6Xsuhph &Rxuw Ri Wkh 8Qlwhg 6Wdwhv

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

6Xsuhph &Rxuw Ri Wkh 8Qlwhg 6Wdwhv 1R ,17+( 6XSUHPH&RXUWRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV ²²²²²² 0255,6&2817<%2$5'2)&+26(1)5((+2/'(567+( 0255,6&2817<35(6(59$7,2175867)81'5(9,(: %2$5'-26(3+$.29$/&,.-5,1+,62)),&,$/ &$3$&,7<$60255,6&2817<75($685(5 3HWLWLRQHUV Y )5(('20)5205(/,*,21)281'$7,21$1' '$9,'67(.(7(( 5HVSRQGHQWV ²²²²²² 213(7,7,21)25:5,72)&(57,25$5,727+( 6835(0(&28572)7+(67$7(2)1(:-(56(< BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB %5,()2)$0,&86&85,$( 1$7,21$/75867)25+,6725,&35(6(59$7,21 ,168332572)3(7,7,21(56 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 7+$''(86+(8(5 (/,=$%(7+60(55,77 &RXQVHORI5HFRUG 1$7,21$/75867)25 $1'5(:/21'21 +,6725,&35(6(59$7,21 5$&+(/+87&+,1621 9,5*,1,$$9(1: )2/(<+2$*//3 68,7( 6HDSRUW%RXOHYDUG :$6+,1*721'& %RVWRQ0$ HPHUULWW#VDYLQJSODFHVRUJ WKHXHU#IROH\KRDJFRP 2FWREHU i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................... iii INTERESTS OF AMICUS CURIAE ......................... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................... 2 ARGUMENT .............................................................. 5 I. PRESERVING HISTORIC RELIGIOUS STRUCTURES IS AN ISSUE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE ........................... 6 A. Protecting Historical and Architectural Heritage—both Secular and Religious—is a Legitimate Government Interest for Cultural, Aesthetic, and Economic Reasons ............................................................ 6 B. Governments Have a Legitimate Interest in Promoting the Historical, Architectural, and Cultural Heritage of Religious Structures ...................................................... 10 C. Federal, State, and Local Governments Regularly Fund the Preservation of Historic Religious Structures to Advance Secular Public Benefits ................................. 16 II. STATE COURTS ARE SPLIT ON WHETHER HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANTS ARE A PUBLIC BENEFIT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF TRINITY LUTHERAN .................................................. 21 ii CONCLUSION ......................................................... 27 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases American Atheists, Inc. v. City of Detroit Downtown Dev. Auth., 567 F.3d 278 (6th Cir. 2009) ................ 3, 19, 25, 26 Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954) ..................................................8 Caplan v. Town of Acton, 92 N.E.3d 691 (Ma. 2018) ........................... 2, 23, 24 Everson v. Board of Educ., 330 U.S. 1 (1947) ....................................................7 Freedom From Religion Found. v. Morris County Bd. of Chosen Freeholders, 181 A.3d 992 (N.J. 2018) .............................. 2, 3, 23 New Orleans v. Dukes, 427 U.S. 297 (1976) ................................................8 Penn Cent. Transp. Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978) .................................... 4, 6, 7, 8 Taylor v. Town of Cabot, 178 A.3d 313 (Vt. 2017) .................................... 3, 25 Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, 137 S. Ct. 2012 (2017) .................................. passim Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005) .............................................. 19 iv Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002) .............................................. 19 Statutory Authorities 54 U.S.C. §300101 ...................................................7, 9 54 U.S.C. § 312102(a) ........................................ 1, 5, 21 Historic Sites Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 666, §1 ...............7 Pub. L. No. 89-665, 80 Stat. 915 ............................. 8, 9 Additional Authorities Authority of the Department of the Interior to Provide Historic Preservation Grants to Historic Religious Properties Such as the Old North Church, 27 OP. O.L.C. 91 (Apr. 30, 2003) ............ 18 Peter Benes, MEETINGHOUSES OF EARLY NEW ENGLAND 13 (2012) ................................................ 11 Patricia L. Brown, Beacons of Faith Are Dimming on the Prairie, N.Y. TIMES (Jul. 7, 2002) ................... 11 Diane Cohen & A. Robert Jaeger, Sacred Places at Risk (1998), https://sacredplaces.org/uploads/files/ 395429189155295863-spar.pdf (accessed Oct. 15, 2018) ....................... 