Consider And/Or Act Upon Resolution Number 19-R-908 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Order with Sigma Surveillance, Inc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
13-0429What to Do with Texas' Undercrowded Prisons-Schulman
Published By eMail: [email protected] Web Page: www.texindbar.org Texas Independent Bar Association Austin, Texas 78767 Copyright © 2013 Texas Independent Bar Association and the following Commentators Alan Curry John G. Jasuta Doug O’Brien Helena Faulkner Charles Mallin Greg Sherwood Jeffrey S. Garon Gail Kikawa McConnell David A. Schulman Lee Haidusek Angela J. Moore Kevin P. Yeary Editor-in-Chief: John G. Jasuta Clicking a hyperlink (such as a judge’s name) will load the linked opinion It is TIBA’s policy that commentators do not summarize or comment on or document in your web browser. cases in which they were involved. Volume 21, Number 17 ~ Monday, April 29, 2013 (No. 958) Featured Article What to Do with Texas’ Undercrowded Prisons? © 2013 - David A. Schulman and John G. Jasuta RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS According to figures gleaned from the official website site of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”), Texas currently has 114 facilities, some operated by private contractors, but the majority operated by the State (see Table “A” attached hereto), which are capable of housing approximately 164,000 inmates. As the current Texas legislative session winds down, “inquisitive minds” wonder if there will be an effort by the Legislature to cut some long terms costs by closing some of the current units. In an article in the Fort-Worth Star Telegram (“Lawmakers Look to Close Private Prison in Mineral Wells”), writer Dave Montgomery detailed discussions in the Senate Finance Committee on the question of whether the State should close the privately run prison in Mineral Wells. -
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Programs Division Department Report January 2014
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Programs Division Department Report January 2014 Manger: Phone #: Program Head: Phone #: Marvin Dunbar 936.437.6267 Bill Pierce and Michael Rutledge 936.437.8684 MISSION The mission of the Chaplaincy Department of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) is to positively impact public safety and the reduction of recidivism through the rehabilitation and re-integration of adult felons into society. This is accomplished by the availability of comprehensive pastoral care, by the management of quality programming, and through the promotion of therapeutic religious community activities. It is the purpose of Chaplaincy to provide guidance and nurture to those searching for meaning in life and to those offenders who are in transition. Programs, activities, and community participation are prudently managed wherein individuals have an opportunity to pursue religious beliefs, reconcile relationships, and strengthen the nuclear family. AUTHORITY Administrative Directive: AD 07.30 (rev. 6) Chaplaincy services shall be provided within TDCJ operated units or contracted facilities in order to serve offenders who desire to practice elements of their religion. It is the policy of TDCJ to extend to offenders of all faiths, reasonable and equitable opportunities to pursue religious beliefs and participate in religious activities and programs that do not endanger the safe, secure, and orderly operation of the Agency. Participation in all religious activities and attendance at religious services of worship is strictly voluntary. No employee, contractor, or volunteer shall disparage the religious beliefs of any offender or compel any offender to make a change of religious preference. Chaplaincy services shall strive to assist offenders who desire to incorporate religious beliefs and practices into a process for positive change in personal behaviors by offering meaningful, rehabilitative religious programming as an important tool for successful reintegration into society. -
Private Prisons in Texas
