Parasitoids of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from a Traditional Maize Crop in the Mexican State of Yucatan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parasitoids of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from a Traditional Maize Crop in the Mexican State of Yucatan Scientific Notes 759 PARASITOIDS OF FALL ARMYWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) FROM A TRADITIONAL MAIZE CROP IN THE MEXICAN STATE OF YUCATAN H. DELFÍN-GONZÁLEZ, M. BOJÓRQUEZ-ACEVEDO AND P. MANRIQUE-SAIDE Departamento de Zoología, CA Bioecología, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán Studies on the natural enemies of the fall army made by the authors, and voucher specimens are worm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) deposited at the Coleccion Entomologica Regional (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) have reported a great di- of the Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan. versity of associated parasitoids. Approximately Lespesia archippivora and E. plathypenae rep- 150 species of FAW parasitoids from 13 families resented the most abundant parasitoid species. have been recorded occurring in the Americas This is the first report of L. archippivora for the (Molina-Ochoa et al. 2003). Twenty-two species Mexican state of Yucatan. Based on our results, it have been reported for Mexico, and species compo- seems that species composition of FAW parasi- sition seems to vary throughout the country toids in this locality of Yucatan is composed of (Molina-Ochoa et al. 2004). In Northern states of widely-distributed species (Molina-Ochoa et al. Mexico parasitoids associated to FAW are entirely 2003). Lespesia archippivora is a gregarian facul- hymenopterans, whereas FAW parasitoid assem- tative endoparasitoid of several species of Lepi- blages in some Southern states, i.e., Tabasco, doptera (e.g., Arctiidae, Danaidae, Geometridae, Quintana Roo and Chiapas, include wasps and Lycaenidae, Noctuidae, Ninphalidae, Papilion- tachinid flies (Macháin et al. 1975; Zapata 1984; idae, Pieridae, Pyralidae, and Yponomeutidae) Cabrera & García 1985; Molina-Ochoa et al. 2001). (Arnaud 1978), including economically important Here we report for the first time parasitoids of genera of lepidopteran pests (e.g., Spodoptera, Tri- FAW from the Southern Mexican state of Yucatan. choplusia, and Heliothis). It is probably the most Direct FAW larval collections were performed common parasitoid of FAW in Central America within a traditional maize crop (Zea mays Lin- (Cave 1993), and distributed from Canada to naeus) located 9 km from the locality of Teya South Mexico (Benaway 1963). Archytas marm- Yucatan, from July 19th to Sep 27th 1999. All FAW oratus is a polyphagous solitary larval-pupal en- larvae detected on plants in 3 transects (composed doparasitoid of numerous species of Noctuidae, in- by 1 meter square quadrants) within a 2-hectares cluding many important pest species from the area were collected for 3 d continuously fortnightly genera Agrotis, Helicoverpa, Heliothis, Hyblaea, (totaling 5 surveys during the overall period). Col- Leucania, Mocis, Pseudaletia, and Spodoptera lections corresponded with the rainy season, and (Arnaud 1978; Ravlin & Stehr 1984; Maes 1989). started 3 weeks after maize seeding and ended It is distributed from U.S.A. throughout the Neo- when maize was ready for harvest. The maize crop tropics (Cave 1993). Winthemia hosts include in was part of a “milpa”, agro-system associating the Neartic region larvae of Noctuidae and some maize, bean, squash, chilli, and other crops, which Sphingidae and Geometridae (Guimarães 1972). was the main cropping system during the pre-His- We were unable to identify the Winthemia speci- panic period and still in use in some parts of Mex- mens collected, but tentatively propose our speci- ico. The milpa was surrounded by a patch of tropi- mens as Winthemia quadripustulata, according to cal deciduous dry-forest, and other maize crops. their morphological features. The only