DOCSLIB.ORG

The Campus of the Future Will Reflect the Best Building on the Campus Framework, the 3D Model 3 the Framework for Future Features of the Campus Today

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Campus of the Future Will Reflect the Best Building on the Campus Framework, the 3D Model 3 the Framework for Future Features of the Campus Today Sections 3 and 4 together encompass the overall plan for the uOttawa campus. This section describes the foundational layers of the Campus Master Plan and the major physical “moves” 3 intended to define campus development for the next 20 or more years. The layers include the planned transportation network, open space system, land use pattern and strategic development sites. The resulting framework will ensure future development and other initiatives contribute to a coherent, unified and interconnected campus structure. The big moves provide general direction regarding the priority locations for new or renewed buildings and open spaces. By promoting a green, compact, pedestrian-friendly and energy-efficient campus, both the framework and big moves support a more sustainable campus. The framework and big moves focus on the Downtown/Sandy Hill and Lees Station areas of the campus. The structure for future development in the Alta Vista precincts is described in Section 4. Big Moves Framework & 3.1 Campus Framework The campus of the future will reflect the best Building on the campus framework, the 3D model 3 The framework for future features of the campus today. It will be compact, images in the Master Plan conceptually illustrate campus development consists complete and sustainable. Spaces will be how the campus of the future might develop of multiple layers, as illustrated renewed and the campus will become more over the next 50 years. The vision is based on the on the opposite page and further walkable and integrated to ensure a high-quality following seven big physical moves, which are campus image and experience. Embedded described beginning on page 52: described in the pages that within the nation’s capital and Canada’s fourth follow. Starting at the bottom, most populous city and along the Rideau 1 Renew the Core the first layer looks at which of Canal–a National Historic Site and UNESCO 2 Green the campus the existing buildings on the World Heritage Site–the campus will continue 3 Transform King Edward CAMPUS FRAMEWORK campus should be reconsidered to be defined by its remarkable setting. It will be in the fullness of time. With a place that past, present and future members 4 Develop the River Precinct of the university community will recognize, those buildings removed, a new 5 Start development around Lees Station remember and cherish. road and pedestrian structure 6 Develop complete communities can be implemented, creating new blocks. With this new block 7 Foster new partnerships structure, additional green spaces can be incorporated and the existing public realm enhanced. Finally, several new buildings can be developed on the new blocks fronting onto the new public spaces. Figure 3-1 Framework 40 UOTTAWA CAMPUS MASTER PLAN LAURIER OSGOODE Development Sites SOMERSET New development blocks provide KING EDWARD substantial opportunities for TEMPLETON development over the next 50+ years. CHAPEL MANN LEES LAURIER OSGOODE Land Use KING EDWARD To optimize land based on its location SOMERSET and history, specific uses will be LEES encouraged in certain areas on campus. TEMPLETON CHAPEL MANN LEES Green Armature New open spaces and public realm RIDEAU CANAL/ CANAL RIDEAU enhancements will link and beautify all LEES parts of the campus. LAURIER WALLER OSGOODE KING EDWARD Mobility Existing Pedestrian/Cyclist Bridge Potential Pedestrian/Cyclist Bridge RIDEAU RIVER A new pedestrian priority inner core ExistingSOMERSET Pedestrian/Cyclist and Transit Bridge campus will improve circulation and the TEMPLETON pedestrian experience. KING EDWARD CHAPEL MANN LEES LAURIER OSGOODE SOMERSET Buildings to be Reconsidered LEES Certain buildings on campus will be TEMPLETON demolished over time to accommodate new facilities and connections. CHAPEL MANN LEES LEES CHAPTER 3 Framework and Big Moves 41 Brooks Residence occupies a prime Fauteux should development site. be considered for replacement in the 3 long term. CUMBERLAND LAURIER OSGOODE CAMPUS FRAMEWORK SOMERSET TEMPLETON Existing Buildings KING EDWARD The buildings in pink are deficient for their intended function or represent an underutilization of their site. Incrementally replacing them will allow for significant growth in academic space in the core and the establishment of a The University Centre is out of more interconnected network of date and undersized for the pedestrian connections. current student population. For more information on sites for renewal or redevelopment, see Section 4.1 (p. 70). 