DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Justice Discipline Report Duportail Bridge Project, City of Richland, WA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Justice Discipline Report Duportail Bridge Project, City of Richland, WA Environmental Justice Discipline Report Duportail Bridge Project, City of Richland, WA Prepared by: Federal Highway Administration 711 South Capitol Way, Suite 501 Olympia, WA 98501 Washington State Department of Transportation P.O. Box 12560 Yakima, WA 98909 October,January 24, 2011 2011 This page left blank intentionally for printing purposes. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 What alternatives were analyzed? ............................................................................................... 1 What is the No Build alternative? ............................................................................................... 1 What are the principal features of the build alternative? ............................................................ 1 What is the purpose of the project? ............................................................................................. 2 How was the Preferred Alternative Selected? ............................................................................ 4 What are the key points of this report? ....................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................... 7 How did we Collect Information on Environmental Justice for this Report?............................. 7 What is the study area for this Environmental Justice analysis? ................................................ 8 Are there gathering places, businesses, or services in or near the study area that are important to environmental justice populations? ...................................................................................... 10 What are the community cohesion and population characteristics in the study area? .............. 11 What are the growth trends in the study area? .......................................................................... 11 Chapter 3: Public Involvement .................................................................................................... 12 How will minority or low-income populations be involved? ................................................... 12 What public involvement activities are ongoing? ..................................................................... 13 Chapter 4: Potential Effects ......................................................................................................... 13 What methods did we use to evaluate potential effects on EJ populations? ............................. 13 What are the potential construction effects? ............................................................................. 15 What are the operational effects? .............................................................................................. 16 What are the indirect effects of the project? ............................................................................. 17 What are the cumulative effects of the project? ........................................................................ 18 Chapter 5: Measures to Avoid or Minimize Project Effects ......................................................... 18 How will we avoid or minimize adverse effects from construction? ....................................... 18 How will we avoid or minimize permanent adverse effects from the project? ........................ 19 Chapter 6: Environmental Justice Determination ......................................................................... 19 Will this project have disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority or low-income populations? .............................................................................................................................. 19 References ..................................................................................................................................... 21 Personal Communications .................................................................................................... 21 Documents and Publications ................................................................................................. 21 Web ....................................................................................................................................... 21 Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 23 Appendix A: Methods .................................................................................................................. 25 Appendix B: Supporting Documents ........................................................................................... 29 Exhibits Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map ................................................................................................................. 3 Exhibit 2: Corridor Alternatives Considered Map ......................................................................... 5 Exhibit 3: Study Area North of Proposed Bridge, Census Tract 103 Map ..................................... 9 Exhibit 4: Study Area South of Proposed Bridge, Census Tract 108.03 Map .............................. 10 Exhibit 5: Income Demographic for Census Tracts 103 and 108.3- 2000 Census Table ............. 13 Exhibit 6: Race Demographic for Census Tracts 103 and 108.3- 2006-2008 Census Table ........ 