Turkish Studies Volume 14 Issue 1, 2019, P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Turkish Studies Volume 14 Issue 1, 2019, P Turkish Studies Volume 14 Issue 1, 2019, p. 495-509 DOI: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.14907 ISSN: 1308-2140 Skopje/MACEDONIA-Ankara/TURKEY Research Article / Araştırma Makalesi A r t i c l e I n f o / M a k a l e B i l g i s i Received/Geliş: Ocak 2019 Accepted/Kabul: Şubat 2019 Referees/Hakemler: Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ziya POLAT – Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Efe DURMUŞ This article was checked by iThenticate. NUREDDİN MAHMUD ZENGİ’NİN KUZEY SINIRINDAKİ MÜSLÜMAN DEVLETLERLE İLİŞKİLERİ (1146-1174) Ahmet KÜTÜK* ÖZET İmadüddin Zengi’nin ölümünden sonra Haleb ve Musul olarak iki ana şubeye ayrılan Zengi Atabeyliği, Haleb hâkimi Nureddin Mahmud Zengi’nin akıllı idaresi ve cesareti sayesinde bir asır daha bu bölgede varlığını güçlü bir şekilde sürdürmüştür. Nureddin, babasının ölümünü fırsat bilerek Suriye ve el-Cezire topraklarına girmeye çalışan rakipleriyle giriştiği egemenlik mücadelesini kazanarak ülkesine yönelen tüm tehditleri bertaraf etmeyi başarmıştır. Öncelikle kuzey sınırında Haçlıları işlevsiz hale getirdikten sonra bölgeye egemen olmaya çalışan Selçuklu ve Artuklu gibi Müslüman devletlere karşı hassas bir politika takip etmek zorunda kalmıştır. Bölgedeki en ciddi rakibi Selçuklulara karşı gerek I. Mesud gerekse onun oğlu II. Kılıç Arslan zamanında işlevsel bir politika takip ederek bu devletin Anadolu’nun doğusuna ve el-Cezire bölgesine sarkmasını engellemiştir. Özellikle II. Kılıç Arslan ile döneminde Selçuklularla sık sık karşı karşıya gelen Nureddin, onun Danişmend coğrafyası üzerindeki uzak hedefleri önünde en büyük engel olmuştur. Bununla birlikte Nureddin, kuzey sınırındaki Müslüman devletlerle ilişkilerini tamamiyle bir düşmanlık politikası üzerine tesis etmemiş, aynı bölgede faaliyet gösteren gayr-ı müslim devletlere karşı ittifak kurmak için zaman zaman tolere edilebilecek bir rekabet politikası takip etmiştir. Bu makalede kaynaklarda yer alan bilgiler üzerinden Nureddin’in, kuzey sınırına yerleşen Müslüman devletlerle giriştiği hâkimiyet mücadelesi anlatılmaya çalışılacak ve onun yaklaşık 30 yıllık saltanat süresi boyunca bölgede takip ettiği siyasetin esasları ortaya konmaya çalışılacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Nureddin Mahmud Zengi, I. Mesud, II. Kılıç Arslan, Timur-taş, Fahreddin Kara Arslan * Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Mardin Artuklu Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Tarih Bölümü, E-posta: [email protected] 496 Ahmet KÜTÜK NUR AL-DIN MAHMUD ZANKI’S RELATIONS WITH ISLAMIC STATES IN HIS NORTHERN FRONTIER (1146-1174) ABSTRACT Zangids which is divided into two main branches as Haleb and Mosul after İmad-al-Din Zanki’s death, thanks to the ruler of Haleb Nur al-Din’s intelligent management and courage, remained in the region spiritedly for another century. Nur al-Din managed to eliminate all threats to his country by winning the sovereignty struggle with his opponents who tried to enter Syria and al-Jazeera with the opportunity of his father's death. Firstly he made Crusaders dysfunctional on the northern border and afterwards he had to pursue a sensitive policy towards Islamic states like Saldjukids and Artukids. Against the most serious opponent the Saldjukids, both in the time of Mesud I and his son Kilidj Arslan II, he followed a functional policy that prevented them in east of Anatolia and Al-Jazeera. Especially in the period of Kilidj Arslan, Nureddin often came across with Saldjukids in Danishmendids territory and he was the biggest obstacle to his distant targets regarding this region. Nevertheless, Nureddin did not establish his relations with Muslim states on the northern border on a purely hostile policy. He followed a competitive policy that could be tolerated from time to time to form an alliance against the non-Muslim states operating in the same region. In this article, it will be tried to explain Nureddin's struggle for dominance with the Islamic states on the northern border and during the 30 years of his reign, the principles of the politics he pursued against Muslim states will be put forward. STRUCTURED ABSTRACT The Zangids whose rule modestly began in Mosul and expanded in short time through the policies of Imad al-Din Zanki were initially expected to die out after his sudden death. But this state turned into a power holding together the realms of Syria, Egypt, Anatolia and Iraq via the brave moves of his successor Nur al-Din Mahmud. Although Nur al- Din was resolved to fight against the Crusaders throughout the important part of his reign, Christian states of the northern border were not the only rivals of Nur al-Din. He did not neglect to struggle with Muslim states to prevent the formation of a political intervention against himself when the necessity arose. Thus, during his reign Nur al- Din was engaged in political struggles with the Muslim states for regional dominance. In this context he