<<

Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 689–696

Lutein-based plumage coloration in is a consequence of selective pigment incorporation into feathers

K.J. McGrawa, *, M.D. Beebeebc , G.E. Hill , R.S. Parker d

aDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA bDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA cDepartment of Biological Sciences, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA dDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Received 21 April 2003; received in revised form 28 May 2003; accepted 28 May 2003

Abstract

Many birds obtain colorful carotenoid pigments from the diet and deposit them into growing tissues to develop extravagant red, orange or yellow sexual ornaments. In these instances, it is often unclear whether all dietary pigments are used as integumentary colorants or whether certain carotenoids are preferentially excluded or incorporated into tissues. We examined the carotenoid profiles of three New World that display yellow plumage coloration— the yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia), common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas) and (Coccoth- raustes vespertinus). Using high-performance liquid chromatography, we found that all species used only one carotenoid— lutein—to color their plumage yellow. Analyses of blood carotenoids (which document those pigments taken up from the diet) in two of the species, however, revealed the presence of two dietary xanthophylls—lutein and zeaxanthin—that commonly co-occur in plants and animals. These findings demonstrate post-absorptive selectivity of carotenoid deposition in bird feathers. To learn more about the site of pigment discrimination, we also analyzed the carotenoid composition of lipid fractions from the follicles of immature yellow-pigmented feathers in G. trichas and D. petechia and again detected both lutein and zeaxanthin. This suggests that selective lutein incorporation in feathers is under local control at the maturing feather follicle. ᮊ 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Carotenoids; Coccothraustes vespertinus; Common yellowthroat; Dendroica petechia; Evening grosbeak; Geothlypis trichas; HPLC; Physiological discrimination; Yellow warbler; Zeaxanthin

1. Introduction these pigments from the diet and deliver them to peripheral tissues such as feathers and skin for Many animals, particularly birds and fishes, use pigmentation (reviewed in McGraw and Hill, carotenoid pigments to develop striking red, orange 2001). The physiological underpinnings of carot- and yellow patches of color that are used as signals enoid coloration have been of recent interest as ( of quality to attract mates reviewed in Olson and potentially costly means of exaggerating colorful ) Owens, 1998; Hill, 1999; Møller et al., 2000 .To sexual traits (Hill, 1996, 2000; McGraw et al., in develop their sexual colors, animals must acquire press). For most carotenoid-pigmented species, howev- *Corresponding author. Tel.: q1-607-254-4365; fax: q1- 607-254-4308. er, the physiological processes that govern the E-mail address: [email protected] (K.J. McGraw). expression of pigment-based ornaments are not