13 Exhibit 7: School Demographic Data Table ................................................................................. 14 Chapter 1: Introduction What alternatives were analyzed? This report includes analysis of one build alternative and one “no build” or “no action” alternative. The report also suggests a range of mitigation measures to relieve any potential negative effects on Environmental Justice populations. This approach is consistent with FHWA’s guidelines for preparing a NEPA EA. What is the No Build alternative? The No Build Alternative is assumed to maintain the status quo: only routine activities such as road maintenance, repair, and safety improvements would occur within the corridor between now and 2032. The No Build Alternative does not include improvements that would increase roadway capacity or reduce congestion on feeder streets to I-182 or other surface streets in the City of Richland. What are the principal features of the build alternative? . Construction of a four lane bridge; with two 11-foot travel lanes and a 12-foot pedestrian/bicycle path on the upriver side of the bridge. Sidewalks will be installed between City View Drive and Tanglewood Drive to connect with the existing network. The north-east segment of Duportail Street will be extended south to connect with the proposed bridge, and will be widened north, to between Cottonwood Drive and Birch Avenue; sidewalks will be added where needed to connect with the existing network. Tanglewood Drive will be extended eastward to intersect with Duportail Street north of the proposed bridge and terminate in a dead end approximately 700 feet east of the proposed intersection. The intersection of Duportail Street and SR 240 will be upgraded to handle higher traffic volumes. The BNSF railroad tracks running parallel to SR 240 will be raised to the same grade as the intersection of SR 240 and Duportail Street. SR 240 will be widened on both sides of intersection with Duportail Street due to the addition of right turn exit lanes from SR 240 onto Duportail Street. A new access road will be built from Tanglewood Drive cul-de-sac behind the Shoreline Village apartment complex east of Duportail Street to the Desert Streams Bible Church. The existing water main crossing within the Yakima River will be replaced and placed on the bridge. The existing CID (Columbia Irrigation District) canal south of the proposed bridge will be enclosed under the proposed bridge. A drainage/detention pond will be installed southeast of the intersection of Duportail Street and Tanglewood Drive. The existing parking lot used to access the boat launch and trails on the north side of the bridge will be re-constructed. A trail will be constructed under the new bridge to connect with the existing riverfront trails on the north side of the bridge. 1 What is the purpose of the project? The purpose of this project is to create another crossing of the Yakima River to aid in the movement of traffic, and improve emergency vehicle response times from the south side of the Yakima River to the north by providing a bridge that will address current and future transportation needs. An additional north-south crossing in the city of Richland aims to improve mobility for cars, bicycles, pedestrians and public transit, and will alleviate current and future congestion within the SR 240 and I-182 corridor areas. All new pedestrian facilities will be designed to seamlessly blend with the existing facilities, and will be compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, as amended1. Refer to Figure 1 for a map depicting the proposed project. 1 Civil Rights Division. 2010. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services. September 15. Department of Justice. Federal Register 75 (178): 56164-56358. Accessed January24, 2011. http://frwebgate2.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=4AwcwM/0/1/0&WAISaction=retrieve 2 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles ¯ 1 in = 0.5 miles Columbia River Columbia Duportail Street Bridge Figure 1: Vicinity Map Duportail
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program Annual Report for July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014
    Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program Annual Report for July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014 Dedicated to Community-Based Salmon Enhancement in Washington State Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program Annual Report for July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 A Message from the Board President . 2 WDFW’s Mission . 3 RFEG Program Areas . 4 RFEG Program Accomplishments and Expenditures . 5 Geographical Boundaries . 6 Region 1 – Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Association . 8 Region 2 – Skagit Fisheries Enhancement Group . 13 Region 3 – Sound Salmon Solutions . 18 Region 4 – Mid-Sound Fisheries Enhancement Group . 22 Region 5 – South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group . 26 Region 6 – Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group . 29 Region 7 – North Olympic Salmon Coalition . 36 Region 8 – Pacific Coast Salmon Coalition . 40 Region 9 – Chehalis Basin Fisheries Task Force . 44 Region 10 – Willapa Bay Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group . 47 Region 11 – Lower Columbia Fish Enhancement Group . 50 Region 12 – Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group . 55 Region 13 – Tri-State Steelheaders Salmon Enhancement Group . 