Chris Cannon for Congress Inc.; CI Group; Cannon Industries, Inc., and Cannon Engineering Technologies, Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chris Cannon for Congress Inc.; CI Group; Cannon Industries, Inc., and Cannon Engineering Technologies, Inc Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Utah Court of Appeals Briefs 1999 Crelley Mackey v. Chris Cannon, individually, Office ofon C gressman Chris Cannon; Chris Cannon for Congress Inc.; CI Group; Cannon Industries, Inc., and Cannon Engineering Technologies, Inc. : Petition for Rehearing Utah Court of Appeals Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2 Part of the Law Commons Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Court of Appeals; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. Roger H. Hoole, Heather E. Morrison; Hoole and King, L.C.; Attorneys for Plaintiff. Mary Anne Q. Wood; Wood and Crapo; Richard M. Hymas; Nielsen and Senior, P.C. Frederick M. Herrera; U.S. House of Representatives Office of Employment Counsel; Attorneys for Defendants. Recommended Citation Legal Brief, Mackey v. Cannon, No. 990123 (Utah Court of Appeals, 1999). https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/byu_ca2/2029 This Legal Brief is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Court of Appeals Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/utah_court_briefs/policies.html. Please contact the Repository Manager at [email protected] with questions or feedback. UTAH DOCUMENT KFU 50 .A10 DOCKET NO. _W/f*'fllNTffrTrnif COURT OF APPEALS Crelley Mackey, Plaintiff and Appellant, PETITION FOR REHEARING Chris Cannon, individually; Office of Court of Appeals No. 990123-CA Congressman Chris Cannon; Chris Cannon for Congress, Inc.; CI Group; Cannon Industries, Inc., and Cannon Engineering Technologies, Inc., Priority Category No. 15 Defendants and Appellees APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OF THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, JUDGE HOMER F. WILKINSON Roger H. Hoole Richard M. Hymas, USB No. 1612 Heather E. Morrison NIELSEN & SENIOR, P.C. Hoole & King, L.C. 60 East South Temple, Suite 1100 4276 South Highland Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Salt Lake City, Utah 84124 Telephone: (801) 532-1900 Attorneys for Plaintiff Frederick M. Herrera, Associate Counsel U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mary Anne Q. Wood OFFICE OF EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL Wood & Crapo 433 Cannon House Office Building 60 East South Temple, Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20515 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (202) 225-7075 Attorneys for Chris Cannon, individually, Attorneys for the Employing Office of Chris Cannon for Congress, Inc., and Congressman Chris Cannon Cannon Industries, Inc. Julia V Clerk erf tt» IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS Crelley Mackey, Plaintiff and Appellant, PETITION FOR REHEARING v. Chris Cannon, individually; Office of Court of Appeals No. 990123-CA Congressman Chris Cannon; Chris Cannon for Congress, Inc.; CI Group; Cannon Industries, Inc., and Cannon Engineering Technologies, Inc., Priority Category No. 15 Defendants and Appellees APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT OF THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, JUDGE HOMER F. WILKINSON Roger H. Hoole Richard M. Hymas, USB No. 1612 Heather E. Morrison NIELSEN & SENIOR, P.C. Hoole & King, L.C. 60 East South Temple, Suite 1100 4276 South Highland Drive Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Salt Lake City, Utah 84124 Telephone: (801)532-1900 Attorneys for Plaintiff Frederick M. Herrera, Associate Counsel U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Mary Anne Q. Wood OFFICE OF EMPLOYMENT COUNSEL Wood & Crapo 433 Cannon House Office Building 60 East South Temple, Suite 500 Washington, D.C. 20515 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (202) 225-7075 Attorneys for Chris Cannon, individually, Attorneys for the Employing Office of Chris Cannon for Congress, Inc., and Congressman Chris Cannon Cannon Industries, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Pftge# PETITION FOR REHEARING 1 I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2 III. ARGUMENT 5 A. THE STATE COURTS OF UTAH LACK SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE EMPLOYING OFFICE OF CONGRESSMAN CHRIS CANNON PURSUANT TO U.