Cruise Shipping and Urban Development the Case of Venice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cruise Shipping and Urban Development the Case of Venice Cruise Shipping and Urban Development The Case of Venice The city of Venice (Italy) is a major cruise destination. Cruise shipping brings in passengers and their money, but also air pollution, visual impacts and concerns about the lagoon. So does the city ultimately benefi t from this form of maritime tourism, and is the cruise shipping boom Venice has experienced sustainable? This report aims to bring more clarity to these controversial issues by assessing the various impacts cruise shipping has had in Venice. It analyses policies in place and provides recommendations on how to increase the net benefi ts from cruise shipping to Venice. This report is part of the International Transport Forum’s Case-Specifi c Policy Analysis series. These are topical studies on specifi c issues carried out by the ITF in agreement with local institutions. Cruise Shipping and Urban Development The Case of Venice Case-Specific Policy Analysis International Transport Forum 2 rue André Pascal 75775 Paris Cedex 16 France T +33 (0)1 45 24 97 10 F +33 (0)1 45 24 13 22 Email : [email protected] Web: www.itf-oecd.org Potapova/stock.adobe.com /Photo credit: Valerie 2016-06 2016-06-30_ID023_CSPA Venice.indd 1-2 30/06/2016 16:22:50 Cruise Shipping and Urban Development The Case of Venice Case-Specific Policy Analysis The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 57 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the ITF are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the United States. International Transport Forum 2, rue André Pascal F-75775 Paris Cedex 16 [email protected] www.itf-oecd.org Case-Specific Policy Analysis Reports The International Transport Forum’s Case-Specific Policy Analysis series presents topical studies on specific issues carried out by the ITF in agreement with local institutions. This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the International Transport Forum. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of International Transport Forum member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS – 3 Acknowledgements This report forms part of an ITF project on Cruise Shipping and Urban Development, directed by Olaf Merk. It was written by Olaf Merk and Bénédicte Busquet. The report was made possible through a voluntary contribution by the Venice Port Authority and Venice Passenger Terminal. Valuable comments on a draft version of the report were provided by Stephen Perkins, Alain Lumbroso, Liv Gudmundson and Michael Kloth of the ITF. Stefanidaki Evaggelia, Researcher at the University of the Aegean, acted as Peer Reviewer during a study visit to Venice. During this study visit, interviews were conducted with the following stakeholders: Paolo Costa (Venice Port Authority), Nicola Torricella (Venice Port Authority), Claudia Marcolin (Venice Port Authority), Stefano Bonaldo (Venice Port Authority), Alberto Maria Pietrocola (Capitaneria Di Porto de Venezia), Massimo Maiolo (Capitaneria Di Porto de Venezia), Francesco Galietti (CLIA Italy), Salvatore Patti (ARPAV), Federica Montaguti (CISET), Stefano Soriani (Ca’Foscari), Carlo Magnani (Università IUAV di Venezia), Agostino Cappelli (Università IUAV di Venezia), Silvio Testa (Comitato No Grandi Navi), Lidia Fersuoch (Italia Nostra), Luciano Mazzolin (Associazione Ambiente Venezia), Andreina Zitelli (Grupo di Studio Venezia Laguna Porto), Cristiano Chiarot (Gran Teatro La Fenice), Massimo Fioresi (CNA VE), Francesco Mattiazzo (Confesercenti), Filippo Olivetti (Confindustria Venezia), Luigino Rossi (Comitato Italiano per la Salvaguardia di Venezia), Fabio Sacco (Alilaguna), Vicenzo Monaco (Vela), Fabio Gava (SAVE), Davide Calderan (Comitato Cruise Venice), Alessandro Santi (Associazione Agenti Raccomandatari e Mediatori Marittimi del Veneto), Marco Agostini (Comune di Venezia), Roberto Perrochio (Venezia Terminal Passeggeri). CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF VENICE— © OECD/ITF 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS – 5 Table of contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Venice as a cruise port .................................................................................................................................. 9 Cruise port characteristics ............................................................................................................................ 9 Attractiveness of Venice as a cruise port ................................................................................................... 18 Impacts of cruise shipping on the port and city ........................................................................................ 21 Economic impacts: Higher than the European average ............................................................................. 