developed an efficient policy against his northern neighbors, the Artukids and the Saldjukids and the same policy was kept up by his successor Saladin his successor. The Artukids were one of his rivals along the northern frontier. In this period Qara Arslan (1144-1167), the grandson of Sokman, dominated Hısnkeyfa and Timurtash, son of Ilghazi, ruled in Mardin. After Imad al din Zanki’s death in 1146 these noblemen began to hope for the recovery of their former territories that he had captured. Within this framework, Qara Arslan attacked Tur Abidin in the same year and despite great losses he succeeded to capture it. Likewise, in 1147 Timurtash tried to capture Dara which happened to be very close to his Turkish Studies Volume 14 Issue 1, 2019 Nureddin Mahmud Zengi’nin Kuzey Sınırındaki Müslüman Devletlerle İlişkileri 497 own domain. During these years, Nur al-Din was not closely interested in these regional developments as he was invested against the Crusader Principality of Antioch. But these the Artukid attempts in the region were followed by his brother Sayf al-Din Ghazi, the ruler of Mosul. In the 1160’s Nur al-Din focused on the Crusaders and the Saldjukids in the northwest frontier region but he did not attempt against the Muslim states in the northeast as long as they obeyed him. But he took care of choosing the new ruler when one of princes in that region died. The Saldjukids were doubtlessly the most compelling rival for Nur al-Din in the north apart from the Crusaders. According to the sources the Saldjukids made a systematic policy of spreading towards the east during the reigns of Masud I and his son Kilidj Arslan. Nur al-Din sometimes used the Byzantines and even the Crusaders as an element of equilibrium against the Saldjukids. He therefore prevented them from dominating eastern Anatolia and the al-Jazirah. In this period the Saldjukids focused on obtaining Malatya which the Danishmendis ruled and then the other important cities to the east like Marash, Albistan, Kaysun, Tell-Bashir which were under the rule of the Crusaders. Mesud was especially keen on capturing Malatya which was included within the Saldjukid rule at his father’s time (Kilidj Arslan I). But in the earlier parts of his reign both the troubles in Byzantine frontier and existence of Emir Ghazi, the powerful ruler of the Danishmendids, blocked him from spreading further east. Notwithstanding he did not neglect to follow closely the political developments in the region so as to interfere under favorable circumstances. He wanted to have a say not only in the Danishmendids realm but also in the Artukids region. He therefore was not uninterested with the political developments in the region. Nur al- Din who was troubled by the approach of the Saldjukids to the Jazirah came against them in the region frequently. For example, when Masud besieged Tall-Bashir in 1150, Nur al-Din confronted him at once in order to defend his domain. In 1155 Masud’s death changed the political circumstances in the region. His successor Kilidj Arslan II had to combat with his brothers for the sultanate. Taking advantage of sultanate fights in the Saldjukid capital, Nur al-Din attacked the Saldjukid lands. According to Ibn al Qalanisi, Nur al- Din went down to Asia Minor in 1155. Kilidj Arslan turned his face to the east right after establishing his authority and he primarily came to realize the policy of conquest of the Danishmendid region. During all his reign Nur al-Din had to take measures in this region against the greedy policies of Izz al din Masud and his son Kilidj Arslan. So he pursued a policy against Saldjukids’ enlargement of the Danishmendid territory. The relations of the Zangids and the Saldjukids were tense between 1160-1162. Indeed the principalities of the region that were troubled by Kilidj Arslan’s expansion activities toward the east formed a powerful alliance against him under the leadership of Nur al- Din. Byzantine emperor was also included this alliance. In 1164-1165 a violent conflict between parties took place because of the Saldjukid greedy politics in the Danishmendid realm. Nur al-Din and Kilidj Arslan got ready for battle. But at the last moment Salih b. Ruzzik the Fatimid vizier intervened and prevented the battle. Kilidj Arslan made it a matter of pride to take over Malatya which his father had tried so hard to capture. Nur al-Din was especially concerned to keep Malatya and its environs under the Danishmendid control. He must have considered Turkish Studies Volume 14 Issue 1, 2019 498 Ahmet KÜTÜK that the Danishmendid dominance in this region was preferable to the Saldjukid. He clearly preferred the existence of a weak Danishmendid rule in his northern frontier rather than a powerful Saldjukid neighbor. Nur al-Din continued to fight with the Saldjukids until the end of his life in the region in order to hinder any and every political development against himself. In 1174 he made some preparations to march against the Principality of Antioch and the Saldjukids which happened to be his two important rivals in northern frontier.
