VACCINES for ROADS Second Edition NEW

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

VACCINES for ROADS Second Edition NEW VACCINES FOR ROADS Second edition NEW WE CAN CREATE A WORLD FREE OF HIGH-RISK ROADS A WORLD FREE OF HIGH RISK ROADS | irap.org NEW * LOCAL SAFETY CHAMPIONS LEADING ROAD ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES IN 70 COUNTRIES * RISK ON HALF A MILLION KILOMETRES OF ROADS ASSESSED * STRATEGIES TO PREVENT 50,000 DEATHS AND SERIOUS INJURIES A YEAR IN LOW-INCOME AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES * STAR RATINGS BEING USED TO DESIGN SAFE NEW ROADS irap.org | A WORLD FREE OF HIGH RISK ROADS 3,500 people will die on the world’s roads associations and road authorities leading The good news is that Safer Roads to have lasting partnerships with many today and 100,000 more will be seriously in road safety. The programme created Investment Plans are making the solutions road authorities, automobile associations, injured or disabled. But road death is not simple and objective measures of road equally clear. Construction of just 65km of multilateral development banks, research inevitable—it is preventable. safety risk and highlighted the vital footpaths on high-risk roads in Costa Rica, institutes, donors and non-government role that road infrastructure can play for instance, would prevent almost 3,000 organisations. A network of accredited There has never been a more opportune in preventing crashes and reducing deaths and serious injuries over 20 years road safety professionals and companies moment to tackle this serious and the severity of injuries. The approach and save $215 million in crash costs. Much capable of competitively bidding to rapidly worsening public health crisis by spread rapidly throughout Europe, then of this cost would otherwise be borne provide high-quality iRAP assessments is fundamentally changing the inherent to Australia, the United States and New by an already stretched health sector. also growing. safety of road systems around the world. Zealand, with local experts introducing The plans are helping to demonstrate Causes of road trauma are well known, as their own innovative improvements. The that by investing in safer roads, the The central message of Vaccines for are ‘vaccines’ to prevent them. We know focus then shifted to low-income and social and economic burden on families, Roads is simple: large-scale, immediate there is enormous potential to generate middle-income countries, where the road communities, workplaces and hospitals improvements to high-risk roads will save large social and economic returns from trauma crisis is most urgent. It culminated can be significantly lessened. By setting lives today and long into the future. better investment; the United Nations in the first edition of Vaccines for Roads ambitious policy targets such as the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011- in 2008 which presented pioneering work elimination of one-star and two-star roads Together, we can create a world free of 2020 brings unprecedented international in Chile, Costa Rica, Malaysia and South by 2020 or a requirement that all new high-risk roads. leadership and political-will to the cause. Africa. roads achieve four-stars, countries can We can, and must, make this happen. create a legacy of safe roads for future iRAP is now a global programme of local generations. iRAP is an international charity dedicated road safety champions leading RAP to creating a world free of high-risk roads. activities in more than 70 countries. Some As a registered charity, iRAP benefits from We work on a global scale and are moving half a million kilometres of roads have the generous financial support of the FIA urgently to save lives. We act on sound been assessed. This second edition of Foundation, the Road Safety Fund which research and compelling evidence. Road Vaccines for Roads describes that work, is jointly managed by the FIA Foundation Assessment Programmes (RAPs) are a with a particular focus on results in low- and the World Health Organisation, and catalyst for change, providing political income and middle-income countries. the Global Road Safety Facility. This leaders, policy makers and road builders Sadly, about half the roads assessed in support enables us to provide safety tools with the social, economic and engineering these countries are rated in the highest risk and software to low-income and middle- evidence and tools needed to transform bands: one-star or two-stars. The reasons income countries free-of-charge and give entire road networks. for this are clear and include the fact that the programmatic support needed to 84% of the roads where pedestrians are ensure that assessments are completed RAPs started with EuroRAP in 2001, as present have no footpaths. to the same, high-quality consistency Rob McInerney a partnership between automobile around the world. We are very fortunate Chief Executive Officer Numerous publications show how death • Mistakes, errors of judgment and