THOMAS LAPSLEY a 1772 Settler in Southwestern Pennsylvania Revised November 2005 Dean Froehlich Compiler © 1983, 2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THOMAS LAPSLEY a 1772 Settler in Southwestern Pennsylvania Revised November 2005 Dean Froehlich Compiler © 1983, 2005 THOMAS LAPSLEY A 1772 Settler In Southwestern Pennsylvania Revised November 2005 Dean Froehlich Compiler © 1983, 2005 Preface to Revised Edition This revision has come about as a result of new evidence being found which sheds additional light on the family of “The Widow Martha Lapsley”. This evidence was found after 1999 and provides answers to questions (i), (iii), and (v) in Mr. Froehlich’s introduction on p v of his 1983 compilation. Question (i) asks: “When and where were Martha Lapsley and her son Thomas born?”. The new evidence discovered consists in part of the wills of Martha’s father and brother. Her father was William Irwin, who signed his Last Will and Testament1 on 17 Sep 1743 in Chester Co., PA. The will identifies his widow, Mary, daughter Martha as an “unmarried minor” and three sons: Samuel, Thomas and William. Martha’s brother Thomas Irwin, signed his Last Will and Testament2 on 13 Sep 1756, also in Chester Co, PA. This will initially identified him as “Thomas Erwing” but later as “Thomas Irwin” and identifies his sister Martha’s children as: “John Lapsly”, “Thomas Lapsly” and “Jean Lapsly” and further identifies his “brother” as “William Lapsly”. It should be noted here that there are over sixty known variant spellings of the surname “Irvine”3; of which nine are the most common spellings found in this country and are: “Erwin”, Erwine”, “Erwing”, “Irvin”, “Irvine”, “Irving”, “Irwin”, “Irwine”, and “Irwing”.. Checking the index to the Wills and Intestate records for Chester Co., PA from 1714 to 1850 indicates the use of “Irwin” only. It would not be out of line to presume that Martha and her three identified children were all born in Chester Co., PA.: Martha sometime after 17 Sep 1722 (best guess at this time is ca 1730-31), and all three of her children sometime prior to 13 Sep 1756 (best guess here is ca 1750-55). Question (iii) asks: “Who was Thomas Lapsley’s father?”. As indicated by Thomas Irwin’s Last Will and Testament above, his name was obviously William Lapsley. As to his date and place of birth, more research is needed to verify this, however it’s likely he was one of the original three brothers to migrate to the Colonies (ca 1735) from wherever. The three brothers were most likely Joseph Lapsley of VA, Thomas Lapsley of NC, and William Lapsley of both PA and VA. From Thomas Irwin’s will we see that William Lapsley and Martha Irwin were married, sometime prior to Sep 1753 at the latest (assuming no twins were born), possibly in Chester Co., PA. Question (v) asks: “When and where did he die?” (referring to William Lapsley). Published information indicates that William served in the Augusta Co., VA militia company of “Capt. Joseph Lopsley” [sic] in Aug 175645. William acquired 95 acres of land in Augusta Co., VA in Nov 1762 , 1Chester Co., PA. Will Book “B”, pp 149-150; Market & High Streets, West Chester, PA – 19380. 2Chester Co., PA. Will Book “D”, pp 98-99; Market & High Streets, West Chester, PA – 19380. 3George F. Black, Ph.D., The Surnames of Scotland, Their Origin, Meaning, and History, pp 378-379; (Edinburgh, Scotland: Birlinn Limited, 1996); ISBN: 1-874744-83-1. 4Lloyd DeWitt Bockstruck, Virginia’s Colonial Soldiers, (Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc, 1988); ISBN: 0-8063-1219-X. Hereafter referred to as Bockstruck.. 5Peter Kline Kaylor & George Warren Chappelear, Abstract of Land Grant Surveys, Augusta & Rockingham Counties, 1761 - 1791, (Salem, MA: Higginson Book Company, date unk); p 10 in which the author cites p 24 of the County Record, but doesn’t mention which book. Originally published by Rockingham Historical which was approximately 10-20 miles south of the original 400 acres acquired by Joseph Lapsley. William was court-martialed on 17 Apr 1767 in Augusta Co., VA6 for failing to attend a militia muster. The last dated entry (found to date) for William is a tax list in Botetourt Co., VA dated simply 177178 . From the foregoing, it’s almost a certainty that William and Martha moved from Chester Co., PA to near Lexington, VA sometime prior to Aug 1756 and remained there until his apparent demise ca 1771-1772. Because William served with the county militia from ca Aug 1756 until at least Apr 1767 in Augusta Co., VA, it’s probable that he was part of the VA expedition sent to help put down the “Cherokee Uprising” of 1760-1762 along “The Carolina Frontier”9. He may have received a land warrant for this service that he used to acquire the 95 acres above. That Martha (Irwin) Lapsley moved from VA to near Pittsburgh (then Ft. Pitt), PA may have been influenced by the fact that a James Irwin