21 Environmental impacts: Emissions and waves .......................................................................................... 22 Traffic impacts: Fairly moderate effects .................................................................................................... 26 When do impacts occur? ............................................................................................................................ 28 Policies .......................................................................................................................................................... 31 Determining the place for cruise shipping in Venice ................................................................................. 31 Tourism and cruise tourism policies in Venice .......................................................................................... 39 Green port policies ..................................................................................................................................... 39 References .................................................................................................................................................... 43 CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF VENICE— © OECD/ITF 2016 6 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary What we did This study aims to assess the impacts of cruise shipping on urban development in the case of the city of Venice, Italy. It was carried out as part of a programme on Cruise Shipping and Urban Development at the International Transport Forum (ITF) at the OECD and benefits from a study visit to Venice and a series of interviews conducted with relevant stakeholders. What we found Venice is one of the world’s success stories with respect to cruise shipping. It is the third largest cruise port in Europe, with 1.7 million cruise passengers in 2014, and Europe’s largest home port, thanks to a very large share (around 90%) of turnaround passengers. The number of cruise passengers is very limited in comparison to the total amount of tourists to Venice: 34 million in 2014 for the province of Venice, which is more than all tourists to the whole of Germany. Venice benefits from unique assets as a destination, first-rate dedicated cruise terminals located in the historical city and great external as well as internal connectivity, via Venice international airport and various urban transport modes. Although passenger numbers have stagnated in recent years, this stagnation is less pronounced than in most other Mediterranean cruise ports, although set to become more substantial due to the uncertainty created by a cruise ship ban in Venice. Cruise shipping generates large economic benefits for the city of Venice. These come in the form of spending of passengers, crew and cruise ships. Passenger spending includes hotels, restaurants, excursions and shopping; crew spending mainly comprises shopping,
Recommended publications
  • MOSE (EXPERIMENTAL ELECTROMECHANICAL MODULE; ITALIAN: MODULO SPERIMENTALE ELETTROMECCANICO) Overview / Summary of the Initiative
    MOSE (EXPERIMENTAL ELECTROMECHANICAL MODULE; ITALIAN: MODULO SPERIMENTALE ELETTROMECCANICO) Overview / summary of the initiative Title: MoSE (Experimental Electromechanical Module; Italian: MOdulo Sperimentale Elettromeccanico) Country: Italy (Veneto region) Thematic area: Security, Climate change Objective(s): 1. To protect from flooding the city of Venice and the Venetian Lagoon, with its towns, villages and inhabitants along with its iconic historic, artistic and environmental heritage. 2. To contribute to the socio-economic growth of the area and hence to the development of the port and related activities. 3. To guarantee the existing and future port activities inside the Lagoon in its various specificities of Chioggia, Cavallino and Venice. Timeline: The launch of the project started in 1973, when for the first time the Italian Government took in consideration the realisation of mechanic structures to prevent Venice from flooding. 2003 (start of the works)-2019 (estimation) Scale of the initiative: EUR 5.493 million (2014 estimation) Scope of the initiative • Focused on new knowledge creation (basic research, TRLs 1-4): TO A CERTAIN EXTENT; the development and following implementation of the MoSE project have focused on knowledge creation and prototypes development since the 1980s. However, this is useful to the construction at the three inlets of the Venice lagoon and mobile barriers. • Focused on knowledge application (applied research, TRLs 5-9): YES; the MoSE project aims to apply the developed technological solutions and to demonstrate its validity. Source of funding (public/private/public-private): Public funding: since 2003 (year of start of the works) the national government has been the financial promoter of the MoSE.
    [Show full text]
  • Do the Adaptations of Venice and Miami to Sea Level Rise Offer Lessons for Other Vulnerable Coastal Cities?
