DOCSLIB.ORG

Poor Print Ual1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 446 972 SE 064 222 TITLE Why and How You Should Learn Math and Science. Hearing before the Committee on Science, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, First Session. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Science. REPORT NO House-Hrg-106-21 ISBN ISBN-0-16-059451-0 PUB DATE 1999-03-17 NOTE 279p. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Educational Change; Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Government; *Federal Legislation; Hearings; *Mathematics Education; *Relevance (Education); *Science Education IDENTIFIERS Congress 106th ABSTRACT This document presents the hearing before the Committee on Science in the House of Representatives on why and how math and science should be learned. It includes oral opening statements by various House representatives. Appendix 1 presents written opening statements from members of the subcommittee on basic research. Appendix 2 features written testimony, biographies, financial disclosures, and answers to post-hearing questions. Materials for the record are listed in the third appendix and include "Preparing Our Children: Math and Science r:Aucation in the National Interest" and "Winning the Skills Race: A Council on Competitiveness Report on Mathematics and Science Education". (ASX) POOR PRINTUAL1 Pgs Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. WHY AND HOW YOU SHOULD LEARN MATH AND SCIENCE 7r LT4 HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 17, 1999 Serial No. 106-21 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 58-108 WASHINGTON : 1999 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-059451-0 t. AVAILABLE 2. BEST COPY COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE HON. F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., Chairman SHERWOOD L. BOEHLERT, New York GEORGE E. BROWN, JR., California LAMAR SMITH, Texas RALPH M. HALL, Texas CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland BART GORDON, Tennessee CURT WELDON, Pennsylvania JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois DANA ROHRABACHER, California JAMES A. BARCIA, Michigan JOE BARTON, Texas EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas KEN CALVERT, California LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California NICK SMITH, Michigan LYNN N. RIVERS, Michigan ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland ZOE LOFGREN, California VERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania DAVE WELDON, Florida SHEILA JACKSON-LEE, Texas GIL GUTKNECHT, Minnesota DEBBIE STABENOW, Michigan THOMAS W. EWING, Illinois BOB ETHERIDGE, North Carolina CHRIS CANNON, Utah NICK LAMPSON, Texas KEVIN BRADY, Texas JOHN B. LARSON, Connecticut MERRILL COOK, Utah MARK UDALL, Colorado GEORGE R NETHERCUTT, JR., WashingtonDAVID WU, Oregon FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma ANTHONY D. WEINER, New York MARK GREEN, Wisconsin MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts STEVEN T. KUYKENDALL, California BRIAN BAIRD, Washington GARY G. MILLER, California JOSEPH M. HOEFFEL, Pennsylvania JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois DENNIS MOORE, Kansas MARSHALL "MARK" SANFORD, South Carolina JACK METCALF, Washington CONTENTS Page Oral Opening Statement by Representative F. James Sensenbrenner, Chair- man, Committee on Science, U.S. House ofRepresentatives 1 Oral Opening Statement by Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson,Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Basic Research, U.S. House ofRep- resentatives 2 Oral Opening Statement by Representative Vernon Ehlers, Vice-Chairman, Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives 3 Oral Opening Statement by Representative George Brown, RankingMinority Member, Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives 5 PANEL Dr. Vera Rubin, Member, National Science Board: Oral Testimony 7 Dr. Rodger Bybee, Executive Director, Center for Science, Mathand Engi- neering Education: Oral Testimony 8 Dr. Joan Ferrini-Mundy, Associate Executive Director, Center forScience, Math and Engineering Education: Oral Testimony 10 Ms. Amy Kas low, Senior Fellow, Council on Competitiveness: Oral Testimony 12 Dr. Shirley Malcom, Director or Education and Human Resources,American Association for the Advancement of Science: Oral Testimony 15 Mr. John E. Harrison, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Ecutel:Oral Testimony 16 Discussion/Questions 18 Appendix 1: Written Opening Statements from Members of the Subcommittee on Basic Research Opening Statement by Representative F. James Sensenbrenner, Chairman, Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives 40 Opening Statement by Representative Vernon