1096-4959/03/$ - see front matter ᮊ 2003 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S1096-4959(03)00164-7 690 K.J. McGraw et al. / Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 689–696 well defined. While the actual chemical com- into feathers and only a portion of their yellow- pounds used to color feathers and bare parts have tipped contour feathers had emerged from the now been described for several fishes (Torrissen sheath. By collecting these ‘primordial’ feathers, et al., 1989; Scheidt, 1998) and songbirds (Stradi, we were able to analyze the carotenoids contained 1998), it is rare that we also know the full within lipid droplets that accumulate in cells of complement of carotenoids that these animals the feather blastema prior to deposition (Dessel- acquire from the diet or how these animals physi- berger, 1930; Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972; Menon ologically apportion the available pigments for and Menon, 2000), to document those pigments color display. It is conceivable that animals follow that are delivered directly to the feather follicle for very specific biochemical strategies for becoming pigmentation. This allowed us to determine wheth- colorful, selectively accumulating and displaying er feather follicles could exert local control over only certain pigments, while failing to utilize pigment deposition by discriminating among sev- others or perhaps saving them for different physi- eral different carotenoids that were transported to ological functions (e.g. immunomodulation, vita- the site through the blood. min synthesis). Only with detailed accounts of the carotenoids present in the diet and body fluids and 2. Methods tissues can we begin to understand the biochemical specificity of these pigmentation systems. 2.1. Collection of samples In this study, we used high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to characterize the carot- During the breeding season of 2002, M.D.B. enoid pigments present in three colorful collected yellow breast feathers from each of three species (Aves: Passeriformes)—the yellow warbler wild-caught male and female yellow warblers in (Dendroica petechia), the common yellowthroat Pennsylvania. These feathers were stored in sealed (Geothlypis trichas) and the evening grosbeak envelopes in the dark until they were analyzed in (Coccothraustes vespertinus)—so that we could October 2002. On 14 August 2002, K.J.M. cap- follow the fate of carotenoids through the body to tured a molting male yellow warbler and a molting feathers. These species are united by the colorful male common yellowthroat in Ithaca, New York. yellow plumage that they display throughout the From each individual, we plucked 5 yellow breast year and regrow each autumn. In all of the species, feathers and collected 20–40 ml of whole blood. there is some evidence suggesting that this pre- Blood was centrifuged and the plasma saved for sumed carotenoid-based plumage coloration serves analysis. From these birds, we also collected 10 a sexual function. Male warblers, yellowthroats still-growing (‘primordial’) contour feathers that and grosbeaks develop more colorful yellow plum- were emerging from their sheaths. All of these age than do females of their species (K.J.M., pers. samples were analyzed later that day. On 14 obs.), and more colorful male yellowthroats September 2002, P. Dunn collected yellow breast acquire more extra-pair mates than less colorful feathers and blood from three wild-caught molting individuals (C. Freeman-Gallant, unpublished yellowthroats (2 males, 1 female) in Saukville, data). Wisconsin. Plasma and feathers were stored at First, we obtained yellow breast feathers from y80 8C and analyzed in mid-October 2002. Last, all species and determined their carotenoid com- we obtained breast feathers from 10 evening gros- position. We were also able to capture yellow beaks as donations from the Auburn University warblers and yellowthroats from the wild at the Natural History Museum (4 males, 4 females) and time they were growing their colorful feathers. In the Museum of Vertebrates at Cornell University these individuals, we obtained a recent record of (1 male, 1 female). These specimens ranged in those carotenoids taken up from the diet by draw- age from 4 to 33 years. ing a blood sample. We then compared their blood- carotenoid profile with that of freshly plucked 2.2. Carotenoid analyses yellow feathers, to determine which circulated pigments were being used as plumage colorants. 