DOCSLIB.ORG

Dickson Pilot Project Set to Launch April 28 Join Us at Nashville Earth Day Festival April 19 Hamilton Springs Awarded $1.6 Mill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dickson Pilot Project Set to Launch April 28 Join Us at Nashville Earth Day Festival April 19 Hamilton Springs Awarded $1.6 Mill VOLUME 8, ISSUE 1 Spring 2014 Dickson pilot project set to launch April 28 Hamilton Springs Plans are being made to offer a Bob Rial said. “This initiative will dem- awarded $1.6 million two-week pilot project for express bus onstrate not only that there is a great service from the City of Dickson to need for transit in our area, but it will grant for commuter downtown Nashville. show our residents how easy and ben- rail station Free service will be available to the eficial it is to use public transportation.” first 56 passengers each weekday from The Music City Star will soon April 28-May 9 and will be operated by be adding another rail stop to Gray Line of Tennessee for the RTA. its route. The RTA was recently This pilot project is being offered to awarded a $1.6 million federal grant by the Nashville Metro- gauge the interest of commuters in the politan Planning Organization Dickson area. (MPO) to fund the completion The morning bus will depart from of Hamilton Springs Station lo- the City of Dickson at 6:40 a.m. and ar- cated in Middle Tennessee’s rive at Music City Central in downtown first transit-oriented develop- Nashville at 7:40 a.m. The afternoon ment (TOD). bus will depart from Music City Central The Hamilton Springs Sta- Bay 7 at 4:38 p.m. and arrive in Dickson tion will be the Music City Star’s at 5:40 p.m. A Park & Ride lot will be lo- seventh regional rail station. cated at the Walmart on Beasley Drive Currently in the design phase, in Dickson. construction of the station is “Accessible public transportation is expected to begin in the spring of 2015. important to our community,” Dickson Lebanon is among the highest County Mayor and RTA Board Member in population growth in Tennes- see, with a 33 percent popula- Join us at Nashville Earth Day Festival April 19 tion increase since 1990. The addition of the train station will This year’s Earth Day Festival will be held at Centennial Park on Saturday, create a new point of access to April 19 from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Members of the Nashville MTA and RTA staff will the Music City Star and increase be present to promote the many benefits of public transportation in the Middle ridership significantly. Tennessee region. The Nashville MTA also will have a hybrid bus on display Phase one of the 396-unit luxury Hamilton Springs apart- for attendees to explore. ment community opened last The free, family-friendly festival will feature exhibits and activities to help fall. Other residential housing educate Nashvillians about protecting our environment. For more information and businesses centered by the regarding the event, please visit www.nashvilleearthday.org. train station are planned. A key feature of TODs is the emphasis on transit modes other than the automobile. “The RTA board and I are pleased to partner with Jack Bell Builders and the MPO on our region’s first transit- oriented development,” said RTA General Manager Lora Baulsir. “We are looking forward to opening the new station.” CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 Music City Star financially secure Commuter rail not effected by short-line controversy The current funding freeze affect- equity fund to the short-line railroads ing Tennessee’s short-line railroads were suspended by TDOT pending has led to speculation there will be the outcome of appeals. a disruption in the Music City Star’s The situation is being monitored, service. The RTA is confident that and there are a number of options the operation of the Music City Star available to address this revenue will continue unimpeded since it is not problem for the state’s short line rail- funded by this revenue source and is roads. To begin, the state is appeal- not a short-line; it is a commuter train. ing the decision and is not going to The particular track utilized by the allow this vital network of rail lines Music City Star is actually owned by to go away, permanently injuring the Nashville & Eastern Railroad Author- economic well-being of many Ten- RTA GM Lora Baulsir and former CEO Paul J. Ballard ity (NERA). nessee counties. The jobs and busi- unveil a plaque dedicated to Sheila Watkins Varga at the Mt. Juliet train station In mid-October 2013, a federal ness losses would be immediately felt judge in Nashville stopped the state by the state’s economy. And finally, from collecting the tax that supplied there will be other opportunities to RTA honors Sheila Varga funding for rail improvements for the bring revenue sources to the table to short-line railroads in Tennessee. The prevent the Music City Star from be- On July 30, 2013, Middle Tennes- money for these improvements comes ing harmed. see lost one of its most admired Music from the state’s Short Line Equity