Mineralogy of Selected Soils from Guam

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mineralogy of Selected Soils from Guam Mineralogy of Selected Soils from Guam GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 403-F Mineralogy of Selected Soils from Guam By DOROTHY CARROLL and JOHN C. HATHAWAY with a section on DESCRIPTION OF SOIL PROFILES By CARL H. STENSLAND GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY OF GUAM, MARIANA ISLANDS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 403-F A mineralogical study of selected soil samples of Guam, including data on chemical composition, grain-size distribution, and comparison with other areas, as well as a description of soil profiles UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.G., 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract____________________________ Fl Soil genesis Continued Introduction __________________________ 1 Evidence from chemical composition Continued Outline of geology_-------_---_---_--_- 2 Soils on volcanic parent rocks Continued Ferric oxide____________________________ F28 Soils of Guam_________-___-_-_---_--_- 3 Titania__ _____________________ 28 Methods of examination._______________ 4 Water. ________________________________ 29 Mechanical analysis______________ 4 Soils on limestones__________________________ 29 Chemical analysis________________ 5 Silica__________________________ 29 Mineralogical analysis ____________ 5 Alumina,_ _____________________________ 30 Results of analyses___________________ 7 Ferric oxide____________________________ 30 Mechanical composition ____________ 7 Titania__________________________ 30 Soil reaction. _____________________ 9 Phosphate. ________________________ 30 Chemical composition______________ 9 Evidence from mineralogical composition __________ 30 Atate clay on volcanic rocks _ _ _ _ 9 Soils on volcanic rocks_______________________ 30 Asan clay on volcanic rocks_____ 11 Soils on limestones__________________________ 32 Guam clay on limestones _______ 11 Comparison of soils of Guam with those of similar pa­ Fossil red latosol_____________ 11 rentage in other selected areas______________________ 36 Chacha clay on limestone_______ 11 Volcanic rock soils______________________________ 36 Chemical characteristics--______ 11 Hawaiian Islands___________________________ 36 Free iron oxide________-__________. 11 Norfolk Island_______________________ 36 Ion-exchange capacity______________ 12 Lismore, New South Wales__________________ 38 Organic matter____________________ 13 Inverell, New South Wales_______________ 38 Mineralogical composition__________ 13 Antrim, Northern Ireland__________________ 38 Sand fractions_______________ 13 Soils on limestones______________________________ 39 Clay and silt fractions_________. 18 Conclusions ________________________________________ 40 Soil genesis.__________________________ 24 References.-..______ _______________________________ 41 Evidence from chemical composition. 24 Description of soil profiles, by Carl H. Stensland______ 43 Soils on volcanic parent rocks. _. 24 Soils on volcanic rocks_________________________ 43 Silica removal____________. 27 Soils on limestone__ ___________________________ 48 Alumina accumulation___. 27 Index.________-_-____---_--------_--__---_------__ 51 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Parent rocks of soils on Guam, andesite, basalt, tuffaceous sandstone, and weathered tuff____________________ F4 2. Parent rocks of soils on Guam, pillow basalt-_________-__--_-_-_-___---_---_--_-.------_---------------- 5 3. Localities of soil profiles on Guam_______________________._____-___---_---__--_-_-_---_------_-------- 6 4. Heavy residues of sand fractions of soils on Guam__________-___-___-_-_--__---_-_-_---_-__-----___--_- 16 5. Diagram showing proportion of halloysite to gibbsite and boehmite in the various soil profiles- _____________ 21 6. Differential thermal analyses of clay «2ji) from soils developed on limestones and on volcanic rocks _____ 22 7. Diagram showing percentage of goethite and hematite in the various soil profiles_____-__--__--__---_---_--- 24 8. Chemical composition, recalculated on water-free basis, of profiles of Atate clay and Asan clay on volcanic rocks. 