Texas Private Prisons / !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !?!? !? !?!? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !?!? !? 0 30 60 90 120 Miles !? !? !? !?!? Making Profit on Crime !? !? By Steve Ediger !? For Grassroots Leadership How to cite ETOPO1: Amante, C. and B. W. Eakins, ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute !? CGomlmoubniatyl E Rduecaltiieonf CMenotedrsel:!? ProCcoreredctiuonrse Cso,rp D. oaf Atmae rSicaources a!?nd ALanSalley Ssoiusth. wNesOt CAorArections !? GTEOe cGhronupical Memorand!?umM NanaEgeSmDenItS an dN TGrainDinCg C-o2rp4o,r a1tio9n p!?p, MLCaSr cChorrections 2009.<br>Hillshade visualization by J. Varner and!? E. ELmimera,l dC CoIRrreEctioSn,s University of Colorado at Boulder and NOAA/NGDC. Table of Contents and Credits Table of Contents Credits Front Cover Global Relief Introduction 1 • Amante, C. and B. W. Eakins, ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Table of Counties/Facilities 2 Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Angelina 6 Analysis. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS Bexar 7 NGDC-24, 19 pp, March 2009 Bowie 8 • Hillshade visualization by J. Varner and E. Lim, Brooks 9 CIRES, University of Colorado at Boulder and Burnet 10 NOAA/NGDC. Caldwell 11 United States Census Bureau Concho 12 Goldberg DW. [Year]. Texas A&M University Dallas 13 Geoservices. Available online at Dickens 14 http://geoservices.tamu.edu. Ector 15 Last accessed 10/26/2012 Falls 16 Grassroots Leadership Fannin 17 United States Federal Bureau of Prisons Frio 18 Texas Department of Criminal Justice Garza 19 Harris 20 United -
The Dictionary Legend
THE DICTIONARY The following list is a compilation of words and phrases that have been taken from a variety of sources that are utilized in the research and following of Street Gangs and Security Threat Groups. The information that is contained here is the most accurate and current that is presently available. If you are a recipient of this book, you are asked to review it and comment on its usefulness. If you have something that you feel should be included, please submit it so it may be added to future updates. Please note: the information here is to be used as an aid in the interpretation of Street Gangs and Security Threat Groups communication. Words and meanings change constantly. Compiled by the Woodman State Jail, Security Threat Group Office, and from information obtained from, but not limited to, the following: a) Texas Attorney General conference, October 1999 and 2003 b) Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Security Threat Group Officers c) California Department of Corrections d) Sacramento Intelligence Unit LEGEND: BOLD TYPE: Term or Phrase being used (Parenthesis): Used to show the possible origin of the term Meaning: Possible interpretation of the term PLEASE USE EXTREME CARE AND CAUTION IN THE DISPLAY AND USE OF THIS BOOK. DO NOT LEAVE IT WHERE IT CAN BE LOCATED, ACCESSED OR UTILIZED BY ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSON. Revised: 25 August 2004 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A: Pages 3-9 O: Pages 100-104 B: Pages 10-22 P: Pages 104-114 C: Pages 22-40 Q: Pages 114-115 D: Pages 40-46 R: Pages 115-122 E: Pages 46-51 S: Pages 122-136 F: Pages 51-58 T: Pages 136-146 G: Pages 58-64 U: Pages 146-148 H: Pages 64-70 V: Pages 148-150 I: Pages 70-73 W: Pages 150-155 J: Pages 73-76 X: Page 155 K: Pages 76-80 Y: Pages 155-156 L: Pages 80-87 Z: Page 157 M: Pages 87-96 #s: Pages 157-168 N: Pages 96-100 COMMENTS: When this “Dictionary” was first started, it was done primarily as an aid for the Security Threat Group Officers in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ). -
13-0401 a Brief History of Prisons In
Published By eMail: [email protected] Web Page: www.texindbar.org Texas Independent Bar Association Austin, Texas 78767 Copyright © 2013 Texas Independent Bar Association and the following Commentators Alan Curry John G. Jasuta Doug O’Brien Helena Faulkner Charles Mallin Greg Sherwood Jeffrey S. Garon Gail Kikawa McConnell David A. Schulman Lee Haidusek Angela J. Moore Kevin P. Yeary Editor-in-Chief: John G. Jasuta Clicking a hyperlink (such as a judge’s name) will load the linked opinion It is TIBA’s policy that commentators do not summarize or comment on or document in your web browser. cases in which they were involved. Volume 21, Number 13 ~ Monday, April 1, 2013 (No. 954) Featured Article A Brief History of Prisons in America - Part II © 2013 - David A. Schulman RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS Private Prisons Forty years ago, there were virtually no private prisons in the United States. In 1987, the number of inmates incarcerated in privately operated correctional facilities worldwide was 3,100; by 1998 the number had risen to 132,000. Today, there are approximately 130,000 people locked up in private prisons being run by for-profit companies. Although I have figures on which to rely, it seems to me that this trend parallels the trend towards privatization of governmental services which has occurred over the same period. In the period following the Jimmy Carter presidency, up to the present day, the list of government functions which have been converted to private ones (toll roads, anyone?) seems to be almost endless. As much as I might like to add my voice to those complaining about toll roads and the problems (and inconveniences) associated with them, this article will explore only the privatization of our jails and prisons. -