hymenop- FAW larvae collected were taken to the labora- teran species emerged, E. plathypenae, is a gre- tory, and individually maintained in rustical rear- garian ectoparasitoid of Lepidoptera larvae. ing cages. They were fed daily with tender leaves Known hosts include the genera Anticarsia, Heli- of maize until the eventual pupation and emer- coverpa, Leucania, Mocis, Pseudaletia, Pseudoplu- gence of the adult lepidopteran or the parasitoids. sia, Spodoptera and Trichoplusia (King & Saun- We calculated the percentage of parasitism = (To- ders 1984; El-Heneidy 1985; Cave 1992, 1993, tal FAW larvae positive for parasitoids/Total FAW 1995). It is widely distributed in America. larvae collected) × 100 (Pair et al. 1986). In Teya Yucatan, as observed in other Southern From 174 FAW larvae collected, 13.22% were Mexican states, FAW larvae-parasitoid assem- parasited with 4 species of parasitoids (12 were blage is composed by tachinid and hymenopter- parasited by dipterans and 11 by hymenopterans); ans; but flies seem to be dominant. Studies in the remaining larvae became moths. The parasi- Tabasco have reported 4 species of parasitoids, 3 toids species collected were Lespesia archippivora of them are dipterans Archytas and Spallanizia (Riley) (10 specimens), Archytas marmoratus (Tachinidae) (Zapata 1984). In Chiapas, tachinid (Townsend) (4 specimens), Winthemia sp (4 speci- flies species of Archytas, Lespesia, and Winthemia mens) (Diptera: Tachinidae), and Euplectrus plat- are reported as well as hymenopterans Rogas hypenae Howard (172 specimens) (Hymenoptera: (presumably Aleiodes) (Braconidae) and Euplec- Eulophidae). The taxonomic determination was trus (Eulophidae) (Ruíz 1985; Espinosa 1986). In 760 Florida Entomologist 90(4) December 2007 TABLE 1. PERCENTAGE OF PARASITISM FROM FAW LARVAL (n = 174) COLLECTED WITHIN A TRADITIONAL MAIZE CROP (JUN-SEP 1999) FROM THE LOCALITY OF TEYA, YUCATAN, MEXICO. Surveys 12345Average Lespesia archippivora — 15.38 — — 2.78 9.08 Archytas marmoratus 3.23 3.85 3.57 1.89 — 3.14 Winthemia sp. 9.68 ————9.68 Euplectrus plathypenae — 3.85 28.57 1.89 2.78 9.27 Total 12.90 23.08 32.14 3.77 5.56 Quintana Roo (Peninsula of Yucatan), Archytas Yucatan. Species found are Lespesia archippivora, sp, Lespesia archippivora (Tachinidae), Pris- Archytas marmoratus, Winthemia sp. (Diptera: tomerus spinator (Ichenumonidae) and Chelonus Tachinidae), and Euplectrus plathypenae (Hy- sp (Braconidae) have been reported representing menoptera: Eulophidae). 41% larval parasitism (Carrillo 1980). This contrasts with FAW larvae-parasitoids REFERENCES CITED assemblages reported from other regions of Mex- ico. Reports from Northern Mexican states (So- ARNAUD, P. H., JR. 1978. A Host-parasite Catalog of nora, Baja California, and Tamaulipas) and North American Tachinidae (Diptera). United States Colima, Michoacan, Sinaloa, Nayarit, and Jalisco Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publica- (among the Pacific coast), include exclusively hy- tion No. 1319. 860 pp. menopterans: Braconidae (Chelonus, Cotesia, and ASHLEY, T. R. 1986. Geographical distributions and Meteoros); Ichneumonidae (Campoletis, Ophion, parasitization levels for parasitoids of the fall army- and Pristomerus) and 1 species of Eulophidae, Eu- worm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Florida Entomologist 69: 516-524. plectrus platyhypenae (Macháin et al. 1975; Car- BENEWAY, D. F. 1963. A revision of the flies of the genus illo 1980; Pacheco 1985; Molina-Ochoa et al. Lespesia (Archaetoneura) in North America (Diptera: 2001). In Morelos, Central Mexico is also com- Tachinidae). Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 44: 627-686. posed by hymenopterans (Chelonus insularis CABRERA, R. J., AND F. GARCÍA. 1985. Parasitismo nat- (Braconidae), Pristomerus spinator and Campole- ural sobre gusano cogollero Spodoptera frugiperda tis sp (Ichneumonidae) (Cabrera & García 1985; (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) en el estado Salazar et al. 1987). In Veracruz (among the Gulf de Morelos. Sociedad Mexicana de. Entomologia, p. of Mexico coast), the only reported parasitoids of 54 En Resumenes XX Congreso Nacional de Ento- FAW are Trichogramma sp (Trichogrammatidae) mología. Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México. CARRILLO, H. 1980. Determinación del parasitismo nat- and Euplectrus sp (Eulophidae) (Carrillo 1980). ural en larvas de gusano cogollero, Spodoptera fru- After 5 surveys (Table 1), only 23/174 FAW lar- giperda (J. E. Smith) en Quintana Roo. Folia vae were positive for parasitoids (13.22% overall Entomol. Mexicana 45: 111-112. percentage of parasitism); twelve FAW larvae CAVE, R. D. 1992. Inventary of parasitic organisms of the contained dipteran parasitoids (6.9%) and eleven striped grass looper, Mocis latipes (Lepidoptera: Noc- FAW larvae had Euplectrus plathypenae (6.32%). tuidae) in Honduras. Florida Entomol. 75: 592-598. Individual low percentages of parasitism seem to CAVE, R. D. 1993. Parasitoides larvales y pupales de be a feature of Tachinidae-FAW larval popula- Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctu- tions (Ashley 1986), as observed in Teya; but the idae) en Centroamérica con una clave para las espe- cies encontradas en Honduras. Ceiba 34: 33-56. percentage of parasitism caused by E. plathype- CAVE, R. D. 1995. Manual para el Reconocimiento de nae was lower than others reported (i.e., Molina- Parasitoides de Plagas Agrícolas en América Cen- Ochoa et al. 2004). All the species emerging from tral. Zamorano Academic Press Honduras. 202 pp. FAW immatures are primary koinobionts, attack- EL-HENEIDY, A. H. 1985. Biological aspects on Euplec- ing larval stages and killing the host, as larvae or trus plathypenae How. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), pupae. According to our results, no single para- a larval parasitoid of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera sitoid species exerted significant mortality frugiperda J. Smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Ag- throughout a major portion of FAW
Recommended publications
  • Danaus Plexippus) in Milkweed Gardens and Conservation Areas
    Journal of Insect Conservation https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-0102-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Recruitment, survival, and parasitism of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in milkweed gardens and conservation areas Emily A. Geest1 · L. LaReesa Wolfenbarger1 · John P. McCarty1 Received: 10 July 2018 / Accepted: 24 October 2018 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) are suffering from declining populations and conservationists have encouraged planting milkweed gardens in urban and suburban landscapes to help offset habitat loss across the breeding range. The effectiveness of gardens as a conservation strategy depends on their ability to attract ovipositing adults and the survival of monarch larvae in these gardens. Larvae are susceptible to a variety of predators as well as to parasitism by a tachinid fly (Lespesia archippivora) and a protozoan parasite (Ophryocystis elektroscirrha) which cause lethal or sublethal effects, yet the severity of these risks in gardens is not well understood. We compared egg abundance and larval survival in traditional conservation areas to gardens that incorporated milkweed to attract monarchs. Additionally, we collected late instar larvae and reared them in the lab to compare parasitism rates between monarch gardens and conservation areas. Both gardens and conservations sites varied widely in recruitment and survival of monarchs and there were no significant differences between the garden and conservation sites. Tachinid fly parasitism ranged from 30% of larvae from conservation sites in 2016 to 55% of larvae from gardens in 2017, but did not differ between the two categories of sites. Parasitism byO. elektroscirrha was detected in fewer than 2% of larvae. The density of milkweed had no effect on the number of monarch eggs in conservation areas or gardens in either year.
