DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Assessment for Reestablishment of Sonoran Pronghorn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Assessment for Reestablishment of Sonoran Pronghorn Draft Environmental Assessment for Reestablishment of Sonoran Pronghorn U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 1 October 2009 This page left blank intentionally 1 October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION............................................ 1 1.1 Proposed Action.............................................................. 2 1.2 Project Need................................................................. 6 1.3 Background Information on Sonoran Pronghorn . 9 1.3.1 Taxonomy.............................................................. 9 1.3.2 Historic Distribution and Abundance......................................... 9 1.3.3 Current Distribution and Abundance........................................ 10 1.3.4 Life History............................................................ 12 1.3.5 Habitat................................................................ 13 1.3.6 Food and Water......................................................... 18 1.3.7 Home Range, Movement, and Habitat Area Requirements . 18 1.4 Project Purpose ............................................................. 19 1.5 Decision to be Made.......................................................... 19 1.6 Compliance with Laws, Regulations, and Plans . 19 1.7 Permitting Requirements and Authorizations Needed . 21 1.8 Scoping Summary............................................................ 21 1.8.1 Internal Agency Scoping.................................................. 21 1.8.2 Public Scoping ......................................................... 21 1.8.3 Issue Identification...................................................... 22 2.0 ALTERNATIVES, INCLUDING NO ACTION ....................................... 24 2.1 Alternative Formulation....................................................... 24 2.1.1 Reestablishment Technique Options ........................................ 24 2.1.2 Legal Status Options..................................................... 25 2.1.3 Location Options........................................................ 26 2.1.4 Additional Alternative Development Considerations . 29 2.2 Alternatives Analyzed in Detail................................................. 30 2.2.1 Alternative I: No Action.................................................. 31 2.2.2 Alternative II: Captive-Breeding Pen at Kofa NWR, Holding Pen at BMGR-East . 31 2.2.3 Alternative III: Captive-Breeding Pen at BMGR-East . 37 2.2.4 Nonessential Experimental Designation and 4(d) Rule . 39 2.3 Mitigation Measures.......................................................... 42 2.4 Monitoring and Adaptive Management Plan....................................... 43 2.5 Comparison of Alternatives.................................................... 43 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EFFECTS.......................................... 49 3.1 Assessment of Impacts........................................................ 49 3.1.1 Impact Assessment Method ............................................... 49 3.1.2 Ramifications of Nonessential Experimental Population Designation . 51 Environmental Assessment for Reestablishment of Sonoran Pronghorn Page i 1 October 2009 3.2 Conservation Status of Sonoran Pronghorn........................................ 51 3.2.1 Existing Conditions...................................................... 51 3.2.2 Effects on Conservation Status of Sonoran Pronghorn . 57 3.3 Wildlife, Including Special-Status Animal Species . 64 3.3.1 Existing Conditions...................................................... 64 3.3.2 Effects on Wildlife, Including Special-Status Animal Species . 71 3.4 Vegetation, Including Special-Status Plant Species . 75 3.4.1 Existing Conditions...................................................... 75 3.4.2 Effects on Vegetation, Including Special-Status Plant Species . 82 3.5 Water ..................................................................... 84 3.5.1 Existing Conditions...................................................... 84 3.5.2 Effects on Water........................................................ 85 3.6 Air Quality................................................................. 86 3.6.1 Existing Conditions...................................................... 86 3.6.2 Effects on Air Quality.................................................... 88 3.7 Noise Levels................................................................ 90 3.7.1 Existing Conditions...................................................... 90 3.7.2 Effects on Noise Levels .................................................. 91 3.8 Socioeconomic Conditions and Environmental Justice . 92 3.8.1 Existing Conditions...................................................... 92 3.8.2 Effects on Socioeconomic Conditions and Environmental Justice . 96 3.9 Cultural Resources........................................................... 