Legislation is pending in the Gener- City Star riders and supporters – Sheila Fund, which receives its money from al Assembly that will change the way Watkins Varga. In recognition of her a seven percent tax the state charges large railroads are taxed. Since TDOT many achievements – participating in on diesel fuel for railroad locomotives. has about $40 million in the fund, the the Transit Alliance of Middle Tennes- Lawsuits were filed by the large rail- RTA is optimistic that NERA and the see’s inaugural Transit Citizen Lead- road companies claiming the tax is other short-line rail authorities will ership Academy, as well as being the discriminatory. Payments out of the soon begin receiving the funds again. president of the Regional Commuters Association – the RTA placed a com- NEWS & NOTES memorative plaque at her daily boarding station in Mt. Juliet. Search for new CEO A dedication ceremony to unveil The Nashville MTA Board is conducting a national search to replace the plaque was held on March 25. former MTA/RTA CEO Paul J. Ballard, who left Nashville to become Family members and friends gathered president and CEO of the Fort Worth Transportation Authority. A few as former RTA CEO Paul J. Ballard, of Ballard’s many RTA accomplishments include directing the start-up RTA Communications Director Patri- of the Music City Star, expanding regional bus service, and consis- cia Harris-Morehead, and fellow Music tently increasing ridership for both MTA and RTA. City Star riders Clyde Hicks and Johna Starcher provided remarks about Shei- RTA rebranding la’s love of the train and public transit. The RTA Marketing Committee has been discussing the need to re-ex- When passing by the plaque, those amine the RTA’s marketing brands of services. Members of the RTA who admired or were influenced by Board are excited to begin this process with a series of meetings be- Sheila’s dedication to improving public ginning this month to examine the overall brand position. As part of transit in the region, as well as those this rebranding exercise, you may see more of the RTA staff on buses who did not know her, are invited to conducting surveys in order to gather more information for future pause for a moment of silence to honor marketing needs. this “Special Friend of the Music City Star” who was among the original group Track rehab of riders to board the train in September The Music City Star is currently in the middle of the first phase of track 2006. rehab; between three and four thousand wooden ties have been re- placed thus far. Additional tie curves, spikes, ballasts, culverts and welding of the rail also are needed to increase speed allowances and Follow us on twitter: keep safety our top priority. Plans for a new rail passing siding con- @MiddleTN_RTA struction also are underway to enable service expansion. Music City Star Tracks is a publication of the Regional Transportation Authority of Middle Tennessee. For more infor- mation about our services, visit our website at RTArelaxandride.com or call Customer Care at (615) 862-5950..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Commuter Rail System Study
    TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Commuter Rail System Study Transit Committee March 11, 2010 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Study Purpose Study Requested by MAG Regional Council in 2008 Commuter Rail Study Funding in 2004 RTP Study Feasibility of Commuter Rail Service in MAG Region Ridership Forecasting and Cost Effectiveness Capital and Operating Cost Estimates Vehicle Technology Recommendation Implementation Requirements Copyright © 2009 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Peer Regions ~ Commuter Rail Systems WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? Peak Period, Peak Direction Service. Traditionally caries less daily riders than light rail, but for longer distances. Similar market and characteristics with Bus Rapid Transit / Express. SOUNDER-Seattle CALTRAIN-San Francisco ALTAMONT COMMUTER EXPRESS – San Jose Can share ROW and track with freight railroads and can operate concurrently (does not require exclusive right-of-way) . Typically longer station spacing (every 3-7 miles on average) than light rail (1-2 miles) with emphasis on park-and-rides and traditional city CBDs. Locomotive technology (diesel or clean/green hybrid Genset). Passenger coaches (push-pull). Engines and cars meets federally mandated structural requirements for rolling stock crash resistance Larger, heavier profile than light rail vehicles. METROLINK – Los Angeles COASTER – San Diego FRONT RUNNER – Salt Lake City-Ogden Higher max.speed (79mph), slower acceleration and deceleration than light rail. Average speed approx 44mph. Lower capital cost per mile ($10-$20M) due to existing right of way use / reuse. Light
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of U.S. Commuter Rail
