December 3, 2020 the Canada Energy Regulator Suite 210, 517

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

December 3, 2020 the Canada Energy Regulator Suite 210, 517 Nancy Kleer [email protected] T: 416.981.9336 F: 416.981.9350 73353 December 3, 2020 The Canada Energy Regulator Suite 210, 517 Tenth Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2R 0A8 Mr. Stéphane Talbot Director – Planning Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie 2, Complexe Desjardins East Tower, 9th floor C.P. 10000, succ. Desjardins Montréal, QC H5B 1H7 [email protected] The Honourable Seamus O’Regan Minister of Natural Resources Natural Resources Canada 580 Booth Street, 21st Floor Ottawa, ON K1A 0E4 [email protected] Dear Sirs/Mesdames: Re: Comments of Innu Nation Inc. on Hydro-Québec TransÉnergie Application for the Appalaches-Maine Interconnection Power Line Project, Application No. C01914 I write on behalf of the Innu Nation of Labrador (“Innu Nation”) to comment on Hydro- Québec’s application for a permit (the “Permit”) to build the Appalaches-Maine Interconnection Power Line Project (the “Project”). The Project is a proposed direct current transmission line approximately 103 kilometers long between the Appalaches substation in the municipality of Saint-Adrien-d’Irlande, and a crossing point on the Canada-US border in the municipality of Frontenac. The Project will permit Hydro-Québec to further profit from the Churchill Falls Generating Station (“CFGS”) by selling electricity generated at that facility into U.S. markets. 250 UNIVERSITY AVE., 8TH FLOOR, TORONTO, ON, M5H 3 E 5 T E L : 4 1 6 - 9 8 1 - 9 3 3 0 F A X : 4 1 6 - 981- 9 3 5 0 WWW.OKTLAW.COM Page 2 CFGS was built, without their consent, on the Innu of Labrador’s traditional territory. This territory is coextensive with the Innu of Labrador’s land claim area that was accepted for negotiation by Canada, and the Innu of Labrador have never given up their aboriginal rights and title to it. CFGS has caused untold and ongoing damage to the Innu of Labrador’s territory and way of life. Hydro-Québec – which played a critical role in the design and construction of the CFGS and now takes most of the electricity generated by that facility – has made no effort to compensate the Innu for those damages. It has not even taken the symbolic step of acknowledging CFGS’ impacts on the Innu. Instead, while the Innu continue to live every day with the legacy of environmental degradation and damage caused by CFGS, Hydro-Québec continues to reap extraordinary profits from that project (estimated at up to $80 billion to date). Hydro-Québec’s actions have breached several of the Innu people’s rights under the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. These include their right to their traditional territory and the resources derived from it. They also include their right to not have development proceed on their traditional territory without first providing their free, prior, and informed consent to that development. And they include their right to compensation for these and other past and ongoing breaches of their rights. In the context of Hydro-Québec’s application for the Permit, the Innu Nation submits that it would not be in the public interest to allow the Project to proceed while these breaches of UNDRIP remain unaddressed. Similarly, it would not be in the public interest to permit Hydro- Québec to develop new mechanisms to profit from conduct that clearly breaches several the Innu’s rights under UNDRIP. Accordingly, the Innu Nation respectfully request that: a) the Commission exercise its broad public interest jurisdiction in s. 32(1) of the Canadian Energy Regulator Act to impose a condition in the Permit that states: “Prior to the start of construction, Hydro-Québec must submit to the Commission documentation of permission to use Innu Territory for the CFGS that includes the signature of a duly authorized representative of the Innu Nation;” or b) in the alternative, if the Commission is unprepared to do so, that the Governor in Council designate the Project under s. 258(1)(a) of the Canadian Energy Regulator Act as a project requiring a certificate; and c) the Commission hold a public hearing to determine whether the Project is and will be required by the present and future public convenience and necessity in accordance with the factors set out in s. 262(2) of the Canadian Energy Regulator Act. The Commission and the Governor in Council have the jurisdiction to grant these remedies. The Innu respectfully submit that these are appropriate circumstances in which to grant them. The Innu of Labrador, their territory, and Innu Nation The Innu of Labrador have a population of approximately 3,200 who now reside primarily in two separate communities: the reserves set aside for their people at Natuashish and 250 UNIVERSITY AVE., 8TH FLOOR, TORONTO, ON, M5H 3 E 5 T E L : 4 1 6 - 9 8 1 - 9 3 3 0 F A X : 4 1 6 - 981- 9 3 5 0 WWW.OKTLAW.COM Page 3 Sheshatshiu. Both are