DOCSLIB.ORG

ST MARY's CENTRE Annual Report WE REDUCE VIOLENCE WE SAVE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ST MARY's CENTRE Annual Report WE REDUCE VIOLENCE WE SAVE WE REDUCE VIOLENCE WE SAVE LIVES ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report June 2018 to June 2019 St Mary’s Centre (smc) works with vulnerable young people aged 12-25 facing daily threats of violence, kidnap and death in northwest London. We work in local housing estates, schools, pupil referral units and prisons. We have 12 years’ proven record of violence reduction. We care for young people who have nowhere else to go. CONTENTS Who we are 1 What we do 7 Our impact 19 We need to do more 25 bCOVER IMAGE: ALEXEY FEDORENKO ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report 1 Who we are Our 4 promises Where we work We have a Youth Work Manager, We are here for you a Youth Worker and two part time Young Women’s Workers. Our St Mary’s Centre Youth Workers are on call 24x7x365 including team is supported by young adult Christmas Day. volunteers. Local professionals fund raise and manage our service freely. 1 Jason Allen Youth Work Manager We stick with you St Mary’s Centre will stay with you without condition until the age of 25. Emile Libock Youth Worker 2 We come to you St Mary’s Centre will come to meet ESTATES SCHOOLS Sara Beshira you in your home, community, school 1 South Kilburn A UCL Academy Young Women’s Worker or prison. Wherever you go, we 2 Rowley Way B St Paul’s Primary School follow you. 3 Lithos Road C Haverstock School 4 Swiss Cottage D CCFL (Pupil Referral Unit) 3 5 Chalcot Camilla Ferdinand 6 Fleet Young Women’s Worker We do everything we 7 Queen’s Crescent can to keep you safe 8 Denton Violence reduction is at the core of 9 Chalk Farm our work. We specialise in working 10 Castle Haven with young people our Youth Work 11 Peckwater (Kentish Town) Manager calls ‘not just the at risk, but the risk’. 12 Agar Grove 13 Combo/Regent’s Park 4 14 Somers Town 2 ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report 3 They have been What do partner services say about us? successful in reaching our most hard to reach students…St Mary’s CAMDEN CENTRE FOR LEARNING never gives up! We talked with Jeanette Lowe, community, and through this they have remained engaged with them the Centre’s Director are able to secure the confidence when other services have fallen away and trust of the young people and or have closed the case because the How does St Mary’s their families. Their presence and young person is not engaging. contribute to your work involvement in the community St Mary’s never gives up! as a school? means they can often anticipate St Mary’s has been providing Health disputes and diffuse situations before What would you like to & Fitness and Drama sessions to they arise, avoiding the escalation of see happen next? the school this year. Through these potential conflicts. We want to continue to develop our they have been able to identify partnership with St Mary’s, working young people who are in need of What is being achieved? to ensure that our most vulnerable Camden Centre for Learning is The students at CCfL include cohort – who we often lose to Camden’s educational provision targeted mentoring because of their for secondary aged children and vulnerability to criminal exploitation some of the most vulnerable and the streets, violence and criminal young people whose primary in the community. The mentoring at risk students in Camden. The activity – are engaged in education, need is their social, emotional service – the only one we are aware mentors from St Mary’s that have achieving and succeeding, and most or mental health development. of which is available to young people been attached to our students have importantly, safe. It is made up of three specialist 24/7 – has enabled St Mary’s to keep been able to form highly effective services: our young people safe and divert and positive relationships with this them away from potentially high risk cohort, some of whom are either on • SEMH Special School • KS3 Pupil Referral Unit situations. the fringes or are already embedded • KS4 Pupil Referral Unit in anti-social behaviour and criminal Why does it matter? exploitation. The mentors help The service is so important for the our young people to develop their young people at our school because self-esteem, their resilience and the many of them do not have a positive skills and confidence they need to adult they can turn to when they are make more positive choices. They feeling vulnerable and unsafe. The have been successful in reaching mentors are very active in the local our most hard to reach students and 4 ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report 5 Why are we needed? What we do Statistics show that crime is Poverty in our area worsening. Fewer safe places 30% of young people live in poverty in exist for young people on the our 3 local wards www.cuf.org.uk streets of London. This amounts to 4,600 youth. SMC estimates 20% of the 4,600 would benefit from our intensive 1:1 mentoring. SMC could work with 920 more young people. Crime 30% of our local children and 16% increase in knife crime in London young people live 2017-18 Met Police in poverty 12% increase in homicide in London, costing the taxpayer £3.2 million that’s Home Office 4,600 youth Youth who experience 4 or more Adverse living in poverty Childhood Experiences are 10 times more likely to be involved in violence every year by the time they are 18 20% of them are Commission on Youth Violence (CYV) estimated to In the CYV Safer Lives Survey, only 46% need our of young people would ask the police for services advice when worried about crime we could Youth services work with 81 youth clubs have closed in London 920 since 2011 London’s Lost Youth Services, 2018 more Youth centres are cited as the number one factor that make young people feel young people safer Safer Lives Survey, CYV 6 ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report 7 Violence reduction in communities When things go wrong: and on the streets how we respond to a crisis Why? Where? Contact Identify When crimes are committed there We meet and mentor young people is a ‘wall of silence’ between ‘young in 14 local housing estates including Young people reach Youth worker identifies people and support services’.