DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey of Sexual Violence in Adult Correctional Facilities, 2009–11 - Statistical Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey of Sexual Violence in Adult Correctional Facilities, 2009–11 - Statistical Tables U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics January 2014, NCJ 244227 Bureau of Justice Statistics Bureau Survey of Sexual Violence in Adult Correctional Facilities, 2009–11 - Statistical Tables Ramona R. Rantala, BJS Statistician, Jessica Rexroat, BJS Intern, and Allen J. Beck, Ph.D., BJS Statistician n 2011, correctional administrators reported Administrators were given the option of mailing back 6,660 allegations of sexual victimization in a completed form or completing it on the internet. Iprisons. Of these, 605 were substantiated based on Data collection forms can be accessed on the BJS follow-up investigation. Local jail authorities reported website. The administrators then completed a separate 2,042 allegations, of which 284 were substantiated. form for each substantiated incident, providing details About half (51%) involved allegations of about the victim, perpetrator, and circumstances nonconsensual sexual acts or abusive sexual contacts surrounding the incident. · of inmates with other inmates, and half (49%) The 2009, 2010, and 2011 surveys included all federal Tables Statistical involved staff sexual misconduct or sexual harassment and state prisons, facilities operated by the U.S. directed toward inmates. While the overall number military and ICE, and a representative sample of jail of allegations reported by authorities in adult jurisdictions, privately operated jails and prisons, and correctional facilities rose from an estimated 6,241 in jails holding adults in Indian country. In total, data 2005 to 8,763 in 2011, the number of substantiated were collected from facilities containing 1.99 million incidents did not change significantly from 2005 (885) inmates in 2009, 1.98 million inmates in 2010, and to 2011 (902). 1.97 million inmates in 2011. (See Methodology for Data are from the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ (BJS) more information about the systems and facilities Survey of Sexual Violence (SSV), which has from which data were collected.) annually collected official records on allegations and The statistical tables that follow provide counts of substantiated incidents of inmate-on-inmate and allegations and substantiated incidents by type of staff-on-inmate sexual victimization since 2004. The victimization for every jurisdiction and facility in the SSV is one of a number of BJS data collections that are 2009, 2010, 2011 surveys. These tables accompany conducted to meet the mandates of the Prison Rape BJS report, Sexual Victimization Reported by Adult Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA). Correctional Authorities, 2009–11, NCJ 234904, On behalf of BJS, staff of the U.S. Census Bureau which provides national estimates and rates of sexual mailed survey forms to correctional administrators in victimization as well as an in-depth examination of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, state prison systems, substantiated incidents covering the number and public and private jails, private prisons, jails in Indian characteristics of victims and perpetrators, location, country, and facilities operated by the U.S. military time of day, nature of the injuries, impact on the and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). victims, and sanctions imposed on the perpetrators. BJS Defining sexual victimization To define sexual victimization under the Prison Rape Staff-on-inmate sexual victimization includes both consensual Elimination Act of 2003, BJS uses uniform definitions that and nonconsensual acts perpetrated on an inmate by staff. classify each sexual act by the perpetrator who carried out it Staff includes an employee, volunteer, contractor, official (i.e., inmate or staff) and the type of act. visitor, or other agency representative. Family, friends, and other visitors are excluded. Inmate-on-inmate sexual victimization involves sexual contact with a victim without his or her consent or with a victim who Staff sexual misconduct includes any act or behavior of a sexual cannot consent or refuse. nature directed toward an inmate by staff, including romantic relationships. Such acts include— Nonconsensual sexual acts are the most serious victimizations, and include— intentional touching of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks with the intent to abuse, arouse, or contact between the penis and the vagina or the penis and gratify sexual desire the anus including penetration, however slight completed, attempted, threatened, or requested sexual acts contact between the mouth and the penis, vagina, or anus occurrences of indecent exposure, invasion of privacy, or penetration of the anal or genital opening