DOCSLIB.ORG

The Conquests HSTAFM 162, Class 2.2 January 14, 2016 H a of Islam Spreads 01–07 21/5/04 9:06 AM Page 27

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Conquests HSTAFM 162, Class 2.2 January 14, 2016 H a of Islam Spreads 01–07 21/5/04 9:06 AM Page 27 The Conquests HSTAFM 162, Class 2.2 January 14, 2016 H A of Islam Spreads 01–07 21/5/04 9:06 AM Page 27 MUHAMMAD’S MISSION AND CAMPAIGNS Muhammad’s Missions and Campaigns to 632 Muhammad moves to Medina 30° 35° 40° 45° 50° 55° 60° Campaigns Conquered by Muhammad to 632 Anatolia Conquered by Abu Bakr 632–34 Battle site with date Marash Samosata Edessa Dabiq Harran Tigris Mosul Qazvin Antioch Aleppo Rayy 35° Cyprus Raqqa Hamadan Tripoli Homs Euphrates Jafula Mediterranean E Nihavand SASANIAN Sea R Damascus I Ctesiphon EMPIRE Caesarea P Wasit Damietta Gaza Kufa Isfahan M Alexandria Jerusalem Qadisiya 636 E Heliopolis 30° al-Fustat E Basra Kerman (Cairo) N I Dumat al-Jandal T Shiraz N B Y Z A P e r s Siraf HEJAZ i N a i le n G u l f 25° G u 625 l f Aswan o Medina al-Yamama f O Red Sea m a n 624 Arabia 632 Muscat NOBATIA 630 Mecca i r l e 20° a t h r K a MAKKURA l u a q b y u t R p e m e t h 633 ALWA Arabian Sea 15° Sana N AXUM 633 0 400 km 0 400 miles 27 The Death of Muḥammad (632 CE) • Crisis of succession • Rebellion of Arab tribes • Sustainability of the Arab state The Conquerors Arrive • 636: Battles of Yarmuk (Syria) and Qādisiyya (Iraq) • 639–42: Conquest of Egypt • 642: Battle of Nahāvand. • 650: Merv in Central Asia captured. Last Sasanian king Yazdgird III (r. 632–651) killed. • 711: Sind and Andalusia invaded • 751: Muslims meet the armies of the Tang Chinese at Talas in Central Asia. H A of Islam Spreads 01–07 21/5/04 9:06 AM Page 28 H A of Islam Spreads 01–07 21/5/04 9:06 AM Page 29 HISTORICAL ATLAS OF THE ISLAMIC WORLD EXPANSION OF ISLAM TO 750 10 ° Expansion of Islam to 750 0 10 ° 20 ° ° ° ° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80 90 F R K A N I N N A N S A G K Expansion to 750 E S D I Muhammad’s death left the Muslim communi- T D S L H C U O H A V S R A M Arab advance ty without an obvious leader. One of his oldest O I Q A U S Battle site C IT B U L G A R S I A companions, Abu Bakr (r. 632–634), was IN T E Expansion of Islam: acknowledged by several leaders as the first N A A L V Under Muhammad caliph, or successor. Under Abu Bakr and his E A 50° T M R P A I I A N S successor Umar (634–644), the tribes, who had RE H U N G A R Under Abu Bakr (632–634) K K . K O begun to fall away on the death of Muhammad, O H A Under Umar (634–644) F Agadir F Z A T were reunited under the banner of Islam and T S R Under Uthman (644–656) H L E and Ali (656–661) E M converted into a formidable military and ideo- A P S L V I R E Under the Umayyads (661–750) Rome O E L B Rome S P logical force. The Arabs broke out of the penin- E M O R B BU E A L P sula, conquering half the Byzantine provinces B GA E R RIA D C R I as well as defeating the armies of Sasanian S S K Sy Aral r D R ar Persia. Ctesiphon, the Persian capital, fell in Carthage Black Sea Sea ya rthage C U 751 A Kairouan Constantinople a T Talas A N I B T R H rouan 698 673– s R G 637, Jerusalem in 638. By 646, under Umar’s F Y 77, 717 p A F E ° S – i N 40 R 670 18 670 Z a S A n successor Uthman (r. 644–656), the whole of I A O Q N RMEN A X T IA mu Tiflis Derbend D I The Dome of the Rock in I I ar A Egypt had come under Arab Muslim control. a N ya N Y E S 710 E Erzurum e A Jerusalem, built by the Caliph A M a Samarkand Acquiring ships from Egypt and Syria, the nomadic preda- Tripoli P I A 710 M R E Z Bukhara E h 647 R Abd al-Malik in 691–92, is the e B Arabs conducted seaborne raids, conquering tors would have d A i I t Tarsus JA first great building to have been e Edessa M Tabriz N Ardabil Mery 664 Cyprus in 649 and pillaging Rhodes in 654. taken the plunder or r Rhodes E Balkh r S a a 654 Antioch O N constructed after the Arab n Cyprus P A Religious differences between the Byzantine held onto land, dispersing e O Mosul G 664 a 649 E 641 R 651 n u T GU Nishapur Kabul S p A conquest. Embellished with rulers and their subjects in Egypt and Syria e h Rayy as landlords or peasants L a ra M AB r I SYR t Jalula K NJ BY Damascus IA es I H U Herat U A A R A S P Koranic quotations proclaiming ensured that the Muslims were met with indif- capital from 658 635 A N among the conquered peoples. Nehavend Ramla Kerbela the unity of God, the building Yarmuk 680 642 N ference, or even welcomed by fellow monothe- In a farsighted decision Caliph a Alexandria 636 Ctesiphon A N