* SMC the challenging Peckwater and out to a trusted youth close friends of victim worker to report and those who need to are among few professionals who are Queen’s Crescent estates. We host an incident be contacted immediately trusted by both sides and effectively a drop-in session at SMC every to support them in a communicate with young people in Friday. We have an Open Door policy 1 time of trauma danger. throughout the week. Calm 2 What? Who? Youth workers use time in SMC Workers work hard to Our two full time Youth Workers conversation to help young Engage communicate with residents and work intensively with on average people think things through, discover problems and dangers 20 young people each. Our Young reduce high emotions Contact with young people that young people face. We build Women’s Workers have built a Priority is to prevent reprisals is by phone first relationships and strengthen young growing new cohort of 10 young or further acts of violence Face to face time if possible people’s resolve so as not to give in women. SMC is always clear about Youth workers always go sharing important information to destructive peer pressure. Each to young people where to protect all parties they feel safe Youth Worker mentors at risk individuals for around 10 to 15 hours 3 4 a week. Bring together Key young people are invited to take part in group work to process what has happened Residential trip planning to take them away from volatile situations, expedited if need be. Priority given for family members and close friends. Youth workers continue to monitor at risk youth *Commission on Youth Violence 5 8 ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report 9 Schools Why? Who? Persistent disruptive behaviour and Our Support Youth Worker works physical assault against adults and with 15 pupils weekly. Our Young pupils are the most common reasons Women’s Worker is now building a for temporary and permanent new cohort of 5-10 young women. exclusions*. Research puts the cost of a school exclusion at £370,000** to society. What? Youth Workers work with local schools to identify pupils at high Research puts the risk of exclusion and violence. With cost of a school pupils we discuss relationships, exclusion at choices, triggers, patterns of £370,000 behaviour and how to pre-empt dangerous situations. Where? St Mary’s Centre works in UCL Academy and Haverstock School twice weekly. *www.gov.uk/government/statistics/ permanent-and-fixed-period-exclusions-in- england-2016-to-2017 **Institute for Public Policy Research, October 2017 www.ippr.org/files/2017- 10/making-the-difference-report- october-2017.pdf 10 ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report ST MARY’S CENTRE Annual Report 11 Pupil Referral Units and Prisons Why? Who? St Mary’s Centre intensive 1:1 SMC works with 10 young people mentoring support lowers the at CCFL.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The London Framework
    OFFICE OF THE VICE-PROVOST (ADVANCEMENT) PRO-VICE-PROVOST (LONDON) THE LONDON FRAMEWORK November 2020 Professor Alan Thompson, Dean of Brain Sciences and Pro-Vice-Provost (London) Amy Lightstone, Head of Engagement and Operations (London) The London Framework: Creating Purpose, Connecting People, Celebrating Place In my role as Pro-Vice-Provost (London) and focussed activity which UCL staff carry out in conjunction with the London Advisory for the mutual benefit of London, as well as Group, I have spent the past year leading coordinate and enhance relationships with the development of the London Framework London and Londoners. Additionally the and the creation of the Pro-Vice-Provost London Framework will explore how (London) Office, based within the Office of London and its communities enrich UCL and the Vice-Provost (Advancement). enhance its Mission. The London Framework is a core document I endeavour to align the work of the London setting out the key principles which define Framework and my role as Pro-Vice-Provost the purpose of UCL London. These (London) with UCL’s Pro-Vice-Provost (UK) principles outline how and why we engage and Pro-Vice-Provost (International), as with our audiences in London, as well as a well as working closely with Public Affairs, way of working for UCL in London. In the Faculties, Vice-Provosts Offices, Framework we explore how we are Professional Services and importantly our governed, our delivery priorities and how students in order to advance UCL’s position we will measure our success. as London’s Global University. I recognise that many of UCL’s departments This Framework is intended to be a key and faculties are already working in and for document which demonstrates UCL’s core London and the London Framework will commitment to the capital and which is a support UCL colleagues to engage and fantastic platform to showcase our interact with London, bridge connections engagement with London.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synthesis of Research Addressing Children's, Young People's And
    FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2006 A synthesis of research addressing children’s, young people’s and parents’ views of walking and cycling for transport The Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre) is part of the Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London AUTHORS Ginny Brunton, Sandy Oliver, Kathryn Oliver, Theo Lorenc ADVISORY GROUP MEMBERSHIP David Banister Professor of Transport Planning, Bartlett School of Planning, University College, London Tracey Budd Principal Research Officer, Statistics – Travel, Department for Transport Andy Cope Research and Monitoring Unit Manager, Sustrans Hugo Crombie Public Health Advisor, Centre for Public Health Excellence, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Tom Franklin Chief Executive, Living Streets David Ogilvie MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow Harry Rutter Head of Health Impact Assessment Unit, South East Public Health Observatory, Oxford Claire Spink Policy Customer, Department for Transport Paul Stonebrook Health Improvement Directorate, National Programme Delivery, Department of Health Sandra Williams Senior Principal Research Officer, Research and Development, Standards and Quality Group, Department of Health CONFLICTS OF INTEREST None ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The review described in this report is one of a series undertaken by the Health Promotion and Public Health Reviews Facility at the EPPI-Centre to inform the evidence base for a range of strategies to promote public health. The views expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health. i Funding This report was funded by the Department of Health (England) as part of a three- year programme of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Ed
    Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Teaching ‘… an admirable testament to UCL’s ambition to foster innovative, evidence-based and thoughtful approaches to teaching and learning. There is much to learn from here.’— Professor Karen O’Brien, Head of the Humanities Division, University of Oxford ‘Research and teaching’ is a typical response to the question, ‘What are universities for?’ For most people, one comes to mind more quickly than the other. Most undergraduate students will think of teaching, while PhD students will think of research. University staff will have similarly varied reactions depending on their roles. Emphasis on one or the other has also changed over time according to governmental incentives and pressure. Davies and Norbert Pachler ed. Jason P. For some decades, higher education has been bringing the two closer together, to the point of them overlapping, by treating students as partners and nding ways of having them learn through undertaking research. Drawing on a range of examples from across the disciplines, this collection demonstrates how one research-rich university, University College London (UCL), has set up initiatives to raise the pro le of teaching and give it parity with research. It explains what staff and students have done to create an environment in which students can learn by discovery, through research- based education. ‘… an exemplary text of its kind, offering much to dwell on to all interested in advancing university education.’— Ronald Barnett, Emeritus Professor of Higher Education, University College London Institute of Education Dr Jason P. Davies is a Senior Teaching Fellow at the UCL Arena Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Years of UCL Grand Challenges, Connect, Inspire, and Prepare for the Unexpected
    UCL GRAND CHALLENGES OFFICE OF THE VICE-PROVOST (RESEARCH) UCL Grand Challenges Over 10 years of Developing Solutions Contents Foreword 04 About UCL Grand Challenges 06 UCL Grand Challenges: A Timeline 07 UCL Grand Challenges in Numbers 08 UCL Grand Challenges Programme Academic Leads 09 UCL Grand Challenge of Global Health 10 UCL Grand Challenge of Sustainable Cities 21 UCL Grand Challenge of Cultural Understanding 28 UCL Grand Challenge of Human Wellbeing 37 UCL Grand Challenge of Justice & Equality 45 UCL Grand Challenge of Transformative Technology 53 Reflections on UCL Grand Challenges and the Future 60 3 Foreword For more than a decade, UCL Grand Challenges has brought researchers from across UCL together to tackle myriad issues the world faces. From non-communicable diseases, energy and structural inequalities, the Grand Challenges initiative itself and its funded projects have shone a light on the critical importance of cross-disciplinary perspectives and expertise in effectively addressing challenges from the local to the global level. More recently, the importance of this approach has been made clear by the COVID-19 pandemic, with the need to include a broad range of expertise in decision-making highlighted as the only effective way forward. I am immensely proud of the work that the Grand Challenges team and the researchers involved in Professor David Price Grand Challenges projects have undertaken over Vice-Provost (Research) the last decade; from the creation of the Global Disability Innovation Hub and the Centre for Behaviour Change to the Lancet Lecture series, our past decade, albeit on a much larger scale. As a work on structural inequalities, and the Connected result, UCL as a whole is better equipped to help Curriculum at UCL Academy, Grand Challenges the world recover from this crisis and prepare work has resulted in lasting collaborations that will to take the first steps towards a more equitable, generate impact and catalyse positive change well inclusive, sustainable and resilient world.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Hijabs Really a Statement of Your School's Values and Ethos?