    Environmental Management https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01198-z Do the Adaptations of Venice and Miami to Sea Level Rise Offer Lessons for Other Vulnerable Coastal Cities? 1 2 3 Emanuela Molinaroli ● Stefano Guerzoni ● Daniel Suman Received: 5 February 2019 / Accepted: 29 July 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Both Venice and Miami are high-density coastal cities that are extremely vulnerable to rising sea levels and climate change. Aside from their sea-level location, they are both characterized by large populations, valuable infrastructure and real estate, and economic dependence on tourism, as well as the availability of advanced scientific data and technological expertize. Yet their responses have been quite different. We examine the biophysical environments of the two cities, as well as their socio- economic features, administrative arrangements vulnerabilities, and responses to sea level rise and flooding. Our study uses a qualitative approach to illustrate how adaptation policies have emerged in these two coastal cities. Based on this information, we critically compare the different adaptive responses of Venice and Miami and suggest what each city may learn from the 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: other, as well as offer lessons for other vulnerable coastal cities. In the two cases presented here it would seem that adaptation to SLR has not yet led to a reformulation of the problem or a structural transformation of the relevant institutions. Decision-makers must address the complex issue of rising seas with a combination of scientific knowledge, socio-economic expertize, and good governance. In this regard, the “hi-tech” approach of Venice has generated problems of its own (as did the flood control projects in South Florida over half a century ago), while the increasing public mobilization in Miami appears more promising.
    [Show full text]
  • Antica Pianta Dell'inclita Città Di Venezia : Delineata Circa La Metà Del
    mi. 4 : ' iS r o YA N — _J Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Research Library, The Getty Research Institute http://www.archive.org/details/anticapiantadellOOtema ANTICA PIANTA DELL' INCLITA CITTA' DI VENEZIA DELINEATA CIRCA LA META DEL XII. SECOLO, Ed ora per la prima volta pubblicata, ed illuftrata, DISSERTAZIONE TOPOGRAFI CO-S TORI CO-CRI T ICA D I TOMMASO TEMANZA ARCHITETTO, ED INGEGNERE DELLA SERENISSIMA REPUBBLICA DI VENEZIA Socio onorario delle due Reali Accademie di Parigi , e di Tolofa in Francia; ED IN ITALIA Della Clementina di Bologna, e della Olimpica di Vicenza. -V*^ IN VENEZIA M. DCC LXXXI. Nella Stamperia di Carlo Palese CON PUBBLICA A P P RO VA Z 1 O N E. Va bombii , qui nuìlum aìiud babet argumentum^ Quo fé probet diu vixijje, prater <etatem. Fr. M. G rapaidus de pgrtìbus ad'tum Lib. I. Cap. IL p. (54 ALLE LORO ECCELLENZE Pietro Barbarigo Pietro Zusto Girolamo Diedo x Signori Vettor Correr Bernardino Soranzo Pietro Trevisan SAVI, ED ESECUTORI DEL GRAVISSIMO MAGISTRATO DELLE ACQUE Tommaso Temanza Alla felice fttua'zjone della Citta di t^enezja traggono F origine quelle fingolarita , che la rendono ragguardevole pref- preffo tutte le Nazioni dei Mondo . La jcelta di effa fu opera della Sapienza dei gloriofi Maggiori di VV. EE. , come opera loro della , e intera Nazione fi è la Jìu- penda mole di quefla Metropoli . Tutte le altre Città del Mondo fono piantate [opra un fondo preparato dalla Natura: la fola Città di Venera è quella , che fu innalzata [opra un piano preparatole l/' da indujìria degT uòmini .