10, 13, 14, 15 Colorado Historical Foundation, The Economic Benefits of Historic Preservation in Colorado (2002) .....................................................................12 v Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation, Funding Opportunities, https://www.cttrust.org/current-funding (accessed Oct. 15, 2018) .........................................................20 Hunter S. Edwards, The Guide for Future Preservation in Historic Districts Using a Creative Approach: Charleston, South Carolina’s Contextual Approach to Historic Preservation, 20 U. FLA.J.L.&PUB.POL’Y 221 (2009) ............... 11 Sara C. Galvan, Rehabilitating Rehab Through State Building Codes, 115 YALE L.J. 1744 (2006) .......................................6 Oscar S. Gray, The Response of Federal Legislation to Historic Preservation, 36 LAW &CONTEMP. PROBS. 314 (1971) ....................................................8 History Colorado, Grants & Financial Incentives, https://www.historycolorado.org/grants-financial- incentives (accessed Oct. 18, 2018) .........................9 Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Grant To Preserve Local History Across State, http://www.in.gov/activecalendar_dnr/EventList.as px?view=EventDetails&eventidn=16251&informat ion_id=36996 (accessed October 18, 2018) ........... 16 Institute of Museum & Library Services, $4.8 Million in Grants Go to “Save America’s Treasures” (Sept. 21, 2018), https://www.imls.gov/news-events/news- releases/48-million-grants-go-save-americas- treasures (accessed Oct. 18, 2018) .................... 9, 19 vi Massachusetts Historical Commission, Massachusetts Preservation Projects Fund, https://www.sec.state.ma.us/mhc/mhcmppf/mppfid x.htm (accessed Oct. 17, 2018) .............................. 10 Thompson Mayes, Introduction: Why Do Old Places Matter?, 29 FORUM J. 7 (2015) ................................6 National Main Street Center, Main Street Impact, https://www.mainstreet.org/mainstreetimpact (accessed Oct. 15, 2018) ......................................... 12 National Trust for Historic Preservation, America’s Most Endangered Historic Places—Past Listings, https://savingplaces.org/11most-past- listings#.WXNGHYjytW8 (accessed Oct. 11, 2018) ......................................... 15 Partners for Sacred Places, The Economic Halo Effect, https://sacredplaces.org/uploads/files/16879092466 251061-economic-halo-effect-of-historic-sacred- places.pdf (accessed Oct. 15, 2018) ....................... 13 Partners for Sacred Places, States Providing Funding to Historic Religious Properties, 1 SACRED PLACES, no. 3, 2004, http://www.sacredplaces.org/uploads/files/9355734 95915362585-sacred-places-vol-1-no-3.pdf (accessed Oct. 18, 2018) ......................................... 20 Michael Paulson, Historic Trust Lists Catholic Churches, BOSTON GLOBE (June 5, 2005) ............ 16 vii Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission, Keystone Historic Preservation Construction Grants, http://www.phmc.pa.gov/preservation/grants- funding/pages/construction-projects.aspx#6 (accessed Oct. 18, 2018) ......................................... 20 Press Release, National Park Service Announces Over $7.5 Million in Grants To Preserve African American Civil Rights Movement Sites, Nat’l Park Serv. (Jan. 12, 2017) https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1207/01-12-2017-civil- rights-grants.htm .................................................. 19 Holly H. Roberts, SYNAGOGUES OF MANHATTAN,NEW YORK (2013)............................................................11 Donovan D. Rypkema, THE ECONOMICS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION (2d ed. 2005) ............................ 11, 12 Save America’s Treasures Awards 1999-2010 By State, available at https://tinyurl.com/SATStateAwards (accessed Oct. 18, 2018) .........................................................19 Secretary of the Commonwealth’s Office, Massachusetts Preservation Project Fund Grant Recipients, https://www.sec.state.ma.us/mhc/mhcmppf/mppf- recipients.htm (accessed Oct. 18, 2018) ................ 16 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (2017), https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/treatment- guidelines-2017.pdf (accessed Oct. 14, 2018) ....... 