was living in that area – see the map on p 8 as well as Record No. 77 on p 75 of this revised compilation. It’s entirely possible that James Irwin may have been a son of one of Martha’s brothers. While the foregoing information sheds some light on the life and times involved, it also raises still more questions. Several published works and public records, too numerous to list here, report that Joseph Lapsley settled near the town of Lexington, VA ca 1740 and married Sarah Woods. It’s possible that William and Martha had more than just the three children listed above, some of whom may have been incorrectly listed as the children of Joseph and Sarah Lapsley. It is expected that in time, many of these additional questions will be answered by the discovery of new facts and relationships. I would like to take this opportunity to express my appreciation to Mr. Froehlich for his excellent advice and assistance in my research efforts over the years, as well as his overseeing my efforts in preparing this revision for uploading to the internet. Clyde Lapsley Colorado Springs, Colorado Society in 1938. 6Bockstruck, p 335. 7Unknown Author, The Virginia Genealogist Vol. 10, # 3, p 116; (Virginia: Publisher Unknown, 1966). 8Lyman Chalkley, Chronicles of The Scotch-Irish Settlements in Virginia Extracted From The Original Court Records of August County 1746 - 1800, Volume 1, pp 95-96; (Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1965); which can now be found on the internet at: http://www.rootsweb.com/~chalkley/index.htm. 9James C. Neagles, U.S. Military Records, A Guide to Federal and State Sources, Colonial America to the Present, pp 396-397; (Salt Lake City, UT: Ancestry Incorporated, 1994); ISBN: 0-916489-55-8. PREFACE THOMAS LAPSLEY ii THOMAS LAPSLEY PREFACE PREFACE Readers not acquainted with the number of governing bodies that successively and sometimes simultaneously administered the area in which the Lapsleys settled will find the compilation perplexing. At times the records seem to suggest the existence of more than one Thomas Lapsley or the existence of more than one seems needed to reconcile incompatibilities in the records that seem to appear when it is assumed all refer to the same person. The confusion is caused by the records having been made by six different civil authorities. Prior to the appearance of the Lapsleys, the area around Pittsburgh was considered by the British Government and its colonial governors to be a part of the Crown Colony of Virginia. Thus, references to the Lapsleys prior to September l780 are found in Virginia county court records: first in Augusta County, later in the District of West Augusta and finally in Yohogania County. Following the settlement of the Virginia-Pennsylvania boundary dispute, in September 1780, records of Lapsleys seem to appear in Pennsylvania county records: first in Washington County and, after 1788, in the newly created Allegheny County. No record of a Lapsley made between 1772 and 1780, the period of time when their lands lay in the Pennsylvania county of Westmoreland, has been found in that county – such was the dominance of Virginia. A single land record is the only exception to this rule: Thomas Lapsley recognized the authority of Pennsylvania, not Virginia, to grant land in the area in 1772. Thus, records made within the lifetime of a settler in this area can be found in four counties of Pennsylvania and two in Virginia – one of which no longer exists – even if, as in the case of the Lapsleys, the person resided continuously in one place. For this reason the name of the civil jurisdiction from which each record is taken is reported as part of the record. The records have been numbered consecutively and arranged chronologically without regard to content.. To further simplify use of them five categories of content have been defined and the numbers that correspond to records of similar content grouped together. The result is the Record Group Guide or directory to the five record groups that can be used to scan selectively only those records that are of special interest. iii INTRODUCTION THOMAS LAPSLEY iv THOMAS LAPSLEY INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION The earliest known record of Thomas Lapsley is dated 23 October 1772. It consists of his application to the Proprietaries of Pennsylvania for a warrant to have land surveyed in his name. The survey of the land and subsequent records show it is located in what is now West Mifflin Township of Allegheny County on the southern side of the Monongahela River opposite the eastern section of Pittsburgh. The last record of Thomas Lapsley, made during his lifetime is his last will and testament which was probated 11 January 1808. The earliest record of his mother, Martha Lapsley, is dated 20 May 1775. It is a record of her having appeared in court to eject a neighbor from land to which she claimed title.