I A 711 Fihl S A S Multan 30° Jerusalem surrounds the rock from where 646 Kufa Susa ists embittered by decades of alien Byzantine Umar encouraged the tribes to settle al-Fustat 638 S I A Ajnadain Qadisiya 636 Isfahan P E R Faiyum670 Heliopolis 634 U Muhammad is believed to have rule. But secular factors were also important. with a system of stipends paid from the 640 I N D s H F u Basra A S E I S T A N d S embarked on his miraculous n E The Arabs were motivated by desire for plun- common treasury, which took control of E 656 R Istahar 648 I A T G S S T Y K P Tabuk I “night journey” to heaven. der, as well as religious faith. In previous eras T R ND the conquered lands. The Arabs were kept B M SI A P H e A R r N apart from the population in armed camps that N A s i l I i e N a A N n M A K R evolved into garrison cities such as Basra and H G u Tropic of Cancer E l f Kufa in Iraq. Although the tensions over the Badr J 624 A Suhar Z Medina Y O Arabian Sea distribution of booty would erupt into open A M Muscat M A A N civil war the overall control exercised by the M M 20° A A R fledgling Islamic government remained under K Mecca e A r a b i a n K d 622 dynastic rule. Though individual dynasties U Dongola S P l a R e e n i n s u would often be challenged as ruling contrary to I a A Islamic principles of equality and justice, the T U N Najran A dynastic system of governance fitted the pre- Soba M A R H vailing form of social organization, the patriar- D ALODIA A INDIAN OCEAN chal kinship group, and remained the norm H Y E M E N until modern times. Under the Umayyads the KINGDOM ° remarkable expansion of Islam continued, with OF AXUM Aden 0 300 km 10 the Arab raiders reaching as far as central 0 300 miles France and the Indus Valley. 28 29 What Drove the Conquests? • Ecological Thesis: The Byzantine-Sasanian Wars (602–628), along with the outbreak of disease (plague of 619) and climate change severely depleted the region’s resources. • Nationalist Thesis: Concentrated effort of united tribes could be directed to conquest outside the borders of Arabia. • Accidental Thesis • Money: – Spoils of War: ‘Umar establishes the dīwān, a list that divides the spoils of conquest up among the armies according to seniority in conversion – Question of Centralization: centralized on a strategic but not tactical level Islam and Taxes • Muslim Isolation: – Miṣr (amṣār): garrison cities – Laws for non-Muslims (dhimmī): religious freedom, separate dress, no weapons • Non-Muslims & Taxes: – The jizya (poll tax) as ‘compensation’ for religious freedom taken from non-Muslim adult males; exempted from zakāt (alms tax) • Result: Conversion is Slow – In Iraq in 800 CE, only 18% Muslim – Majority of Egypt is not Muslim until the 11th century Leadership and Authority • Succession to Muhammad: religious and/or political authority? • Caliph: ‘khalīfat allāh’ or ‘khalīfat rasūl allāh’ – Deputy of God or Deputy of the Messenger of God? • The Partisans of ‘Ali • First Civil War 656-660 – ‘Āʼisha (defeated at Battle of the Camel by ʻAlī in 656) – Muʻāwiya, a relative of the third caliph ʻUthmān and governor of Syria since 639 – Ali and his partisans (face-off with Muʻāwiya at Battle of Ṣiffin in 657) – The Khārijites: the first radicals, secede from ʻAlī’s party after arbitration with Muʻāwiya (defeated by ʻAlī in 658, assassinate him in 661) The Battle of Ṣiffīn, from a 13th century illustrated Book of History of Balʻamī Qurʼān as a Book • Types of material: – Hortatory/didactic: believe, do good deeds, fear God, beware the Day of Judgment, obey God and his Prophet – Narrative: tales of Moses, Abraham, Noah, Yusuf, Zulaykha – Predictive/Eschatological: fate of believers and unbelievers, creation and end of the world – Polemical: claims of Muhammad’s opponents, the failings of the ‘People of the Book’ – Doctrinal: the nature of God – Legal: less than 500 verses deal with law and ritual • Structure of Quran: • Not a continuous narrative • Contextual: asbāb al-nuzūl = occasions of revelation’ • Ellipticalism: assumes audience knowledge • Person: God as beyond language… ‘He’, ‘I’ ‘We’ and ‘God’ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region”
