DOCSLIB.ORG

Triassic and Jurassic Formations of the Newark Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Triassic and Jurassic Formations of the Newark Basin TRIASSIC AND JURASSIC FORMATIONS OF THE NEWARK BASIN PAUL E. OLSEN Bingham Laboratories, Department of Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Abstract Newark Supergroup deposits of the Newark Basin 1946), makes this deposit ideal for studying time-facies (New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania) are divided relationships and evolutionary phenomena. These into nine formations called (from bottom up): Stockton recent discoveries have focused new interest on Newark Formation (maximum 1800 m); Lockatong Formation strata. (maximum 1150 m); Passaic Formation (maximum 6000 m); Orange Mountain Basalt (maximum 200 m); The Newark Basin (Fig. 1 and 2) is the largest of the Feltville Formation (maximum 600 m); Preakness exposed divisions of the Newark Supergroup, covering Basalt (maximum + 300 m); Towaco Formation (max- about 7770 km2 and stretching 220 km along its long imum 340 m); Hook Mountain Basalt (maximum 110 axis. The basin contains the thickest sedimentary se- m); and Boonton Formation (maximum + 500 m). Each quence of any exposed Newark Supergroup basin and formation is characterized by its own suite of rock correspondingly covers the greatest continuous amount - types, the differences being especially obvious in the of time. Thus, the Newark Basin occupies a central posi- number, thickness, and nature of their gray and black tion in the study of the Newark Supergroup as a whole. sedimentary cycles (or lack thereof). In well over a century of study the strata of Newark Fossils are abundant in the sedimentary formations of Basin have received a relatively large amount of atten- the Newark Basin and provide a means of correlating tion. By 1840, the basic map relations were worked out the sequence with other early Mesozoic areas. The (Rogers, 1839, 1840, Cook, 1868) and by 1898, the ma- Stockton, Lockatong, and most of the Passaic Forma- jor rock-stratigraphic subdivisions of the basin section tion are Late Triassic (?Middle and Late Carnian- were delimited and named (Darton, 1890; Kiimmel, Rhaetic) while the uppermost Passaic Formation (at 1897, 1898). Despite this long tradition, fundamental least locally) and younger beds appear to be Early aspects of its historical and structural geology have re- Jurassic (Hettangian and Sinemurian) in age. The mained essentially unexplored. The lithostratigraphy of distribution of kinds of fossils is intimately related to se- the younger sediments, in particular, has received short quences of rock types in sedimentary cycles. shrift. Recently I have revised certain aspects of Newark Basin stratigraphy with an emphasis on the younger INTRODUCTION rocks (Olsen, in press). In the process I haveproposed a number of new formational names (Table 2). Here I will Far from being the consequence of the last gasps of review the formations of the Newark Basin and attempt the Appalachian Orogeny, Late Triassic and Early to place their broader lithostratigraphic features into Jurassic Newark Supergroup basins formed in dynamic biostratigraphic context. association with the opening of the Atlantic Ocean (Sanders, 1974; Van Houten 1977; Manspeizer,Puffer, OVERVIEW OF NEWARK BASIN FORMATIONS and Cousminer, 1978; Olsen, 1978). In addition, Newark Supergroup rocks, once thought to be nearly As currently defined (Olsen, 1978; Van Houten, 1977; barren of fossils, are now known to be exceptionally Cornet, 1977), the Newark Supergroup consists of rich in organic remains (Thomson, 1979), replete with predominantly red elastics and volumetrically minor plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates spanning some 35 basaltic igneous rocks exposed in 13 major and 7 minor million years of the Early Mesozoic (Cornet, 1977). elongate basins preserved in the Piedmont, New Finally, long episodes of unusually continuous England, and Maritime physiographic provinces of deposition coupled with an abundance of laterally eastern North America (Figure 1, Table 1). In general, extensive stratigraphic "marker" beds (McLaughin, the long axes of these basins parallel the fabric of the In W. Manspeizer (ed.), 1980, Field Studies in New Jersey Geology and Guide to Field Trips, 52nd Ann. Mtg. New York State Geological Assoc.iation, Newark College of Arts and Sciences, Newark, Rutgers University, p. 2-39. 