DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft National Transport Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft National Transport Strategy European Union Framework Contract Beneficiaries 2013-Lot 2 Development of National Strategy for the Transport Sector Letter of Contract N. IPAOPRD2007-2013-4.2-LOT2-22 Draft National Transport Strategy December 2018 i This project is funded This project is realised by ARS Progetti by the European Union Framework Contract BENEF 2013 Lot 2 Programme Name IPA COMPONENT I OPERATION PROGRAMME FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT (OPRD) Project Name FWC “Development of National Strategy for the Transport Sector “ FWC BENEF 2013 – Lot 2: Transport and Infrastructures Reference No: IPAOPRD2007-2013-4.2-LOT2-22 Contract Number 12-7422/1 Project Duration 10 months Project Commencement Date 20/02/2017 Project End Date 22/12/2017 Name: MoTC CFCD ARS Progetti S.p.A. Role: Beneficiary Contracting Authority Contractor Address: Dame Gruev No. 6 Dame Gruev No. 12 Via Durban, 2 1000 Skopje, Republic 1000 Skopje, Republic 00144 Rome, Italy of Macedonia of Macedonia Telephone: +389 2 3145532 +389 2 3255400 +39 06 57300679 Fax: E-mail: goran.temovski@mtc. Radica.koceva@financ f.sancilio@arsprogetti. gov.mk e.gov.mk com Contact Person: Goran Temovski Radica Koceva Furio Valerio Sancilio Overall Objective To improve the economic efficiency, safety and accessibility of transportation whilst managing the environmental impact of existing and future transport activity and ensuring integration with other sector policies. Purpose To develop actions that address weaknesses in the transport sector at a Regional and National Level. The actions shall cover the period from 2018 until 2030, and shall acknowledge the pipeline of projects and policies that have already been agreed and which it is intended will be delivered during the period of the Strategy. Expected Results Scoping Report; Digital Databank; Transport Model, Transport Modelling Report and Transport Model Manual; Problem Analysis Report; and Draft National Strategy for the Transport Sector. SEA report Key Activities 1 Inception 2 Scoping 3 Data collection 4 Stakeholder consultation 5 Transport model 6 Problem analysis and objectives 7 Development of measures 8 Preparation of the strategy 9 SEA Procedure and consultation Key Stakeholders MoTC ii iii This document has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of ARS Progetti S.p.A. and its consortium partners and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. iv Abbreviations & Acronyms AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic CA Contracting Authority CFCD Central Financing and Contracting Department within Ministry of Finance MoTC Ministry of Transport and Communications EUD Delegation of the European Union EC European Commission EU European Union IPA Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization OPRD Multi-Annual Operational Programme “Regional Development” EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EIB European Invest Bank WB World Bank IFI International Financial Institution CBA Cost Benefit Analysis MoEPP Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning SEETO South-east european transport opservatory TeTC Treaty for establishing transport community NGO Non-Government Organisation PCU Passenger Car Units SEA Strategic Environment Analysis v FWC Framework Contractor PSC Project Steering Committee PRAG Practical Guide to Contract procedures for EU external actions ToR Terms of Reference NTS National Transport Strategy CWR Continuous Welded Rails UIC Union Internationale des Chemins de Fer (International Union of Railways) TSI Technical Standards for Interoperability HTV Heavy Truck Vehicles SSO Statistical State Office ITS Intelligent Transport System NPAA National Program for adoption of the Acquis PESR Public Enterprise for State Roads PERI-M Public Enterprise Railway Infrastructure-Macedonia HTV Heavy Truck Vehicles SO Specific Objectives GO General Objectives MI Measure Infrastructure RM Regulatory measure OSM Operation and service measure NTS National Transport Strategy vi Table of Contents 1. PART 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Guiding Principles ............................................................................................... 13 1.1.1. Goal of the National Transport Strategy .............................................................. 13 1.1.2. Objectives ....................................................................................................... 17 1.2 Development of the Transport Sector – State of play .............................................. 20 1.2.1. Characteristics of the Transport Sector ............................................................... 20 1.2.2. Development of the Transport Sector ................................................................. 20 1.3 Legal Context of transport development ............................................................... 26 1.3.1. Regulatory framework ........................................................................................... 26 1.3.2. Institutional Framework ......................................................................................... 27 2. PART 2: Transport Infrastructure related Measures ............................................................ 31 2.1 Data Collection .................................................................................................. 31 2.1.1. Existing conditions of transport infrastructure .......................................................... 