42 UOTTAWA CAMPUS MASTER PLAN Existing Pedestrian Priority Route Primary Community Hub University of Ottawa Proposed Pedestrian Priority Route Academic/Administration Existing Housing Surrounding Neighbourhoods Secondary Community Hub Aliated Institution Existing Sidewalk Academic-Mixed use Potential Housing Sites Existing Food Service University of Ottawa Property LRT Line/Station General Mixed use Proposed Sidewalk University of Ottawa Property University of Ottawa Property-Under Option Proposed Food Service Neighbourhood Residential LRT Downtown Tunnel/Station Pathway Athletic/Recreational -Mixed use uOttawa Leased/Partnership Property Existing/Proposed Food Service Future LRT Existing Multi-Use Pathway Academic Mixed-Use/Athletics and Recreation Future LRT Line/Station At-Grade Active Frontage Open Space Existing BRT Line/Stop Future Multi-Use Pathway Somerset Pedestrian/Cycling Corridor Precinct Boundary Existing Sports Complex/Field Future BRT Line/Stop Future Pedestrian Bridge Existing Utility Tunnels uOttawa Shuttle Bus Academic Existing Pedestrian Bridge University of Ottawa Car Free Area Teaching and research facilities; administrative uses; Proposed New Utility Tunnels ancillary student residences and services O-Train Existing Pedestrian/Bike Tunnel Existing uOttawa Open Space Academic Mixed-Use Existing Utility Tunnels Teaching and research facilities; administrative uses; Downtown Ottawa Future Pedestrian Tunnel Proposed uOttawa Open Space student residences; ancillary services and retail General Mixed-Use Potential Student Housing Site Major Open Space Existing Trac Light Sport Complex/Field General apartment residential; general oce; administrative uses; teaching and research facilities; Core Precinct-Student Housing Strategy student residences; ancillary services and retail uOttawa Existing Building Proposed Trac Light One Way Street-Existing Neighbourhood Residential Existing Student Housing Building General apartment residential; detached, semi- ; Potential Development Site Two Way Street-Existing detached or row houses; student residences Student Housing Building Building for Renewal One Way Street (Proposed) Athletics and Recreation for Demolition Athletic and recreation facilities; student residences; uOttawa Existing Building ancillary teaching and research facilities; services and retail Building for Demolition Two Way Street (Proposed) Academic Mixed-Use/Athletics and Recreation Precinct Boundary Building for Renewal Teaching and research facilities; athletic and recreation facilities; Neighbourhood Renewal administrative uses; student residences; ancillary services Proposed Street Redesign with Cycling and Transit Building for Demolition Facilities (Refer to Arts Court Rideau Public Realm Plan Options - Major Open Space Housing Co-op Functional Design to be Conrmed) Key Site to be Considered for Partnership Precinct Boundary Neighbourhood Renewal Private Driveway (Proposed) Potential Site to be Considered for Partnership City of Ottawa Cycling Facilities Existing Trac Light Primary Existing Vehicle Route Existing Bike Lanes NCC Property (Under Long Term Lease by the City) Fit Proposed Trac Light Proposed Vehicle Route Proposed Bike Lanes Future uOttawa Building(Conceptual) Decient Existing Shared Pedestrian Priority Street or other Dedicated Bike Facilities MacDonald Hall is no longer Proposed Bike Lane Existing uOttawa Building meetingUnt faculty needs. Existing Multi-Use Pathway Proposed Shared Pedestrian Priority Street Existing Multi-Use Pathway Future LRT Line/Station Co-op Future Multi-Use Pathway Existing Pedestrian Only Route Future Multi-Use Pathway uOttawa Shuttle Bus Existing Building Future Bike/Pedestrian Bridge Existing uOttawa Building Existing Pedestrian Only Route OC Transpo Bus Routes Primary Community Hub Existing Bike/Pedestrian Bridge Future uOttawa Building Footprint (Conceptual) Proposed Pedestrian Only Route TEMPLETON STO Bus Route 200/Terminal Secondary Community Hub Existing Pedestrian/Bike Tunnel Existing street which may require realignment Existing/Proposed uOttawa Open Space STO Bus Route 300 Existing Sports Field * Future Pedestrian/Bike Tunnel (Not Owned by uOttawa)Existing buildings Group 1: Heritage Future uOttawa Building (Conceptual) CHAPEL at 200 Lees uOttawa Cycling Facilities MANN Group 2: Heritage Interest Existing uOttawa Building Existing Bike Lanes Group 3: Contributing Compatible Student Housing University of Proposed Bike Lanes Ottawa Property or other Dedicated Bike Facilities Group 4: Of No Heritage Interest Academic uOttawa Property ROBINSON Aliated Institution Proposed Multi-Use Pathway Sandy Hill Heritage Conservation District Open Space uOttawa Property (Under Option) Arterial Mainstreet Existing Shared Bike Route Food Services uOttawa Leased/Partnership Property (Within Pedestrian Priority Area) Sandy Hill West Heritage Conservation District Traditional Mainstreet LEESGeneral Campus Boundary Proposed Shared Bike Route (Includes Public ROW) (Within Pedestrian Priority Area) Heritage Overlay Central Area uOttawa Existing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2. Faqs__Transit Service During Confed Line
