DOCSLIB.ORG

Golden-Winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Golden-Winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan Golden-winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan i Golden-winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan Editors: Amber M. Roth, Ronald W. Rohrbaugh, Tom Will, and David A. Buehler Front cover art by: Ann-Kathrin Wirth. Back cover art by: Reyn Oriji. Chapter 1: Golden-winged Warbler Status Review Chapter 2: Golden-winged Warbler Full Life Cycle Conservation Strategy Chapter 3: Golden-winged Warbler Breeding Season Conservation Plan Chapter 4: Golden-winged Warbler Non- breeding Season Conservation Plan (to be added in the future) Photo by Roger Erikkson. RECOMMENDED CITATION Roth, A.M., R.W. Rohrbaugh, T. Will, and D.A. Buehler, editors. 2012. Golden-winged Warbler Status Review and Conservation Plan. www.gwwa.org/ ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Recommended Citation ................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................................ vi Preface ....................................................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER 1: Golden-winged Warbler Status Review................................................................................1–1 CHAPTER 2: Golden-winged Warbler Full Life Cycle Conservation Strategy............................................2–1 Recommended Citation ............................................................................................................................2–1 Acknowledgments.....................................................................................................................................2–2 Chapter Summary .....................................................................................................................................2–4 Conservation Strategy...............................................................................................................................2–5 Canadian Recovery Strategy .....................................................................................................................2–8 Critical Habitat Identification in Canada .............................................................................................2–10 Associated Species and Plans..................................................................................................................2–10 Conservation Actions ..............................................................................................................................2–14 Goal 1: Increase population size of Golden-winged Warbler by increasing quantity and quality of breeding habitat across the breeding range at multiple scales..........................................................2–14 Goal 2: Increase Golden-winged Warbler survival through protection and enhancement of habitat during the non-breeding season and by addressing non-habitat limiting factors. ............................2–21 CHAPTER 3: Golden-winged Warbler Breeding Season Conservation Plan .............................................3–1 Acknowledgments.....................................................................................................................................3–2 Recommended Citation ............................................................................................................................3–4 Chapter Summary .....................................................................................................................................3–5 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................3–6 Definition of Regions and Focal Areas ......................................................................................................3–8 Conservation Regions ...........................................................................................................................3–8 Focal Areas and Priorities .....................................................................................................................3–9 Population and Habitat Goals .................................................................................................................3–10 Management Guidelines.........................................................................................................................3–12 Quick Start Guide................................................................................................................................3–13 Determining Appropriate Landscape Context ................................................................................3–14 Developing Habitat at Management Sites and Patches .................................................................3–15 Part I: Comprehensive Management Guide for Creating and Maintaining Breeding Habitat............3–20 iii Landscape Scale—Selecting Management Sites.............................................................................3–21 Management Site Scale...................................................................................................................3–27 Patch Area and Configuration.........................................................................................................3–28 Management Techniques ...............................................................................................................3–34 Other Habitat Management Considerations ..................................................................................3–44 Part II: Reference Guide to Focal Areas .............................................................................................3–46 The Appalachian Conservation Region ...............................................................................................3–46 Mid-Atlantic Subregion (Focal areas A1–A7) ..................................................................................3–47 Northern Appalachian Subregion (Focal Area A8)..........................................................................3–51 Central Appalachian Subregion (Focal Areas A9–A11) ...................................................................3–54 Southern Appalachian-Cumberland Subregion (Focal Areas A12–A14) .........................................3–57 Southern Appalachian-Nantahala Subregion (Focal Areas A15–A18) ............................................3–60 The Great Lakes Conservation Region ................................................................................................3–63 Northwest Subregion (Focal Areas GL1–GL2).................................................................................3–64 Lake of the Woods Subregion (Focal Area GL3)..............................................................................3–67 Minnesota-Wisconsin Core Subregion (Focal Areas GL4–GL6).......................................................3–70 Lower Michigan Subregion (Focal Areas GL7–GL8) ........................................................................3–73 Eastern Ontario Subregion (Focal Areas GL9–GL11).......................................................................3–76 New England Subregion (Focal Areas GL12–GL16).........................................................................3–79 Implementation ......................................................................................................................................3–82 Golden-winged Warbler Working Group............................................................................................3–82 Golden-winged Warbler Working Group Objectives......................................................................3–82 Canadian Recovery Team....................................................................................................................3–82 Next Steps ...........................................................................................................................................3–83 Evaluating Accomplishments ..................................................................................................................3–84 Strategy for Evaluating Population and Habitat Goals .......................................................................3–84 Habitat Tracking..............................................................................................................................3–84 Population Response by Golden-winged Warbler..........................................................................3–85 Response of Associated Species .....................................................................................................3–87 Coordination of Evaluation Strategy...............................................................................................3–87 Evaluating Response at Management Site .........................................................................................3–88 Evaluating Progress toward Conservation Objectives ........................................................................3–88 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................................................. LC–1 iv APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................................AP–1 Appendix A. Glossary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Revision of the Mexican Piculus (Picidae) Complex
    THE WILSON BULLETIN A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE OF ORNITHOLOGY Published by the Wilson Ornithological Society VOL. 90, No. 2 JUNE 1978 PAGES 159-334 WilsonBdl., 90(Z), 1978, pp. 159-181 A REVISION OF THE MEXICAN PZCULUS (PICIDAE) COMPLEX LUIS F. BAPTISTA The neotropical woodpeckers of the genus Piculus are closely related to the flickers (Colaptes) (Short 1972). P icu 1us species range from Mexico to southern Brazil, Paraguay, Peru (Ridgway 1914) and Argentina (Salvin and Godman 1892). Peters (1948) lists 46 taxa (9 species and their sub- species) of which 20 are subspecies of Piculus rubiginosus, the most widely distributed species. The latter ranges from southern Veracruz to the north- western provinces of Jujuy, Salta, and Tucuman in Argentina (Peters 1948). Compared with other picids, this genus is generally poorly represented in museum collections. It is possible that they are not as rare as they seem, but being rather silent and secretive birds and difficult to distinguish from the associated vegetation due to their cryptic green coloration, are easily passed unnoticed by collectors in the field. A difference of opinion exists among taxonomists regarding the status of several of the Mexican forms. Two species complexes are recognized in the Mexican check-list (Miller et al. 1957). The Piculus auricularti complex is reported by these authors as consisting of 2 subspecies: sonoriensis known only from the type series of 3 birds taken at Ranch0 Santa Barbara, Sonora, and the nominate race auricularis recorded as ranging from Sinaloa south to Guerrero. They point out the uncertain status of the form sonorien- sis, stating that additional material is needed to substantiate it.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Co-Occurrence in Woodpeckers and Nocturnal Cavity-Nesting Owls Within an Idaho Forest