    Islamic Republic of Iran Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization ICHHTO “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” for inscription on the World Heritage List (Additional Information) UNESCO World Heritage Convention 2017 1 In the name of God 2 Evaluation of the nomination of the “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” (Islamic Republic of Iran) for inscription on the World Heritage List This report is submitted in response to the ICOMOS letter of GB/AS/1568-AddInf-1, dated 28September 2017 on the additional information for the nomination of Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region. The Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization is grateful to ICOMOS for its devotion to conservation and preservation of historic monuments and sites. The objective of this detailed report is to clarify the issues raised by ICOMOS in the aforementioned letter. Additional information for clarification on: - Serial approach - Risks and Factors affecting the property - Protection - Management - Monitoring 1- Serial approach Could the State Party kindly provide information on the rationale, methodology and criteria (here not referring to the nomination criteria), which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination? Could the State Party kindly outline the contribution of each site component, to the overall Outstanding Universal Value in the substantial, scientific and discernible way, as outlined in paragraph 137b of the Operational Guidelines? For clarifying, the question will be explained in the parts of (1-a) and (1-b) in details: 1-a: Rationale, methodology and criteria which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination: The rationale which guided the selection of the component sites is based on a methodology which takes into account their historical characteristics and at the same time considers their association with the regional landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dimedio.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE CHURCH OF THE EAST: RECLAIMING FORGOTTEN CHRISTIAN HISTORY MARIA DIMEDIO SPRING 2016 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in History with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: A. Gregg Roeber Professor of Early Modern History and Religious Studies Thesis Supervisor Michael Milligan Director of Undergraduate Studies Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT This thesis explores the unique history of the Christian Church of the East in Syria and Persia in late antiquity. The Church of the East played an important role in the stability of Christianity in the Middle East during the rise of Islam, specifically regarding the Islamic conquests of Sassanid Persia in the seventh century CE. In order to reach this point, this thesis explores the monotheistic traditions in ancient Syria and Persia, beginning with Judaism and pagan cultic practices, followed by the rise of Jesus of Nazareth. It then covers the emergence of unique theological differences between Christians practicing in the East, and the Roman Chalcedonian Church. In doing so, the misconceptions of the Church of the East, frequently referred to inaccurately as the ‘Nestorians,’ are debunked. Following this, political conflicts between the Roman Byzantine Empire and the Persian Sassanid Empire are argued to have forced theological decisions to be made by Eastern Christians in order to avoid persecution. By the Islamic conquests in the seventh century, the Church of the East was stable enough to survive a total political takeover.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginnings of Christianity in Merv
    Iranica Antiqua, vol. XXX, 1995 THE BEGINNINGS OF CHRISTIANITY IN MERV BY G. KOSHELENKO, A. BADER, V. GAIBOV (Moscow Institute of Archaeology) The history of Christianity in Merv is well-known enough beginning with the Sassanian era, thanks to the famous Chronicle of Seert and al- Biruni’s descriptions1. Other sources are unfortunately very often neglected, so one could have the impression that the earliest penetration of Christianity into Merv is only from the IVth century A.D. However, some materials show clearly that a certain presence of Christian religion can be traced in the town of Merv as well as in the area of the Merv oasis (Margiana) already in the Parthian epoch. While describing the famous scene of assignment of peoples and coun- tries for missionary activity among the apostles (by throwing lots), Pseudo-Hyppolytus mentions Parthians, Medians, Persians, Hyrcanians, Bactrians and Margians as the peoples which the apostle Thomas had to baptize. From the same text we learn that (according to Pseudo- Hyppolytus) St Thomas preached in an Indian town Kalamene also, and that he was buried there2. A confirmation of the Pseudo-Hyppolytus’ information seems to be preserved in the Armenian Christian tradition. In an Armenian synaxare under the 12th day of navasardom month (i.e. August, 22) St Thomas is mentioned as the prophet who contributed much to the christianization of India. Unfortunately, other details are lacking of this part of the Armenian 1 E. SACHAU, Die Christianisierung-Legende von Merv, Festschrift für Wolf Wilhelm Grafen von Baudissin, Giessen 1918; G. MESSINA, Al-Biruni sugli inizi del Cristianismo a Merv, Al-Biruni Commemoration Volume, A.H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Figurative Wall Painting of the Sasanian Period from Iran, Iraq and Syria1
