DOCSLIB.ORG

Pilot Operating Handbook Pilot Operating Handbook for Gyroplane Cavalon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pilot Operating Handbook Pilot Operating Handbook for Gyroplane Cavalon Pilot Operating Handbook Pilot Operating Handbook for Gyroplane Cavalon AutoGyro_POH_Cavalon Revision 3.1 – Issue Date 20.10.2018 Pre-pages 1 All rights reserved. Under the copyright laws, this manual may not be copied, in whole or in part, without the written consent of AutoGyro GmbH. AutoGyro reserves the right to change or improve its products and to make changes in the content of this manual without obligation to notify any person or organisation of such changes or improvements. Notifications to the Civil Aviation Authorities or other organisations based on legal regulations are unaffected. MTOsport, Calidus, Cavalon, the AutoGyro logo and word picture mark are trademarks or registered trademarks of AutoGyro AG, registered in Germany and other countries. Other company and product names mentioned herein may be trademarks of their respective companies. Mention of third- party products is for informational purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation. AutoGyro assumes no responsibility with regard to the performance or use of these products. All understandings, agreements, or warranties, if any, take place directly between the vendors and the prospective users. U.S. and foreign patents of AutoGyro AG are used in the Calidus and Cavalon gyroplanes - (US.Pat.No. 8,690,100; US.Pat.No. D699,153) Every effort has been made to ensure that the information in this manual is accurate. AutoGyro GmbH is not responsible for printing or clerical errors. AutoGyro_POH_Cavalon Revision 3.1 – Issue Date 20.10.2018 Pre-pages 2 Pilot Operating Handbook for Gyroplane Cavalon Model: ______________________________________________ Serial number: ______________________________________________ Registration: ______________________________________________ Type certificate number: ______________________________________________ Aircraft manufacturer and type certificate holder: AutoGyro GmbH, Dornierstraße 14 D-31137 Hildesheim Tel.: +49 (0) 51 21 / 8 80 56-00 Fax: +49 (0) 51 21 / 8 80 56-19 Distribution partner: ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ Owner: ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ This flight manual is always to be carried on board of the aircraft and must be kept in current, up-to-date status. The latest revisions and version status is available at www.auto-gyro.com. Extent and revision status of the manual is recorded in the revision log and the table of content. This gyroplane may be operated only in strict compliance with the limitations and procedures contained in this manual. The manual is not a substitute for competent theoretical and practical training on the operation of this aircraft. Failure to adhere to its provisions or to take proper flight instruction can have fatal consequences. AutoGyro_POH_Cavalon Revision 3.1 – Issue Date 20.10.2018 Pre-pages 3 REVISION LOG Rev. Inserted by Date Signature 1.0 AutoGyro GmbH 01.07.2011 1.1 AutoGyro GmbH 01.09.2011 1.2 AutoGyro GmbH 01.01.2012 1.3 AutoGyro GmbH 01.04.2012 1.4 AutoGyro GmbH 01.11.2012 1.5 AutoGyro GmbH 24.06.2013 2.0 AutoGyro GmbH 16.06.2014 2.1 AutoGyro GmbH 01.07.2015 2.2 AutoGyro GmbH 01.06.2016 3.0 AutoGyro GmbH 17.07.2018 3.1 AutoGyro GmbH 20.10.2018 AutoGyro_POH_Cavalon Revision 3.1 – Issue Date 20.10.2018 Pre-pages 4 Pilot Operating Handbook Table of Contents Cavalon List of Effective Pages CONTENTS SECTION 1 - GENERAL...................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Certification ...................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Performance Data and Operating Procedures ...............................................1-1 1.4 Definition of Terms ........................................................................................1-2 1.5 Important Note...............................................................................................1-2 1.6 Three-view of the Cavalon.............................................................................1-3 1.7 Description ....................................................................................................1-4 1.8 Technical Data ..............................................................................................1-4 1.9 Rotor .............................................................................................................1-4 1.10 Engine...........................................................................................................1-5 1.11 Propeller........................................................................................................1-5 1.12 Unit Conversion.............................................................................................1-6 1.13 Abbreviations and Terminology .....................................................................1-7 SECTION 2 - LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................2-1 2.1 General .........................