Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Lipteninae) Uses a Color-Generating Mechanism Widely Applied by Butterflies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Metamorphosis Issn 1018–6490 (Print) Issn 2307–5031 (Online) Lepidopterists’ Society of Africa
Volume 31: 4–6 METAMORPHOSIS ISSN 1018–6490 (PRINT) ISSN 2307–5031 (ONLINE) LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA NOTE Unique genitalic structure in a West African lycaenid butterfly, Liptena seyboui Warren-Gash & Larsen, 2003 (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Poritiinae, Liptenini) Published online: 26 February 2020 Szabolcs Sáfián1 & Jadwiga Lorenc-Brudecka2 1 African Natural History Research Trust, Street Court, Kingsland, Leominster, Herefordshire, HR6 9QA, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Nature Education Centre, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 5, 30-387 Kraków, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © Lepidopterists’ Society of Africa INTRODUCTION possible to produce during the time of description. The Liberian specimen is also illustrated (Fig. 2). Liptena Westwood, [1851] is a large, quite heterogeneic genus distributed solely in the Afrotropical region with the Specimen data: ♂ LIBERIA, Wologizi Mountains, Ridge majority of species being restricted to the main Guineo- Camp 2, 8°7'20.79"N, 9°56'50.75"W, 883 m, 22– 31.xi.2018. General collecting. Sáfián, Sz., Simonics, G. Congolian forest zone and only a few occurring in the Leg. ANHRT: 2018.43. ANHRT unique number: southern (Zambezian) and northern (Guinea savannah) ANHRTUK00058074. transition zone and dense woodland, savannah area (Larsen 1991, 2005). Stempffer’s (1967) terminology of genitalia characters are used to described the genitalic features of L. seyboui with Male genitalia of Liptena are discussed extensively by slight modifications, where no appropriate association Stempffer (1967) and Stempffer et al. (1974), who also was possible. Genitalia were dissected using KOH illustrated genitalia of at least one species of each defined solution to dissolve soft abdominal tissue. -
Butterflies-Of-Thailand-Checklist-2018
PAPILIONIDAE Parnassinae: Bhutanitis lidderdalii ocellatomaculata Great Bhutan ผเี สอื้ ภฐู าน Papilioninae: Troides helena cerberus Common Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองป่ าสงู Troides aeacus aeacus Golden Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองธรรมดา Troides aeacus malaiianus Troides amphrysus ruficollis Malayan Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองปักษ์ใต ้ Troides cuneifera paeninsulae Mountain Birdwing ผเี สอื้ ถงุ ทองภเู ขา Atrophaneura sycorax egertoni Whitehead Batwing ผเี สอื้ คา้ งคาวหวั ขาว Atrophaneura varuna zaleucus Burmese Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวพมา่ Atrophaneura varuna varuna Malayan Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวมาเลย์ Atrophaneura varuna astorion Common Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวธรรมดา Atrophaneura aidoneus Striped Batwing ผเี สอื้ ปีกคา้ งคาวขา้ งแถบ Byasa dasarada barata Great Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ ใหญ่ Byasa polyeuctes polyeuctes Common Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ ธรรมดา Byasa crassipes Small Black Windmill ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ เล็กด า Byasa adamsoni adamsoni Adamson's Rose ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ อดัมสนั Byasa adamsoni takakoae Losaria coon doubledayi Common Clubtail ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ หางกวิ่ Losaria neptunus neptunus Yellow-bodied Clubtail ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ กน้ เหลอื ง Losaria neptunus manasukkiti Pachliopta aristolochiae goniopeltis Common Rose ผเี สอื้ หางตมุ ้ จดุ ชมพู Pachliopta aristolochiae asteris Papilio demoleus malayanus Lime Butterfly ผเี สอื้ หนอนมะนาว Papilio demolion demolion Banded Swallowtail ผเี สอื้ หางตงิ่ สะพายขาว Papilio noblei Noble's Helen ผเี สอื้ หางตงิ่ โนเบลิ้ Papilio castor mahadeva Siamese Raven ผเี สอื้ เชงิ ลายมหาเทพสยาม -
Exploitation of Lycaenid-Ant Mutualisms by Braconid Parasitoids