    VOLUME 13, ISSUE 1, ARTICLE 18 Scholer, M. N., M. Leu, and J. R. Belthoff. 2018. Patterns of co-occurrence in woodpeckers and nocturnal cavity-nesting owls within an Idaho forest. Avian Conservation and Ecology 13(1):18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-01209-130118 Copyright © 2018 by the author(s). Published here under license by the Resilience Alliance. Research Paper Patterns of co-occurrence in woodpeckers and nocturnal cavity- nesting owls within an Idaho forest Micah N. Scholer 1, Matthias Leu 2 and James R. Belthoff 1 1Department of Biological Sciences and Raptor Research Center, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA, 2Biology Department, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA ABSTRACT. Few studies have examined the patterns of co-occurrence between diurnal birds such as woodpeckers and nocturnal birds such as owls, which they may facilitate. Flammulated Owls (Psiloscops flammeolus) and Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadicus) are nocturnal, secondary cavity-nesting birds that inhabit forests. For nesting and roosting, both species require natural cavities or, more commonly, those that woodpeckers create. Using day and nighttime broadcast surveys (n = 150 locations) in the Rocky Mountain biogeographic region of Idaho, USA, we surveyed for owls and woodpeckers to assess patterns of co-occurrence and evaluated the hypothesis that forest owls and woodpeckers co-occurred more frequently than expected by chance because of the facilitative nature of their biological interaction. We also examined co-occurrence patterns between owl species to understand their possible competitive interactions. Finally, to assess whether co-occurrence patterns arose because of species interactions or selection of similar habitat types, we used canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) to examine habitat associations within this cavity-nesting bird community.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Monitoring of Night-Migrating Birds: a Progress Report
    Acoustic Monitoring of Night-Migrating Birds: A Progress Report William R. Evans Kenneth V. Rosenberg Abstract—This paper discusses an emerging methodology that to give regular vocalizations in night migration are the vireos uses electronic technology to monitor vocalizations of night-migrat- (Vireonidae), flycatchers (Tyrannidae), and orioles (Icterinae). ing birds. On a good migration night in eastern North America, If a monitoring protocol is consistently maintained, an array thousands of call notes may be recorded from a single ground-based, of microphone stations can provide information on how the audio-recording station, and an array of recording stations across a species composition and number of vocal migrants vary across region may serve as a “recording net” to monitor a broad front of time and space. Such data have application for monitoring migration. Data from pilot studies in Florida, Texas, New York, and avian populations and identifying their migration routes. In British Columbia illustrate the potential of this technique to gather addition, detection and classification of distinctive call-types information that cannot be gathered by more conventional methods, is possible with computers (Mills 1995; Taylor 1995), thus such as mist-netting or diurnal counts. For example, the Texas information on bird populations might be gained automati- station detected a major migration of grassland sparrows, and a cally. In this paper, we summarize the current state of station in British Columbia detected hundreds of Swainson’s knowledge for identifying night-flight calls to species; present Thrushes; both phenomena were not detected with ground monitor- selected results from four ongoing studies that are monitoring ing efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal 2017-C-15 Below)
    AOS Classification Committee – North and Middle America Proposal Set 2017-C 15 March 2017 No. Page Title 01 02 Revise the linear sequence of genera in Fringillidae, and transfer Serinus mozambicus to Crithagra 02 09 Split Brown Creeper (Certhia americana) into two species 03 16 Transfer Violet-bellied Hummingbird from Damophila to Juliamyia 04 18 Elevate Colaptes auratus mexicanoides to species rank 05 23 Split Nashville Warbler (Oreothlypis ruficapilla) into two species 06 26 Adopt new English names for Melozone biarcuata and Melozone cabanisi 07 29 Lump Thayer’s Gull (Larus thayeri) with Iceland Gull (Larus glaucoides) 08 43 Change the spelling of the English names of Le Conte’s Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) and Le Conte’s Sparrow (Ammodramus leconteii) 09 46 Add Common Scoter (Melanitta nigra) to the Main List 10 49 Add Blyth’s Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus dumetorum) to the Main List 11 52 Add Chatham Albatross (Thalassarche eremita) to the Main List 12 55 Add Red-legged Honeycreeper (Cyanerpes cyaneus) to the U.S. list 13 57 Add nine species recorded from Greenland to the Main List 14 68 Split Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii) into two species 1 2017-C-1 N&MA Classification Committee pp. 658-679 Revise the linear sequence of genera in Fringillidae, and transfer Serinus mozambicus to Crithagra Background: In the past decade, several phylogenetic papers have elucidated relationships within the Fringillidae (Arnaiz-Villena et al. 2007, 2008, Nguembock et al. 2009, Lerner et al. 2011, Zuccon et al. 2012). NACC already has taken a series of actions (reviewed below) based on this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Salt Eating in Birds