First Nations having the capacity of Bands under the Indian Act. The Innu are an Aboriginal people within the meaning of s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and an Indigenous people within the meaning of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The Innu have, since time immemorial, lived in their territory, which they call “Nitassinan” (which means “Our Land” in Innu-aimun). The Innu are hunters who have travelled over these lands in family groups, using timeworn travelling routes to hunt, fish, gather and trade. Travelling was and is central to the Innu identity, since through travel they maintained their social and ceremonial connections with other Innu, neighbouring peoples, and the land. Innu gatherings at central locations for trade and cultural events, including near Churchill Falls, have been integral to their way of life. Nitassinan includes much of present-day Labrador and parts of eastern Quebec. Nitassinan is where the Innu hunt and trap wildlife, fish, and collect plants and other natural resources, for food, clothing, shelter, medicine, tools, trade, and ceremonial purposes. The Innu use its rivers, streams and water bodies for transportation, food, and cultural purposes. They use specific sites in Nitassinan to exercise spiritual and cultural practices. And they transmit traditional knowledge about the history, uses and values of Nitassinan, including the animals, flora, lands, resources, and the Innu’s way of life in it and as part of it, to subsequent generations of Innu. The Innu were able to resist the forces of colonization and maintain their way of life until resource developers started looking in earnest to exploit their lands starting in the 1950s, at which point they were forced into settled communities by the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. The Innu now reside primarily in two communities: Sheshatshiu and Natuashish. In the 1980s Canada accepted their land claim for negotiation under Canada’s comprehensive land claims policy, which includes the area damaged by the CFGS. Formal negotiations began in the 1990s. Newfoundland and Labrador and Canada have recognized and acknowledged that the Innu of Labrador have a legitimate and unresolved Aboriginal title and Aboriginal rights claim to a significant area of Labrador (the area the Innu call Nitassinan). Those parties are participating in negotiations to resolve this outstanding land claim. On November 18, 2011, they signed an Agreement-in-Principle with Canada and the Province with respect to the Innu claim to lands in Labrador, confirming the intention of the parties to enter into a final agreement to settle the land claim. Negotiations are ongoing. Innu Nation Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of Newfoundland and Labrador to represent the rights and interests of the Innu. Innu Nation Inc. represents the Innu, including in land claim and self-government negotiations with Canada and Newfoundland and Labrador. Its mandate is to speak as one voice to protect the interests of the Innu people in relation to their land. 250 UNIVERSITY AVE., 8TH FLOOR, TORONTO, ON, M5H 3 E 5 T E L : 4 1 6 - 9 8 1 - 9 3 3 0 F A X : 4 1 6 - 981- 9 3 5 0 WWW.OKTLAW.COM Page 4 Churchill Falls Generating Station CFGS is a massive hydro-electric project located in western Labrador. CFGS is owned and operated by Churchill Fall (Labrador) Corporation (“CF(L)Co”). Nalcor Energy – Newfoundland and Labrador’s provincially owned electricity utility – and Hydro-Quebec are CF(L)Co’s sole shareholders. Nalcor is the majority shareholder. The main works that comprise the CFGS include a series of dikes and control structures along a 64 kilometer stretch of waterways in the watershed of Mishtashipu, a river that drains an area of over 90,000 kilometers, which comprises a large portion of Nitassinan. The Innu call Mishtashipu the “Great River.” It is also known as the “Churchill River.” The dikes and control structures on Mishtashipu result in the diversion or drainage of an area of approximately 72,000 square kilometers. The main works of CFGS also include a reservoir called the “Smallwood Reservoir”, which covers an area of over 6,500 square kilometers to contain the water diverted by the dikes, and a power generation station that uses water from the Smallwood reservoir and another reservoir (the Ossokamanuan Reservoir) to generate electricity. The massive scale of the Smallwood Reservoir is shown on this map: Before the reservoir was created by flooding, this area was a gathering place for the Innu from across the Québec-Labrador Peninsula. It was known to the Innu as the Meshikamau area, named for Lake Meshikamau. The area was rich in fish and wildlife and was on the migration 250 UNIVERSITY AVE., 8TH FLOOR, TORONTO, ON, M5H 3 E 5 T E L : 4 1 6 - 9 8 1 - 9 3 3 0 F A X : 4 1 6 - 981- 9 3 5 0 WWW.OKTLAW.COM Page 5 path of two herds of caribou, which are integral to the Innu diet and cultural and spiritual identity.
