The Pennsylvania State University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Pennsylvania State University The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School GENETIC AND PHENOTYPIC SPATIAL VARIATION AMONG PLANT POPULATIONS A Dissertation in Plant Biology by Victoria Lynn DeLeo 2020 Victoria Lynn DeLeo Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2020 The dissertation of Victoria Lynn DeLeo was reviewed and approved by the following: Jesse R. Lasky Assistant Professor of Biology Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee John E. Carlson Professor of Plant Science and Ecosystem Science and Management Professor of Molecular Genetics and Director, Schatz Center for Tree Molecular Genetics Tanya Renner Assistant Professor of Entomology Liana T. Burghardt Assistant Professor of Plant Science Dorothy Foehr Huck & J. Lloyd Huck Early Career Chair Teh-hui Kao Distinguished Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Chair of the Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Plant Biology iii ABSTRACT Evolution acts at the level of populations. From differences in allele frequencies or trait frequencies among populations, we can make inferences about the forces that are most important in selection and gene flow at a specific point in time for specific systems. In this dissertation, I used Arabidopsis thaliana and tropical trees to investigate variation in response to abiotic pressures across populations. I considered two of the biotic pressures that constrain abiotic adaptation: life history traits and animal dispersers. I modeled phenotypic change across a continent through time in response to understand how phenotypes vary in response to climate. Next, I modeled genetic phenological traits within and among populations and compared to phenological variation in the wild to examine the source of this potentially adaptive variation. Finally, I compared population structure between Metopium toxiferum and Bursera simaruba to investigate the importance of an abundant avian disperser in moving seeds across the landscape. I found regional differences in Arabidopsis response to abiotic pressures and evidence that some phenotypic change is constrained by axes of life history variation. I showed that genetic traits explain phenology trait distributions in the wild. I discovered that the large differences in population genetics between two tropical trees was not clearly related to the nesting behavior of an avian disperser. The patterns of variation we see across populations and along environmental gradients are likely shaped both by trait covariation within species and by community interactions. I argue that phenology has played a role in both of these factors and is an important consideration in plant adaptation at the population level. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... xvi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... xviii Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2 Effects of two centuries of global environmental variation on phenology and physiology of Arabidopsis thaliana ................................................................................. 3 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................... 10 Samples .................................................................................................................... 10 Leaf traits ................................................................................................................. 11 Phenology ................................................................................................................. 12 Statistical analysis .................................................................................................... 13 Results .............................................................................................................................. 17 Distribution of samples through time and space ...................................................... 17 Correlations among phenotypes (question 1) ........................................................... 19 Spatial variation in long-term average phenotypes (questions 2 and 3) ................... 19 Temporal change in phenotypes ............................................................................... 22 Phenotype associations with spatiotemporal climate gradients (questions 2 and 3) ....................................................................................................................... 24 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 27 Intraspecific variation in life history and physiology shows little coordination along a single major axis (question 1) .............................................................. 28 Arabidopsis life history and physiology vary across spatial environmental gradients, suggesting adaptive responses to long-term environmental conditions (question 2) ..................................................................................... 29 Physiology, lack of correspondence to the Leaf Economic Spectrum ..................... 30 Phenology, high variation across space .................................................................... 32 Changes in Arabidopsis life history and physiology over the last two centuries track climate, suggesting adaptive responses (question 3) ............................... 32 Our approach, technical limitations in herbaria data to surmount in future studies ............................................................................................................... 35 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 36 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 36 References ........................................................................................................................ 37 Chapter 3 Genetic variation in phenology describes observed phenological variation in wild Arabidopsis thaliana populations ............................................................................ 