    AN OVERVIEW OF U.S. COMMUTER RAIL Timothy J. Brock, MA Reginald R. Souleyrette, PhD, PE KTC-13-18/UTCNURAIL1-12-1F This research was sponsored by: The NuRail Center National University Transportation Center and The Kentucky Transportation Center University of Kentucky Cover Photo: Tri-Rail System in Miami, Florida By: Timothy J. Brock Date: April, 2011 Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Ted Grossardt and Dr. Len O’Connell for their comments on earlier drafts. They would also like to thank the participants in the Cities, Transportation and Sustainability session at the Association of American Geographers annual meeting for the thoughtful discussion and comments on this research. Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Kentucky Transportation Center or of the NuRail Center. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. ii AN OVERVIEW OF U.S. COMMUTER RAIL Timothy J. Brock, M.A. Research Associate Kentucky Transportation Center University of Kentucky and Reginald R. Souleyrette, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Transportation Engineering and Commonwealth Chair College of Engineering University of Kentucky FINAL REPORT May 2nd, 2013 © 2013 University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center Information may not be used, reproduced, or republished without our written consent. iii 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No KTC-13-18/UTCNURAIL1-12-1F 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date May 2013 AN OVERVIEW OF U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Corridor Regional Transportation Authority of Middle Tennessee Transit Study SUMMARY of FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS | October 2017
    Northwest Corridor Regional Transportation Authority of Middle Tennessee Transit Study SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | October 2017 For a copy of the appendices of the Northwest Corridor Transit Study report, please contact Felix Castrodad at 615-862-5626 or [email protected]. Northwest Corridor Transit Study | FINAL REPORT | 10.2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) of Middle Tennessee would RTA BOARD TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION like to thank the following for their contributions to the development Chair: Mayor Kim McMillan, City of Clarksville Commissioner John Schroer of the Northwest Corridor Transit Study: Vice Chair: Mayor Randall Hutto, Wilson County Secretary: Paula Mansfield, Rutherford County GOVERNOR’S APPOINTEES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Cheatham County Cheatham County - Daryl Phillips Mayor Kim McMillan, City of Clarksville Ashland City - Mayor Rick Johnson Davidson County - Ed Cole Mayor Rick Johnson, City of Ashland City Cheatham County - Mayor David McCullough Dickson County - Scott England Mayor Megan Barry, Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County Montgomery County - Mike Evans Davidson County Mayor Billy Paul Carneal, City of Springfield Rutherford County - Paula Mansfield Belle Meade - Mayor James Hunt Mayor Jim Durrett, Montgomery County Sumner County - Lee Zoller Davidson County/Metro Nashville - Mayor Megan Barry Mayor David McCullough, Cheatham County Williamson County - Kelly Dannenfelser Goodlettsville - Mayor John Coombs Mayor Howard Bradley, Robertson County
    [Show full text]
  • Ada Final Rule: Rail System Accessibility July 2011
    Regulatory Impact Assessment and Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis ADA FINAL RULE: RAIL SYSTEM ACCESSIBILITY JULY 2011 Prepared by: Economic Analysis Division John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Research and Innovative Technology Administration Department of Transportation Introduction Overview This document evaluates the benefits, costs, and other impacts of a DOT rulemaking related to the accessibility of commuter rail transportation and intercity passenger rail service. In keeping with Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and DOT policy, the analysis has been prepared with the goal of “assessing the costs and benefits of regulatory alternatives,” allowing policymakers to make regulatory decisions in light of the “best reasonably obtainable scientific, technical, economic, and other information” (E.O. 12866). Benefits and costs of the rule are presented in the sections below. Based on the information gathered for this analysis, the overall benefits and costs of the rule are relatively modest, since many aspects of rail service accessibility are already required by existing regulations. Compliance costs are estimated at about $1.8 million in construction costs, plus some minor increases in operational costs for certain commuter rail systems that use mini-high platforms. Benefits of the rule are mainly in the form of serving passengers with disabilities in a more integrated setting. General Benefit-Cost Principles The basic framework for regulatory evaluation is an examination of the future world with the regulation in place, versus a baseline of the future world in the absence of the regulation. The analysis ordinarily takes a “societal” perspective in which all benefits and costs are included regardless of to whom they accrue.