Recommended publications
  • North American Megadam Resistance Alliance
    North American Megadam Resistance Alliance May 18, 2020 Christopher Lawrence U.S. Department of Energy Management and Program Analyst Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance Office of Electricity Christopher.Lawrence.hq.doe.gov Re: Comments on DOE Docket No. PP-362-1: Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc. and CHPE, LLC: Application to Rescind Presidential Permit and Application for Presidential Permit Dear Mr. Lawrence, The Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter and North American Megadam Resistance Alliance submit these comments on the above-referenced application of Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc. (CHPEI) and CHPE, LLC (together, the Applicants) to transfer to CHPE, LLC ownership of the facilities owned by CHPEI and authorized for cross-border electric power transmission via a high voltage direct current line (the Project) by Presidential Permit No. PP- 362, dated October 6, 2014 (PP-362 or the Permit) .1 The Project is being developed by TDI, a Blackstone portfolio company. www.transmissiondevelopers.com Blackstone is a private investment firm with about $500 billion under management. www.blackstone.com The Sierra Club Atlantic Chapter, headquartered Albany New York, is responsible for the Sierra Club’s membership and activities in New York State and works on a variety of environmental issues. The Sierra Club is a national environmental organization founded in 1892. 1 On April 6, 2020, the Applicants requested that the Department of Energy (DOE) amend, or in the alternative, rescind and reissue PP-362 to enable the transfer of the Permit from CHPEI to its affiliate CHPE, LLC (the Application). On April 16, 2020, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Notice of “Application to Rescind Presidential Permit; Application for Presidential Permit; Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Innu-Aimun Legal Terms Kaueueshtakanit Aimuna
    INNU-AIMUN LEGAL TERMS (criminal law) KAUEUESHTAKANIT AIMUNA Sheshatshiu Dialect FIRST EDITION, 2007 www.innu-aimun.ca Innu-aimun Legal Terms (Criminal Law) Kaueueshtakanit innu-aimuna Sheshatshiu Dialect Editors / Ka aiatashtaht mashinaikannu Marguerite MacKenzie Kristen O’Keefe Innu collaborators / Innuat ka uauitshiaushiht Anniette Bartmann Mary Pia Benuen George Gregoire Thomas Michel Anne Rich Audrey Snow Francesca Snow Elizabeth Williams Legal collaborators / Kaimishiht ka uitshi-atussemaht Garrett O’Brien Jason Edwards DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GOVERNMENT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR St. John’s, Canada Published by: Department of Justice Government of Newfoundland and Labrador St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada First edition, 2007 Printed in Canada ISBN 978-1-55146-328-5 Information contained in this document is available for personal and public non-commercial use and may be reproduced, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the Department of Justice, Newfoundland and Labrador. We ask only that: 1. users exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the material reproduced; 2. the Department of Justice, Newfoundland and Labrador be identified as the source department; 3. the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the materials reproduced, nor as having been made in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Department of Justice, Newfoundland and Labrador. Cover design by Andrea Jackson Printing Services by Memorial University of Newfoundland Foreword Access to justice is a cornerstone in our justice system. But it is important to remember that access has a broad meaning and it means much more than physical facilities. One of the key considerations in delivering justice services in Inuit and Innu communities is improving access through the use of appropriate language services.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Study of the George River Watershed (Nunavik, Québec) Impacts of Climate and Societal Changes