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Environmental Limitations..............................................................................2-2 2.3 Colour Code for Instrument Markings ............................................................2-3 2.4 Airspeed Limitations and Instrument Markings...............................................2-4 2.5 Rotor Speed Limitations and Instrument Markings.........................................2-5 2.6 Power Plant Limitations and Instrument Markings..........................................2-5 2.7 Weight and Balance ......................................................................................2-8 2.8 Flight Crew ....................................................................................................2-9 2.9 Kinds of Operation.........................................................................................2-9 2.10 Fuel.............................................................................................................2-10 2.11 Minimum Equipment....................................................................................2-11 2.12 Placards ......................................................................................................2-12 SECTION 3 - EMERGENCY PROCEDURES ...................................................................3-1 3.1 Engine Failure ...............................................................................................3-1 3.2 Air Restart Procedure ....................................................................................3-2 3.3 Landing into Trees or High Vegetation...........................................................3-2 3.4 Degradation of Engine Power ........................................................................3-3 3.5 Evacuating the Aircraft...................................................................................3-3 3.6 Smoke and Fire .............................................................................................3-3 3.7 Off-field Landing ............................................................................................3-4 3.8 Flight Control Malfunction ..............................................................................3-4 3.9 Pitch oscillation recovery ...............................................................................3-6 3.10 Vibration........................................................................................................3-6 3.11 Other equipment failure .................................................................................3-7 3.12 Door open in flight. ........................................................................................3-7 3.13 Warning and Caution Lights...........................................................................3-8 AutoGyro_POH_Cavalon Revision 3.1 – Issue Date 20.10.2018 Index / LOEP 1 Pilot Operating Handbook Table of Contents Cavalon List of Effective Pages 3.14 Parameters out of Limits ............................................................................. 3-12 3.15 Outside Air Temperature and Rotor Bearing Temperature........................... 3-12 3.16 Loss of Visibility........................................................................................... 3-12 3.17 Rotor Icing................................................................................................... 3-13 3.18 Landing with a Deflated Tyre....................................................................... 3-13 3.19 Failure of CSP/VPP Propeller (if installed)................................................... 3-13 3.20 Alternative Method of Engine Shut-down..................................................... 3-14 SECTION 4 - NORMAL PROCEDURES .......................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Airspeeds for Safe Operation ........................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Preparation for Flight..................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Daily or Pre-flight Checks.............................................................................. 4-1 4.4 Before Boarding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montgomerie-Bensen B8MR, G-BXDC
    Montgomerie-Bensen B8MR, G-BXDC AAIB Bulletin No: 1/2001 Ref: EW/C2000/04/03 - Category: 2.3 Aircraft Type and Registration: Montgomerie-Bensen B8MR, G-BXDC No & Type of Engines: 1 Rotax 582 piston engine Year of Manufacture: 1999 Date & Time (UTC): 16 April 2000 at 1411 hrs Location: Carlisle Airport, Cumbria Type of Flight: Private Persons on Board: Crew - 1 - Passengers - None Injuries: Crew - 1 - Passengers - N/A Nature of Damage: Aircraft destroyed Commander's Licence: Private Pilot's Licence (gyroplanes) Commander's Age: 51 years Commander's Flying Experience: 67 hours (of which 30 were on type) Last 90 days - 44 hours Last 28 days - 43 hours Information Source: AAIB Field Investigation Background information The pilot first showed an active interest in autogyros when in March 1999 he visited Carlisle Airport for a trial lesson. He had not flown before and enjoyed the experience so much that he flew again the same day and agreed to embark on a formal training programme with an instructor who was authorised by the CAA to conduct dual and single seat autogyro training as well as flight examinations. The instructor reported that his student approached all matters to do with his flying 'with a great deal of enthusiasm and a fair degree of ability'. From the start of his course until January 2000 the pilot undertook dual instruction, mainly at weekends, on a two seater VPM M16 autogyro. By March 2000 he was sufficiently experienced to transfer to the 'open frame' single-seat Benson autogyro. He flew this for approximately 20 hours, carrying out mainly short 'hops' along the length of the runway and practising balancing on the main wheels before progressing to flying the aircraft in the visual circuit and carrying out general handling exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews the SYCAMORE SEEDS
