Special Convocation Conseil Extraordinaire
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2014-2015 Annual Report
ANNUAL REPORT TO MEMBERS 2014-2015 AND ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING Friday, May 8, 2015 Greater Sudbury, Ontario FONOM ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING A G E N D A Friday, May 8, 2015, 8:00 am Main Ballroom, Holiday Inn Hotel 1696 Regent Street Greater Sudbury, ON 1. Approval of / Additions to Agenda 2. Introduction of Executive 3. President’s Report 4. Financial Report (resolution required) 5. Approval of Minutes of Meeting Friday, May 9, 2014 (resolution required) 6. Resolutions 7. Adjourn 2 FONOM BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESIDENT TELEPHONE (705) REPRESENTING Mayor Alan Spacek Mun Tel 337-4250 District of Town of Kapuskasing Mun Fax 335-5103 Cochrane 88 Riverside Drive Kapuskasing, ON P5N 1B3 Email: [email protected] PAST PRESIDENT Councillor S. Mac Bain Mun Tel 474-0400 City of North Bay City of North Bay Mun Fax 495-4353 PO Box 360 200 McIntyre St. E. North Bay, ON P1B 8H8 Email: [email protected] FIRST VICE PRESIDENT Councillor Danny Whalen Mun Tel 672-3363 District of City of Temiskaming Shores Mun Fax 672-3200 Timiskaming 325 Farr Drive, Box 2050 Haileybury, ON P0J 1C0 Email : [email protected] SECOND VICE PRESIDENT Mayor Brian Bigger Mun Tel 674-4455 City of Greater City of Greater Sudbury Ext. 2514 Sudbury PO Box 5000, Stn A Mun Fax 673-3096 200 Brady Street Sudbury, ON P3A 5P3 Email: [email protected] DIRECTORS (in alphabetical order by surname) Mayor Steven Black Mun Tel 360-2611 City of Timmins City of Timmins Mun Fax 360-2690 220 Algonquin Blvd. East Timmins, ON P1B 8H8 Email: [email protected] Reeve Austin -
The Charter 25 Years Later: the Good, the Bad, and the Challenges ©
Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 4 Volume 45, Number 2 (Summer 2007) The hC arter 25 Years Later: The Good, the Bad, and the Challenges Beverley McLachlin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Article Citation Information McLachlin, Beverley. "The hC arter 25 Years Later: The Good, the Bad, and the Challenges." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45.2 (2007) : 365-377. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol45/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. THE CHARTER 25 YEARS LATER: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE CHALLENGES © REMARKS OF THE RIGHT HONOURABLE BEVERLEY MCLACHLIN I. INTRODUCTION This year, as we celebrate the 25th anniversary of the adoption of the Charter, journals and newspapers are replete with evaluations. Some are positive, some less so. Some are downright critical. Today, I would like to offer my reflections on the good news and the bad news about the Charter,a quarter-century on. I will begin with a declaration of interest. Over the years I have said and written a lot about Canada's constitutional bill of rights. My first foray, written when I was still a callow law student, was an article arguing that Canada should not constitutionalize rights, based on a comparison of rights protection in the United States under an entrenched bill of rights and rights protection in Canada without one. -
Special Convocation Conseil Extraordinaire
June/ Ju in 2012 LET RIGHT PREVAIL Barreau The Law Society of du Haut-Canada Upper Canada Special Conseil Convocation extraordinaire The conferring of la remise d'un grade an honorary degree cmd honrifique et l 'assennentation the call to the bar des candidats et of the candidates des candidates CONTENTS ROY THOMSON HALL Toronto, Ontario 7 Wednesday, June l3, 2012 9:30 a.m. ROY THOMSON HALL I I Toronto, Ontario Friday, June 15, 2012 9:00 a.m. ROY THOMSON HALL 15 Toronto, Ontario Friday, June 15, 2012 2:30 p.m. NATIONAL ARTS CENTRE 19 Ottawa, Ontario Tuesday, June l 9, 2012 lO:OO a.m. CENTRE NATIONAL DES ARTS Ottawa (Ontario) Le mardi 19 juin 2012 10 h 00 LONDON CONVENTION CENTRE 23 London, Ontario Thursday, June 2 l, 20 l 2 2:30 p.m. MESSAGE FROM THE TREASURER LE MESSAGE DU TRESOR/ER 2 oday is a day to celebrate! Congratulations A ujourd'hui est un jour de celebration! T on joining an extraordinary profession with a J-\.. Felicitations pour votre adhesion a une long tradition of service to the public. You should profession extraordinaire qui s'inscrit dans une be proud of your achievement. and proud of the longue tradition de service au public. Yous devriez profession you ha\'e chosen. etre fiers de votre reussite et de la profession que vous avez chois1e. Two hundred and fifteen years ago. ten of the fifteen la\\yers then practising in Upper Canada Voila deux cent quinze ans. I 0 des 15 avocats met in Niagara-on-the-Lake and founded the exen;ant alors le droit au Haut-Canada se Law Society of Upper Canada. -