of another person staff voyeurism for sexual gratification. by a hand, finger, or other object. Staff sexual harassment includes repeated verbal statements Abusive sexual contacts are less serious victimizations, and or comments of a sexual nature to an inmate by staff. Such include— statements include— intentional touching, either directly or through clothing, of demeaning references to an inmate’s sex or derogatory the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of comments about his or her body or clothing any person repeated profane or obscene language or gestures. incidents in which the intent was to sexually exploit (rather than to harm or debilitate). Survey of Sexual Violence in Adult Correctional Facilities, 2009–11 - Statistical Tables | January 2014 2 Methodology Sampling Public jails The sampling designs for the Bureau of Justice In each year, 700 publicly operated jail facilities were selected Statistics’ (BJS) 2009, 2010, and 2011 Survey of Sexual based on data reported in BJS’s Deaths in Custody Reporting Violence (SSV) varied according to the different facilities Program (DCRP). Based on the DCRP data in each year covered under PREA. prior to the survey, the largest jail jurisdiction was selected in 45 states and the District of Columbia.2 Federal and state prisons Jail jurisdictions with ADPs greater than or equal to In each year, the survey included the Federal Bureau 1,000 inmates were also selected with certainty (128 of Prisons and all 50 state adult prison systems. Prison in 2009, 131 in 2010, and 117 in 2011). The remaining administrators were directed to report only on allegations of jail jurisdictions on the frame were then grouped into sexual victimization that occurred within publicly operated three strata. adult prison facilities and to exclude allegations involving In the 2009 sample, 99 jails (out of 1,489) with an ADP inmates held in local jails, privately operated facilities, and of 85 or fewer inmates were selected in the first stratum, facilities in other jurisdictions. 317 jails (out of 770) with an ADP of 86 to 268 inmates Privately operated state and federal prisons were selected from the second stratum, and 110 jails (out of 434) with an ADP of 269 to 999 inmates were selected In each year, a sample of 125 privately operated state and from the third stratum. federal prison facilities was drawn to produce a sample of the private prisons identified by the 2005 Census of State and In the 2010 sample, 117 jails (out of 1,476) with an ADP Federal Adult Correctional Facilities. The sampling frame of of 85 or fewer inmates were selected in the first stratum; privately operated prison facilities contained 417 facilities 247 jails (out of 762) with an ADP of 86 to 267 inmates in 2009 and 2010 and 393 in 2011 (after removing were selected from the second stratum; and 159 jails (out prisons that had closed). Facilities were sorted by average of 436) with an ADP of 268 to 999 inmates were selected daily population (ADP) in the 12-month period ending from the third stratum. June 30, 2005. In 2009 and 2010, 71 facilities with ADPs of 488 or more were selected with certainty because of their In the 2011 sample, 197 jails (out of 1,489) with an ADP size. In 2011, 69 facilities with ADPs of 445 or more were of 87 or fewer inmates were selected in the first stratum, selected with certainty (i.e., given a 100% chance of selection 120 jails (out of 773) with an ADP of 88 to 273 inmates in each sample because of their size). were selected from the second stratum, and 220 jails (out of 427) with an ADP of 274 to 999 inmates were selected The remaining facilities were sorted by region (i.e., the from the third stratum. Northeast, Midwest, South, or West), state, and ADP, and sampled systematically with probabilities proportional to During the three years, only one publicly operated jail closed their size. Fifty-four facilities were selected in 2009 and 2010, prior to data collection (in 2009). Among the remaining and 56 in 2011.1 selected jail jurisdictions in 2009, six did not respond to the survey: Among the privately operated prisons selected for the survey, 3 had closed prior to data collection in 2009, 14 in Bessemer City Jail, Bessemer, AL 2010, and 10 in 2011. Three facilities selected in 2009 were out-of-scope. Six privately operated prisons did not respond Cooke County Justice Center, Gainesville, TX to the survey in 2009: Marshall County Jail, Marshalltown, IA Carver Correctional Center, Oklahoma City, OK Oklahoma County Jail, Oklahoma City, OK Crossroads Adult Transitional Center, Chicago, IL Osage County Jail, Linn, MO Dismas Charities, El Paso, TX Roberts County Jail, Sisseton, SD. Dismas House, St. Louis, MO 1The chance that a facility would be selected was directly related to the size Joseph Coleman Center, Philadelphia, PA of the facility (i.e., within each stratum, facilities with larger ADPs had a greater chance being selected than facilities with smaller ADPs). Stepping Stones (Community Alcohol Drug Center), 2Five states with combined jail-prison systems had no public jails: Mitchell, SD. Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont. All selected and active privately operated prisons in 2010 and 2011 participated in the survey. Survey of Sexual Violence in Adult Correctional Facilities, 2009–11 - Statistical Tables | January 2014 3 Among the 700 jail jurisdictions selected in 2010, 8 did not jails in Indian country in 2009, 61 in 2010, and 59 in 2011.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TDCJ Volunteer Training and Orientation Schedule for FY10 – Updated 9/22/2009 Please Choose a Training Site That Is Most Convenient to Attend
    TDCJ Volunteer Training and Orientation Schedule for FY10 – Updated 9/22/2009 Please choose a training site that is most convenient to attend. You are encouraged to contact the facility prior to your training to verify no schedule changes have occurred. YOU MUST HAVE YOUR TRAINING LETTER TO ATTEND. Please wear proper attire. For additional information regarding the TDCJ Volunteer Program, contact the Rehabilitation Programs Division at 936-437-4961. 4304 Highway 202 11/07/09 8:00am – 12:00pm 01/12/10 6:00pm – 10:00pm ABILENE, TEXAS Beeville, TX 78102 03/11/10 6:00pm – 10:00pm 03/02/10 6:00pm – 10:00pm Middleton Transfer Facility (361) 358-9880 06/12/10 8:00am – 12:00pm 05/04/10 6:00pm – 10:00pm Visitation Room 10/14/09 1:00pm – 5:00pm 11/06/10 8:00am – 12:00pm 07/06/10 6:00pm – 10:00pm 13055 FM 3522 03/17/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm 09/07/10 6:00pm – 10:00pm Abilene, TX 79601 07/21/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm BRYAN, TEXAS 10/19/10 6:00pm – 10:00pm (325) 548-9075 11/10/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm Hamilton Unit Dawson State Jail 12/05/09 1:00pm – 5:00pm Garza West PRTC Bldg. Room 119 106 West Commerce St. 03/20/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm 4250 Highway 202 200 Lee Morrison Lane Dallas, TX 75265-0051 07/31/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm Beeville, TX 78102 Bryan, TX 77807 (214) 744-4422 12/04/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm (361) 358-9890 (979) 779-1633 10/06/09 6:00pm –10:00pm Robertson Unit 12/09/09 1:00pm – 5:00pm 09/12/09 9:00am - 1:00pm 12/01/09 6:00pm –10:00pm Unit Chapel 02/27/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm 12/05/09 9:00am - 1:00pm 02/02/10 6:00pm –10:00pm 12071 FM 3522 05/10/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm 04/06/10 6:00pm –10:00pm Abilene, TX 79601 09/15/10 1:00pm – 5:00pm BURNET, TEXAS 06/01/10 6:00pm –10:00pm (325) 548-9035 McConnell Unit Halbert SAFPF 08/03/10 6:00pm –10:00pm 10/03/09 1:00pm – 5:00pm 3001 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Programs Division Department Report August 2012
    Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Programs Division Department Report August 2012 CHAPLAINCY Manager III Department or Program Head: Phone #: Marvin Dunbar Bill Pierce and Richard Lopez (936) 437-3028 MISSION The mission of the Chaplaincy Department of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) is to positively impact public safety and the reduction of recidivism through the rehabilitation and re-integration of adult felons into society. This is accomplished by the availability of comprehensive pastoral care, by the management of quality programming, and through the promotion of therapeutic religious community activities. It is the purpose of Chaplaincy to provide guidance and nurture to those searching for meaning in life and to those offenders who are in transition. Programs, activities, and community participation are prudently managed wherein individuals have an opportunity to pursue religious beliefs, reconcile relationships, and strengthen the nuclear family. AUTHORITY Administrative Directive: AD 07.30 (rev. 6) Chaplaincy services shall be provided within TDCJ operated units or contracted facilities in order to serve offenders who desire to practice elements of their religion. It is the policy of TDCJ to extend to offenders of all faiths, reasonable and equitable opportunities to pursue religious beliefs and participate in religious activities and programs that do not endanger the safe, secure and orderly operation of the Agency. Participation in all religious activities and attendance at religious services of worship is strictly voluntary. No employee, contractor or volunteer shall disparage the religious beliefs of any offender or compel any offender to make a change of religious preference. Chaplaincy services shall strive to assist offenders who desire to incorporate religious beliefs and practices into a process for positive change in personal behaviors by offering meaningful, rehabilitative religious programming as an important tool for successful reintegration into society.