14 viii Texas Historical Commission, Texas Preservation Trust Fund, http://www.thc.texas.gov/preserve/projects-and- programs/texas-preservation-trust-fund (accessed Oct. 15, 2018) .........................................................10 INTERESTS OF AMICUS CURIAE 1 The National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States (the “National Trust”) is a privately funded nonprofit organization, chartered by Congress in 1949 to further the historic preservation policies of the United States and to “facilitate public participation” in the preservation of our nation’s heritage. 54 U.S.C. § 312102(a). With more than one million members and supporters nationwide, the National Trust works to protect significant historic sites and advocate for historic preservation as a fundamental value in programs and policies at all levels of government. This includes legal advocacy to uphold the integrity of federal, state, and local laws and governmental decisions that help to protect our nation’s historic places. In carrying out its mission, the National Trust has participated as a party or amicus curiae in hundreds of cases in federal and state courts since 1970. During its long history, the National Trust has worked to help preserve numerous historic religious structures across the country. These places include the Old North Church in Boston, Massachusetts; Bok Kai Temple in Marysville, California;
Recommended publications
  • Places in Peril See Page 4 Letter from Sarah Hansen, Executive Director Preservation Updates
    WINTER 2020 n VOL. 45, NO. 1 LANDMARKS OBSERVER Historic character enriches our lives WHO WE ARE: Rachel Ambrose SEE PAGE 8 SUMMER IN REVIEW SEE PAGE 11 PLACES IN PERIL SEE PAGE 4 LETTER FROM SARAH HANSEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PRESERVATION UPDATES Sarah atop a giant modating new development and the needs of contemporary life. bunny at Henry’s Greater Portland continues to face significant development pres- Rabbit Ranch on sures. We strongly believe that balance is essential on any path historic Route 66, Illinois forward. We have a responsibility to protect what we know to be meaningful chapters in our story. We do this as we continue to look for solutions to challenges presented by development, a changing climate, and our region’s need for inclusive housing solutions. I see our work as an opportunity to celebrate our home’s vibrancy: its unique neighborhoods, small businesses and new residents; to advocate for smart preservation policy through- out the region; to foster thoughtful discussion about climate change impacts, quality of place, and affordable housing; and BY JULIE LARRY outside the district’s boundaries. Throughout the designation to tell the rich social, cultural, and architectural story of greater OR THE PAST TWO YEARS, Greater Portland process, Portland has successfully balanced the preservation of Portland. We’ll do this through collaboration and balance. Landmarks has partnered with local residents to advocate historic resources with economic growth and the development of We’ll do this together. n for a Munjoy Hill historic district to manage change and new housing units. The proposed historic district will conserve Many, many thanks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Business Model of Unitarian and Congregational Religious Societies in Northern New England, 1790-1850
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2021 Pews, Proprietors, and Plutocracy: The Business Model of Unitarian and Congregational Religious Societies in Northern New England, 1790-1850 Amy Beth Smith University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Smith, Amy Beth, "Pews, Proprietors, and Plutocracy: The Business Model of Unitarian and Congregational Religious Societies in Northern New England, 1790-1850" (2021). Doctoral Dissertations. 2595. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2595 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pews, Proprietors, and Plutocracy: The Business Model of Unitarian and Congregational Religious Societies in Northern New England, 1790-1850 BY Amy Beth Smith B.A., Saint Joseph’s College, 1999 M.S. Ed., University of Southern Maine, 2003 M.A., University of New Hampshire, 2015 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History May, 2021 All RIGHTS RESERVED © 2021 Amy Beth Smith ii iii This dissertation has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in History by: Dissertation Director, Jessica M. Lepler, Associate Professor of History Lucy Salyer, Professor of History Cynthia Van Zandt, Associate Professor of History David Bachrach, Professor of History Michael C.