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH INVITATION TO BID Vendor Name: _____________________________________ ITB No.: 19 – 024 Dental PSPIX2s Address: _____________________________________ Submittal Deadline: July 15, 2019 3:00 PM; local Galveston, Texas time _____________________________________ Phone: ___________________________________________ Contact Information Buyer: Helen Larrabee, CTPM E-mail: __________________________________________ Phone No: (936) 437 -6768 e-mail: [email protected] Authorized Signature: _______________________________ Printed Signature: __________________________________ Date: ____________________________________________ THIS ITB IS A SOLICITATION FOR BID AND IS NOT A CONTRACT OR AN OFFER TO CONTRACT. 1.0 Bid Instructions and Award Process 1.1 This Invitation to Bid (ITB) must be completed, signed and returned with your bid for the items/products listed per Attachment 1 – Specifications/Statement of Work and Price Schedule. Failure to sign and return this form and a completed Price Schedule and adherence to all requirements directed herein will be a basis for disqualification. 1.2 One (1) electronic version must be submitted and received in the UTMB Purchasing Department on or before the time and date specified above and e-mailed to: e-mail: [email protected] Instructions for e-mail bids: • Bidder is responsible for verifying receipt of e-mail by UTMB. • Proposal must be signed and in an Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) or Microsoft Office format (Zip files are acceptable). • Any e-mail response over ten megabytes (10MB) in size will be rejected. • UTMB is not responsible for internet outages or other circumstances that may affect Bidder’s electronic submission. • E-mail submission MUST be sent to the address noted above in Section 1.2. Emails sent to the Contact at the top of this document will NOT be accepted. -
When Family Deploys
DETAILS: PATROLLING THE NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2013 PERIMETER Meet CAI The newest members of the CCA family Do you have what it takes to earn CCA’s new Distinguished Service Award? Longtime employees find their stride at North Fork Correctional Facility Supporting one another WHEN FAMILY DEPLOYS OUR PEOPLE OUR COMMUNITY OUR COMPANY WWW.CCA.COM/INSIDECCAinsidecca.com 1 In this Issue ON THE COVER Correctional Officer Melanie Varnedoe at her brother’s send-off, as he deployed to Afghanistan. Photo courtesy of Hardeman County Correctional Center. CONTRIBUTORS Annette Caldwell Daniel Crandall John Diffenderfer The Ethics Department Louise Grant On page 4, discover the newest members of the CCA family, Correctional Alternatives, Inc. Elijah Light DeAndra Mack FEATURES COLUMNS Mike Machak Shermaine Nettles 4 CAI 3 From the President’s Desk Jenna Slocum An introduction to a different version 8 Facility Focus of corrections. Stacey Sparrow 9 Facility Spotlight: Lee 11 Introducing a New Service Award Adjustment Center CCA unveils a new annual award for CONTACT US exceptional service. 10 Service Awards We welcome reader feedback and inquiries. Write to InsideCCA: 12 An Army of Support 11 Contest Hardeman County Correctional [email protected] 15 Details: The Perimeter Center embraces our nation’s armed Ten things to watch for when you find services while caring for one of their yourself on the other side of the fence. own. InsideCCA is published six times a year 16 Our CCA Family: Barton Wilson 18 New Beginnings at North Fork by Corrections Corporation of America A program facilitator at Metro- Employees from transitioned facilities (CCA) for employees and friends of the Davidson County Detention Facility find a new home with CCA. -
Sunset Advisory Commission
SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION FINAL REPORT WITH LEGISLATIVE ACTION Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Managed Health Care Committee Windham School District Board of Pardons and Paroles JULY 2013 Sunset Advisory Commission Representative Dennis Bonnen Chair Senator Robert Nichols Vice Chair Representative Rafael Anchia Senator Brian Birdwell Representative Byron Cook Senator Joan Huffman Representative Harold V. Dutton, Jr. Senator Dan Patrick Representative Four Price Senator John Whitmire Casandra Ortiz Jan Newton Ken Levine Director Cover photo: The Texas Capitol is a marvel of craftsmanship down to the smallest details. The beautifully carved wood door frames are emphasized with elaborate, custom-designed bronze hinges and hardware produced especially for the building by Sargent and Co. of New Haven, Connecticut, in the late 1880s. The eight inch by eight inch hinges are inscribed with the words “Texas Capitol”, decorated with incised designs of geometric and stylized floral motifs, and weigh over seven pounds each. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE WINDHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES SUNSET FINAL REPORT WITH LEGISLATIVE ACTION JULY 2013 This document is intended to compile all recommendations and action taken by the Sunset Advisory Commission for an agency under Sunset review. The following explains how the document is expanded and reissued to include responses from agency staff and the public. l Sunset Staff Report, May 2012 – Sunset staff develops a separate report on each individual agency, or on a group of related agencies. Each report contains both statutory and management recommendations developed after the staff ’s extensive evaluation of the agency. l Sunset Staff Report with Hearing Material, May 2012 – Adds responses from agency staff and the public to Sunset staff recommendations, as well as new issues raised for consideration by the Sunset Commission at its public hearing. -
2010 Chaplaincy Dept. Monthly Reports
Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Programs Division Department Report CHAPLAINCY Manager III Department or Program Head: Phone #: Marvin Dunbar Bill Pierce and Richard Lopez (936) 437-4965 MISSION The mission of the Chaplaincy Department of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) is to positively impact public safety and the reduction of recidivism through the rehabilitation and re-integration of adult felons into society. This is accomplished by the availability of comprehensive pastoral care, by the management of quality programming, and through the promotion of therapeutic religious community activities. It is the purpose of Chaplaincy to provide guidance and nurture to those searching for meaning in life and to those offenders who are in transition. Programs, activities and community participation are prudently managed wherein individuals have an opportunity to pursue religious beliefs, reconcile relationships and strengthen the nuclear family. AUTHORITY Administrative Directive: AD 07.30 (rev. 6) Chaplaincy services shall be provided within TDCJ operated units or contracted facilities in order to serve offenders who desire to practice elements of their religion. It is the policy of TDCJ to extend to offenders of all faiths, reasonable and equitable opportunities to pursue religious beliefs and participate in religious activities and programs that do not endanger the safe, secure and orderly operation of the Agency. Participation in all religious activities and attendance at religious services of worship is strictly voluntary. No employee, contractor or volunteer shall disparage the religious beliefs of any offender or compel any offender to make a change of religious preference. Chaplaincy services shall strive to assist offenders who desire to incorporate religious beliefs and practices into a process for positive change in personal behaviors by offering meaningful, rehabilitative religious programming as an important tool for successful reintegration into society. -
Survey of Sexual Violence in Adult Correctional Facilities, 2009–11 - Statistical Tables