    [Show full text]
  • 13-0429What to Do with Texas' Undercrowded Prisons-Schulman
    Published By eMail: [email protected] Web Page: www.texindbar.org Texas Independent Bar Association Austin, Texas 78767 Copyright © 2013 Texas Independent Bar Association and the following Commentators Alan Curry John G. Jasuta Doug O’Brien Helena Faulkner Charles Mallin Greg Sherwood Jeffrey S. Garon Gail Kikawa McConnell David A. Schulman Lee Haidusek Angela J. Moore Kevin P. Yeary Editor-in-Chief: John G. Jasuta Clicking a hyperlink (such as a judge’s name) will load the linked opinion It is TIBA’s policy that commentators do not summarize or comment on or document in your web browser. cases in which they were involved. Volume 21, Number 17 ~ Monday, April 29, 2013 (No. 958) Featured Article What to Do with Texas’ Undercrowded Prisons? © 2013 - David A. Schulman and John G. Jasuta RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS According to figures gleaned from the official website site of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”), Texas currently has 114 facilities, some operated by private contractors, but the majority operated by the State (see Table “A” attached hereto), which are capable of housing approximately 164,000 inmates. As the current Texas legislative session winds down, “inquisitive minds” wonder if there will be an effort by the Legislature to cut some long terms costs by closing some of the current units. In an article in the Fort-Worth Star Telegram (“Lawmakers Look to Close Private Prison in Mineral Wells”), writer Dave Montgomery detailed discussions in the Senate Finance Committee on the question of whether the State should close the privately run prison in Mineral Wells.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Programs Division Department Report January 2014
    Texas Department of Criminal Justice Rehabilitation Programs Division Department Report January 2014 Manger: Phone #: Program Head: Phone #: Marvin Dunbar 936.437.6267 Bill Pierce and Michael Rutledge 936.437.8684 MISSION The mission of the Chaplaincy Department of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) is to positively impact public safety and the reduction of recidivism through the rehabilitation and re-integration of adult felons into society. This is accomplished by the availability of comprehensive pastoral care, by the management of quality programming, and through the promotion of therapeutic religious community activities. It is the purpose of Chaplaincy to provide guidance and nurture to those searching for meaning in life and to those offenders who are in transition. Programs, activities, and community participation are prudently managed wherein individuals have an opportunity to pursue religious beliefs, reconcile relationships, and strengthen the nuclear family. AUTHORITY Administrative Directive: AD 07.30 (rev. 6) Chaplaincy services shall be provided within TDCJ operated units or contracted facilities in order to serve offenders who desire to practice elements of their religion. It is the policy of TDCJ to extend to offenders of all faiths, reasonable and equitable opportunities to pursue religious beliefs and participate in religious activities and programs that do not endanger the safe, secure, and orderly operation of the Agency. Participation in all religious activities and attendance at religious services of worship is strictly voluntary. No employee, contractor, or volunteer shall disparage the religious beliefs of any offender or compel any offender to make a change of religious preference. Chaplaincy services shall strive to assist offenders who desire to incorporate religious beliefs and practices into a process for positive change in personal behaviors by offering meaningful, rehabilitative religious programming as an important tool for successful reintegration into society.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Department of Criminal Justice
    VOLUNTEER TRAINING SCHEDULE Please choose a training site that is most convenient to attend. You are required to contact the facility prior to the training to verify no schedule changes have occurred and to ensure you are on the Volunteer Training Roster. Please wear proper attire. You DO NOT need a letter from Volunteer Services to attend this training. Attending this training does not guarantee you will be approved. If you are concerned about your eligibility you are encouraged to contact Volunteer Services prior to attending. What to Bring: driver’s license, pen, completed Volunteer application For additional information regarding the TDCJ Volunteer Program contact Volunteer Services at 936-437-3026 ABILENE, TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS McConnell Unit BRYAN, TEXAS Middleton Transfer Facility Diocese of Austin Pastoral 3001 S. Emily Drive Hamilton Unit Visitation Room Center Beeville, TX 78102 PRTC Bldg. Room 119 13055 FM 3522 6225 Highway 290 E (361) 362-2300 200 Lee Morrison Lane Abilene, TX 79601 Austin, TX 78723 01/21/16 9:00am – 1:00pm Bryan, TX 77807 (325) 548-9075 (512) 926-4482 04/21/16 9:00am – 1:00pm (979) 779-1633 05/14/16 1:00pm – 5:00pm 01/09/16 12:00pm – 4:00pm 07/21/16 9:00am – 1:00pm 03/05/16 9:00am – 1:00pm 08/20/16 1:00pm – 5:00pm 04/09/16 12:00pm – 4:00pm 10/20/16 9:00am – 1:00pm 06/04/16 9:00am – 1:00pm 11/19/16 1:00pm – 5:00pm 07/16/16 12:00pm – 4:00pm 09/03/16 9:00am – 1:00pm BONHAM, TEXAS 12/03/16 9:00am – 1:00pm Robertson Unit St.