31 2.2 Problem Analysis (infrastructure) ......................................................................... 36 2.2.1. Connectivity of Transport Network ..................................................................... 36 2.2.2. Safety of transport sector .................................................................................. 43 2.2.3. Transport system interoperability ...................................................................... 47 2.2.4. Border crossings ............................................................................................... 53 2.2.5. Weights and Limits on the road and rail network ................................................. 57 2.2.6. Conclusions of Actual Situation .......................................................................... 59 2.3 Proposed Measures (infrastructure) ..................................................................... 62 3. PART 3: Transport Sector Measures (operation and managment) ......................................... 67 3.1 Data collection for transport operations ............................................................... 67 3.2 Problem Analysis (operation and management) ..................................................... 85 3.3 Proposed Measures (legislation, O&M) ................................................................. 97 PART 4: The Strategy ...................................................................................................... 105 4.1. Overview of the Strategy .................................................................................. 105 4.2 Monitoring and evaluation ................................................................................ 106 ANNEX 1 5. Transport Scenarios .................................................................................................. 117 5.1. Description of the Do Something scenarios 2022, 2025 and 2030 ......................... 117 vii 5.2. Effect of implementing Do Something scenarios on modal share ................................. 125 5.3 Effect of implementing Do Something scenarios on emissions ............................... 129 ANNEX 2 6 Implementation Plan .................................................................................................. 130 viii List of Figures Figure 1. Share of local, regional and trunk roads in the total length of road network .................... 31 Figure 2 Railway network .................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 3. Official operation places for passenger and freight trains .................................................. 34 Figure 4. SEETO map for Comprehensive/Core network – Airport, Seaport and IWW Port ............. 35 Figure 5. TEN-T Core Network Corridors passing through Republic of Macedonia (Road & Rail) .... 37 Figure 6. Road network on the TEN-T Corridor VIII and X, X-d ........................................................... 38 Figure 7. SEETO – South East Europe Core Network Links Roads - 2013 ............................................ 39 Figure 8. SEETO map for Comprehensive/Core road network to the Western Balkans - 2016 ......... 39 Figure 9. SEETO – South East Europe Core Network Links Railways - 2013 ....................................... 42 Figure 10. SEETO map for Comprehensive / Core rail network to the Western Balkans – 2016 ...... 42 Figure 11. Container traffic in sea ports of SEETO region (Source: Western Balkans Intermodal Study, 2016) .......................................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 12. Current main intermodal chains in SEETO region in 2013 ................................................. 48 Figure 13. Planned intermodal terminal in the station Trubarevo..................................................... 50 Figure 14. Proposals of the main intermodal terminals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Macedonia: Not out of the Woods Yet
    Update Briefing Europe Briefing N°37 Skopje/Brussels, 25 February 2005 Macedonia: Not out of the Woods Yet I. OVERVIEW the two parties forced a 7 November 2004 referendum vote on the proposed law. Prime Minister Vlado Buckovski and representatives of Although VMRO was a signatory to the original peace his government and the opposition converged in Brussels agreement, it used the pre-referendum period to question on 14 February 2005 to hand over Macedonia's response sharply the government's performance and the general to the European Commission's 3,000-item questionnaire, wisdom of power-sharing among the ethnic communities. the latest stage in the EU membership application, The government worked to reassure its supporters and which was formally submitted almost a year ago. The argued that its plans would guarantee fast track economic occasion was celebrated by a concert starring Macedonian growth, European integration and better governance. musicians at an exclusive Brussels venue. Appropriately The emergence of Albanian paramilitaries on the enough for St. Valentine's Day, the relationship with the outskirts of Skopje increased tensions and gave rise to EU had taken on a new depth, but nuptials are far from concerns that Macedonia's young and fragile multi-ethnic concluded. The considerable progress Macedonia has democracy might be at serious risk. made is still fragile. The crucial decentralisation process requires careful implementation, and the coalition A strategically-timed U.S. decision to recognise the government and its constituent parties should apply a country's official name as "Macedonia" helped to ensure number of confidence building measures.