poor just ‘patching up’ apparent problem A SAFE SYSTEM and serious injury can be prevented decisions are intrinsic to humans. The areas. globally, including: Towards Zero: road system needs to be designed and • The ‘engineered’ elements of the Ambitious Road Safety Targets and operated to account for this. system—vehicles and roads—can be the Safe System Approach, produced • Humans are fragile. Unprotected, we designed to be compatible with the Road deaths and injuries are by the Organisation for Economic cannot survive impacts that occur at human element, recognising that, a function of the way people Cooperation and Development (OECD), greater than around 30km/h. while crashes might occur, the total behave, the different types the multilateral development banks’ A • People who behave with disregard for system can be designed to minimise of vehicles in use and their Shared Approach to Managing Road the safety of themselves and others harm. speeds, and road design. Safety, and the United Nations’ Global should expect tough policing and Plan for the Decade of Action for Road tough penalties. Despite this complexity, the Countries leading in road safety have Safety 2011-2020. The following principles • Safety can be built into the road put these principles into practice with way in which a genuinely safe broadly underpin the safe system system comprehensively and outstanding results. road system can be created is approach and inform iRAP’s approach: systematically, involving more than well understood After decades of building roads, causes of death and serious injury are well known... Bicyclists are typically killed or Pedestrians are typically killed or Vehicle occupants are typically killed or Motorcyclists are typically killed seriously injured when cycling along seriously injured when walking along or seriously injured in run-off road, head-on or or seriously injured in run-off road, the road and at intersections across the road intersection crashes head-on or intersection crashes As just one example, the Swedish Road Sweden then took even more country to country, the principles are saving 6,000 lives and generating crash- Administration defined a safe road progressive steps towards improving universal. The moral imperative for taking cost savings of £25-£35 billion.5 transport system as one where: the road features to harness the substantial this approach is compelling. So too is driver uses a seat belt, does not exceed synergies that occur when speed and the economic imperative; it is estimated the speed limits, and is sober; the forgiving infrastructure interact in a that a single road death costs as much vehicle has a five-star rating by the Euro compatible way.2 For example, by 2020 as 60-80 times a country’s gross domestic NCAP (European New Car Assessment three quarters of traffic flow with speeds product (GDP) per capita, yet the Programme); and the road has a four- over 80 km/h will be on roads with a economic savings from targeted safety star rating by EuroRAP. Research showed median barrier, where the risk of death upgrades typically exceed the cost of this combination to be a stunning or serious injury in a head-on crash is their construction and maintenance.4 It success: just 2-3% of road deaths significantly reduced.3 was found in the United Kingdom that by occurred when these conditions were investing less than 10% of existing road met, despite them coinciding with 30% of Although the specific approach to budgets, one-star and two-star roads traffic flow.1 creating a safe system might vary from could be eliminated in the next decade, ...as are engineering treatments to prevent unnecessary suffering.6 Bicycle paths like this one Pedestrian footpaths, like this one Energy-absorbing safety barriers, Well-designed roundabouts can This exclusive motorcycle lane in in China reduce the risk that in the Philippines, can reduce like this one in New Zealand, reduce casualty crash risk at Malaysia, the first of its kind in the bicyclists will be struck by fast- the likelihood that people will be significantly reduce the risk of intersections by more than 60% world, ensures that motorcyclists moving cars, trucks or buses, struck by vehicles while walking death or injury. Prior to being and have been shown to be do not need to mix with heavier by physically separating travel by as much as 40-60%. ‘Raised upgraded, this section of road highly cost-effective and often faster-moving traffic. lanes. Well-designed on-road table’ pedestrian crossings help rated two-stars and three-stars The construction of this lane bicycle lanes can reduce to reduce traffic speeds and under KiwiRAP. Now it rates four- resulted in a 39% reduction in bicyclist crashes by 25-40% lower the risk of injury stars. Fatal and serious injury motorcycle crashes crashes decreased by 63% iRAP inspections use specially equipped Countries do not need to inspect every ROAD SAFETY vehicles to collect digital, panoramic road in order to make a large difference; INSPECTIONS images or videos of roads.
