Ardasir's Struggle Against the Parthians. Towards A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ardasir's Struggle Against the Parthians. Towards A Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLVI, 2011 doi: 10.2143/IA.46.0.2084420 ARDASIR’S STRUGGLE AGAINST THE PARTHIANS. TOWARDS A REINTERPRETATION OF THE FIRUZABAD I RELIEF BY Maciej GRABOWSKI (Institute of Archeology, Warsaw University) Abstract: The proposed reinterpretation of the Firuzabad I relief is based on the assumption that we deal with a particular iconographic synopsis of the events that occurred during Ardasir’s war against the Arsacids (c. 220-228). The concept of iconographic summary of several historical events may be traced back to the Achaemenid period (Bisotun relief), and may also be observed in the triumph reliefs of Sapur I. It is thus suggested that each of the three equestrian combat scenes depicted on the Firuzabad I relief recalls one of three major stages of Ardasir’s struggle against the Parthians. Information from textual sources combined with iconographic observations permit to develop a hypothesis concerning the identity of some of the depicted personages, and thus to reveal proper historical context of each scene. New terminus post quem for the Firuzabad I relief is also proposed, this being the year 228 which most probably marks the end of the last phase of the war. Keywords: Sasanian rock reliefs, Firuzabad, Ardashir, Artabanus, Shapur. The earliest Sasanian rock sculptures are two reliefs commissioned by Ardasir I (224-240) and carved on the cliffs of the Tang-e Ab gorge, near the town of Firuzabad (Fars Province). The first one (Firuzabad I) depicts an equestrian combat between three pairs of Persian and Parthian knights (Pl. 1, fig. 1), whereas the second (Firuzabad II) shows the so-called “inves- titure” scene. It is obvious that the location of these monuments on the main route leading to the Firuzabad plain was not accidental for, early in his reign, Ardasir founded a new capital there, Ardasir-Khorra (“Glory of Ardasir”). As both these reliefs were exposed to the public, it might be supposed that, apart from adding splendour to the surroundings of the new royal seat, they also served for propaganda purposes. However, except for some basic ideological concepts such as commem- orating the victory over an enemy (Firuzabad I) and ascending to power 994066_Iran_Antiqua_46_09.indd4066_Iran_Antiqua_46_09.indd 220707 221/06/111/06/11 111:591:59 208 M. GRABOWSKI d I relief by E. Smekens (Ghent University). a b a z u r i Fig. 1. Drawing of the F 994066_Iran_Antiqua_46_09.indd4066_Iran_Antiqua_46_09.indd 220808 221/06/111/06/11 111:591:59 ARDASIR’S STRUGGLE AGAINST THE PARTHIANS 209 (Firuzabad II), the exact meaning of these monumental images remains somewhat obscure. This paper presents an attempt to develop a more com- prehensive interpretation of the first of the above-mentioned reliefs, i.e. Firuzabad I. The new approach toward this particular relief is based on a presumption that the historical aspect of this monument encompasses a much wider scope of events than it has hitherto been considered. Proper studies of the Firuzabad I relief began with the identification of the depicted ruler as Ardasir I, for the first time by E. Herzfeld (Herzfeld 1926: 253-254)1. This view was upheld in further examinations by R. Ghirshman (Ghirshman 1947: 8-13), G. Herrmann (Herrmann 1969: 71-74), W. Hinz (Hinz 1969: 115-119) and later on by L. Vanden Berghe (Vanden Berghe 1984: 62, 125-126) and H. von Gall (von Gall 1990: 20-30). Studies of these scholars, although very significant, focused mainly on iconography. More light on the character and dating of the Firuzabad I relief has not been shed until G. Herrmann’s in-depth research on the sculpture techniques of the Sasanian rock reliefs (Herrmann 1981). Never- theless, precise descriptive and photographic documentation of the dis- cussed relief is yet to be conducted. Dating of the relief According to G. Herrmann, technical traits of the monument, these including in particular shallow relief with good quality modelling, partially polished silhouettes and matte background, point to the conclusion that the Firuzabad I relief represents the earliest development phase of the Sasanian rock sculpture. Some scholars tend to regard