    [Show full text]
  • TA to Connectivity in the Western Balkans Europeaid/137850/IH/SER
    1 TA to Connectivity in the Western Balkans EuropeAid/137850/IH/SER/MULTI Sub-Project Code: CONNECTA-TRA-CRM-REG-01 Area: Connectivity Transport Reform Measures Preparation of Road Safety Inspection and Audit Plans for core/comprehensive road network in Western Balkans (WB6) and Pilots FINAL REPORT – ROAD SAFETY INSPECTIONS 30 May 2018 2 Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description 1 23/03/2018 Stelios Jesper Mertner Kostas RSI Draft Report Efstathiadis Georgiou (Task. Manager) 2 16/05/2018 Stelios Jesper Mertner Kostas RSI Final Report Efstathiadis Georgiou (Task. Manager) 3 30/05/2018 Stelios Jesper Mertner Kostas RSI Final Report Efstathiadis Georgiou (Task. Manager) Information Class: EU Standard The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald Connecta Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This document is issued for the party, which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party, which commissioned it. 3 Contents 1 SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Component 1- Purpose and Objectives .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood Ties: Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878
    BLOOD TIES BLOOD TIES Religion, Violence, and the Politics of Nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 I˙pek Yosmaog˘lu Cornell University Press Ithaca & London Copyright © 2014 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2014 by Cornell University Press First printing, Cornell Paperbacks, 2014 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Yosmaog˘lu, I˙pek, author. Blood ties : religion, violence,. and the politics of nationhood in Ottoman Macedonia, 1878–1908 / Ipek K. Yosmaog˘lu. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-5226-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8014-7924-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Macedonia—History—1878–1912. 2. Nationalism—Macedonia—History. 3. Macedonian question. 4. Macedonia—Ethnic relations. 5. Ethnic conflict— Macedonia—History. 6. Political violence—Macedonia—History. I. Title. DR2215.Y67 2013 949.76′01—dc23 2013021661 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fibers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Paperback printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Josh Contents Acknowledgments ix Note on Transliteration xiii Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace
    The Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and the Idea for Autonomy for Macedonia and Adrianople Thrace, 1893-1912 By Martin Valkov Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. Tolga Esmer Second Reader: Prof. Roumen Daskalov CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2010 “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii Abstract The current thesis narrates an important episode of the history of South Eastern Europe, namely the history of the Internal Macedonian-Adrianople Revolutionary Organization and its demand for political autonomy within the Ottoman Empire. Far from being “ancient hatreds” the communal conflicts that emerged in Macedonia in this period were a result of the ongoing processes of nationalization among the different communities and the competing visions of their national projects. These conflicts were greatly influenced by inter-imperial rivalries on the Balkans and the combination of increasing interference of the Great European Powers and small Balkan states of the Ottoman domestic affairs. I argue that autonomy was a multidimensional concept covering various meanings white-washed later on into the clean narratives of nationalism and rebirth.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensor Project and Consultation on Eurorap Results in Croatia
    SENSoR project and consultation on EuroRAP results in Croatia Olivera Djordjevic, Make Roads Safe Hellas (MRSH) and Marko Ševrović, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences 1 2/40 This presentation • The SENSoR project in South East Europe • EuroRAP methodology – brief introduction • Presentation and consultation on preliminary SENSoR EuroRAP results in Croatia • Potential improvements areas • Discussion 3/40 Make Roads Safe Hellas Make Roads Safe Hellas is a new non-profit organization founded in 2010, Chania-Crete. • Member of the Global Make Roads Safe campaign; • Signatory of European Road Safety Charter; • Member of EuroRAP; • The Lead Partner of SENSOR Project. SENSoR- South East Neighbourhood Safe Routes • Albania • Bosnia & Herzegovina • Bulgaria • Croatia • FYR Macedonia • Greece • Hungary • Moldova • Montenegro • Romania • Serbia • Slovakia • Slovenia 4 • Ukraine 5/40 SENSoR Key Data Project Budget: 1,452,126.50 EUR Project Duration: 24 months Project end: Sept. 2014 Road Survey & Star Rating targets Country Coverage Surveys Greece 3.500km Slovakia 2.500km Slovenia 3.150km Hungary 3.000km Bulgaria 620km Romania 540km Serbia 138km FYROM 548km Bosnia & 352km Herzegovina Montenegro 555km Albania 533km Croatia 481km Total 15.917km 6 7/40 8/40 Communicating our work We send our messages… National and local politicians and stakeholders recognise and support SENSOR as: ….an important project which is being carried out to SAVE LIVES! 9/40 www.sensorproject.eu Follow SENSOR activities at the web interactive map Press Releases Achaia