38 Abstract ............................................................................................................................ 38 v Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 39 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................... 43 Phenology data in the literature ................................................................................ 43 Additional flowering time and dormancy measurements ......................................... 44 Wild phenology ........................................................................................................ 45 Modelling collection day from genetic phenology ................................................... 46 Prediction of flowering time across native range with Generalized Additive Models .............................................................................................................. 47 Comparison of models ............................................................................................. 49 Flowering time distribution across native range ...................................................... 50 Maternal source effects ............................................................................................ 50 Results .............................................................................................................................. 51 Covariation in genetic phenology traits.................................................................... 51 Modelling wild phenology from genetic phenology values: .................................... 52 Genetic flowering time predicted by landscape flowering time ............................... 55 Does variance in genetic phenology in a region predict the variance of wild flowering times? ............................................................................................... 56 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 61 Genetic variation in flowering time and dormancy can weakly predict variation in wild phenology among populations ............................................................. 63 Variation in genetic phenology can predict variation in wild phenology within populations ....................................................................................................... 64 Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 67 Acknowledgements .........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Venomous and Poisonous Critters
    Quick Dangerous Florida Arachnid Guide Widow Spiders - 4 species in Florida - Latrodectus spp Brown, red, N black and S black widows Bite: No mark. Pain like a needle stick. Muscle twitching/spasms, cramps, vomiting, sweating, headache, severe trunk pain. Cleanse with soap & water.Cool compresses. Emergency department for observation and treatment. " " A young red widow An adult black widow Recluse Spiders - 3 Species seen, but not established - Loxosceles Brown, Chilean, and Mediterranean recluses found in Florida, but very uncommon. Also called Violin or Fiddleback Spider. A brown spider no larger than a quarter, with a dark brown violin shape on its back. Has six eyes. Bite: Red rings around black blister, appears infected. Swollen & painful. Takes a long " " time to heal completely. Fever, chills, nausea Closeup of the fiddle and vomiting, itching, brown urine. marking and six eyes Cleanse with soap & water. Emergency department or physician for tetanus booster or wound treatment if needed. Scorpions - 3 species found in Florida Florida bark, Guiana striped, Hentz striped Lobster-shaped brown or black body with a stinger on tail. Florida scorpions are NOT deadly venomous. But stings can cause pain and possible adverse allergic reactions. " Cleanse with soap & water. Apply ice. Quick Florida Tick Guide Lone Star Tick - Amblyomma americanum Larvae: June-November Nymphs: February-October Adults: April-August (peak in July) Diseases: Ehrlichiosis/Anaplasmosis, STARI, Tularemia " American Dog Tick - Dermacentor variabilis Larvae: July-February Nymphs: January-March Adults: March-September " Diseases: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, Tularemia Black-Legged/Deer Tick - Ixodes scapularis April-August: Larvae and Nymphs September-May: Adults Diseases: Lyme Disease, Babesiosis, Human anaplasmosis " Gulf Coast Tick - Amblyomma maculatum Nymphs: February-August Adults: March-November Diseases: Rickettsia parkeri " Brown Dog Tick - Rickettsia parkeri Diseases: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever " Always check for ticks ASAP before they have time to attach.
    [Show full text]
  • SFRC T-593 Phenology of Flowering and Fruiting
    Report T-593 Phenology of Flowering an Fruiting In Pia t Com unities of Everglades NP and Biscayne N , orida RESOURCE MANAGEMENT EVERGLi\DES NATIONAL PARK BOX 279 NOMESTEAD, FLORIDA 33030 Everglades National Park, South Florida Research Center, P.O. Box 279, Homestead, Florida 33030 PHENOLOGY OF FLOWERING AND FRUITING IN PLANT COMMUNITIES OF EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK AND BISCAYNE NATIONAL MONUMENT, FLORIDA Report T - 593 Lloyd L. Loope U.S. National P ark Service South Florida Research Center Everglades National Park Homestead, Florida 33030 June 1980 Loope, Lloyd L. 1980. Phenology of Flowering and Fruiting in Plant Communities of Everglades National Park and Biscayne National Monument, Florida. South Florida Research Center Report T - 593. 50 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES • ii LIST OF FIGU RES iv INTRODUCTION • 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. • 1 METHODS. • • • • • • • 1 CLIMATE AND WATER LEVELS FOR 1978 •• . 3 RESULTS ••• 3 DISCUSSION. 3 The need and mechanisms for synchronization of reproductive activity . 3 Tropical hardwood forest. • • 5 Freshwater wetlands 5 Mangrove vegetation 6 Successional vegetation on abandoned farmland. • 6 Miami Rock Ridge pineland. 7 SUMMARY ••••• 7 LITERATURE CITED 8 i LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Climatic data for Homestead Experiment Station, 1978 . • . • . • . • . • . • . 10 Table 2. Climatic data for Tamiami Trail at 40-Mile Bend, 1978 11 Table 3. Climatic data for Flamingo, 1978. • • • • • • • • • 12 Table 4. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, area of Elliott Key Marina, Biscayne National Monument, 1978 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Table 5. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, Bear Lake Trail, Everglades National Park (ENP), 1978 • . • . • . 17 Table 6. Flowering and fruiting phenology, tropical hardwood hammock, Mahogany Hammock, ENP, 1978.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article: Life History and Host Range of Prochoerodes Onustaria, an Unsuitable Classical Biological Control Agent of Brazilian Peppertree