    Iranica Antiqua, vol. XXXIX, 2004 THE FIGURATIVE WALL PAINTING OF THE SASANIAN PERIOD FROM IRAN, IRAQ AND SYRIA1 BY An DE WAELE (Ghent University) “… nec enim apud eos pingitur vel fingitur aliud, praetor varias caedes et bella.” Ammianus Marcellinus XXIV 6,32 1. Introduction The aim of this article is to provide a full view on our current knowledge of the figurative wall paintings of the Sasanian period from Iran, Iraq and Syria. All possible information has been collected, examined and finally resumed to this study. The themes that will be looked at are: the exact location of the paintings and function of this place; iconography (subject- composition-style); plastering, colour use and painting techniques; dating; and lastly the function of the murals (decorative-ideological/symbolical). As conclusion, they will be compared both with each other and with Sasanian art in general. Likewise, attention will be given to the profession of the painters. I just want to emphasize that only published data, drawings and pho- tographs were used (I have not been able to study the paintings themselves) so no new information will be given. Moreover, it concerns a summary but bibliographic references to more extensive descriptions and analyses will be provided. 1 This article is a summary of a part of my MA-thesis which I finished -under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Ernie Haerinck- in May 2002 at Ghent University and in which I studied the art of wall painting from both the Parthian and Sasanian empires. I owe much gratitude to Professor Haerinck, not only for offering me the opportunity and support to write this paper, but also for adjusting where necessary and for helping achieving my first article.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Archaeology of the Sasanian Period: Former Limitations and New Perspectives
    Newsletter di Archeologia CISA, Volume 7, 2016, pp. 35-88 A MODERN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE SASANIAN PERIOD: FORMER LIMITATIONS AND NEW PERSPECTIVES Bruno Genito, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” Introduction* It is never easy to handle theoretical and methodological issues arising from a particular scientific topic in a kind of review of studies, which is, in its way, what is being presented here. Studies of the archaeology of the Sasanian period have been the subject of numerous acute and critical comments by distinguished scholars in the past, including Huff (1986, 302-308) and more recently as well (1998-2011). Those issues which have been handled, too, have clearly always somewhat suffered from a complex of inferiority to other periods of the history of ancient Iran which are considered by far, the most formative and important: the Achaemenid and the Islamic eras. And this in spite of the fact that the majority of scholars have looked upon the period in question as a real golden age of Persian culture and art, and that it was quite often mentioned in later Islamic sources (including the Shah-nameh by Firdousi), as in many ways an apogee of the fabulous, formidable and legendary Persian Empires. For many scholars the archaeology of the Sasanian period and also that of the early Islamic period, as Whitcomb rightly has pointed out (2010, 5), has always been considered a part of history, and especially of the history of art. This classification, set in stone, has had a long and respectable tradition so far, but at last it has begun to be seen from a different perspective by a growing number of scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reasons for Drawing Attention to Western Iran (Kermanshah Province) During the Second Half of Sassanian Era