3 FIELD STUDIES OF NEW JERSEY GEOLOGY AND GUIDE TO FIELD TRIPS SCALE (krn) 0 800 l~*~l'l.l - EXPOSED CS=3> INFERRED Fig. 1 Newark Supergroup of eastern North America. Key to numbers given in Table 1. The Newark Basin is 11. Data from Olsen, 1978. TRIASSIC AND JURASSIC FORMATIONS OF THE NEWARK BASIN Fig. 2 The Newark Basin. A. Geologic map showing distribution of formations, normal, it is clear many, if not all of them, have some conglomeritic facies (irregular stipple), and major clusters component of strike slip, although the significance of this of detrital cycles in Passaic Formation (parallel black lines) component is unclear. Symbols for the names of structural -- abbreviations of formations and diabase bodies as features used in this paper are as follows: A, Montgomery- follows: 9, Boonton Formation; C, Coffman Hill Diabase; Chester fault block; B, Bucks-Hunterdon fault block; C, Cd, Cushetunk Mountain Diabase; F, Feltville Formation; Sourland Mountain fault block; D, Watchung syncline; E, H, Hook Mountain Basalt; Hd, Haycock Mountain New Germantown syncline; F, Flemington syncline; G, Diabase; Jb, Jacksonwald Basalt; L, Lockatong Sand Brook syncline; H, Jacksonwald syncline; I, Ramapo Formation; 0, Orange Mountain Basalt; P, Passaic fault; J, braided connectoin between Ramapo and Formation; Pb, Preakness Basalt; Pd, Palisade Diabase; Hopewell faults; K, Flemington fault; L, Chalfont fault; Pk, Perkasie Member of Passaic Formation; Rd, Rocky M, Hopewell fault. Hill Diabase; S, Stockton Formation; Sc, carbonate Facies of Stockton Formation; Sd, Sourland Mountain Diabase; Data for A and B from Kimmel, 1897; Lewis and Kimmel, T, Towaco Formation. 1910-1912; Darton, 1890, 1902; Darton, et a]., 1908; Glaeser, 1963; Sanders, 1962; Van Houten, 1969; B. Structural features of the Newark Basin. Faults are all McLaughlin, 1941, 1943, 1944, 1945, 1946a, 1946b; drawn as normal with dots on the down-thrown side; Bascom, et at., 1909; Willard, et al., 1959; Faille, 1963; portions of basin margin not mapped as faults should be Manspeizer, pers. comm.; Olsen, in press, and personal regarded as onlaps. While all the faults are mapped here as observation. Appalachian Orogene (Rodgers, 1970; Van Houten, border the Newark Basin along its northeast and north- 1977). The rocks of these basins present a relatively west margins (Figure 2). The southeastern and unified lithology and structure and unconformably southwestern portions of the Newark Basin overlie and overlie (or intrude) Precambrian and Palaeozoic rocks. are bordered by Palaeozoic and Precambrian rocks of They are in turn overlain by post-Jurassic rocks of the the Blue Ridge and Piedmont Provinces. Newark Basin Coastal Plain, Pleistocene deposits or Recent alluvium sediments rest with a profound unconformity on base- and soils. In addition, early Mesozoic red clastics, ment rocks and mostly dip 5 Â- 25' to the northwest. basaltic volcanics, and evaporites at the base of some se- The entire stratigraphic column reaches a cumulative quences on the continental shelf and also at least 12 trigonometrically calculated thickness of over 10,300 m units recognized beneath the Atlantic Coastal Plain pro- (the sum of the maximum thicknesses of all the forma- bably should be grouped in the Newark Supergroup tions), although the total thickness