    Biocontrol Science and Technology ISSN: 0958-3157 (Print) 1360-0478 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbst20 Research article: life history and host range of Prochoerodes onustaria, an unsuitable classical biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree E. Jones & G. S. Wheeler To cite this article: E. Jones & G. S. Wheeler (2017) Research article: life history and host range of Prochoerodes onustaria, an unsuitable classical biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree, Biocontrol Science and Technology, 27:4, 565-580, DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2017.1325837 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2017.1325837 Published online: 16 May 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 24 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cbst20 Download by: [University of Florida] Date: 13 July 2017, At: 08:24 BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017 VOL. 27, NO. 4, 565–580 https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2017.1325837 Research article: life history and host range of Prochoerodes onustaria, an unsuitable classical biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree E. Jonesa,b and G. S. Wheelera aUSDA/ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA; bSCA/AmeriCorps, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The life history and host range of the South American defoliator Received 13 January 2017 Prochoerodes onustaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) were examined Accepted 26 April 2017 to determine its suitability as a classical biological control agent of KEYWORDS the invasive weed Brazilian Peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolia,in Schinus terebinthifolia; the U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary List of the Vascular Plants and Wildlife at the Village Of
    A Floristic Evaluation of the Natural Plant Communities and Grounds Occurring at The Key West Botanical Garden, Stock Island, Monroe County, Florida Steven W. Woodmansee [email protected] January 20, 2006 Submitted by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue, Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Submitted to CarolAnn Sharkey Key West Botanical Garden 5210 College Road Key West, Florida 33040 and Kate Marks Heritage Preservation 1012 14th Street, NW, Suite 1200 Washington DC 20005 Introduction The Key West Botanical Garden (KWBG) is located at 5210 College Road on Stock Island, Monroe County, Florida. It is a 7.5 acre conservation area, owned by the City of Key West. The KWBG requested that The Institute for Regional Conservation (IRC) conduct a floristic evaluation of its natural areas and grounds and to provide recommendations. Study Design On August 9-10, 2005 an inventory of all vascular plants was conducted at the KWBG. All areas of the KWBG were visited, including the newly acquired property to the south. Special attention was paid toward the remnant natural habitats. A preliminary plant list was established. Plant taxonomy generally follows Wunderlin (1998) and Bailey et al. (1976). Results Five distinct habitats were recorded for the KWBG. Two of which are human altered and are artificial being classified as developed upland and modified wetland. In addition, three natural habitats are found at the KWBG. They are coastal berm (here termed buttonwood hammock), rockland hammock, and tidal swamp habitats. Developed and Modified Habitats Garden and Developed Upland Areas The developed upland portions include the maintained garden areas as well as the cleared parking areas, building edges, and paths.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Floristic Inventory Of
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Floristic Inventory of Big Torch Hammocks Parcels Epstein and MCLA, Florida Keys Wildlife and Environmental Area, Florida Final Report Steven W. Woodmansee [email protected] June 13, 2005 Submitted by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue, Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Submitted to Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission P.O. Box 430541 Big Pine Key, Florida 33043-0541 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Study Design 3 Results 3 Citations 4 Tables: Table 1: The Vascular Plants of Big Torch Hammocks Parcels Epstein and MCLA, Florida Keys Wildlife and Environmental Area: by Group/Family 5 Table 2: The Vascular Plants of Big Torch Hammocks Parcels Epstein and MCLA, Florida Keys Wildlife and Environmental Area: by Genus 9 Table 3: The Rare Plants of Big Torch Hammocks Parcels Epstein and MCLA, Florida Keys Wildlife and Environmental Area 14 Table 4: The Invasive Exotic Plants of Big Torch Hammocks Parcels Epstein and MCLA, Florida Keys Wildlife and Environmental Area 17 Cover Photo: Metopium toxiferum a common hammock species on Big Torch Key, Steven W. Woodmansee. 1 Introduction: The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (“Commission”) has acquired the Epstein and MCLA parcels on Big Torch Key in Monroe County, Florida. This site is to be incorporated as part of Big Torch Hammocks, Florida Keys Wildlife and Environmental Area. The Commission possessed very little floristic data on these parcels, such as floristic inventories, lists of rare plant species, lists of exotic species, or status of rare plant species on each site.