Recommended publications
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-62093-2 - The Cambridge History of Turkey: Byzantium to Turkey, 1071–1453: Volume 1 Edited by Kate Fleet Frontmatter More information the cambridge history of TURKEY * Volume I of The Cambridge History of Turkey examines the rise of Turkish power in Anatolia from the arrival of the first Turks at the end of the eleventh century to the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453. Taking the period as a whole, rather than dividing it along the more usual pre-Ottoman/Ottoman fault line, the volume covers the political, economic, social, intellectual and cultural history of the region as the Byzantine Empire crumbled and Anatolia passed into Turkish control to become the heartland of the Ottoman Empire. In this way,the contributors to the volume engagewithandemphasisethecontinuitiesoftheeraratherthanits dislocations, situating Anatolia within its geographic context at the crossroads of Central Asia, the Middle East and the Mediterranean. The world which emerges is one of military encounter, but also of cultural co-habitation, intellectual and diplomatic exchange, and political finesse. This is a state-of-the-art work of reference on an understudied period in Turkish history by some of the leading scholars in the field. kate fleet is Director of the Skilliter Centre for Ottoman Stud- ies, Newnham College, Cambridge, and Newton Trust Lecturer in Ottoman History at the Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, Cambridge University. Her previous publications include European and Islamic Trade in the Early
    [Show full text]
  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dali
    T.C. SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI TÜRKİYE SELÇUKLU DEVLETİ VE DÂNİŞMENDLİ BEYLİĞİ ARASINDAKİ ASKERİ, SİYASİ VE SOSYAL İLİŞKİLER (1092-1178) Esra ÇEÇEN 1130204013 YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ DANIŞMAN Yrd.Doç.Dr.Abdullah BAKIR ISPARTA-2017 ii iii ÖZET (ÇEÇEN, Esra, Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti ve Dânişmendli Beyliği Arasındaki Askeri, Siyasi ve Sosyal İlişkiler (1092-1178), Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta, 2017) Malazgirt Savaşı’nın kazanılmasından sonra Anadolu’ya gelen Dânişmend Gazi tarafından kurulan Dânişmendli Beyliği ile Alp Arslan’ın ölümüyle birlikte Anadolu’ya gelen Kutalmışoğlu Süleymanşah’ın kurduğu Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti zamanla bulundukları bölgelerde çok büyük bir güce kavuşmuşlardır. Bu iki Türk hanedanlığı Anadolu’nun Türkleşmesinde çok önemli bir rol oynamış olup, bu dönemde Türkistan’dan gelen Türkmenler Anadolu’ya yerleştirilerek Anadolu’nun bir Türk yurdu olması sağlanmıştır. Bu iki Türk hanedanlığının yaptıkları fetih hareketleri Bizans’ın bölgedeki egemenliğini tehdit etmeye başlayınca, Bizans, Türkleri Anadolu’dan atmak amacıyla Avrupa’dan yardım istemek zorunda kalmıştır. Ancak Bizans’ın bu yardım isteği, papalığın kendi çıkarları doğrultusunda hareket etmesi ile birlikte haçlı seferlerine dönüşmüştür. 1097 yılında meydana gelen haçlı seferi neticesinde Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti, başkenti İznik’i kaybetmesinin ardından ittifak kurduğu Dânişmendliler ile birlikte haçlılara karşı mücadele ettikleri Dorylaion Savaşı’nda da başarıya ulaşamamıştır. Bu haçlı seferi neticesinde haçlılar; Dük Godefroi de Bouillon’nun kurduğu Kudüs Krallığı’na (1099-1187); Baudouin de Boulogne’nin kurduğu Urfa Haçlı Kontluğu’na (1098-1146); Bohemund’un kurduğu Antakya Haçlı Kontluğu’na (1098-1268) ve Kont Raymond de Saint Gilles’in kurduğu Trablusşam Kontluğu’na (1102-1288) sahip olmuşlardır. 