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Places of Interest
    Guide to places of interest Lido di Jesolo - Venezia Cortina Oderzo Portogruaro Noventa di Piave Treviso San Donà di Piave Caorle Altino Eraclea Vicenza Jesolo Eraclea Mare Burano Cortellazzo Lido di Jesolo Dolo Venezia Verona Padova Cavallino Mira Cà Savio Chioggia Jesolo and the hinterland. 3 Cathedrals and Roman Abbeys . 10 Visits to markets Concordia Sagittaria, Summaga and San Donà di Piave Venice . 4 From the sea to Venice’s Lagoon . 11 St Mark’s Square, the Palazzo Ducale (Doge’s Palace) and the Caorle, Cortellazzo, Treporti and Lio Piccolo Rialto Bridge The Marchland of Treviso The Islands of the Lagoon . 5 and the city of Treviso . 12 Murano, Burano and Torcello Oderzo, Piazza dei Signori and the Shrine of the Madonna of Motta Verona and Lake Garda. 6 Padua . 13 Sirmione and the Grottoes of Catullo Scrovegni Chapel and Piazza delle Erbe (Square of Herbs) The Arena of Verona and Opera . 7 Vicenza . 14 Operatic music The Olympic Theatre and the Ponte Vecchio (Old Bridge) of Bas- sano del Grappa Cortina and the Dolomites . 8 The three peaks of Lavaredo and Lake Misurina Riviera del Brenta . 15 Villas and gardens The Coastlines . 9 Malamocco, Pellestrina, Chioggia 2 Noventa di Piave Treviso San Donà di Piave Eraclea Caorle Jesolo Eraclea Mare Lido di Jesolo Cortellazzo Cavallino Jesolo and the hinterland The lagoon with its northern appendage wends its way into the area of Jesolo between the river and the cultivated countryside. The large fishing valleys of the northern lagoon extend over an area that is waiting to be explored. Whatever your requirements, please discuss these with our staff who will be more than happy to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence of Venice Littoral Islands - IT
    Defence of Venice littoral islands - IT Defence of Venice littoral islands - IT 1. Policy Objective & Theme ADAPTATION TO RISK: Managing impacts of climate change and safeguarding resilience of coasts/coastal systems SUSTAINABLE USE OF RESOURCES: Preserving coastal environment (its functioning and integrity) to share space 2. Key Approaches Knowledge-based Technical 3. Experiences that can be exchanged The measures adopted are the most important protected beach nourishment projects ever implemented in Italy on an eroding coastline with sea wall, according to the most advanced techniques of modern coastal engineering, attributing great importance to the protected nourished beaches for their capacity to dissipate wave energy in a resilient way. 4. Overview of the case The coastal barrier between the Adriatic Sea and the lagoon is constituted by the littorals of Jesolo, Cavallino, Lido, Pellestrina, Sottomarina and Isola Verde. The lagoon communicates with the sea through the three inlets of Lido, Malamocco and Chioggia. Over time, the coastal strip has lost its defensive function. The built-up areas closest to the sea are ever more often at risk.These problems have been faced through a complex programme of interventions, including the reinforcement of the coastline. The measures adopted have been developed from international experienced reshaped for the particular coastline. 5. Context and Objectives a) Context Venice is located in a lagoon protected from the Adriatic Sea by a coastal barrier that stretches for a total of about 60 km. The coastline is made up of strips of land: the coastal strips of Jesolo and Cavallino, the two inlands of Lido and Pellestrina and the sand beaches of Sottomarina and Isola Verde.