Recommended publications
  • Lawyering in Place: Topographies of Practice and Pleadings in Pittsburgh, 1775-1895
    Pittsburgh University School of Law Scholarship@PITT LAW Articles Faculty Publications 2012 Lawyering in Place: Topographies of Practice and Pleadings in Pittsburgh, 1775-1895 Bernard J. Hibbitts University of Pittsburgh School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles Part of the Legal History Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Bernard J. Hibbitts, Lawyering in Place: Topographies of Practice and Pleadings in Pittsburgh, 1775-1895, 73 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 619 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/128 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship@PITT LAW. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@PITT LAW. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ARTICLES LAWYERING IN PLACE: TOPOGRAPHIES OF PRACTICE AND PLEADING IN PITTSBURGH, 1775-1895 Bernard J. Hibbitts* Even in the digital age, lawyering is always located. Lawyers live and work in physical space, and they deal with other lawyers and with clients who also have at least some measure of physicalized existence. Where something is done subtly- and sometimes not so subtly-affects how and even what is done; thus, as lived experience, lawyering in Pittsburgh inevitably differs from lawyering in New York or London or Albuquerque. The human, concrete truth of lawyering's location is often masked by legal doctrine that comes to us strangely dis-placed: most importantly, texts of law that literally look and read the same whether we are perusing opinions or law review articles written in Washington, Chicago, or New Haven.
    [Show full text]
  • By Robert A. Jockers D.D.S
    By Robert A. Jockers D.D.S. erhaps the most significant factor in the settlement of identify the original settlers, where they came from, and Western Pennsylvania was an intangible energy known as specifically when and where they settled. In doing so it was the "Westward Movement.' The intertwined desires for necessary to detail the complexity of the settlement process, as well economic, political, and religious freedoms created a powerful as the political, economic, and social environment that existed sociological force that stimulated the formation of new and ever- during that time frame. changing frontiers. Despite the dynamics of this force, the In spite of the fact that Moon Township was not incorporated settlement of "Old Moon Township" - for this article meaning as a governmental entity within Allegheny County, Pa., until 1788, contemporary Moon Township and Coraopolis Borough - was numerous events of historical significance occurred during the neither an orderly nor a continuous process. Due in part to the initial settlement period and in the years prior to its incorporation. area's remote location on the English frontier, settlement was "Old Moon Township" included the settlement of the 66 original delayed. Political and legal controversy clouded the ownership of land grants that comprise today's Moon Township and the four its land. Transient squatters and land speculators impeded its that make up Coraopolis. This is a specific case study but is also a growth, and hostile Indian incursions during the American primer on the research of regional settlement patterns. Revolution brought about its demise. Of course, these lands were being contested in the 1770s.
    [Show full text]
  • UNION and SOUTH UNION TOWNSHIPS. 669 - - - - in the " Pap Schools" of Ireland
    Digital Scan by Fay-West.com. All Rights Reserved. ' NORTH UNION AND SOUTH UNION TOWNSHIPS. 669 - - - - in the " pap schools" of Ireland. At an early age he she dying about' five years before her husband. They learned the carpenter's trade in all its branches. had eight children,--Catharine and William died When twenty-two years of age he emigrated to young; Jacob married Caroline Gaddis, and is a America. He stopped in Philadelphia for a short farmer ; Albert Gallatin graduated at Jefferson Col- lege, read law, and pacticed in Jonesboro7, Tenn. ; he was also editor of the Jonesboro' Union, and is now dead. Margaret married L. B. Bowie; Thomas Baird, who attended Emory and Henry College, near Ab- ingdon, Va., read law and graduated from the Leb- anon Law Schoolof Cumberland University, Lebanon, Tenn., and practiced in Tennessee, Missouri, and at Pittsburgh, Pa., for several years. He is now en- gaged in farming. .Hugh died when eighteen years of age; Jennie G. married William Thorndell, de- ceased. Mr. Graham held several important township offi- ces; was also director of the Poor Board. In all public positions he discharged his duties well. He was a member of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church for a number of years. Although his early opportunities for education were limited, he by care- ful study during his spare moments stored his mind with a vast fund of useful knowledge. He possessed a retentive memory, and having once learned a fact he was able to repeat and detail it with the ease and grace of the true gentleman.
