DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Capital Asset Management and Investment Program 2015—2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Capital Asset Management and Investment Program 2015—2019 PROPOSED CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT AND INVESTMENT PROGRAM 2015—2019 Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon This page left intentionally blank. PROPOSED CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT & INVESTMENT PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction A. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 B. Capital Budgeting Policies and Approaches ....................................................................................................................................... 10 C. Reader’s Guide ................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 D. Summary of Capital Asset Management & Investment Program by Asset Category ........................................................................ 13 2. State of Good Repair A. Overview............................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 B. FTA State of Good Repair Program .................................................................................................................................................... 17 C. Current State of Good Repair ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 D. Transit Asset Management Plan......................................................................................................................................................... 19 E. State of Good Repair Projects ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 3. Vehicles A. Fixed Route Buses .............................................................................................................................................................................. 23 i. Drop Down Chains ................................................................................................................................................................. 28 ii. Hybrid Buses for Expansion ................................................................................................................................................... 29 iii. Additional CAD/AVL Equipment (40) ..................................................................................................................................... 30 iv. Merlo CNG Fleet Conversion ................................................................................................................................................ 31 B. Light Rail Vehicles ............................................................................................................................................................................... 32 i. Rail Maintenance Equipment ................................................................................................................................................ 44 C. ATP/LIFT Vehicles ............................................................................................................................................................................... 45 D. Non‐Revenue Vehicles ....................................................................................................................................................................... 49 E. Other Vehicle Projects i. Positive Train Control ............................................................................................................................................................ 52 ii. Transit Ad Bus Frames ........................................................................................................................................................... 53 iii. TVM Maintenance – Additional NRVs ................................................................................................................................... 54 iv. WES DMU Fleet Increase (2 additional) ................................................................................................................................ 55 v. On Board Energy Storage ...................................................................................................................................................... 56 F. Vehicle Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................ 57 4. Maintenance of Way A. Track and Structures ........................................................................................................................................................................... 61 B. Overhead Catenary System ................................................................................................................................................................ 66 Page ‐ 3 PROPOSED CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT & INVESTMENT PROGRAM C. Signals ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 69 D. Substations ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 E. FEM Communications ........................................................................................................................................................................ 77 F. Maintenance of Way Projects i. Conversion of MAX Track Switches to Powered Operation for Service Quality ................................................................... 79 ii. Ruby Junction MOW Training Module .................................................................................................................................. 80 G. Maintenance of Way Summary .......................................................................................................................................................... 81 5. Facilities – Customer and Operations A. Customer Facilities i. Bus Stop Development Program ........................................................................................................................................... 85 ii. Customer Information Services ............................................................................................................................................. 91 iii. Portland Mall Shelters ........................................................................................................................................................... 92 iv. Bike Parking Modernization .................................................................................................................................................. 