    [Show full text]
  • Woody and Herbaceous Plants Native to Haiti for Use in Miami-Dade Landscapes1
    Woody and Herbaceous Plants Native to Haiti For use in Miami-Dade Landscapes1 Haiti occupies the western one third of the island of Hispaniola with the Dominican Republic the remainder. Of all the islands within the Caribbean basin Hispaniola possesses the most varied flora after that of Cuba. The plants contained in this review have been recorded as native to Haiti, though some may now have been extirpated due in large part to severe deforestation. Less than 1.5% of the country’s original tree-cover remains. Haiti’s future is critically tied to re- forestation; loss of tree cover has been so profound that exotic fast growing trees, rather than native species, are being used to halt soil erosion and lessen the risk of mudslides. For more information concerning Haiti’s ecological plight consult references at the end of this document. For present purposes all of the trees listed below are native to Haiti, which is why non-natives such as mango (the most widely planted tree) and other important trees such as citrus, kassod tree (Senna siamea) and lead tree (Leucanea leucocephala) are not included. The latter two trees are among the fast growing species used for re-forestation. The Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History’s Flora of the West Indies was an invaluable tool in assessing the range of plants native to Haiti. Not surprisingly many of the listed trees and shrubs 1 John McLaughlin Ph.D. U.F./Miami-Dade County Extension Office, Homestead, FL 33030 Page | 1 are found in other parts of the Caribbean with some also native to South Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Schinus Terebinthifolius
    Schinus terebinthifolius INTRODUCTORY DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS FIRE EFFECTS AND MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS APPENDIX: FIRE REGIME TABLE REFERENCES INTRODUCTORY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION FEIS ABBREVIATION NRCS PLANT CODE COMMON NAMES TAXONOMY SYNONYMS LIFE FORM Photo by Shirley Denton, Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION: Meyer, Rachelle. 2011. Schinus terebinthifolius. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [ 2011, February 25]. FEIS ABBREVIATION: SCHTER NRCS PLANT CODE [190]: SCTE COMMON NAMES: Brazilian pepper Brazilian peppertree Christmas berry Florida holly aroeira TAXONOMY: The scientific name for Brazilian pepper is Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae) [12,94,95,190]. The following varieties are recognized: Schinus terebinthifoliusvar. terebinthifolius Raddi [12,95] Schinus terebinthifolius var. raddianus Engl. [12,94,95] Schinus terebinthifolius var. acutifolius Engl Schinus terebinthifolius var. pohlianus Engl. [12] Schinus terebinthifolius var. rhoifoliusEngl. [12,94] SYNONYMS: None LIFE FORM: Shrub-tree DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE SPECIES: Schinus terebinthifolius GENERAL DISTRIBUTION HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES Photo by Vic Ramey, University of Florida, IFAS-Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants GENERAL DISTRIBUTION: A native to Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay [24,56,70], Brazilian pepper has established in many areas outside its native range, such as Australia [13,199], South Africa [83,137,199], Mediterranean Europe, southern Asia, and the United States [137,199], including Puerto Rico [56,188]. Although Brazilian pepper was introduced to the United States as an ornamental from the mid- to late 1800s [7,56,119,137,211], it did not establish outside of cultivation in Florida until the 1950s [3,56].