28 9. Diagram showing mineralogical relationships of soils developed on basaltic materials in various localities ____ 33 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, and insoluble residues of limestones from Guam_________-__------_ F2 2. Chemical composition of the volcanic rocks of Guam________-_______-___---___-_---_---_---_----------- 7 3. Mechanical composition and pH 6f soils on volcanic rocks and on limestones-____--_----_-_-_--------------- 8 ni IV CONTENTS Page TABLE 4. Major chemical constituents in samples of soil from 13 soil profiles on Guam________________________________ F10 5. Organic carbon, free iron oxide, and ion-exchange capacity of soils on volcanic rocks and on limestones.________ 12 6. Heavy minerals (sp gr >2.8) in the sand fractions (0.25-0.10 mm and 0.10-0.05 mm) of soils from Guam______ 14 7. Mineralogy of the clay and silt fractions of soils.___-_______-_____---_-_---_---___----__----_____________ 18 8. Interpretation of thermal reactions shown by differential thermal analysis curves in figure 6_-___-___-_____-__ 20 9. Average chemical composition of three groups of volcanic rocks that are parent materials of soils on Guam._ __. 25 10. Average chemical composition (water-free basis) of soil profiles developed on volcanic rocks and on limestones from Guam____________________-_____________-_______-_-___---__---____--__-_--__-_-___--_________ 25 11-15. Chemical composition of parent rock and soil profiles: 11. Atate clay on Alutom Formation (profile S54-4)_______--_-___-----__-_-_____-__-_____________-____ 25 12. Atate clay on Alutom Formation (profile S54-5)____-_--__-__-__-_--_-__--__-_-_____-______________ 26 13. Atate clay on Bolanos Pyroclastic Member of the Umatac Formation (profile S54-6)___________________ 27 14. Atate clay on pillow basalt of the Facpi Volcanic Member of the Umatac Formation (profile S54-12)_____ 27 15. Asan clay on Alutom Formation (profile S54-23) _____ ______________________________________________ 27 16. Normative clay mineral composition, calculated from chemical analyses, of soil profiles on volcanic rocks and on limestones- ----____--__-__-__-_______-_____-__----_---------_------__----.__----____-___---_-_--__- 29 17. Changes in chemical composition of the Guam clay (average), presuming that it developed from material similar to the Chacha clay________--_____________________-_--____-____-__-_____--______-_-_-_________---__ 30 18. Weathering sequence of minerals in rocks and soils of Guam. _____________________________________________ 31 19. Comparison of soils developed on basalt and volcanic ash from various selected localities._____-_________--_-_ 37 GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY OF GUAM, MARIANA ISLANDS MINERALOGY OF SELECTED SOILS FROM GUAM By DOROTHY CARROLL and JOHN C. HATHAWAY ABSTRACT The principal weathering process in the development of the Data are given for the grain-size distribution, pH, chemical Atate clay is the removal of silica and the consequent accumula­ composition, organic carbon, free iron oxide, ion exchange ca­ tion of alumina, iron oxide, and titania. The Guam clay has a pacity, and mineralogy of soil samples from 14 profiles on Guam. more complex genesis as the limestones beneath it vary in their Six of the profiles are developed on limestone and eight on vol­ content of insoluble residue and in the kinds of minerals present. canic rocks. Most of the soils are described as red latosols and In some limestones the residue consists principally of fresh vol­ are clayey. The principal soil overlying volcanic rocks, the canic ash minerals, but in others, soil material from the erosion Atate clay, averages 71 percent clay, 23 percent silt, and 6 per­ of land surfaces is present. cent sand. The principal soil overlying limestone, the Guam The soils developed on volcanic materials on Guam are com­ clay, averages 59 percent clay, 33 percent silt, and 9 percent pared with other lateritic soils and with fossil laterites. Soils sand. In chemical composition the Atate clay averages 35.5 thus compared are from the Hawaiian Islands, Norfolk Island, percent SiO2, 27.9 percent Al20a, 14.5 percent Fe2O3, and 1.0 Australia, and Northern Ireland. The clay minerals of all these percent TiO2. The Guam clay averages 1.4 percent SiO2, 39.1 soils show a progressive change from montmorillonite > percent A12O3, 20.9 percent Fe203, and 2.0 percent TiO2. Com­ halloysite * kaolinite » gibbsite. The Atate clay of Guam parison of the SiO2 percentages for weathered rock and surface