2.2.1. Fully grown feathers Last, we found feathers on some molting individ- Feathers were first washed in ethanol and hex- uals that were at a very early stage of growth—at ane (sequentially) to remove surface lipids. We a time when carotenoids were still being deposited then blotted the feathers dry on filter paper, K.J. McGraw et al. / Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 689–696 691 trimmed off the yellow-pigmented barbules and for 10 s. Then we added 100-ml tert-butyl methyl added these to 1-ml acidified pyridine in a 9-ml ether before vortexing for another 10 s, centrifug- glass tube (sensu Hudon and Brush, 1992; ing, removing the supernatant and evaporating the McGraw et al., 2002a). We filled the headspace solvent in a fresh HPLC tube (as above).Tobe of the tube with argon and held the solution at 95 sure that we acquired all of the not-yet-keratinized 8C for 3 h. After cooling to room temperature, we carotenoids from the feather primordia, we also added 1-ml water, vortexed the mix and then added dissected the sheath away from the immature 1-ml tert-butyl methyl ether. We shook the tube feather and rinsed out remaining lipids with 100- for 2 min and centrifuged at 3000 RPM for 5 min. ml ethanol and 100-ml tert-butyl methyl ether The upper, colored phase (containing the carote- (recall that feather carotenoids are bound tightly noids) was transferred to a 1.5-ml HPLC vial and in keratin and cannot be removed using simple evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen. organic-solvent-based techniques such as this one). We resuspended the carotenoids in 200-ml HPLC These two fractions (dropletqrinse) containing all mobile phase (methanol:acetonitrile, 1:1, vyv) pri- undeposited pigments were pooled for HPLC or to analysis. analysis. We injected 50 ml of each sample into a Waters௣ 717plus Autosampler HPLC (Millipore 3. Results Corp., Bedford, MA) fitted with a Develosil RPA- queous RP-30 column (250=4.6 mm ID; Nomura 3.1. Carotenoids in yellow feathers Chemical Co. Ltd, Japan). We used an isocratic system (HP 1050 Series Isocratic Pump) at a HPLC chromatograms showed that the yellow plumage from all three species contained the same constant flow rate of 1 mlymin for 45 min. Data carotenoid profile (Fig. 1). One peak, identified as were collected from 250 to 600 nm using a ( s s ௣ ( all-trans lutein tRmax18.7 min, l 448 and 476 Waters 996 photodiode array detector Waters ) Chromatography, Milford, MA). Feather pigments nm , comprised over 60% of all eluted products. were identified by comparing their retention times The remaining 40% of signals consisted of four peaks that matched the retention times and absorb- (t ) and absorption properties (l values) with Rmaxance properties of a series of cis lutein isomers authentic reference carotenoids donated by Roche ( ) ( ) Vitamins Inc. (Parsippany, NJ) and Dr Riccardo Fig. 1 . On the basis of tests using pure all-E , Stradi (University of Milan, Italy). crystalline lutein, we found that these Z isomers are formed as artifacts during the thermochemical extraction procedure (Mays et al., in press). 2.2.2. Plasma In a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube, we added 100-ml 3.2. Carotenoids in plasma ethanol to 10-ml thawed plasma. We vortexed the tube for 5 s and then added 100-ml tert-butyl Although only one carotenoid was detected in methyl ether. After vortexing again for 5 s, we feathers, we identified two main xanthophylls in centrifuged the tube for 4 min in an Eppendorf the plasma of molting male yellowthroats and centrifuge (model 5414). The supernatant was ( s yellow warblers: lutein and zeaxanthin tR 21.0 removed, transferred to a clean HPLC vial and s )( ) min, lmax 453 and 481 nm Table 1 . Lutein evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. HPLC ana- was still the predominant pigment, occurring at lytical procedures follow those given above. greater than 85% of total in all samples (Table 1). In addition to these polar xanthophylls, small 2.2.3. Primordial feathers quantities of two non-polar pigments—b-crypto- Freshly plucked immature feathers often oozed xanthin (2–3% of total) and b-carotene (f1% of a droplet of yellow liquid out the base of the shaft. total)—were also present (see McGraw et al., Carotenoids are known to accumulate in these 2002b for methods). lipoidal droplets before they are embedded into feathers during the final stages of keratinization 3.3. Carotenoids in lipid fractions from primordial (Desselberger, 1930; Lucas and Stettenheim, 1972; feathers Menon and Menon, 2000). To analyze carotenoids in this lipid fraction, we added 100-ml ethanol to Because these songbirds appeared to be prefer- 10-ml droplet in an Eppendorf tube and vortexed entially accumulating lutein as a plumage pigment, 692 K.J. McGraw et al. / Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 689–696