    [Show full text]
  • Venetian Foreign Affairs from 1250 to 1381: the Wars with Genoa and Other External Developments
    Venetian Foreign Affairs from 1250 to 1381: The Wars with Genoa and Other External Developments By Mark R. Filip for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in History College of Liberal Arts and Sciences University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois 1988 Table of Contents Major Topics page Introduction 1 The First and Second Genoese Wars 2 Renewed Hostilities at Ferrara 16 Tiepolo's Attempt at Revolution 22 A New Era of Commercial Growth 25 Government in Territories of the Republic 35 The Black Death and Third ' < 'ioese War 38 Portolungo 55 A Second Attempt at Rcvoiut.on 58 Doge Gradenigo and Peace with Genoa 64 Problems in Hungary and Crete 67 The Beginning of the Contarini Dogcship 77 Emperor Paleologus and the War of Chioggia 87 The Battle of Pola 94 Venetian Defensive Successes 103 Zeno and the Venetian Victory 105 Conclusion 109 Endnotes 113 Annotated Bibliography 121 1 Introduction In the years preceding the War of Chioggia, Venetian foreign affairs were dominated by conflicts with Genoa. Throughout the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, the two powers often clashed in open hostilities. This antagonism between the cities lasted for ten generations, and has been compared to the earlier rivalry between Rome and Carthage. Like the struggle between the two ancient powers, the Venetian/Gcnoan hatred stemmed from their competitive relationship in maritime trade. Unlike land-based rivals, sea powers cannot be separated by any natural boundary or agree to observe any territorial spheres of influence. Trade with the Levant, a source of great wealth and prosperity for each of the cities, required Venice and Genoa to come into repeated conflict in ports such as Chios, Lajazzo, Acre, and Tyre.
    [Show full text]
  • Prima Di Venezia. Terre, Acque E Insediamenti
    Prima di Venezia. Terre, acque e insediamenti. Strumenti GIS per una comprensione delle trasformazioni territoriali tra tarda antichità e altomedioevo DIEGO CALAON UNIVERSITÀ CA’ FOSCARI - VENEZIA FACOLTÀ DI LETTERE E FILOSOFIA Dottorato di ricerca in ARCHEOLOGIA E STORIA DEI PAESI DEL MEDITERRANEO 18° ciclo, A.A. 2002/2003 – A.A. 2004/2005 PRIMA DI VENEZIA. TERRE, ACQUE E INSEDIAMENTI. STRUMENTI GIS PER UNA COMPRENSIONE DELLE TRASFORMAZIONI TERRITORIALI TRA TARDA ANTICHITÀ E ALTOMEDIOEVO Tesi di dottorato di DIEGO CALAON n. matr. T. 00275 Coordinatore del dottorato Tutore del dottorando prof. VINCENZO FONTANA Prof. SAURO GELICHI Di Oderzo i figli edificar la bella La gentile Eraclea, di Oderzo i figli, Cui premea la barbarica procella E di Rotari Re stringean gli artigli, … Sorse in breve Eraclea, forte di mura, Forte di torri e dalle fonde valli Che intorno intorno le facean cintura E la chiudean ai fanti e ai cavalli, … L’isole che crescevano ad ora ad ora Di abitatori a Rivolto intorno, Eressero Eraclea a loro signora, e ne resero splendido il soggiorno. A. VECELLIO, Il Piave, poema, Feltre 1903, p. 118. Indice pag. 4 Introduzione PARTE I. PRIMA DI VENEZIA. LAGUNA ED ENTROTERRA. TERRA O ACQUA NELL’ANTICHITÀ? 1. Terra o acqua? 9 1.1. La determinazione geografica dell’area di ricerca. 12 1.2. La determinazione dello spazio, la determinazione dell’attendibilità delle fonti e la filosofia GIS 21 1.3 L’Archeologia nel territorio lagunare negli ultimi anni 23 1.4 Quale paesaggio PARTE II. PRIMA DI VENEZIA. ALTINO E CITTANOVA 2.1. Altino 25 2.1.1 La sperimentazione della piattaforma GIS: il territorio di Altino 31 2.1.2 Altino nell’altomedieoevo 33 2.1.3 Da Altino a Torcello 2.2 Cittanova 36 2.2.1 Cittanova secondo la tradizione 37 2.2.2 Il problema del nome 39 2.2.3 La scoperta di una città 40 2.2.4 Una nuova analisi su vecchi dati.