this monument as the very first rock relief carved by the order of Ardasir (Herrmann 1981: 156; Vanden Berghe 1984: 62). The issue of absolute dating of the Firuzabad I relief is far more prob- lematic. For although no doubt exists that the subject of the relief recalls the victory of Ardasir over Ardawan IV and the Arsacid dynasty, there is 1 E. Flandin and M. Dieulafoy, to whom we owe first sketches of this relief, attributed it to Bahram II or IV (Dieulafoy 1884: 117). Some uncertainty remained even after E. Herzfeld’s identification of the depicted ruler, and K. Erdmann still attributed the dis- cussed relief to Ardasir II (379-383) (Erdmann 1937: 94). Yet, in his later publications K. Erdmann accepted the attribution proposed by E. Herzfeld (Erdmann 1943: 49-50; 1951: 91-92). 994066_Iran_Antiqua_46_09.indd4066_Iran_Antiqua_46_09.indd 220909 221/06/111/06/11 111:591:59 210 M. GRABOWSKI actually no evidence that the relief was carved immediately after the deci- sive battle with the Parthian ruler in 224. On the other hand, a relatively late date for the discussed relief was proposed by V. G. Lukonin who opted for circa the year 240. His main argument was based on a supposed chronological correlation between the relief and the late series of Ardasir’s coins whose obverses bear the image of the ruler in the same distinctive coiffure as the one shown on the Firuzabad I relief (Lukonin 1977: 147, after von Gall 1990: 27). This reasoning has been, however, undermined by H. von Gall who argued convincingly that in the case of our relief the presence of this coiffure is imposed mainly by the relief’s battle subject, with the lack of a crown or hel- met being a reflection of an ancient Persian war custom according to which the most esteemed commanders fought bare-headed. As such, the royal coif- fure should not be treated as a chronological indicator linking the Firuzabad I relief with the above-mentioned series of coins (von Gall 1990: 27-28). Furthermore, significant differences in style and execution technique between the discussed monument and the last rock relief of Ardasir, Naqs-e Rostam I, carved most probably near the year 240 (Lukonin 1968: 112), show clearly that their contemporaneity is unlikely. Hence, it is most plau- sible that the Firuzabad I relief was carved not later than just several years after the fall of Ardawan IV (224). The in-depth analysis presented in this paper proves that even a more precise estimation of the date is possible. E. Herzfeld’s interpretation A comparison of the emblems adorning the caparisons, quivers and head- gears shown on the Firuzabad I relief with those known from other rock sculptures commissioned by Ardasir I led E. Herzfeld to the conclusion that the Sasanian king depicted on the discussed relief was in fact the founder of the empire, whereas his adversary was the last Parthian ruler – Ardawan IV (c. 213-224) (Pl. 2). Since Tabari states in his chronicle that the Parthian monarch met his death at the hands of Ardasir during the decisive battle on the plain of Hormizdgan2 on the last day of the month of Mihr (28th April 224) 2 Since some other sources give a completely different toponym, we cannot be certain of the present location of the battlefield. Nevertheless, relying on the information con- tained in Bal’ami’s manuscript, A. Sh. Shahbazi suggested that the Hormizdgan plain is situated near the present Ram-Hormoz, east of Ahwaz (Shahbazi 2004: 672-674). 994066_Iran_Antiqua_46_09.indd4066_Iran_Antiqua_46_09.indd 221010 221/06/111/06/11 111:591:59 ARDASIR’S STRUGGLE AGAINST THE PARTHIANS 211 (Nöldeke 1879: 14-15, 411), E. Herzfeld perceived the relief as an illustra- tion of that particular battle (Herzfeld 1926: 253-254). According to Tabari’s description of the battle, the first to attack Ardawan IV’s forces was prince Sapur who himself killed Dadbundad, “Ardawan’s grand vizier”. On these grounds, the second pair depicted in the centre of the relief (Pl. 3) was identified as prince Sapur and his oppo- nent, Dadbundad (Herzfeld 1926: 254, followed by Ghirshman 1947: 9; Herrmann 1969: 73; Hinz 1969: 115; Vanden Berghe 1984: 125-126; von Gall 1990: 21). Although the historical interpretation proposed by E. Herzfeld has been widely accepted in scholarly circles, it is necessary to point out its major weakness. This