The Geography of Civil Legal Services in Ontario
The GEOGRAPHY of Civil Legal Services in ONTARIO Report of the mapping phase of the Ontario Civil Legal Needs Project by Jamie Baxter and Albert Yoon Green: Pantone 361 CVC Blue: Pantone 301 CVC The GEOGRAPHY of Civil Legal Services in ONTARIO Report of by Jamie Baxter the mapping phase of the University of Toronto Ontario Civil Legal Faculty of Law Needs Project and Albert Yoon University of Toronto Faculty of Law This report is the companion piece to the Listening to Ontarians report (May 2010) and completes the Ontario Civil Legal Needs Project. Acknowledgements The Geography of Civil Legal Services in Ontario is the report for the Mapping Project phase of the Ontario Civil Legal Needs Project. It is presented by the Project Steering Committee, consisting of: • R. Roy McMurtry – Chair • Marion Boyd – Bencher, The Law Society of Upper Canada • John McCamus – Chair, Legal Aid Ontario • Lorne Sossin – Past Vice Chair, Pro Bono Law Ontario The Steering Committee extends its special thanks to Professor Albert Yoon of the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto, and Jamie Baxter, Visiting Researcher at the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto, for their outstanding contributions in analyzing the data and preparing this report. Completion of this Mapping Project would not have been possible without their expertise and hard work. The Steering Committee thanks the governing boards of the Project partner organizations — The Law Society of Upper Canada, Legal Aid Ontario and Pro Bono Law Ontario — for supporting this project, financially -
Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early And
■ Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 1: 1797 to 1940 Click here to download Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present For each lawyer, this document offers some or all of the following information: name gender year and place of birth, and year of death where applicable year called to the bar in Ontario (and/or, until 1889, the year admitted to the courts as a solicitor; from 1889, all lawyers admitted to practice were admitted as both barristers and solicitors, and all were called to the bar) whether appointed K.C. or Q.C. name of diverse community or heritage biographical notes name of nominating person or organization if relevant sources used in preparing the biography (note: living lawyers provided or edited and approved their own biographies including the names of their community or heritage) suggestions for further reading, and photo where available. The biographies are ordered chronologically, by year called to the bar, then alphabetically by last name. To reach a particular period, click on the following links: 1797–1900, 1901-1910, 1911-1920, 1921-1930, 1931-1940. For more information on the project, including the set of all biographies arranged by diverse community rather than by year of call, please click here for the Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History home page. Last published May 2012 by The Law Society of Upper Canada. -
A Common Cause and New Direction for Sault Ste. Marie
PEOPLE Our collective PLACE future. PROSPERITY 2017 20YRS. 2037 Community Adjustment Committee Report. Nov. 15, 2017 A Common Cause and New Direction For Sault Ste. Marie. Futuressm.com Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary of Terms........................................................................................................................................ 13 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 14 1.0 Background to the Sault Ste. Marie Community of Adjustment Committee ....................................... 14 1.1 Purpose and Objectives of the Community Adjustment Committee ............................................... 15 1.2 Community Context for Community Adjustment Committee’s Planning ........................................ 15 1.2.1 Learning from Previous Planning Initiatives .............................................................................. 16 1.3 Adopting a Framework for Community Resilience ........................................................................... 17 2.0 Community Adjustment Committee Process/Methodology ................................................................ 17 2.1 Committee Processes ........................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 Subcommittee -
Top 10 Ontario Regional Law Firms See Possibilities in This Taking This Year’S No