Ehlers, Vice-Chairman, Com- mittee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives 41 Opening Statement by Representative Nick Smith, Chairman, Subcommittee on Basic Research, U.S. House of Representatives 45 Opening Statement by Representative Judy Biggert, Vice-Chairwoman, Sub- committee on Basic Research, U.S. House of Representatives 46 Opening Statement by Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson, Ranking Mi- nority Member, Subcommittee on Basic Research, U.S. House of Represent- atives 47 Opening Statement by Representative Bob Etheridge, Member, Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives 50 Opening Statement by Representative Debbie Stabenow, Member, Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives 52 Opening Statement by Representative Sheila Jackson-Lee, Member,Com- mittee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives 54 Appendix 2: Written Testimony, Biographies, Financial Disclosures, and Answers to Post-Hearing Questions Dr. Vera Rubin, Member, National Science Board: Written Testimony 57 Biography 65 Answers to Post-Hearing Questions 66 Iv Page Dr. Rodger Bybee, Executive Director, Center for Science, Math and Engi- neering Education and Dr. Joan Ferrini-Mundy, Associate Executive Direc- tor, Center for Science, Math and Engineering Education: Written Testimony 69 Biography for Dr. Roger Bybee 83 Biography for Dr. Joan Ferrini-Mundy 84 Financial Disclosure 85 Answers to Post-Hearing Questions 87 Ms. Amy Kas low, Senior Fellow, Council on Competitiveness: Written Testimony 95 Biography 98 Financial Disclosure 100 Answers to Post-Hearing Questions 101 Dr. Shirley Malcom, Director of Education and Human Resources, American Association for the Advancement of Science: Written Testimony 109 Biography 121 Financial Disclosure 122 Answers to Post-Hearing Questions 123 Mr. John E. Harrison, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Ecutel: Written Testimony 135 Biography 137 Financial Disclosure 138 Appendix 3: Material for the Record Additional Material from Representative Bob Etheridge, Member, Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, "Color Blind"; The New Repub- lic, March 29, 1999 edition 140 Preparing Our Children: Math and Science Education In the National Inter- est. An NSB Report on Mathematics and Science Achievement 147 Winning the Skills Race. A Council on Competitiveness Report on Mathe- matics and Science Education 181 HEARING ON WHY AND HOW YOU SHOULD LEARN MATH AND SCIENCE WEDNESDAY, MARCH 17, 1999 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, Washington, DC. The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:00 a.m., in room 2318, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. F. James Sensen- brenner (Chairman of the Committee) presiding. Chairman SENSENBRENNER[presiding].The Committee on Science will come to order. Today, I want to welcome everyone here today for the first in a series of hearings the Science Committee will be holding on science, math, engineering, and technology education. As you may know, last year I charged Congressman Ehlers with developing an approach to a new national science policy. As a re- sult of over a year's work, the Committee released the study, "Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New National Science Policy," a major focus of which is math and science education. As the report notes, math and science education is the road that will ensure American preeminence in technology and prepare American stu- dents to be able employees, smart consumers, and engaged citizens. I am pleased that the Committee is following up on this aspectof the Science Policy Study, as education is one of the most important issues we must address. By now it is old news that U.S. students are not performing to the level of their peers around the world. In fact, U.S. students per- form near the bottom. Clearly, American children are not receiving an adequate education in math andscience, and we as a Nation should be concerned. We can and must do a better job of preparing our young people for the 21st centuryand we have an obligation to see that students receive the education they will need if they are to compete and win in the global marketplace of the future. This series of hearings will serve as a comprehensive examina- tion of current science and math education, the directions science and math education may take in the future, and programmatic re- forms that may be necessary to ensure graduates of U.S. schools are well prepared. The examinationwill require assessing the cur- rent situation and understanding the specific weaknesses in our education systems. The most technologically advanced
Recommended publications
  • Conduct of Monetary Policy, Report of the Federal Reserve Board, July 24