    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences May 2013, Vol. 3, No. 5 ISSN: 2222-6990 The Reasons for Drawing Attention to Western Iran (Kermanshah Province) During the Second Half of Sassanian Era Glareh Amiri Kermanshah , Hafez settlements Email: [email protected] Abstract Historically, Iran plateau has nurtured different cultures and due to its natural and geographical characteristics, has linked east cultures to Mesopotamia, so that the civilizations related to this plateau have served considerably humanity for a period of 1000 years. Among these cultures, the ones related to the western part of Iran plateau would play significant roles. Zagros foothills which have stretched from northern to the southern west are replete with green and affluent valleys with a distinguished position for the establishment of various cultures since ancient times. Kermanshah as a region located in such western parts draw the attention of Sassanid kings at the last years of fourth century (AD) (the second half of Sasanian kingdom), and Fars province became secondary to Sassanid s. Kermanshah in this period was a part of Mai or Mad located in Koust Khourbaran area, and later this region was called Kermanshah covering lands from Nahavand to Ctesiphon.There are several reasons to Sassanid kings attention in the second half of the Sassanid era to the western parts of Iran including military factors, religious beliefs, good weather, the existence of Khorasan wide road (Silk Road), tendency to gaining independence from religious centers and also commercial and economic factors. This paper, using historical documents and data and applying historical research techniques, attempts to investigate the geographical and political situation of the central Zagros region and the reasons for Sassanid kings attention to this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Ardasir's Struggle Against the Parthians. Towards A
    Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLVI, 2011 doi: 10.2143/IA.46.0.2084420 ARDASIR’S STRUGGLE AGAINST THE PARTHIANS. TOWARDS A REINTERPRETATION OF THE FIRUZABAD I RELIEF BY Maciej GRABOWSKI (Institute of Archeology, Warsaw University) Abstract: The proposed reinterpretation of the Firuzabad I relief is based on the assumption that we deal with a particular iconographic synopsis of the events that occurred during Ardasir’s war against the Arsacids (c. 220-228). The concept of iconographic summary of several historical events may be traced back to the Achaemenid period (Bisotun relief), and may also be observed in the triumph reliefs of Sapur I. It is thus suggested that each of the three equestrian combat scenes depicted on the Firuzabad I relief recalls one of three major stages of Ardasir’s struggle against the Parthians. Information from textual sources combined with iconographic observations permit to develop a hypothesis concerning the identity of some of the depicted personages, and thus to reveal proper historical context of each scene. New terminus post quem for the Firuzabad I relief is also proposed, this being the year 228 which most probably marks the end of the last phase of the war. Keywords: Sasanian rock reliefs, Firuzabad, Ardashir, Artabanus, Shapur. The earliest Sasanian rock sculptures are two reliefs commissioned by Ardasir I (224-240) and carved on the cliffs of the Tang-e Ab gorge, near the town of Firuzabad (Fars Province). The first one (Firuzabad I) depicts an equestrian combat between three pairs of Persian and Parthian knights (Pl. 1, fig. 1), whereas the second (Firuzabad II) shows the so-called “inves- titure” scene.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctesiphon and the Palace of Khosroes Author(S): E
    Ctesiphon and the Palace of Khosroes Author(s): E. Heawood Source: The Geographical Journal, Vol. 53, No. 2 (Feb., 1919), pp. 105-108 Published by: geographicalj Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1779540 Accessed: 11-06-2016 05:38 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers), Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Geographical Journal This content downloaded from 128.252.67.66 on Sat, 11 Jun 2016 05:38:55 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms CTESIPHON AND THE PALACE OF KHOSROES 105 then to hand, we felt convinced that we would be unlikely to find any inscriptions of real interest or of scientific value. This much is certain, that Al#Bilad was built when the Dhofar sea-coasts supported a larger and more flourishing population of Marwari tribes than may be found in these modern times. We asked them what use they made of the coconut. They roof their huts with the palm-leaves, use the shells for spoons and basins, and weave a little rope for their own use; but they were not alive to the possibilities of trade in copra and coir.