    [Show full text]
  • Martha Epinello Consulting Resume
    Martha E. Pinello Education Keene State College, Non-matriculating Graduate Student 35 credits Education Summer 2006-Fall 2007 University of Massachusetts-Boston, M.A. History/Anthropology, 1989 Concentration in: botany, history, and archaeology University of Vermont, B.A. Anthropology, 1978 Work Experience Principal Investigator Monadnock Archaeological Consulting, LLC . Responsible for design and implementation of data recovery plans for mitigation of historical sites; archival research, site excavation, collection care, site analysis and reporting. 2005 to present. Consultant Providing site examination at the design phase for building and landscape restoration, coordination of archaeological services for project teams. Collection strategies and analysis of botanical remains from historic and Native American sites. Projects include: Abyssinian Meeting House, Portland, ME; The Vale, Waltham, MA, The Codman Estate and Gropius House Lincoln, MA all owned by Historic New England, The Mount, Edith Wharton Restoration, Inc. Lenox, MA. January 1996 to 2005. Project Archaeologist and Co-Principal Investigator , Victoria Bunker, Inc. Responsible for design and implementation of data recovery plans for mitigation of historical sites; archival research, site excavation, collection care, site analysis and reporting. 1983-1996. Chief Archaeologist Strawbery Banke Museum, Inc. Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Director of archaeology program for the 10-acre historic sites museum. Responsible for teaching volunteers and students in public archaeology programs, curation of 30 archaeological sites collection, development of site interpretation with landscape, properties, curatorial and education staff. Directed a staff of professional archaeologists, volunteers, graduate students, and interns. July 1985 to Sept. 2006. Archaeologist National Park Service North Atlantic Regional Office Boston, MA. Survey of Cape Cod Archaeological Survey Wellfleet to Provincetown.
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE for the FUTURE 2021 - 2026 Edition
    HERITAGE FOR THE FUTURE 2021 - 2026 Edition MAINE’S STATEWIDE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN Compiled by State Historic Preservation Office Maine Historic Preservation Commission March 2021 2 A SPECIAL THANKS KEY AUTHORS AND CONTRIBUTORS Elizabeth Muzzey, State Plan Consultant Kirk F. Mohney, Maine Historic Preservation Commission Christi Chapman-Mitchell, Maine Historic Preservation Commission Megan M. Rideout, Maine Historic Preservation Commission A special thanks to those who contributed preservation perspectives to this year’s edition: Bob & Mary Kate Reny Town of Yarmouth Anne Ball James Nyman Travis Ferland PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Anne Ball, Director, Maine Downtown Center Shawn Blodgett, Town Manager, Town of Castine Malcolm Collins, Architect, Member of the Maine Historic Preservation Commission Andrew Deci, Assistant Planner, Town of Topsham Maggie Drummond-Bahl, Senior Program Officer, Maine Community Foundation Gail Gladstone, Cultural Resource Manager, Acadia National Park Sarah Hansen, Executive Director, Greater Portland Landmarks Anne Krieg, City Planner, City of Bangor Cynthia Lamoreau, President, Maine Archaeological Society Greg Paxton, Executive Director, Maine Preservation Kerry Vautrot, Cultural Resources Manager, US Navy, Public Works Department– Maine A very special thanks to those who partnered with Maine Historic Preservation Commission to lead public listening sessions and to those who participated in the 2021 State Plan online survey. Cover photo caption: The Tides Institute & Museum of Art, Eastport 3 Heritage for the Future 2021– 2026 Edition INTRODUCTION 5 THE PLAN FOR THE PLAN 6 EVALUATING EXISTING CONDITIONS 10 VALUES AND VISION 15 OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS 18 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND ACTIONS 25 IMPLEMENTATION 34 BIBLIOGRAPHY 36 APPENDIX I: State Plan Survey 38 APPENDIX II: Incentives and Funding Sources 43 APPENDIX III: State Historic Preservation Office Programs 49 APPENDIX IV: Laws and Regulations 54 4 This publication has been financed in part with federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • The City Is a Classroom Is Now Available to Download for Free by Clicking Here!