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) AND THE CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT 5 1. Sovereign Immunity has not been waived by Congress 5 2. The Utah Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction over an employing office in the legislative branch of federal government where exclusive jurisdiction has been granted to the Office of Compliance in accordance with the Congressional Accountability Act 8 B. THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS LACKS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE EMPLOYING OFFICE OF CONGRESSMAN CHRIS CANNON BECAUSE PLAINTIFF FAILED TO EFFECT SUFFICIENT SERVICE OF PROCESS 11 IV. CONCLUSION 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 15 ATTACHMENTS 16 103650.NI211.00I ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page# CASES Brooks v. Richardson, 478 F.Supp. 793 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) 11 Fauver v. Hansen, 803 P.2d 1275 (Utah App.1990) 7 Garden Homes, Inc. v. Mason, 238 F.2d 651 (1st Cir. 1956) 12 General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Ry Co., 260 U.S. 261 (1922) 13 Hawaii v. Gordon, 373 U.S. 57 (1963) 5 Kaiser v. Miller, 115 F.R.D. 504 (D.D.C. 1987) 11 Keener v. Congress of the United States, 467 F.2d 952 (5th Cir. 1972) 6 Lane v. Pena, 518 U.S. 187 (1996) 6 Lehman v. Nakshian, 453 U.S. 156 (1981) 6 Mackey v. Cannon, 2000 UT App. 1 6, 7 Martin v. Nelson, 533 P.2d 897 (Utah 1975) 11 Mechanical Appliance Co. v. Castleman, 215 U.S. 437 (1910) 13 San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 (1959) 9 State of Utah Dep't of Social Servs. v. Vijil, 784 P.2d 1130 (Utah 1989) 7 Thompson v. Jackson, 743 P.2d 1230 (Utah App.1987) 7 United States v. Dalim, 494 U.S. 596 (1990) 5 United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 (1969) 6, 10 103650.NI211.001 iii United States v. Mitchell, 445 U.S. 535 (1980) 5 United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 (1941) 5 United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976) 6 STATUTES AND RULES 2 U.S.C. § 1301(9)(A) 8 2 U.S.C. § 1301(9)(D) 8 2 U.S.C. § 1301-1438 6 2 U.S.C. § 1381(a) 9 2 U.S.C. § 1401 9 2 U.S.C. § 1408(a) 9 2 U.S.C. § 1410 10 2 U.S.C. § 1414 9, 10 FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE R. 4(d)(5) 11 UTAHCODEANN. § 78-3-4 8 UTAH RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE R. 35 1 UTAH RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE R. 4(h) 3,12 OTHER AUTHORITIES Office of Compliance Procedural Rule § 9.05(b) 10 103650.NI211.001 iv PETITION FOR REHEARING Office of Congressman Chris Cannon (more accurately titled the Employing Office of Congressman Chris Cannon, an Employing Office within the U.S. House of Representatives), a named but unserved Defendant and Appellee in this action, appears specially by and through its attorneys, Richard M. Hymas of Nielsen & Senior, P.C. and Frederick M. Herrera of the United States House of Representatives, Office of House Employment Counsel, and petitions this Court for rehearing pursuant to Utah R. App. P. 35 for the limited purpose of contesting this Court's apparent assumption of jurisdiction over the Employing Office of Congressman Chris Cannon in this action. I. INTRODUCTION In referring to the Defendants and Appellees in its written Opinion dated February 17, 2000, the Court did not differentiate those Defendants who had been served with process, were parties in the court below, and are subject to the jurisdiction of the Court from those Defendants who had not been served with process, were not parties below, and are not subject to the Court's jurisdiction. As a result, it appears from the Opinion that the Court has exercised subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction over the Employing Office of Congressman Chris Cannon. Such an exercise of jurisdiction is improper for the following reasons: First, the courts of this State, including the district court and this Court, lack subject matter jurisdiction over any claim against the Employing Office. Second, this 103650.NI211.001 1 Court lacks personal jurisdiction over the Employing Office because it was not served with process and the district court never acquired or purported to exercise personal jurisdiction over the Employing Office. The Court's Opinion, if not corrected, will cause confusion below on remand regarding issues of jurisdiction on matters arising under a federal statute. Moreover, to allow Plaintiff— who never served the Employing Office — to be able to benefit from a ruling implicating the federal government, would be unfair, a violation of due process, a violation of the principle of sovereign immunity, and would thwart the jurisdictional requirements under Rule 4 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. The Employing Office respectfully requests that the Court amend its Opinion dated February 17, 2000, to clarify (1) that the Employing Office was not served in this action and was not a party to the appeal or the proceeding in the district court; (2) that neither this Court nor the district court has asserted subject matter jurisdiction or personal jurisdiction over the Employing Office; and (3) that the Court's Opinion reversing the decision of the district court does not apply to, and has no effect upon, the Employing Office. IL FACTUAL BACKGROUND On or about April 16, 1998, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against six defendants alleging, among other things, breach of contract. These six defendants are Chris Cannon, individually, the Office of Congressman Chris Cannon, Chris Cannon for Congress, Inc., 103650.NI211.001 2 Cannon Industries, Inc., The CI Group, and Cannon Engineering Technologies, Inc.1 Of the six defendants, only three were served with a Summons and Complaint: Chris Cannon, individually, Chris Cannon for Congress, Inc.