93 v. East Portland Active Transportation to Transit Project: Bike Parking ................................................................................... 94 vi. Westside Bike & Rides: Bike Parking ..................................................................................................................................... 95 vii. Bike to Transit ........................................................................................................................................................................ 96 viii. Blue Line Station Rehabilitation (formerly “Renew the Blue”) ............................................................................................. 97 ix. Bus On‐Street Maintenance .................................................................................................................................................. 99 x. E‐Paper Pilot ........................................................................................................................................................................ 100 xi. Lloyd District Transit Tracker Enhancements ...................................................................................................................... 102 xii. Park & Ride Signage Share .................................................................................................................................................. 103 xiii. Respond to ADA Audit ......................................................................................................................................................... 104 B. Operating Facilities i. Facilities Management ........................................................................................................................................................ 105 a. Facilities Management Summary ........................................................................................................................... 109 b. Facilities Management Projects ............................................................................................................................. 110 ii. Environmental a. Storm Water UIC Program ..................................................................................................................................... 155 b. All Facilities Maintenance Environmental .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final2018 RTP Projectsweb20190315
    Published 3/15/19 2018 Regional Transportation Plan Strategic List of Additional Priority Projects and Programs RTP Investment County Nominating Agency Primary Facility Owner RTP ID Project Name Start Location End Location Description Estimated Cost (2016 Time Period Financially Category dollars) Constrained project list Active Transportation Clackamas County Oregon City Oregon City 10147 Newell Creek Canyon/Holly Hwy 213 and Redland Maple Lane Road Add a shared-use path along the west side of $ 5,000,000 2028-2040 No Lane Shared-Use Path Road the gully between the Redland/Livesay and Holly/Donovan intersection and then along Holly Lane between Donovan and Maple Lane. Will require a bridge over the gully south of Redland Road (TSP Project S12, S13). The project or a portion of the project is outside the designated urban growth boundary. Active Transportation Clackamas County Oregon City Oregon City 10150 Barlow Road Shared-Use Trail Abernethy Road UGB Add a shared-use path on the west/south side $ 4,600,000 2028-2040 No of Redland Road, along the north side of the gully from the Redland/Livesay to Holcomb/Oak Tree intersection, and from Holcomb to Ames Street. Install enhanced crossings at Redland Road and Holcomb Blvd (TSP S6, S9, S10, S11, C5, C7). Active Transportation Clackamas County Lake Oswego Lake Oswego 11171 Tryon Creek Ped Bridge Foothills Park Tryon Cove Park 500' long, 10' wide asphalt pathway completes a $ 3,000,000 2028-2040 No (@Tryon Cove Park) connection at the existing north end Foothills pathway with to Tryon Cove Park with a pedestrian bridge (per Foothills District Plan).
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Session Line 1 Title of Session Line 2
    Planning and Execution of a Major Light Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection Matt Baccitich Project Coordinator TriMet – MOW Operations Portland, OR Matt Harlan, PE Project Manager David Evans and Associates, Inc. Portland, OR Planning and Execution of a Major Light Rail Transit Tunnel Inspection • Robertson Tunnel Overview and Construction • Inspection Planning and Scoping • Owner Planning and Coordination • Inspection Results and Deliverables TriMet System Overview Robertson Tunnel Fast Facts Construction Details -TBM - Cut and Cover -Blasting Washington Park Station Inspection Planning and Scoping • Work backwards from project need • Establish deliverable expectations Inspection Planning and Scoping Inspection Planning and Scoping • Work backwards from project need • Establish deliverable expectations • Scale inspection effort Inspection Planning and Scoping 10001 - Cast-in-Place Tunnel Liner (SF) Drip Begin End Efflorescence/Rust Pans Delam/Spall/Patch Exposed Rebar Cracking (Liners) Distortion Leakage Station Station Staining (Qty) CS2 CS3 CS4 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS1 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS2 CS3 CS4 CS2 CS3 CS4 782+00 782+50 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 782+50 783+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 783+00 783+50 0 0 0 0 0 0 440 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 210 0 783+50 784+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 550 0 0 270 50 0 0 0 0 0 20 250 0 784+00 784+50 1 0 0 0 0 0 370 20 0 260 60 50 0 0 0 0 110 250 0 784+50 785+00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 0 0 200 100 50 0 0 0 0 70 340 0 785+00 785+50 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 305 5 0 200 50 100 0 0 0 0 210 250 0 785+50 786+00 0
    [Show full text]
  • Trimet Film/Photo Guidelines