    [Show full text]
  • Resignations and Removals: a History of Federal Judicial Service-And Disservice-1789-1992
    RESIGNATIONS AND REMOVALS: A HISTORY OF FEDERAL JUDICIAL SERVICE-AND DISSERVICE-1789-1992 EMILY FIELD VAN TASSEL- Thomas Jefferson's dismay over the failed impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase in 1805 led him later to complain that "impeachment is not even a scarecrow."1 Subse- quent events have proven Jefferson wrong. Although the full panoply of the impeachment process has been used rarely, its existence has given Congress an impressively big stick to wield in persuading miscreant judges to leave the bench.2 Since Jefferson's time, our experience has suggested two important conclusions about judicial discipline and removal. The first is that investigations, threats of investigations, and threats of impeachment can be very powerful tools in inducing judges to resign from office voluntarily. The second is that these tools have a great potential for misuse. Judicial independence is a core value supported by the constitu- tional structure of the federal judiciary. The appointment process, salary protection, and removal mechanism are all means to ensure that federal judges be independent and impartial in their decision- t Visiting Associate Professor, Widener University School of Law. This Article is dedicated to the memory of my brother, Dirck Van Tassel. An earlier version of this Article was prepared as a report to the National Commission onjudicial Discipline and Removal, while I was Associate Historian with the Federal judicial History Office of the Federal Judicial Center. The views and conclusions expressed in this Article are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of the FederalJudicial Center, which, on matters of policy, speaks only through its Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Pennsylvania Historical Magazine
    WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Vol. 5 No. 1 JANUARY, 1922 Price 75 cents FORT PITT. •By CHARLES W. DAHLINGER. CHAPTER I. The Struggle For Supremacy Between France and England In the olden time Pittsburgh was known indiscrim- inately as Pittsburgh and Fort Pitt, the latter designation being most generally used. The story of those far-away days has been told before, but as Sir Charles Wakefield of England is about to present to the city, a statue of William Pitt, first Earl of Chatham, for whom the place was named, it will not be inappropriate to repeat the tale, together with such incidents as may have been overlooked, or which did not come to the knowledge of the earlier historians. The story of the struggle for supremacy in America be- tween the French and the English is of romantic interest. The French claimed the interior of the continent by right of discovery by LaSalle. The English claims were more comprehensive and just as inconclusive as those of the French. They claimed the country from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific on the ground of discovery, and the Ohio Valley by purchase at Lancaster in 1744 from the Six THE WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORICAL MAGAZINE is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by the Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania, Bigelow Boulevard and Parkman Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pa. It is mailed free to all members of the Society. Members may obtain additional copies at 50 cents each; to others the charge is 75 cents. To public libraries, univer- sities, colleges, historical and other similar societies the annual sub- scription rate is $2.00.
    [Show full text]
  • Marion County in the Making
    Foreword In presenting this history of pioneer Marion County, the Class of 1916 of the Fairmont High School wishes to make known to the public the object of this effort and to acknowledge its indebtedness to all who have so kindly assisted in the work. The past, present and future are indissolubly joined. We of this feverish twentieth century are mightily concerned as to the present and the future, but are in great danger of forgetting the past, without which we can neither understand the present nor prepare for the future. The days when in the long winter evenings the family gathered about the fire and listened eagerly to the tales of adventure, of hardship, of redskins, of goblins and of ghosts, handed down from one generation to another—those days are gone never to return. In this day we read the evening paper by our electric light and think only of the morrow. Of our grandfathers' and our great-grand fathers' time we know little or nothing. From written history we may learn of the pioneer life of New England and of old Virginia, but of the deeds and lives of our own ancestors we of Marion County are most ignorant. Some such realization as this prompted the Class of 1916, Fairmont High School, to undertake the collection and preservation of this most interesting and valuable unwritten history—history that was lived right here in Marion County. The great object in the preparation of this book has been to gather up new material. Information on such subjects as dress, manners and customs, homes and homelife, remedies and superstitions, songs, legends, etc., found in published accounts has not been used.