    Environmental study of the George River watershed (Nunavik, Québec) Impacts of climate and societal changes Dedieu J.P. 1*, Franssen J. 2, Monfette M. 2, Herrmann T.M. 2, MacMillan G.A. 3, Grant E. 3, Amyot M. 3, Lévesque E. 4, Housset J. 4, Gérin-Lajoie J. 4, Dubois G. 4, Bayle A. 5, Snowball H. 6 (Photo M. Monfette, 2017) 1 IGE-CNRS / Université Grenoble-Alpes, France 4 Dept Environmental Science – Université du Québec à Trois Rivières, Québec, Canada 2 Dept Geography – Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada 5 LECA-CNRS / Université Grenoble Alpes, France 3 Dept Biological Sciences – Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada 6 The Northern village of Kangiqsualujjuaq, Québec, Canada International Symposium of LabEx DRIIHM Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility on Human-Environment Interactions - ANR-11-LABX-0010 October 7th-9th, 2019 – ENS Lyon (France) OUTLINE Background Scientific application and results • A climate change and societal evolution context • Water quality and chemistry (contaminants) • Research in Nunavik digest • Ecological study (Arctic greening) • Interactive mapping (CBEM) Motivation Conclusions and outlook • OHMI-Nunavik and Imalirijiit project design • Take home message International Symposium of LabEx DRIIHM 2 Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility on Human-Environment Interactions - ANR-11-LABX-0010 October 7th-9th, 2019 – ENS Lyon (France) Background Climate trends • A worrying context for Arctic and Subarctic regions : Since 2000, Arctic surface air T° increased at more than double the global average. Winter (January-March) near-surface temperature positive anomalies of +6°C (relative to 1981-2010) recorded in the central Arctic during both 2016 and 2018. Tomorrow (2050): +4-7°C mean annual year T° in the Arctic Winter pan-Canadian temperatures, long-term-trend 1948-2016 Source : Summary Report, Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC), IPCC, Sept 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Ore Company of Canada New Explosives Facility, Labrador City
    IRON ORE COMPANY OF CANADA NEW EXPLOSIVES FACILITY, LABRADOR CITY Environmental Assessment Registration Pursuant to the Newfoundland & Labrador Environmental Protection Act (Part X) Submitted by: Iron Ore Company of Canada 2 Avalon Drive Labrador City, Newfoundland & Labrador A2V 2Y6 Canada Prepared with the assistance of: GEMTEC Consulting Engineers and Scientists Limited 10 Maverick Place Paradise, NL A1L 0J1 Canada May 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 1.1 Proponent Information ...............................................................................................3 1.2 Rationale for the Undertaking .................................................................................... 5 1.3 Environmental Assessment Process and Requirements ............................................ 7 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................8 2.1 Geographic Location ..................................................................................................8 2.2 Land Tenure ............................................................................................................ 10 2.3 Alternatives to the Project ........................................................................................ 10 2.4 Project Components ................................................................................................ 10 2.4.1 Demolition and
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Rectoverso
    HOWSE MINERALS LIMITED HOWSE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT – (APRIL 2016) - SUBMITTED TO THE CEAA 11 LITERATURE CITED AND PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS Personal Communications André, D., Environmental Coordinator, MLJ, September 24 2014 Bouchard, J., Sécurité du Québec Director, Schefferville, September 26 2014 Cloutier, P., physician in NNK, NIMLJ and Schefferville, September 24 2014 Coggan, C. Atmacinta, Economy and Employment – NNK, 2013 and 2014 (for validation) Corbeil, G., NNK Public Works, October 28 2014 Cordova, O., TSH Director, November 3 2014 Côté, S.D., Localization of George River Caribou Herd Radio-Collared Individuals, Map dating from 2014- 12-08 from Caribou Ungava Einish, L., Centre de la petite enfance Uatikuss, September 23 2015 Elders, NNK, September 26 2014 Elders, NIMLJ, September 25 2014 Fortin, C., Caribou data, December 15 2014 and January 22 2014 Gaudreault, D., Nurse at the CLSC Naskapi, September 25 2014 Guanish, G., NNK Environmental Coordinator, September 22 2014 ITUM, Louis (Sylvestre) Mackenzie family trapline holder, 207 ITUM, Jean-Marie Mackenzie family, trapline holder, 211 Jean-Hairet, T., Nurse at the dispensary of Matimekush, personal communication, September 26 2014 Jean-Pierre, D., School Principal, MLJ, September 24 2014 Joncas, P., Administrator, Schefferville, September 22 2014 Lalonde, D., AECOM Project Manager, Environment, Montreal, November 10 2015 Lévesque, S., Non-Aboriginal harvester, Schefferville, September 25 2014 Lavoie, V., Director, Société de développement économique montagnaise, November 3 2014 Mackenzie, M., Chief, ITUM, November 3 2014 MacKenzie, R., Chief, Matimekush Lac-John, September 23 and 24 2014 Malec, M., ITUM Police Force, November 5 2014 Martin, D., Naskapi Police Force Chief, September 25 2014 Michel, A.