    [Show full text]
  • Stateline Area Transportation Study (SLATS) Rail Study
    SLATS Passenger Rail Study Stateline Area Transportation Study (SLATS) February 22, 2021 History 2002 Metra UP Northwest Line Harvard, IL / Clinton, WI Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Study 2008 The Interurban Line (1902) South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study (SCWCTS) 2020 IDOT restoring intercity passenger rail service between Rockford and Chicago 2021 SLATS Rail Study (incorporate into 2045 LRTP) Streetcar on East Grand Avenue (1906) SOURCE: https://www.beloittransit.com/history/ 2 Background Harvard, IL – Metra Station SOURCE: Google Maps Street view, June 2019. Study Purpose Potential Benefits ▪ Evaluate the feasibility of extending ▪ Improve workforce mobility passenger/intercity and/or commuter rail to ▪ Support economic development the Stateline Area ▪ Expand alternative travel options ▪ Explore options that extend rail service ▪ Reduce roadway congestion through the Stateline Area ▪ Encourage more compact development patterns ▪ Evaluate potential ridership 3 “Super Region” Madison ▪ SLATS ▪ Janesville Area Metropolitan Janesville Planning Organization ▪ Region 1 Planning Council SLATS (Rockford) Harvard, IL ▪ Greater Madison MPO Rockford CMAP ▪ Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) 4 Universe of Rail Corridors ▪ Builds on 2008 South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study (SCWCTS) o 26 rail corridor links Harvard (Metra Station) o Screened to five alignments Beloit • Madison-Evansville-Janesville • Madison-Milton-Janesville • Janesville-Beloit-Rockford • Janesville-Harvard • Beloit-Clinton
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule and Cost Feasibility of Major Capital Projects
    APPENDIX A Wake County Transit Plan Update Schedule and Cost Feasibility of Major Capital Projects Completed February 7, 2020 Table of Contents 1 Overview ....................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Key Findings ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Commuter Rail ............................................................................................................... 3 Project Description .................................................................................................................. 3 Estimated Schedule and Cost .................................................................................................. 3 Current Project Assumptions ................................................................................................... 4 Peer Review ............................................................................................................................. 6 Summary Findings.................................................................................................................... 9 3 Bus Rapid Transit .......................................................................................................... 11 Project Description ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUTER RAIL Commuter Rail Is Passenger Rail Service That Is Designed to Transport Large Volumes of Passengers Over Long Distances in a Fast and Comfortable Manner
    TRANSIT STRATEGIES COMMUTER RAIL Commuter rail is passenger rail service that is designed to transport large volumes of passengers over long distances in a fast and comfortable manner. The primary market for commuter rail service is usually commuters to and from city centers. However, many commuter rail lines also provide regional and all day service. The major benefits of commuter rail service are: è Comfortable and fast service, often faster than driving è Easy to understand and use è Efficient way to transport large volumes of people MINNEAPOLIS NORTHSTAR NASHVILLE MUSIC CITY STAR Common elements of commuter rail service include: § Vehicles: Most American commuter rail trains consist of a locomotive and multiple passenger cars, but some consist of multiple self-propelled cars. Most American commuter rail systems are diesel-powers, but a few are electric-powered. § Length: Most commuter rail lines are designed to serve long distance travel, and lines that range from 20 to 50 miles are most common. § Station Spacing: To provide competitive travel times, stations are spaced widely apart, typically every three to five miles, and often longer. § Access and Station Facilities: Most commuter rail stations rely heavily on park and ride access, and thus most include parking, and many facilities can be very large. Other station facilities include platforms, and depending upon boarding volumes, either simple shelters or enclosed waiting areas. They also commonly include other elements such as real-time passenger information, ticket vending, and bicycle parking. § Capacity: Commuter rail coaches can be either single or double level. Single level coaches can seat up to 125 passengers and bi-levels coaches can seat up to 185 passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Fare Collection Options for Commuter Railroads
    ELECTRONIC FARE COLLECTION OPTIONS FOR COMMUTER RAILROADS FINAL REPORT September 2009 Report No. FTA-MA-26-7109.2009.01 This page intentionally left blank. ii ELECTRONIC FARE COLLECTION OPTIONS FOR COMMUTER RAILROADS September 2009 Prepared by: Lydia Rainville, Victoria Hsu, Sean Peirce U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Economic and Industry Analysis Division Cambridge, MA 02142 FINAL REPORT Report Number: FTA-MA-26-7109-2009.01 Sponsored by: Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Available Online [http://www.fta.dot.gov/research] iii This page intentionally left blank. 1.1.1.1.1.1 Form Approved Report Documentation Page OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED Final Report September 2009 September 2008-September 2009 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Electronic Fare Collection Options for Commuter Railroads MA-26-7109 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuter Rail Transit and Economic Development Arthur C. Nelson