of sediments actually (Figure 1). deposited at any one spot was probably much less. Red clastics are the dominant sediments; intrusive and ex- Precambrian and early Paleaozoic rocks of the trusive tholeiites are the dominant igneous rocks. The southwestern prongs of the New England Upland oldest sediments are probably middle Carnian (early 5 FIELD STUDIES OF NEW JERSEY GEOLOGY AND GUIDE TO FIELD TRIPS Table 1 Key to Rock-stratigraphic term Bas in name Figure 11 I Age range Carnian- ?Nor ian 1 Chatham Group Deep River Basin (Late Triassic) 2 undifferentiated Davie County Basin Late Triassic 'Carnian (Late 3 undifferentiated Farmville Basin Triassic) 4 small basins south 4 undifferentiated 'PCarnian (Late of Farmville Basin Triassic) Dan River and Danville Carnian- ';Norian Dan River Group I Bas ins (Late Triassic) Tuckahoe and Richmond Basin and 6 Carnian (Late Chesterfield Groups subsidiary basins Triassic) Norian- PSinemurian 7 1 none Culpeper Basin (Late Triassic- Early Jurassic) Carnian (Late Taylorsville Basin Triassic) Scottsville Basin and ?Late Triassic- 9 undifferentiated 2 subsidiary basins Early Jurassic Carnian-Het tangian 10 none Gettysburg Basin (Late Triassic- Early Jurassic) Carnian .Sinemurian 11 none Newark Basin (Late Triassic- Early Jurassic) ?Late Triassic- 12 none Pomperaug Bas in 1 Early Jurassic Hartford Basin and Norian-?Bajocian 13 none subsidiary Cherry (Late Triassic- Brook Basin ?Middle Jurassic) ?Norian- PToarcian 14 1 none Deerfield Basin (Late Triassic- Early Jurassic) ?Middle Triassic- 15 Fundy Group Fundy Basin 1 Early Jurassic Chedabucto Format ion Chedabucto Basin ?Late Triassic- (=Eurydice Format ion?) (=Orpheus Basin?) Early Jurassic TRIASSIC AND JURASSIC FORMATIONS OF THE NEWARK BASIN Table 2 Baird and Take, Kummel, 1897; 1959; Baird, 1964; (Olsen, in press) Lyman, 1895 Darton, 1890 Colbert, 1965 This Article American New Red Sandstone Newark System Newark System Newark Supergroup (of Newark Basin) (of Newark Basin) (of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montgomery Township N.R.I. Appendix – Nitrate Dilution
    Nitrate Dilution Modeling of Montgomery Township, Somerset County, NJ Prepared for: Montgomery Township Environmental Commission Somerset County, NJ 2261 Route 206 Belle Mead, NJ 08502 Prepared by: The GIS Center Stony Brook-Millstone Watershed Association 31 Titus Mill Road Pennington, NJ 08534 April 8, 2004 Introduction Nitrate from natural sources generally only occurs in ground water at low levels but anthropogenic sources can lead to elevated concentrations. Sources include fertilizers, animal waste, and sewage effluent. Nitrate is considered a contaminant in ground water because of various impacts to human health and aquatic ecology. For instance, high levels of nitrate intake in infants can lead to methemoglobinemia, or blue baby syndrome (Hem, 1985; U.S. EPA, 1991). Because of its low natural occurrence and solubility and stability in groundwater, nitrate can also serve as an indicator for possible bacterial, viral, or chemical contaminants of anthropogenic origin. Nitrogen is present in septic system effluent and is converted to nitrate through biological processes active in the soil below the drain field. Once this nitrification process is complete, nitrate is a stable and mobile compound in ground water under normal conditions (Hoffman and Canace, 2001). Nitrate concentrations resulting from septic effluent are mitigated by dilution if the septic effluent is combined over time with water entering the ground through infiltration during and after storm events. The extent of this dilution effect is clearly dependent on long-term rates of both infiltration and nitrate loading from septic system sources. The density of septic systems relative to infiltration rates in a particular area is therefore a critical factor controlling the ultimate nitrate level in ground water.