    Afterburner Book Reviews THE SYCAMORE SEEDS Early British Helicopter only to be smashed the following night in a gale. The book then covers the Cierva story in some detail, the Development chapter including, out of context, two paragraphs on By C E MacKay the Brennan propeller-driven rotor driven helicopter [helicogyro] fl own in 1924 at Farnborough but Distributed by A MacKay, 87 Knightscliffe Avenue, aborted by the Air Ministry the next year, stating that Netherton, Glasgow G13 2RX, UK (E charlese87@ there was no future for the helicopter and backing btinternet.com). 2014. 218pp. Illustrated. £12.95. Cierva’s autogyro programme contracting Avro to build ISBN 978-0-9573443-3-4. the fi rst British machines. Good coverage is given to the range of Cierva autogyros culminating in the Avro Given the paucity of coverage of British helicopter C30 Rota and its service use by the RAF. development I approached this slim (218 A5 pp) The heart of the book begins with a quotation: publication with interest. While autogyros have been “Morris, I want you to make me blades, helicopter well documented, Charnov and Ord-Hume giving blades,” with which William Weir, the fi rst Air Minister, exhaustive and well documented treatments of the founder of the RAF and supporter of Cierva, brought helicopter’s predecessor, the transition to the directly furniture maker H Morris & Co into the history of driven rotor of the helicopter is somewhat lacking. rotorcraft pulling in designers Bennett, Watson, Unfortunately MacKay’s book only contributes a Nisbet and Pullin with test pilots Marsh and Brie fi nal and short chapter to the ‘British Helicopter’ to form his team.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Aviation Administration, DOT § 61.45
    Federal Aviation Administration, DOT Pt. 61 Vmcl Minimum Control Speed—Landing. 61.35 Knowledge test: Prerequisites and Vmu The speed at which the last main passing grades. landing gear leaves the ground. 61.37 Knowledge tests: Cheating or other VR Rotate Speed. unauthorized conduct. VS Stall Speed or minimum speed in the 61.39 Prerequisites for practical tests. stall. 61.41 Flight training received from flight WAT Weight, Altitude, Temperature. instructors not certificated by the FAA. 61.43 Practical tests: General procedures. END QPS REQUIREMENTS 61.45 Practical tests: Required aircraft and equipment. [Doc. No. FAA–2002–12461, 73 FR 26490, May 9, 61.47 Status of an examiner who is author- 2008] ized by the Administrator to conduct practical tests. PART 61—CERTIFICATION: PILOTS, 61.49 Retesting after failure. FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND 61.51 Pilot logbooks. 61.52 Use of aeronautical experience ob- GROUND INSTRUCTORS tained in ultralight vehicles. 61.53 Prohibition on operations during med- SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. ical deficiency. 73 61.55 Second-in-command qualifications. SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. 61.56 Flight review. 100–2 61.57 Recent flight experience: Pilot in com- SPECIAL FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION NO. mand. 118–2 61.58 Pilot-in-command proficiency check: Operation of an aircraft that requires Subpart A—General more than one pilot flight crewmember or is turbojet-powered. Sec. 61.59 Falsification, reproduction, or alter- 61.1 Applicability and definitions. ation of applications, certificates, 61.2 Exercise of Privilege. logbooks, reports, or records. 61.3 Requirement for certificates, ratings, 61.60 Change of address.
    [Show full text]
  • Over Thirty Years After the Wright Brothers
    ver thirty years after the Wright Brothers absolutely right in terms of a so-called “pure” helicop- attained powered, heavier-than-air, fixed-wing ter. However, the quest for speed in rotary-wing flight Oflight in the United States, Germany astounded drove designers to consider another option: the com- the world in 1936 with demonstrations of the vertical pound helicopter. flight capabilities of the side-by-side rotor Focke Fw 61, The definition of a “compound helicopter” is open to which eclipsed all previous attempts at controlled verti- debate (see sidebar). Although many contend that aug- cal flight. However, even its overall performance was mented forward propulsion is all that is necessary to modest, particularly with regards to forward speed. Even place a helicopter in the “compound” category, others after Igor Sikorsky perfected the now-classic configura- insist that it need only possess some form of augment- tion of a large single main rotor and a smaller anti- ed lift, or that it must have both. Focusing on what torque tail rotor a few years later, speed was still limited could be called “propulsive compounds,” the following in comparison to that of the helicopter’s fixed-wing pages provide a broad overview of the different helicop- brethren. Although Sikorsky’s basic design withstood ters that have been flown over the years with some sort the test of time and became the dominant helicopter of auxiliary propulsion unit: one or more propellers or configuration worldwide (approximately 95% today), jet engines. This survey also gives a brief look at the all helicopters currently in service suffer from one pri- ways in which different manufacturers have chosen to mary limitation: the inability to achieve forward speeds approach the problem of increased forward speed while much greater than 200 kt (230 mph).