    [Show full text]
  • Row Labels Sum of Results Reported Assisted Living Facility 127974
    Row Labels Sum of Results Reported Assisted Living Facility 127974 (blank) 127974 Abilene State Supported Living Center 13542 Acceptance Home Health-Dallas 8 Adante Assisted Living 5 Alpha Senior Care Home 14 Alpine House 2 Austin State Supported Living Center 11121 Bluebonnet Elite ALF 1 Bmsh I Katy LLC Dba The Delaney At Parkway Lakes 7 Brenham State Supported Living Center 6878 Brinlee Creek Ranch 57 Brookdale Kerrville 458 CASA EVERAY 10 Center For Pursuit 7 Christian Care Communities & Services-Allen 155 Colonial Lodge Assisted Living & Memory Care 29 Corpus Christi State Supported Living Center 11718 Cypress Basin Hospice 1 Denton State Supported Living Center 13563 El Paso State Supported Living Center 9961 Home Instead Senior Care 20 Lubbock State Supported Living Center 5377 Lufkin State Supported Living Center 8961 Mercer Place 2 Mexia State Supported Living Center 10132 Parks Senior Living 1274 Rambling Oaks Courtyard ALF 78 Richmond State Supported Living Center 14001 Rio Grande State Supported Living Center 5570 San Angelo SSLC 42 San Angelo State Supported Living Center 2988 San Antonio State Supported Living Center 8192 Sentinel Gardens 36 Serenity House Assisted Living 28 Skywest Assisted Living 2 Solaris Hospice-Bowie 15 Solaris Hospice-Breckenridge 89 Solaris Hospice-Brownwood 1042 Solaris Hospice-Decatur 171 Solaris Hospice-Denton 178 Solaris Hospice-Graham 80 Solaris Hospice-Kaufman 190 Solaris Hospice-Mineral Wells 449 Solaris Hospice-Palestine 263 Solaris Hospice-San Angelo 86 Solaris Hospice-Stephenville 226 Stagecoach Senior Living 21 Sunrise Hospice 19 Sycamore Assisted Living 3 Row Labels Sum of Results Reported Tpi Lewisville Estates LLC 46 Traditions Senior Living & Memory Care 36 Trinity Oaks of Pearland ALF 92 Village Care Homes-Berean Estates 127 Village Care Homes-Spring 53 Village Care Homes-Stephen F Austin 141 Village Care Homes-Tomball 66 VIP ADC #2 11 VIP Adult Day Care 5 VIP PROVIDERS, INC 76 Willow River Farms 249 Business 15972 (blank) 15972 2S Roll Off Services, LLC 5 Abba Staffing and Consulting Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Needs Related to Regional Medical Facilities for TDCJ
    Needs Related to Regional Medical Facilities for TDCJ A Study Submitted in Response to Rider 78, TDCJ Appropriations, Senate Bill 1, 79th Legislature, 2005 Correctional Managed Health Care A Review of Needs Related to Regional Medical Facilities for TDCJ Contents Executive Summary ___________________________________________________________________________________ iv Introduction _________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Approach ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 Key Considerations ___________________________________________________________________________________ 7 Classification and Security ____________________________________________________________________________________7 Facility Missions_____________________________________________________________________________________________9 Facility Physical Plant ________________________________________________________________________________________9 Geography__________________________________________________________________________________________________9 Current Health Care Facilities ________________________________________________________________________________10 Staffing and Support Resource Availability _____________________________________________________________________10 Key Service Population Characteristics __________________________________________________________________ 11 Inventory of Current Capabilities _______________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2017 News from Kairos Prison Ministry International, Inc
