Rock Art Researchers in the Ukhahlamba Drakensberg
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rock art researchers in the uKhahlamba Drakensberg by Elwyn Jenkins he uKhahlamba Drakensberg the development of an understanding mountain range has a very of the art. Tlarge number of rock paintings, The first serious analysis of the including some of the most beautiful meaning of a Drakensberg painting in the world. Some date back possibly came about in 1873, when Joseph thousands of years and others were still Orpen, who was the British Resident being painted by San people late in the in Nomansland, was sent at the head nineteenth century. Since the nineteenth of a Sotho contingent to pursue Lan- century, they have fascinated visitors. galibalele. He found as a guide Qing, a People have searched for them and young San survivor, who was working recorded them in various ways. They as a hunter for a Sotho chief (Nquasha, have recorded their location; counted of Qacha’s Nek). Orpen had already them; made freehand copies, traced and copied paintings, and he now copied photographed them; excavated around paintings he saw along the way. He them; vandalised them; and removed requested Qing to give him explana- them. Many people have written about tions of the paintings. Qing spoke in the paintings, attempting to date them, sePhuti, which was translated by a So- describing them and analysing them. tho interpreter into English, and Orpen In this article I give a personal view of recorded his explanations. One of his the most notable of these personalities, copies, made in Sehonghong shelter, at the same time recounting in broad shows people interacting with strange outline what I believe to have been animals. The copy was not accurate, but 50 Natalia 49 (2019) Copyright © Natal Society Foundation 2019 Rock art researchers in the uKhahlamba Drakensberg it has become very well known and is that included Qing’s explanations for still often reproduced (Figure 1). two sets of paintings, to which Bleek’s Orpen sent his copies to the editor notes, which included Diä!kwain’s of the Cape Monthly Magazine, who comments, were published as an ad- forwarded them to Dr Wilhelm Bleek, dendum.2 a German linguist living in Cape Town. The first researcher to have been Together with his sister-in-law Lucy commissioned by a professional prehis- Lloyd, and later his daughter Dorothea, torian was Louis Tylor, a nephew of Sir Bleek had undertaken a project to tran- Edward Tylor, curator of the Pitt-Rivers scribe the lore of some San people who Museum in Oxford. In 1893, at his re- were living with them in Cape Town. quest, Louis went to the Drakensberg, The extensive Bleek records are now where he located 30 sites and copied housed at the University of Cape Town.1 about 80 groups of paintings freehand. Bleek showed Orpen’s copies to He also removed slabs, of which six are Diä!kwain and asked him to explain on display at the Pitt-Rivers. Many of them – thus his explanation was inde- the shelters he located have since been pendent of any other. Diä!kwain said claimed to have been found by people that the strange painting depicted rain who have named them after themselves. animals. Lucy Lloyd’s transcription of One of the paintings he copied, in what his account is the first record of San is now called Willcox Shelter, was of beliefs in rain animals and rain making. an enigmatic figure which is also to be The painting is now understood to show seen at two other sites (Figure 2).3 We shamans leading rain animals, while will return to it later. Tylor’s interest in two of them are thought to be hold- it shows that from the outset observers ing buchu plants, which were used to saw that the paintings included ones that subdue the rain animal. Orpen wrote an must have a ‘magical’ or supernatural article for the Cape Monthly Magazine explanation. Figure 1: Orpen’s copy of the rain animals panel 51 Natalia 49 (2019) CC-BY-NC cc Natal Society Foundation 2019 Rock art researchers in the uKhahlamba Drakensberg Trooper A.D. Whyte, who in 1905 was instructed to locate all the paintings in the Bushman’s Nek district. He located 37 sites. Patricia Vinnicombe reports that ‘As a result of his recommenda- tions, about 20 groups of paintings, some comprising more than one stone, were removed from various sites by an expert stone mason, R. Clingan, and deposited in the Natal Museum.’4 Wil- liam Anderson, government geologist in Natal, published a report in 1907 that included the first photographs of paintings.5 Jeremy Hollmann and Lawrence Msi- manga, of the KwaZulu-Natal Museum in Pietermaritzburg, reported in 2008 on a sad case of vandalism and the removal of rock art: uMhwabane Shelter (also known as eBusingatha Shelter) is a rock art site alongside the eBusingatha River in the amaZizi Traditional Authority Area. It is one of KwaZulu-Natal’s problem rock art sites. Today it still contains at least 50 hunter-gatherer paintings Figure 2: The figure in Willcox Shelter but there used to be many more. As copied by Tylor with other easily