    [Show full text]
  • £Arasites Associated with Lepidopterous Pests of Alfalfa in .Qklahoma
    £ARASITES ASSOCIATED WITH LEPIDOPTEROUS PESTS OF ALFALFA IN .QKLAHOMA By KATHLEEN MARY SENST I' Bachelor of Arts Wartburg College Waverly, Iowa 1974 Master of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1978 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1982 PARASITES ASSOCIATED WITH LEPIDOPTEROUS PESTS OF ALFALFA IN OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: . ~ \ . ii 1143730 j ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I w.isb. to expres.s. my deep appreciation to my major adviser, Dr. Ricb.ard Berberet, for hi:s willi.ngness. to advise and help, and for his friendsb.i.p duri.ng thi:s: s:tudy and preparation of this manuscript. Appreciation is. expressed to Ors. Ray Eikenbary, Jerry Young, Robert Burton, and John Caddel for serving as members of my graduate committee, and to Or. Ron McNeu for his help in analyzing the data. Thanks. are extended to Mary Hininger, Melinda Davis, Donna Ridge, Phoebe Courtney, and Debbie Lauchner for their assistance in the lab­ oratory, and to Doug Sander and Kevin Mussett for their assistance in the fi.el d. Special thanks goes to Ms. Anne Hunt for clerical review and typing of this manuscript. My most sincere appreciation is reserved for my husband, John (Soteres}, for his encouragement, understanding, and patience while I was completing this work. I share the credit for this work with my family, whose love and support have been a constant source of encourage­ ment in my life. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 II.
    [Show full text]
  • No Slide Title
    Tachinidae: The “other” parasitoids Diego Inclán University of Padova Outline • Briefly (re-) introduce parasitoids & the parasitoid lifestyle • Quick survey of dipteran parasitoids • Introduce you to tachinid flies • major groups • oviposition strategies • host associations • host range… • Discuss role of tachinids in biological control Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Life cycle of a parasitoid Alien (1979) Life cycle of a parasitoid Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Parasitoid does not kill the host kill its host Insects life cycles Life cycle of a parasitoid Some facts about parasitoids • Parasitoids are diverse (15-25% of all insect species) • Hosts of parasitoids = virtually all terrestrial insects • Parasitoids are among the dominant natural enemies of phytophagous insects (e.g., crop pests) • Offer model systems for understanding community structure, coevolution & evolutionary diversification Distribution/frequency of parasitoids among insect orders Primary groups of parasitoids Diptera (flies) ca. 20% of parasitoids Hymenoptera (wasps) ca. 70% of parasitoids Described Family Primary hosts Diptera parasitoid sp Sciomyzidae 200? Gastropods: (snails/slugs) Nemestrinidae 300 Orth.: Acrididae Bombyliidae 5000 primarily Hym., Col., Dip. Pipunculidae 1000 Hom.:Auchenorrycha Conopidae 800 Hym:Aculeata Lep., Orth., Hom., Col., Sarcophagidae 1250? Gastropoda + others Lep., Hym., Col., Hem., Tachinidae > 8500 Dip., + many others Pyrgotidae 350 Col:Scarabaeidae Acroceridae 500 Arach.:Aranea Hym., Dip., Col., Lep., Phoridae 400?? Isop.,Diplopoda
    [Show full text]
  • Monarch (Danaus Plexippus) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Monarch (Danaus plexippus) in Canada Monarch 2016 Recommended citation: Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016. Management Plan for the Monarch (Danaus plexippus) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. iv + 45 pp. For copies of the management plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: Monarch © Karine Bériault 2007 Également disponible en français sous le titre « Plan de gestion du monarque (Danaus plexippus) au Canada » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2016. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-100-25735-8 Catalogue no. En3-5/71-2016E-PDF Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=24F7211B-1 Management Plan for the Monarch 2016 PREFACE The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996)2 agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of management plans for listed Special Concern species and are required to report on progress within five years after the publication of the final document on the SAR Public Registry.
