Commission ........................................................................................................ v b. Mobile County Commission ........................................................................................................... v 4. Governor’s Certification of Public Participation -----------------------------------------------------------vii 5. Coordination with Other Federal Resources and Programs ----------------------------------------------xi 6. Plan Implementation Program ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------xii 7. Proposed Project Lists----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 a. State of Alabama Tier One Lists.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1954 Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mcintire, William Grant, "Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana." (1954). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8099. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8099 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HjEHisroaic smm&ws in coastal Louisiana A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by William Grant MeIntire B. S., Brigham Young University, 195>G June, X9$k UMI Number: DP69477 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI DP69477 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest: ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • MASTER LIST MASTER LIST by Alphabet
    Oklahoma Cemetery Directory MASTER LIST By Alphabet OHCE Genealogy Group Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Oklahoma Cemetery Directory Based on the original compilations of the 77 County Cemetery Indexes , an Oklahoma Centennial Project of Oklahoma Home and Community Education OHCE Oklahoma Cemetery Index es originally completed November 2005 2nd Edition of additions and corrections for publishing March 2008 by Oklahoma OHCE State organization Completion of name change to Oklahoma Cemetery Directory May 2009 by Oklahoma County OHCE Genealogy Group 1st Edition of Oklahoma Cemetery Directory 2010 2nd Edition of Oklahoma Cemetery Directory September 2018 Information may be copied from this book for personal use, but may not be copied for profit. ©2018 OHCE Genealogy Group Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Printed in the United States of America September 2018 Oklahoma Cemetery Directory – Master List - By Alphabet Cemetery Twp-Rng-Sec Latitude Longitude Comments County The latitude and longitude coordinates that are underlined are verified at Google Maps. The ones not underlined can’t be guaranteed . Coordinates written like this 352241N mean 35º22'41" North Coordinates written like this 0972241W mean 97º22'41" West A A L Stephens Memorial T2N-R19E-Sec29NE 343720N 0951925W aka Stephens Memorial Park; Pushmatah Park A. L. Stephen's Cem A. L. Stephen's Cemetery T2N-R19E-Sec29NE 343720N 0951925W aka A L Stephens Memorial Pushmatah Partk; NE of Clayton Aaron Cemetery T1N-R22W-Sec12NE 343446N 0992757W northwest of Olustee Jackson Aaron Pickens Cemetery T6S-R3E-Sec22
    [Show full text]
  • Kolomoki Memoirs
    Kolomoki Memoirs By Williams H. Sears Edited with a Preface By Mark Williams and Karl T. Steinen University of Georgia and University of West Georgia University of Georgia Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report Number 70 2013 Preface Mark Williams and Karl T. Steinen This document was written by Bill Sears about 1988 at his home in Vero Beach, Florida. He had retired in 1982 after a career teaching anthropology and archaeology at from Florida Atlantic University. He was working on a book of his professional memoirs, intended to summarize the many archaeological sites he had worked on in Georgia and Florida from 1947 until his retirement. He wrote chapters on his 1948 excavation at the Wilbanks site (9CK5) in the Allatoona Reservoir (Sears 1958), on his 1953 excavation at the famous Etowah site (9BR1), and on his 1947-1951 excavations at the Kolomoki site (9ER1) published in four volumes (Sears 1951a, 1951b, 1953, 1956). These three sites constituted the bulk of his archaeological excavations in Georgia. Apparently he never wrote the intended chapters on his archaeological work in Florida, and the book was never completed. Following his death in December of 1996 (see Ruhl and Steinen 1997), his wife Elsie found the three chapters in a box and passed them on to one of us (Steinen). The chapters on Etowah and Wilbanks are being published separately. The document we present here is his unpublished chapter on the Kolomoki site. It provides a fascinating look at the state of archaeology in Georgia 65 years ago and is filled with pointed insights on many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Recalling Cahokia: Indigenous influences on English commercial expansion and imperial ascendancy in proprietary South Carolina, 1663-1721 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wall, William Kevin Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 06:16:12 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298767 RECALLING CAHOKIA: INDIGENOUS INFLUENCES ON ENGLISH COMMERCIAL EXPANSION AND IMPERIAL ASCENDANCY IN PROPRIETARY SOUTH CAROLINA, 1663-1721. by William kevin wall A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES PROGRAM In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2005 UMI Number: 3205471 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 3205471 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation Polygons
    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Trends in Tchula Period Pottery in Louisiana Steven Ray Fullen Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2005 Temporal trends in Tchula period pottery in Louisiana Steven Ray Fullen Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Fullen, Steven Ray, "Temporal trends in Tchula period pottery in Louisiana" (2005). LSU Master's Theses. 106. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/106 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TEMPORAL TRENDS IN TCHULA PERIOD POTTERY IN LOUISIANA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Steven R. Fullen B.A., Louisiana State University, 1998 December 2005 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to profoundly thank the numerous people who supported me both physically, mentally, and emotionally during the production of this body of work. To Dr. Saunders, I truly appreciate the patience, editorial support, and guidance you showed me during the trial that was this thesis—as well as the mental challenges you made me rise to. Dr. Paul Farnsworth, Dr. Heather McKillop, and Dr. Rob Mann additionally deserve credit for their input, and editorial support.
    [Show full text]