is a uniform profile that apparently has not reached the same soil of the Atate clay show that silica has been removed during stage of development as have the older soils of the Hawaiian development of the profile. Alumina and ferric oxide accumulate Islands. The ease of the weathering of the tuffs on Guam that in these soils. contain zeolites and glass suggests that these soils have de­ Normative mineral compositions of representative soil profiles veloped more rapidly than similar soils 011 compact basalts and show that a kaolin mineral, goethite, and a little gibbsite make andesites. The soils overlying limestones are compared with up the bulk of the Atate clay; whereas gibbsite, hematite, and terra rossa type soils of other Pacific islands, the West Indies, a little kaolin mineral are the main "constituents of the Guam and the
Recommended publications
  • Engineering Behavior and Classification of Lateritic Soils in Relation to Soil Genesis Erdil Riza Tuncer Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1976 Engineering behavior and classification of lateritic soils in relation to soil genesis Erdil Riza Tuncer Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Civil Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Tuncer, Erdil Riza, "Engineering behavior and classification of lateritic soils in relation to soil genesis " (1976). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5712. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5712 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrothermal and Metamorphic Berthierine
    n27 CanadianMineralogist Vol. 30,pp. 1127-1142 (1992) HYDROTHERMALAND METAMORPHICBERTHIERINE FROM THE KIDD CREEK VOLCANOGENICMASSTVE SULFIDE DEPOSIT. TIMMINS, ONTARIO JOHNF.SLACK U.S.Geological Survey, Nationnl Center, Mail Stop954, Reston, Virginia 22092, U.S.A. WEI-TEH JIANG ANDDONALD R. PEACOR Depamnent of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A. PATRICKM. OKITA* U.S.Geological Survey, National Center,Mail Stop954, Reston,Virginia 22092,U.S.A. ABSTRACT Berthierine,a 7 A pe-Al memberof the serpentinegroup, occursin the footwall stringerzone of the ArcheanKidd Creek massivesulfide deposit, Ontario, associated with quartz,muscovite, chlorite, pyrite, sphalerite,chalcopyrite, and local tourmaline' cassiterite,and halloysite. Berthierine has been identified by the lack of 14A basalreflections on X-ray powderdiffractionpattems, by its composition (electron-microprobedata), and by transmissionelectron microscopy (TEM). Peoogaphic and scanning eiectronmicroscopic (SEM) studiesreveal different types of berthierineocculrences, including interlayerswithin and rims on deformedchlorite, intergrowthswith muscoviteand halloysite,and discretecoarse grains. TEM imagesshow thick packetsof berthierineand chlorite that are parallel or relatedby low-angle boundaries,and layer terminationsof chlorite by berthierine; mixedJayer chlorite-berthierinealso is observed,intergrown with Fe-rich chlorite and berthierine.End-member (Mg-free) berthierineis presentin small domainsin two samples.The Kidd Creekberthierine is chemicallysimilar
    [Show full text]
  • General Characteristics of Soil| Sample Answer
    General Characteristics of Soil| sample answer Q: ‘Examine the general composition and characteristics of any one soil type that you have studied’ (2007 Q17) Latosol- A tropical zonal soil. 3 aspects will be discussed. 1. Composition: Soil is composed of a number of ingredients/components. These components can vary in portion. All soils form as result of the action of several factors. THese factors combine to influence the many processes at work in soil formation eg. Leaching and weathering. These give soil its own characteristics. Soil is composed of number of ingredients and constituents. The components of soil are mixed in different quantities to create different soil types. They are made up of mineral matter, air, water, humus, living organisms. However, climate is the single most important factor in determining what a soil will be like as climate influences vegetation, the rate of weathering and soil, forming processing in an area. The majority of soil is composed of mineral matter. Mineral matter are rock particles from the bedrock and weathered rock. The soil type varies depending on mineral matter. Unconsolidated material eg boulder clay will help form soil more rapidly than solid bedrock as it is partly weathered. Soil is also composed of organic matter. Organic matter includes decaying plants and animals which bacteria and fungi breakdown. Humus is a dark brown jelly-like substance formed from organic matter. Living organisms are also included in ‘organic matter’, earthworms, beetles, fungi, bacteria; they digest organic matter to humus and also mix and create soil. Water is another important component of soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Soils - Willy Verheye, Diego De La Rosa
    LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL SCIENCES – Vol. VII – Mediterranean Soils - Willy Verheye, Diego de la Rosa MEDITERRANEAN SOILS Willy Verheye National Science Foundation Flanders/Belgium and Geography Department, University Gent, Belgium Diego de la Rosa Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Scientificas, Sevilla, Spain Keywords: Calcium carbonate, decalcification, Luvisol, Mediterranean, pedogenesis, soil classification, Terra Rossa, Xeralf, xeric moisture regime Contents 1. Introduction 2. Soil Forming Factors 2.1 Climate 2.2 Parent Material 2.3 Time 2.4 Topography 2.5 Biological Activity and Man 3. Pedogenesis and Profile Development 3.1 Pedogenesis on Carbonaceous Rocks 3.2 Pedogenesis on Non-Carbonaceous Rocks 4. Classification 4.1. USDA Soil Taxonomy 4.2 World Soil Reference Base for Soil Resources 4.3 French CPCS Classification 5. Land Use and Production Potential 5.1 Crop Production 5.2 Extensive Grazing Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography BiographicalUNESCO Sketches – EOLSS Summary Mediterranean SAMPLEsoils are soils which form underCHAPTERS a Mediterranean climate. They are variously called Terra Rossa (on hard limestone) and Red Mediterranean Soils. Not all soils in a Mediterranean environment are, however, qualified as such because normal pedogenetic development may be hampered by erosion (rejuvenation of the profile), lack of time, and lack of water or unfavorable parent material characteristics. The impact of climate, topography, parent material (mineralogical composition, coherence and permeability), time and human influence as soil forming factors is discussed. Pedogenesis is reviewed and three phases in a color sequence are recognized, ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL SCIENCES – Vol. VII – Mediterranean Soils - Willy Verheye, Diego de la Rosa with a major focus on soils developed over carbonaceous substrata.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability of Superparamagnetic Minerals in Soils and Rocks 0.5Ex
    Stability of superparamagnetic minerals in soils and rocks Can frequency-dependent susceptibility be used as a proxy for climate in the past? Jan Igel1, Holger Preetz1;2 & Christian Rolf1 1Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics, Hannover, Germany Leibniz Institute for 2OFD Niedersachsen, Federal Competence Center for Soil and Applied Geophysics Groundwater Protection / UXO Clearance, Hannover, Germany Motivation Results & Interpretation I Frequency-dependent (FD) magnetic susceptibility is a property of I Samples treated with oxygen free water and samples treated superparamagnetic (SP) minerals. The presence of these minerals with sodium sulphide (shown here) show similar results. in soils and sediments is commonly attributed to neoformation Magnetic susceptibility during weathering and pedogenesis. 55000 Warm and humid conditions give rise to neoformation of SP mi- 50000 I Rocks: after dithionite 45000 reduction experiment Tuff nerals and thus frequency-dependent susceptibility is often used as treatment Tephra palaeoclimate proxy in sediment stratigraphy. Rhyolite SI] 40000 6 − I SP minerals can also be of lithogenic origin and occur in magmatic [10 Soils: LF rocks and volcanic ashes. However, a lithogenic origin is commonly κ ≈ Luvisol Humous loess 10000 Laterite neglected in palaeoclimatic studies. Terra Rossa I Pedogenic SP minerals are assumed to be less stable than lithoge- 5000 nic SP minerals. 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 time [days] Materials I No decrease of κLF or ∆κ in reducing environment ! SP minerals stable regardless of their origin (lith./ped.) A number of 7 samples with high I Some soils show increase of κLF and ∆κ during reduction content of SP minerals were in- ! neoformation of SP minerals due to bacterial activity vestigated.