    [Show full text]
  • Karen Oberhauser (Presenter) and Wendy Caldwell
    CURRICULUM VITAE KAREN S. OBERHAUSER Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology University of Minnesota Education B.A. Harvard University, 1979 Biology B.S. University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1981 Natural Science Education Ph.D. University of Minnesota, 1989 Ecology and Behavioral Biology, Genetics Minor [Advisors: P.A. Abrams and J.W. Curtsinger] Positions/Employment University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (1991-present) Professor, 2013-present Associate Professor, 2008-2013 Assistant Professor, 2003-2008 Outreach/Teaching Assistant Professor, 2002-2003 Research Associate and Adjunct Assistant Professor, 1991-2002 Onalaska High School, Wisconsin (Biology and Chemistry Teacher), 1981-1984 Brief Biography My students and I conduct research on several aspects of monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) ecology, including reproductive ecology, host-parasite interactions, factors affecting the distribution and abundance of immature monarch stages, habitat management and availability, and risks posed by global climate change and pest control practices to monarch butterflies. Our research employs traditional lab and field techniques, as well as contributions of a variety of other audiences through citizen science. I have a strong interest in engaging K-12 students and teachers in inquiry-based science and promoting a citizenry with a high degree of scientific and environmental literacy. To this end, I have developed a comprehensive science education program called Monarchs in the Classroom, which involves courses and workshops for teachers, opportunities for youth to engage in research and share their findings with broad audiences, a nationwide Citizen Science project called the Monarch Larva Monitoring Project, and curriculum development. I am passionate about the conservation of the world’s biodiversity, and believe that the connections my projects promote between monarchs, humans, and the natural world will help to promote conservation actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pepper Pest Management
    Pepper Pest Management Kaushalya Amarasekare Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Entomology Dept. of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences College of Agriculture Tennessee State University University of Maryland Nashville, Tennessee Extension snaped.fns.usda.gov Goal The goal of this training is to educate stakeholders on arthropods (pest insects and mites) that damage peppers and methods to manage them using integrated pest management (IPM) techniques Objectives Upon completion of this training, the participants will be able to 1) teach, 2) demonstrate and 3) guide growers, small farmers, backyard and community gardeners, master gardeners, and other stakeholders on management of pest arthropods in peppers Course Outline 1. Introduction: background information on bell and chili pepper 2. Pests of pepper a) Seedling Pests b) Foliage Feeders c) Pod Feeders 3. Summary 4. References Introduction Bell /sweet pepper Peppers • Family Solanaceae • Capsicum annum L. • Bell/sweet peppers and chili agmrc.org Peppers: consumed as • Fresh • Dried chili pepper • Ground as spices • Processed (canned, pickled, brined or in salsas) 570cjk, Creative Commons wifss.ucdavis.edu Bell Pepper • 2017: U.S. consumption of fresh bell peppers ~ 11.4 lbs./person • High in vitamin C and dietary fiber • Provide small amounts of several vitamins and minerals • Usually sold as fresh produce Maturity Sugar Content Chili Pepper • 2017: U.S. consumption of chili peppers ~ 7.7 lbs./person • High in vitamin C • Small amounts of vitamin A and B-6, iron and magnesium 570cjk, Creative Commons wifss.ucdavis.edu • Sold as fresh produce and dried (whole peppers, crushed or powdered) pepperscale.com Myscha Theriault U.S. green pepper production • U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Parasitoid?