    [Show full text]
  • Silk Road” and Central Asia Time: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 9:30 – 10.45 Am Place: Silver Center for Arts & Science (100 Washington Sq East), Room 520
    FALL 18, CORE-UA 500, SESSION 1/SECTION 1: CULTURES & CONTEXTS Title: The “Silk Road” and Central Asia Time: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 9:30 – 10.45 am Place: Silver Center for Arts & Science (100 Washington Sq East), Room 520. Office Hrs: Thursdays, 11:00 am - 12:00 pm, 60 5th Avenue, 8th Floor, Rm. 861A. 1. Course Aims For millennia Central Asia has been a conduit for cultural encounters and transfers between China, India, the Near East and the Mediterranean. In an emblematic way this function is embodied in our image of the far-distance trade caravan, traversing the vast expanses of Central Asia on the “Silk roads” between the Chinese plains and the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. However, it were not only traders that connected the civilizations of the ancient world via Central Asia: with and next to the traders’ caravans traveled diplomats, missionaries, artists, mercenaries, and many more; and vast parts of Eurasia were, again and again, controlled and subsequently connected by confederations and empires ruled by Central Asian nomads. Focusing on the cultural history of Central Asia from the Bronze Age to the days of the Mongol Empire, our class inquires into many of the facets which characterize the resulting network that once span across large parts of the ancient world. To do so we will take a multi-disciplinary approach to the primary evidence at our disposal, ranging from the works of ancient historians in Greece and Han China, over medieval travel reports, to excavated business letters and other spectacular archaeological artifacts. This will familiarize students with the main methods of historical, art historical and archaeological research, enable them to analyze texts and artifacts themselves, and to understand how present-day scholars reconstruct early processes of globalization across the Ancient world.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01408-4 - The New Muslims of Post-Conquest Iran: Tradition, Memory, and Conversion Sarah Bowen Savant Excerpt More information Introduction Worries were at my stopping place, so I turned my sturdy she-camel toward the White Palace of al-Mada¯ʾin. Consoling myself with good fortune, and sorrowing at the traces of the camp of the clan of Sas¯ an.¯ Successive afflictions reminded me of them; incidents make one remember, make one forget. 1 al-Buh. turı¯ (d. 284/897) Amid the alluvial flatlands east of the Tigris River in Iraq stands a great hulk of a ruin known as the Arch of Khusraw, or to Iranians today as the Taq-i¯ Kisra.¯ When Robert Mignan, in the service of the East India Com- pany, came upon the “Tauk Kesra” in 1827, he described “a magnificent monument of antiquity, surprising the spectator with the perfect state of its preservation, after having braved the warring elements for so many ages; without an emblem to throw any light upon its history; without proof, or character to be traced on any brick or wall.” Mignan noted that “the natives of this country assert” that “the ruins are of the age of Nimrod,” a conclusion that he seems to have found credible.2 In the 1 This qas.ıda¯ is widely repeated in Arabic sources. The lines featured here follow the recen- sion provided by A. J. Arberry in his Arabic Poetry: A Primer for Students (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965), 72–81 (no. 11); they are translated by Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Cities and Nation States