being its total reliance on solely one textual source, the Chronicle of Tabari. Even though Tabari’s account of the decisive battle proved to be relevant for the interpretation of the rightmost scene, i.e. Ardasir defeating Ardawan IV, it neither mentions anything that could be tentatively applied to the third (leftmost) pair of knights (Pl. 4), nor prop- erly indicates the rank of prince Sapur’s opponent. These deficiencies make E. Herzfeld’s interpretation at least partially invalid and call for resorting to other textual sources. Reinterpretation of the relief The reason for presentation of three monumental equestrian combat scenes to commemorate a single victory is an issue which did not get much attention in the previous studies on the Firuzabad I relief. Yet, this unique iconographic form finds no direct parallel in other Sasanian rock reliefs depicting equestrian combat. These reliefs were in most cases executed as a single scene3 involving mainly a Sasanian king and his opponent, some- times with a standard-bearer in the background and a fallen enemy tram- pled by the royal steed. In search of a reason for the uniqueness of the Firuzabad I relief, one should turn to the peculiar historical background of the monument: Ardasir’s struggle against the Arsacids and their supporters.
Recommended publications
  • Virtual Assyria Dan Lundberg
    Virtual Assyria Dan Lundberg (The content of this site is based on data collected 1996-1997) Illustration: Ann Ahlbom Sundqvist Introduction (2010) Some comments on the re-publishing of this study of Assyrian cultural activities on the Internet – more than 10 years later. This study is based on fieldwork and other data collections that I conducted during the second half of the 1990s. I can truly say that I was impressed by all the web enthusiasts that were striving to create a transnational Assyrian community – a "cyber nation" on the Internet. However, the development has been incredibly fast during the last decades and today (2010) it is hard to imagine the almost science fictional impression that ideas about cyber communities gave back in the nineties. When looking back at the development of the Internet it seems as if the "cyber space" that was announced on the home page of Nineveh On-line 1997 has become less virtual over the years. Today we are living in both worlds – using the Internet for shopping, reading, finding information, communication, playing, dating, etc, etc.The boarder between virtual and real often appears to be diffuse and in fact, not so important any more. Svenskt visarkiv shut down this website in 2008 because we felt we could no longer guarantee that all links were relevant and functioning. The lifespan of articles online can sometimes be quite short. However, we have received many requests to publish it again, an indication that the content is still regarded as important. This new edition has some corrected links and dead links have been deleted, but otherwise the text has not been changed at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version of Article
    STUDIA ORIENTALIA PUBLISHED BY THE FINNISH ORIENTAL SOCIETY 106 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS, AND SCHOLARS Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Edited by Mikko Luukko, Saana Svärd and Raija Mattila HELSINKI 2009 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS AND SCHOLARS clay or on a writing board and the other probably in Aramaic onleather in andtheotherprobably clay oronawritingboard ME FRONTISPIECE 118882. Assyrian officialandtwoscribes;oneiswritingincuneiformo . n COURTESY TRUSTEES OF T H E BRITIS H MUSEUM STUDIA ORIENTALIA PUBLISHED BY THE FINNISH ORIENTAL SOCIETY Vol. 106 OF GOD(S), TREES, KINGS, AND SCHOLARS Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Edited by Mikko Luukko, Saana Svärd and Raija Mattila Helsinki 2009 Of God(s), Trees, Kings, and Scholars: Neo-Assyrian and Related Studies in Honour of Simo Parpola Studia Orientalia, Vol. 106. 2009. Copyright © 2009 by the Finnish Oriental Society, Societas Orientalis Fennica, c/o Institute for Asian and African Studies P.O.Box 59 (Unioninkatu 38 B) FIN-00014 University of Helsinki F i n l a n d Editorial Board Lotta Aunio (African Studies) Jaakko Hämeen-Anttila (Arabic and Islamic Studies) Tapani Harviainen (Semitic Studies) Arvi Hurskainen (African Studies) Juha Janhunen (Altaic and East Asian Studies) Hannu Juusola (Semitic Studies) Klaus Karttunen (South Asian Studies) Kaj Öhrnberg (Librarian of the Society) Heikki Palva (Arabic Linguistics) Asko Parpola (South Asian Studies) Simo Parpola (Assyriology) Rein Raud (Japanese Studies) Saana Svärd (Secretary of the Society)