    BUTTERFLY INSECT PARASITOID FAUNA AT PIERCE CEDAR CREEK INSTITUTE JULIA MESSENGER, ALICIA FREEMAN, AND DR. MATTHEW DOUGLAS Department of Biology, Grand Rapids Community College Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA November 25, 2011 For Submission To: Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History 900 Exposition Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90007-4057 ABSTRACT Butterflies (Order Lepidoptera; Superfamily Papilionoidea) at Pierce Cedar Creek Institute were hypothesized to be the hosts for a number of insect parasitoid species that ultimately kill their hosts in the larval or pupal stages. Our research attempted to understand the basic ecology of these native insect parasitoids and their abundance at PCCI. We were able to successfully rear just three parasitoid species (two from Order Hymenoptera; one from Order Diptera) from the following hosts: the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), the Spicebush swallowtail (Papilio troilus), and the Baltimore checkerspot (Euphydryas phaeton). We discuss these unexpected results and also attempt to operationally define the following terms: parasitoid, parasite, pathogen, and predator. Our intent in this latter regard is to clearly distinguish between insect parasites and insect parasitoids. A Definition Conundrum: What is a Parasitoid? In this paper we will first attempt to establish operational (functional) definitions that will distinguish parasitoids from parasites, pathogens, and predators. The term parasitoid was first coined by the German writer O.M. Reuter in 1913 and adopted by the American hymenopterist and insect embryologist William Morton Wheeler in 1937. Only in the last 25 years has this term become universally accepted. Before that, parasitoids were most commonly referred to as insect parasites (van Lenteren, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation of Wild Parsnip, Pastinaca Sativa L., to Parasitoid Populations Associated with Soybean Pests in Central Iowa
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1983 The elr ation of wild parsnip, Pastinaca sativa L., to parasitoid populations associated with soybean pests in central Iowa Linda Anne Buntin Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Buntin, Linda Anne, "The er lation of wild parsnip, Pastinaca sativa L., to parasitoid populations associated with soybean pests in central Iowa " (1983). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8455. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8455 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parasitoid Complex of Forest Tent Caterpillar, Malacosoma Disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae), in Eastern Wyoming Shelterbelts
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 24 Number 4 - Winter 1991 Number 4 - Winter Article 7 1991 December 1991 The Parasitoid Complex of Forest Tent Caterpillar, Malacosoma Disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae), in Eastern Wyoming Shelterbelts G. A. Knight R. J. Lavigne Department of Plant, Soil and Insect Sciences M. G. Pogue Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Knight, G. A.; Lavigne, R. J.; and Pogue, M. G. 1991. "The Parasitoid Complex of Forest Tent Caterpillar, Malacosoma Disstria (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae), in Eastern Wyoming Shelterbelts," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 24 (4) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol24/iss4/7 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Knight et al.: The Parasitoid Complex of Forest Tent Caterpillar, <i>Malacosoma 1991 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 255 THE PARASITOID COMPLEX OF FOREST TENT CATERPILLAR, MALA COSOMA DISSTRJA (LEPIDOPTERA: LASIOCAMPIDAE), IN EASTERN WYOMING SHELTERBELTSI G. A. Knight2, R. J. Lavigne3 and M. G. Pogue4 ABSTRACT A parasitoid complex affecting the forest tent caterpillar, Malacosoma disstria, was investigated during 1978-79 in shelterbelts in eastern Wyoming. Egg parasitoids included five species: Ablerus clisiocampae, Ooencyrtus clisiocampae, Telenomus clisiocampae, Tetrastichus sp. 1 and Telenomus sp. Thirteen hymenopterous species and five dipterous species were reared from larvae and pupae of the forest tent caterpillar.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Host Range of Agents for Biological Control of Arthropods: Rationale, Methodology and Interpretation
    Proceedings: Host Specificity Testing of Exotic Arthropod Biological Control Agents: The Biological Basis for Improvement in Safety Evaluating the Host Range of Agents for Biological Control of Arthropods: Rationale, Methodology and Interpretation D.P.A. Sands1 and R.G. Van Driesche2 1CSIRO Entomology, Private Bag No. 3, Indooroopilly Queensland 4068, Australia 2Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA 01003 Abstract Before releasing exotic natural enemies for biological control of weeds, host range tests are almost universally required by authorities, to ensure that agents are unlikely to have detrimental impacts on non-target plants. However, for biological control of arthropod pests, tests to determine the potential host range of exotic agents have not been so widely practiced, leading to concerns that agents once established may have undesired impacts on beneficial organisms and native fauna. The rationale for host range tests is similar for weeds and arthropod projects and the centrifugal method for selecting non-target taxa related to a target is applicable to both, but the taxonomic relationships for arthropods are often not as well known as for plants. The number and range of non-target arthropods to be tested with an exotic agent must be selected carefully, since it is impractical to maintain in culture an extensive range of taxa. Non- target beneficial or threatened arthropod taxa may be priorities for testing as potential hosts but their life histories are sometimes unknown or appropriate stages may be difficult to obtain or culture. Tritrophic agent/ host/plant interactions are not uncom- mon and difficult to evaluate, and predators need special evaluation when compared with parasitoids.
    [Show full text]