Fig. 1. Representative HPLC chromatogram of yellow feathers from an adult male common yellowthroat. We found all-trans lutein in these feathers, plus cis isomers that were formed during the thermochemical extraction process (Mays et al., in press; see Methods for additional details of the analytical HPLC procedure). Chromatograms for the other two yellow-colored bird species studied here were identical to this one.

Table 1 Carotenoid composition (% of total"S.E.) of fully formed feathers, blood and unkeratinized lipid fractions from maturing feather follicles in four passerines that display yellow plumage coloration

Species Site n Lutein (%) Zeaxanthin (%) Common yellowthroat Feather 5 100 0 Blood 4 89"29"2 Follicle 1 85 14 Yellow warbler Feather 7 100 0 Blood 1 85 12 Follicle 1 86 13 Evening grosbeak Feather 10 100 0 Yellow-breasted chat Feather 21 100 0 Data from yellow-breasted chats are taken from Mays et al. (in press). K.J. McGraw et al. / Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 689–696 693 we were interested in examining the anatomical 3-hydroxy-echinenone in the long-tailed tit, Aegi- site of pigment discrimination. Since circulating thalos caudatus; Stradi, 1998). Moreover, in spe- levels in blood should reach the maturing feather, cies that use lutein as a feather colorant, its close we decided to test the carotenoid content of the molecular relative, zeaxanthin, or a zeaxanthin- lipid fractions not yet keratinized into growing derivative such as dehydrolutein, almost always feathers. Extracts from primordial feathers in yel- co-exist (Stradi, 1998). This finding begged the lowthroats and yellow warblers yielded notable question of whether or not lutein was the sole levels of both lutein and zeaxanthin, closely match- pigment available to these birds for incorporation ing those found in blood (Table 1; it should be into feathers. noted that the yellowthroat from which primordial To address this issue, we sampled blood from feathers were plucked showed a lutein:zeaxanthin yellowthroats and yellow warblers at the time of ratio of 86:14 in plasma). Subsequent tests of the feather growth and determined the carotenoid con- keratinized, yellow feather portions from these tent of plasma. We detected a series of four primordia (carotenoids extracted with heated pyr- carotenoids in the blood of these molting birds. idine) still yielded lutein only. Two xanthophylls, lutein and zeaxanthin, were predominant, making up over 95% of all carote- 4. Discussion noids in blood. This is a common feature of songbirds, including many (e.g. American For decades, physiological modes of carotenoid goldfinch, Carduelis tristis; K.J.M., unpublised discrimination have been of interest to biochemists, data) and sparrows (e.g. northern , Cardi- particularly those studying human nutrition and nalis cardinalis; K.J.M., unpublished data), the means by which carotenoids with pro-vitamin although lutein was comparatively more abundant ( ) A activity e.g. b-carotene are assimilated from than zeaxanthin than has been observed previously. dietary sources (Erdman et al., 1993; Parker, 1996; ) This may be a reflection of the mainly insect- Furr and Clark, 1997 . Within the last few years, based foods that the warblers in this study con- there has been a parallel attraction to the process sume, as opposed to the typical seed and fruit diets of carotenoid utilization in birds, but as it relates of finches and sparrows (Goodwin, 1980, 1984). to the allocation of carotenoids to the nutritive In addition to these polar xanthophylls, we also egg-yolk (Surai et al., 1998, 2001a; Blount et al., isolated very small quantities of two non-polar 2002) and subsequently to the tissues of develop- carotenoids—b-carotene and b-cryptoxanthin. It is ing embryos (Surai and Speake, 1998; Surai et al., unclear if these low concentrations were due to 2001b). With the emerging interest in the mecha- low levels in the diet, inefficient uptake (see more nisms that control the expression of colorful carot- below) or rapid clearance from the system via enoid-derived feather colors, we set out to study hepatic and intestinal conversion to vitamin A the extent to which pools of circulating carotenoids ( ) were selectively incorporated into growing Wyss et al., 2001 . feathers. Nevertheless, the absence of zeaxanthin, b- We investigated the carotenoid profiles of three carotene and b-cryptoxanthin in feathers suggests yellow-colored passerines to learn more about the that, at some level, these birds are discriminating degree to which specific carotenoid pigments were among potential plumage pigments in blood and physiologically favored or disfavored as plumage selectively accumulating lutein over all others. The colorants. These birds all used lutein as the lone failure of these warblers to use b-carotene and b- pigment in yellow feathers. This is also true of a cryptoxanthin is not all that surprising, given the fourth songbird species with yellow plumage—the widely held view that birds, reptiles and fishes, yellow-breasted chat (Icteria virens; Mays et al., unlike humans, selectively accumulate polar in press). The presence of only a single carotenoid hydroxy- and ketocarotenoids over non-polar car- pigment in feathers is rare among birds. Most otenes (Schiedt, 1989; Scheidt, 1998; Raila et al., species use a mixture of dietary compounds or 2002). As further support of this idea, American metabolic derivatives (e.g. canary xanthophylls, 4- goldfinches fed concentrated supplements of b- oxo-carotenoids) to color their feathers (Stradi, carotene failed to incorporate this pigment into 1998); there are only a few instances in which a feathers to grow orange plumage (McGraw et al., single red pigment confers color on feathers (e.g. 2001). 694 K.J. McGraw et al. / Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 689–696