    [Show full text]
  • IR# JRP.166 Downstream Effects Below Muskrat Falls INFORMATION REQUESTS RESPONSES| LOWER CHURCHILL HYDROELECTRIC GENERATION PROJECT
    IR# JRP.166 Downstream Effects below Muskrat Falls INFORMATION REQUESTS RESPONSES| LOWER CHURCHILL HYDROELECTRIC GENERATION PROJECT Requesting Organization – Joint Review Panel Information Request No.: JRP.166 Subject – Downstream Effects below Muskrat Falls References: EIS Guidelines, Section 4.5.1 (Environmental Effects General) Related Comments / Information Requests: IR # JRP.43, IR # JRP.149, IR # JRP.153 Information Requested: a. Nalcor hydrology studies indicate the Churchill River exerts a strong influence on the estuarine regime in Goose Bay and concerns have been expressed by a number of participants regarding the downstream effects of the Project. Explain the specific criteria used in Nalcor's response to Information Request (IR) JRP.43 to predict no measurable effect on downstream total phosphorus and total suspended solids, transport distances, fish productivity, salinity, velocity and thermal profiles from Goose Bay to Lake Melville, ice dynamics, ringed and harbour seal use of Lake Melville, bank stability, fish habitat utilization and fish migration. Identify whether and how these predictions apply to the period of reservoir impoundment, and the post‐impoundment transitional period before water quality stabilizes. Response: The influence of the lower Churchill River freshwater hydrology on Goose Bay and Lake Melville is recognized by Nalcor Energy (Nalcor) and has been central to limiting downstream effects to the extent possible. The minimal change in flow regime below Muskrat Falls as a result of the Project as described in IR# JRP.43, IR# JRP.149 and IR# JRP.153 mitigates most potential effects in terms of changes in salinity, circulation/current influenced by freshwater flows of the Churchill River, shoreline erosion (due to changes in water levels), tributary access, fish movements, habitat utilization and transportation distances.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICLE Having Covered Over 8700 Km Including 1600 Km on Foot, Over 4700 Km in Canoe, 800 Km by Dog Team and 1600 Km by Steam- Er
    GEOSCIENCE CANADA Volume 45 2018 43 ARTICLE having covered over 8700 km including 1600 km on foot, over 4700 km in canoe, 800 km by dog team and 1600 km by steam- er. The report from the expedition provides a compendium on the natural history of the region as well as the first geological maps. In terms of economic and scientific results, the greatest was documentation of the vast iron ore deposits of western Labrador; a world-class mining district that has been produc- ing for sixty-three years since 1954. Low’s account also pro- vides details on the essence of such an epic journey, which stands as a classic in the annals of Canadian geological survey- ing. RÉSUMÉ En 1893–1894, Albert Peter Low de la Commission géologique du Canada, accompagné du D.I.V. Eaton et quatre assistants autochtones ont exploré la péninsule du Labrador, Albert Peter Low in Labrador– alors perçue comme l'une des dernières grandes étendues A Tale of Iron and Irony sauvages inexplorées d’Amérique du Nord. L’équipe a quitté le Lake St. John (aujourd'hui le lac Saint-Jean) le 17 juin 1893, a traversé la bordure nord-est du continent nord-américain en Derek H.C. Wilton canoë, et est arrivé à Fort Chimo (aujourd'hui Kuujjuaq) le 27 août 1893. À l'automne de 1893, ils ont quitté Fort Chimo à Department of Earth Sciences bord d'un vapeur pour Rigolet, sur la côte du Labrador, et le Memorial University of Newfoundland poste de la Compagnie de la Baie d'Hudson sur la rivière St.