    Transit Service During Confederation Line Construction – Updates for 2016 REPORT TRANSIT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT FAQs REPORT Transit Service During Confederation Line Construction – Updates for 2016 TITLE DIVISION: Customer Systems and Planning BRANCH Service Planning REPORT Pat Scrimgeour, Assistant General Manager, Customer Date: January 26, 2016 AUTHOR Systems and Planning SCHEDULED DATES FOR REPORT GM’s REVIEW OF REPORT TRANSIT COMMISSION COUNCIL January 19, 2016 February 17, 2016 N/A Q1. How long will the Confederation Line construction service adjustments last for? What are the next phases for service adjustments? A1. The O-Train Confederation Line is scheduled to open in 2018. Service adjustments will take place in sequential phases as sections of the Transitway undergo construction work. Each section of Transitway that closes for conversion to light rail will never reopen for bus operations. The remaining Transitway closures are: • April 2016 – Laurier Station to Lees Station; and • June 2016 – Tunney's Pasture Station to Merton Street. Timelines will be updated as information becomes available. Service adjustment plans will be implemented as these closures take effect. Stations will remain open during the construction period, with the exceptions of Cyrville Station, which was closed in June 2015, and Campus Station, which will close in April 2016. Q2. What are the main highlights of upcoming transit service adjustments during Confederation Line Construction? A2. The following are the main highlights of upcoming transit service adjustments during O- Train Confederation Line Construction: • On April 24, 2016, the Transitway will close between Laurier Station and Lees Station. Most transit service along this section of the Transitway will be relocated to Nicholas Street and Highway 417, using the bus-only lanes that have been built for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa Transportation Report.Pdf
    OTTAWA THE IMPACT OF TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON HOUSING VALUES IN THE OTTAWA REGION Don R Campbell, Senior Analyst Melanie Reuter, Director of Research Allyssa Epp, Research Analyst WWW.REINCANADA.COM AUTHORS Don R. Campbell, Senior Analyst, REIN Ltd Melanie Reuter, Director of Research, REIN Ltd Allyssa Fischer, Research Analyst, REIN Ltd © The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd. 6 – 27250 58 Cr Langley, BC V4W 3W7 Tel (604) 856-2825 Fax (604) 856-0091 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Page: www.reincanada.com Important Disclaimer: This Report, or any seminars or updates given in relation thereto, is sold, or otherwise provided, on the understanding that the authors – Don R. Campbell, Melanie Reuter, Allyssa Fischer, and The Real Estate Investment Network Ltd and their instructors, are not responsible for any results or results of any actions taken in reliance upon any information contained in this report, or conveyed by way of the said seminars, nor for any errors contained therein or presented thereat or omissions in relation thereto. It is further understood that the said authors and instructors do not purport to render legal, accounting, tax, investment, financial planning or other professional advice. The said authors and instructors hereby disclaim all and any liability to any person, whether a purchaser of this Report, a student of the said seminars, or otherwise, arising in respect of this Report, or the said seminars, and of the consequences of anything done or purported to be done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or part, upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Report or the said seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Plan.Pdf
    Blair Station 9-34 Maintenance and Storage Facility Track redundancy within the facility will be provided to ensure The proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility is an integral the ability to move LRVs under vehicle or system failure part of the project, as it will: conditions. • House and service all of the trains needed to operate the The preferred site for the Maintenance and Storage Facility has line been determined based on the following criteria: • Service vehicles to be used on future LRT lines • Site Characteristics (topography, grade, land use compatibility, expansion capability and environmental • House the operations control centre (signalling, considerations) communications) for the line • Facility Operations (turnaround loops, track redundancy, • Be the primary heavy maintenance facility for the LRT layout efficiency and municipal services) network Maintenance of the LRVs is crucial to