However, given the fact that a dietary xantho- binding protein in the gut (Jouni and Wells, 1996) phyll such as lutein was present in feathers, the and the silk gland (Tabunoki et al., 2002) of the absence of zeaxanthin was unexpected. As indi- silkworm (Bombyx mori) and the recently charac- cated above, zeaxanthin is nearly always found in terized xanthophyll-binding protein that facilitates conjunction with lutein in both photosynthetic accumulation and retention of xanthophylls in the organisms and animals (Goodwin, 1980, 1984). human maculayretina (Yemelyanov et al., 2001). One possible explanation for the absence of zea- However, in these instances, it is not apparent that xanthin in these feathers is that it was destroyed any protein is specific to lutein and not to zeax- during the thermochemical pigment-extraction pro- anthin. Despite being termed a ‘lutein-binding cess. However, when we subjected pure, crystalline protein’, no information is available on the binding zeaxanthin (donated by R. Stradi, University of capacity of zeaxanthin to the silkworm caroteno- Milan, Italy) to the acidified-pyridine treatment, it protein (K. Tsuchida, pers. comm.). Moreover, the was recovered fully (with no modification to lutein macular protein in human retina selectively harbors or its isomers). Moreover, using this same extrac- both lutein and zeaxanthin (but exhibits no binding tion technique, we have previously isolated zea- activity toward canthaxanthin, a ketocarotenoid, xanthin from the feathers of other songbirds (e.g. and b-carotene, an unsubstituted carotenoid). Cel- the red-winged blackbird, Agelaius phoeniceus; lular, genetic and immunological work is needed K.J.M., unpublished data). Thus, we are confident to determine if a unique binding protein with that lutein is the only carotenoid present in the exquisite specificity for lutein exists in bird yellow feathers under study. Consequently, this feathers. result indicates post-absorptive selective accumu- Why might these birds selectively incorporate lation of lutein (over zeaxanthin) in yellow feath- lutein into and exclude zeaxanthin from feathers? ers. We are unaware of a parallel system of specific From a mechanistic standpoint, there may be hydroxycarotenoid discrimination in vertebrates. molecular interactions between carotenoids, as We further investigated this process of lutein they compete for limited access to micelles during sequestration and zeaxanthin exclusion in yellow- absorption or to protein binding sites during tissue feathered passerines by sampling carotenoids at deposition (van den Berg, 1999); in this case, the site of feather growth. Since blood delivers lutein may outcompete zeaxanthin for binding sites nutrients to maturing feathers, and yet blood did in feather follicles. At the functional level, it is not solely contain lutein, we suspected that the especially perplexing why a more conjugated (and developing feather was the site of pigment discrim- thus more colorful) molecule like zeaxanthin is ination. By plucking immature, still-growing yel- not shunted to brightly colored feathers that prob- low feathers in two of the study species, we ably are used as sexual or social signals to attract obtained yellow-colored lipid fractions (containing mates or repel competitors. One intriguing possi- carotenoids) that were not yet keratinized into bility is that with its more conjugated state comes feathers. We found that this material contained superior antioxidant activity over lutein (e.g. Mor- both lutein and zeaxanthin, in a ratio that was tensen and Skibsted, 1997), such that zeaxanthin nearly identical to that found in the blood of these may be saved in living tissue for intracellular free- molting birds. These data suggest that the maturing radical-scavenging rather than made inaccessible follicle exerts local control over pigment incorpo- by allocating it to non-living feathers. Another ration into bird feathers (sensu Giersberg and idea is that extrinsic selection pressures such as Stadie, 1933; Brockmann and Volker,¨ 1934),in predation and light environment (e.g. Andersson, this case by preferentially excluding zeaxanthin. 2000) favor yellow lutein-based plumage colora- This regulatory feat is probably accomplished tion over the more orange hue that would be by a binding protein located in follicular cells. generated by the incorporation of zeaxanthin into Numerous carotenoid-binding proteins (or caroten- feathers. oproteins) have been characterized in plants In the end, the fact that species from three (Lakshman and Okoh, 1993; Reddy et al., 1993) different songbird families (Lovette and Berming- and invertebrates (Zagalsky, 1995), including the ham, 2002) follow this system of pigmentation well-known crustacyanin complex in lobster (Keen suggests that it is a rather conserved trait among et al., 1991). Of relevance to selective hydroxy- New World passerines (parvorder , super- carotenoid retention in this study is the lutein- family Passeroidea). We encourage more biochem- K.J. McGraw et al. / Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 689–696 695 ical work in other yellow-colored birds across the subunit of the carotenoid pigment complex, crustacyanin. world to determine how widespread this form of Euro. J. Biochem. 202, 31–40. carotenoid discrimination truly is. Lakshman, M.R., Okoh, C., 1993. Carotenoid-protein com- plexes. Meth. Enzymol. 