Recommended publications
  • TA to Connectivity in the Western Balkans Europeaid/137850/IH/SER
    1 TA to Connectivity in the Western Balkans EuropeAid/137850/IH/SER/MULTI Sub-Project Code: CONNECTA-TRA-CRM-REG-01 Area: Connectivity Transport Reform Measures Preparation of Road Safety Inspection and Audit Plans for core/comprehensive road network in Western Balkans (WB6) and Pilots FINAL REPORT – ROAD SAFETY INSPECTIONS 30 May 2018 2 Issue and revision record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description 1 23/03/2018 Stelios Jesper Mertner Kostas RSI Draft Report Efstathiadis Georgiou (Task. Manager) 2 16/05/2018 Stelios Jesper Mertner Kostas RSI Final Report Efstathiadis Georgiou (Task. Manager) 3 30/05/2018 Stelios Jesper Mertner Kostas RSI Final Report Efstathiadis Georgiou (Task. Manager) Information Class: EU Standard The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald Connecta Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This document is issued for the party, which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party, which commissioned it. 3 Contents 1 SYNOPSIS ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Component 1- Purpose and Objectives .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sensor Project and Consultation on Eurorap Results in Croatia
    SENSoR project and consultation on EuroRAP results in Croatia Olivera Djordjevic, Make Roads Safe Hellas (MRSH) and Marko Ševrović, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences 1 2/40 This presentation • The SENSoR project in South East Europe • EuroRAP methodology – brief introduction • Presentation and consultation on preliminary SENSoR EuroRAP results in Croatia • Potential improvements areas • Discussion 3/40 Make Roads Safe Hellas Make Roads Safe Hellas is a new non-profit organization founded in 2010, Chania-Crete. • Member of the Global Make Roads Safe campaign; • Signatory of European Road Safety Charter; • Member of EuroRAP; • The Lead Partner of SENSOR Project. SENSoR- South East Neighbourhood Safe Routes • Albania • Bosnia & Herzegovina • Bulgaria • Croatia • FYR Macedonia • Greece • Hungary • Moldova • Montenegro • Romania • Serbia • Slovakia • Slovenia 4 • Ukraine 5/40 SENSoR Key Data Project Budget: 1,452,126.50 EUR Project Duration: 24 months Project end: Sept. 2014 Road Survey & Star Rating targets Country Coverage Surveys Greece 3.500km Slovakia 2.500km Slovenia 3.150km Hungary 3.000km Bulgaria 620km Romania 540km Serbia 138km FYROM 548km Bosnia & 352km Herzegovina Montenegro 555km Albania 533km Croatia 481km Total 15.917km 6 7/40 8/40 Communicating our work We send our messages… National and local politicians and stakeholders recognise and support SENSOR as: ….an important project which is being carried out to SAVE LIVES! 9/40 www.sensorproject.eu Follow SENSOR activities at the web interactive map Press Releases Achaia
    [Show full text]
  • 3D Lina Konstantinopoulou
    Lina Konstantinopoulou Secretary General, EuroRAP The road safety potential of big data: Ai-RAP and achieving the UN Road Safety Targets About EuroRAP • International Not For profit Association (AISBL) ‘’A Europe free of high-risk roads’’ EuroRAP Shared Vision in Europe The Human Impact of Road Crashes UN Global Road Safety Performance Targets Supporting RAP Protocols What is our Challenge? • Where are crashes happening now and how severe are they? • How safe are the roads for all road users considering road design, volume and speed? • What is the performance tracking to drive change and measure success. How EuroRAP Can Help RISK MAPS STAR RATING INVESTMENT PLANS PERFORMANCE TRACKING • Colour coded map showing • Based on road inspection • Considers 90 proven road • Regular risk mapping or star the where people are dying data improvement options rating enables performance monitoring and where their crash risk • Simple and objective • A Safer Roads Investment is greatest measure of the level of safety Plan (SRIP) prioritises and • Enables celebration of • Can inform priorities across which is ‘built-in’ to the road costs improvement options success and action to be all pillars of road safety can improve Star Ratings and taken to address persistently • Can be completed in the high risk roads action (management, absence of crash data save lives infrastructure, vehicles, road users and post-crash • Five-star road segments are care) the safest while one-star are the least safe Risk Mapping: harnessing existing crash data 1,487,017km of Risk
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Assessment of Highways England's