    [Show full text]
  • Triassic- Jurassic Stratigraphy Of
    Triassic- Jurassic Stratigraphy of the <JF C7 JL / Culpfeper and B arbour sville Basins, VirginiaC7 and Maryland/ ll.S. PAPER Triassic-Jurassic Stratigraphy of the Culpeper and Barboursville Basins, Virginia and Maryland By K.Y. LEE and AJ. FROELICH U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1472 A clarification of the Triassic--Jurassic stratigraphic sequences, sedimentation, and depositional environments UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1989 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Lee, K.Y. Triassic-Jurassic stratigraphy of the Culpeper and Barboursville basins, Virginia and Maryland. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1472) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.16:1472 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Triassic. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic Jurassic. 3. Geology Culpeper Basin (Va. and Md.) 4. Geology Virginia Barboursville Basin. I. Froelich, A.J. (Albert Joseph), 1929- II. Title. III. Series. QE676.L44 1989 551.7'62'09755 87-600318 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract.......................................................................................................... 1 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction... ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RI37 Stratigraphic Nomenclature Of
    ,--' ( UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO.37 STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF NONMARINE CRETACEOUS ROCKS OF INNER MARGIN OF COASTAL PLAIN IN DELAWARE AND ADJACENT STATES BY ROBERT R. JORDAN STATE OF DELAWARE.. NEWARK, DELAWARE JUNE 1983 STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF NONMARINE CRETACEOUS ROCKS OF INNER MARGIN OF COASTAL PLAIN IN DELAWARE AND ADJACENT STATES By Robert R. Jordan Delaware Geological Survey June 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT. ....... 1 INTRODUCTION ..... 2 Purpose and Scope. 2 Acknowledgments.. 4 REGIONAL SETTING. 4 Regional Relationships . 4 Structural Features. 5 DESCRIPTIONS OF UNITS .. 8 Historical Summary 8 Potomac Formation. 13 Nomenclature. 13 Extent. 13 Lithology . 14 Patuxent Formation . 18 Nomenclature. 18 Extent.. 18 Lithology .... 18 Arundel Formation. 19 Nomenclature.. 19 Extent. .• 19 Lithology • 20 Page Patapsco Formation. .. 20 Nomenclature . 20 Extent .. 20 Lithology.. 20 Raritan Formation . 21 Nomenclature .. 21 Extent .. 22 Lithology.. 23 Magothy Formation .. 24 Nomenclature . 24 Extent .. 24 Lithology.. 25 ENVIRONMENTS OF DEPOSITION 28 AGES .... 29 SUBDIVISIONS AND CORRELATIONS .. 32 REFERENCES . 34 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Geologic map of nonmarine Cretaceous deposits .. ..•.• •.. 3 2. Structural features of the Coastal Plain. ............ 6 3. Schematic diagram of lateral and vertical relationships of nonmarine Cretaceous deposits•....•... 34 TABLES Page Table 1. Usage of group and formation names. 9 STRATIGRAPHIC NOMENCLATURE OF NONMARINE CRETACEOUS ROCKS OF INNER MARGIN OF COASTAL PLAIN IN DELAWARE AND ADJACENT STATES ABSTRACT Rocks of Cretaceous age deposited in continental and marginal environments, and now found along the inner edge of the northern Atlantic Coastal Plain, have historically been classified as the Potomac Group and the Potomac, Patuxent, Arundel, Patapsco, Raritan, and Magothy forma­ tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Article
    A couple of partially-feathered creatures about the The Outside Story size of a turkey pop out of a stand of ferns. By the water you spot a flock of bigger animals, lean and predatory, catching fish. And then an even bigger pair of animals, each longer than a car, with ostentatious crests on their heads, stalk out of the heat haze. The fish-catchers dart aside, but the new pair have just come to drink. We can only speculate what a walk through Jurassic New England would be like, but the fossil record leaves many hints. According to Matthew Inabinett, one of the Beneski Museum of Natural History’s senior docents and a student of vertebrate paleontology, dinosaur footprints found in the sedimentary rock of the Connecticut Valley reveal much about these animals and their environment. At the time, the land that we know as New England was further south, close to where Cuba is now. A system of rift basins that cradled lakes ran right through our region, from North Carolina to Nova Scotia. As reliable sources of water, with plants for the herbivores and fish for the carnivores, the lakes would have been havens of life. While most of the fossil footprints found in New England so far are in the lower Connecticut Valley, Dinosaur Tracks they provide a window into a world that extended throughout the region. According to Inabinett, the By: Rachel Marie Sargent tracks generally fall into four groupings. He explained that these names are for the tracks, not Imagine taking a walk through a part of New the dinosaurs that made them, since, “it’s very England you’ve never seen—how it was 190 million difficult, if not impossible, to match a footprint to a years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDEBOOK the Mid-Triassic Muschelkalk in Southern Poland: Shallow-Marine Carbonate Sedimentation in a Tectonically Active Basin