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Educational Social
    CULTURAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIAL Established 1964 Publication of the Assyrian Foundation of America Volume 43, Number 4, 2019 Books Contents 4 The Lazarists and Daughters of 21 A Son’s Loving Tribute... ComprendreComprendre le M leoyen- Moyen-OrientOrient ClaireClaire Weibel Weibel Yacoub Yacoub La France et les CollectionCollection dirigée dirigée par J.-P. par ChagnollaudJ.-P. Chagnollaud Jonathon Malek QUELLEQUELLE CITOYENNETÉ CITOYENNETÉ LA LAFRANCE FRANCE ET ETLES LES ASSYRO-CHALDÉENS ASSYRO-CHALDÉENS Charity among the Assyro-Chaldeans DANSDANS LES LESCAMPS CAMPS DE RÉFUGIÉSDE RÉFUGIÉS ? ? Qu’enQu’en dit ditla pressela presse ? ? ParmiParmi les Chrétiens les Chrétiens d’Orient, d’Orient, les Arméniens les Arméniens sont sontdevenus devenus familiers familiers Abdulmesih BarAbraham, MSc. Assyro-Chaldéens Les palestiniensLes palestiniens au Liban au Liban aux médiasaux médias et à l’opinionet à l’opinion publique publique française. française. Mais Mais qu’en qu’en est-il est-il des des LALA FRANCEFRANCE Assyro-ChaldéensAssyro-Chaldéens ? Les ?connaît-on Les connaît-on vraiment vraiment ? Sont-ils ? Sont-ils les oubliés les oubliés de de Claire Yacoub Weibel la grandela grande histoire histoire ? ? Claire Yacoub Weibel ETET LES LES ASSYRO-CHALDÉENS ASSYRO-CHALDÉENS Il est unIl est fait un que fait la que presse la presse française, française, toutes toutes tendances tendances confondues, confondues, a parléa parlédes Assyro-Chaldéens,des Assyro-Chaldéens, ces Syro-Mésopotamiens,ces Syro-Mésopotamiens, chrétiens chrétiens 22 Letter from the Assyrian depuisdepuis deux deuxmille milleans. ans. e e Qu’en dit la presse ? Qu’en dit la presse? Dès leDès xix le xixsiècle, siècle, elle répercuteelle répercute abondamment abondamment les récitsles récits des des Qu’en dit la presse ? explorateursexplorateurs et les et événements,les événements, souvent souvent tragiques, tragiques, qui quitouchent touchent les Assyro-Chaldéensles Assyro-Chaldéens aux confinsaux confins des empiresdes empires ottoman ottoman et persan.et persan.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of 'Iraq
    [Distributed to the Official No. : C. 49. 1929. VI. Members of the Council.] [C.P.M.834] Geneva, February 20th, 1929. LEAGUE OF NATIONS CONSTITUTION OF ‘IRAQ (ORGANIC LAW) Note by the Secretary- General : The Secretary-General communicated to the Council, on August 23rd, 1924 (document C.412.1924.VI, C.P.M. 166),1 a letter from the British Government transmitting a translation of the Organic Law of ‘Iraq passed by the Constituent Assembly of ‘Iraq on July 10th, 1924. In a letter dated November 28th, 1928, the British Government transmitted the following document : The ‘Iraq Constitution, March 21st, 1925, recently published by the Government of ‘Iraq. The British Government points out, in the above-mentioned letter, that the publication of the document in question was necessitated by the discovery of considerable discrepancies between the Arabic text of the Organic Law, as passed by the ‘Iraq Constituent Assembly in July 1924, and the English translation which was communicated to the Secretariat in 1924. The British Government adds that the new text embodies the modifications introduced by the Organic Law Amendment Law, 1925,2 and was approved by the ‘Iraq Government as superseding all translations of the law hitherto published. The Secretary-General has the honour to communicate to the Council the text of the document transmitted by the British Government on November 28th, 1928. 1 See Official Journal, November 1924, page 1759. * The Organic Law Amendment Law, 1925, was published as an Appendix to the Annual Report on the Adminis­ tration of ‘Iraq for 1925, pages 175-177. S.d.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Historical Traces in the Doctrina Addai