1097 Yılı Haçlı Seferi’nin yaraları Anadolu’da henüz sarılmadan Anadolu’ya yeni haçlı orduları gelmeye başlamıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Sultan Şahinşâh (Melikşâh) Devri Türkiye Selçuklu Tarihi (H
    SULTAN ŞAHİNŞÂH (MELİKŞÂH) DEVRİ TÜRKİYE SELÇUKLU TARİHİ (H. 503-510/M. 1110-1116) HAZIRLAYAN Arda DENİZ DANIŞMAN Selim KAYA AFYONKARAHİSAR 2015 T.C. AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ SULTAN ŞAHİNŞÂH (MELİKŞÂH) DEVRİ TÜRKİYE SELÇUKLU TARİHİ (503-510/1110-1116) Hazırlayan Arda DENİZ Danışman Yrd. Doç. Dr. Selim KAYA AFYONKARAHİSAR 2015 ii YEMİN METNİ Yüksek Lisans Tezi olarak sunduğum: SULTAN ŞAHİNŞÂH (MELİKŞÂH) DEVRİ TÜRKİYE SELÇUKLU TARİHİ (503-510/1110-1116) adlı çalışmamın, tarafımdan bilimsel ahlâk ve geleneklere aykırı düşecek bir yardıma başvurmaksızın yazıldığını ve yararlandığım eserlerin Kaynakça (Bibliyografya)’da gösterilen eserlerden oluştuğunu, bunlara atıf yapılarak yararlanmış olduğumu belirtir ve bunu onurumla doğrularım. 18.12.2015 Arda DENİZ TEZ JÜRİSİ KARARI VE ENSTİTÜ MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ ONAYI JÜRİ ÜYELERİ İMZA Tez Danışmanı: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Selim KAYA ……………………………. Doç. Dr. Muharrem KESİK ……………………………. Yrd. Doç. Dr. İbrahim BALIK .....………………...………. Tarih Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Öğrencisi Arda DENİZ’in, “SULTAN ŞAHİNŞÂH (MELİKŞÂH) DEVRİ TÜRKİYE SELÇUKLU TARİHİ 503- 510/1110-1116” başlıklı tezi.....…/….…/….…/tarihinde, saat…………….’da Lisans Üstü Eğitim Öğretim ve Sınav Yönetmeliği’nin ilgili maddeleri uyarınca, yukarıda isim ve imzaları bulunan jüri üyeleri tarafından değerlendirilerek kabul edilmiştir. Prof. Dr. Ahmet YARAMIŞ MÜDÜR ÖZET SULTAN ŞAHİNŞÂH (MELİKŞÂH) DEVRİ TÜRKİYE SELÇUKLU TARİHİ (H. 503-510/M. 1110-1116) Arda DENİZ AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANA BİLİM DALI Aralık 2015 Danışman: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Selim KAYA Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti’nin en önemli sultanlarından biri olan Şahinşâh (Melikşâh), devletin duraklama ve buhran döneminde tarihi bir rol üstlenerek, merkezî otoritenin yeniden sağlanmasına, hattâ güçlenerek toparlanmasına vesile olmuş bir hükümdârdır. Şahinşâh (Melikşâh), cesur, akıllı, yiğit, çalışkan, ama aynı zamanda şanssız bir sultandır.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenians in the History of Turks Basic Text Book
    TIIE RECTORATE OF THE KARS KAFKAS UNIVERSITY, PUBLICATION NO: 22 Armenians in the History of Turks Basic Text Book Prof. Dr. Azmi Süslü Prof. Dr. Fahrettin KIRZIOGLU Prof. Dr. Refet YİNANÇ Prof. Dr. Yusuf HALLAÇOĞLU f $ PART ONE THE RULERS OF UP LANDS /URARTU/ARMENIA 1 1.1 FROM THE ARRIVAL OF CIMMERIANS TO THE SOVEREIGNTY OF PERSIANS (714-950 B.C.) 5 1.1.1. Proto Turk Kipchak Cimmers 5 1.1.2. The Arrival of Sycthians and Their Sovereignty in Near Asia (680-626 B.C.) 9 1.1.3. The Site And Tribe Names That Remained From The Sycthian Torcom/Torcomian/Turkomen/Oğuz Tribes 17 1.2. FROM PERSIAN TO SMALL ARSACIDES (550 B.C.. 51 A.D.) 24 1.2.1. The Usage of “Armenia" Instead