    [Show full text]
  • Marco Favaro Presentation
    COPING with FLOODS and CLIMATE CHANGE 5 November 2020 Marco Favaro Tidal Forecasting and [email protected] Early Warning Centre Tidal Forecasting and Early Warning Centre Tidal forecasting in Venice Marco Favaro Directorate Municipal Police Tidal Forecasting and Early Warning Centre (Centro Maree) City of Venice Venice and the high water TIDES in venice “Acqua Alta” (High Tide) 140 cm exceptional high tide 110 ÷ 139 cm very high tide 90 ÷ 109 cm high tide -50 ÷ 89 cm NORMAL TIDE -90 ÷ -51 cm tide under the normal level < -90 cm exceptional low tide “Acqua bassa” (Shallow water) Tidal Forecasting and Early Warning Centre (Centro Maree) Tasks of Centro Maree • Meteo-mareographic monitoring in the lagoon of Venice and in the sea facing it • Calculation of the astronomical tide in Venice • Forecasting of tide level • Forecasting on the state of the sea (wave height/direction) • Information and early warning • High tide walkways system management Tidal Forecasting and Early Warning Centre (Centro Maree) Meteo-mareographic Monitoring stations: 11 in the lagoon Monitoring Network 3 at the inlets 2 offshore 2 repeaters Measured parameters: - sea level - waves height - atmospheric pressure - wind speed and direction - humidity - air and water temperature - solar radiation Peripheral monitoring stations Tidal Forecasting and Early Warning Centre (Centro Maree) Calculation of the Astronomical Tide in Venice Tidal Forecasting and Early Warning Centre (Centro Maree) The forecast of tide level in Venice Forecasting models: 3 deterministic models 23 statistical models The forecast of tide level in Venice Analysis of the current meteorological and marine data Saline Burano Murano Misericordia CPSM Palazzo Cavalli S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Operating Venetian Lagoon: the Agency of Barene
    The Operating Venetian Lagoon: The Agency of Barene. A resilient landscape infrastructure towards cultural, ecological and productive heritage preservation. Amina Chouairi, Student, Delft Technical University [email protected], [email protected] (+39) 339 8853874 Foulkeslaan 82 Delft, NL 2625RA Abstract This paper presents and discusses a research (by design) conducted during a Landscape Architecture Master thesis on the Venetian Lagoon, North of Italy - a territory in constant transition, presenting a landscape of delicate equilibrium, threatened by the combined effects of climate change and consequently sea level rise on one side and human actions on the other (as the extreme flooding event of November 2019 demonstrates). The research aims to seek for ways how to mitigate the above-mentioned threats by providing nature-based solutions. Therefore, it is necessary to address crucial issues as the Venetian Lagoon hydro-morphological sufferance, the over-engineered flood defence design and the state of neglect of its secondary islands. Secondary objectives the research takes in consideration are habitats restoration, creation of alternative forms of slow-tourism, enrichment of local community livelihood and economical vibrancy, and enhancement of the cultural image of the Venetian Lagoon as a stretched, unceasing water surface consisting of a diffuse sense of horizontality. From the conducted research, what emerges is the need for redefining the role of the entire Venetian Lagoon in the next future, shifting it from passive to active, from being exploited and consequently damaged, to be able to mitigate future impacts sustainably without losing the spatial characteristics of its territory. To do so, the main strategy proposed is to reinforce the barene landscape - fundamental for the hydro-morphological and ecological survival of the lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Ecosystem of the Lagoon of Venice, with Emphasis on Anthropogenic Impact
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published October 3 Mar Ecol Prog Ser , Study of the ecosystem of the lagoon of Venice, with emphasis on anthropogenic impact Yu. I. Sorokinl, P. Yu. Sorokinl, 0.Giovanardi2,*, L. Dalla venezia3 'Southern Dept. of Oceanology, Gelendzhik-7, Krasnodar district, 353470 Russia 'Istituto Centrale per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica Applicata al Mare (ICRAM), viale della Stazione 5, 1-30015 Chioggia, Italy "stituto di Biologia del Mare, CNR, Riva Sette Martiri 1364, 1-30122 Venice, Italy ABSTRACT: The parameters of the structure and functioning of the ecosystem in the lagoon of Venice (Italy) were estimated in September-October 1993 at 36 stations. Phytoplankton was dominated by its nano- and pico-fractions, which comprised 60 to 99":# of the total phytoplankton biomass. Phytoplank- ton wet biomass varied between 100 and 600 mg m-.' and its primary production between 30 and 90 mg C m ' d.' The nume~icalabundance of bactel-ioplankton (3 to 6 X 10" cells ml-'l and its wet biomass (0.3to 1 g m-" was 2 to 3 times greater than in adjacent waters of the Adriatic. Bacterial production was 20 to 40 mg C m-'d.'. hdicrozooplankton was dominated by cillates with blo~nassesof 30 to 700 mg m-', while the density of rotifers and nauplii was low. The composition of mesozooplankton resembled that of the Adriatic complex only near the port entrances connecting the lagoon to the sea, while in polluted areas it was drastically depleted. Its average wet biomass was 80 to 300 mg m-', attaming 700 to 1100 mg m-' near the port entrances.