    Global Cities and Nation States Prof Greg Clark & Dr Tim Moonen Tokyo September 2017 The BUSINESS of CITIES Origins of the Global City: Trade and Connectivity • 1300 BC Phoenicians Tyre, Syracuse, Carthage • 500 BC Persian Royal Road Babylon, Susa, Ephesus • 400 BC The Silk Roads Ctesiphon, Samarkand, Balkh • 1300 AD The Mediterranean Venice, Barcelona, Genoa. • 1300 AD Hanseatic League Hamburg, Lubeck, Bruges • 1300 AD South East Asia Canton, Melacca, Surabaya Trade led to Innovation = Transport, Exchange, Currency, Insurance, …. Innovation led to Cities = specialisation, clustering, agglomeration, …. Cities organised to promote trade = Connectivity, Logistics, Merchants, …. The BUSINESS of CITIES 183 Pages, 7 Chapters i. Navigating global cities. ii. Origins: Trade and cities. iii. Global Cities in the ancient world. iv. Global cities in the modern world. v. Understanding global cities. Theory and Benchmarking. vi. Global Cities today. New wave. Why and what? vii. Global City Futures: Challenges and leadership. 5 recurring ingredients of global cities over 5,000 years: • Trade and connectivity • Openness, diverse and entrepreneurial populations • Innovation and Influence • Discovery of new markets • Geo-political opportunity The BUSINESS of CITIES 3 Navigation. Why Now? • New trends in current cycle post 2010 • Global economic change and new dynamics. • Rising Number of Global Cities • Metropolitanisation • Anti-globalisation and populism • Cycles, Waves, and Paths. • Not just Finance and business centres, Capitals or Ports. • 3 new types: Emerged, Emerging and New. The BUSINESS of CITIES Cycles Waves Paths 2010 - 1985 - 1945 2007 1850 1973 1780 - 1850 1914 1492 1650 - - 1780 1650 Antwerp, Amsterdam, Berlin, Bilbao, Liverpool Munich, Seoul, Bangalore, Colombo, Genoa, Guangzhou, Paris, Manchester, Singapore, Barcelona, Nanjing, Istanbul, London, Birmingha Rotterdam, Vienna Tokyo, Toronto Chicago, Brisbane, Tel Venice New York m SydneySydney , Aviv, Melbourne Sao Paulo… Tel Aviv The BUSINESS of CITIES The Silk Roads 400BC – 1600 A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Diocletian's Palace at Split in Light of Sasanian Palace Design
    CHAPTER 11 Rival Powers, Rival Images: Diocletian’s Palace at Split in Light of Sasanian Palace Design Anne Hunnell Chen It is well known that the third century AD saw intense and prolonged conflict between the Romans and their eastern neighbors, the Sasanian Persians.1 What has often remained unrecognized, however, is the Roman court’s poignant use of visual media—both architectural and iconographical—to counter Sasanian claims of superiority on the world stage in this period.2 In particular, a signifi- cant parallel between the ideologically charged palatial spaces built in the two realms has remained overlooked due in large part to our conditioned way of viewing the fortified imperial palaces that began to appear in the eastern part of the Roman Empire in the late third century. Entrenched ideas about one of the touchstone monuments of the late Roman period, Diocletian’s palace at Split, located on the modern Croatian coast, have shaped the discussion of comparable, contemporary imperial resi- dences discovered in the last forty years at Šarkamen and Gamzigrad in east- ern Serbia. For this reason, a fresh look at Diocletian’s palace, informed by new archaeological data and a theoretical approach sensitive to inter- and trans- cultural perspectives, is necessary. Consideration of the Split residence with reference to comparanda both inside and outside the Roman Empire reveals that the design choices made in Roman palaces from the late third and early fourth centuries AD were part of a concerted effort on the part of late Roman 1 Matthew P. Canepa, The Two Eyes of the Earth: Art and Ritual of Kingship Between Rome and Sasanian Iran (Berkeley, 2009); Jan Willem Drijvers, “Rome and the Sasanid Empire: Confrontation and Coexistence,” in A Companion to Late Antiquity, eds.
    [Show full text]