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Lina Konstantinopoulou
    Lina Konstantinopoulou Secretary General, EuroRAP The road safety potential of big data: Ai-RAP and achieving the UN Road Safety Targets About EuroRAP • International Not For profit Association (AISBL) ‘’A Europe free of high-risk roads’’ EuroRAP Shared Vision in Europe The Human Impact of Road Crashes UN Global Road Safety Performance Targets Supporting RAP Protocols What is our Challenge? • Where are crashes happening now and how severe are they? • How safe are the roads for all road users considering road design, volume and speed? • What is the performance tracking to drive change and measure success. How EuroRAP Can Help RISK MAPS STAR RATING INVESTMENT PLANS PERFORMANCE TRACKING • Colour coded map showing • Based on road inspection • Considers 90 proven road • Regular risk mapping or star the where people are dying data improvement options rating enables performance monitoring and where their crash risk • Simple and objective • A Safer Roads Investment is greatest measure of the level of safety Plan (SRIP) prioritises and • Enables celebration of • Can inform priorities across which is ‘built-in’ to the road costs improvement options success and action to be all pillars of road safety can improve Star Ratings and taken to address persistently • Can be completed in the high risk roads action (management, absence of crash data save lives infrastructure, vehicles, road users and post-crash • Five-star road segments are care) the safest while one-star are the least safe Risk Mapping: harnessing existing crash data 1,487,017km of Risk
    [Show full text]
  • On the Basis of Article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, No
    On the basis of article 65 of the Law on Real Estate Cadastre („Official Gazette of Republic of Macedonia”, no. 55/13), the Steering Board of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre has enacted REGULATION FOR THE MANNER OF CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES AND FOR DETERMINING THE CADASTRE MUNICIPALITIES WHICH ARE MAINTAINED IN THE CENTER FOR REC SKOPJE AND THE SECTORS FOR REAL ESTATE CADASTRE IN REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Article 1 This Regulation hereby prescribes the manner of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, as well as the determining of the cadastre municipalities which are maintained in the Center for Real Estate Cadastre – Skopje and the Sectors for Real Estate Cadastre in Republic of Macedonia. Article 2 (1) For the purpose of changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities, the Government of Republic of Macedonia shall enact a decision. (2) The decision stipulated in paragraph (1) of this article shall be enacted by the Government of Republic of Macedonia at the proposal of the Agency for Real Estate Cadastre (hereinafter referred to as: „„the Agency„„). (3) The Agency is to submit the proposal stipulated in paragraph (2) of this article along with a geodetic report for survey of the boundary line, produced under ex officio procedure by experts employed at the Agency. Article 3 (1) The Agency is to submit a proposal decision for changing the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities in cases when, under a procedure of ex officio, it is identified that the actual condition/status of the boundaries of the cadastre municipalities is changed and does not comply with the boundaries drawn on the cadastre maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Post» – Skopje MKA MK
    Parcel Post Compendium Online MK - Republic of North Macedonia State-owned joint stock company for postal traffic MKA «Macedonian Post» – Skopje Basic Services CARDIT Carrier documents international Yes transport – origin post 1 Maximum weight limit admitted RESDIT Response to a CARDIT – destination No 1.1 Surface parcels (kg) 30 post 1.2 Air (or priority) parcels (kg) 30 6 Home delivery 2 Maximum size admitted 6.1 Initial delivery attempt at physical Yes delivery of parcels to addressee 2.1 Surface parcels 6.2 If initial delivery attempt unsuccessful, Yes 2.1.1 2m x 2m x 2m No card left for addressee (or 3m length & greatest circumference) 6.3 Addressee has option of paying taxes or Yes 2.1.2 1.5m x 1.5m x 1.5m Yes duties and taking physical delivery of the (or 3m length & greatest circumference) item 2.1.3 1.05m x 1.05m x 1.05m No 6.4 There are governmental or legally (or 2m length & greatest circumference) binding restrictions mean that there are certain limitations in implementing home 2.2 Air parcels delivery. 2.2.1 2m x 2m x 2m No 6.5 Nature of this governmental or legally (or 3m length & greatest circumference) binding restriction. 2.2.2 1.5m x 1.5m x 1.5m Yes (or 3m length & greatest circumference) 2.2.3 1.05m x 1.05m x 1.05m No 7 Signature of acceptance (or 2m length & greatest circumference) 7.1 When a parcel is delivered or handed over Supplementary services 7.1.1 a signature of acceptance is obtained Yes 3 Cumbersome parcels admitted No 7.1.2 captured data from an identity card are No registered 7.1.3 another form of evidence