    Are hijabs really a statement of your school’s values and ethos? By Elaine Chambers I recently went on a tour of a new academy school in my area, the UCL Academy in Swiss Cottage. It is sponsored by University College London, a specifically secular university. After the visit, I wrote to the head teacher – and this is the correspondence that resulted. Dear Mr Street, Re: UCL Academy Swiss Cottage Thank you for meeting the local community and showing us around a really magnificent state of the art school. We missed out the library, perhaps this can be viewed next time? There is however a matter about which I felt somewhat queasy, especially as your building, its staff, and its ethos is determined to look to the future. The point I brought up could not be dealt with at this public meeting because it was regarded as somewhat sensitive, and the word 'political' was expressed in a manner that was once reserved for sexual matters. So, I have confined my concern to electronic print in the hope that it will be given serious thought, and respectfully, a comprehensive response. My concern does involve matters of sexuality, or more precisely gender. It is political. It is of major political importance worldwide, as well as locally, that we address gender prejudice and violence in this, the 21st century. We need to confront, with a morality that reflects a humane determination, the horrific record of violence against women and girls carried out in the self-interest of so called patriarchal 'needs'; most noticeably upheld by religions.
    [Show full text]
  • The UCL Academy Adelaide Road, Camden, NW3 3AD
    School report The UCL Academy Adelaide Road, Camden, NW3 3AD Inspection dates 15−16 May 2014 Previous inspection: Not previously inspected Overall effectiveness This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because Too many students in Years 7 and 8 are not Some subjects in Years 7 and 8 do not provide making good progress across most subjects. sufficient opportunities to develop students’ This includes some of the most able and writing skills. some with low starting points. Leaders’ impact on improvements to teaching Gaps in the progress of Years 7 and 8 and achievement require improvement because students are emerging. Many students plans for improvement are too imprecise. They supported by the pupil premium funding and do not make it clear how much impact leaders some with special educational needs are hope to have as a result of their actions. making less progress than others. Governors do not hold leaders to account The sixth form requires improvement. enough. They are not always given detailed Leaders’ efforts to improve achievement have enough information about students’ been successful for some students, but too achievement to help them understand how well many have not made good progress over the school is doing. time. Leaders do not use the pupil premium or Year Not enough teaching over time has provided 7 catch-up funding effectively enough.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 Published February 2018 Challenge Partners is a Contents 1. THE PARTNERSHIP 2 practitioner-led education About Challenge Partners 3 Message from the Chief Executive 4 charity that enables Our principles and approach 6 collaboration between Challenge Partners by numbers 10 2. OUR COLLECTIVE AIMS 12 It is possible to have both excellence 13 schools to enhance the and equity in our education system Our aims 16 life chances of all children, Impact and performance against our aims 17 3. THE PROGRAMMES 20 especially the most Our programmes 21 The Network of Excellence 22 disadvantaged. Hubs 24 The Quality Assurance Review 27 Leadership Development Days 32 Leadership Residency Programme 32 School Support Directory 32 Events 33 Challenge the Gap 34 Getting Ahead London 40 EAL in the mainstream classroom 43 4. FINANCES 44 Income and expenditure 44 5. LOOKING FORWARD 45 6. LIST OF CHALLENGE PARTNERS SCHOOLS 46 1. The partnership About Challenge Partners Challenge Partners is a practitioner-led education charity that enables collaborative school improvement networks to enhance the life chances of all children, especially the most disadvantaged. Challenge Partners was formed to continue the learning which emerged from the development of Teaching Schools that evolved out of the London Challenge. Since its formation in 2011, the outcomes for pupils in Challenge Partners schools have consistently improved faster than the national average. We provide networks and programmes that facilitate sustainable collaboration and challenge between schools in order to underpin improvements in outcomes which would not be possible for a school, or group of schools, to achieve as effectively on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Ucs Partnership and Outreach Review