of Urartu In the Persian Period, the “Armenians”, and the Tribes that have been seen by Xenophon betw een Mosul and Trabzon 24 1.2.2. Macedonian and Artaxians. Armenia/Up-Lands. Bulgar- Vanand and Balkars in the Roman-Arsacide Rivalry 29 All rights reserved. Under the law no 5846 this work ma\ not be 1.3.FROM SMALL-ARSACIDES TO ISLAM'S SOVEREIGNTY 33 translated 01 copied in whole or in part without the (w ritten) permission of 1.3.1. The frontier Princedom of Parthian Small Arsacidcs 33 Prof. Dr. Azmi Süslü. 1.3.2. Mannk-Konak Brothers (The Fathers of Karakuvunli) Christianity and Kamsarakanians (Kulbaşcs) 41 Prof Dr. Azmı Süslü 1.3.3. Mamikonians Religious Fight with Sassanians: The New' Turkish Tribes From North; The Invasion of Byzantine-Last Sassanians; “Armenia’’ Satraps.
    [Show full text]
  • Yeditepe University Faculty of Arts and Sciences
    YEDİTEPE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES UNDERGRADUATE HISTORY PROGRAMME INFORMATION PACKET (2017) History: Founded in 1997.a Qualification Awarded: The Bachelor’s Degree in History is awarded to the graduates who have successfully completed all courses in the curriculum. Level of Qualification: First Cycle Specific Admission Requirements: The general requirements explained in “General Admission Requirements” of Information on the Institution part are applied for admission of students. Specific Arrangements for Recognition of Prior Learning (Formal, Non-Formal and In-formal): The rules and regulations forn recognition of formal prior learning are well defined. Transfer can be made among the institutions of which equivalency is recognized by Higer Education Council. Also successful vocational school graduates to continue their education to obtain Bachelor’s degrees if they are successful in the selection and the placement examination (DGS, i.e. vertical transfer examination) are admitted. The courses to be taken by these students are determined by the relevant department, on the basis of courses they have completed in the programs from which they have graduated. Recognition of prior non-formal and in-formal learning is at the beginning stage in Turkish Higher Education Institutions. Yeditepe University and hence of the Department is not an exception to this. Qualification Requirements and Regulations: Students must obtain a grade point average of at least 2.00 out of 4.00 and successfully pass all courses on the programme. (equivalent to a total 240 ECTS). Profile of The Programme: The goal of History Programme is to equip the students with the theoretical and practical skills necessary to pursue academic studies, to provide the students with the social scientific skills such as analytical and critical thinking, interdisciplinary and multi-dimensional approach and to educate them to become professionally and socially responsible and ethical individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Myth and Muslim Symbol the Battle of Manzikert Carole Hillenbrand