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1980 An Analysis of Salt Eating in Birds Kathryn Julia Herson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Herson, Kathryn Julia, "An Analysis of Salt Eating in Birds" (1980). Master's Theses. 1909. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1909 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ANALYSIS OF SALT EATING IN BIRDS by KATHRYN JULIA HERSON A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Biology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1880 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am very graceful for Che advice and help of my thesis committee which conslsced of Dr8, Richard Brewer, Janes Erickson and Michael McCarville, I am parclcularly thankful for my major professor, Dr, Richard Brewer for his extreme diligence and patience In aiding me with Che project. I am also very thankful for all the amateur ornithologists of the Kalamazoo, Michigan, area who allowed me to work on their properties. In this respect I am particularly grateful to Mrs. William McCall of Augusta, Michigan. Last of all I would like to thank all my friends who aided me by lending modes of transportation so that I could pursue the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of Mixed-Species Insectivorous Bird Flocks in Western Mexico’
    The Condor 89~282-292 0 The Cooper Omithologml Society 1987 A DESCRIPTION OF MIXED-SPECIES INSECTIVOROUS BIRD FLOCKS IN WESTERN MEXICO’ RICHARD L. HUTTO Department of Zoology, Universityof Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 Abstract. Insectivorousbird flockswere observed in all typesof forestedhabitats during the nonbreedingseason in westernMexico. The speciescomposition of flockschanged markedlyand predictablyamong five categoriesof habitat type. The averagenumber of speciesper flockin lowlandhabitats was 4.7, while a mean of 18.6 speciesparticipated in highlandflocks, ranking the latter amongthe most species-richflocks in the world. The meanproportion of the localinsectivorous species that participatedin mixed-speciesflocks wassignificantly greater in the highlands(6 1.3%)than in the lowlands(24.6%). About half of the flock participantsin both undisturbedlowland and highlandhabitats were north temperatemigrants, ranking west Mexican flocks among the mostmigrant-rich in the world as well. In highlandflocks, the maximum numberof individualsper attendantspecies was generallytwo to three,but therewere often six to twelveindividuals belonging to eachof severalnuclear species. The lowlanddeciduous forest flocks seemed to lack nuclearspecies. Key words: Mixed-speciesflocks; insectivorousbirds; Mexico; migratory birds;pine-oak woodlands;tropical deciduous forests. INTRODUCTION mixed-speciesflocks in 26 sites(Appendix I) that Mixed-speciesinsectivorous bird flockshave been were distributed among various habitats described from temperate and tropical areas throughout western Mexico. The habitat types worldwide (Rand 1954), and are known to occur that I surveyed can be roughly classified (after in practically every habitat type (Powell 1985). Pesman 1962) as belonging to either lowland Although mixed-species flocks are quite com- (tropical deciduous and tropical evergreen) or mon in north temperate regions during the non- highland (oak, pine-oak, and boreal) forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Macgillivrays Warbler
    Wyoming Species Account MacGillivray’s Warbler Geothlypis tolmiei REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: Migratory Bird USFS R2: No special status USFS R4: No special status Wyoming BLM: No special status State of Wyoming: Protected Bird CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: No special status WGFD: NSS4 (Bc), Tier II WYNDD: G5, S4 Wyoming Contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern PIF Continental Concern Score: 11 STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS MacGillivray’s Warbler (Geothlypis tolmiei) does not have any additional regulatory status or conservation rank considerations beyond those listed above. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: Two subspecies of MacGillivray’s Warbler are recognized and known to breed in the United States: G. t. tolmiei and G. t. monticola 1. In Wyoming, G. t. monticola is the known subspecies; it breeds east of the Pacific slope, in the Rocky Mountains and Great Basin, and winters in higher elevations of central and southern Mexico, occasionally in southern California 2, 3. Two additional subspecies of G. tolmiei are not recognized by the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU): G. t. intermedia and G. t. austinsmithi. The distinguishing characteristic is reported to be a shorter tail length in G. t. austinsmithi and there are specimens of said subspecies from western Wyoming 1, 4. Recent molecular phylogeny efforts concluded that MacGillivray’s Warbler is more closely related to the genus Geothlypis 5. The AOU approved the genus change in 2011 6. Prior to this, the species was placed in the genus Oporornis. Description: The species is a small wood-warbler in the Parulidae Family. MacGillivray’s Warbler is identifiable in the field during the breeding season. Male upperparts are olive green and underparts are yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • Programs and Field Trips