    [Show full text]
  • DOGAMI MP-20, Investigations of Nickel in Oregon
    0 C\1 a: w a.. <( a.. en ::::> 0 w z <( __j __j w () en � INVESTIGATIONS OF NICKEL IN OREGON STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOL.OGY AND MINERAL. IN OUSTRIES DONAL.D .A HUL.L. STATE GEOLOGIST 1978 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES 1069 State Office Building, Portland, Oregon 97201 MISCELLANEOUS PAPER 20 INVESTIGATIONS OF NICKEL IN OREGON Len Ramp, Resident Geologist Grants Pass Field Office Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Conducted in conformance with ORS 516.030 . •. 5 1978 GOVERNING BOARD Leeanne MacColl, Chairperson, Portland Talent Robert W. Doty STATE GEOLOGIST John Schwabe Portland Donald A. Hull CONTENTS INTRODUCTION -- - ---- -- -- --- Purpose and Scope of this Report Acknowledgments U.S. Nickel Industry GEOLOGY OF LATERITE DEPOSITS - -- - 3 Previous Work - - - - --- 3 Ultramafic Rocks - ----- --- 3 Composition - - -------- - 3 Distribution ------ - - - 3 Structure - 3 Geochemistry of Nickel ---- 4 Chemical Weathering of Peridotite - - 4 The soi I profile ------- 5 M i nero I ogy -- - ----- 5 Prospecting Guides and Techniques- - 6 OTHER TYPES OF NICKEL DEPOSITS - - 7 Nickel Sulfide Deposits- - - - - - 7 Deposits in Oregon 7 Other areas --- 8 Prospecting techniques 8 Silica-Carbonate Deposits - -- 8 DISTRIBUTION OF LATERITE DEPOSITS - ------ 9 Nickel Mountain Deposits - - ------ --------- 9 Location --------------- --- 9 Geology - ------- ----- 11 Ore deposits ----------- - -- 11 Soil mineralogy - ------- 12 Structure --- ---- ---- 13 Mining and metallurgy ------------ ---- 13 Production-
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Terra Rossa in the Mediterranean Region: Parent Materials, Composition and Origin
    Geologia Croatica 56/1 83–100 23 Figs. 6 Tabs. ZAGREB 2003 Terra Rossa in the Mediterranean Region: Parent Materials, Composition and Origin Goran DURN Key words: Terra rossa, Parent materials, Composi- relict soil formed during the Tertiary and/or hot and humid periods of the Quaternary. However, some recent investigation in the Atlantic tion, Origin, Mediterranean region. coastal region of Morocco (BRONGER & SEDOV, 2002) show that at least some terra rossa previously referred to as polygenetic relict soils should be regarded as Vetusols. In some isolated karst terrain, terra Abstract rossa may have formed exclusively from the insoluble residue of lime- In the past, the term “terra rossa” became quite a common indication stone and dolomite but much more often it comprises a span of parent for all limestone derived red soils in the Mediterranean region. Today, materials including, for example, aaeolian dust, volcanic material or in some classification systems based on the Mediterranean climate as sedimentary clastic rocks which were derived on carbonate terrain via the major soil differentiating criterion, the term terra rossa is used as a different transport mechanisms. BOERO & SCHWERTMANN (1989) name for the soil subclass “Modal Fersiallitic Red soil” when situated concluded that it is of little relevance for the process of rubification on limestones (DUCHAUFOUR, 1982). However, several national whether the primary Fe sources are autochthonous or allochthonous as soil classifications (e.g. Croatian, Italian, Israeli) retained the term long as the general pedoenvironment remains essentially suitable for “terra rossa” for the hard limestone derived red soils. The nature and the formation of terra rossa.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Afforestation on Soil Structure Formation in Two Climatic Regions Of
    JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 61, 2015 (5): 225–234 doi: 10.17221/6/2015-JFS Eff ects of aff orestation on soil structure formation in two climatic regions of the Czech Republic V. Podrázský1, O. Holubík2, J. Vopravil2, T. Khel2, W.K. Moser3, H. Prknová1 1Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 2Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Soil Science and Soil Conservation, Prague-Zbraslav, Czech Republic 3U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of agricultural land afforestation on soil characteristics. Two sites in two regions of the Czech Republic were evaluated, at lower as well as higher submountain elevations: in the regions of the Orlické hory Mts. and Kostelec nad Černými lesy, afforested, arable and pasture lands were com- pared for basic chemical and physical characteristics. It was determined: pH, CEC, exchangeable nutrients, SOC, bulk density, volume density, porosity (differentiated by pore size), water conductivity and soil aggregate stability. This study demonstrated the important influence of previous land use upon soil characteristics. The characteristics of the arable horizon can persist for many years; in forests, the mineral horizons (15–30 cm) can persist within 15–30 years after afforestation. Afforestation, which caused an increase in soil porosity by decreasing reduced bulk density and increasing capillary and gravitational pores (increasing the water-holding capacity and soil air capacity), is important for maintaining the soil stability. The positive effect on infiltration and retention capacity resulted not only from the presence of a forest overstorey, but also from the presence of permanent grass cover of pasture land.