60 Region 14 – Cascade Columbia Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group . 64 Front cover photos provided by: Skagit Fisheries Enhancement Group and Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Back cover photo provided by: Lower Columbia Fish Enhancement Group, Cascade Columbia Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group, and Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program | July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014 Annual Report Executive Summary Dedicated to Community-Based Salmon Enhancement in Washington State The Regional Fisheries Enhancement Groups (RFEGs) efficiently extend the impact of base funding, often by 10- are a statewide network of non-profit community- 1, by engaging diverse partners and citizens in conservation based salmon enhancement organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanford Reach Fall Chinook Salmon Redd Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2018
    HNF-64542 Revision 0 Hanford Reach Fall Chinook Salmon Redd Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2018 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-64542 Revision 0 Hanford Reach Fall Chinook Redd Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2018 J. J. Nugent and C. T. Lindsey Mission Support Alliance Date Published February 2020 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 By Lynn M. Ayers at 9:50 am, Feb 06, 2020 Release Approval Date Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-64542 Revision 0 TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. This report has been reproduced from the best available copy. Printed in the United States of America HNF-64542 Revision 0 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODS...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan 2010-2014
    E TRI-CITIES CONSOLIDATED PLAN THE 2010-2014 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN FOR KENNEWICK, PASCO, AND RICHLAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF RICHLAND John Fox, Mayor Cynthia D. Johnson, City Manager RICHLAND CITY COUNCIL Edward Revell, Mayor Pro Tem Rita Mazur, Council Member Dave Rose, Council Member Sheila Sullivan, Council Member Bob Thompson, Council Member Sandra Kent, Council Member HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Marchell Mascheck, Chair Richard Nordgren, Vice Chair Alice Bryant Chad Mitchell Karlene Navarre Michael Mills Jerry Ball Adam Morasch Jason Heineman PLANNING AND REDEVELOPMENT Joseph Schiessl, Planning and Redevelopment Manager Deborah Bluher, CDBG/HOME Administrator Michelle Burden, Housing Resources Specialist CITY OF KENNEWICK Thomas C. Moak, Mayor Robert R. Hammond, City Manager KENNEWICK CITY COUNCIL Marge Price, Mayor Pro Tem James Hempstead, Council Member Bob Olson, Council Member Paul Parish, Council Member Bob Parks, Council Member Steve Young, Council Member COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Ron Hue, Chair Ed Mulhausen, Vice Chair Gary Earp John Grace Marilyn Hyde Pat Johnstone-Jones Bobbie Littrell Don Miksch Roger Nelson Mark Reed Vel Wright CORPORATE & COMMUNITY SERVICES, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Kevin Ferguson, Assistant City Manager Carol Hughs Evans, Community Development Coordinator Darlene Mendoza, Housing Specialist CITY OF PASCO Mayor Joyce Olson, District 4 Gary Crutchfield, City Manager PASCO CITY COUNCIL Mayor Pro-Tem Matt Watkins, At Large Councilman Al Yenney, District 1 Councilman Mike Garrison, District 2 Councilman Bob Hoffmann, District 3 Councilman Rebecca Francik, District 5 Councilman Tom Larsen, At Large PLANNING COMMISSION Chair Todd Samuel, Position 1 James L. Hay, Position 2 Andy Anderson, Position 3 David O.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 11 Issue Number 20 Northwest Oregon and Washington's Most
    The Guide's Forecast - volume 11 issue number 20 Northwest Oregon and Washington’s most complete and accurate fishing forecast Forecasting for the fishing week of May 15th – May 21st, 2009 Oregon Fisheries Update: Willamette Valley/Metro- Biologists met by phone yesterday to discuss modifications to spring fishing opportunities in order to keep impacts to Snake River salmon in check given the change in run size. The run size has been downgraded to a range of 120,000 to 150,000 salmon, prompting necessary adjustments to help ensure resource users don’t go over on their respective impact percents. Fish managers are postponing the mainstem steelhead opener until sufficient salmon passage at Bonneville is realized or until mid-June when the salmon run shifts to the summer variety. Meanwhile, reports of excellent sturgeon fishing for keepers is coming from the gorge downstream of the Marker 85 deadline. Creel checks indicate 150 keeper sturgeon were caught for 141 rods of which 88 legal sized fish were released. Although productive sturgeon fishing this time of year isn’t unprecedented, the recent introduction of the Marker 85 deadline all but cut off the most productive section for keeper sturgeon this time of year. Strong flows may be pushing sturgeon out of the Bonneville area. Quality keepers were falling to smelt the last few weeks. Daily counts at Willamette Falls fell off as the water temperature dropped. As of May 9th, over 6,000 springers had been counted but only 2,000 summer steelhead. Sturgeon fishing is fair to good below the St. Johns Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 11 Issue Number 21 Northwest Oregon and Washington’S Most Complete and Accurate Fishing Forecast