    TriMet Film/Photo Guidelines Overview TriMet’s core business mission is to provide mass transit services safely throughout the Portland metro area. TriMet vehicles and property are for the exclusive use of TriMet, its employees and customers. TriMet allows filming/photography on TriMet property that is open to the public, as well as bus, commuter rail and light rail systems in accordance with this protocol. Any permission granted to film/photograph under this protocol is subordinate to, and will be based on, TriMet’s determination of the impact to TriMet’s core mission, safety, and its obligations to its customers, employees and to the general public. Safety and security are TriMet’s top priorities when approving these requests. All persons filming/photographing on TriMet property are subject to, and must comply with, TriMet Code of Conduct regulations, and all other applicable laws, rules and regulations. Persons filming/photographing on TriMet property must fully and immediately comply with requests/direction from authorized TriMet personnel related to safety concerns. Permit Required: TriMet requires those who wish to film/photograph on TriMet property or on board vehicles for commercial, educational or nonprofit purposes to have a permit. TriMet’s Communications Department processes permit applications and issues permits. TriMet has no requirement to approve a request or enter into a permit with a requestor. TriMet must receive a signed permit and acceptable insurance certificates prior to an approved shoot. Permit Not Required: Non-commercial, personal use filming/photography by the general public that does not interfere with transit operations and safety, including boarding/exiting of passengers, and that can be accomplished by one person using a hand-held camera without ancillary equipment such as a tripod, microphone, reflectors, special lighting, cables or other wiring, is not subject to the permit requirements of this protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY
    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • America's Natural Nuclear Bunkers
    America’s Natural Nuclear Bunkers 1 America’s Natural Nuclear Bunkers Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................... 10 Alabama .............................................................................................................. 12 Alabama Caves .................................................................................................. 13 Alabama Mines ................................................................................................. 16 Alabama Tunnels .............................................................................................. 16 Alaska ................................................................................................................. 18 Alaska Caves ..................................................................................................... 19 Alaska Mines ............................................................................................... 19 Arizona ............................................................................................................... 24 Arizona Caves ................................................................................................... 25 Arizona Mines ................................................................................................... 26 Arkansas ............................................................................................................ 28 Arkansas Caves ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Adop Ted Text
    Active Transportation Elements Active transportation refers to human-powered travel, including walking and bicycling. Public transit is also a component of active transportation because accessing transit stops usually involves walking or bicycling. Wide- spread use of the term began as transportation policy placed increased emphasis on non-automobile modes and as the links between human health and transportation planning became more evident. Active transportation modes are essential components of the overall transportation system, meeting a variety of societal, environmental, and economic goals. These include: • Environmental stewardship and energy sustainability: Replacing gasoline-powered automobile trips with active trips reduces the emission of greenhouse gases, air toxins and particulates, helping to maintain air quality and address energy sustainability. • Congestion alleviation: People who walk, bike and use transit reduce the number of motor vehicles vying for space on roadways and in parking lots. The active mode share for commuting from Wash- ington County is currently estimated to be about 11% for work-related trips.6 Reduced congestion improves air quality, livability and economic vitality. • Health: “Obesity is one of the biggest public health challenges the country has ever faced.7” The con- ditions in which we live explain in part why some Americans are healthier than others and why Ameri- cans are generally not as healthy as they could be. The social determinants of health include five key areas: Economic Stability, Education, Social and Community Context, Health Care, and the Neighbor- TEXT ADOPTED hood and Built Environment. The TSP sets the framework for future decisions about the Neighborhood and Built Environment component. Due to the connection to public health and healthy outcomes, it is necessary that public health and active lifestyles are considered as we make these choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Trimettab 2011 24PG VERSION.Indd
    D8O 9CL<C@E< KLIEJ),KLIEJ), 9CL<C@E< (0/-$)'(( 8L>%*(J<GK%(#)'(( B6M7ajZA^cZid<gZh]Vb WnVgi^hiBZadYnDlZc GFIKC8E;KI@9LE<:FDDLE@KPE<NJG8G<IJ 386361.083111 MBL 2 MAX BLUE LINE 25TH ANNIVERSARY > TriMet.org | AUGUST 31 & SEPTEMBER 1, 2011 Portland Tribune/Community Newspapers Expo Center Airport Portland N Hillsboro MAX Blue Line turns 25 Beaverton Gresham Milwaukie Clackamas What a transformation! Wilsonville Who would have thought that back in the 1970s, when the region said “no” to building an eight-lane freeway through Southeast Portland and instead said “yes” to build- ing light rail, that we would become the national leader on creating great communities with transit? In the 25 years since we opened the fi rst MAX line be- tween Portland and Gresham, we have seen neighborhoods created and enhanced along all of our light-rail lines. These are vibrant places to live, work and play. Since that original 15-mile line to Gresham, the MAX system has grown to 52 miles, serving all three counties in our region. Our fi ve MAX lines have been so successful that ridership continues to grow — now averaging more than 130,000 rides each weekday. And we continue to expand the system with our sixth line under construction — the Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail Project. We hear from our community that they want more — not just MAX, but also more bus service. Just last year our buses and trains carried more than 100 million rides! We also hear from cities around the country asking how they can replicate our success with light rail.