    [Show full text]
  • Death and Life for Inuit and Innu
    skin for skin Narrating Native Histories Series editors: K. Tsianina Lomawaima Alcida Rita Ramos Florencia E. Mallon Joanne Rappaport Editorial Advisory Board: Denise Y. Arnold Noenoe K. Silva Charles R. Hale David Wilkins Roberta Hill Juan de Dios Yapita Narrating Native Histories aims to foster a rethinking of the ethical, methodological, and conceptual frameworks within which we locate our work on Native histories and cultures. We seek to create a space for effective and ongoing conversations between North and South, Natives and non- Natives, academics and activists, throughout the Americas and the Pacific region. This series encourages analyses that contribute to an understanding of Native peoples’ relationships with nation- states, including histo- ries of expropriation and exclusion as well as projects for autonomy and sovereignty. We encourage collaborative work that recognizes Native intellectuals, cultural inter- preters, and alternative knowledge producers, as well as projects that question the relationship between orality and literacy. skin for skin DEATH AND LIFE FOR INUIT AND INNU GERALD M. SIDER Duke University Press Durham and London 2014 © 2014 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ∞ Designed by Heather Hensley Typeset in Arno Pro by Copperline Book Services, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Sider, Gerald M. Skin for skin : death and life for Inuit and Innu / Gerald M. Sider. pages cm—(Narrating Native histories) Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978- 0- 8223- 5521- 2 (cloth : alk. paper) isbn 978- 0- 8223- 5536- 6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Naskapi Indians—Newfoundland and Labrador—Labrador— Social conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Archives in Rupert's Land by WILMA MACDONALD
    Anglican Archives in Rupert's Land by WILMA MACDONALD Until 1870 the vast area which is now northern Quebec and Ontario, the prairies, Northwest Territories, Yukon, and portions of British Columbia was known as Rupert's Land. Prince Rupert, with sixteen associates, who were incorporated by Letters Patent as the Honourable the Hudson's Bay Company, was granted this vast territory in 1670 by King Charles 11. The new trading company acquired a region extending over 2,700,000 square miles. To protect its lucrative and increasing fur trade, the company successfully resisted attempts to colonize the territory. No effort was made to minister to the few Christian people in the widely scattered forts of the Hudson's Bay Company or to evangelize the native peoples until the early nineteenth century. In 1820, some six years after the tenacious Orkney Islanders established an agricultural settlement on the banks of the Red River, guided there by the Earl of Selkirk, the company sent out an Anglican chaplain, the Reverend John West (1778-1846). Although West was appointed to minister to the company's officers and servants, he also looked after the needs of the small Scottish colony and took great interest in the Indians. He established a school in the Red River settlement on a lot of land set apart for church purposes by thecompany (on which the Cathedral Church of St. John now stands in Winnipeg). West's efforts laid the foundations for missionary work and also marked the beginning of formal education in Manitoba. The small school he began in 1820 was followed by the Red River Academy, founded by John Macallurn and revived by Bishop David Anderson.