    Turkish Myth Man of Battle The Myth Turkish and Muslim Symbol The Battle of Manzikert Carole Hillenbrand ‘An important if neglected subject based on wide-ranging and overlooked sources, and wonderfully contextualised and analysed, and well-written and accessible.’ zik Gene Garthwaite, Jane and Ralph Bernstein Professor in Asian Studies, Dartmouth College Muslim Symbol Muslim ert Turks ruled the Middle East for a millennium, and eastern Europe for many centuries, and there is no doubt that they moulded the lands under their dominion. It is therefore something of a paradox that the history of Turkey and aspects of the identity and role of the Turks, both as Muslims and as an ethnic group, still remain little known in the west and undervalued in the Arabic and Persian-speaking worlds. This book contributes to historical scholarship on Turkey by focusing on the country’s key foundational myth, the battle of Manzikert in 1071 – the Turkish equivalent of the battle of Hastings – which destroyed the hold of Christian Byzantium on eastern Turkey and opened the whole country to the spread of Islam. This process was completed with the fall of Constantinople and Trebizond some four centuries later. Carole H Translations and a close analysis of many of the extant Muslim sources – Arabic and Persian – which deal with the battle of Manzikert are provided in the book. The author also looks at these writings as literary works and vehicles of religious Turkish Myth ideology and analyses the ongoing confrontation between the Muslim Turks and Christian Europe and the importance of Manzikert in the formation of the modern ill state of Turkey since 1923.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Mesut Dönemi Türkiye Selçuklulari-Danişmendli Ilişkileri1
    Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (ASEAD) Eurasian Journal of Researches in Social and Economics (EJRSE) ISSN:2148-9963 www.asead.com I. MESUT DÖNEMİ TÜRKİYE SELÇUKLULARI-DANİŞMENDLİ İLİŞKİLERİ1 Pelin AYDOĞDU ÇOLAK2 ÖZET Malazgirt zaferinin ardından Anadolu’da kurulan Danişmendli Beyliği ve Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti kısa zamanda bölgede büyük bir güce kavuşmuşlardır. İki Türk hanedanlığı da Anadolu’nun Türk yurdu haline gelmesinde büyük rol oynamıştır. Bu iki Türk hanedanlığının Anadolu’daki faaliyetlerinden rahatsız olan Bizans Avrupa’dan yardım istemiştir. Papa, Bizans’ın bu yardım talebini kendi çıkarları doğrultusunda kullanarak İslam alemine karşı Haçlı Seferleri düzenlemesine ön ayak olmuştur. Avrupa’dan büyük bir kalabalıkla hareket eden Haçlı ordularına karşı Danişmendli Beyliği ve Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti ittifak yapmışlardır. Ancak bu iki Türk hanedanlığı bir taraftan Haçlılara karşı ittifak yapsalar da bir taraftan da Anadolu hakimiyeti için birbirleriyle de savaşmışlardır. Kimi zaman da akrabalık bağı kurarak aralarındaki ilişkileri güçlendirmişlerdir. Danişmendli Emir Gazi, kızını I. Mesud ile evlendirerek kurduğu bu akrabalık sayesinde Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti’ndeki taht kavgalarına karışmıştır. Fakat Emir Gazi’nin ölümünün ardından I. Mesud Anadolu’da tekrar hakimiyetini sağlamak için uğraşmıştır. Melik Muhammed’in ölümünün ardından ise Danişmendli Beyliği Kayseri, Malatya ve Sivas olmak üzere üç kola ayrılmıştır. Bir daha asla eski gücüne ulaşamayan Danişmendlilerin bu üç kolu da kısa süre sonra Türkiye Selçuklu Devleti tarafından ortadan kaldırılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: I. Mesud, Anadolu Devleti, Anadolu, Danişmendli Beyliği, Bizans I. MASUD PERIOD RELATIONS BETWEEN TURKEY SELJUK STATE AND DANISHMEND PRINCIPALITY ABSTRACT Founded in the aftermath of the Malazgirt victory in Anatolia and Turkey have reached a Danişmendli Principality major power in the