    [Show full text]
  • DYNAMIC MODELING of AUTOROTATION for SIMULTANEOUS LIFT and WIND ENERGY EXTRACTION by SADAF MACKERTICH B.S. Rochester Institute O
    DYNAMIC MODELING OF AUTOROTATION FOR SIMULTANEOUS LIFT AND WIND ENERGY EXTRACTION by SADAF MACKERTICH B.S. Rochester Institute of Technology, 2012 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2016 Major Professor: Tuhin Das c 2016 Sadaf Mackertich ii ABSTRACT The goal of this thesis is to develop a multi-body dynamics model of autorotation with the objective of studying its application in energy harvesting. A rotor undergoing autorotation is termed an Autogyro. In the autorotation mode, the rotor is unpowered and its interaction with the wind causes an upward thrust force. The theory of an autorotating rotorcraft was originally studied for achieving safe flight at low speeds and later used for safe descent of helicopters under engine failure. The concept can potentially be used as a means to collect high-altitude wind energy. Autorotation is inherently a dynamic process and requires detailed models for characterization. Existing models of autorotation assume steady operating conditions with constant angu- lar velocity of the rotor. The models provide spatially averaged aerodynamic forces and torques. While these steady-autorotation models are used to create a basis for the dynamic model developed in this thesis, the latter uses a Lagrangian formulation to determine the equations of motion. The aerodynamic effects on the blades that produce thrust forces, in- plane torques, and out-of-plane torques, are modeled as non-conservative forces within the Lagrangian framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Access Rules for Balloons
    Easy Access Rules for Balloons EASA eRules: aviation rules for the 21st century Rules and regulations are the core of the European Union civil aviation system. The aim of the EASA eRules project is to make them accessible in an efficient and reliable way to stakeholders. EASA eRules will be a comprehensive, single system for the drafting, sharing and storing of rules. It will be the single source for all aviation safety rules applicable to European airspace users. It will offer easy (online) access to all rules and regulations as well as new and innovative applications such as rulemaking process automation, stakeholder consultation, cross-referencing, and comparison with ICAO and third countries’ standards. To achieve these ambitious objectives, the EASA eRules project is structured in ten modules to cover all aviation rules and innovative functionalities. The EASA eRules system is developed and implemented in close cooperation with Member States and aviation industry to ensure that all its capabilities are relevant and effective. Published September 20201 Copyright notice © European Union, 1998-2020 Except where otherwise stated, reuse of the EUR-Lex data for commercial or non-commercial purposes is authorised provided the source is acknowledged ('© European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/, 1998-2020') 2. Cover page picture: © kadawittfeldarchitektur 1 The published date represents the date when the consolidated version of the document was generated. 2 Euro-Lex, Important Legal Notice: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/legal-notice/legal-notice.html. Powered by EASA eRules Page 2 of 345| Sep 2020 Easy Access Rules for Balloons Disclaimer DISCLAIMER This version is issued by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in order to provide its stakeholders with an updated and easy-to-read publication related to balloons.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AIRCRAFT RULES, 1937 DEPARTMENT of INDUSTRIES and LABOUR NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 23Rd March, 1937
    THE AIRCRAFT RULES, 1937 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND LABOUR NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 23rd March, 1937 Updated: February 17, 2011 No. V-26 - In exercise of the powers conferred by sections 5 and 7 and sub-section (2) of section 8 of the Aircraft Act, 1934 (XXII of 1934) and section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (XIII of 1885), and in supersession of the Indian Aircraft Rules, 1920, with the exception of Part IX thereof, the Central Government is pleased to make the following rules, the same having been previously published, as required by section 14 of the former Act, namely :- TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Preliminary (1 - 3B) PART II General Conditions of Flying (4 - 20) PART III General Safety Conditions (21 - 29D) PART IV Registration and Marking of Aircraft (30 - 37A) PART V Personnel of Aircraft (38 - 48) PART VI Airworthiness (49 - 62) PART VII Radio Telegraph Apparatus (63 - 64) PART VIII Aeronautical Beacons, Ground Lights and False Lights (65 - 66) PART IX Log Books (67 - 67B) PART X Investigation of Accidents (68 - 77A) PART X-A Investigation of Incidents (77B - 77D) PART XI Aerodromes (78 - 92) PART XII Rule 93 to 133 have been deleted PART XII-A Regulatory Provisions (133A) PART XII-B Engineering, Inspection and Normal Requirements for Organisations other than Operation (133B - 133C) PART XIII Air Transport Services and Aerial Work (134 - 153) PART XIII-A Engineering, Inspection and Manual Requirements - Owners or Operators (154 - 155A) PART XIV General (156 - 161) SCHEDULES PART I 1. Short title and extent - (1) These rules may be called the Aircraft Rules, 1937.