98 3.9.1 Existing Conditions...................................................... 98 3.9.2 Effects on Cultural Resources ............................................. 99 3.10 Recreation, Wilderness, and Public Access . 99 3.10.1 Existing Conditions..................................................... 99 3.10.2 Effects on Recreation, Wilderness, and Public Access . 105 3.11 Military Operations ........................................................ 106 3.11.1 Existing Conditions.................................................... 106 3.11.2 Effects on Military Operations........................................... 107 3.12 Livestock Grazing ......................................................... 108 3.12.1 Existing Conditions.................................................... 108 3.12.2 Effects on Livestock Grazing............................................ 111 3.13 Hazardous Materials........................................................ 112 3.13.1 Existing Conditions.................................................... 112 3.13.2 Effects on Hazardous Materials .......................................... 112 3.14 Cumulative Effects......................................................... 112 3.15 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources . 119 4.0 COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ANALYSIS OF SIGNIFICANCE . 120 5.0 EA PREPARERS .............................................................. 121 6.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION......................................... 122 Environmental Assessment for Reestablishment of Sonoran Pronghorn Page ii 1 October 2009 7.0 LITERATURE CITED.......................................................... 123 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Estimated U.S. population size of Sonoran pronghorn from 1924 to July 2009. 11 Table 2. Screening criteria scores for potential Sonoran pronghorn reestablishment areas. 28 Table 3. Land status of proposed Sonoran pronghorn reestablishment areas A and D. 31 Table 4. Summary of potential effects on resource categories from each alternative. 44 Table 5. Land status within the current U.S. range of Sonoran pronghorn. 52 Table 6. Sonoran pronghorn recruitment and release from the captive-rearing pen, 2004-2009. 56 Table 7. Extrapolation procedure for application of modeled habitat to all of Area D. 58 Table 8. Potential habitat, in square miles, for Sonoran pronghorn under the three alternatives . 59 Table 9. Special-status animal species in the four counties encompassing the action area. 65 Table 10. Summary of effects on special-status animal species from alternatives II and III. 72 Table 11. Special-status plant species in the four counties encompassing the action area. 78 Table 12. Summary of effects on special-status plant species from alternatives II and III. 83 Table 13. Air quality attainment status.................................................. 86 Table 14. Counties in alternative Sonoran pronghorn reintroduction areas A and D . 93 Table 15. Population of the counties comprising areas A and D . 94 Table 16. Economic characteristics of alternative Sonoran pronghorn reintroduction areas . 96 Table 17. Estimated costs of alternatives II and III over the 10-year analysis period . 97 Table 18. Federal Wilderness areas potential Sonoran pronghorn reintroduction areas A and D. 100 Table 19. Estimated visitor use days to King Valley, Kofa NWR, 1998-2008. 103 Table 20. List of reasonably foreseeable future actions planned in the action area. 113 Table 21. Summary of cumulative effects of the action alternatives . 114 Environmental Assessment for Reestablishment of Sonoran Pronghorn Page iii 1 October 2009 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Historic and current ranges of Sonoran pronghorn. 3 Figure 2. Location of the proposed captive-breeding pen at Kofa NWR . 4 Figure 3. Location of the proposed holding pen on the Barry M. Goldwater Range . 5 Figure 4. Sonoran pronghorn doe (with radiocollar) and her fawn . 7 Figure 5. Sonoran pronghorn captive-breeding pen at Cabeza Prieta NWR. 8 Figure 6. Sonoran pronghorn in Arizona Upland vegetation . 14 Figure 7. Chain-fruit cholla at Cabeza Prieta NWR . 15 Figure 8. Lower Colorado River Valley vegetation at Kofa NWR . 17 Figure 9. Potential reestablishment areas for Sonoran pronghorn . 27 Figure 10. Detailed location of proposed captive-breeding pen site in Area A on Kofa NWR . 32 Figure 11. Detailed location of proposed holding pen site in Area D on BMGR-East. 34 Figure 12. Detailed location of alternative captive-breeding pen site in Area D on BMR-East . 38 Figure 13. Proposed nonessential experimental population area for Sonoran pronghorn. 40 Figure 14. Cause and effect diagram
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: a Flora of Southwestern Arizona