    Spring 2017 News from Kairos Prison Ministry International, Inc. Vol. 43 No. 1 Thankful for This New Season! As we enter this new season that spiritual needs of incarcerated what He would go through prior brings fresh life to our outside men, women, youth, and their to and during his crucifixion, He surroundings, we also celebrate families. endured the pain and suffering to this season with the Lenten die for us and our sins. Period and resurrection of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. In We have been called into this this holy season there is so much amazing ministry to share of to remember of what Christ has God’s love and forgiveness. We done for us, not only leading up are answering the call to share to His death, but what He did the good news by ministering to after and is still doing today. those that are often forgotten by society. We are also entering our busier season with our Kairos “Therefore go and make Weekends. It’s exciting to see the disciples of all nations, list of Weekends that we pray baptizing them in the name of for every Tuesday afternoon at the Father and of the Son and of our Kairos International office, the Holy Spirit, and teaching steadily growing. them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I We are thankful for the past am with you always, to the very season as it was a time end of the age.” to prepare for the harvest of what Matthew 28:19-20 is ahead! Kairos Prison Ministry sees the Thank you for stepping out in “The Lord will open the heavens, fruit of what our volunteers are faith to answer this calling.
    [Show full text]
  • Consider And/Or Act Upon Resolution Number 19-R-908 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Order with Sigma Surveillance, Inc
    IT Department February 19, 2019 ISSUE: Consider and/or act upon Resolution Number 19-R-908 authorizing the City Manager to execute a purchase order with Sigma Surveillance, Inc. for the purchase of physical access control and video surveillance equipment and professional installation services in the amount of $321,428.38 through the Texas DIR Contract Number DIR-TSO-3459. STAFF RESOURCE/DEPARTMENT: Taylor Prentice, IT Director SUMMARY: The City of Murphy IT staff and Capital Projects Advisory Committee identified the need to replace the building security and video surveillance systems in all city buildings and utility sites. During that process, City Council determined this project would be better funded through tax notes rather than general obligation bonds due to the 7-year lifespan of the equipment. On May 7, 2018, City Council held a Special Meeting and authorized the City Manager proceed with selling $1,040,000 in tax to notes to fund certain technology improvements. On July 3, 2018, City Council approved Ordinance Number 18-07-1094 authorizing the issuance of “City of Murphy, Texas, Tax Note Series 2018”. This item includes both Tax Note Physical Security projects 2.04 and 2.05, which is for municipal buildings and utility sites, respectively. worked closely with Police and 911 CommunicationsIT staff to understand the challenges in our existing systems, and what aspects of a new system were most important to consider, as well as identify where improvements could be made, such as better camera angles/placements and additional security doors/cameras to improve our overall security level. The solution includes 89 badge readers and 74 cameras.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Prisons in Texas
    Texas Private Prisons / !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !?!? !? !?!? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !? !?!? !? 0 30 60 90 120 Miles !? !? !? !?!? Making Profit on Crime !? !? By Steve Ediger !? For Grassroots Leadership How to cite ETOPO1: Amante, C. and B. W. Eakins, ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute !? CGomlmoubniatyl E Rduecaltiieonf CMenotedrsel:!? ProCcoreredctiuonrse Cso,rp D. oaf Atmae rSicaources a!?nd ALanSalley Ssoiusth. wNesOt CAorArections !? GTEOe cGhronupical Memorand!?umM NanaEgeSmDenItS an dN TGrainDinCg C-o2rp4o,r a1tio9n p!?p, MLCaSr cChorrections 2009.<br>Hillshade visualization by J. Varner and!? E. ELmimera,l dC CoIRrreEctioSn,s University of Colorado at Boulder and NOAA/NGDC. Table of Contents and Credits Table of Contents Credits Front Cover Global Relief Introduction 1 • Amante, C. and B. W. Eakins, ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Table of Counties/Facilities 2 Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Angelina 6 Analysis. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS Bexar 7 NGDC-24, 19 pp, March 2009 Bowie 8 • Hillshade visualization by J. Varner and E. Lim, Brooks 9 CIRES, University of Colorado at Boulder and Burnet 10 NOAA/NGDC. Caldwell 11 United States Census Bureau Concho 12 Goldberg DW. [Year]. Texas A&M University Dallas 13 Geoservices. Available online at Dickens 14 http://geoservices.tamu.edu. Ector 15 Last accessed 10/26/2012 Falls 16 Grassroots Leadership Fannin 17 United States Federal Bureau of Prisons Frio 18 Texas Department of Criminal Justice Garza 19 Harris 20 United
    [Show full text]
  • The Dictionary Legend
    THE DICTIONARY The following list is a compilation of words and phrases that have been taken from a variety of sources that are utilized in the research and following of Street Gangs and Security Threat Groups. The information that is contained here is the most accurate and current that is presently available. If you are a recipient of this book, you are asked to review it and comment on its usefulness. If you have something that you feel should be included, please submit it so it may be added to future updates. Please note: the information here is to be used as an aid in the interpretation of Street Gangs and Security Threat Groups communication. Words and meanings change constantly. Compiled by the Woodman State Jail, Security Threat Group Office, and from information obtained from, but not limited to, the following: a) Texas Attorney General conference, October 1999 and 2003 b) Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Security Threat Group Officers c) California Department of Corrections d) Sacramento Intelligence Unit LEGEND: BOLD TYPE: Term or Phrase being used (Parenthesis): Used to show the possible origin of the term Meaning: Possible interpretation of the term PLEASE USE EXTREME CARE AND CAUTION IN THE DISPLAY AND USE OF THIS BOOK. DO NOT LEAVE IT WHERE IT CAN BE LOCATED, ACCESSED OR UTILIZED BY ANY UNAUTHORIZED PERSON. Revised: 25 August 2004 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A: Pages 3-9 O: Pages 100-104 B: Pages 10-22 P: Pages 104-114 C: Pages 22-40 Q: Pages 114-115 D: Pages 40-46 R: Pages 115-122 E: Pages 46-51 S: Pages 122-136 F: Pages 51-58 T: Pages 136-146 G: Pages 58-64 U: Pages 146-148 H: Pages 64-70 V: Pages 148-150 I: Pages 70-73 W: Pages 150-155 J: Pages 73-76 X: Page 155 K: Pages 76-80 Y: Pages 155-156 L: Pages 80-87 Z: Page 157 M: Pages 87-96 #s: Pages 157-168 N: Pages 96-100 COMMENTS: When this “Dictionary” was first started, it was done primarily as an aid for the Security Threat Group Officers in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ).
    [Show full text]
  • Sunset Advisory Commission
    SUNSET ADVISORY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Managed Health Care Committee Windham School District Board of Pardons and Paroles SEPTEMBER 2012 Sunset Advisory Commission Representative Dennis Bonnen Chair Senator Robert Nichols Vice Chair Representative Rafael Anchia Senator Brian Birdwell Representative Byron Cook Senator Joan Huffman Representative Harold V. Dutton, Jr. Senator Dan Patrick Representative Four Price Senator John Whitmire Casandra Ortiz Jan Newton Ken Levine Director Cover photo: The Texas Capitol is a marvel of craftsmanship down to the smallest details. The beautifully carved wood door frames are emphasized with elaborate, custom-designed bronze hinges and hardware produced especially for the building by Sargent and Co. of New Haven, Connecticut, in the late 1880s. The eight inch by eight inch hinges are inscribed with the words “Texas Capitol”, decorated with incised designs of geometric and stylized floral motifs, and weigh over seven pounds each. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CORRECTIONAL MANAGED HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE WINDHAM SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES SUNSET STAFF REPORT WITH COMMISSION DECISIONS SEPTEMBER 2012 This document is intended to compile all recommendations and action taken by the Sunset Advisory Commission for an agency under Sunset review. The following explains how the document is expanded and reissued to include responses from agency staff and the public. l Sunset Staff Report, May 2012 – Sunset staff develops a separate report on each individual agency, or on a group of related agencies. Each report contains both statutory and management recommendations developed after the staff ’s extensive evaluation of the agency. l Sunset Staff Report with Hearing Material, May 2012 – Adds responses from agency staff and the public to Sunset staff recommendations, as well as new issues raised for consideration by the Sunset Commission at its public hearing.
    [Show full text]