    [Show full text]
  • 422 Subpart B—Aircraft Ratings and Pilot Authorizations
    § 61.60 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–10 Edition) (1) Any fraudulent or intentionally ments of this section appropriate to false statement on any application for the additional aircraft rating sought. a certificate, rating, authorization, or (b) Additional aircraft category rating. duplicate thereof, issued under this A person who applies to add a category part; rating to a pilot certificate: (2) Any fraudulent or intentionally (1) Must complete the training and false entry in any logbook, record, or have the applicable aeronautical expe- report that is required to be kept, rience. made, or used to show compliance with (2) Must have a logbook or training any requirement for the issuance or ex- record endorsement from an authorized ercise of the privileges of any certifi- instructor attesting that the person cate, rating, or authorization under was found competent in the appro- this part; priate aeronautical knowledge areas (3) Any reproduction for fraudulent and proficient in the appropriate areas purpose of any certificate, rating, or of operation. authorization, under this part; or (3) Must pass the practical test. (4) Any alteration of any certificate, (4) Need not take an additional rating, or authorization under this knowledge test if the person holds an part. airplane, rotorcraft, powered-lift, or (b) The commission of an act prohib- airship rating at that pilot certificate ited under paragraph (a) of this section level. is a basis for suspending or revoking (c) Additional aircraft class rating. A any airman certificate, rating, or au- person who applies for an additional thorization held by that person. class rating on a pilot certificate: (1) Must have a logbook or training § 61.60 Change of address.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Safety Letter Produce a Flurry of Re-Circulating Snow, Reducing Local Visibility and Causing Whiteout Conditions
    Transport Transports Canada Canada Transport Transports aviation safety in history Canada Canada TP 185E A Issue 1/2008 viation Safety in History 1907—The Helicopter’s Chaotic Beginnings by Guy Houdin, Chief, Aviation Terminology Standardization, Policy and Regulatory Services, Civil Aviation, Transport Canada In those days, the safety of humans and machines was a concept that was buried in the subconscious. What mattered most was rising up, flying in the air, and landing without damaging the machine, or “beating up” the pilot. But first, the sky had to be iation Safety in History conquered and mastered. Av On July 14, 2007, I was watching the military parade, ones to witness this first successful flight, and although celebrating France’s National Day in Paris, on television. others before him—such as Léger in Monaco, Bréguet Approximately one hundred aircraft had been invited to and Vollumard in Douai, France—had some good, but less Snow Landing and Take-off Techniques for Helicopters the event. The airplanes started the procession down the convincing, attempts, historians retained November 13, 1907, Champs-Élysées, followed by the troops on foot and in as the birth date of free flight by a rotary wing aircraft. Throughout the course of winter operations, helicopters face a significant hazard associated with takeoffs, vehicles, and then about 30 helicopters brought up the landings and hovering when the ground is covered with fresh or light snow. The rotor down wash can rear. When you could barely see them, high above the La aviation safety letter produce a flurry of re-circulating snow, reducing local visibility and causing whiteout conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Pilot Training Program
    Private Pilot Training Program 1 Private Pilot Ground School Course Outline and Recommended Material COURSE OUTLINE REVIEW PRIOR TO CLASS Jeppesen PHAK Class Study Material Chapter(s) Chapter(s) 1 Intro/Aircraft Components 2 (A & B) 1, 2, 5, & 6 2 Aerodynamics 3 3 & 4 3 Safety/Airports/Flight Instruments 4 (A & B) 7, 13, & 17 4 Aeronautical Charts 4 (C & D) 14 & 15 (1-2) 5 Radio Communications 5 13 6 FAR/AIM & NTSB FAR/AIM FAR/AIM CFR 49 CFR 49 7 Human Factors/ADM 1 (C) & 10 16 & 17 8 Performance/Weight & Balance 8 (A & B) 9 & 10 9 Weather 6, 7, 8 (C) 11 & 12 10 Flight Planning/Navigation 11 15 RECOMMENDED STUDY MATERIAL Jeppesen Private Pilot Manual FAR/AIM * ASA E6B Flight Computer (manual or electronic) ASA Plotter ASA Flight Planner Instructions * Twin Cities Sectional Aeronautical Chart Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge (FAA-H-8083-25A) * Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-A) * Aviation Weather (AC 00-6A) * Aviation Weather Services (FAA) * Aircraft Weight and Balance Handbook (FAA-H-8083-1A) * CFR 49 Part 830 NTSB Requirements * CFR 14 Parts 60-109 * CFR 14 Parts 110-199 * FAA Airport Markings Poster (OK-08-0403) * Private Pilot PTS 2011 (FAA-S-8081-14B)* 2 WELCOME TO THE PRIVATE PILOT GROUND SCHOOL Thank you for attending our comprehensive ground school. This class will satisfy the FAA ground training element required to become a Private Pilot. We will be using the Jeppesen-Sanderson Private Pilot Manual as a general guide for the course. Questions are always encouraged, take notes, and enjoy the class.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamic Concept of the Uav in the Gyrodyne Configuration
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF AVIATION 1 (250) 2018, pp. 49–66 DOI: 10.2478/tar-2018-0005 © Copyright by Wydawnictwa Naukowe Instytutu Lotnictwa AERODYNAMIC CONCEPT OF THE UAV IN THE GYRODYNE CONFIGURATION Jan Muchowski*, Marek Szumski*, Andrzej Krzysiak** *Department of Fluid Mechanics and Aerodynamics, Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-959 Rzeszow **Aerodynamics Department, Institute of Aviation, Al. Krakowska 110/114, 02-256 Warsaw [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], Abstract The article presents an aerodynamic concept of UAV in the gyrodyne configuration, as a more efficient one than the currently used UAV airframe configuration applied for monitoring tasks of pow- er lines and railway infrastructure. A sample task which is realised by conceptual gyrodyne based on monitoring aerial power lines was characterised and described . The assumed idea of UAV was shown in comparison to the currently used aircraft configuration presented in the introduction. Referring to momentum theory, hover efficiency of the multicopter and the helicopter was evaluated. In relation to the helicopter, an initial draft of the airframe conception accompanied by a description of advan- tages of the gyrodyne configuration was exposed. Problems related to the gyrodyne configuration were emphasised in the summary. Keywords: aerodynamic concept, UAV, VTOL, gyrodyne, airframe configuration 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years a dynamic growth of the UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) usage in civil and mili- tary missions can be observed . Economic aspects are the main reasons of that increase, i.e. the purchas- ing cost of the UAS (Unmanned Aircraft System) varies from 40% up to 80% of the manned system cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Analysis of the Slowed-Rotor Compound Helicopter Configuration
    Performance Analysis of the Slowed-Rotor Compound Helicopter Configuration Matthew W. Floros Wayne Johnson Raytheon ITSS Army/NASA Rotorcraft Division Moffett Field, California NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California The calculated performance of a slowed-rotor compound aircraft, particularly at high flight speeds, is exam- ined. Correlation of calculated and measured performance is presented for a NASA Langley high advance ratio test and the McDonnell XV-1 demonstrator to establish the capability to model rotors in such flight conditions. The predicted performance of a slowed-rotor vehicle model based on the CarterCopter Technology Demonstra- tor is examined in detail. An isolated rotor model and a model of a rotor and wing are considered. Three tip speeds and a range of collective pitch settings are investigated. A tip Mach number of 0.2 and zero collective pitch are found to be the optimum condition to minimize rotor drag. Performance is examined for both sea level and cruise altitude conditions. Nomenclature Much work has been focused on tilt rotor aircraft; both military and civilian tilt rotors are currently in development. But other configurations may provide comparable benefits to CT thrust coefficient tilt rotors in terms of range and speed. Two such configura- CQ torque coefficient tions are the compound helicopter and the autogyro. These CH longitudinal inplane force coefficient configurations provide STOL or VTOL capability, but are ca- D drag pable of higher speeds than a conventional helicopter because L lift the rotor does not provide the propulsive force or at high MTIP tip Mach number speed, the vehicle lift. The drawback is that redundant lift VT tip speed and/or propulsion add weight and drag which must be com- q dynamic pressure pensated for in some other way.
    [Show full text]