    [Show full text]
  • To Gresham Route: MAX Blue Line
    TriMet Passenger Census -Fall 2018 1 All Day Ons and Offs by Route and Stop Sunday Route: MAX Blue Line - To Gresham Monthly Stop Location Location ID Direction Position Ons Offs Total Lifts Hatfield Government Center MAX Station 9848 S AT 544 0 544 | 0 Hillsboro Central/SE 3rd TC MAX Station 9846 E AT 436 25 461 | 0 Tuality Hospital/SE 8th Ave MAX Station 9843 E AT 153 26 179 | 0 Washington/SE 12th Ave MAX Station 9841 E AT 227 64 291 | 0 Fair Complex/Hillsboro Airport MAX Stn 9838 E AT 330 76 406 | 0 Hawthorn Farm MAX Station 9839 E AT 104 47 151 | 0 Orenco MAX Station 9835 E AT 421 186 607 | 0 Quatama MAX Station 9834 E AT 484 150 634 | 0 Willow Creek/SW 185th Ave TC MAX Station 9831 E AT 549 225 774 | 0 Elmonica/SW 170th Ave MAX Station 9830 E AT 447 142 589 | 0 Merlo Rd/SW 158th Ave MAX Station 9828 E AT 178 69 247 | 0 Beaverton Creek MAX Station 9822 S AT 152 34 186 | 0 Millikan Way MAX Station 9826 E AT 434 151 585 | 0 Beaverton Central MAX Station 9824 E AT 242 240 482 | 0 Beaverton TC MAX Station 9821 N AT 729 650 1,379 | 0 Sunset TC MAX Station 9969 E AT 501 160 661 | 0 Washington Park MAX Station 10120 E AT 306 247 553 | 0 Goose Hollow/SW Jefferson St MAX Station 10118 E AT 122 228 350 | 0 Kings Hill/SW Salmon St MAX Station 9759 N AT 83 109 192 | 0 Providence Park MAX Station 9758 E AT 484 504 988 | 0 Library/SW 9th Ave MAX Station 8333 E AT 364 624 988 | 0 Pioneer Square South MAX Station 8334 E AT 435 1,004 1,439 | 0 Mall/SW 4th Ave MAX Station 8335 E AT 259 352 611 | 0 Yamhill District MAX Station 8336 E AT 243 167 410
    [Show full text]
  • SW Portland Post
    School band Buy your produce SW Corridor Plan programs get at the Hillsdale advisory committee $925,000 boost Farmers Market, plans for rapid for new then check out the transit and light rail instruments tunnels Rieke Art Fair – Page 4 – Page 3 – Page 5 The Southwest Portland Post Volume No. 23 Issue No. 7 www.swportlandpost.com Portland, Oregon Complimentary May 2015 ‘Road warriors’ develop plan of attack for Capitol Highway improvements By Erik Vidstrand The Southwest Portland Post On a cold, damp Saturday morning in April, more than a dozen citizens, many who live along Southwest Capitol Highway, between Garden Home Road and Taylors Ferry Road, assembled to address solutions for pedestrian and bicycle improvements along this stretch of highway. Under the leadership of Chris Lyons, a group of neighbors formed an ad hoc committee of the Multnomah Neighborhood Association. These present-day road warriors are sick and tired of the deficiencies on this road but say they believe this time they may be successful. This was the second meeting held by the ad hoc committee. From this reporter’s view, the group of crusaders seemed like new troops replacing the tired ones. Capitol Highway "road warriors" convene April 25 at the Dolph Court intersection where all major issues prevail. It’s been literally decades that various (Post photo by Erik Vidstrand) residents have been petitioning, meeting, and holding vigils about the Transportation has said that this stretch installing a 72-inch pipe under the “Cut it back?” Patti Waitman- poor quality and safety of this major will cost $19 million to make necessary road to manage stormwater.” Ingebretsen spoke up.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program December, 2014 About Metro Clean Air and Clean Water Do Not Stop at City Limits Or County Lines
    2015 – 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program December, 2014 About Metro Clean air and clean water do not stop at city limits or county lines. Neither does the need for jobs, a thriving economy, and sustainable transportation and living choices for people and businesses in the region. Voters have asked Metro to help with the challenges and opportunities that affect the 25 cities and three counties in the Portland metropolitan area. A regional approach simply makes sense when it comes to providing services, operating venues and making decisions about how the region grows. Metro works with communities to support a resilient economy, keep nature close by and respond to a changing climate. Together we’re making a great place, now and