maintain vehicle • System Operations (connectivity to the line, efficiency and manufacturer's warranties, minimize long term operating costs access to freight rail), and and provide for system safety and reliability. The Maintenance • Relative Costs (capital, operating, maintenance and and Storage Facility will accommodate the following elements property ownership and acquisition) on-site: The proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility for the DOTT 9-35 • Main facility building housing offices, roster areas, meeting project will be located on lands to the west of the existing OC rooms and control equipment Transpo headquarters and bus maintenance facility located on • Storage yard for regular cleaning and minor maintenance the north side of Belfast Road, west of St. Laurent Boulevard and south of the VIA rail corridor. In order to access this • Repair areas for heavy and light maintenance areas for location, a connecting track is required between the DOTT vehicles alignment and the Maintenance and Storage Facility.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Report to Rapport Au
    1 Report to Rapport au: Transit Commission Commission du transport en commun 19 June 2019 / 19 juin 2019 Submitted on June 10, 2019 Soumis le 10 juin 2019 Submitted by Soumis par: John Manconi, General Manager / Directeur général, Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports Contact Person Personne ressource: John Manconi, General Manager / Directeur général Transportation Services Department / Direction générale des transports 613-580-2424 ext./poste 52111, [email protected] Ward: CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA File Number: ACS2019-TSD-TS-0002 VILLE SUBJECT: Confederation Line: Customer Service Operational Readiness OBJET: Ligne de la Confédération : Préparation opérationnelle du service à la clientèle REPORT RECOMMENDATION That the Transit Commission receive this report for information. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que la Commission du transport en commun prenne connaissance de ce rapport. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The opening of O-Train Line 1, the Confederation Line, will mark an exciting and historic transformation in the way transit service is delivered in the city of Ottawa. OC Transpo has been working with the Rideau Transit Group (RTG) and partners from across the city to transform the current transit service into a world-class multimodal transit system and ensure a positive end-to-end customer experience starting on day one. The opening of Line 1 and the major changes to the bus route network that will follow, will be the largest service change ever for OC Transpo customers. Because our customers are our priority and their experience through and beyond this transitional period is important to us, OC Transpo staff are committed to ensuring that customers are prepared, comfortable and knowledgeable about these changes and the transition period in which they will occur.
    [Show full text]
  • 10.0 Environmental Effects, Significance and Mitigation
    10.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, SIGNIFICANCE AND MITIGATION To a large degree, environmental effects were avoided or minimized to the extent possible due to the nature of the project (i.e., conversion from BRT to LRT); and during the evaluation of the alternatives and the selection of the preferred alternative. Moreover, many mitigation measures have been directly incorporated into the recommended plan. This section describes the environmental benefits and potential environmental effects of the proposed project and mitigation measures for the effects that cannot be avoided. Sections Include: 10.1 Assessment Approach 10.2 Project Benefits 10.3 Impact Assessment Results, Mitigation, Significance and Residual Effects 10.4 Cumulative Effects 10.5 Accidents and Malfunctions 10.6 Municipal, Provincial, Federal or Other Approvals or Permits 10.7 Future Commitments 10-1 • the magnitude, spatial extent, and duration of the effects; irregularities, but would have no measurable effect on the 10.1 Assessment Approach • the proportion of a species population or the number of population, entity or group as a whole. An assessment was undertaken to describe the potential people affected; environmental effects, both positive and negative of the • direct or indirect effects; Positive (P): An effect that exhibits a beneficial outcome. planning, construction and operational activities associated with • the degree to which the effect responds to mitigation; and the proposed DOTT project. The definitions of significance were adopted for use in this • the level of uncertainty about the possible effect. assessment because many of the impacts cannot be quantified in The assessment of effects involves applying the following steps: absolute terms, although changes and trends can be predicted.