    The City is a Classroom A Kid’s Guide to Portland’s Landmarks and History Third Edition The City is a Classroom: A Kid’s Guide to Portland’s Landmarks and History Third Edition 2019 ISBN# 978-0-939761-15-9 © Greater Portland Landmarks, Inc. Portland, Maine 1998, 1999, 2004, 2013, 2019 All Rights Reserved Reprint of the Third Edition generously funded by Norway Savings Bank Third Edition, rewritten and redesigned with generous support from the CPB Foundation and the Leonard C. and Mildred F. Ferguson Foundation Reprint of the Second Edition generously funded by the Rines/Thompson Fund of the Maine Community Foundation Second edition generously funded by the Leonard C. and Mildred F. Ferguson Foundation First Edition made possible by grants from Cole Haan and the Davis Family Foundation Project Director Jennifer Pollick Editor Ruth Townsend Story Graphic Design Ann Casady, Casady Design Cover Artwork Beastfromeast, UK Acknowledgements We are grateful to the Portland Public Schools and the many elementary school teachers from the region who generously gave their time and expertise to rewrite and reformat the text for this edition. In particular, we thank David Galin, Laura Graves, Suzanne Hardy, Barbara Judge, Lynn Medley, Marilyn Philbrook, Cynthia Rotolo, and Mikki van Summern. We also thank our contributing partners, members of the staff and volunteers at the Abyssinian Meeting House, the Fifth Maine Regiment Museum, Friends of Evergreen Cemetery, Maine Historical Society, Maine Narrow Gauge Railroad, Spirits Alive at Eastern Cemetery,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 GREATER PORTLAND Recognized 8 outstanding leaders Forged strong partnerships to Historic Markers get a new look: and projects with Preservation identify and preserve historic » Redesigned LANDMARKS’ mission is Honor Awards resources: Landmarks’ Historic » Preservation Leaders: » Surveyed 242 Buildings in Deering Highlands Marker and program to preserve and revitalize » Marianne Chapman with support from a Historic Preservation review process in » Troy Bennett Grant from the National Park Service. Also order to expand the Greater Portland’s remarkable Boulevard Park, East Deering, Nason’s Corner, program’s reach and Restoration and Rehabilitation Peaks Island and Morrill’s Corner. emphasize more legacy of historic buildings, Projects: modest dwellings » Achieved National Register listing for the alongside the » Conant-Payson Block (1866), 30 Exchange Hawkes Plaza Sign in Westbrook for its grandiose. Printed Street, Portland neighborhoods, landscapes, significance to art and commerce, working on a more durable material, the new design » State Theatre Marquee (1929), 609 Congress with the Westbrook Historical Society and the highlights the context of each structure, giving and parks. Street, Portland Maine Historic Preservation Commission. information about the namesake and includes the architect when possible. With your crucial support we have » Grand Trunk Railroad Office Building (1903), 1 » Partnered with the Munjoy Hill Neighborhood India Street, Portland Organization and the City of Portland to fund a connected more than 25,000 people to the designation report for Munjoy Hill. Trained four future preservation Adaptive Reuse Projects: leaders through our summer internship program, who stories of their homes, neighborhoods and » Brick South (1904), Thompson’s Point, Portland conducted Maine’s first survey communities, encouraging adaptive-use and » The Motherhouse at Baxter Wood (1909), 605 of historic buildings at risk from enhancing greater Portland’s character of Stevens Avenue, Portland climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving African American Historic Places
    Preserving African American Historic Places By Brent Leggs, Kerri Rubman, and Byrd Wood The National Trust for Historic Preservation works to save America’s historic places for the next generation. We take direct, on-the-ground action when historic buildings and sites are threatened. Our work helps build vibrant, sustainable communities. We advocate with governments to save America’s heritage. We strive to create a cultural legacy that is as diverse as the nation itself so that all of us can take pride in our part of the American story. ON THE COVER: The African Meeting House in Boston tells the story of the abolitionist movement in America. Photo: Museum of African American History/Shawmut Design & Construction ABOUT THE AUTHORS: Brent Leggs is a field officer in the National Trust’s Boston Field Office, where he developed the Northeast African American Historic Places Outreach Program. A Harvard Loeb Fellow, he works to build the capacity of volunteer leaders