for generations to come. Stay in touch with news, stories and things to do. www.oregonmetro.gov/connect Metro Council President Tom Hughes Metro Councilors Shirley Craddick, District 1 Carlotta Collette, District 2 Craig Dirksen, District 3 Kathryn Harrington, District 4 Sam Chase, District 5 Bob Stacey, District 6 Auditor Suzanne Flynn Nondiscrimination Notice to the Public Metro hereby gives public notice that it is the policy of the Metro Council to assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Title VI requires that no person in the United States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which Metro receives federal financial assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Stations
    LIGHT RAIL STATIONS With the opening of the MAX Orange Line in 2015, the region now enjoys a 60-mile light rail system with 97 stations. Aesthetics TriMet has made station appearance a priority, reflecting TriMet’s goal to create a positive total transit experience for passengers. The station architecture is purposefully designed to relate to the local community, helping support its local character: • The Eastside MAX Blue Line stations generally follow a traditional style reminiscent of earlier trolley and interurban stations, constructed in modern materials. The shelters have pitched roofs, with scalloped eaves and perforated ridgelines. The roof and structure is a subdued turquoise color. Shelters at downtown stations are angular Downtown MAX Blue Line stations follow a more contemporary and contemporary. • line, with shed roofs and angular supports. The roof and Light rail station basics structure is painted a combination of black and TriMet’s agency • The short blocks in Downtown standard dark blue. Portland restrict station length to • The Hillsboro stations on the Blue Line revert to a more 200 feet, which can accommodate a traditional style, again reminiscent of earlier interurban trolley two-car train. stations. The basic roofs and structures are painted a sea-foam • All platforms allow for virtually level green, except for the Main St. station’s copper roofs. boarding to low floor cars—which • The MAX Red Line also incorporates a contemporary design by have a bridgeplate for wheelchairs and utilizing a “gull-wing” shape to reflect an airport sensibility. Its strollers to cross the small vertical and color scheme is a silver painted roof and dark blue structure that horizontal gap at the car threshold.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Station Access Data
    APPENDIX D STATION ACCESS DATA Station Access Data This appendix includes a summary of existing data related to transit access collected as part of the research project, including access mode share characteristics for example stations throughout the United States. Access data include total daily boardings and access mode share for each of the primary access modes: park‐and‐ride, drop‐off, feeder transit, bicycle, and pedestrian. The other primary attributes include: • Number of auto parking spaces; • Number of connecting transit lines; • Population within ½‐mile; • Jobs within ½‐mile; and • Walk Score. The station access data are organized by station type, which was assigned to each station by the research team. The data were collected using a variety of sources. Daily ridership and access mode split were obtained directly from the transit agencies operating the service, and were collected between 2006 and 2010. Parking spaces and connecting transit lines were collected by reviewing data available from transit agency websites and third‐party sources. Population and jobs information comes from the U.S. Census as reported by the Center for Neighborhood Technology’s TOD database, which collates station‐area demographic data for all high‐capacity transit stations in the U.S. Finally, Walk Score values were collected for each station from the website http://www.walkscore.com. High-Density Urban Neighborhood Station Access Mode Share Auto Connecting Population Jobs within Walk Agency Station Name Daily Boardings Park-and-Ride Drop-off Feeder Bicycle Walk Parking Transit Lines within 1/2-mile 1/2-mile Score BART 16th St. Misson 11,404 2% 4% 16% 6% 72% 0 7 24,912 48,189 95 24th St.
    [Show full text]