    The Guide's Forecast - volume 11 issue number 21 Northwest Oregon and Washington’s most complete and accurate fishing forecast Forecasting for the fishing week of May 22nd – May 28th, 2009 Oregon Fisheries Update: Willamette Valley/Metro- The red-hot sturgeon fishery in the gorge has slowed dramatically indicating keeper sized fish are moving downstream in anticipation of summer feeding opportunities near the estuary. Catches remained respectable however with 30 keepers landed for 70 boats below the Marker 85 deadline. Smelt remains a top bait. Shad fishing is still open on the mainstem Columbia but catches are slow. Jack counts continue to set a record pace at Bonneville with jacks outnumbering adults every day now. If run models become reliable again, 2010 is likely to be a record return. Steelhead fishing remains closed until further notice. A few shad are being caught at Oregon City. Sturgeon fishing is producing keepers in the lower Willamette to those who seek them out with a variety of bait. Spring chinook are being hooked on plugs below Leaburg Dam. Those targeting summer steelhead are also taking a few. Look for Green McKenzie Caddis hatching on the lower river where water conditions are good for fishing. The North Santiam has summer steelhead scattered throughout the system. Fishing will improve once the water level and temperature stabilize. Some springers have been caught on the South Santiam around Sweet Home and Waterloo. The Clackamas has springers and summers available with anglers taking a few here and there. The Sandy River is still running high but prospects should improve over the weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • HNF-65646 Revision 0 Approved for Public Release Further
    HNF-65646 Revision 0 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-65646 Revision 0 HNF-65646 Revision 0 J. J. Nugent Mission Support Alliance Date Published October 2020 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 By Sarah Harrison at 1:34 pm, Nov 05, 2020 Release Approval Date Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-65646 Revision 0 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODS.................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................... 7 5.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 1. Aerial Survey Areas for Fall Chinook Salmon Redds Used Historically and in
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Fish Health Inspections for Priest Rapids Hatchery Fall Chinook Salmon, Brood Years 2006-2017
    Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2017-2018 Steven P. Richards Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife And Todd N. Pearsons Public Utility District Number 2 of Grant County, Washington October 22, 2018 Disclaimer This report is provided as an annual data update of the Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington’s (Grant PUD’s) monitoring and evaluation plan for Priest Rapids Hatchery. All data are provisional and subject to change as new data and analyses become available. Readers are cautioned to use data at their own risk and should consult the most current report to obtain the most current and accurate information. Data sets will become final when they are published in peer reviewed scientific journals. This report should be cited as: Richards, S.P. and T.N. Pearsons. 2018. Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2017-2018. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Ephrata, Washington. © 2018, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNDER U.S. AND FOREIGN LAW, TREATIES AND CONVENTIONS. i Executive Summary This report is the eighth annual report dedicated to monitoring and evaluating the Priest Rapids Hatchery (PRH) production of fall Chinook salmon. The PRH is located below Priest Rapids Dam adjacent to the Columbia River and has been in operation since 1963. The monitoring and evaluation program associated with PRH is intended to evaluate the performance of the program in meeting hatchery and natural production goals. This report is intended to be cumulative, but also focus attention on the most recent year of data collection and production (2017-2018).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Purpose and Approach
    DATE: March 26, 2018 TO: Marv Kinney, Port of Benton FROM: Emily Picha and Morgan Shook, ECONorthwest SUBJECT: Columbia Point South – High-Level Feasibility Analysis 1 Purpose and Approach The purpose of this development options analysis is to provide a qualitative, high-level review of a set of potential development concepts at Columbia Point South so that the City and its partners can further examine the best opportunities to pursue. ECONorthwest’s work began in Fall 2017 with an analysis of existing conditions at the site to get a better understanding of the scale of development that could be possible on the site and the associated zoning entitlements that could be allowed. It also includes an overview of the history of the site, including its cultural importance to local tribes. This document is provided in Appendix C. The next step was to hold a workshop with the City, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR), and the Port of Benton to review existing conditions and identify goals, objectives, and key considerations. At this workshop, the City of Richland, CTUIR, and the Port of Benton outlined a set of goals for development at the property, which are summarized in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1. Goals of the Stakeholders Stakeholders Stated Goals City of • Continue coordinating with CTUIR on potential development options. Richland • Find uses that advance the city's economic and community development goals, leveraging the natural advantages of the waterfront. • Balance development with open space and environmental protection. Port of Benton • Provide assistance as needed to the City of Richland, CTUIR, and other partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Filed As WSR 21-11-114 on May 19, 2021