    UCS PARTNERSHIP AND OUTREACH REVIEW 2019–20 Introduction UCS Hampstead is a leading London committed to ensuring that the school day school that combines the highest plays a key role in the local community. standards of academic achievement We currently work in partnership and pastoral care with outstanding with over 20 schools at primary and facilities for all-round education with a secondary levels and we support a distinctive liberal ethos. number of other charitable organisations across the capital. From its beginning 190 years ago, UCS has had at its core a commitment In this brochure, we aim to highlight to access, with a pledge that religion much of the partnership work that was should be no bar to entry. In the 21st undertaken during 2019–20. The closure century, we add a further commitment of schools during lockdown meant that a – that the education we provide will not number of regular partnership events be restricted solely to those who can could not take place but they were afford it. UCS consistently ranks at the replaced in our provision by other top of independent schools in London initiatives which we hope will become for the number of 100% means-tested mainstays of the programme even after bursaries awarded each year, and over social distancing regulations are relaxed. the last three years it has provided the equivalent of £1.2 million per annum in We are always looking to broaden our bursary support. partnership provision and if you would like further information, please do not In addition to this support for hesitate to contact us.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Be an Engineer: the Role of School Leadership
    Learning to be an engineer: the role of school leadership October 2018 Learning to be an engineer: the role of school leadership A report for the Royal Academy of Engineering October 2018 ISBN: 978-1-909327-43-6 To cite this report please use: Lucas, B. and Hanson, J. (2018) Learning to be an engineer: the role of school leadership. London: Royal Academy of Engineering © Royal Academy of Engineering 2018 Available to download from: www.raeng.org.uk/ehom-leadership Authors Acknowledgements Professor Bill Lucas The authors would like to thank: Dr Janet Hanson The education team at the Royal Academy of Engineering: Dr Rhys Morgan, Scott Atkinson, Rebecca Hill, Maya Desai and Charlotte Freeman. About the Centre for Real-World Learning at the University of Winchester (CRL) Expert advisers: Dr David Barlex, Ed Chambers, Dan www.winchester.ac.uk/realworldlearning Cook, Jamie Costello, Peter Finegold, Ian Jones, Andy Keaney, Carl Leech, Georgina Mulhall, Jonathan Nicholls, CRL is an applied research centre focusing on the Chris Rochester. teaching of learning dispositions. Its ground-breaking work in identifying creative habits of mind has been Schools: Bohunt School, Christ the King RC Primary influential in the decision by the Organisation for School, Falinge Park High School, Gomer Junior School, Economic Development (OECD) to introduce the 2021 Onthank Primary School, Penwortham Priory Academy, PISA Test of Creative Thinking. Star Academy, Sutton Grammar School, UCL Academy, UTC Sheffield City Centre. Earlier research for the Royal Academy of Engineering proposed six engineering habits of mind in Thinking The Comino Foundation for its continuing support like an engineer and subsequently demonstrated how of our work in developing young people’s personal and these could be implemented in schools in England and practical capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Strategy and Operations Office of the Vice-Provost (Advancement)
    Director of Strategy and Operations Office of the Vice-Provost (Advancement) Candidate Pack 1 4 x 2 hour coaching sessions Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. About UCL 4 3. About the Role 14 4. Person Specification 17 5. How to apply 19 4 x 2 hour coaching sessions 1. Introduction At UCL, we do things differently. We know the stakes are high, but we are not afraid to take risks or to drive change. A cure for cancer. A revolution in dementia care. A new approach to global economics. Scholarships for outstanding students. All these things are possible. Our job – your job – is to make them happen. The Office of the Vice-Provost, Advancement (OVPA) manages UCL’s philanthropic relationships and engagement with alumni and supporter audiences. We recently closed UCL’s It’s All Academic Campaign, having raised more than £624m and inspired over 263,000 volunteering hours to help UCL, our students and our alumni community. We plan to keep delivering fundraising and alumni engagement on the same scale as we move towards the launch of our next campaign. We are supported by UCL’s clear strategy for the future and sustained investment in OVPA that has given us the resources and staff we need to achieve excellence. What does this mean in practice? It means top- level support from UCL’s senior team, including active leadership and participation in fundraising and advancement from UCL’s new President & Provost, Dr Michael Spence, and it means engagement across the academic and professional services community. It means giving talented people the tools they need to find new solutions to do what they do best.