    [Show full text]
  • JUNE-JULY 2018 VINCENT MASSEY PUBLIC SCHOOL by Sofian Tarfas, Anthony Gellatly, Sam Rayment Photos by Thomas Cormier and Greg Mckean (Teacher)
    JUNE 2018 A Voice of Riverview Park JULY 2018 Will our new LRT be this good? by Geoff Radnor itting in my seat in an almost empty train early on a recent Sunday morning, slowly and Ssilently I started to move. My train was leaving on a trip from a capital city in Europe on its three hour trip to another city in another country. It was due to depart at 8:12 am, and it did, exactly to the minute. I had ordered and paid for my tick- et on line here in Canada, and was instructed to pick up my ticket at the station prior to boarding. Hav- ing found the railway service desk, my two tickets were in my hand in seconds, they were for a trip there and back in one day. I was advised by email a week in advance that the journey would take about 30 min- utes less than originally planned as the train was to be diverted onto One of our new trains going under the Belfast Road Bridge on a training run, May 8th 2018. The train is head- CONTINUED ON PAGE 11 ing east; there is Tremblay Road on the left and the Queensway on the right. PHOTO: JAMES RADNOR Hi, I’m Dalia! am a Grade 5 student at Riv- ership, teamwork and treating erview Alternative. I love to others with respect and kindness. write and to socialize with When a student gets a Howl Imy friends. Speaking of writing, About, their name and what they I would like to tell you about my are recognized for is put on the school and what we have been morning announcements and as doing.
    [Show full text]
  • 200 Lees Avenue Planning Rationale
    200 Lees Avenue Planning Rationale Site Plan Control Application June 2021 200 Lees Avenue Planning Rationale Site Plan Control Application June 2021 Prepared for: David Wroblewski, P.Eng., GSC, LEED GA, Senior Project Manager PCL Constructors Canada Inc. 49 Auriga Drive Nepean, Ontario K2E 8A1 T: 613-229-7104 E: [email protected] Prepared by: Nadia De Santi, RPP, MCIP, Practice Lead Planning, Landscape Architecture, and Urban Design WSP 2611 Queensview Drive, Suite 300 Ottawa, Ontario, K2B 8K2 T: 613-690-1114 E: [email protected] WSP 200 Lees Avenue Site Plan Control Application June 2021 Planning Rationale Page i PCL and University of Ottawa S i g n a t u r e s PREPARED BY Nadia De Santi, MCIP, RPP Kasper Koblauch, MCIP, RPP Practice Lead Project Planner This Planning Rationale was prepared by WSP Canada Inc. (“WSP”) for PCL on behalf of the University of Ottawa, in accordance with the agreement between WSP and the client. This Planning Rationale is based on information provided to WSP which has not been independently verified. The disclosure of any information contained in this Report is the sole responsibility of the client. The material in this Report, accompanying documents and all information relating to this activity reflect WSP’s judgment in light of the information available to us at the time of preparation of this Report. Any use which a third party makes of this Report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. WSP accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by a third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit in Ottawa
    Light Rail Transit in Ottawa January 30, 2020 Michael Morgan Director, Rail Construction Program City of Ottawa 1 Agenda • Background • Stage 1 Project • Stage 2 Project Ottawa’s Transit Challenge BRT to LRT Conversion Stage 1 Project Confederation Line Alignment Project Overview Stage 1 Confederation Line • Conversion of the existing bus “Transitway” to a 12.5km dedicated light rail transit line running • 2.5km tunnel through the downtown core • 13 stations including 3 downtown underground stations • A new Maintenance and Storage Facility where the light rail vehicles will be assembled, maintained and stored • 30 year maintenance concession period Procurement Approach Project Solutions Affordability RFP Bundled Hwy 417 Provided station Cap Innovations Expansion “innovation Project zones” Defined Service Geotechnical risk Proven Vehicle ladder and System Flexibility in Operations construction & Bundled cash Matters tunnel allowance excavation projects methodology Energy Matters Mobility Matters Rideau Transit Group (RTG) • Design Build Finance Maintain • Owned and operated by the City of Ottawa • $2.1B project including $300M in private financing • 30-year maintenance term with performance incentives • Rideau Transit Group (RTG): Design Challenges • System had to be designed to allow for long term capacity needs: 18,000 pphpd by 2031; Ultimate ridership 24,000 pphpd. • System had to designed to be fully accessible, include public art, address the need of stakeholders and include cycling/pedestrian connections. • Design consideration had