    [Show full text]
  • Far-Infrared Spectra of Hydrous Silicates at Low Temperatures Providing Laboratory Data for Herschel and ALMA
    A&A 492, 117–125 (2008) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810312 & c ESO 2008 Astrophysics Far-infrared spectra of hydrous silicates at low temperatures Providing laboratory data for Herschel and ALMA H. Mutschke1,S.Zeidler1, Th. Posch2, F. Kerschbaum2, A. Baier2, and Th. Henning3 1 Astrophysikalisches Institut, Schillergässchen 2-3, 07745 Jena, Germany e-mail: [mutschke;sz]@astro.uni-jena.de 2 Institut für Astronomie, Türkenschanzstraße 17, 1180 Wien, Austria e-mail: [email protected] 3 Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie (MPIA), Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Received 2 June 2008 / Accepted 4 September 2008 ABSTRACT Context. Hydrous silicates occur in various cosmic environments, and are among the minerals with the most pronounced bands in the far infrared (FIR) spectral region. Given that Herschel and ALMA will open up new possibilities for astronomical FIR and sub-mm spectroscopy, data characterizing the dielectric properties of these materials at long wavelengths are desirable. Aims. We aimed at examining the FIR spectra of talc, picrolite, montmorillonite, and chamosite, which belong to four different groups of phyllosilicates. We tabulated positions and band widths of the FIR bands of these minerals depending on the dust temperature. Methods. By means of powder transmission spectroscopy, spectra of the examined materials were measured in the wavelength range 25−500 μm at temperatures of 300, 200, 100, and 10 K. Results. Room-temperature measurements yield the following results. For talc, a previously unknown band, centered at 98.5 μm, was found, in addition to bands at 56.5 and 59.5 μm.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Notes on Terra Rossa and Related Soils Near Kfar Hahoresh Archaeological Site, Israel
    Further notes on terra rossa and related soils near Kfar HaHoresh archaeological site, Israel Tsatskin A., Gendler T.S. in Zdruli P. (ed.), Steduto P. (ed.), Kapur S. (ed.). 7. International meeting on Soils with Mediterranean Type of Climate (selected papers) Bari : CIHEAM Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 50 2002 pages 109-120 Article available on line / Article disponible en ligne à l’adresse : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?IDPDF=4002024 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To cite this article / Pour citer cet article -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tsatskin A., Gendler T.S. Further notes on terra rossa and related soils near Kfar HaHoresh archaeological site, Israel. In : Zdruli P. (ed.), Steduto P. (ed.), Kapur S. (ed.). 7. International meeting on Soils with Mediterranean Type of Climate (selected papers). Bari : CIHEAM, 2002. p. 109-120 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 50) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • On the Relation of Chamosite and Daphnite to the Chlorite Group. 1 (With Plates XVIII and XIX.) by A
    441 On the relation of chamosite and daphnite to the chlorite group. 1 (With Plates XVIII and XIX.) By A. F. HXLLIMOSD, M.A., Sc.D. Assistant Curator, Museum of Practical Geology, London. With chemical analyses by C. O. HARVEY, B.Sc., A.R.C.S. and X-ray measurements by F. A. BANNISTER, M.A. [Read June 9, 1938.] I. INTRODUCTION. HERE is a close optical and chemical resemblance between chamo- T site, the chloritic mineral of the bedded ironstones, and daphnite, a low-temperature vein-chlorite common in some of the Cornish tin mines. New material has made it possible to undertake a fresh com- parison of the two minerals: chemical analyses have been made by Mr. C. O. Harvey, chemist to H.M. Geological Survey, and a report on the X-ray measurements is contributed by Mr. F. A. Bannister, of the Mineral Department of the British Museum. The new analysis of chamosite agrees with the simple formula pre- viously assigned: X-ray examination of material from several localities has now established the distinctive crystalline nature of this fine-grained mineral, which differs structurally from ordinary chlorites such as clinochlore. Daphnite, on the other hand, has the ordinary chlorite structure, but the new analysis hilly confirms Tschermak's original opinion that it cannot be represented chemically as a mixture of serpen- tine and amesite. In attempting a comparison with chlorite analyses already published, great difficulty arises from the confused nomenclature. In order to ascertain the nearest chemically allied chlorites to those under dis- cussion, a representative number of selected chlorite analyses have been plotted on a diagram with co-ordinates proportional to R2Oa/SiO2 and RO/Si02.
    [Show full text]