    [Show full text]
  • The UCL Academy
    School report The UCL Academy Adelaide Road, Swiss Cottage, Camden NW3 3AQ Inspection dates 23–24 June 2016 Overall effectiveness Good Effectiveness of leadership and management Good Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good Outcomes for pupils Good 16 to 19 study programmes Good Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school Leaders set high expectations of pupils and staff. School information shows that progress for almost This has resulted in a culture of respect, which is all groups of pupils is good or better. Pupils from evident across the school. disadvantaged backgrounds and those who have The governing body supports and challenges special educational needs or disabilities make leaders rigorously. Governors have benefited from good progress. external support which has sharpened their Leaders have developed a broad and balanced understanding of information about the school. curriculum with a focus on science, technology, Pupils are proud of the school. They are keen to engineering and mathematics. come to school because they are well cared for. The school has developed a rigorous system of The academy sponsor provides a range of training for staff, which ensures that teaching and academic opportunities for pupils through the learning are constantly improving. development of the ‘Encounters with Excellence’ programme. This offers pupils exciting exposure to Students’ progress in the sixth form is improving university life. as a result of good teaching. Leaders have developed a robust assessment Safeguarding is effective. There are some aspects system using ‘I Can’ statements, which pupils and of exemplary practice in the recruitment process parents understand and find easy to use.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Camden
    APPENDIX 2 2014 SCHOOL PLACE PLANNING REPORT CONTENTS This report uses the 2013 GLA Camden Development Population Projections (March 2014), 2014 GLA School Roll Projections (June 2014) and actual roll data from the January 2014 and May 2014 DfE School Census. Secondary Main Report 1. Introduction Page 2 2. Net capacity/surplus and numbers on roll Page 3 3. Birth rates Page 5 4. Planned housing development Page 6 5. GLA Population projections Page 11 6. GLA school roll projections Page 16 7. Cross-border movement Page 20 8. Independent schools Page 22 9. Neighbouring LAs known pressures and plans Page 23 10. Conclusions Page 25 Appendices A. Camden’s Development Trajectory (growth areas) Page 27 B_1. Flowchart of GLA Population Projections Cycle Page 28 B_2. GLA Flow Diagram of GLA School Roll Projection Service Page 29 C. MAP: Secondary Schools by Camden Wards Page 30 D. Appendix D - Secondary School Places Planning Report tables are supplied as an attachment and should be read in conjunction with this report, these include; Table D1 - School Capacity Collection 2014 Summary (provisional) Table D2_1 - Percentage of Secondary Places Filled by Year Group: Jan 2013 Table D2_2 - Percentage of Secondary Places Filled by Year Group: Jan 2014 Table D3 - 2012/13-2014/15 Year 7 Secondary Offer Summary - as at Offer Day (R1) Table D4_1 to D4_4 - Additional Child Yield from Identified Sites and Windfall combined 2014 including Table D5 - 2013 Camden Population Projections Age 11/Age 11-15 by ward Table D6 - 2012-2014 GLA School Roll Projections (SRP) Table D7 - Resident Population of Camden Secondary School's: Jan 2014 Table D8 - Camden residents attending Camden and Other Borough (OB) provision January 2012 to January 2014 1 SECONDARY PLACES PLANNING: Report July 2014 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This report provides an update on Camden’s secondary places planning, taking account of the latest population projections (2013 GLA Camden Development March 2014), GLA school roll projections (SRP - 2014) and housing development data (Camden Culture & Environment - May 2014).
    [Show full text]