    Commuter Rail Transit and Economic Development Arthur C. Nelson Professor of Planning and Real Estate Development College of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture 1040 N. Olive Road University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85719 E: [email protected] V: 520.621.4004 Acknowledgement and Disclaimer Support for this article came from the National Institute of Transportation and Communities. Co- sponsors included the Utah Transit Authority, Portland Metro, TriMet, Lane County Transit, City of Ogden, Utah, City of Provo, Utah, Transportation for America (a subsidiary of Smart Growth America), City of Tucson, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada, and Mid America Regional Council. The contents of this article reflect the views of the authors, who are solely responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the material and information presented herein. November 2017 1 Commuter Rail Transit and Economic Development Abstract Commuter rail transit (CRT) is a form of rail passenger service connecting suburbs and more distant areas to downtowns and other major activity centers. Between 1834 and 1973, only three public CRT systems were built in the U.S., serving New York, Chicago, and later Boston. But 2016, there were 29 public CRT systems. Modern CRT systems aim to expand economic development in metropolitan areas. But do they? This article evaluates the economic development performance of five modern CRT systems built in the South and West: “Tri Rail” connecting the metropolitan areas of Miami and West Palm Beach, Florida; “Rail Runner “connecting the metropolitan areas of Albuquerque and Santa Fe, New Mexico; “FrontRunner” connecting the metropolitan areas of Ogden and Salt Lake City, Utah; “Coaster” serving metropolitan San Diego; and “Sounder” connecting the metropolitan areas of Tacoma and Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Age Return of Transit Article 10-13-20
    Transit, Six Months After COVID-19: A Progress Report Written by David Peter Alan, Contributing Editor Transit is fighting its way back, after devastating decreases in ridership and revenue last spring, which necessitated severe service reductions on many lines and throughout many systems. Today, many of those systems are increasing service, both because many of the remaining riders need it, and in the hope that riders from the pre-COVID era will come back. Offices are re-opening slowly and carefully in some transit-rich cities, and many venues that historically attracted tourists (even if only for a day trip) are still shut down. Wherever it is located, transit must fight a protracted battle to remain relevant and regain some of the ground it captured during the past several decades, and then lost during the past several months. In this report, we will look at how transit providers in the US and Canada are doing, especially with respect to the amount of service they are offering. Some providers are back to offering the level of service that they offered before the virus hit. Others still offer reduced service, while some lines are still shut down completely. How is your local transit provider doing these days? Read on and find out. The Northeast: Where there is still plenty of transit, but not plenty of money to run it The Northeast is the home of three of the nation’s legacy rail systems (Boston, the New York area, and Philadelphia), a number of newer rail lines and systems, and Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor (NEC) to connect most of them.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Interim Report, Revised
    TCRP PROJECT NO. G-14 CONTRACTING COMMUTER RAIL SERVICES Interim Report, Revised Prepared for: Transit Cooperative Research Program Transportation Research Board National Research Council Transportation Research Board NAS-NRC LIMITED USE DOCUMENT This working paper, not released for publication, is furnished only to members of, or participants in the work of, the Transit Cooperative Research Program. It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included therein must be approved by the TCRP. April 2016 Texas A&M Transportation Institute In association with: ESH Consult James Stoetzel Shelly Brown Associates, LLC [Blank Page] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page _Toc449105579 Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................1 Report Objective ......................................................................................................................... 1 Interim Report Organization ....................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2: Overview .....................................................................................................................3 Identification of Commuter Rail Systems ................................................................................... 3 History of Commuter Rail in North America ............................................................................. 5 Scale of Operations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Network Integration Study
    FINAL Monterey Bay Area Network Integration Study July 29, 2021 FINAL Monterey Bay Area Network Integration Study July 29, 2021 This page intentionally left blank. 2 FINAL Monterey Bay Area Network Integration Study July 29, 2021 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ..................................................................... 11 1.1 Initial Service ....................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Phased Service .................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.3 Vision Service ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 1.4 Next Steps ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 2. Introduction / Role of Rail in the Region.................................. 22 2.1 Study Purpose..................................................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Study Overview .................................................................................................................................................. 24 3. Public Outreach ............................................................................ 25 3.1
    [Show full text]