    Conduct of Monetary Policy, Report of the Federal Reserve Board, July 24

    CONDUCT OF MONETARY POLICY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 24, 1997 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking and Financial Services Serial No. 105-25 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 42-634 CC WASHINGTON : 1997 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-055923-5 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis HOUSE COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa, Chairman BILL MCCOLLUM, Florida, Vice Chairman MARGE ROUKEMA, New Jersey HENRY B. GONZALEZ, Texas DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska JOHN J. LAFALCE, New York RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana BRUCE F. VENTO, Minnesota RICK LAZIO, New York CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SPENCER BACHUS, Alabama BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts MICHAEL N. CASTLE, Delaware PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania PETER T. KING, New York JOSEPH P. KENNEDY II, Massachusetts TOM CAMPBELL, California FLOYD H. FLAKE, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California MAXINE WATERS, California FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York JACK METCALF, Washington LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois ROBERT W. NEY, Ohio LUCILLE ROYBAL-ALLARD, California ROBERT L. EHRLICH JR., Maryland THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin BOB BARR, Georgia NYDIA M. VELAZQUEZ, New York JON D. FOX, Pennsylvania MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina SUE W. KELLY, New York MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York RON PAUL, Texas GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York DAVE WELDON, Florida KEN BENTSEN, Texas JIM RYUN, Kansas JESSE L. JACKSON JR., Illinois MERRILL COOK, Utah CYNTHIA A.
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964

    The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964

    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
  • Newsletter02.Pdf

    Newsletter02.Pdf

    Fall 2002 sion at the University. A committee has Now I am sounding like a politician get- From the Director been formed. Could the Institute become ting ready to run for re-election. But I am a center for policy work? Should it seek so proud of what we have done, and of the expansion? How about new programs? great work of our staff, that I just want to These are just some of the questions the crow a little. Please excuse me. And I am committee will explore. After thirty-seven not running again! years of excellence, “If it ain’t broke, don’t I still need to work. I’m looking for fix it,” must apply. But it is also timely to some consulting opportunities. I would look to the future. like to hang out here through some teach- I often contemplate the wonderful char- ing. I will aid the new director as coal sketch of our founder Robert H. requested. The Hinckley Institute of Hinckley by Alvin Gittins that warms my Politics and the University of Utah will office. The eyes focus on the future. The remain a big part of my life. face is filled with compassion yet reflects a But there are mountains to climb- no-non-sense attitude. Par-ti-ci-pa-tion - as motorcycles to rev-grandchildren to hug- Mr. Hinckley said it while emphasizing and “many a mile before I sleep.” every syllable - is what we are about. And participation is what my staff and I have sought to deliver. I will miss my second family.
  • Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Antiquates the Antiquities Act

    Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Antiquates the Antiquities Act

    The Straw that Broke the Camel's Back? Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Antiquates the Antiquities Act ERIC C. RUSNAK* The public lands of the United States have always provided the arena in which we Americans have struggled to fulfill our dreams. Even today dreams of wealth, adventure, and escape are still being acted out on these far flung lands. These lands and the dreams-fulfilled and unfulfilled-which they foster are a part of our national destiny. They belong to all Americans. 1 I. INTRODUCTION For some Americans, public lands are majestic territories for exploration, recreation, preservation, or study. Others depend on public lands as a source of income and livelihood. And while a number of Americans lack awareness regarding the opportunities to explore their public lands, all Americans attain benefits from these common properties. Public land affect all Americans. Because of the importance of these lands, heated debates inevitably arise regarding their use or nonuse. The United States Constitution grants to Congress the "[p]ower to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the... Property belonging to the United States." 2 Accordingly, Congress, the body representing the populace, determines the various uses of our public lands. While the Constitution purportedly bestows upon Congress sole discretion to manage public lands, the congressionally-enacted Antiquities Act conveys some of this power to the president, effectively giving rise to a concurrent power with Congress to govern public lands. On September 18, 1996, President William Jefferson Clinton issued Proclamation 69203 under the expansive powers granted to the president by the Antiquities Act4 ("the Act") establishing, in the State of Utah, the Grand * B.A., Wittenberg University, 2000; J.D., The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, 2003 (expected).
  • 2000 11-07 General Election