Recommended publications
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter02.Pdf
    Fall 2002 sion at the University. A committee has Now I am sounding like a politician get- From the Director been formed. Could the Institute become ting ready to run for re-election. But I am a center for policy work? Should it seek so proud of what we have done, and of the expansion? How about new programs? great work of our staff, that I just want to These are just some of the questions the crow a little. Please excuse me. And I am committee will explore. After thirty-seven not running again! years of excellence, “If it ain’t broke, don’t I still need to work. I’m looking for fix it,” must apply. But it is also timely to some consulting opportunities. I would look to the future. like to hang out here through some teach- I often contemplate the wonderful char- ing. I will aid the new director as coal sketch of our founder Robert H. requested. The Hinckley Institute of Hinckley by Alvin Gittins that warms my Politics and the University of Utah will office. The eyes focus on the future. The remain a big part of my life. face is filled with compassion yet reflects a But there are mountains to climb- no-non-sense attitude. Par-ti-ci-pa-tion - as motorcycles to rev-grandchildren to hug- Mr. Hinckley said it while emphasizing and “many a mile before I sleep.” every syllable - is what we are about. And participation is what my staff and I have sought to deliver. I will miss my second family.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Antiquates the Antiquities Act
    The Straw that Broke the Camel's Back? Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Antiquates the Antiquities Act ERIC C. RUSNAK* The public lands of the United States have always provided the arena in which we Americans have struggled to fulfill our dreams. Even today dreams of wealth, adventure, and escape are still being acted out on these far flung lands. These lands and the dreams-fulfilled and unfulfilled-which they foster are a part of our national destiny. They belong to all Americans. 1 I. INTRODUCTION For some Americans, public lands are majestic territories for exploration, recreation, preservation, or study. Others depend on public lands as a source of income and livelihood. And while a number of Americans lack awareness regarding the opportunities to explore their public lands, all Americans attain benefits from these common properties. Public land affect all Americans. Because of the importance of these lands, heated debates inevitably arise regarding their use or nonuse. The United States Constitution grants to Congress the "[p]ower to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the... Property belonging to the United States." 2 Accordingly, Congress, the body representing the populace, determines the various uses of our public lands. While the Constitution purportedly bestows upon Congress sole discretion to manage public lands, the congressionally-enacted Antiquities Act conveys some of this power to the president, effectively giving rise to a concurrent power with Congress to govern public lands. On September 18, 1996, President William Jefferson Clinton issued Proclamation 69203 under the expansive powers granted to the president by the Antiquities Act4 ("the Act") establishing, in the State of Utah, the Grand * B.A., Wittenberg University, 2000; J.D., The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, 2003 (expected).
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 11-07 General Election
    2000 General Election, Salt Lake County, Utah These results are for Salt Lake County only Summary Information Precincts Counted 688 Number of registered voters 444186 Total ballots cast 312098 70.26% Straight Party Ballots Cast Democrat 46553 46.04% Republican 50225 49.67% Independent American 3509 3.47% Libertarian 504 0.50% Natural Law 183 0.18% Reform 149 0.15% 101123 100% President and Vice President Democrat - Al Gore and Joseph Lieberman 107576 35.01% Republican - George W. Bush and Dick Cheney 171585 55.84% Green - Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke 21252 6.92% Independent American - Howard Phillips and Curtis Frazier 896 0.29% Libertarian - Harry Browne and Art Olivier 1699 0.55% Natural Law - John Hagelin and Nat Goldhaber 388 0.13% Reform - Pat Buchanan and Ezola Foster 3676 1.20% Socialist - James Harris and Margaret Trowe 101 0.03% Unaffiliated - Louie G. Youngkeit and Robert Leo Beck 85 0.03% Write In - Earnest Lee Easton 0 0.00% Write In - Keith Lewis Kunzler 0 0.00% Write In - Forrest C. Labelle 0 0.00% Write In - Daniel J. Pearlman 0 0.00% Write In - Joe Schriner 0 0.00% Write In - Gloria Dawn Strickland 0 0.00% United States Senate Democrat - Scott Howell 130329 42.43% Republican - Orrin G. Hatch 168029 54.70% Independent American - Carlton Edward Bowen 4222 1.37% Libertarian - Jim Dexter 4597 1.50% United States House of Representatives U.S. Representative District 1 Precincts Counted 2 Registered Voters 688 Ballots Cast 319 46.37% Democrat - Kathleen McConkie Collinwood 151 49.51% Republican - James V.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Listlist - New Information