    CONTENTS Welcome from Kathy Martin, NAOC-V Conference Chair ………………………….………………..…...…..………………..….…… 2 Conference Organizers & Committees …………………………………………………………………..…...…………..……………….. 3 - 6 NAOC-V General Information ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..………….. 6 - 11 Registration & Information .. Council & Business Meetings ……………………………………….……………………..……….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………..…..……...….. 11 6 Workshops ……………………….………….……...………………………………………………………………………………..………..………... 12 Symposia ………………………………….……...……………………………………………………………………………………………………..... 13 Abstracts – Online login information …………………………..……...………….………………………………………….……..……... 13 Presentation Guidelines for Oral and Poster Presentations …...………...………………………………………...……….…... 14 Instructions for Session Chairs .. 15 Additional Social & Special Events…………… ……………………………..………………….………...………………………...…………………………………………………..…………………………………………………….……….……... 15 Student Travel Awards …………………………………………..………...……………….………………………………..…...………... 18 - 20 Postdoctoral Travel Awardees …………………………………..………...………………………………..……………………….………... 20 Student Presentation Award Information ……………………...………...……………………………………..……………………..... 20 Function Schedule …………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………..…………. 22 – 26 Sunday, 12 August Tuesday, 14 August .. .. .. 22 Wednesday, 15 August– ………………………………...…… ………………………………………… ……………..... Thursday, 16 August ……………………………………….…………..………………………………………………………………… …... 23 Friday, 17 August ………………………………………….…………...………………………………………………………………………..... 24 Saturday,
    [Show full text]
  • Landbird Monitoring in the Sonoran Desert Network 2012 Annual Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Landbird Monitoring in the Sonoran Desert Network 2012 Annual Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SODN/NRTR—2013/744 ON THE COVER Hooded Oriole (Icterus cucullatus). Photo by Moez Ali. Landbird Monitoring in the Sonoran Desert Network 2012 Annual Report Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SODN/NRTR—2013/744 Authors Moez Ali Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory 230 Cherry Street, Suite 150 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Kristen Beaupré National Park Service Sonoran Desert Network 7660 E. Broadway Blvd, Suite 303 Tucson, Arizona 85710 Patricia Valentine-Darby University of West Florida Department of Biology 11000 University Parkway Pensacola, Florida 32514 Chris White Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory 230 Cherry Street, Suite 150 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Project Contact Robert E. Bennetts National Park Service Southern Plains Network Capulin Volcano National Monument PO Box 40 Des Moines, New Mexico 88418 May 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colora- do, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource manage- ment, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Nashville Warbler (Oreothlypis Ruficapilla) Julie A
    Nashville Warbler (Oreothlypis ruficapilla) Julie A. Craves Port Huron State Game Area, St. Clair Co., MI June, 2009 © Willie McHale (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) Nashville Warblers are common migrants said it was common “in the north.” A similar pattern held in both MBBA I and MBBA II, throughout the state as they journey between with breeding concentrated in the UP and their wintering areas in the Neotropics and eastern NLP; Atlas records were slightly scarcer northern breeding sites. There are two widely in the western NLP in both periods. This separate breeding populations: one in the distribution likely corresponds with the favored northwestern U.S. and parts of adjacent Canada, nesting habitat of the eastern population, which and the other in north central to eastern Canada, includes tamarack swamps and spruce-cedar New England, the upper Great Lakes, and the bogs, and occasionally jack pine or second Appalachians to West Virginia (Williams 1996). growth aspen stands (Williams 1996). Participants in MBBA I found nesting Nashville It has been commonly believed that the eastern Warblers most often in mesic and wet conifer population winters mainly in northeastern forests and mesic mixed forests. Mexico to Guatemala, while the western population winters in California and western In the SLP, the actual summer status of Mexico (Curson et al. 1994, Williams 1996). Nashville Warblers is a bit unclear. In MBBA I, However, recent molecular studies found the southernmost confirmed nesting was in eastern breeding individuals throughout the Midland Co. There were no confirmations and entire wintering range; the analysis included only five townships with records at the level of feather samples taken in southeastern Michigan probable in the SLP.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers
    Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Brandan L. Gray August 2019 © 2019 Brandan L. Gray. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers by BRANDAN L. GRAY has been approved for the Department of Biological Sciences and the College of Arts and Sciences by Donald B. Miles Professor of Biological Sciences Florenz Plassmann Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT GRAY, BRANDAN L., Ph.D., August 2019, Biological Sciences Ecology, Morphology, and Behavior in the New World Wood Warblers Director of Dissertation: Donald B. Miles In a rapidly changing world, species are faced with habitat alteration, changing climate and weather patterns, changing community interactions, novel resources, novel dangers, and a host of other natural and anthropogenic challenges. Conservationists endeavor to understand how changing ecology will impact local populations and local communities so efforts and funds can be allocated to those taxa/ecosystems exhibiting the greatest need. Ecological morphological and functional morphological research form the foundation of our understanding of selection-driven morphological evolution. Studies which identify and describe ecomorphological or functional morphological relationships will improve our fundamental understanding of how taxa respond to ecological selective pressures and will improve our ability to identify and conserve those aspects of nature unable to cope with rapid change. The New World wood warblers (family Parulidae) exhibit extensive taxonomic, behavioral, ecological, and morphological variation.
    [Show full text]