region Seljuk State as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-62093-2 - The Cambridge History of Turkey: Byzantium to Turkey, 1071–1453: Volume 1 Edited by Kate Fleet Index More information Index Abaqa Han, Ilkhan ruler (1265–82), 64–73 Agaceri,˘ Mongol commander and emir, 89 death (1282), 73 agriculture, 12, 121 and Karamanid revolt, 70–1 effect of rebellions on, 236–7 and Mesud, 72 effect of Turkoman raids on, 234–7 ‘Abd al-Laif b. ‘Abdallah, mosque in Mardin, means to retain peasants for, 238–9, 258 284 products, 239–40, 370, 372 ‘Abd al-Wajid b. Muhammad, scholar, 300 and Turkish settlement, 370–1 Abdulaziz,¨ Sultan (1861–76), 309 Turkoman view of, 234–40 Abdulhamid¨ II, Sultan (1876–1909), 309 see also pastoralism Abdulkadir¨ b. Gaybi al-Maragi, Maqasid Agrilu, 91 al-Alhan, 321 Ahi Evren, Sufi, 375, 398 Abdullah b. Mahmud, craftsman, 348 and Keramat-i Ahi Evren treatise, 417 ‘A b d ullatif¨ el-Bagd˘ adi,˘ scholar, 414 ahilik, 245, 375, 375n.55 Abdulmecid¨ b. Isma‘il Herevi (d. 1142), 384 ahis (religious artisan brotherhoods), 106, 161, Abdulvahid¨ b. Suleyman,¨ craftsman, 347 187 Abıs¸ga, Mongol commander, 82, 85, 88, 90 beylik of Karaman, 115 Abu al-Fada’il Muhi al-din, poet, 416 and mosque complexes, 297 Abu Ishak al-Thalabi, Qisas al-Ambiya, 410 role in towns, 245 Abu Najb al-Suhrawardi, Sufi mystic, 393 Ahlat, 374 Abu Safi‘id Khudabanda, 272 tomb of Erzen Hatun, 307 Abu Sa‘id, Mongol sultan in Anatolia Ahmad Teguder,¨ Mongol khan (1282–4), 73, (1317–1335), 90, 92, 93, 122, 267 74 Abu Said Bahadur Han, 316 Ahmed III, Ottoman sultan (1703–30), 178 Abusammed b.
    [Show full text]
  • O Poder Do Sultão E O Estado Otomano
    O Poder do Sultão e o Estado Otomano Duarte Serrano Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais Novembro, 2014 Dissertação apresentada para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais, na variante de Relações Internacionais. A tese foi realizada pela orientação científica de: Prof. Doutora, Teresa Ferreira Rodrigues e Prof. Doutor Luís de Sousa. 2 [Declarações] Declaro que esta dissertação é o resultado da minha investigação pessoal e independente. O seu conteúdo é original e todas as fontes consultadas estão devidamente mencionadas no texto, nas notas e na bibliografia. O candidato ------------------------------------- Lisboa, 28 de Outubro 2014 Declaro que esta dissertação se encontra em condições de ser apresentada a provas públicas. Os orientadores -------------------------------------- Lisboa, 28 de Outubro de 2014 3 Aos meus pais, por nunca terem deixado de acreditar em mim 4 Agradecimentos Uma tese para a obtenção de um grau académico é um trabalho individual, no entanto é também fruto de uma recolha de dados para os quais muitos intervenientes deram o seu contributo. É a todos (as) que nos ajudaram nesta empresa que queremos aqui agradecer e que passamos a nomear: aos Professores Teresa Ferreira Rodrigues e Luís de Sousa pelas suas incansáveis revisões e constante apoio para o nosso estudo. Sem as suas observações não teria sido possível a realização desta tese. Ao nosso primo Tiago pelo seu apoio moral, e constante zelo de bibliófilo sempre vigilante em leilões e catálogos, e no próprio arquivo da família, não fosse aparecer alguma obra Otomana. Algumas das obras que citamos são fruto da sua diligência, e o particular dom para encontrar obras raras onde menos se espera.