214, 74–86. Lovette, I., Bermingham, E., 2002. What is a wood-warbler? Acknowledgments Molecular characterization of a monophyletic Parulidae. Auk 119, 695–714. The authors thank A. Clark, K. McGowan and Lucas, A.M. and Stettenheim, P.R., 1972. Avian Anatomy— D. Robinson for assistance with bird netting, P. Integument. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 362, Dunn for collecting yellowthroat samples, P. Stet- Washington, DC. Mays, Jr., H.L., McGraw, K.J., Ritchison, G., Cooper, S., Rush, tenheim for advice on the process of carotenoid V. and Parker, R.S., Sexual dichromatism in the yellow- deposition in bird feathers and three anonymous breasted chat (Icteria virens): spectrophotometric analysis referees who improved the manuscript. This and biochemical basis. J. Avian Biol., in press. research was supported by an Environmental Pro- McGraw, K.J., Gregory, A.J., Parker, R.S., Adkins-Regan, E., tection Agency graduate fellowship to K.J.M. in press. Diet, plasma carotenoids, and sexual coloration in the zebra (Taeniopygia guttata). Auk 120, in press. McGraw, K.J., Hill, G.E., 2001. Carotenoid access and intra- References specific variation in plumage pigmentation in male Ameri- can goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) and northern cardinals Andersson, S., 2000. Efficacy and content in avian colour (Cardinalis cardinalis). Funct. Ecol. 15, 732–739. signals. In: Espmark, Y., Amundsen, T., Rosenqvist, G. McGraw, K.J., Hill, G.E., Stradi, R., Parker, R.S., 2001. The (Eds.), Animal Signals: Signalling and Signal Design in influence of carotenoid acquisition and utilization on the Animal Communication. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, maintenance of species-typical plumage pigmentation in Norway, pp. 47–60. male American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis) and northern Blount, J.D., Surai, P.F., Houston, D.C., Møller, A.P., 2002. cardinals (Cardinalis cardinalis). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. Patterns of yolk enrichment with dietary carotenoids in 74, 843–852. gulls: the roles of pigment acquisition and utilization. Funct. McGraw, K.J., Hill, G.E., Stradi, R., Parker, R.S., 2002a. The Ecol. 16, 445–453. effect of dietary carotenoid access on sexual dichromatism Brockmann, H., Volker,¨ O., 1934. Der gelbe Federfarbstaff and plumage pigment composition in the American gold- w ( )x des Kanarienvogels Serinus canaria canaria L. und das finch. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. 131, 261–269. Vorkommen von Carotinoiden bei Vogeln.¨ H-S Z. Physiol. McGraw, K.J., Adkins-Regan, E., Parker, R.S., 2002b. Anhy- Chem. 224, 193–215. drolutein in the zebra finch: a new, metabolically derived Desselberger, H., 1930. Ueber das Lipochrom der Vogelfeder. carotenoid in birds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 132, J. Ornithol. 78, 328–376. 811–818. Erdman Jr., J.W., Bierer, T.L., Gugger, E.T., 1993. Absorption Menon, G.K., Menon, J., 2000. Avian epidermal lipids: func- and transport of carotenoids. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 691, tional considerations and relationship to feathering. Am. 76–85. Zool. 40, 540–552. Furr, H.C., Clark, R.M., 1997. Intestinal absorption and tissue distribution of carotenoids. Nutr. Biochem. 8, 364–377. Møller, A.P., Biard, C., Blount, J.D., et al., 2000. Carotenoid- Giersberg, H., Stadie, R., 1933. Zur Entstehung der Gelben dependent signals: indicators of foraging efficiency, immu- und Roten Gefiederfarben der Vogel.¨ Z. Vergl. Physiol. 18, nocompetence, or detoxification ability? Avian Poult. Biol. 696–708. Rev. 11, 137–159. Goodwin, T.W., 1980. The Biochemistry of the Carotenoids, Mortensen, A., Skibsted, L.H., 1997. Importance of carotenoid vol. I: Plants. Chapman and Hall, London. structure in radical-scavenging reactions. J. Agric. Food Goodwin, T.W., 1984. The Biochemistry of the Carotenoids, Chem. 45, 2970–2977. vol. II: Animals. Chapman and Hall, London. Olson, V.A., Owens, I.P.F., 1998. Costly sexual signals: are Hill, G.E., 1996. Redness as a measure of the production cost carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, of ornamental coloration. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 8, 157–175. 510–514. Hill, G.E., 1999. Mate choice, male quality, and carotenoid- Parker, R.S., 1996. Absorption, metabolism, and transport of based plumage coloration. Proc. Int. Ornithol. Congr. 22, carotenoids. FASEB J. 10, 542–551. 1654–1668. Raila, J., Schuhmacher, A., Gropp, J., Schweigert, F.J., 2002. Hill, G.E., 2000. Energetic constraints on expression of carot- Selective absorption of carotenoids in the common green enoid-based plumage coloration. J. Avian Biol. 31, 559–566. iguana (Iguana iguana). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 132, Hudon, J., Brush, A.H., 1992. Identification of carotenoid 513–518. pigments in birds. Meth. Enzymol. 213, 312–321. Reddy, K.J., Bullerjahn, G.S., Sherman, L.A., 1993. Charac- Jouni, Z.E., Wells, M.A., 1996. Purification and partial char- teristics of membrane-associated carotenoid-binding proteins acterization of lutein-binding protein from the midgut of the in cyanobacteria and prochlorophytes. Meth. Enzymol. 214, silkworm Bombyx mori. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14722–14726. 390–401. Keen, J.N., Caceres, I., Eliopoulos, E.E., Zagalsky, P.F., Find- Schiedt, K., 1989. New aspects of carotenoid metabolism in lay, J.B.C., 1991. Complete sequence and model for the A2 animals. In: Krinsky, N.I., Mathews-Roth, M.M., Taylor, 696 K.J. McGraw et al. / Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 135 (2003) 689–696