31(3-4):153-168,Journal of Research 1992 on the Lepidoptera 31(3-4):153-168, 1992 153 Exploitation of lycaenid-ant mutualisms by braconid parasitoids Konrad Fiedler1, Peter Seufert1, Naomi E. Pierce2, John G. Pearson3 and Hans-Thomas Baumgarten1 1 Theodor-Boveri-Zentrum für Biowissenschaften, Lehrstuhl Zoologie II, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany 2 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138-2902, USA 3 Division of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Western State College, Gunnison, CO 81230, USA Abstract. Larvae of 17 Lycaenidae butterfly species from Europe, North America, South East Asia and Australia were observed to retain at least some of their adaptations related to myrmecophily even after parasitic braconid larvae have emerged from them. The myrme- cophilous glandular organs and vibratory muscles of such larval carcasses remain functional for up to 8 days. The cuticle of lycaenid larvae contains extractable “adoption substances” which elicit anten- nal drumming in their tending ants. These adoption substances, as well, appear to persist in a functional state beyond parasitoid emer- gence, and the larval carcasses are hence tended much like healthy caterpillars. In all examples, the braconids may receive selective advantages through myrmecophily of their host larvae, instead of being suppressed by the ant guard. Interactions where parasitoids exploit the ant-mutualism of their lycaenid hosts have as yet been recorded only from the Apanteles group in the Braconidae- Microgasterinae. KEY WORDS: Lycaenidae, Formicidae, myrmecophily, adoption sub- stances, parasitoids, Braconidae, Apanteles, defensive mechanisms INTRODUCTION Parasitoid wasps or flies are major enemies of the early stages of most Lepidoptera (Shaw 1990, Weseloh 1993). -
Phylogeny of the Aphnaeinae: Myrmecophilous African Butterflies
Systematic Entomology (2015), 40, 169–182 DOI: 10.1111/syen.12098 Phylogeny of the Aphnaeinae: myrmecophilous African butterflies with carnivorous and herbivorous life histories JOHN H. BOYLE1,2, ZOFIA A. KALISZEWSKA1,2, MARIANNE ESPELAND1,2,3, TAMARA R. SUDERMAN1,2, JAKE FLEMING2,4, ALAN HEATH5 andNAOMI E. PIERCE1,2 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 2Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 3Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 4Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A. and 5Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa Abstract. The Aphnaeinae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) are a largely African subfamily of 278 described species that exhibit extraordinary life-history variation. The larvae of these butterflies typically form mutualistic associations with ants, and feed on awide variety of plants, including 23 families in 19 orders. However, at least one species in each of 9 of the 17 genera is aphytophagous, parasitically feeding on the eggs, brood or regurgitations of ants. This diversity in diet and type of symbiotic association makes the phylogenetic relations of the Aphnaeinae of particular interest. A phylogenetic hypothesis for the Aphnaeinae was inferred from 4.4 kb covering the mitochondrial marker COI and five nuclear markers (wg, H3, CAD, GAPDH and EF1) for each of 79 ingroup taxa representing 15 of the 17 currently recognized genera, as well as three outgroup taxa. Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference analyses all support Heath’s systematic revision of the clade based on morphological characters. -
Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest. -
BIONOTES Vol
ISSN 0972-1800 Volume 21, No.1 QU AR TERL Y January-March,2019 Date of publication: 28 March, 2019 BIONOTES Vol. 21 (1) Mar., 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial 1 SIGHTINGS OF JAMIDES BOCHUS (STOLL, [1782]) AND PROSOTAS NORA (C. FELDER, 1860) (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) FROM URBANIZED PARTS OF NEW DELHI, INDIA by Rajesh Choudhary and Vinesh Kumar 3 GAEANA CONSORS (ATKINSON, 1884) (HEMIPTERA:CICADIDAE) IN CENTRAL NEPAL by Shristee Panthee, Bandana Subedi, Basant Sharma and Anoj Subedi 6 FIRST RECORD OF BLUE-CHEEKED BEE-EATER (MEROPS PERSICUS PALLAS, 1773) (AVES: MEROPIDAE) FROM THE SOUTHERN TIP OF INDIA by C. Susanthkumar, K. Hari