    Felger, R.S., S. Rutman, and J. Malusa. 2014. Ajo Peak to Tinajas Altas: A flora of southwestern Arizona. Part 6. Poaceae – grass family. Phytoneuron 2014-35: 1–139. Published 17 March 2014. ISSN 2153 733X AJO PEAK TO TINAJAS ALTAS: A FLORA OF SOUTHWESTERN ARIZONA Part 6. POACEAE – GRASS FAMILY RICHARD STEPHEN FELGER Herbarium, University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 & Sky Island Alliance P.O. Box 41165, Tucson, Arizona 85717 *Author for correspondence: [email protected] SUSAN RUTMAN 90 West 10th Street Ajo, Arizona 85321 JIM MALUSA School of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 [email protected] ABSTRACT A floristic account is provided for the grass family as part of the vascular plant flora of the contiguous protected areas of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, and the Tinajas Altas Region in southwestern Arizona. This is the second largest family in the flora area after Asteraceae. A total of 97 taxa in 46 genera of grasses are included in this publication, which includes ones established and reproducing in the modern flora (86 taxa in 43 genera), some occurring at the margins of the flora area or no long known from the area, and ice age fossils. At least 28 taxa are known by fossils recovered from packrat middens, five of which have not been found in the modern flora: little barley ( Hordeum pusillum ), cliff muhly ( Muhlenbergia polycaulis ), Paspalum sp., mutton bluegrass ( Poa fendleriana ), and bulb panic grass ( Zuloagaea bulbosa ). Non-native grasses are represented by 27 species, or 28% of the modern grass flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Aquarius Milkvetch (Astragalus Newberryi Var
    Arizona BLM Sensitive Species List (October, 2005) AZ-100 AZ-200 AZ-310 AZ-410 AZ-320 AZ-420 AZ-330 Key: V=Verified Occurrence Arizona Phoenix Kingman Safford Yuma Tucson Lake X=Probable/Possible Occurrence Strip Havasu Plants Aquarius milkvetch (Astragalus newberryi var. aquarii) V Aravaipa woodfern (Thelypteris puberula var. sonorensis) V V Aravaipa sage (Salvia amissa) V Arizona Sonoran rosewood (Vauquelinia californica ssp sonorensis) V Bartram stonecrop (Graptopetalum bartramii) V Black Rock daisy (Townsendia smithii) V Blue sand lily (Triteleiopsis palmeri) V California flannelbush (Fremontodendron californica) V V Chisos Mountains coralroot (Hexalectris revoluta) X Cliff milkvetch (Astragalus cremnophylax var.myriorraphus) V Clifton rock daisy (Perityle ambrosiifolia) V Dalhouse spleenwort (Asplenium (Ceterach) dalhousiae) V Diamond Butte milkvetch (Astragalus toanus var.scidulus) V Fish Creek fleabane (Erigeron piscaticus) X Gentry indigo bush (Dalea tentaculoides) X Giant sedge (Carex spissa var. ultra) V V V Grand Canyon rose (Rosa stellata var.abyssa) V Huachuca golden aster (Heterotheca rutteri) V Huachuca milkvetch (Astragalus hypoxylus) X Kaibab pincushion cactus (Pediocactus paradinei) V Kearney sumac (Rhus kearneyi ssp kearneyi) V Kofa Mt barberry (Berberis harrisoniana) X X X Marble Canyon Milkvetch (Astragalus cremnophylax var. hevronii) V Mt Trumbull beardtongue (Penstemon distans) V Murphey agave (Agave murpheyi) V Paria Plateau fishhook cactus (Sclerocactus sileri) V Attachment 1 - 1 Arizona BLM Sensitive Species
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Uranium Favorability of Cenozoic Sedimentary Rocks, Basin
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A Study of Uranium Favorability of Cenozoic Sedimentary Rocks Basin and Range Province, Arizona Part I General Geology and Chronology of Pre-late Miocene Cenozoic Sedimentary Rocks By Robert Scarborough and Jan Carol Wilt Open File Report 79-1429 1979 This report was funded by U.S. Geological Survey Grant No. 14-08-0001528. It;has not been edited for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards or with accepted U.S. Geological Survey stratigraphic nomenclature. FOREWORD This report by Robert Scarborough and Jan Carol Wilt summarizes the results of a study made for the U.S. Geological Survey jointly by the Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology and the Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, College of Earth Sciences, University of Arizona, under Grant No. 14-08-0001528. Age dating by the K/Ar method was cost-shared with. NSF Grant No. EAR78-11535 which supports volcanic rock studies by the Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry. It is considered that this report adequately fulfills the agreement objectives. Principal Investigator: H. Wesley Peirce, Principal Geologist Geological Survey Branch Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology University of Arizona, Tucson Co-Principal Investigator: Paul E. Damon, Chief Scientist Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry Department of Geosciences College of Earth Sciences University of Arizona, Tucson CONTENTS Page Abstract ,....,,...,...,........« « 1 Introduction ...,.,..*....««..« «« 3 General statement ........ , ».....,....». 3 Purpose and scope .«..,,.....,.......... 3 Acknowledgments ..................... * . 4 Location and physiographic setting .............. 4 Approach ........................... 5 General Cenozoic geology of Basin and Range Province sediments . General statement ...................... 7 Group I localities with radioactive anomalies ........ 9 Mineta Formation ..................... 9 Cardinal Avenue sediments ................