    12.012.0 DistributionDistribution ListList - New Information - The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) pro- vided copies of this Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to Federal, state, and local elected and appointed officials and agencies of government; Native American groups; national, state, and local environmental and public interest groups; and other organizations and individuals list- ed below. In addition, DOE sent copies of the Final EIS to all persons who comment- ed on the Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Draft Environmental Impact Statement; these individuals are list- ed in the Index (Alphabetical List of Commentors by Name) in Chapter 11 of this Final EIS. Other groups that received copies of the Final EIS but are not listed below are internal Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory and DOE employees, media representa- tives, and EIS project staff, as well as DOE reading rooms, which appear in Section 8 of the Final EIS Summary. 12-1 DOE/EIS-0287 Distribution List - New Information - In preparation for distribution of the Final EIS, The Honorable Ron Wyden DOE mailed postcards to EIS stakeholders, United States Senate (Oregon) inviting them to request copies of the document in various formats. DOE also issued press The Honorable Robert F. Bennett releases to Idaho media outlets, announcing the United States Senate (Utah) upcoming publication of the Final EIS and describing the document request process. DOE The Honorable Orrin Hatch will provide copies to other interested organiza- United
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Immigration Reform Is Broadly Popular in Available District-Specific Polling of Republican-Held Congressional Seats
    To: Interested Parties From: America’s Voice Re: Two Keys to Understanding Public Opinion on Immigration Reform and Republicans Date: Jan 29, 2014 The upcoming House Republican retreat will play a pivotal role in determining how the House tackles immigration reform. Based on a detailed array of district-level polls, it’s clear that the American people are firmly in favor of a path to citizenship for aspiring Americans. While opponents attempt to portray this component of immigration reform as contentious, it’s actually the consensus position among all voters, including Republican primary voters. The following pages offer substantiation for two key points: 1. Immigration reform is broadly popular in available district-specific polling of Republican-held congressional seats. Available district-specific immigration polling, conducted in the past year by both Democratic and Republican-affiliated pollsters in 25 different Republican-held districts, shows consistent and broad public support for immigration reform. Notably, both likely voters and self-identified Republican likely voters support a path to earned legalization and citizenship as part of a broader immigration fix in district after district. In every district polled, citizenship topped other policy alternatives. In addition to the district-specific polling results, several polls of aggregated congressional district polling assess immigration sentiment in a broader number of competitive House districts. Among Latino voters and all likely voters in these aggregated congressional battleground polls, support is overwhelming on behalf of an immigration reform package that includes a path to citizenship. 2. The fear that Republican primary voters don’t support immigration reform is overstated – in fact, Republican primary voters are more pragmatic and pro-reform than conventional political wisdom assumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Participation
    PARTICIPATION A LOOK BACK AT 2007 Hinckley Institute Holds 2000th Hinckley Forum “OUR YOUNG, BEST MINDS MUST BE ENCOURAGED TO ENTER POLITICS.” Robert H. Hinckley 2 In This Issue Dr. J.D. Williams Page 3 Hinckley News Page 4 Internship Programs Page 8 Outstanding Interns Page 16 Scholarships Page 18 PARTICIPATION Hinckley Forums Page 20 Alumni Spotlights Page 25 Hinckley Staff Page 26 Donors Page 28 Hinckley Institute Holds 2000th Hinckley Forum Since 1965, the Hinckley Institute has held more than 2,000 Hinckley Forums (previously known as “Coffee & Politics”) featuring local, national, and international political leaders. Hinckley Forums provide University of Utah students and the surrounding community intimate access to and interaction with our nation’s leaders. Under the direction of Hinck- ley Institute assistant director Jayne Nelson, the Hinckley Institute hosts 65-75 forums each year in the newly renovated Hinckley Caucus Room. Partnerships with supporting Univer- sity of Utah colleges and departments, local radio and news stations, our generous donors, and the Sam Rich Program in International Politics ensure the continued success of the Hinckley Forums program. University of Utah students can now receive credit for attend- ing Hinckley Forums by enrolling in the Political Forum Series course (Political Science 3910). All Hinckley Forums are free and open to the public. For a detailed listing of 2007 Hinckley Forums, refer to pages 20 – 24. Past Hinckley Forum Guests Prince Turki Al-Faisal Archibald Cox Edward Kennedy Frank Moss Karl Rove Al Saud Russ Feingold William Lawrence Ralph Nader Larry Sabato Norman Bangerter Gerald Ford Michael Leavitt Richard Neustadt Brian Schweitzer Robert Bennett Jake Garn Richard Lugar Dallin H.