    [Show full text]
  • Active Commuting to Star Top
    Defence Research and Recherche et de´veloppement Development Canada pour la de´fense Canada CAN UNCLASSIFIED Active commuting to Star Top Some suggestions from scientist-cyclists Matthew R. MacLeod Talia J. Beech Terms of Release: This document is approved for release to Public Release. Further distribution of this document or information contained herein is prohibited without the written approval of Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC). Defence Research and Development Canada Reference Document DRDC-RDDC-2019-D077 July 2019 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by DRDC using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act. Disclaimer: This publication was prepared by Defence Research and Development Canada an agency of the Department of National Defence. The information contained in this publication has been derived and determined through best practice and adherence to the highest standards of responsible conduct of scientific research. This information is intended for the use ofthe Department of National Defence, the Canadian Armed Forces (“Canada") and Public Safety partners and, as permitted, may be shared with academia, industry, Canada’s allies, and the public (“Third Parties"). Any use by, or any reliance on or decisions made based on this publication by Third Parties, are done at their own risk and responsibility. Canada does not assume any liability for any damages or losses which may arise from any use of, or reliance on, the publication. Endorsement statement: This publication has been published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa's Light Rail Transit Project
    Ottawa’s Light Rail Transit Project November 11 – 14, 2012 Dennis Gratton, Manager - Rail Planning, City of Ottawa Presentation to the American Public Transportation Association Presentation Overview • Transit Vision for Ottawa • Challenge • Ottawa Planning Framework • Ottawa Light Rail Transit (OLRT) Project • Ottawa and TOD • Past vs. Present • Current OLRT TOD Studies • Current and Future Studies 2 Transit Vision for Ottawa 3 Challenge 4 Ottawa Planning Framework • Official Plan • Zoning By-Law • Transportation Master Plan • Community Design Plans • Transit Oriented Development Plans • Downtown Moves • Environmental Assessments 5 OLRT Project 6 OLRT Project 7 Ottawa and TOD • Mixed Land Use Density • Built Form • Pedestrian and Cyclist Connectivity with LRT Stations • Vehicles and Parking • Streetscape and the Environment 8 Past vs. Present • Medium to high density development located in a compact form within a 10-minute walking circle surrounding a transit stop or station; • Inclusion of a broad mix of uses supporting people wanting to live, work and play within a single community; • Allow people to make the majority of their daily or weekly trips without using a car; • Pedestrian oriented design; • Reduction in demand for parking inside the 10- minute walking circle around the station. 9 Current OLRT TOD Studies • TOD studies were undertaken for St. Laurent, Cyrville, and Train Stations by the City. • Additionally, the City won an IBM Smart Cities Challenge grant. • IBM provided recommendations to the City on how to increase market interest for residential and business growth in these areas. • Recommendations were presented fall 2012. 10 Current OLRT TOD Studies Density Projections TOD Plan Est. # People Est. # People Projected # Study Area Total TOD Capacity on Additional Study Area Short-term People on (long term) Sites Short-term (<20 yrs) Sites (<20 yrs) Train 39,500 25,500 10,000 St.