    Annual Assessment of Highways England’s Performance April 2020 to March 2021 HC454 Annual Assessment of Highways England’s Performance April 2020 to March 2021 Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 10(8) of the Infrastructure Act 2015 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 July 2021 HC454 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. © Crown copyright 2020 Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at This 25 Cabot Square, London, E14 publication is licensed under 4QZ. the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3ISBN 978-1-5286-2760-3 . Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain CCS0621812220 07/21 permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum This publication is available at orr.gov.uk Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery OfficeAny enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at orr.gov.uk/contact-us Office of Rail and Road | Annual Assessment of Highways England’s Performance: April 2020 to March 2021 Contents Foreword ..............................................................................................................6 Executive summary ..................................................................................................8 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurorap-National-Programme-Policy
    EuroRAP publishes policy recommendations on the implementation of the National Road Safety Action plans Rationale The UN General Assembly has adopted resolution A/74/L.86 “Improving global road safety”, proclaiming the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030, with the ambitious target of halving the number of road traffic deaths and injuries during this period. The Second Decade of Action for Road Safety will continue to reinforce 12 Global Road Safety Performance Targets, including Target 3 and Target 4. The resolution also endorses the Stockholm Declaration, approved during the Third Global Ministerial Conference on Road Safety held in February 2020. In addition, a Ten Step Plan for safer road infrastructure was produced in 2020 by the UNRSC Safer Roads and Mobility Group. This plan provides a clear process for establishing national (including urban) road safety strategies, building capacity, and creating partnerships to support the achievement of the UN Member States Agreed Global Targets 3 and 4 for safer new and existing roads. The Ten Step Plan is a key resource to support the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety (2021-2030). Road safety is also an essential component in the planning and implementation of local and regional Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) as sustainability is not possible without effective road safety measures. In addition, the actions on road safety proposed in the EU’s 3rd Mobility Package in May 2018 are now coming into effect. The safety pillar of this package accelerates effective vehicle safety technologies into regulations; it strengthens the Road Infrastructure Safety Management (RISM) directive; and facilitates connected and automated roads and vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • River Mease Walkover Survey Report Natural England APEM Ref 413482 March 2016 This Project Is Part of the IPENS Programme (LIFE1
    River Mease Walkover Survey Report Natural England APEM Ref 413482 March 2016 This project is part of the IPENS programme (LIFE11NAT/UK/000384IPENS) which is financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community Dr Peter Stone Client: Natural England Address: APEX Court City Link Nottingham NG2 4LA Project reference: 413482 Date of issue: April 2015 ________________________ Project Director: Dr David Fraser Project Manager: Dr Peter Stone Other: Hugh Graham ________________________ APEM Ltd Riverview A17 Embankment Business Park Heaton Mersey Stockport SK4 3GN Tel: 0161 442 8938 Fax: 0161 432 6083 Registered in England No. 2530851 “This is a draft document and should not be cited” Registered in England No. 2530851, Registered Address Riverview A17 Embankment Business Park, Heaton Mersey, Stockport, SK4 3GN Revision and Amendment Register Version Date Section(s) Page(s) Summary of Changes Approved by Number 1 10/2/15 Draft for client review PS 2 27/02/15 5 27 Final following client comment PS Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Aims and Objectives ................................................................................................. 1 2. Methodology ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eurorap Publishes Policy Recommendations on The