TOP ONTARIO REGIONAL FIRMS ntario law firms see opportunities and risks in an era of consolidation and slow economic growth. OPPORTUNITIES Clients who are released by merged firms due to conflicts, or are unwilling to pay the fees demanded by international behemoths, may well look to smaller firms located in and around Canada’s financial and administrative centres. O Managing partners around the province watched with interest as Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP merged with American and U.K. firms in the spring creating Dentons, with nearly 2,600 lawyers. But there is also the fear, as legal budgets shrink or remain static, larger firms could use their marketing might to swallow AND RISK up the space occupied by regional mid-sized players. The t op 10 Ontario regional law firms see possibilities in this Taking this year’s No. 1 spot in Canadian Lawyer’s many of Ontario’s regional firms, with their strong list of the top 10 Ontario regional firms is Aird & emphasis on business law, continue to feel the effects era of consolidation and slow economic growth. Berlis LLP, which sees itself as well placed to capitalize on of the sluggish economy. This spring was “perhaps the the reshaping of the legal market. “Every time there’s a quietest I’ve personally seen in 18 years… from a deals By Charlotte Santry merger there’s an opportunity for us, because every time standpoint,” says Arlene O’Neill, partner at Gardiner there’s an international merger there’s a whole referral Roberts LLP. Businesses are far more cautious and network that has been broken,” says the firm’s managing “we’ve had a lot of deals that haven’t gone through.” partner Eldon Bennett. -
Redbrick Communications 2017 Social Media Survey
2017 Municipal Social Media Survey By now, Ontario municipalities recognize that to get in front of their audiences, they have to be on social media. Municipalities are becoming more creative, sophisticated and engaging on social media. A significant portion of municipal Heads of Council are getting social online, too. Read on for a comprehensive look at how Ontario’s municipalities are using social media. 81% of municipalities are on social media Ontario Municipalities on Social Media 361 Year over year 321 300 2017 271 2016 240 2015 2014 193 2013 127 2012 2011 25 2010 Social Media Use by Channel Which social media channels do municipalities use the most?* 98% 22% 71% 31% 8% From 2016 to 2017, Facebook use grew even more – with almost all social municipalities using it. Twitter use decreased, but still remains prevalent. Instagram began to gain rank as the third most popular channel for municipalities. *Data was gathered by actively searching for Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram accounts for each municipality. Data for YouTube and LinkedIn was recorded when municipalities promoted these channels on their website or through other social media accounts. Social Media Approach With so many social media channels, different municipal service areas, multiple audiences, and limited resources, how are municipalities approaching social media? Centralized Municipalities with just one main account per social media channel 30% Centralized Mixed Municipalities that use a central account 49% and up to three specialized accounts for Mixed different departments and service areas Decentralized Decentralized Municipalities with four or more accounts 21% dedicated to different departments or service areas In 2017, many municipalities switched from a decentralized or centralized approach to a mixed approach. -
The History and the Future of the Politics of Policing
Conference Draft – June 29, 2004 CONFERENCE DRAFT “The History and the Future of the Politics of Policing” Margaret Beare Sociology and Law, Osgoode Hall Law School Abstract: This paper examines the operational realities of the police executive linkages—beyond the official dictates of the law and the desired position expressed in ideological discourses on police independence. Paper draws primarily on historical and criminological literature and research, and public inquiries. The central argument of this paper is that, while there may be a somewhat clear-cut division between the policy versus the operational control of the police by the State in law and in rhetoric, the reality is quite different. The relationship between the State and the police is a dynamic relationship that changes to reflect the nature of the policing that is being carried-out, the political interests of the party in power, and to some extent the personalities of the key players within both the police services and in politics at a specific period in time. This research indicates that looking for the ‘smoking gun’—i.e. the memo or document that in writing acknowledges a directive from the executive to the police sidesteps the reality of the on-going partnerships between politics and policing. Introduction: Much current controversy surrounding policing centres around two issues: the relationship between the police and politics and the question of accountability. Dianne Martins paper has addressed the issue of accountability and while the two issues overlap, I shall be looking specifically at the political question. An understanding of the organizational workings of the police is essential to any attempt to reconcile the tensions between the dictates of police autonomy and the restraints imposed on the police. -