    [Show full text]
  • System Map , Carte De Réseau Effective September 5, 2010
    System Map , Carte de Réseau Eective September 5, 2010 - En viguer le 5 septembre 2010 Dunrobin PINECREST QUEENSWAY TUNNEY'S PASTURE BAYVIEW LEBRETON MACKENZIE KING LEES & CAMPUS LYCÉE CLAUDEL & SMYTH HERON TRAIN JEANNE D'ARC WESTBOUND ONLY EASTBOUND ONLY 95 96 97 Until 1 AM 98 LEES STATION ONLY 94 101 96 101 VERS L'OUEST SEULEMENT 154 172 181 60 61 62 86 95 96 VERS L'EST SEULEMENT 101 111 151 152 156 6 16 18 86 87 94 95 96 97 98 151 176 16 18 86 87 94 95 96 97 98 3 8 16 18 86 87 94 95 96 97 98 153 8 85 86 87 94 Jusqu'à 1 h 16 101 102 STATION LEES SEULEMENT 4 87 97 98 106 111 118 140 146 148 149 4 8 87 97 98 111 118 140 146 95 96 114 124 125 126 128 129 95 101 130 131 27 31 32 33 34 37 38 39 Arnprior 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 167 182 261 262 263 172 178 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 57 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 57 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 20 21 22 23 24 31 32 33 34 35 37 38 20 21 22 23 24 27 31 32 33 34 35 37 8 85 86 87 94 95 96 97 98 40 43 82 99 116 158 199 40 43 82 99 116 158 199 402 20 21 22 23 24 27 31 32 33 34 35 37 102 118 199 405 PM PM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AM 283 404 406 70 71 73 76 77 116 167 179 182 188 195 261 71 73 76 77 82 102 105 150 155 182 195 261 71 73 76 77 82 105 150 155 155 182 195 261 39 43 57 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 38 39 40 43 57 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 20 21 22 23 24 27 31 32 33 34 35 37 38 39 102 118 190 191 192 199 221 231 232 401 AM PM PM AM 613-560-1000 3030 (LYCÉE CLAUDEL) 613-560-1000 3035 613-560-1000 3070 Second Line 262 263 283 401 262 263 283 403 262 263 283 403 69 70 71 73 76 77 82 88 99
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report Lees Avenue Underpass, MTO Site No
    CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT LEES AVENUE UNDERPASS, MTO SITE No. 3-225 HIGHWAY 417 (OTTAWA QUEENSWAY) LOT G, CONCESSION D, RIDEAU FRONT GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF NEPEAN CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO GWP 4320-06-00 / GWP 4091-07-00 July 2011 Prepared for: MMM Group Limited Prepared by: CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUTION REPORT LEES AVENUE UNDERPASS, MTO SITE No. 3-225 HIGHWAY 417 (OTTAWA QUEENSWAY) LOT G, CONCESSION D, RIDEAU FRONT GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF NEPEAN CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO GWP 4320-06-00 / GWP 4091-07-00 July 2011 Prepared for: MMM Group Limited 1145 Hunt Club Road, Suite 300 Ottawa, ON, K1V 0Y3 Prepared by: Unterman McPhail Associates Heritage Resource Management Consultants 540 Runnymede Road Toronto, Ontario, M6S 2Z7 Tel: 416-766-7333 PROJECT PERSONNEL Unterman McPhail Associates Richard Unterman, Principal Barbara McPhail, Principal Jean Simonton Heritage Consultant TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 2.1 Nepean Township 3 2.2 The Queensway and the Lees Avenue Underpass 7 2.3 Steel Plate Girder Structures 12 2.4 Bridge Designer 12 3.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION 3.1 Area Context 13 3.2 Site 14 4.0 BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE DESCRIPTION 16 4.1 Lees Avenue Underpass, MTO Site No. 3-225 16 4.1.1 Modifications 18 4.2.2 Comparative Analysis 18 5.0 EVALUATION OF LEES AVENUE UNDERPASS 5.1 Introduction 19 5.2 Evaluation 20 5.3 Cultural Heritage Value 24 6.0 MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS 24 SOURCES APPENDIX A: Historical Maps, Photographs and Drawings APPENDIX B: Lees Avenue Underpass, Bridge Survey Form APPENDIX C: MTO East Region List of Comparable Steel Plate Girder Structures APPENDIX D: Evaluation Criteria, Ontario Heritage Bridge Guidelines for Provincially Owned Bridges (Interim-January 2008) LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.
    [Show full text]