    2000 11-07 General Election

    2000 General Election, Salt Lake County, Utah These results are for Salt Lake County only Summary Information Precincts Counted 688 Number of registered voters 444186 Total ballots cast 312098 70.26% Straight Party Ballots Cast Democrat 46553 46.04% Republican 50225 49.67% Independent American 3509 3.47% Libertarian 504 0.50% Natural Law 183 0.18% Reform 149 0.15% 101123 100% President and Vice President Democrat - Al Gore and Joseph Lieberman 107576 35.01% Republican - George W. Bush and Dick Cheney 171585 55.84% Green - Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke 21252 6.92% Independent American - Howard Phillips and Curtis Frazier 896 0.29% Libertarian - Harry Browne and Art Olivier 1699 0.55% Natural Law - John Hagelin and Nat Goldhaber 388 0.13% Reform - Pat Buchanan and Ezola Foster 3676 1.20% Socialist - James Harris and Margaret Trowe 101 0.03% Unaffiliated - Louie G. Youngkeit and Robert Leo Beck 85 0.03% Write In - Earnest Lee Easton 0 0.00% Write In - Keith Lewis Kunzler 0 0.00% Write In - Forrest C. Labelle 0 0.00% Write In - Daniel J. Pearlman 0 0.00% Write In - Joe Schriner 0 0.00% Write In - Gloria Dawn Strickland 0 0.00% United States Senate Democrat - Scott Howell 130329 42.43% Republican - Orrin G. Hatch 168029 54.70% Independent American - Carlton Edward Bowen 4222 1.37% Libertarian - Jim Dexter 4597 1.50% United States House of Representatives U.S. Representative District 1 Precincts Counted 2 Registered Voters 688 Ballots Cast 319 46.37% Democrat - Kathleen McConkie Collinwood 151 49.51% Republican - James V.
  • Distribution Listlist - New Information

    Distribution Listlist - New Information

    12.012.0 DistributionDistribution ListList - New Information - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) pro- vided copies of this Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to Federal, state, and local elected and appointed officials and agencies of government; Native American groups; national, state, and local environmental and public interest groups; and other organizations and individuals list- ed below. In addition, DOE sent copies of the Final EIS to all persons who comment- ed on the Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Draft Environmental Impact Statement; these individuals are list- ed in the Index (Alphabetical List of Commentors by Name) in Chapter 11 of this Final EIS. Other groups that received copies of the Final EIS but are not listed below are internal Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory and DOE employees, media representa- tives, and EIS project staff, as well as DOE reading rooms, which appear in Section 8 of the Final EIS Summary. 12-1 DOE/EIS-0287 Distribution List - New Information - In preparation for distribution of the Final EIS, The Honorable Ron Wyden DOE mailed postcards to EIS stakeholders, United States Senate (Oregon) inviting them to request copies of the document in various formats. DOE also issued press The Honorable Robert F. Bennett releases to Idaho media outlets, announcing the United States Senate (Utah) upcoming publication of the Final EIS and describing the document request process. DOE The Honorable Orrin Hatch will provide copies to other interested organiza- United
  • October-1992-Vol5-No8.Pdf

    October-1992-Vol5-No8.Pdf

    ,- II ii r! ! Explore the world of WEST LAW. I. ¡ FREE for 60 days! i ! West Publishing is now making WAIVER FREE Training. a series afmoney-saving of Connect You'll conduct case-building research FREE bonuses available to Time/Communications quickly and effciently with help from PC Charges for 60 Days. WESTrain"1I diskettes and telephone first-time subscribers. Every time you sign on WESTLAW during training with one of our WESTLAW experts. the first 60 days, the charges are on us. Sign upJor a oneyear subscription (Some limitations may apply.) to WESTLAW andyou'll receive: (Some limitations apply.) FREE TAKE ADVANTAGE FREE WESTCheck"Automated Citation of this limited-time offer! Database Usage for 60 Days. Checking for 60 Days. Explore WESTLAW databases and discover Use this popular WESTLAW feature to check Call 1- 800-255-2549, the amazing array of information now citations automatically. You'll always be Ext. 998 today! instantaneously available. certain that the authority you rely on You also get special bonuses on DIALOG" on remains good law. WESTLA W usage, Business Information Reports from Dun & Bradstreet Information FREÈ Services' Online Service, and Washington EZ ACCESS'M Research Service Alert usage. I\tJLiiI+WI for 6 Months. (! (Regular charges apply to other Third Party Services) Make your first online research session effcient and productive. Just answer the More ways to wi questions that appear on your screen to retrieve cases, statutes and other documents. 191992 West Publishing Company 2-9241-4/8-92 I 3355971 i ¡ Ii j -i Utalz~ UTAH BAR JOURNAL Published hy The Utah State Bar 645 South 200 East Vol.
  • Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates the Politics and Process of Utah’S Unique Convention and Primary System

    Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates the Politics and Process of Utah’S Unique Convention and Primary System