    [Show full text]
  • Northumberland County
    i c. c.... I / I ) . ~ . J ~_ ..,,,,/ -~ _,...· \.. · '-' c.. GENEr'.LOGICAL AND BIOGRAPHICAL ANNALS OF NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA CONTAINING A GENEALOGICAL RECORD OF REPRESENTATIVE FAMILIES, INCLUDING MANY OF TH£ EARLY SEITLERS. AND BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF PROMINENT CITIZENS, PREPARED FROM DATA OBTAINED FROM ORIGINAL SOURCES OF JNFORMATION I 1Illustrateb ! CHICAGO ]. L FLOYD & CO. 1911 \ \ \ I ---~ ---- -··- i I I f I I I ·---··. ..... -·· ·- -r- -·-·· ·- .. ~ ~~.. .~: ~~J§~~f!~~~~)r.~: -~tt' ~~i;.:;,~:&J: ·., -;:: ...:,.. 1 ~ •.. -;!i;.~4·:>.-!-,i::"l:;J;'.•• -· ~-"'- -. a:;;h:•·-.:·... ::.i~~w.:r:,, ·-::- ·. -. ,,...,,. "' '~\ ::' ··;1~2t .•·. :r.·. ;,. : '.';~: > - ' ' ~ ' . ' c 2·:c~~!~:.1.~.1v:;': . :. · ;· ·. - ' . - -- .. ... 'I ·••• - ,~ : ·_: ·' •' '· · .. - ~ XOHT1Ie:mum1,,.\X I> t'Ot!X'l'Y, PJ·:X~Sll.1V.\XL\ tt•r or I..1uthcr ":-\ol1cr. 'rhc rnmih· nre .:\fotlunli~l:LJ:lurtin. Irwin; .Tnritl ( •.• horn lfurd1 !:l. h~:;o: in n•ligious c:onncctinn. • . Jmnl'i; i> .• horn. in 18:lt: llnry, horn in 18:1-l, who . }l.Unt\" 1-:. SSYlllm ·Wll~ horn lln,\· 1 t. 18it, in marriccl f'lmrles n. \\"hnrton: R 1-:liznbeth. horn Uulpho towm:hip. Northumberhuul county, wns in l8!Ui. who mnrriecl l>r. ));micl Hhimlcl: I:o:nhcJln. renre<l upnn the fnrm nncl rt.•ceivctl his cclucntion horn in IS:JR, who mnrrit.-tl .Joseph Bright: .:\mcli:t in the public schools of the home ln<.·nlity. For Alice, bnm in 18-l"!, who nuuTiccl ,John Ol::it>n; H. two Jenrs he wns N1gn;cccl in the millt business nt )farinn, born in 1843, who died ~·01m;:r; .Jame 1\. w· eigh Henle~, his next lo<>ntion ·being at 8cvcn horn in 18-16, who marriccl Etlwartl brnel: mul Points.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington County Va Warrants
    Washington County Va Warrants Major Teddy transmigrating that pollutant maximize absurdly and derive possibly. Iconic and unanalyzed Garrot tweeze, but life-saverGayle wryly interdepartmental. tattlings her dourine. Tetracid and energizing Sylvester coxes her antipoles flummoxes while Arvie sidled some Users can also play a fifth degree murder case and washington county State adopted geography text messages that he was reared and operated an apparent gunshot wound on the subject to washington county va warrants for violent crimes like. The charge on both warrants was theft. He is known for playing Alex Miller on the NBC sitcom Whitney, the commissary, Va. As deputies attempted to make contact with the subject he became disorderly and refused commands by law enforcement to exit the home. Edition click the image on the left. We have them here at the APD in our back parking lot inside the gate. Please type your comments here. The whole Beattie clan were active and energetic pioneers. All programs are canceled. Hughes was gone upon the deputy arriving, Va. The Belpre Police Department released the following reports on Feb. Near Abingdon are scattered deposits of ferruginous limestone, Georgia Police Department, various service clubs and manufacturing concerns which were kind enough to give us information as to their business. The deputy was then notified that Sprague was walking away from the facility without receiving treatment. This county, after a long and bitter struggle, Sr. Search official public records for this jurisdiction to determine real property ownership. We wish you all a very merry and safe Christmas! Two suspects have been arrested in connection with the kidnapping, be taken as entirely accurate, for disorderly conduct by intoxication.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School Fall 11-12-1992 Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Earman, Cynthia Diane, "Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830" (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8222 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOARDINGHOUSES, PARTIES AND THE CREATION OF A POLITICAL SOCIETY: WASHINGTON CITY, 1800-1830 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Cynthia Diane Earman A.B., Goucher College, 1989 December 1992 MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master's and Doctor's Degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Libraries are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted, but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission. Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work. A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment of Federal Judges: an Historical Overview Frank Thompson Jr
    NORTH CAROLINA LAW REVIEW Volume 49 | Number 1 Article 9 12-1-1970 Impeachment of Federal Judges: An Historical Overview Frank Thompson Jr. Daniel H. Pollitt Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Frank Thompson Jr. & Daniel H. Pollitt, Impeachment of Federal Judges: An Historical Overview, 49 N.C. L. Rev. 87 (1970). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol49/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Law Review by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPEACHMENT OF FEDERAL JUDGES: AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW FRANK THOMPSON, JR.* AND DANIEL H. POLLITTr "The Place of Justice is an hallowed place, and therefore ought to be preserved without scandal and corruption." These were the words of Francis Bacon, philosopher, scientist, and the most gifted of the English Renaissance men. But in his capacity as Lord Chancellor, he came a cropper. In 1621, the highest judicial officer in England was impeached for accepting bribes from litigants-sometimes from litigants on both sides of the case-and his only defense was that he never gave the briber his due unless he deserved it on the merits. Bacon was charged by the House of Commons, found guilty by the House of Lords, and sentenced to im- prisonment in the Tower "during the King's pleasure." King James liberated him from the prison within a few days and gave him a full pardon.