    31st IAS Meeting of Sedimentology Kraków 2015 GUIDEBOOK The Mid-Triassic Muschelkalk in southern Poland: shallow-marine carbonate sedimentation in a tectonically active basin Guide to field trip B5 • 26–27 June 2015 Joachim Szulc, Michał Matysik, Hans Hagdorn 31st IAS Meeting of Sedimentology INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION Kraków, Poland • June 2015 OF SEDIMENTOLOGISTS 225 Guide to field trip B5 (26–27 June 2015) The Mid-Triassic Muschelkalk in southern Poland: shallow-marine carbonate sedimentation in a tectonically active basin Joachim Szulc1, Michał Matysik2, Hans Hagdorn3 1Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland ([email protected]) 2Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark ([email protected]) 3Muschelkalk Musem, Ingelfingen, Germany (encrinus@hagdorn-ingelfingen) Route (Fig. 1): From Kraków we take motorway (Żyglin quarry, stop B5.3). From Żyglin we drive by A4 west to Chrzanów; we leave it for road 781 to Płaza road 908 to Tarnowskie Góry then to NW by road 11 to (Kans-Pol quarry, stop B5.1). From Płaza we return to Tworog. From Tworog west by road 907 to Toszek and A4, continue west to Mysłowice and leave for road A1 then west by road 94 to Strzelce Opolskie. From Strzelce to Siewierz (GZD quarry, stop B5.2). From Siewierz Opolskie we take road 409 to Kalinów and then turn we drive A1 south to Podskale cross where we leave south onto a local road to Góra Sw. Anny (accomoda- for S1 westbound to Pyrzowice and then by road 78 to tion). From Góra św. Anny we drive north by a local road Niezdara.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Triassic: Current Insights Into the Regional Setting and Energy Resource Potential of NW Europe
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322739556 An introduction to the Triassic: Current insights into the regional setting and energy resource potential of NW Europe Article in Geological Society London Special Publications · January 2018 DOI: 10.1144/SP469.1 CITATIONS READS 3 92 3 authors, including: Tom Mckie Ben Kilhams Shell U.K. Limited Shell Global 37 PUBLICATIONS 431 CITATIONS 11 PUBLICATIONS 61 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Reconstructing the Norwegian volcanic margin View project Paleocene of the Central North Sea: regional mapping from dense hydrocarbon industry datasets. View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ben Kilhams on 22 November 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on January 26, 2018 An introduction to the Triassic: current insights into the regional setting and energy resource potential of NW Europe MARK GELUK1*, TOM MCKIE2 & BEN KILHAMS3 1Gerbrandylaan 18, 2314 EZ Leiden, The Netherlands 2Shell UK Exploration & Production, 1 Altens Farm Road, Nigg, Aberdeen AB12 3FY, UK 3Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij (NAM), PO Box 28000, 9400 HH Assen, The Netherlands *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: A review of recent Triassic research across the Southern Permian Basin area demon- strates the role that high-resolution stratigraphic correlation has in identifying the main controls on sedimentary facies and, subsequently, the distribution of hydrocarbon reservoirs. The depositio- nal and structural evolution of these sedimentary successions was the product of polyphase rifting controlled by antecedent structuration and halokinesis, fluctuating climate, and repeated marine flooding, leading to a wide range of reservoir types in a variety of structural configurations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Time Scale Is the Eon
    Exploring Geologic Time Poster Illustrated Teacher's Guide #35-1145 Paper #35-1146 Laminated Background Geologic Time Scale Basics The history of the Earth covers a vast expanse of time, so scientists divide it into smaller sections that are associ- ated with particular events that have occurred in the past.The approximate time range of each time span is shown on the poster.The largest time span of the geologic time scale is the eon. It is an indefinitely long period of time that contains at least two eras. Geologic time is divided into two eons.The more ancient eon is called the Precambrian, and the more recent is the Phanerozoic. Each eon is subdivided into smaller spans called eras.The Precambrian eon is divided from most ancient into the Hadean era, Archean era, and Proterozoic era. See Figure 1. Precambrian Eon Proterozoic Era 2500 - 550 million years ago Archaean Era 3800 - 2500 million years ago Hadean Era 