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 9.1, 51-127 © 2006 [2009] by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press POSSIBLE HISTORICAL TRACES IN THE DOCTRINA ADDAI ILARIA L. E. RAMELLI CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF THE SACRED HEART, MILAN 1 ABSTRACT The Teaching of Addai is a Syriac document convincingly dated by some scholars in the fourth or fifth century AD. I agree with this dating, but I think that there may be some points containing possible historical traces that go back even to the first century AD, such as the letters exchanged by king Abgar and Tiberius. Some elements in them point to the real historical context of the reign of Abgar ‘the Black’ in the first century. The author of the Doctrina might have known the tradition of some historical letters written by Abgar and Tiberius. [1] Recent scholarship often dates the Doctrina Addai, or Teaching of Addai,2 to the fourth century AD or the early fifth, a date already 1 This is a revised version of a paper delivered at the SBL International Meeting, Groningen, July 26 2004, Ancient Near East section: I wish to thank very much all those who discussed it and so helped to improve it, including the referees of the journal. 2 Extant in mss of the fifth-sixth cent. AD: Brit. Mus. 935 Add. 14654 and 936 Add. 14644. Ed. W. Cureton, Ancient Syriac Documents (London 1864; Piscataway: Gorgias, 2004 repr.), 5-23; another ms. of the sixth cent. was edited by G. Phillips, The Doctrine of Addai, the Apostle (London, 1876); G.
    [Show full text]
  • Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region”
    Islamic Republic of Iran Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization ICHHTO “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” for inscription on the World Heritage List (Additional Information) UNESCO World Heritage Convention 2017 1 In the name of God 2 Evaluation of the nomination of the “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” (Islamic Republic of Iran) for inscription on the World Heritage List This report is submitted in response to the ICOMOS letter of GB/AS/1568-AddInf-1, dated 28September 2017 on the additional information for the nomination of Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region. The Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization is grateful to ICOMOS for its devotion to conservation and preservation of historic monuments and sites. The objective of this detailed report is to clarify the issues raised by ICOMOS in the aforementioned letter. Additional information for clarification on: - Serial approach - Risks and Factors affecting the property - Protection - Management - Monitoring 1- Serial approach Could the State Party kindly provide information on the rationale, methodology and criteria (here not referring to the nomination criteria), which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination? Could the State Party kindly outline the contribution of each site component, to the overall Outstanding Universal Value in the substantial, scientific and discernible way, as outlined in paragraph 137b of the Operational Guidelines? For clarifying, the question will be explained in the parts of (1-a) and (1-b) in details: 1-a: Rationale, methodology and criteria which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination: The rationale which guided the selection of the component sites is based on a methodology which takes into account their historical characteristics and at the same time considers their association with the regional landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Ba'ath Propaganda During the Iran-Iraq War Jennie Matuschak [email protected]
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses Spring 2019 Nationalism and Multi-Dimensional Identities: Ba'ath Propaganda During the Iran-Iraq War Jennie Matuschak [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Matuschak, Jennie, "Nationalism and Multi-Dimensional Identities: Ba'ath Propaganda During the Iran-Iraq War" (2019). Honors Theses. 486. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/486 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. iii Acknowledgments My first thanks is to my advisor, Mehmet Döşemeci. Without taking your class my freshman year, I probably would not have become a history major, which has changed my outlook on the world. Time will tell whether this is good or bad, but for now I am appreciative of your guidance. Also, thank you to my second advisor, Beeta Baghoolizadeh, who dealt with draft after draft and provided my thesis with the critiques it needed to stand strongly on its own. Thank you to my friends for your support and loyalty over the past four years, which have pushed me to become the best version of myself. Most importantly, I value the distractions when I needed a break from hanging out with Saddam. Special shout-out to Andrew Raisner for painstakingly reading and editing everything I’ve written, starting from my proposal all the way to the final piece.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modern History of Iraq
    The Modern History of Iraq THE MODERN HISTORY OF IRAQ Fourth Edition Phebe Marr Ibrahim al- Marashi California State University, San Marcos New York London First published 2017 by Westview Press Published 2018 by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2017 Taylor & Francis All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Every effort has been made to secure required permissions for all text, images, maps, and other art reprinted in this volume. A CIP catalog record for the print version of this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN 13: 978- 0-8133- 5006- 6 (pbk) Contents List of Illustrations, ix Preface, xi A Note on Transliteration, xvi 1. The Land and People of Modern Iraq 1 Legacy of the Past, 1 The Land, 5 The People, 9 2. The British Mandate, 1920–1932 17 The British Occupation and the Institutions of the Indian School, 18 The 1920 Revolt and Its Results, 19 The Kurdish Problem, 23 Oil and the Slow Pace of Development, 24 The Nationalist Movement: Composition and Outlook, 25 The 1930 Treaty and the End of the Mandate, 27 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthian-Roman Bipolarism: Some Considerations for a Historical Perspective
    Revista Mundo Antigo – Ano IV, V. 4, N° 08 – Dezembro – 2015 – ISSN 2238-8788 The Parthian-Roman bipolarism: some considerations for a historical perspective. Giacomo Tabita1 Submetido em Novembro/2015 Aceito em Novembro/2015 ABSTRACT: During the 1st-3rd centuries AD the Euphrates’s River was the so-called Latin Limes of the late Roman Empire (Isaac 1988: 124-147; Frezouls 1980: 357-386, 371; Gray 1973: 24-40; Mayerson 1986: 35-47; Invernizzi 1986: 357-381; Valtz 1987: 81-89), understood as a dynamic geo-political and cultural border with both military and trading function, where the interfaced cultural areas were defined by the coexistence, interaction and conflict of several ideologies which are at the basis of the fights between Romans and Parthians aiming to the control of the territories on the Middle-Euphrates’s area. Rome occupied Dura Europos during the AD 165 obtaining the control on the Euphrates area and during the AD 194-195 and AD 197-199 Septimius Severus enlarged the extension of the areas controlled by Rome, overlapping on the limit of the Euphrates, therefore determining the Parthian giving ground on the Middle Euphrates (Oates 1968: 67-92). The strategic advantage obtained by the Romans allowed them also to build the fortified post of Kifrin (Valtz 1987: 81-89), seen from a political and military point of view as a means to enforce and to advance the eastern frontier of the empire on the pre-existent settlement. KEYWORDS: 3rd century AD,_Middle Euphrates,_Romans, _Parthians,_Septimius Severus. 1 Ph.D at Turin University and actually he is an affiliated member at the Heritage research group of the Cambridge University (UK), Archaeologist, e-mail address: [email protected] NEHMAAT http://www.nehmaat.uff.br 131 http://www.pucg.uff.br CHT/UFF-ESR Revista Mundo Antigo – Ano IV, V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the Terms 'Syria(N)'