    [Show full text]
  • Trajan Belev-Goce
    Trajan Belev – Goce By Gjorgi Dimovski-Colev Translated by Elizabeth Kolupacev Stewart 1 The Historical Archive – Bitola and the Municipal Council SZBNOV – Bitola “Unforgotten” Editions By Gjorgi Dimovski–Colev Trajan Belev – Goce Publisher board Vasko Dimovski Tode Gjoreski vice president Zlate Gjorshevski Jovan Kochankovski Aleksandar Krstevski Gjorgji Lumburovski (Master) Cane Pavlovski president Jovo Prijevik Kiril Siljanovski Ilche Stojanovski Gjorgji Tankovski Jordan Trpkovski Editorial Board Stevo Gadzhovski Vasko Dimovski Tode Gjoreski Master Gjorgji Lumburovski chief editor Jovan Kochanovski Aleksandar Krstevski, alternate chief editor Gjorgji Tankovski Reviewers Dr Trajche Grujoski Dr Vlado Ivanovski 2 On the first edition of the series “The Unforgotten.” The history of our people and particularly our most recent history which is closely connected to the communist Party of Yugoslavia and SKOJ bursting with impressive stories of heroism, self-sacrifice, and many other noble human feats which our new generations must learn about. Among the precious example of political consciousness and sacrifice in the great and heroic struggle our future generations do not need to have regard to the distant past but can learn from the actions of youths involved in the living reality of the great liberation struggle. The publication of the series “Unforgotten” represents a program of the Municipal Council of the Union of the fighters of the NOB – Bitola. The series is comprised of many publications of famous people and events from the recent revolutionary past of Bitola and its environs. People who in the Liberation battle and the socialist revolution showed themselves to be heroes and their names and their achievements are celebrated in the “Unforgotten” series by the people.
    [Show full text]
  • "Shoot the Teacher!": Education and the Roots of the Macedonian Struggle
    "SHOOT THE TEACHER!" EDUCATION AND THE ROOTS OF THE MACEDONIAN STRUGGLE Julian Allan Brooks Bachelor of Arts, University of Victoria, 1992 Bachelor of Education, University of British Columbia, 200 1 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of History O Julian Allan Brooks 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Julian Allan Brooks Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: "Shoot the Teacher!" Education and the Roots of the Macedonian Struggle Examining Committee: Chair: Professor Mark Leier Professor of History Professor AndrC Gerolymatos Senior Supervisor Professor of History Professor Nadine Roth Supervisor Assistant Professor of History Professor John Iatrides External Examiner Professor of International Relations Southern Connecticut State University Date Approved: DECLARATION OF PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection, and, without changing the content, to translate the thesislproject or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUCTION of the STATE ROAD A1 GRADSKO – PRILEP SECTION R
    CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE ROAD A1 GRADSKO – PRILEP SECTION r. RAEC - DRENOVO REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FOR STATE ROADS Project: CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE ROAD A1, GRADSKO – PRILEP SECTION: FROM BRIDGE OF THE RIVER RAEC TO INTERCHANGE DRENOVO FINAL STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN (SEP) May, 2014 1 Page STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATE ROAD A1 GRADSKO – PRILEP SECTION r. RAEC - DRENOVO CONTENT LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ........................................................................................................................... 4 3. LEGAL AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.1. MACEDONIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK......................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 EBRD POLICY FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................................................................... 9 4. PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS ....................................................................................................................................... 9 4.1. IDENTIFICATION OF STAKEHOLDERS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]