Archived Content Contenu Archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. Library on - A Human Process Acquisitions tion — un processus humain n and Brain Chemistry té et chimie cérébrale Legislation - Some Pros and Cons Législation sur les jeunes délinquants — Certains aspects du pour et du contre A Mr.s,r:T.-:‘ THE C,H1MINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM F cnu -D,F 1 1:1". -
The Cord Weekly
THECORDWEEKLY Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo, Ontario Thursday, October 30 Volume 21 Number 8 NEWS SHORTS corporations, a contract of PLANT TOURS ownership of theseassets was drawn up. The major asset, the typesetting by Meri-Ellen McGoey machine lb worth approximately The plant tours were set up for the $16,000, was one ofthe main reasons 3rd year business students for the for such a contract. It was important purpose ofacquainting the students with the industry environment in to distinguish ownership as there which many management decisions was a feeling on the board that are made. A few ofthe participating should Student Publications ever be industries were Electrohome, sued, the "suer" could take all the National Cash Register, Babcox- assets. Wilcox and Imperial Tabacco. At the WLUSU Board meeting of Approximately thirty to forty October 5, WLUSU purchased the industries were contacted and ten assets of the Student Publications were visited by the students. In an for one dollar. Randy Elliot, vice interview with Dr. Howard Prout president, explained to the Board he said that the cooperation from that "this ensured WLUSU that the industries was very good. Many with Student Publications owning industries were eager to conduct noassets, they could not be sued." It plant tours but were unable to do so was then necessary to reach a rental for reasons of internal agreement between the two This is what the new pub looks so left, plant like far. The bar is on the and the raised seating section is construction, safety regulations corporations. WLUSU agreed to to theright.The doorbehind bar leads and the to thestairwell, theliquorstorage space,and to where location. -
Great Lakes Compact- How Did We Get Here? Great Lakes Compact- How Did We Get Here?
Great Lakes Compact- How Did We Get Here? Legal context • Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 -Attempt to prevent or resolve United StateslCanada water disputes over boundary levels and flows -Created International Joint Commission • Great Lakes Charter of 1985 -Voluntary, primarily non-substantive collective management agreement among Great Lakes states and Canadian provinces • Water Resources Devetopment Act of 1986 -Federal statute subjecting approval by Great Lakes standard • Great Lakes Charter Annex of 2001 -"Agreement to agree" contair binding agreement with decision-making standard Great Lakes Compact- How Did We Get Here? Great Lakes Compact- How Did We Get Here? Late 1970s - proposal to construct coal slurry pipeline from Wyoming's Powder River Basin to Duluth using Lake Superlor water to suspend |he coal Early 1980s - U.S, Army studies the feasibility of using Great Lakes Water to replenish the O, Great Lakes Compact- How Did We Get Here? 1998 - "Nova Group" proposal to ship Lake Superior water to private customers in Asia approved by Ontario Great Lakes Agreement Great Lakes Compact Great Lakes-St, Lawrence River Basin Great Lakes-St, Lawrence River Basin Water Sustainable Water Resources Agreement Resources Compact • Good-faith, nonbinding policy agreement between . Binding and legally enforceable agreement the American member states (lllinols, Indiana, administered primarily under the regulatory Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, authority of individual Great Lakes states, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) and Canadian member consented to by Congress provinces (Ontario, Quebec) • Embodies same principles as Agreement with * Governed by Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Canadian provinces Basin Water Resources Regional Body • Became effective after final consent from U.S.