from diverse communities saving places important in American history. Kerri Rubman is a free-lance editor and writer in Calgary, Canada, specializing in historic preservation writing and research. Byrd Wood is content manager at the National Trust in Washington, D.C. The following individuals generously took the time to review drafts and provide invaluable advice, suggestions, and illustrations: Tanya Bowers, Robert Bull, A’Lelia Bundles, Valerie Cunningham, Michael Cogswell, Jeanne Cyriaque, Connie Dyson, Rasheedah El-Amin, Pamela E. Green, Gregory Farmer, Cyrus Forman, Tracy Hayes, GaryJackson, Malina Jeffers, Melissa Jest, Trevor Johnson, Rick Lowe, George McDaniel, Joseph McGill, Shirley McKinney, Beverly Morgan-Welch, Karen Nickless, Wendy Nicholas, Stephen Petranek, Diana Parcon, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving African American Historic Places
    Preserving African American Historic Places By Brent Leggs, Kerri Rubman, and Byrd Wood The National Trust for Historic Preservation works to save America’s historic places for the next generation. We take direct, on-the-ground action when historic buildings and sites are threatened. Our work helps build vibrant, sustainable communities. We advocate with governments to save America’s heritage. We strive to create a cultural legacy that is as diverse as the nation itself so that all of us can take pride in our part of the American story. ON THE COVER: The African Meeting House in Boston tells the story of the abolitionist movement in America. Photo: Museum of African American History/Shawmut Design & Construction ABOUT THE AUTHORS: Brent Leggs is a field officer in the National Trust’s Boston Field Office, where he developed the Northeast African American Historic Places Outreach Program. A Harvard Loeb Fellow, he works to build the capacity of volunteer leaders from diverse communities saving places important in American history. Kerri Rubman is a free-lance editor and writer in Calgary, Canada, specializing in historic preservation writing and research. Byrd Wood is content manager at the National Trust in Washington, D.C. The following individuals generously took the time to review drafts and provide invaluable advice, suggestions, and illustrations: Tanya Bowers, Robert Bull, A’Lelia Bundles, Valerie Cunningham, Michael Cogswell, Jeanne Cyriaque, Connie Dyson, Rasheedah El-Amin, Pamela E. Green, Gregory Farmer, Cyrus Forman, Tracy Hayes, GaryJackson, Malina Jeffers, Melissa Jest, Trevor Johnson, Rick Lowe, George McDaniel, Joseph McGill, Shirley McKinney, Beverly Morgan-Welch, Karen Nickless, Wendy Nicholas, Stephen Petranek, Diana Parcon, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Writing in the Campaign Against Slavery in the United States
    The Politics of Correspondence: Letter Writing in the Campaign Against Slavery in the United States Mary Tibbetts Freeman Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 Ó 2018 Mary Tibbetts Freeman All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Politics of Correspondence: Letter Writing in the Campaign Against Slavery in the United States Mary Tibbetts Freeman The abolitionists were a community of wordsmiths whose political movement took shape in a sea of printed and handwritten words. These words enabled opponents of slavery in the nineteenth-century United States to exert political power, even though many of them were excluded from mainstream politics. Women and most African Americans could not vote, and they faced violent reprisals for speaking publicly. White men involved in the antislavery cause frequently spurned party politics, using writing as a key site of political engagement. Reading and writing allowed people from different backgrounds to see themselves as part of a political collective against slavery. “The Politics of Correspondence” examines how abolitionists harnessed the power of the written word to further their political aims, arguing that letter writing enabled a disparate and politically marginal assortment of people to take shape as a coherent and powerful movement. “The Politics of Correspondence” expands the definition of politics, demonstrating that private correspondence, not just public action, can be a significant form of political participation. The antislavery movement’s body of shared political ideas and principles emerged out of contest and debate carried on largely through the exchange of letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Places in Peril