R.F. (Eds.), Carotenoids: Chemistry and Biology. Plenum tion by the avian embryo: a lesson from wild birds. Comp. Press, New York, pp. 247–268. Biochem. Physiol. B 128, 743–750. Scheidt, K., 1998. Absorption and metabolism of carotenoids Tabunoki, H., Sugiyama, H., Tanaka, Y., et al., 2002. Isolation, in birds, fish and crustaceans. In: Britton, G., Liaaen-Jensen, characterization, and cDNA sequence of a carotenoid bind- S., Pfander, H. (Eds.), Carotenoids: Biosynthesis, vol. 3. ing protein from the silk gland of Bombyx mori larvae. J. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 285–355. Biol. Chem. 277, 32133–32140. Stradi, R., 1998. The Colour of Flight. Solei Gruppo Editoriale Torrissen, O.J., Hardy, R.W., Shearer, K.D., 1989. Pigmentation Informatico. Milan, Italy. of salmonids—carotenoid deposition and metabolism. Rev. Surai, P.F., Ionov, I.A., Kuchimistova, E.F., Noble, R.C., Aquat. Sci. 1, 209–225. Speake, B.C., 1998. The relationship between the levels of van den Berg, H., 1999. Carotenoid interactions. Nutr. Rev. a-tocopherol and carotenoids in the maternal feed, yolk, 57, 1–10. and neonatal tissues: comparison between the chicken, Wyss, A., Wirtz, G.M., Woggon, W.D., et al., 2001. Expression turkey, duck and goose. J. Sci. Food Agric. 76, 593–598. 9 Surai, P.F., Speake, B.K., 1998. Distribution of carotenoids pattern and localization of beta,beta-carotene 15,15 -dioxy- from the yolk to the tissues of the chick embryo. J. Nutr. genase in different tissues. Biochem. J. 354, 521–529. Biochem. 9, 645–651. Yemelyanov, A.Y., Katz, N.B., Bernstein, P.S., 2001. Ligand- Surai, P.F., Speake, B.K., Sparks, N.H.C., 2001a. Carotenoids binding characterization of xanthophyll carotenoids to sol- in avian nutrition and embryonic development. 1. Absorp- ubilized membrane proteins derived from human retina. tion, availability and levels in plasma and egg yolk. Poult. Exp. Eye Res. 72, 381–392. Sci. 38, 1–27. Zagalsky, P.F., 1995. Carotenoproteins. In: Britton, G., Liaaen- Surai, P.F., Speake, B.K., Wood, N.A.R., Blount, J.D., Borto- Jensen, S., Pfander, H. (Eds.), Carotenoids: Isolation and lotti, G.R., Sparks, N.H.C., 2001b. Carotenoid discrimina- Analysis, vol. 1A. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 287–294.