Kumar and P. Prasath 8 REDISCOVERY OF THE NARROW SPARK BUTTERFLY SINTHUSA NASAKA PALLIDIOR FRUHSTORFER, 1912 (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE: THECLINAE) FROM UTTARAKHAND, INDIA by Shankar Kumar, Raj Shekhar Singh and Paramjit Singh 10 EXTENSION OF THE KNOWN DISTRIBUTION OF THE VAGRANT BUTTERFLY VAGRANS EGISTA (CRAMER, [1780])(LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE) TO BASTAR, CHHATTISGARH by Anupam Sisodia and Ravi Naidu 12 ORSOTRIAENA MEDUS MEDUS (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE) FROM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA by Peter Smetacek, Anant Kumar, Nandani Salaria, Anupam Sisodia and C. Susanthkumar 14 GAEANA CONSORS (ATKINSON, 1884) (HEMIPTERA: CICADIDAE) IN THE KUMAON HIMALAYA, UTTARAKHAND, INDIA by Peter Smetacek 16 A NEW LARVAL HOST PLANT, FICUS RACEMOSA, OF THE COPPER FLASH BUTTERFLY RAPALA PHERETIMA (HEWITSON, 1863) FROM ASSAM, INDIA by Parixit Kafley 17 OBITUARY: Martin Woodcock by Bikram Grewal 19 BIONOTES Vol. 21 (1) Mar., 2019 SIGHTINGS OF JAMIDES BOCHUS (STOLL, [1782]) AND PROSOTAS NORA (C. FELDER, 1860) (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) FROM URBANIZED PARTS OF NEW DELHI, INDIA RAJESH CHAUDHARY* & VINESH KUMAR Department of Biomedical Science, Acharya Narendra Dev College (University of Delhi), Govindpuri, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110 019. -
Entomologische Zeitung Stettin
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomologische Zeitung Stettin Jahr/Year: 1908 Band/Volume: 69 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fruhstorfer Hans Artikel/Article: Neue Curetis und Übersicht der bekannten Arten 49-59 ©Biodiversity Heritage Library, www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at 49 Neue Curetis und Uebersicht der bekannten Arten von II. Frulistorfer. Wenngleich mir aus Süd-Asien 135 und allein aus Java 80 Exempl. vorliegen ist es mir nicht möglich mehr als 5 Arten Curetis zu unterscheiden, während de Niceville in Butterflies India nicht weniger als ,,13 Arten" nur aus Nord-Indien und Birma, und Distant, Rhopalocera Malayana deren 5 von der Malay. Halbinsel registriert. In der Hauptsache haben wir es mit 2 Gruppen von Individuen zu tun, die sich recht gut insgesamt auf 4 Species alter Autoren zurückführen lassen. Die vielen Moore'schen und Felder'schen ,, Species" bezeichnen dagegen fast aus- schließlich Lokalrassen, Zeitformen und vielfach sogar nur individuelle Formen. Bei den Ctiretis macht sich nämlich ein bei den Lycae- niden kaum beobachteter, weitgehender männlicher Poly- morphismus bemerklich, wie wir ihn in noch höherem Grade, unter den Nymphaliden etwa bei einigen Euthaliiden und Euphaedra-Arten wiederfinden und dieser Polymorphismus verleitete die Autoren zur Creierung der vielen Arten! Meine heutigen Zeilen sollen dazu beitragen die Sy- nonymie der Curetis etwas zu klären und die Kenntnis einiger neuer Formen meiner letzten Reisen vermitteln. I. Gruppe. Hinterflügel rundlich. A. $ mit weißen Discalflecken. I. Curetis thetis Drury. a) thetis thetis Drury. Bombay (Drury). = P. phaedrus F. ,,Habitat in India orientali" (^. = P. aesopus F. -
315 Genus Mimacraea Butler
AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES 17th edition (2018). MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Genus Mimacraea Butler, [1872] In Butler, [1869-74]. Lepidoptera Exotica, or descriptions and illustrations of exotic lepidoptera 104 (190 pp.). London. Type-species: Mimacraea darwinia Butler, by original designation. The genus Mimacraea belongs to the Family Lycaenidae Leach, 1815; Subfamily Poritiini Doherty, 1886; Tribe Liptenini Röber, 1892. The other genera in the Tribe Liptenini in the Afrotropical Region are Liptena, Obania, Kakumia, Tetrarhanis, Falcuna, Larinopoda, Micropentila, Pseuderesia, Eresina, Eresiomera, Parasiomera, Citrinophila, Argyrocheila, Teriomima, Euthecta, Cnodontes, Baliochila, Eresinopsides, Toxochitona, Toxochitona and Mimeresia. Mimacraea (Acraea Mimic) is a purely Afrotropical genus containing 20 species. Generic revision by Libert, 2000c (Revision du genre Mimacraea Butler avec description de quatre nouvelles especes et deux nouvelles sous-especes: 