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics January 2014, NCJ 244227 Bureau of Justice Statistics Bureau Survey of Sexual Violence in Adult Correctional Facilities, 2009–11 - Statistical Tables Ramona R. Rantala, BJS Statistician, Jessica Rexroat, BJS Intern, and Allen J. Beck, Ph.D., BJS Statistician n 2011, correctional administrators reported Administrators were given the option of mailing back 6,660 allegations of sexual victimization in a completed form or completing it on the internet. Iprisons. Of these, 605 were substantiated based on Data collection forms can be accessed on the BJS follow-up investigation. Local jail authorities reported website. The administrators then completed a separate 2,042 allegations, of which 284 were substantiated. form for each substantiated incident, providing details About half (51%) involved allegations of about the victim, perpetrator, and circumstances nonconsensual sexual acts or abusive sexual contacts surrounding the incident. · of inmates with other inmates, and half (49%) The 2009, 2010, and 2011 surveys included all federal Tables Statistical involved staff sexual misconduct or sexual harassment and state prisons, facilities operated by the U.S. directed toward inmates. While the overall number military and ICE, and a representative sample of jail of allegations reported by authorities in adult jurisdictions, privately operated jails and prisons, and correctional facilities rose from an estimated 6,241 in jails holding adults in Indian country. In total, data 2005 to 8,763 in 2011, the number of substantiated were collected from facilities containing 1.99 million incidents did not change significantly from 2005 (885) inmates in 2009, 1.98 million inmates in 2010, and to 2011 (902). -
Criminal: How Lockup Quotas
. CRIMINAL. How Lockup Quotas and“Low-Crime Taxes” Guarantee Pro"ts for Private Prison Corporations A Publication of In the Public Interest | S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 3 IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST How Lockup Quotas and “Low-Crime Taxes” Guarantee Pro"ts Guarantee Pro"ts 2 Major Findings } 65 percent of the private prison contracts ITPI received and analyzed included occupancy guarantees in the form of quotas or required payments for empty prison cells (a “low-crime tax”). These quotas and low-crime taxes put taxpayers on the hook for guaranteeing pro"ts for private prison corporations. } Occupancy guarantee clauses in private prison contracts range between 80% and 100%, with 90% as the most frequent occupancy guarantee requirement. } Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Virginia are locked in contracts with the highest occupancy guarantee requirements, with all quotas requiring between 95% and 100% occupancy. State-speci"c Findings: } Colorado: Though crime has dropped by a third in the past decade, an occupancy requirement covering three for-pro"t prisons has forced taxpayers to pay an additional $2 million. } Arizona: Three Arizona for-pro"t prison contracts have a staggering 100% quota, even though a 2012 analysis from Tucson Citizen shows that the company’s per-day charge for each prisoner has increased an average of 13.9% over the life of the contracts. } Ohio: A 20-year deal to privately operate the Lake Erie Correctional Institution includes a 90% quota, and has contributed to cutting corners on safety, including overcrowding, areas without secure doors and an increase in crime both inside the prison and the surrounding community. -
Supporting PREA
CCA’S LEADERSHIP ON THE ELIMINATION OF INMATE SEXUAL ABUSE Sexual abuse is an important public policy and corrections industry issue that affects all correctional facilities, our employees and the inmates entrusted to our care. For years, CCA has treated all sexual abuse as a "zero tolerance" issue. For example, the article “CCA and PREA: Always Aware, Staying Vigilant” summarizes key features of CCA’s comprehensive approach to raising awareness, enhancing education, and heightening sensitivity about and affirming our zero tolerance approach toward inmate sexual abuse. CCA has endeavored to stay on the leading edge of efforts to eliminate inmate sexual abuse by establishing and maintaining a best practice sexual abuse prevention program. CCA’s program includes best practice inmate reporting methods, inmate awareness initiatives, staff training programs, inmate education, investigation procedures, and audit processes. Interested persons can find information about our practices pertaining to the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA) on our websites, including www.CCA.com and www.InsideCCA.com, where we regularly report on PREA initiatives. Key features of CCA’s sexual abuse prevention program include: - Regular oversight by our Board of Directors, including quarterly review of key program information; - Management oversight of the program through a PREA committee consisting of high-level company officers and health care, legal, and corrections professionals; - Comprehensive sexual assault prevention and incident reporting policies