    o. 3, free 3, o. er de n I V Ins What’s What’s ol. 37, 37, ol. V Marker Marker Program 6 PAGE Air Sealing Old Home Your 8 PAGE Norm Nelson Norm Who We Are: Who We 5 PAGE ser B nter 2012–2013, 2012–2013, nter I W o Captions here... Save Our Place Our Save in Peril Places O T PHO CAVERLY TODD LANDMARKS Inc. landmarks, portland greater our future our homes, neighborhoods, Permit No. 396 No. Permit Portland, ME 04101 ME Portland, A I D I A P U. S. Postage S. U. Non Profit Org. Profit Non SAVE THE DATE: March 23 & 24, 2013 WHere THere’S A Will… Estate planning involves important decisions that reflect your passions and beliefs. When preparing your will, please consider including Greater Portland Landmarks as a Holiday Inn by the Bay beneficiary. (next door to Greater Portland Landmarks offices) For further 33 Spring Street ~ Portland, ME information, please contact Hilary Bassett at 207-774-5561 x101 We invite you to become a member of Greater Portland landmarks! Call (207) 774-5561 www.portlandlandmarks.org GPL filler ad Dear Members and Friends: PreservatIon uPdates ruce katz of the brookings institution was in Augusta October 23 for GrowSmart Maine’s Summit to review progress made toward the recommenda- tions of their groundbreaking study, Charting Maine’s Future published in 2006. The 2012 follow up report, Making Headway, evaluates each recommendation, cites specific examples, and notes lessons learned. “Remember what makes you special and Maine Jewish Museum Bcapitalize on that,” Katz said.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Character Enriches Our Lives
    SPRING 2021 ■ VOL. 46, NO. 1 LANDMARKS OBSERVER Historic character enriches our lives LOOKING BACK AT THE OBSERVATORY RESTORATION SEE PAGE 8 WHO WE ARE: Jessica MilNeil SEE PAGE 10 THE MAINE SCHOOL OF MASONRY SEE PAGE 4 LETTER FROM SARAH HANSEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PRING IS FINALLY HERE, and with it a reporting challenges in filling specialized positions. sense of renewed purpose! In this “Traditional trades are critically important to issue of the Observer, we focus on the preserving the heritage and continued use of preservation trades, and their critical our historic built environment for future gen- importance. Restoration and reha- erations,” ACHP Chairman Aimee Jorjani said. bilitation work on historic buildings “It is more important than ever, with the Great Srequires specialized training, including knowledge American Outdoors Act that is now law as well of materials and systems of construction. We are as the pandemic’s impact on employment, to thrilled to be able to highlight the amazing work increase the number of skilled craftspeople in of the Maine School of Masonry, and reflect on traditional trades. These are skills that can be the extraordinary restoration team that worked on added to those currently in the construction the Portland Observatory. While we are lucky here field or for those interested in pursuing creative in Maine to have extraordinarily talented preser- Executive Director Sarah Hansen working on and skilled hands-on preservation work.” vation practitioners, all of us are acutely aware site in the historic ghost town of Dearfield, Need some help finding skilled practitioners of the need to increase training opportunities in Colorado, a designated Homestead National for your project? Check out our Northern New the preservation trades, and we look forward to Historical Park.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NFS Form 10-900a OMB Approval No. 1024—0018 (Aug. 2002) (Expires Jan. 2005) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number Page SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 05001612 Date Listed: 2/3/06 Abyssinian Meeting House Cumberland ME Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. Iff/Signature of the Keeper Date of Action \ ^* AmendedA "• "• ItemsTJ in• Nomination:Tk.T • A • This SLR amends the nomination to add Criterion A. Under Criterion D, Phase I testing has indicated that below ground features are very well preserved, that the property exhibits intact stratigraphy, and that artifacts uncovered in context can provide significant information about the building episodes on the property, the locations of various outbuildings and potentially the spring, and, more importantly, about African American religious and social practices in 19th century Maine. Under Criterion A, the property exemplifies not only a rare frame public building from the early 19th century that survived the Portland fire of 1866, but visually exemplifies both the important information the property can convey (that of the buildings architecture and layout) as well as the social history of the African-American community in Portland. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) It/ United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts.
    [Show full text]