58 (1-73).) Classification of Mimacraea (Libert, 2000c) M. darwinia group M. darwinia sub-group M. darwinia Butler, [1872] M. apicalis apicalis Grose-Smith & Kirby, [1890] M. apicalis gabonica Libert, 2000 M. neavei Eltringham, 1909 M. maesseni Libert, 2000 M. febe Libert, 2000 M. landbecki sub-group M. landbecki Druce, 1910 M. telloides Schultze, 1923 M. abriana Libert & Collins, 2000 M. charmian group M. charmian sub-group M. charmian Grose-Smith & Kirby, [1890] M. fulvaria fulvaria Aurivillius, 1895 M. fulvaria eltringhami Druce, 1912 M. paragora paragora Rebel, 1911 M. paragora angulata Libert, 2000 M. neurata sub-group M. neurata Hoalland, 1895 M. krausei group M. krausei krausei Dewitz, 1889 M. krausei karschioides Carpenter & Jackson, 1950 M. krausei camerunica Libert, 2000 M. skoptoles group M. skoptoles Druce, 1907 M. gelinia group M. -
Butterfly Biodiversity in Singapore with Particular Reference to the Central
Proceedings of the Nature Reserves Survey Seminar. 70re 49(2) (1997) Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 49 (1997) 273-296. ~ laysia and Butterfly Biodiversity in Singapore with Particular :ingapore. Reference to the Central Catchment Nature Reserve discovery, 1 2 ~y Bulletin. S.K. KHEW AND STEVEN S.H. NE0 1103, Tai Keng Gardens, Singapore 535384 re. In: L.M. 2Blk 16, Simei Street 1, #05-13, Melville Park, Singapore 529942 )f Zoology, Abstract Chin, R.T. A total of 381 butterfly species have now been recorded in Singapore of which 18 are new City: Bukit records since 1990. Of this total, 236 species (62%) were recorded during the present JOre. Suppl. survey. A U except 8 (3%) of these occur within the Nature Reserves and 148 (63%) were recorded only within the Nature Reserves. A total of 74 species (31%) within the Reserves were considered very rare. e Nee Soon ion: Marine Introduction l impact of The study of butterflies by amateurs is not new, and indeed, it is through onservation. the observations of these dedicated individuals that much important data have been accumulated over the years. The information on butterfly biodiversity in Singapore is, at most, sketchy. Most of the documentation ater prawn, of the species occurred done during the post-war years until the late 1960s. nidae) from From our literature research, two references stand out: W.A. Fleming's )gy. 43: 299- Butterflies of West Malaysia and Singapore (1991) and Steven Corbet and Maurice Pendlebury's Butterfli es of the Malay Peninsula (1992). Although the latest editions of the two reference books were published in the early ~amalph eops 1990s, most of the updates referred only to the Peninsular Malaysia. -
Some Endemic Butterflies of Eastern Africa and Malawi
SOME ENDEMIC BUTTERFLIES OF EASTERN AFRICA AND MALAWI T C E Congdon, Ivan Bampton* *ABRI, P O Box 14308, Nairobi Kenya Abstract: The ‘Eastern Arc’ of Kenya and Tanzania is defined in terms of its butterfly fauna. Butterflies endemic to it and neighbouring ecological zones are listed. The ‘Tanzania-Malawi Highlands’ are identified as an ecological zone. Distributions of the endemic butterflies within the Eastern Arc and other zones are examined. Some possible causes of endemism are suggested. Conservation issues are discussed. An updated list of the endemic Butterflies of Tanzania is given. Key words and phrases: Endemism, biodiversity, conservation, ecological zones, East African Coastal Belt, Eastern Arc Mountains, Tanzania-Malawi Highlands. Introduction The Study Area includes the whole of Tanzania, with extensions to include coastal Kenya and the highlands of Malawi. Ecological zones within the study area are identified. Butterflies endemic within the study area are listed by zone, and distributions within two of the zones are examined in detail. The conservation status of important forests is discussed and the most vulnerable areas are identified. In the Appendix (I) we provide an updated checklist of Tanzania’s endemic species. Methods and Materials Ecological zones are defined. The species endemic to each zone are listed, together with their distribution within the zone and altitude range within which they are known to occur (Table 1): totals are given. In the discussion section zonal endemism is examined. Species endemic to individual mountain blocks are scheduled in Table 2 and totals are given. Conservation priorities are discussed. The number of species each block shares with each other block is tabulated (Table 3) together with the total of species so shared present on each block. -