    EuroRAP publishes policy recommendations on the implementation of the National Road Safety Action plans Rationale The UN General Assembly has adopted resolution A/74/L.86 “Improving global road safety”, proclaiming the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021-2030, with the ambitious target of halving the number of road traffic deaths and injuries during this period. The Second Decade of Action for Road Safety will continue to reinforce 12 Global Road Safety Performance Targets, including Target 3 and Target 4. The resolution also endorses the Stockholm Declaration, approved during the Third Global Ministerial Conference on Road Safety held in February 2020. In addition, a Ten Step Plan for safer road infrastructure was produced in 2020 by the UNRSC Safer Roads and Mobility Group. This plan provides a clear process for establishing national (including urban) road safety strategies, building capacity, and creating partnerships to support the achievement of the UN Member States Agreed Global Targets 3 and 4 for safer new and existing roads. The Ten Step Plan is a key resource to support the Second Decade of Action for Road Safety (2021-2030). Road safety is also an essential component in the planning and implementation of local and regional Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) as sustainability is not possible without effective road safety measures. In addition, the actions on road safety proposed in the EU’s 3rd Mobility Package in May 2018 are now coming into effect. The safety pillar of this package accelerates effective vehicle safety technologies into regulations; it strengthens the Road Infrastructure Safety Management (RISM) directive; and facilitates connected and automated roads and vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft National Transport Strategy
    European Union Framework Contract Beneficiaries 2013-Lot 2 Development of National Strategy for the Transport Sector Letter of Contract N. IPAOPRD2007-2013-4.2-LOT2-22 Draft National Transport Strategy December 2018 i This project is funded This project is realised by ARS Progetti by the European Union Framework Contract BENEF 2013 Lot 2 Programme Name IPA COMPONENT I OPERATION PROGRAMME FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT (OPRD) Project Name FWC “Development of National Strategy for the Transport Sector “ FWC BENEF 2013 – Lot 2: Transport and Infrastructures Reference No: IPAOPRD2007-2013-4.2-LOT2-22 Contract Number 12-7422/1 Project Duration 10 months Project Commencement Date 20/02/2017 Project End Date 22/12/2017 Name: MoTC CFCD ARS Progetti S.p.A. Role: Beneficiary Contracting Authority Contractor Address: Dame Gruev No. 6 Dame Gruev No. 12 Via Durban, 2 1000 Skopje, Republic 1000 Skopje, Republic 00144 Rome, Italy of Macedonia of Macedonia Telephone: +389 2 3145532 +389 2 3255400 +39 06 57300679 Fax: E-mail: goran.temovski@mtc. Radica.koceva@financ f.sancilio@arsprogetti. gov.mk e.gov.mk com Contact Person: Goran Temovski Radica Koceva Furio Valerio Sancilio Overall Objective To improve the economic efficiency, safety and accessibility of transportation whilst managing the environmental impact of existing and future transport activity and ensuring integration with other sector policies. Purpose To develop actions that address weaknesses in the transport sector at a Regional and National Level. The actions shall cover the period from 2018 until 2030, and shall acknowledge the pipeline of projects and policies that have already been agreed and which it is intended will be delivered during the period of the Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hills, Christopher William Walter (1994) the Examination and Prediction of Opencast Backfill Settlement. Phd Thesis, University of Nottingham
    Hills, Christopher William Walter (1994) The examination and prediction of opencast backfill settlement. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/11501/1/260774.pdf Copyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. · Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. · To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available. · Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not- for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. · Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged. Please see our full end user licence at: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM DEPARTMENT OF MINERAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING H ..; 1it Ci' THE EXAMINATION AND PREDICTION OF OPENCAST BACKFILL SETTLEMENT by Christopher W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Nd Road Safety & Innovation Forum