    Parole de l’Orient 36 (2011) 111-125 THE ORIGIN OF THE TERMS ‘SYRIA(N)’ & SŪRYOYO ONCE AGAIN BY Johny MESSO Since the nineteenth century, a number of scholars have put forward various theories about the etymology of the basically Greek term ‘Syrian’ and its Aramaic counterpart Sūryoyo1. For a proper understanding of the his- tory of these illustrious names in the two different languages, it will prove useful to analyze their backgrounds separately from one another. First, I will discuss the most persuasive theory as regards the origin of the word ‘Syria(n)’. Secondly, two hypotheses on the Aramaic term Sūryoyo will be examined. In the final part of this paper, a new contextual backdrop and sharply demarcated period will be proposed that helps us to understand the introduction of this name into the Aramaic language. 1. THE ETYMOLOGY OF THE GREEK TERM FOR ‘SYRIA(N)’ Due to their resemblance, the ancient Greeks had always felt that ‘Syr- ia(n)’ and ‘Assyria(n)’ were somehow onomastically related to each other2. Nöldeke was the first modern scholar who, in 1871, seriously formulated the theory that in Greek ‘Syria(n)’ is a truncated form of ‘Assyria(n)’3. Even if his view has a few minor difficulties4, most writers still adhere to it. 1) Cf., e.g., the review (albeit brief and inexhaustive) by A. SAUMA, “The origin of the Word Suryoyo-Syrian”, in The Harp 6:3 (1993), pp. 171-197; R.P. HELM, ‘Greeks’ in the Neo-Assyrian Levant and ‘Assyria’ in Early Greek Writers (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation; University of Pennsylvania, 1980), especially chapters 1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Assyrians: Indigenous People in Distress
    Home | News | Bet-Nahren, Assyria Indigenous People in Distress by Frederick A. Aprim — activist, author, historian. | profile | writings | website Posted: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 at 11:05 AM UT | Printed: April 04, 2003 | Updated: August 24, 2018 Contents Indigenous People in Distress Preface Introduction Section 1: Iraq Section 2: Turkey Section 3: Syria Conclusion Appendix 1: Churches Destroyed by the Ba'ath Regime in Iraq Appendix 2: Assyrian Villages Destroyed by the Ba'ath Regime in Iraq Assyrian Villages and Monasteries PREFACE Throughout the media coverage of Operation Iraqi Freedom, the emphasis continues to be predominantly on the oppression of the Iraqi Ba'ath regime against the Shi'aa Arabs and Kurds. The Indigenous People in Distress world, despite to a very limited cases, have Edited by Fred Aprim | PDF continued to neglect the suffering of the Assyrians, the indigenous people of Iraq. Details: Paperback, 91 pages, in English Dimensions: 8.5" x 5.5" (in inches) When the thought for an urgent need for the publication of a booklet about the suffering ISBN: 0974445061 of the Assyrians came about, I was given the Publisher: Assyrian Academic Society opportunity and responsibility of gathering Published date: September, 2003 information and putting it together. In doing so, I used material from many trustworthy Assyrian web sites such as www.aina.org (AINA), www.atour.com (Atour), and www.zindamagazine.com (Zinda). Other resources were information I have gathered throughout the years and are part of my upcoming book. I hope that this humble work will give the reader a general idea about the Assyrians.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Monarchy As Antithetical Terms?: Iraq's Elections of September 1954 Bishop, Elizabeth
    www.ssoar.info Democracy and monarchy as antithetical terms?: Iraq's elections of September 1954 Bishop, Elizabeth Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bishop, E. (2013). Democracy and monarchy as antithetical terms?: Iraq's elections of September 1954. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 13(2), 313-326. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-447205 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Democracy and Monarchy as Antithetical Terms? 313 Democracy and Monarchy as Antithetical Terms? Iraq’s Elections of September 1954 ELIZABETH BISHOP Historian Bernard Lewis observes: ”Americans tend to see democracy and monarchy in antithetical terms; in Europe, however, democracy has fared better in constitutional monarchies than in republics”1. Let us take this opportunity to consider elections held in the Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq during the Cold War, in order to assess how”democracy” fared during the years that country was a constitutional monarchy. As we do so, let’s keep Saad Eskander’s words in mind: ”You cannot have democracy in Iraq by just holding elections... You need to enable Iraq’s core of citizens to have free access to information, absolutely all, all of legislation.
    [Show full text]