    [Show full text]
  • University Micrcxilms International 300 N
    A TAXONOMIC STUDY OF THE LENNOACEAE. Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Yatskievych, George Alfred, 1957- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 14:29:13 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/274684 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Split Rock Trail Most Diverse Vegetation Types in North America
    Species List Species List National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Color Species Habit Season Color Species Habit Season Section 2, ■ • Section 1 W Ambrosia dumosa (burrobush) S C Y Opuntia chlorotica (pancake cactus) C c Joshua Tree National Park W Brickellia atractyloides (pungent brickellia) S c Y Rhus aromatica (skunk bush) s C w Caulanthus cooperi (Cooper's caulanthus) A c Y Senegalia greggii (cat's claw acacia) s H % w Chaenacf/s srew'o('c/es (Esteve's pincushion) A c Y Senna armata (desert senna) s C, H w Cryptantha barbigera (bearded forget-me-not) A c Y Tetradymia stenolepis (Mojave cottonthorn) s H w Cryptantha nevadensis (Nevada forget-me-not) A c 0 Adenophyllum porophylloides (San Felipe dyssodia) SS C, H tv w Eriogonum davidsonii (Davidson's buckwheat) A c, H 0 Sphaeraicea ambigua (apricot mallow) p C V w Eriogonum fasciculatum (California buckwheat) S C, H p Allium parishii (Parish's onion) B C \ w Eriogonum wrightii (Wright's buckwheat) SS H p Cylindropuntia ramosissima (pencil cholla) c H t Section 4 w Euphorbia albomarginata (rattlesnake weed) A C, H I p Echinocereus engelmannii (hedgehog cactus) c C P- ♦ Section 31 w Galium stellatum (starry bedstraw) SS C p Krameria erecta (littieleaf ratany) s C W/P Giliastellata (stargiiia) A C P/W Mirabilis laevis (wishbone bush) p c w Lepidium lasiocarpum (white pepperweed) A c _PJ Opuntia basilaris (beavertai! cactus) c c N w Lycium andersonii (Anderson's boxthorn) S c p Stephanomeria exigua (small wirelettuce) A C,H A w Lydum cooperi (Cooper's boxthorn) s c p Stephanomeria parryi (Parry's wirelettuce) P c w Nolina parryi (Parry nolina) s c p IStephanomeria paudflora (brownplume wirelettuce) SS c 0 500 2000 Feet w Pectocarya recurvata (arched-nut comb-bur) A c Boechera xylopoda (bigfoot hybrid rockcress) P c 0 150 600 Meters w Pecfocarya serosa (round-nut comb-bur) A c Delphinium parishii (Parish's larkspur) P c See inside of guide for plants found in each section of this map.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 905 Xxii. Appendix
    APPENDIX 905 XXII. APPENDIX 1. Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990 PUBLIC LAW 101–628—NOV. 28, 1990 104 STAT. 4469 Public Law 101–628 101st Congress An Act To provide for the designation of certain public lands as wilderness in the State of Nov. 28, 1990 Arizona. [H.R. 2570] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.—Titles I through III of this Act may be Arizona Desert cited as the “Arizona Desert Wilderness Act of 1990”. Wilderness Act of 1990. TITLE I—DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS TO BE 16 USC 460ddd ADMINISTERED BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT note. National Wilderness SEC. 101. DESIGNATION AND MANAGEMENT. Preservation System. (a) DESIGNATION.—In furtherance of the purposes of the 16 USC 1132 Wilderness Act, the following public lands are hereby designated as note. wilderness and therefore, as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 23,600 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled “Mount Wilson Wilderness” and dated February 1990, and which shall be known as the Mount Wilson Wilderness; (2) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 31,070 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled “Mount Tipton Wilderness” and dated February 1990, and which shall be known as the Mount Tipton Wilderness; (3) certain lands in Mohave County, Arizona, which comprise approximately 27,530 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled
    [Show full text]
  • BLM Public Land Statistics 2007
    Click Here for Table of Contents PUBLIC LAND STATISTICS 2007 Volume 192 BLM/OC/ST-08/001+1165 May 2008 WELCOME TO PUBLIC LAND STATISTICS 2007 Welcome to the 2007 edition of Public Land Statistics, published by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM). As in years past, the cover of this year’s publication is designed to convey the scope of the Bureau’s complex and multifaceted mission using visual imagery. The 80-plus tables inside the document tell the story of the BLM’s mission, programs, and accomplishments using numerical data and detailed footnotes. Many of the minor acreage changes from 1 year to the next occur because: 1. Inholdings have been acquired or some other land exchange has taken place during the year. 2. Better GIS mapping of land boundaries has enabled us to recalculate the total BLM acres within the unit. Public Land Statistics is available on the Internet. Please visit our national homepage at: http://www.blm.gov/public_land_statistics/index.htm . Note that the data presented in the 2007 Public Land Statistics tables may not exactly match the data in other BLM publications covering Fiscal Year 2007 operations and accomplishments. This occurs because the databases that provide table data are not static; they are constantly being updated to provide the latest information, sometimes many months after the end of the fiscal year. We have presented the most current data available in this edition of Public Land Statistics. We remain committed to publishing a Public Land Statistics report each year that is timely, complete, and helpful as possible to our readers.
    [Show full text]