International Journal of Research Volume VIII, Issue VI, JUNE/2019
International Journal of Research ISSN NO:2236-6124 A Study on the Congregation of Adult Butterflies on Non-floral Resources at Different Locations in Jalpaiguri district of West Bengal, India Panchali Sengupta1*, Narayan Ghorai2 1Department of Zoology, West Bengal State University, Berunanpukaria, Malikapur, Barasat, District-24 Parganas (North), Kolkata-700126.West Bengal, India Email id: [email protected] 2Department of Zoology, West Bengal State University, Berunanpukaria, Malikapur, Barasat, District-24 Parganas (North), Kolkata-700126.West Bengal, India email id: [email protected] Abstract Several instances of puddling, as reported among different herbivore arthropods, appears quite interesting. Significantly, congregation of adult butterflies at several non-floral resources (wet soil/mud, animal dung, bird droppings, carrion, rotten/fermenting fruits) were examined at different locations in Jalpaiguri district adjacent to the tea estates, villages and agricultural tracts. Different species of papilionids and pierids congregate on wet soil patch and puddle collectively. However other species of nymphalid, lycaenid and hesperid are found to puddle individually, without associating with others on resources like excrements and carrion. Irrespective of any species newly emerged males, and aged females are found to puddle. Interestingly, each species belonging to a particular family have a specific range of puddling duration. Such specificity in puddling among species of a family could probably be associated with their need for a common nutrient. Keywords:, congregation, hesperid, lycaenid, nymphalid, papilionid, pierid *corresponding author Volume VIII, Issue VI, JUNE/2019 Page No:5877 International Journal of Research ISSN NO:2236-6124 Introduction Puddling is a widely recognised fascinating event in the life history of any herbivore arthropods except beetles targeted towards accumulation of specific micronutrient (Mollemann, 2010). -
Amphiesmeno- Ptera: the Caddisflies and Lepidoptera
CY501-C13[548-606].qxd 2/16/05 12:17 AM Page 548 quark11 27B:CY501:Chapters:Chapter-13: 13Amphiesmeno-Amphiesmenoptera: The ptera:Caddisflies The and Lepidoptera With very few exceptions the life histories of the orders Tri- from Old English traveling cadice men, who pinned bits of choptera (caddisflies)Caddisflies and Lepidoptera (moths and butter- cloth to their and coats to advertise their fabrics. A few species flies) are extremely different; the former have aquatic larvae, actually have terrestrial larvae, but even these are relegated to and the latter nearly always have terrestrial, plant-feeding wet leaf litter, so many defining features of the order concern caterpillars. Nonetheless, the close relationship of these two larval adaptations for an almost wholly aquatic lifestyle (Wig- orders hasLepidoptera essentially never been disputed and is supported gins, 1977, 1996). For example, larvae are apneustic (without by strong morphological (Kristensen, 1975, 1991), molecular spiracles) and respire through a thin, permeable cuticle, (Wheeler et al., 2001; Whiting, 2002), and paleontological evi- some of which have filamentous abdominal gills that are sim- dence. Synapomorphies linking these two orders include het- ple or intricately branched (Figure 13.3). Antennae and the erogametic females; a pair of glands on sternite V (found in tentorium of larvae are reduced, though functional signifi- Trichoptera and in basal moths); dense, long setae on the cance of these features is unknown. Larvae do not have pro- wing membrane (which are modified into scales in Lepi- legs on most abdominal segments, save for a pair of anal pro- doptera); forewing with the anal veins looping up to form a legs that have sclerotized hooks for anchoring the larva in its double “Y” configuration; larva with a fused hypopharynx case.