    2nd International Road Safety & Innovation Forum Leveraging New Technologies & Good Practices From Europe and Beyond Sofia, Bulgaria May 15, 2019 ORGANIZED IN COLLABORATION WITH in association with the 17th EuroRAP General Assembly 1 About the Forum MAY 15, 2019 08:30-09:00 Registrations & Welcome Coffee 09:00-10:30 Opening Session Keynote address: John Dawson, Founding Chairman, EuroRAP Getting to Vision Zero in Bulgaria • Minister of Regional Development and Public Works • Krasimir Tsipov, Deputy Minister of Interior • Minister of Transport, Information Technology and Communication A Decade of Action for Road Safety: What have we learned? • Ferry Smith, Chairman, EuroRAP • Michael G. Dreznes, Executive Vice President, IRF • Nikolay Ivanov, President, BBARS 10:30-11:00 Refreshment break and High Level Visit of the Innovation Forum 11:00-12:30 Innovations in policies & diagnoses Introduced and moderated by Malina Krumova, State Agency for Road Safety • Georgi Terziiski, Chairman of the Board, Road Infrastructure Agency • Philipp Troppman, European Commission Infrastructure Directive 2008/96/EC opportunities after rethink and revision, • Rossitsa Spassova, member, Bulgarian Branch Association “Road Safety” Adoption and implementation of 2008/96/EC in Bulgaria • Ian Koeppel, ESRI Transport Europe Mainstreaming road safety with GIS • Richard Lax, Kapsch TraffiCom New directions for data-driven road safety 12:30-13:30 Lunch Break & Innovation Forum 13:30-15:00 Innovative Treatments and Investment Panel Introduced and moderated by Mike Dreznes,
    [Show full text]
  • Road Safety and Health)
    Bliss Breen Implementing the Recommendations of World Report on Road Traffi World Public Disclosure Authorized Implementing the Recommendations of the World Report on Road Traffi c Injury Prevention Implementing the Recommendations of the World Report on Road Traffi c Injury Prevention Country Guidelines for the Conduct of Road Safety Management Capacity Reviews and the Specifi cation of Lead Agency Reforms, Investment Strategies Country Guidelines for the Conduct of Road Safety and Safe System Projects c Injury Prevention Management Capacity Reviews and the Specifi cation he World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank jointly issued the World TReport on Road Traffi c Injury Prevention on World Health Day 2004, dedicated by of Lead Agency Reforms, Investment Strategies Public Disclosure Authorized the WHO to the improvement of global road safety. The report’s publication signaled a growing concern in the global community about the scale of the health losses associated and Safe System Projects with escalating motorization and a recognition that urgent measures had to be taken to sustainably reduce their economic and social costs. Implementing the report’s recom- mendations has become a priority mandated in successive UN General Assembly Resolutions and these guidelines have been prepared to assist this task. Reforms,Investment Strategies and Safe System Projects Capacity Reviews and the Specifi Country Guidelines for the Conduct of Road Safety Management Road safety management systems have evolved in high-income countries over the last fi fty years and the challenge for all countries will be to benefi t from the lessons learned, to avoid perpetuating the unnecessary and unacceptably high level of deaths and injuries experienced on the world’s roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Whatton & Diseworth Flood Risk Mitigation & Resilience Study
    LONG WHATTON & DISEWORTH FLOOD RISK MITIGATION & RESILIENCE STUDY Final Model Report AUGUST 2020 CONTACTS SIMON AINLEY Project Manager dd +01752 689006 Arcadis. e [email protected] 34 York Way London N1 9AB Copyright © 2018 Arcadis. All rights reserved. arcadis.com VERSION CONTROL Version Date Author Checker Approver Changes 01 09/06/2020 S Ainley J Sourbutts N McClung First Issue 02 16/07/2020 S Ainley J Sourbutts N McClung Second Issue 03 25/08/2020 S Ainley J Sourbutts N McClung Second Issue This report dated 25 August 2020 has been prepared for Leicestershire County Council (the “Client”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment (the “Appointment”) between the Client and Arcadis UK (“Arcadis”) for the purposes specified in the Appointment. For avoidance of doubt, no other person(s) may use or rely upon this report or its contents, and Arcadis accepts no responsibility for any such use or reliance thereon by any other third party. ii CONTENTS VERSION CONTROL .......................................................................................................... II 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1 2 PROJECT SCOPE & CONTEXT ............................................................................... 2 2.1 Previous Investigations ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Scope of this Project ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]