4600 - 3800 million years ago Figure 1. Eras of the Precambrian Eon Single-celled and simple multicelled organisms first developed during the Precambrian eon. There are many fos- sils from this time because the sea-dwelling creatures were trapped in sediments and preserved. The Phanerozoic eon is subdivided into three eras – the Paleozoic era, Mesozoic era, and Cenozoic era. An era is often divided into several smaller time spans called periods. For example, the Paleozoic era is divided into the Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous,and Permian periods. Paleozoic Era Permian Period 300 - 250 million years ago Carboniferous Period 350 - 300 million years ago Devonian Period 400 - 350 million years ago Silurian Period 450 - 400 million years ago Ordovician Period 500 - 450 million years ago Cambrian Period 550 - 500 million years ago Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Lakes As an Environmental Control on Theropod Movement in the Jurassic of the Hartford Basin
    geosciences Article Perennial Lakes as an Environmental Control on Theropod Movement in the Jurassic of the Hartford Basin Patrick R. Getty 1,*, Christopher Aucoin 2, Nathaniel Fox 3, Aaron Judge 4, Laurel Hardy 5 and Andrew M. Bush 1,6 1 Center for Integrative Geosciences, University of Connecticut, 354 Mansfield Road, U-1045, Storrs, CT 06269, USA 2 Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 500 Geology Physics Building, P.O. Box 210013, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA; [email protected] 3 Environmental Systems Graduate Group, University of California, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95340, USA; [email protected] 4 14 Carleton Street, South Hadley, MA 01075, USA; [email protected] 5 1476 Poquonock Avenue, Windsor, CT 06095, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, U-3403, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-413-348-6288 Academic Editors: Neil Donald Lewis Clark and Jesús Martínez Frías Received: 2 February 2017; Accepted: 14 March 2017; Published: 18 March 2017 Abstract: Eubrontes giganteus is a common ichnospecies of large dinosaur track in the Early Jurassic rocks of the Hartford and Deerfield basins in Connecticut and Massachusetts, USA. It has been proposed that the trackmaker was gregarious based on parallel trackways at a site in Massachusetts known as Dinosaur Footprint Reservation (DFR). The gregariousness hypothesis is not without its problems, however, since parallelism can be caused by barriers that direct animal travel. We tested the gregariousness hypothesis by examining the orientations of trackways at five sites representing permanent and ephemeral lacustrine environments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dinosaur Track from New Jersey at the State Museum in Trenton
    New Jersey Geological and Water Survey Information Circular What's in a Rock? A Dinosaur Track from New Jersey at the State Museum in Trenton Introduction a large dinosaur track (fig. 2) on the bottom. Most of the rock is sedimentary, sandstone from the 15,000-foot-thick Passaic A large, red rock in front of the New Jersey State Museum Formation. The bottom part is igneous, lava from the 525-foot- (NJSM) in Trenton (fig. 1) is more than just a rock. It has a thick Orange Mountain Basalt, which overspread the Passaic fascinating geological history. This three-ton slab, was excavated Formation. (The overspreading lava was originally at the top of from a construction site in Woodland Park, Passaic County. It the rock, but the rock is displayed upside down to showcase the was brought to Trenton in 2010 and placed upside down to show dinosaur footprint). The rock is about 200 million years old, from the Triassic footprints Period of geologic time. It formed in a rift valley, the Newark Passaic Formation Basin, when Africa, positioned adjacent to the mid-Atlantic states, began to pull eastward and North America began to pull westward contact to open the Atlantic Ocean. The pulling and stretching caused faults to move and the rift valley to subside along border faults including the Ramapo Fault of northeastern New Jersey, about 8 miles west of Woodland Park. Sediments from erosion of higher Collection site Orange Mountain Basalt top N Figure 1. Rock at the New Jersey State Museum. Photo by W. Kuehne Adhesion ripples DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS 0 1 2 mi Orange Mountain Basalt L 32 cm Jo (Lower Jurassic) 0 1 2 km W 25.4 cm contour interval 20 feet ^p Passaic Formation (Upper Triassic) Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Trail Reference Guide