    Research Report Report Number 704, November 2011 Nominating Candidates The Politics and Process of Utah’s Unique Convention and Primary System HIGHLIGHTS For most of its history, Utah has used a convention- g Utah is one of only seven states that still uses a primary system to nominate candidates for elected office. convention, and the only one that allows political parties to preclude a primary election for major In the spring of election years, citizens in small caucus offices if candidates receive enough delegate votes. g Utah adopted a direct primary in 1937, a system meetings held throughout the state elect delegates to which lasted 10 years. represent them at county and state conventions. County g In 1947, the Legislature re-established a caucus- convention system. If a candidate obtained 70% or conventions nominate candidates for races solely within more of the delegates’ votes in the convention, he or she was declared the nominee without a primary. the county boundaries, while the state convention is used g In the 1990s, the Legislature granted more power to the parties to manage their conventions. In 1996, to nominate candidates for statewide offices or those the 70% threshold to avoid a primary was lowered to 60% by the Democratic Party. The Republican that serve districts that span multiple counties. At these Party made the same change in 1999. conventions, delegates nominate candidates to compete g Utah’s historically high voter turnout rates have consistently declined in recent decades. In 1960, for their party’s nomination in the primary election, or, 78.3% of the voting age population voted in the general election.
  • 1. Immigration Reform Is Broadly Popular in Available District-Specific Polling of Republican-Held Congressional Seats

    1. Immigration Reform Is Broadly Popular in Available District-Specific Polling of Republican-Held Congressional Seats

    To: Interested Parties From: America’s Voice Re: Two Keys to Understanding Public Opinion on Immigration Reform and Republicans Date: Jan 29, 2014 The upcoming House Republican retreat will play a pivotal role in determining how the House tackles immigration reform. Based on a detailed array of district-level polls, it’s clear that the American people are firmly in favor of a path to citizenship for aspiring Americans. While opponents attempt to portray this component of immigration reform as contentious, it’s actually the consensus position among all voters, including Republican primary voters. The following pages offer substantiation for two key points: 1. Immigration reform is broadly popular in available district-specific polling of Republican-held congressional seats. Available district-specific immigration polling, conducted in the past year by both Democratic and Republican-affiliated pollsters in 25 different Republican-held districts, shows consistent and broad public support for immigration reform. Notably, both likely voters and self-identified Republican likely voters support a path to earned legalization and citizenship as part of a broader immigration fix in district after district. In every district polled, citizenship topped other policy alternatives. In addition to the district-specific polling results, several polls of aggregated congressional district polling assess immigration sentiment in a broader number of competitive House districts. Among Latino voters and all likely voters in these aggregated congressional battleground polls, support is overwhelming on behalf of an immigration reform package that includes a path to citizenship. 2. The fear that Republican primary voters don’t support immigration reform is overstated – in fact, Republican primary voters are more pragmatic and pro-reform than conventional political wisdom assumes.
  • Participation

    Participation

    PARTICIPATION A LOOK BACK AT 2007 Hinckley Institute Holds 2000th Hinckley Forum “OUR YOUNG, BEST MINDS MUST BE ENCOURAGED TO ENTER POLITICS.” Robert H. Hinckley 2 In This Issue Dr. J.D. Williams Page 3 Hinckley News Page 4 Internship Programs Page 8 Outstanding Interns Page 16 Scholarships Page 18 PARTICIPATION Hinckley Forums Page 20 Alumni Spotlights Page 25 Hinckley Staff Page 26 Donors Page 28 Hinckley Institute Holds 2000th Hinckley Forum Since 1965, the Hinckley Institute has held more than 2,000 Hinckley Forums (previously known as “Coffee & Politics”) featuring local, national, and international political leaders. Hinckley Forums provide University of Utah students and the surrounding community intimate access to and interaction with our nation’s leaders. Under the direction of Hinck- ley Institute assistant director Jayne Nelson, the Hinckley Institute hosts 65-75 forums each year in the newly renovated Hinckley Caucus Room. Partnerships with supporting Univer- sity of Utah colleges and departments, local radio and news stations, our generous donors, and the Sam Rich Program in International Politics ensure the continued success of the Hinckley Forums program. University of Utah students can now receive credit for attend- ing Hinckley Forums by enrolling in the Political Forum Series course (Political Science 3910). All Hinckley Forums are free and open to the public. For a detailed listing of 2007 Hinckley Forums, refer to pages 20 – 24. Past Hinckley Forum Guests Prince Turki Al-Faisal Archibald Cox Edward Kennedy Frank Moss Karl Rove Al Saud Russ Feingold William Lawrence Ralph Nader Larry Sabato Norman Bangerter Gerald Ford Michael Leavitt Richard Neustadt Brian Schweitzer Robert Bennett Jake Garn Richard Lugar Dallin H.
  • Hr 1487, the National Monument Nepa Compliance Act Hearing