    [Show full text]
  • EFDRR Resilient Venice
    1st meeting of the European Forum for Disaster Risk Reduction (EFDRR) Stenungbaden, Sweden 6-8 October 2010 Fragile and resilient: the Venice’s paradigm Pierpaolo Campostrini CORILA, Director Consortium for Managing Research Activities in the Venice Lagoon On the behalf of The Venice Municipality The History The main reason for building a city in a tidal lagoon of the northern Adriatic sea, was looking for refuge under the pressure of repeated invasions of the V-VI century. Around the 810 AD the Head of these small settlements (the Doge) moved from Malamocco to Rialto (Venice) Problems were turned into opportunities and in the XIV century Venice was already one of the richest cities of Europe and the Serenissima Repubblica a great power of the Mediterranean. In the XIV century, the lagoon of Venice was different from today: •large rivers flowing into the lagoon •5 - 8 unstable inlets •large extension of marshes •tendency of tidal flats to become silted risk of infilling of the lagoon From the XIV to the XVIII century great care was taken by the Serenissima Repubblica to defend its lagoon “against sea, rivers and man” 4 Location: 45°10’ N 12°40’ E, Length: ab. 51km . Width: ab. 12km . Perimeter: 157km. Total surface: 540km 2, of which Mestre 8% land above sea level (littorals, reclaimed areas, islands, embankments) and 92% “water system”: channels Porto Lido Marghera (11,9%), shallows, mud flats Venezia inlet and salt marshes (80,1%). Channels and open waters Adriatic (depth >150cm): 66km 2. Sea Shallows (depth between 150 e Malamocco 40 cm): 243km 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Partial Use of Venice Flood Barriers
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Effect of Partial Use of Venice Flood Barriers Luca Cavallaro * ID , Claudio Iuppa ID and Enrico Foti ID Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia, 64-95123 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (C.I.); [email protected] (E.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 09 November 2017; Accepted: 04 December 2017; Published: 11 December 2017 Abstract: The Venice lagoon is one of the most important areas in Italy because of its history and its particular structure and form. In order to defend Venice and other towns within the lagoon from severe floods, the Italian Government promotes a project that includes, among other measures, the construction of the Experimental Electromechanical Module (MoSE). The MoSE is a system of mobile gates installed at the lagoon inlets that are able to temporarily isolate the Venetian lagoon from the Adriatic Sea during severe storm surge events, thus ensuring acceptable safeguarding water levels. To prevent interference between the barriers and the normal port activities, locks have been constructed at each lagoon inlet. However, the use of such locks causes a slowdown in maritime traffic. In order to evaluate a means of reducing such interference during the flooding events characterized by high but not extreme water levels, the present paper demonstrates, by means of a numerical approach, that one of the three inlets can be left open so as to ensure the transit of the vessels. The present paper also points out the meteorological conditions for which the safeguarding water levels of the lagoon are not exceeded when closing only two inlets.
    [Show full text]