    [Show full text]
  • Hr 1487, the National Monument Nepa Compliance Act Hearing
    H.R. 1487, THE NATIONAL MONUMENT NEPA COMPLIANCE ACT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDS OF THE COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 17, 1999, WASHINGTON, DC Serial No. 106±38 Printed for the use of the Committee on Resources ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house or Committee address: http://www.house.gov/resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 58±958 u WASHINGTON : 1999 VerDate 11-SEP-98 07:11 Nov 17, 1999 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 58958 HRESOUR1 PsN: HRESOUR1 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES DON YOUNG, Alaska, Chairman W.J. (BILLY) TAUZIN, Louisiana GEORGE MILLER, California JAMES V. HANSEN, Utah NICK J. RAHALL II, West Virginia JIM SAXTON, New Jersey BRUCE F. VENTO, Minnesota ELTON GALLEGLY, California DALE E. KILDEE, Michigan JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon JOEL HEFLEY, Colorado ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American JOHN T. DOOLITTLE, California Samoa WAYNE T. GILCHREST, Maryland NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii KEN CALVERT, California SOLOMON P. ORTIZ, Texas RICHARD W. POMBO, California OWEN B. PICKETT, Virginia BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey HELEN CHENOWETH, Idaho CALVIN M. DOOLEY, California GEORGE P. RADANOVICH, California CARLOS A. ROMERO-BARCELO, Puerto WALTER B. JONES, JR., North Carolina Rico WILLIAM M. (MAC) THORNBERRY, Texas ROBERT A. UNDERWOOD, Guam CHRIS CANNON, Utah PATRICK J. KENNEDY, Rhode Island KEVIN BRADY, Texas ADAM SMITH, Washington JOHN PETERSON, Pennsylvania WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts RICK HILL, Montana CHRIS JOHN, Louisiana BOB SCHAFFER, Colorado DONNA CHRISTIAN-CHRISTENSEN, Virgin JIM GIBBONS, Nevada Islands MARK E.
    [Show full text]
  • 05357 HIP Newsltr Press.Indd
    PARTICIPATION WINTER 2005 40th Anniversary for Hinckley Institute of Politics The Hinckley Institute of Politics will celebrate IN THIS ISSUE its 40th anniversary and announce the new director of the Hinckley Institute at an event in September. Institute History Page 2 The gathering will feature a prominent guest Scholarships Page 3 speaker and a program about the history of the Outstanding Interns Page 4 Institute. All former interns and students, commu- Congressional Interns Page 5 nity members, friends of the Institute, and elected Former Interns Page 5 officials are invited to attend. Further details will Featured Internships Page 6 be released in the coming months. We hope to see Hinckley News Page 6 you there! Semester Abroad Page 8 Hinckley Staff Page 9 Hinckley Forums Page 10 From top to bottom: Hinckley interns with newly elected 2003-2004 Interns Page 12 Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, Jr.; 1966 Hinckley Summer interns; intern Lieu Tran with Sen. Arlen Specter and Gov. Donors Page 15 Arnold Schwarzenegger; Pres. Ronald Reagan greeting Capital Encounter Page 16 interns; and Hinckley interns campaign for Scott Matheson, Jr. 1 HINCKLEY INSTITUTE OF POLITICS PARTICIPATION History of Hinckley Institute of Politics Scholarship Award Winners Anne Bergstedt Receives John Micah Elggren Receives Robert H. Hinckley founded the Hinckley Institute of Politics in 1965 with the vision to “teach students and Anne Hinckley Scholarship Robert H. Hinckley respect for practical politics and the principle of citizen involvement in government.” Forty years later, Mr. Hinckley’s dream is a reality. Countless students, schoolteachers, and the general public have participated in Graduate Scholarship programs he made possible through the Hinckley Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • DEIS for the Proposed Private Fuel
