Recirculated Final Supplemental Environmental
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Final JOHNSON DRIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ZONE Partial Recirculated Supplemental Environmental Impact Report – Response to Comments Prepared for November 2019 City of Pleasanton Final JOHNSON DRIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ZONE Partial Recirculated Supplemental Environmental Impact Report – Response to Comments Prepared for November 2019 City of Pleasanton 550 Kearny Street Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94108 415.896.5900 esassoc.com Bend Oakland San Diego Camarillo Orlando San Francisco Delray Beach Pasadena Santa Monica Destin Petaluma Sarasota Irvine Portland Seattle Los Angeles Sacramento Tampa D140421.02 OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone Partial Recirculated Supplemental Environmental Impact Report – Response to Comments Document Volume 1 Page 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 California Environmental Quality Act Process ............................................................ 1-1 1.2 Method of Organization ............................................................................................... 1-2 2. Persons Commenting on the Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR ....................................... 2-1 2.1 List of Comment Letters Received .............................................................................. 2-1 3. Written Comments on the Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR and Responses to Comments ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Responses to Comments .............................................................................................. 3-1 Letter 1. Laborers’ International Union of North America (Michael R. Lozeau) ........ 3-1 Letter 2. Pleasanton Citizens for Responsible Growth (Mark R. Wolfe) .................. 3-44 Letter 3. Kellie Collier ............................................................................................... 3-63 Letter 4. Karen Cooper .............................................................................................. 3-66 Letter 5. Vicki Cunniffe ............................................................................................. 3-66 Letter 6. Sherrie Howell ............................................................................................. 3-69 Letter 7. Robert Jacobsen ........................................................................................... 3-70 Letter 8. Patricia Lanning .......................................................................................... 3-72 Letter 9. Don Maday .................................................................................................. 3-73 Letter 10. Ann Pfaff-Doss .......................................................................................... 3-74 Letter 11. Randall Reber ............................................................................................ 3-76 Letter 12. Craig Schwab ............................................................................................ 3-77 Letter 13. Matt Sullivan ............................................................................................. 3-86 Letter 14. Dorinda Wong ......................................................................................... 3-119 Other Letters ............................................................................................................ 3-120 4. Summary of Changes to the Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR ........................................ 4-1 5. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Revised November 2019) .................. 5-1 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Format .......................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Enforcement ................................................................................................................. 5-2 Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone i ESA / 140421 Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR Response to Comments November 2019 Table of Contents Page Figures No figures presented. Tables Table 3-1 Project Development Program Assumed in Air Quality Analysis, Current Project vs. 2015 DSEIR Project .......................................................................... 3-19 Table 3-2 REVISED Air Quality Table 7, Phase 1 (2021) Average Daily Unmitigated Operational Emissions by Source ........................................................................ 3-21 Table 3-3 REVISED Air Quality Table 10, Average Daily Unmitigated Construction Plus Operational Emissions ................................................................................. 3-22 Table 3-4 REVISED Air Quality Table 12, Full Buildout (2031) Average Daily Unmitigated Operational Emissions by Source ................................................... 3-24 Table 3-5 REVISED Air Quality Table 5, Average Daily Unmitigated Construction Emissions by Source ............................................................................................ 3-51 Table 3-6 REVISED Air Quality Table 6, Average Daily Mitigated Construction Emissions by Source ............................................................................................ 3-52 Table 3-7 REVISED HRA Table 6, Project Maximum Incremental Increase in Cancer Risk ......................................................................................................... 5-53 Table 3-8 REVISED HRA Table 7, Project Maximum Chronic Hazard Index .................. 5-53 Table 3-9 REVISED HRA Table 8, Project Maximum Annual PM2.5 Concentrations ....... 5-54 Table 3-10 Costco Gasoline Fuel Station Average Member Wait Times ............................. 3-79 Table 5-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ..................................................... 5-3 Volume 2 Appendices Appendix A Comment Letters Appendix B Revised Emissions Results Tables Appendix C Modeling Results Appendix D Memorandum: Wait Time for Costco Gasoline Fuel Stations (Kittelson & Associates) Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone ii ESA / 140421 Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR Response to Comments November 2019 Acronyms and Other Abbreviations Acronym/Abbreviation Definition µg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter 2017 Scoping Plan Update 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments AQ Air Quality ARB California Air Resources Board BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit BEV battery electric vehicle BMC Berkeley Municipal Code CalEEMod CALifornia Emissions Estimator MODel CALGreen Code California Green Building Standards Code Caltrans California Department of Transportation CAP Climate Action Plan CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board CARE Community Air Risk Evaluation Program CBD Center for Biological Diversity v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (62 Cal.4th 204) CBE v. SCAQMD Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. ([2010] 48 Cal.4th 310, 327) C.C.R., CCR California Code of Regulations CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act City City of Pleasanton CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent CO2e/SP/yr carbon dioxide equivalent per service population per year CY cubic yard(s) dBA A-weighted decibels Draft SEIR Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report EBEW East Bay Energy Watch EDZ Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone EMFAC2017 California Air Resources Board’s EMission FACtors Model, 2017 version ESA Environmental Science Associates g/L grams per liter GDF gasoline dispensing facility General Plan Pleasanton General Plan 2005–2025 GHG greenhouse gas HHDT heavy-heavy-duty truck HRA Health Risk Assessment I-580 Interstate 580 I-680 Interstate 680 I-710 Interstate 710 ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone iii ESA / 140421 Partial Recirculated Draft SEIR Response to Comments November 2019 Acronyms and Other Abbreviations Acronym/Abbreviation Definition JDEDZ Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone Kings County Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692 km kilometer(s) lbs/day pounds per day Lead Agency City of Pleasanton Leq energy-equivalent sound level m2 square meters MEIR maximally exposed individual receptor MEIW maximally exposed individual worker MHDT medium-heavy-duty truck MT metric ton(s) MT/yr metric tons per year MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission MTCO2e metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent