From Discourse to Action in Contemporary Russia: the Emergence of Authoritarian Neoliberal Governance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From Discourse to Action in Contemporary Russia: the Emergence of Authoritarian Neoliberal Governance Obshchestvennyi Kontrol’ (Public Scrutiny) from Discourse to Action in Contemporary Russia: The Emergence of Authoritarian Neoliberal Governance Submitted by Catherine Anne May Owen to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics In September 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 2 Abstract This thesis explores the emergence and proliferation of public consultative bodies (PCBs) in contemporary Russia. Created by the government and regulated by law, PCBs are formal groups of NGO leaders, academics, journalists, entrepreneurs and public figures selected by the state, that perform advisory, monitory and support functions to government departments and individuals at federal, regional and municipal levels. The concept of obshchestvennyi kontrol’ (public scrutiny) is employed by Kremlin to refer to the dual activities of oversight and assistance, which PCBs are intended to enact. First appearing ten years ago with the foundation of the Federal Public Chamber in 2004, there are now tens of thousands of PCBs in operation across the country. This thesis constitutes the first systematic analysis of PCBs in English. It uses a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach in order to explore the extent to which the portrayal of PCBs in government discourse corresponds to the practices enacted through these institutions in three regional case studies of Moscow, St Petersburg and Samara. It finds that although PCBs are presented by federal and regional leaders as means for citizens merely to assist the authorities in the performance of tasks decided by the state, in practice PCBs can enable citizens modestly to influence policy outcomes and occasionally to shape public agendas. They therefore cannot be dismissed as mere ‘window dressing’ for the authorities. The thesis shows that PCBs were created as part of the market reform of the Soviet- era public sector, in which processes of privatisation, outsourcing and decentralisation reduced the state’s ability to make public policy without input from domestic non-state actors. It argues that the limited participation in governance afforded to citizens through PCBs exemplifies practices of ‘authoritarian neoliberal governance’, a concept that captures the attempts by the state to control policy outcomes produced through new public participatory mechanisms arising from the marketization of state bureaucracy. Although the thesis focuses on the case of Russia, the concept of ‘authoritarian neoliberal governance’ raises the question of the existence of commensurable mechanisms in other non-democratic polities. 3 4 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 7 A Note on Transliteration ................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Obshchestvennyi Kontrol’ and the Network of Public Consultative Bodies ................................. 11 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 18 Chapter Outline ............................................................................................................................ 32 Chapter One: Limited Pluralism in Russian Governance 1864-2014 .............................................. 37 Zemstvos in Late Imperial Russia ................................................................................................. 39 Governance in the Soviet Union .................................................................................................. 47 Post-Soviet Governance: From Nomenclatura to a Neoliberal Public Sector? ............................ 56 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 77 Chapter Two: Constructing Authoritarian Neoliberal Governance .................................................. 80 Neoliberalizing the State .............................................................................................................. 82 From Government to Governance? ............................................................................................. 89 Authoritarian Neoliberal Governance .......................................................................................... 97 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 108 Chapter Three: Emergence ............................................................................................................ 110 From Rabochyi Kontrol’ to Narodnyi Kontrol’ ............................................................................ 113 International Discourse of ‘Good Governance’ .......................................................................... 124 The Kremlin’s Discourse of Civic Engagement in Governance ................................................... 135 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 148 Chapter Four: Hegemony ............................................................................................................... 151 Obshchestvennyi Kontrol’ of Prisons .......................................................................................... 153 Obshchestvennyi Kontrol’ of Elections ....................................................................................... 161 ‘On the Foundations of Obshchestvennyi Kontrol’ in the Russian Federation’ .......................... 173 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 182 Chapter Five: Recontextualisation and Operationalisation in the Centre: Obshchestvennyi Kontrol’ from Discourse to Action Moscow and St Petersburg ................................................................... 185 Moscow ...................................................................................................................................... 191 Local Regime .......................................................................................................................... 191 Recontextualisation ................................................................................................................ 197 Operationalisation .................................................................................................................. 204 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 212 St Petersburg .............................................................................................................................. 213 Local Regime .......................................................................................................................... 214 Recontextualisation ................................................................................................................ 218 Operationalisation .................................................................................................................. 225 5 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 231 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 232 Chapter Six: Recontextualisation and Operationalisation in the Regions: Obshchestvennyi Kontrol’ from Discourse to Action in Samara............................................................................................... 235 Local Regime .............................................................................................................................. 236 Rearticulation ............................................................................................................................. 241 Operationalisation ...................................................................................................................... 250 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 259 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 262 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................... 277 Interview Details ............................................................................................................................ 311 6 Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been completed without the input of numerous individuals, and I am deeply
Recommended publications
  • James Rowson Phd Thesis Politics and Putinism a Critical Examination
    Politics and Putinism: A Critical Examination of New Russian Drama James Rowson A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Royal Holloway, University of London Department of Drama, Theatre & Dance September 2017 1 Declaration of Authorship I James Rowson hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Abstract This thesis will contextualise and critically explore how New Drama (Novaya Drama) has been shaped by and adapted to the political, social, and cultural landscape under Putinism (from 2000). It draws on close analysis of a variety of plays written by a burgeoning collection of playwrights from across Russia, examining how this provocative and political artistic movement has emerged as one of the most vehement critics of the Putin regime. This study argues that the manifold New Drama repertoire addresses key facets of Putinism by performing suppressed and marginalised voices in public arenas. It contends that New Drama has challenged the established, normative discourses of Putinism presented in the Russian media and by Putin himself, and demonstrates how these productions have situated themselves in the context of the nascent opposition movement in Russia. By doing so, this thesis will offer a fresh perspective on how New Drama’s precarious engagement with Putinism provokes political debate in contemporary Russia, and challenges audience members to consider their own role in Putin’s autocracy. The first chapter surveys the theatrical and political landscape in Russia at the turn of the millennium, focusing on the political and historical contexts of New Drama in Russian theatre and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Businessmen V. Investigators: Who Is Responsible for the Poor Russian Investment Climate?
    BUSINESSMEN V. INVESTIGATORS: WHO IS ReSPONSIBLE FOR THE POOR RUSSIAN INVESTMENT CLIMATE? Dmitry Gololobov, University of Westminster (London, UK) This article aims to examine the extent to which Russian investigations into economic and financial crimes are influenced by such factors as systemic problems with Russian gatekeepers, the absence of a formal corporate whistle-blowing mechanism and the continuous abuse of the law by the Russian business community. The traditional critical approach to the quality and effectiveness of Russian economic and financial investigations does not produce positive results and needs to be reformulated by considering the opinions of entrepreneurs. The author considers that forcing Russian entrepreneurs, regardless of the size of their business, to comply with Russian laws and regulations may be a more efficient way to develop the business environment than attempting to gradually improve the Russian judicial system. It is also hardly possible to expect the Russian investigatory bodies to investigate what are effectively complex economic and financial crimes in the almost complete absence of a developed whistle-blowing culture. Such a culture has greatly contributed to the success of widely-publicised corporate and financial investigations in the United States and Europe. The poor development of the culture of Russian gatekeepers and the corresponding regulatory environment is one more significant factor that permanently undermines the effectiveness of economic investigations and damages the investment climate. Key words: Russia; investigation; economic crime; gatekeepers; whistleblowing. 1. Introduction The aim of this article is to analyse the ongoing conflict between Russian investigators and the Russian business community, and to make one more attempt at answering the long-standing question regarding how a satisfactory balance between the interests of effective investigation and the protection of the business community can be reached.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Another Trash Tournament Written by Eliza Grames, Melanie Keating, Virginia Ruiz, Joe Nutter, and Rhea Nelson
    Not Another Trash Tournament Written by Eliza Grames, Melanie Keating, Virginia Ruiz, Joe Nutter, and Rhea Nelson PACKET ONE 1. This character’s coach says that although it “takes all kinds to build a freeway” he is not equipped for this character’s kind of weirdness close the playoffs. This character lost his virginity to the homecoming queen and the prom queen at the same time and says he’ll be(*) “scoring more than baskets” at an away game and ends up in a teacher’s room wearing a thong which inspires the entire basketball team to start wearing them at practice. When Carrie brags about dating this character, Heather, played by Ashanti, hits her in the back of the head with a volleyball before Brittany Snow’s character breaks up the fight. Four girls team up to get back at this high school basketball star for dating all of them at once. For 10 points, name this character who “must die.” ANSWER: John Tucker [accept either] 2. The hosts of this series that premiered in 2003 once crafted a combat robot named Blendo, and one of those men served as a guest judge on the 2016 season of BattleBots. After accidentally shooting a penny into a fluorescent light on one episode of this show, its cast had to be evacuated due to mercury vapor. On a “Viewers’ Special” episode of this show, its hosts(*) attempted to sneeze with their eyes open, before firing cigarette butts from a rifle. This show’s hosts produced the short-lived series Unchained Reaction, which also aired on the Discovery Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia on the Move-The Railroads and the Exodus from Compulsory Collectivism 1861-1914
    Russia on the Move-The Railroads and the Exodus From Compulsory Collectivism 1861-1914 Sztern, Sylvia 2017 Document Version: Peer reviewed version (aka post-print) Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Sztern, S. (2017). Russia on the Move-The Railroads and the Exodus From Compulsory Collectivism 1861- 1914. (2017 ed.). Printed in Sweden by Media-Tryck, Lund University. Total number of authors: 1 Creative Commons License: Unspecified General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Russia on the Move The Railroads and the Exodus from Compulsory Collectivism 1861–1914 Sylvia Sztern DOCTORAL DISSERTATION by due permission of the School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Viewing Archiving 300
    Vol, 4, No. 10, December :;i. 1057 P. 0~Box 296, los J-1.ltos,Calif. ~6 per year Published by Track rzField News E~iwrs: Bert ahd Cordner Nelson NEv.7S SUGAR BO\i✓L, New Orleans, Dec. 29: 100-Gilne 9, 6, Givens, Oldahoma (2) (9, 7 in heat),· Garrett; La. Tech. 440~Jcur1ock; NC, 48, 5; i·1jolt, La State; Casteel, Florida State. Mile­ Grirnm, :Maryland, '1:;16.o; .ufacy,. Houston; Viliarreai.Teaas;, HH-O'Connor• Kansas State, 15., O; Singleton. North Texas~ Patterson/f cxas 'fecli •.. 440 Relay-Texas fi,•ilson, Jouthern, i:Aile Gainey~ Littlefield) 41. 5; I-fousron; Olda.homa State; Relay---Texas (Cotton, Holt, 1i ✓ ilson, Soui:hern ) 3! is. 7; Kansas 3tate; No:rch Te;x.as. BUENOS AIRES, Dec. 15, Oswaldo Suarez, new South American 5000m record of 14:16. 6• .AUSTRALIA.Dec. 12, Ivielbourne, 1000m, Murray 2: 22. D, Australia record~ Henderson 2: 23. 6, Jungwil'th 2: 23,, 8; Legge S: 07. 2. Dec. 14, Perth, Baguley, HSJ, 48'¾"; Adelaide, Birks, 211'3"; Hobart, Lincoln, 4:10. 7; Melbou:rne, Balodis, 153'6¼", Australian discus record. Dec. 15, Sydney, Bromhead 21., Ow; Jungwirth 4:12. 2; Primrose 14.4; ;:,iforris 177'10' 1-IT. Dec. 17, Sydney, 100m, Bromhead lOo 5, 21, 6y; Blue 1: 52,, 6 from Jungwirth; Lawrence & 50. 2 from Derek i.',J:oore(19) 8: 50. 8. :Cec. 19, i.vielboume, Hogan 9. 8; Lincoln 3: 46. 5, Jungwirth 3:48 0 1, Sullivan 3:49.5., Legge 3:50.,.0; Vincent 3: 53.0; Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Olympic Games Statistics – Men's 10000M
    2016 Olympic Games Statistics – Men’s 10000m by K Ken Nakamura Record to look for in Rio de Janeiro: 1) Last time KEN won gold at 10000m is back in 1968. Can Kamworor, Tanui or Karoki change that? 2) Can Mo Farah become sixth runner to win back to back gold? Summary Page: All time Performance List at the Olympic Games Performance Performer Time Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 27:01.17 Kenenisa Bekele ETH 1 Beijing 2008 2 2 27:02.77 Sileshi Sihine ETH 2 Beijing 2008 3 3 27:04.11 Micah Kogo KEN 3 Beijing 2008 4 4 27:04.11 Moses Masai KEN 4 Beijing 2008 5 27:05.10 Kenenisa Bekele 1 Athinai 2004 6 5 27:05.11 Zersenay Tadese ERI 5 Beijing 2008 7 6 27:06.68 Haile Gebrselassie ETH 6 Beijing 2008 8 27:07.34 Haile Gebrselassie 1 Atlanta 1996 Slowest winning time since 1972: 27:47.54 by Alberto Cova (ITA) in 1984 Margin of Victory Difference Winning time Name Nat Venue Year Max 47.8 29:59.6 Emil Zatopek TCH London 1948 18.68 27:47.54 Alberto Cova ITA Los Angeles 1984 Min 0.09 27:18.20 Haile Gebrselassie ETH Sydney 2000 Second line is largest margin since 1952 Best Marks for Places in the Olympics Pos Time Name Nat Venue Year 1 27:01.17 Kenenisa Bekele ETH Beijing 2008 2 27:02.77 Sileshi Sihine ETH Beijing 2008 3 27:04.11 Micah Kogo KEN Beijing 2008 4 27:04.11 Moses Masai KEN Beijing 2008 5 27:05.11 Zersenay Tadese ERI Beijing 2008 6 27:06.68 Haile Gebrselassie ETH Beijing 2008 7 27:08.25 Martin Mathathi KEN Beijing 2008 Multiple Gold Medalists: Kenenisa Bekele (ETH): 2004, 2008 Haile Gebrselassie (ETH): 1996, 2000 Lasse Viren (FIN): 1972, 1976 Emil
    [Show full text]
  • Perestroika and the Proletariat
    PERESTROIKA AND THE PROLETARIAT Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin Like most western leftists of our generation, we became socialists despite the Soviet example of authoritarian Communism. We had little patience with an earlier generation given to be more apologetic for many of the events that amounted to a tragic and terrible aberration of socialist ideals. But while we celebrated the turn to political freedom in the USSR since Gorbachev, and the revolutions in Eastern Europe in 1989, we were at the same time disturbed that the trajectory of change appeared towards capitalism. Was a transition to democratic socialism at all on the agenda, if not in Eastern Europe, then at least in the USSR? The answer mattered in terms of the scope for socialist politics in the West. Having been hamstrung in our politics (among many other reasons) by the negative example afforded by authoritarian Communism in the East ("See what socialist revolution leads to!"), were we now to be hamstrung again by the collapse of authoritarian Communism ("Even they have opted for capitalism! ")? With these questions uppermost in mind, we undertook a visit to the Soviet Union in June 1990. In addition to the perspective afforded by meeting some of the intellectuals, journalists, academicians, political leaders and activists who compose Moscow's political class, we especially wanted to see what impact the process of political and economic change was having on workers, and what role they were playing in the process, as this might be revealed in terms of the activities of the party, the trade unions, the informal workers committees and the relation between managers and workers in the enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Moscow News Digital Archive
    Moscow News Digital Archive - Curriculum Guide - www.eastview.com Moscow News Digital Archive - Curriculum Guide - a core newspaper of east view global press archivetm June 13, 2018 East View Information Services Moscow News Digital Archive - Curriculum Guide - www.eastview.com Introduction This guide is intended to serve as reference for instructors who wish to integrate Moscow News articles as primary source reading within their courses. Instructors are encouraged to leverage the material as they see fit including integrating within syllabi, assigning as reading for class preparation or use in online courses as background for discussion posts. The articles identified in this guide are also a valuable resource for guided research. This is a complimentary resource; however, the linked URLs will only work with accounts authenticated to the subscribing institution. Further distribution is not permitted. About the Moscow News Moscow News (pub. 1930-2014) was the oldest English-language newspaper in Russia and, arguably, the newspaper with the longest democratic history. From a mouthpiece of the Communist party to an influential advocate for social and political change, the pages of Moscow News reflect the shifting ideological, political, social and economic currents that have swept through the Soviet Union and Russia in the last century. In its early years, Moscow News largely served as yet another weapon in the Soviet Union’s propaganda arsenal. However, starting in the 1980s, Moscow News flourished into an influential independent resource and a strong proponent of Gorbachev’s policies of glasnost and perestroika. The newspaper became a platform for advocates of radical reform, as well as a forum for discussing traditionally taboo subjects, such as the repressions and show trials of the 1930s, the Katyn massacre of Polish officers by Soviets, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia | Freedom House
    Russia | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/country/russia/freedom-world/2020 D1 0-4 pts Are there free and independent media? 0 4 Although the constitution provides for freedom of speech, vague laws on extremism grant the authorities great discretion to crack down on any speech, organization, or activity that lacks official support. The government controls, directly or through state- owned companies and friendly business magnates, all of the national television networks and many radio and print outlets, as well as most of the media advertising market. A handful of independent outlets still operate, most of them online and some headquartered abroad. Television remains the most popular source of news, but its influence is declining, particularly among young people who rely more on social networks. Attacks, arrests, office raids, and threats against journalists are common. In late July 2019, five journalists covering preelection protests in Moscow were physically attacked by police. By August, at least 14 journalists covering the protests were detained, in one case even after their accreditation was found. Authorities actively targeted journalists outside of Moscow throughout 2019. In early June, Meduza journalist Ivan Golunov was arrested for alleged drug possession. Colleagues and activists successfully campaigned for his release and the dismissal of charges later that month. Igor Rudnikov, editor in chief of Kaliningrad based newspaper Novye Kolesa, spent a year and a half in pretrial detention on allegations that he extracted a bribe, which he denied. Ultimately, the court reduced the charge and freed him on the basis of time served in mid-June. Novye Kolesa reported on the extravagant lifestyle of General Viktor Ledenev, an intelligence veteran and senior law enforcement official.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by Kadri Ollino Public Lecture by Lev Ponomaryov in The
    Compiled by Kadri Ollino Public Lecture by Lev Ponomaryov in the “Russian Voices” lecture series in Tallinn, December 1, 2010 Developments in Current Russia While the Russian authorities have instated several restrictions for Lev Ponomaryov over recent years, many countries abroad have recognized his work in Russia. Mr. Ponomaryov’s lecture drew a significant crowd also in Estonia as the developments of Estonia’s neighbor in the east fascinate many people. In Russia it has become routine to use detainment as administrative punishment and Ponomaryov is no exception to that rule, he himself has experienced this form of reprimand on several occasions. According to Ponomaryov, the prequel to the current circumstances surrounding human rights in Russia goes back to the beginning of 1990s. When in the rest of Europe the democratic bourgeois revolutions started with France already 200 years ago, it reached Russia only in 1990-91. The current system collapsed and after 70 years of totalitarian regime, for the first time people felt free. Many went into business, some entered politics, but many also used their freedom to live a life of crime. Soon enough Special Forces in Russia started to expand and abuse their power as there was no democratic institution to counterbalance them. Since the terrorist attacks in 2001 in democratic countries in Europe and the US Special Forces have taken upon themselves several liberties, but there are also state institutions in place that monitor their actions so that power is not only in the hands of one group. In Russia special forces have operated without any limitations already for the past 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    A Column By Len Johnson TABLE OF CONTENTS TOM KELLY................................................................................................5 A RELAY BIG SHOW ..................................................................................8 IS THIS THE COMMONWEALTH GAMES FINEST MOMENT? .................11 HALF A GLASS TO FILL ..........................................................................14 TOMMY A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS ........................................................17 NO LIGHTNING BOLT, JUST A WARM SURPRISE ................................. 20 A BEAUTIFUL SET OF NUMBERS ...........................................................23 CLASSIC DISTANCE CONTESTS FOR GLASGOW ...................................26 RISELEY FINALLY GETS HIS RECORD ...................................................29 TRIALS AND VERDICTS ..........................................................................32 KIRANI JAMES FIRST FOR GRENADA ....................................................35 DEEK STILL WEARS AN INDELIBLE STAMP ..........................................38 MICHAEL, ELOISE DO IT THEIR WAY .................................................... 40 20 SECONDS OF BOLT BEATS 20 MINUTES SUNSHINE ........................43 ROWE EQUAL TO DOUBELL, NOT DOUBELL’S EQUAL ..........................46 MOROCCO BOUND ..................................................................................49 ASBEL KIPROP ........................................................................................52 JENNY SIMPSON .....................................................................................55
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 European Championships Statistics – Men's 100M
    2012 European Championships Statistics – Men’s 100m by K Ken Nakamura All time performance list at the European Championships Performance Performer Time Wind Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 9.99 1.3 Francis Obikwelu POR 1 Göteborg 20 06 2 2 10.04 0.3 Darren Campbell GBR 1 Budapest 1998 3 10.06 -0.3 Francis Obikwelu 1 München 2002 3 3 10.06 -1.2 Christophe Lemaitre FRA 1sf1 Barcelona 2010 5 4 10.08 0.7 Linford Christie GBR 1qf1 Helsinki 1994 6 10.09 0.3 Linford Christie 1sf1 Sp lit 1990 7 5 10.10 0.3 Dwain Chambers GBR 2 Budapest 1998 7 5 10.10 1.3 Andrey Yepishin RUS 2 Göteborg 2006 7 10.10 -0.1 Dwain Chambers 1sf2 Barcelona 2010 10 10.11 0.5 Darren Campbell 1sf2 Budapest 1998 10 10.11 -1.0 Christophe Lemaitre 1 Barce lona 2010 12 10.12 0.1 Francis Obikwelu 1sf2 München 2002 12 10.12 1.5 Andrey Yepishin 1sf1 Göteborg 2006 14 10.14 -0.5 Linford Christie 1 Helsinki 1994 14 7 10.14 1.5 Ronald Pognon FRA 2sf1 Göteborg 2006 14 7 10.14 1.3 Matic Osovnikar SLO 3 Gö teborg 2006 17 10.15 -0.1 Linford Christie 1 Stuttgart 1986 17 10.15 0.3 Dwain Chambers 1sf1 Budapest 1998 17 10.15 -0.3 Darren Campbell 2 München 2002 20 9 10.16 1.5 Steffen Bringmann GDR 1sf1 Stuttgart 1986 20 10.16 1.3 Ronald Pognon 4 Göteb org 2006 20 9 10.16 1.3 Mark Lewis -Francis GBR 5 Göteborg 2006 20 9 10.16 -0.1 Jaysuma Saidy Ndure NOR 2sf2 Barcelona 2010 24 12 10.17 0.3 Haralabos Papadias GRE 3 Budapest 1998 24 12 10.17 -1.2 Emanuele Di Gregorio IA 2sf1 Barcelona 2010 26 14 10.18 1.5 Bruno Marie -Rose FRA 2sf1 Stuttgart 1986 26 10.18 -1.0 Mark Lewis Francis 2 Barcelona 2010
    [Show full text]