    EDO Principal Correspondence Control FROM: DUE: 10/05/00 EDO CONTROL: G20000455 DOC DT: 09/20/00 FINAL REPLY: Governor Michael 0. Leavitt State of Utah TO: Chairman Meserve FOR SIGNATURE OF : ** PRI ** CRC NO: 00-0603 Chairman DESC: ROUTING: DEIS for the Proposed Private Fuel Storage LLC Travers (PFS) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Paperiello Miraglia Norry Craig Burns/Cyr DATE: 09/26/00 Lohaus, STP Merschoff, RIV ASSIGNED TO: CONTACT: NMSS Kane SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS: Temp I -jl-e,. Se-C-,-o I y E_-r-lbS: SEC._V-C) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Sep 25, 2000 15:27 PAPER NUMBER: LTR-00-0603 LOGGING DATE: 09/25/2000 ACTION OFFICE: EDO AUTHOR: MICHAEL LEAVITT AFFILIATION: UT-GOV ADDRESSEE: RICHARD MESERVE SUBJECT: NUREG-1714 DEIS FOR THE PRO PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE LLC (PFS) INDEPENDENT SPENT FUEL STORAGE INSTALLATION .... ACTION: Signature of Chairman DISTRIBUTION: RF, SECY TO ACK LETTER DATE: 09/20/2000 ACKNOWLEDGED No SPECIAL HANDLING: OCM #4036 NOTES: COMMISSION REVIEW FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DATE DUE: 10/10/2000 DATE SIGNED: EDO -- G20000455 STATE OF UTAH MICHAEL 0. LEAVITT OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OLENE S. WALKEP GOVERNOR SALT LAKE CITY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR 84114-0601 September 20, 2000 Richard A. Meserve, Chair U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Kevin Gover, Assistant Secretary U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Tom Fry, Director U.S. Bureau of Land Management 1849 C Street, NW Room 700-LS Washington, DC 20240 Linda J. Morgan, Chair U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 29, No. 2, 2003
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 29 Issue 2 Article 1 2003 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 29, No. 2, 2003 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (2003) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 29, No. 2, 2003," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 29 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol29/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 29, No. 2, 2003 Table of Contents CONTENTS INMEMORIAM • --Dean L. May Jan Shipps, vi • --Stanley B. Kimball Maurine Carr Ward, 2 ARTICLES • --George Q. Cannon: Economic Innovator and the 1890s Depression Edward Leo Lyman, 4 • --"Scandalous Film": The Campaign to Suppress Anti-Mormon Motion Pictures, 1911-12 Brian Q. Cannon and Jacob W. Olmstead, 42 • --Out of the Swan's Nest: The Ministry of Anthon H. Lund, Scandinavian Apostle Jennifer L. Lund, 77 • --John D. T. McAllister: The Southern Utah Years, 1876-1910 Wayne Hinton, 106 • --The Anointed Quorum in Nauvoo, 1842-45 Devery S. Anderson, 137 • --"A Providencial Means of Agitating Mormonism": Parley P. Pratt and the San Francisco Press in the 1850s Matthew J. Grow, 158 • --Epilogue to the Utah War: Impact and Legacy William P. MacKinnon, 186 REVIEWS --David Persuitte, Joseph Smith and the Origins of The Book of Mormon.
    [Show full text]
  • Poor Print Ual1
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 446 972 SE 064 222 TITLE Why and How You Should Learn Math and Science. Hearing before the Committee on Science, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, First Session. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, DC. House Committee on Science. REPORT NO House-Hrg-106-21 ISBN ISBN-0-16-059451-0 PUB DATE 1999-03-17 NOTE 279p. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Educational Change; Elementary Secondary Education; Federal Government; *Federal Legislation; Hearings; *Mathematics Education; *Relevance (Education); *Science Education IDENTIFIERS Congress 106th ABSTRACT This document presents the hearing before the Committee on Science in the House of Representatives on why and how math and science should be learned. It includes oral opening statements by various House representatives. Appendix 1 presents written opening statements from members of the subcommittee on basic research. Appendix 2 features written testimony, biographies, financial disclosures, and answers to post-hearing questions. Materials for the record are listed in the third appendix and include "Preparing Our Children: Math and Science r:Aucation in the National Interest" and "Winning the Skills Race: A Council on Competitiveness Report on Mathematics and Science Education". (ASX) POOR PRINTUAL1 Pgs Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. WHY AND HOW YOU SHOULD LEARN MATH AND SCIENCE 7r LT4 HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 17, 1999 Serial No. 106-21 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science U.S.
    [Show full text]