accessible rock art sites that have no access control, While Tylor was working at Main the art has suffered from vandalism. Caves, a farmer, Mark Hutchinson, told Authorities responded by removing some 31 painted rocks at the time of him that he had copied paintings eight- the visit of the British royal family to een years before at the request of Sir South Africa in 1947. The institutions Henry Bulwer. His copies are housed in entrusted with their care subsequently the KwaZulu-Natal Museum, and two neglected the art. Action is now be- of them were published in 1905 in the ing taken to conserve and display the Natal Agricultural and Mining Record. removed rock art.6 At the same time, Brother Otto Mäder This intervention shows how valuable from Mariannhill, an artist, removed the growth of professional archaeol- slabs – one is at Mariannhill – and he ogy has been in providing an overview made copies, mostly on the Kei River. of the situation regarding rock art in Subsequently, many enthusiasts have the Drakensberg and minimising ill- written about the paintings, copied them informed interaction with the art. and removed them. The KwaZulu-Natal Increased overseas awareness of Museum has many records and original the art led to visits by two prominent paintings. An early contributor was prehistorians. The Frenchman Abbé 52 Natalia 49 (2019) CC-BY-NC cc Natal Society Foundation 2019 Rock art researchers in the uKhahlamba Drakensberg Henri Breuil dominated ideas about his coloured copies. He had a serious rock art around the world in the first aim: to cut through the ‘maelstrom’ of half of the twentieth century. He first theories and find a ‘sober approach’. visited South Africa in 1929, and took This was an artistic one, not a rational, shelter in the country during the Second logical procedure: it was what he called World War. He promoted two theories ‘pure aesthetic enjoyment’. Though he about rock art: that it was motivated said he was putting aside preconceived by sympathetic magic, painted to aid ideas, his approach was subjective and the hunt (though there are actually few Western. He did not refer to San beliefs hunting scenes in southern African rock because he said the significance of the art); or that it was art for art’s sake – a art was ‘self-evident’. philosophical view of the nature of Battiss’s mentors were Abbé Breuil art dating from the early nineteenth and the government archaeologist C. century – consisting of ‘pictures that van Riet Lowe, who wrote the preface resulted from a universal, innate desire and foreword respectively to The Art- to express oneself and from a simple ists of the Rocks. He thought South delight in capturing daily life’.7 His African rock art could be divided into utterances on southern African rock three periods. He could not believe that art were unhelpful, as he believed the the most beautiful and skilled art was artists were ancient Minoans, Cretans painted and engraved by the San; he or Phoenicians. He claimed to have believed the ‘little Bushmen’ were naïve identified paintings of Phoenicians in and primitive and incapable of great the Drakensberg.8 art. Therefore the ‘Early’ art, which Professor Leo Frobenius, who un- was the most beautiful, was probably dertook expeditions from Germany to done by unidentified artists. He wrote South Africa, Southern Rhodesia and approvingly that ‘in Game Pass Valley other parts of the world that made vast in the Natal Drakensberg there are very numbers of copies, brought out a team clear hooded and cloaked figures with in 1928–1930 that copied among oth- white monkey faces. Professor van Riet ers 55 paintings from western Lesotho Lowe, who has made a special study and 45 from the Drakensberg. They of them, considers they are foreigners’ are housed in the Frobenius Institute in (Figure 4).11 His ‘Middle’ period was Frankfurt-am-Main. problematic, and the ‘Last’ period – The most prominent South African consisting of scenes – was by the San. to popularise awareness of the art was A different approach to investigating the artist Walter Battiss, who frequently the art was taken by Marion How, who acknowledged the influence of southern was born in Basutoland. Her father and African rock art on his own work. He grandfather had an intimate knowledge published two books on rock art, The of the Basotho and their history. She Amazing Bushman (1939)9 and The drew on their records and the help Artists of the Rocks, which appeared of many other people in publishing in a handsome limited edition of 500 her book, The Mountain Bushmen of copies in 1948.10 He was a pioneer Basutoland (1970).12 The illustrator, in the use of photography to record James Walton, lived in Basutoland rock art, and included monochrome for thirteen years, during which time photographs in his books in addition to he copied paintings from hundreds of 53 Natalia 49 (2019) CC-BY-NC cc Natal Society Foundation 2019 Rock art researchers in the uKhahlamba Drakensberg rock shelters, many of them previously information of this kind was uncovered unknown.