    [Show full text]
  • Everglades National Park
    The Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve Vegetation Mapping Project Interim Report: Shark River Slough/Long Pine Key (Region 1), Everglades National Park Vegetation Mapping: SRS/LPK (Region 1), ENP September 2020 ON THE COVER Scrub Cypress (Taxodium sp.) in a graminoid prairie comprised of Sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), Muhly Grass (Muhlenbergia capillaris), Panicgrass (Panicum sp.), and Little Bluestem (Schizachyrium rhizomatum) located south-east of Long Pine Key, Everglades National Park. Photo credit: Theodore N. Schall (23 March 2006). Vegetation Mapping: SRS/LPK (Region 1), ENP September 2020 The Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve Vegetation Mapping Project Interim Report—Shark River Slough/Long Pine Key (Region 1), Everglades National Park Theodore N. Schall1, Pablo L. Ruiz2, Ken Rutchey3, Cynthia Irving1, David McFee3, Kristen Caldecutt1, Becky Maholland1, Viktoria Bogina1, Clay McCoy1, Robert B. Shamblin2, and Kevin R. T. Whelan2 1United1United StatesStates AArmyrmy CCorpsorps o off E Engineers,ngineers JacksonvilleJacksonville District,District 701 San Marco Boulevard,701 San M aJacksonville,rco Boulevard Florida 33207 Jacksonville, Florida 33207 2National Park Service, South Florida Caribbean Network Inventory 2National Park Service andSou tMonitoringh Florida Car iProgram,bbean Netw 18001ork Inven Oldtor yCutler and M oRoad,nitorin g Program Suite18001 419, Old C Palmettoutler Road ,Bay, Suite Florida419 33157 Palmetto Bay, Florida 33157 3South3Sout Floridah Flo rWaterida W Managementater Man District,agem e3301nt DGunist rClubict Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 Please cite publication as: Theodore N. Schall, Pablo L. Ruiz, Ken Rutchey, Cynthia Irving, David McFee, Kristen Caldecutt, Becky Maholland, Viktoria Bogina, Clay McCoy, Robert B.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page 2017 James P. Cuda, Ph.D. Professor and Fulbright
    IPM Award Nomination 1 James Cuda Cover Page 2017 James P. Cuda, Ph.D. Professor and Fulbright Scholar Charles Steinmetz Hall UF/IFAS Entomology & Nematology Dept. Bldg. 970, Natural Area Drive PO Box 110620 Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 (352) 273-3921 [email protected] IPM Award Nomination 2 James Cuda College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Steinmetz Hall, Bldg. 970 Entomology and Nematology Department 1881 Natural Area Drive P.O Box 110620 Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 352-273-3901 352-392-0190 Fax January 24, 2017 Southeastern Branch of the ESA Awards Committee Dear Committee: Although I have only recently joined the Entomology and Nematology Department at the University of Florida, I have quickly come to learn of Dr. Jim Cuda’s accomplishments and passion for research and education in in biocontrol and integrated pest management. As a consequence, I have decided to nominate him for the ESA SEB Recognition Award in IPM and believe he is deserving of your strongest consideration. Jim has developed an internationally recognized program in biocontrol of invasive weeds and has become a globally recognized authority in identifying and evaluating potential biocontrol agents of invasive weeds. He has made significant contributions to the successful management of important invasive weed species in both aquatic and terrestrial environments. He also has made important discoveries in understanding the attributes of successful introduction of exotic biocontrol agents in a manner that successfully mitigates the invasion without disruption of native species. Information from this work has been critical to the management of important invasive plant species such as the tropical soda apple.