    1. Hunterdon County SUMMARY OF RULES AND REGULATIONS Arboretum County Reference Map 2. Charlestown Reserve The rules and regulations governing use of facilities or properties administered by the Hiking Trail Hunterdon County Division of Parks and Recreation are promulgated in accordance with provisions of the N.J. Statutes Title 40:32-7.12, which reads as follows: 3. Clover Hill Park With the exception of park "The Board of Chosen Freeholders may by resolution make, alter, amend, and properties with reservable facilities, 4. Cold Brook Reserve repeal rules and regulations for the supervision, regulation and control of all activities carried on, conducted, sponsored, arranged, or provided for in all properties are “carry in / carry 5. Columbia Trail connection with a public golf course or other county recreational, playground, Reference out” and trash/recycling receptacles or public entertainment facility, and for the protection of property, and may 6. Court Street Park prescribe and enforce fines and penalties for the violation of any such rule or are not provided. Please plan regulation.” 7. Crystal Springs Preserve accordingly and do not leave any 8. Cushetunk Mountain These rules and regulations have been promulgated for the protection of trash/recyclables behind. our patrons and for the facilities and natural resources administered by the Guide Preserve Hunterdon County Division of Parks and Recreation. Permits: A fully executed Facility Use Permit, issued by the County of 9. Deer Path Park & Round Hunterdon for any activity, shall authorize the activity only insofar as it may be performed in strict accordance with the terms and conditions Mountain Section thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset County, New Jersey Geology
    Natural and Cultural Resource Inventory & Guide Somerset County, New Jersey Geology 456659 456613 Peapack- Bernardsville ab206 456525 Gladstone Borough Borough 456661 456624 456512 456657 ab202 Far Hills Borough 456512 Bernards 456640 [^287 Township Bedminster Township 456622 456655 456523 NOTES 1. This map was prepared using GIS data produced & distributed 456531 456652 ¤£22 by the New Jersey Geological Survey. 456665 Watchung 2. Depiction of environmental features is for general information 456653 Borough purposes only, and shall not be construed to define the legal ¦¨§78 ¦¨§78 geographic jurisdiction associated with any statutes or rules. 456651 3. Somerset County uses the following map projection & coordinate system when presenting GIS data: 456620 - Horizontal: North American Datum 1983 (NAD83) ab206 - Vertical: North American Vertical Datum 1987 (NAVD87) [^287 - Coordinate System: New Jersey State Plane Feet ab202 456618 DATA SOURCES Warren Township NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 638 641 456 456 636 649 - Geological Formations 456529 456 456 - Fault Lines Bridgewater Township North Plainfield NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF Green Brook Borough ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (NJDEP) 456614 - Streams ¤£22 Township 456616 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NJDOT) 456679 456651 - Major Roads 456634 SOMERSET COUNTY GIS ENTERPRISE 456673 - County Boundaries - Municipal Boundaries 456527 - Parcel Boundaries (!28 ¤£22 456525 Raritan 456644 456643 Branchburg Borough Somerville 456633 456626 Bound Brook Township (!28 Borough Borough 637 456635 456
    [Show full text]
  • Hikes Are Scheduled for Almost Every Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday
    Hunterdon Hiking Club Organized 1980 Affiliate of the Hunterdon County Department of Parks and Recreation FALL 2015 NEWSLETTER SEPTEMBER – OCTOBER - NOVEMBER HHC Web Page: www.HunterdonHikingClub.org ______________________________________________________ Hunterdon Hiking Club C/O Hunterdon County Dept of Parks & Recreation PO Box 2900 Flemington, NJ 08822-2900 PUBLIC VERSION-----Note: this version of the newsletter does not contain hike meeting times/contact phone #s Non club members should contact Bill Claus 908-788-1843or Lynn Burtis 908-782-6428 for more information before joining a hike FIRST CLASS MAIL GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE HUNTERDON HIKING CLUB Who we are! The Hunterdon Hiking Club (HHC) is an affiliated organization of the Hunterdon County Parks System. The purpose of the club is to provide a forum where individuals may join with others for the personal enjoyment of hiking and other outdoor activities. What do we do? Hikes are scheduled for almost every Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. Bicycle rides are scheduled on Tuesdays and Fridays in season and shorter hikes are scheduled for Tuesdays. Canoe/kayak trips and X-country skiing are often scheduled as the weather permits. Weekday trips combining a city walk plus a visit to a museum are occasionally scheduled. HHC General Membership Meetings HHC meetings are the second Thursday of the month, at the Parks Office: 1020 Highway 31, Lebanon, NJ 08833 www.co.hunterdon.nj.us/depts/parks/parks.htm. The meetings start at 7pm. (No meetings in July, August & December). Hunterdon Hiking Club Officers - June 2015 – May 2016 President: Bill Claus 908-788-1843 Secretary: Nardi B.
    [Show full text]