    Hr 1487, the National Monument Nepa Compliance Act Hearing

    H.R. 1487, THE NATIONAL MONUMENT NEPA COMPLIANCE ACT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDS OF THE COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 17, 1999, WASHINGTON, DC Serial No. 106±38 Printed for the use of the Committee on Resources ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house or Committee address: http://www.house.gov/resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 58±958 u WASHINGTON : 1999 VerDate 11-SEP-98 07:11 Nov 17, 1999 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 58958 HRESOUR1 PsN: HRESOUR1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES DON YOUNG, Alaska, Chairman W.J. (BILLY) TAUZIN, Louisiana GEORGE MILLER, California JAMES V. HANSEN, Utah NICK J. RAHALL II, West Virginia JIM SAXTON, New Jersey BRUCE F. VENTO, Minnesota ELTON GALLEGLY, California DALE E. KILDEE, Michigan JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon JOEL HEFLEY, Colorado ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California Samoa WAYNE T. GILCHREST, Maryland NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii KEN CALVERT, California SOLOMON P. ORTIZ, Texas RICHARD W. POMBO, California OWEN B. PICKETT, Virginia BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey HELEN CHENOWETH, Idaho CALVIN M. DOOLEY, California GEORGE P. RADANOVICH, California CARLOS A. ROMERO-BARCELO, Puerto WALTER B. JONES, JR., North Carolina Rico WILLIAM M. (MAC) THORNBERRY, Texas ROBERT A. UNDERWOOD, Guam CHRIS CANNON, Utah PATRICK J. KENNEDY, Rhode Island KEVIN BRADY, Texas ADAM SMITH, Washington JOHN PETERSON, Pennsylvania WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts RICK HILL, Montana CHRIS JOHN, Louisiana BOB SCHAFFER, Colorado DONNA CHRISTIAN-CHRISTENSEN, Virgin JIM GIBBONS, Nevada Islands MARK E.
  • Date Set for Incorporation Elections Stansbury Park, Lake Point Voters Will Make City Decisions on Nov

    Date Set for Incorporation Elections Stansbury Park, Lake Point Voters Will Make City Decisions on Nov

    FRONT PAGE A1 TOOELE RANSCRIPT Cowboys still T undefeated after besting Richfield See B1 BULLETIN THURSDAY March 17, 2016 www.TooeleOnline.com Vol. 122 No. 84 $1.00 Date set for incorporation elections Stansbury Park, Lake Point voters will make city decisions on Nov. 8 by Tim Gillie tion for both proposed munici- STAFF WRITER palities. Incorporation petition spon- Residents of Lake Point and sors in Lake Point gathered Stansbury Park will decide this 122 valid signatures with 52 fall if their communities should signatures required to put the become cities. incorporation issue on a bal- 2016 GRANTSVILLE CHILDREN’S SOCIABLE The Tooele County lot, according to Tooele County Commission on Tuesday certi- Clerk/Auditor Marilyn Gillette. fied incorporation petitions for In Stansbury, incorporation PHOTOS Lake Point and Stansbury and set FRANCIE AUFDEMORTE Nov. 8 as the incorporation elec- SEE ELECTIONS PAGE A5 ➤ The 132nd Grantsville Sociable happens this Saturday, but local school children had a sociable event of their own today at Grantsville High School. Called “In the spotlight... right where I belong,” the 2016 children’s sociable featured a variety of students and talent. Dressed in pink polka dot outfits, FRANCIE AUFDEMORTE/TTB PHOTO the dance team of Lake Point (above) and Stansbury Park voters won’t just vote for a new U.S. Sophie Lawton, Emmy president on Nov. 8. They’ll also decide whether or not their communities should Butler, Kimber Hall, become Tooele County’s newest cities and how they will be governed. Brooke Hill and Ellie Halle (top) danced to “Splish Splash.” The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (middle) came to life in a per- Candidate filing for formance titled “Shell Shock” and featured Cabbie Beacham, election ended today Cooper Anderson, Dexter Poppe and by Tim Gillie Declaration of Candidacy form Zach Daybell.