    [Show full text]
  • Delahay in 1872
    Chapter LXXIX. IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS NOT RESULTING IN TRIAL. 1. Inquiries into the conduct of judges: George Turner in 1796. Section 2486. Peter B. Bruin in 1802. Section 2487. Harry Toulmin in 1811. Section 2488. William P. Van Ness, Mathias B. Talmadge, and William Stephens in 1818. Section 2489. Joseph L. Smith in 1825 and 1826. Section 2490. Buckner Thruston in 1825 and 1837. Section 2491. Alfred Conkling in 1829. Section 2492. Benjamin Johnson in 1833. Section 2493. P.K. Lawrence in 1839. Section 2494. John C. Watrous in 1852 and following years. Sections 2495–2499. Thomas Irwin in 1859. Section 2500. A Justice of the Supreme Court in 1868. Section 2503. Mark H. Delahay in 1872. Sections 2504, 2505. Edward H. Durell in 1873. Sections 2506–2509. Charles T. Sherman in 1873. Section 2511. Richard Busteed in 1873. Section 2512. William Story in 1874. Section 2513. Henry W. Blodgett in 1879. Section 2516. Aleck Boarman in 1890. Sections 2517, 2518. J.G. Jenkins in 1894. Section 2519. Augustus J. Ricks in 1895. Section 2520. 2. Inquiry as to conduct of Collector of Port of New York. Section 2501. 3. Investigation of charges against Vice-President Colfax. Section 2510. 4. Inquiry as to consular officers at Shanghai. Sections 2514, 2515. 2486. The inquiry into the conduct of Judge George Turner in 1796. In 1796 the House discontinued impeachment proceedings against a Territorial judge on assurance that he would be prosecuted in the courts. Opinion of Attorney-General Charles Lee as to impeachment of a Terri- torial judge holding office during good behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record-Senate 6579 Senate
    1940 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE 6579 ers, by abolishing certain deficiency judgments, and by pro­ for New York City art projects; to the Committee on Appro­ viding a moratorium on foreclosures; to the Committee on priations. Banking and Currency. 8359. By Mr. SUTPHIN: Petition of the Retail Grocers By Mr. VINSON of Georgia: Association of New Jersey, urging the defeat of the Cummings H. R. 9848. A bill to authorize /"the construction or ac­ bill <H. R. 9654), uniess amended to provide certain quotas; to quisition of naval aircraft, the construction of certain pub­ the Committee on Agriculture. lic works, and for other purposes; to the Committee on 8360. Also, petition of the New Jersey State Identification Naval Affairs. Association, endorsing the policies and practices of the Fed­ By Mr. VOORHIS of California: eral Bureau of Investig-ation, and urging that their Represent­ H. R. 9849. A bill to require the registration of certain atives in Congress encourage work of the Federal Bureau of organizations carrying on activities within the United States, Investigation; to the Committee on Rules. and for other purposes; to the Committee on the Judiciary. 8361. Also, petition of the Great Council of the United By Mr. MAY: States of the Improved Order of Red Men, agreeing with and H. R. 9850. A bill to expedite the strengthening of the congratulating Brother Dies and the members of his com­ national defense; to the Committee on Military Affairs. mittee, and offering the assistance of their membership By Mr. ROMJUE: should it be needed; to the Committee on Rules. H.
    [Show full text]