    [Show full text]
  • View of Endemism in the Flora Has Decreased the Number of Endemics to 89 Species Within 54 Genera and 29 Families (Freid Et Al
    ABSTRACT A FLORISTIC STUDY OF A FORMER LAND BRIDGE IN THE BAHAMA ARCHIPELAGO by Mark Leo Daniels A floristic study of plant communities was conducted on the islands of Eleuthera, Little San Salvador, and Cat Island. The objectives of this analysis were to explore the species composition and distribution of dry forest communities among the three study sites, and to propose new classification types to facilitate plant conservation in The Bahamas, as outlined by the International Classification of Ecological Communities for Caribbean vegetation types. Unconstrained ordination, cluster analysis and indicator species analysis indicated two dominant forest types across the three study sites: the Coccothrinax argentata-Reynosia septentironalis and Coccoloba diversifolia-Bursera simaruba Alliances. Nested within these forest types were 8 species associations: Coccothrinax argentata– Reynosia septentrionalis – Pithecellobium keyense association; Zanthoxylum flavum – Jacquinia keyensis – Casasia clusiifolia association; Acacia choriophylla - Pithcellobium keyense - Guapira discolor association; Coccoloba diversifolia- Sideroxylon americanum-Pseudophoenix sargentii association; Maytenus buxifolia- Sideroxylon salicifolium association; Exothea paniculata-Tabebuia bahamensis- Metopium toxiferum association; Guaiacum sanctum association; Eugenia foetida- Exostema caribeaum-Bourreria succulenta association. A FLORISTIC STUDY OF A FORMER LAND BRIDGE IN THE BAHAMA ARCHIPELAGO A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by Mark Leo Daniels Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2016 Advisor: Dr. Michael A. Vincent Reader: Dr. James Hickey Reader: Dr. Richard C. Moore ©2016 Mark Leo Daniels This Thesis titled A FLORISTIC STUDY OF A FORMER LAND BRIDGE IN THE BAHAMA ARCHIPELAGO by Mark Leo Daniels has been approved for publication by The College of Arts and Science and Department of Biology ____________________________________________________ Michael A.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazilian Peppertree
    Invasive Plants of the Eastern United States Home | About | Cooperators | Statistics | Help | Join Now | Login | Search | Browse | Partners | Library | Contribute Brazilian Peppertree S. D. Hight - United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Center for Biological Control, Tallahassee, Florida, USA, J.P. Cuda - Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA, J. C. Medal - Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. In: Van Driesche, R., et al., 2002, Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States, USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04, 413 p. Pest Status of Weed Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi, commonly called Brazilian peppertree in North America, is an introduced perennial plant that has become well established and invasive throughout central and southern Florida (Ferriter, 1997; Medal et al., 1999). This species is native to Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay (Barkley, 1944, 1957) and was brought to Florida as an ornamental in the 1840s (Ferriter, 1997; Mack, 1991). The plant is a dioecious, evergreen shrub-to-tree that has compound, shiny leaves. Flowers Figure 1. Fruit clusters on plant of Schinus of terebinthifolius. (Photograph by S. Hight.) both male and female trees are white and the female plant is a prolific producer of bright red fruits (Fig. 1). Although the plant is still grown as an ornamental in California, Texas, and Arizona, S. terebinthifolius is classified as a state noxious weed in Florida and Hawaii (Ferriter, 1997; Habeck et al., 1994; Morton, 1978). Nature of Damage Economic damage. As a member of the Anacardiaceae, S. terebinthifolius has allergen-causing properties, as do other members of the family.
    [Show full text]
  • An Old-Growth Definition for Tropical and Subtropical Forests in Florida
    United States Department of An Old-Growth Definition for Agriculture Forest Service Tropical and Subtropical Forests in Florida Southern Kenneth W. Outcalt Research Station General Technical Report SRS-13 A Section of the Old-Growth Definition Series ___________ The Author: ___________ Kenneth W. Outcalt, Research Plant Ecologist, Southern Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Athens, GA 30602-2044. Preface Old growth is widely acknowledged today as an essential part of managed forests, particularly on public lands. However, this concept is relatively new, evolving since the 1970's when a grassroots movement in the Pacific Northwest began in earnest to define old growth. In response to changes in public attitude, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, began reevaluating its policy regarding old-growth forests in the 1980's. Indeed, the ecological significance of old growth and its contribution to biodiversity were apparent. It was also evident that definitions were needed to adequately assess and manage the old-growth resource. However, definitions of old growth varied widely among scientists. To address this discrepancy and other old-growth issues, the National Old-Growth Task Group was formed in 1988. At the recommendation of this committee, old growth was officially recognized as a distinct resource by the Forest Service, greatly enhancing its status in forest management planning. The committee devised “The Generic Definition and Description of Old-Growth Forests” to serve as a basis for further work and to ensure uniformity among Forest Service Stations and Regions. Emphasis was placed on the quantification of old-growth attributes. At the urging of the Chief of the Forest Service, all Forest Service Stations and Regions began developing old-growth definitions for specific forest types.
    [Show full text]