    [Show full text]
  • P-00352 Page 1
    CIMFP Exhibit P-00352 Page 1 Paper of Grand Riverkeeper Labrador, Inc. and Labrador Land Protectors for the Commission of Inquiry Respecting the Muskrat Falls Project October 1st, 2018 Muskrat Falls, Labrador 2014 "many have touched these rocks and felt its power, when the dam is finished, it will be felt no more" – Denise Cole CIMFP Exhibit P-00352 Page 2 (PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) CIMFP Exhibit P-00352 Page 3 Commissioner Justice Richard LeBlanc Beothuk Building, Suite 502, 20 Crosbie Place St. John’s, NL A1B 3Y8 October 1st, 2018 Dear Commissioner LeBlanc, RE: Paper for the Commission of Inquiry Respecting the Muskrat Falls Project We enclose the paper of Grand Riverkeeper prepared pursuant to the request of the Commissioner by his letter of May 20, 2018 with respect to the pre-sanction phase of the Muskrat Falls Project. The request set out the scope as follows: We are interested in having GRL/LLP prepare a paper describing its involvement with the Muskrat Falls Project pre-sanction. Specifically, we would like the paper to: • Describe GRL/LLP involvement with the Project prior to its sanction on December 17, 2012. This would include, without limitation, their involvement in the Joint Review Panel process and any involvement they had with Government or Nalcor officials. • Describe the key issues that GRL/LLP raised in relation to the Project prior to sanction. • Describe Nalcor’s and/or the Government’s response to GRL/LLP’s efforts We have endeavoured to include as much information as possible in relation to key issues raised regarding the project prior to December 17, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Innu of Labrador Contemporary Land Use Study (Armitage 2010)
    APPENDIX A Innu of Labrador Contemporary Land Use Study (Armitage 2010) Innu of Labrador Contemporary Land Use Study 29 October 2010 By Peter Armitage (Wolverine & Associates Inc.) Report to Innu Nation Sheshatshiu and Natuashish Nitassinan (Labrador) © Copyright 2010 Innu Nation This report is the property of Innu Nation. This report, extracts of this report, and/or original information from this report may not be used, reproduced or disseminated without the prior permission of Innu Nation. Prior permission has been granted by Innu Nation exclusively to Nalcor Energy to submit this report to the Joint Review Panel for the environmental assessment of the Lower Churchill Hydroelectric Generation Project, to include this report in the Environmental Impact Statement/Comprehensive Study and associated submissions in relation to the Labrador-Island Transmission Link Project, and to use this report in any environmental or regulatory proceedings related to these two proposed projects, or for the environmental assessment or regulatory proceedings of any other proposed generation or transmission developments related to these two proposed projects within the Study Area described in this report. 1 Executive Summary This report presents the results of research to document Labrador Innu land use in a large portion of southern Labrador that includes the proposed Lower Churchill Hydroelectric Generation Project and Labrador-Island Transmission Link Project with a focus on the contemporary (and especially, post-1990) period. The data and analysis presented here are to be used in the planning and environmental assessments of these projects. The study area for the research is bounded by the Trans Labrador Highway between Goose Bay, Churchill Falls and Wabush, the north shore of Lake Melville as far as Sebaskachu Bay, the headwaters of the Eagle River in the Mealy Mountains area, the Straits area of southern Labrador, and the southern Labrador-Quebec border.
    [Show full text]
  • 249 the Sheshatshiu Sociolinguistic Variability
    249 THE SHESHATSHIU SOCIOLINGUISTIC VARIABILITY PROJECT: A PRELIMINARY REPORT Marguerite MacKenzie and Sandra Clarke Memorial University of Newfoundland Introduction This paper constitutes a preliminary report on the investigation of linguistic variation among the speakers of a dialect of Montagnais spo­ ken at Sheshatshiu, Labrador. The project was undertaken in the fall of 1981 and fieldwork was carried out early in 1982. The purpose of the project is, first, to provide detailed documentation on the linguis­ tic variation known to exist among the speakers of Montagnais in this village and, second, to try to correlate any patterns of variation with non-linguistic factors. This study is of particular interest because the community of Sheshatshiu is highly different from the urban, socially stratified communities for which the investigative techniques common to modern sociolinguistic research have been developed. The people of Sheshatshiu are semi-nomadic hunters who have traditionally lived in small family groups. They are now resident for a good portion of the year in a single location, the community of Sheshatshiu, which is clearly non-industrial, has virtually no economic base, and exists by virtue of the fact that in former years it was a summer gathering place for families who had spent the entire winter hunting and trapping in the bush. At the moment, the largest employers in the community are the school and the band administration. The Montagnais dialect spoken today by residents of Sheshatshiu is noteworthy for its degree of intracommunity variability. Clearly, in such an apparently non-economically stratified society, the variable of informant socio-economic status could hardly be expected to aid in accounting for this perceived linguistic variability.
    [Show full text]