    [Show full text]
  • And Early Thirteenth-Century Anatolia: Kümbets and the Cross-Cultural Transmission of Architectural Knowledge
    Anahit Galstyan ARMENO-MUSLIM CULTURAL INTERACTIONS IN LATE TWELFTH- AND EARLY THIRTEENTH-CENTURY ANATOLIA: KÜMBETS AND THE CROSS-CULTURAL TRANSMISSION OF ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE MA Thesis in Comparative History, with a specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval Studies. Central European University Budapest November 2017 CEU eTD Collection ARMENO-MUSLIM CULTURAL INTERACTIONS IN LATE TWELFTH- AND EARLY THIRTEENTH-CENTURY ANATOLIA: KÜMBETS AND THE CROSS- CULTURAL TRANSMISSION OF ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE by Anahit Galstyan (Armenia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Comparative History, with a specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection Budapest November 2017 ARMENO-MUSLIM CULTURAL INTERACTIONS IN LATE TWELFTH- AND EARLY THIRTEENTH-CENTURY ANATOLIA: KÜMBETS AND THE CROSS-CULTURAL TRANSMISSION OF ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE by Anahit Galstyan (Armenia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Comparative History, with a specialization in Interdisciplinary Medieval
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Medical History of the Seljuk Era
    TURKISH MEDICAL HISTORY OF THE SELJUK ERA IMPORTANT NOTICE: Author: Prof. Dr. Ali Haydar Bayat Chief Editor: Prof. Dr. Mohamed El-Gomati All rights, including copyright, in the content of this document are owned or controlled for these purposes by FSTC Limited. In Production: Savas Konur accessing these web pages, you agree that you may only download the content for your own personal non-commercial use. You are not permitted to copy, broadcast, download, store (in any medium), transmit, show or play in public, adapt or Release Date: December 2006 change in any way the content of this document for any other purpose whatsoever without the prior written permission of FSTC Publication ID: 621 Limited. Material may not be copied, reproduced, republished, Copyright: © FSTC Limited, 2006 downloaded, posted, broadcast or transmitted in any way except for your own personal non-commercial home use. Any other use requires the prior written permission of FSTC Limited. You agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any of the material contained in this document or use it for any other purpose other than for your personal non-commercial use. FSTC Limited has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published in this document and on the MuslimHeritage.com Web Site were accurate at the time of publication or last modification. Web sites are by nature experimental or constantly changing. Hence information published may be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal opinion of the author. Readers should always verify information with the appropriate references before relying on it.
    [Show full text]
  • Myriokephalon Zaferi Öncesinde Konya'yi Hedef
    USAD, Güz 2017; (7): 40-73 E-ISSN: 2548-0154 MYRİOKEPHALON ZAFERİ ÖNCESİNDE KONYA’YI HEDEF ALAN ASKERÎ SEFERLER VE YOLLARI MILITARY EXPEDITIONS AND THEIR ROUTES TO KONYA PRIOR TO THE MYRIOKEPHALON VICTORY Muharrem KESİK Öz Bizans İmparatorluğu’nun Türkiye Selçuklu Devletine son vermek ve Türkleri Anadolu’dan atmak hedefiyle yola çıktığı seferin sonucunda taraflar arasında meydana gelen Myriokephalon Savaşı’nı Selçuklular kazandılar. Bu zafer Anadolu’nun Türk vatanı olmasını kesin olarak sağlayan büyük bir olaydır. Buna karşın Myriokephalon Zaferi’nin elde edildiği mevkii hâla tam olarak ortaya konulabilmiş değildir. Bu konuda günümüze kadar onlarca makale ve bildiri yazıldı. Ancak bu çalışmaların hiçbiri kamuoyunu ve tarihçileri tatmin edebilmiş değildir. Buradaki ihmal ve sorumluluk Türk Tarih Kurumu ve Kültür Bakanlığı’na aittir. İstanbul’dan yola çıkarak Selçukluların başkenti Konya’ya ulaşmayı hedefleyen İmparator’un Konya’ya giderken seçtiği yol ve savaşın yapıldığı mevki üzerinde yaşanan bu tartışmalar aslında, kaynaklardaki bilgilerin yetersizliği, savaşın geçmiş olduğu coğrafyanın karmaşıklığı, Konya’ya giden birkaç farklı yolun olması, bölgeyi gezip incelemeden yapılan yorumlar, varılan kararlar, tek bir kaynağa dayalı tespitler, savaşın meydana geldiği topografyayı bilmemek gibi nedenlerden kaynaklanmaktadır. Denizli’den Konya’ya gidecek bir ordunun en kolay ve zahmetsiz şekilde gidebileceği yolları değerlendiren tarihçiler, yörede geçiş yolu olarak kullanılan Karamık Beli, Düzbel, Kumdanlı Ovası, Sultandağı, Gelendost, Kufi Çayı vadisi üzerinde durmuşlardır. Aynı zamanda, konu ile ilgili görüş belirten bazı araştırmacıların daha öncekilerden etkilenmesi; savaşın geçtiği yerin Prof. Dr., İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Tarih Bölümü Öğretim Üyesi, [email protected]. 41 | Muharrem KESİK topografik yapısını inceleme fırsatı bulamamaları, metodolojiden bîhaber meraklı bölgesel bazı araştırmacıların ve yazarların ortaya attıkları mesnetsiz iddialar, konunun daha bir karmaşıklaşmasına sebep olmuştur.
    [Show full text]