    CODE REVISER USE ONLY PROPOSED RULE MAKING CR-102 (October 2017) (Implements RCW 34.05.320) Do NOT use for expedited rule making Agency: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) ☒ Original Notice ☐ Supplemental Notice to WSR ☐ Continuance of WSR ☒ Preproposal Statement of Inquiry was filed as WSR 21-02-079 filed January 5, 2021 ; or ☐ Expedited Rule Making--Proposed notice was filed as WSR ; or ☐ Proposal is exempt under RCW 34.05.310(4) or 34.05.330(1); or ☐ Proposal is exempt under RCW . Title of rule and other identifying information: (describe subject) The department is considering amendments to current recreational fishing rules resulting from stakeholder recommendations made during North of Falcon meetings. 220-220-160 – Two-pole endorsement 220-312-020 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Coast 220-312-030 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Southwest 220-312-040 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Puget Sound 220-312-050 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Eastside 220-312-060 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Columbia River 220-313-060 – Puget Sound salmon – Saltwater seasons and daily limits 220-313-070 – Coastal salmon – Saltwater seasons and daily limits Hearing location(s): Date: Time: Location: (be specific) Comment: June 22, 2021 9:00 AM Zoom Webinar Register for this webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_VaVjG8 BOSq2sxdVAwPocHQ After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Date of intended
    [Show full text]
  • 5–17–07 Vol. 72 No. 95 Thursday May 17, 2007 Pages 27721–27948
    5–17–07 Thursday Vol. 72 No. 95 May 17, 2007 Pages 27721–27948 VerDate Aug 31 2005 18:47 May 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\17MYWS.LOC 17MYWS sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES II Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2018-2019
    Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2018-2019 Steven P. Richards Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife And Todd N. Pearsons Public Utility District Number 2 of Grant County, Washington October 21, 2019 Disclaimer This report is provided as an annual data update of the Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington’s (Grant PUD’s) monitoring and evaluation plan for Priest Rapids Hatchery. All data are provisional and subject to change as new data and analyses become available. Readers are cautioned to use data at their own risk and should consult the most current report to obtain the most current and accurate information. Data sets will become final when they are published in peer reviewed scientific journals. This report should be cited as: Richards, S.P. and T.N. Pearsons. 2019. Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2018-2019. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Ephrata, Washington. © 2019, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNDER U.S. AND FOREIGN LAW, TREATIES AND CONVENTIONS. i Executive Summary This report is the ninth annual report dedicated to monitoring and evaluating the Priest Rapids Hatchery (PRH) production of fall Chinook salmon. The PRH is located below Priest Rapids Dam adjacent to the Columbia River and has been in operation since 1963. The monitoring and evaluation program associated with PRH is intended to evaluate the performance of the program in meeting hatchery and natural production goals. This report is intended to be cumulative, but also focus attention on the most recent year of data collection and production (2018-2019).
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM Annual Report for July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002
    REGIONAL FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM Annual Report for July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife TABLE OF CONTENTS Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program / Annual Report for July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002 Executive Summary . PAGE 1-2 Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group Advisory Board . PAGE 3 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and the RFEG Program . PAGE 4 Tables and Graphs . PAGE 5 Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group Boundaries (Map) . PAGE 6-8 Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group Contact List . PAGE 9 RFEG Overviews and Project Descriptions Region 1 — Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Association . PAGE 11-15 Region 2 — Skagit Fisheries Enhancement Group . PAGE 16-20 Region 3 — Stilly-Snohomish Fisheries Enhancement Task Force . PAGE 21-25 Region 4 — Mid-Puget Sound Fisheries Enhancement Group . PAGE 26-30 Region 5 — South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group . PAGE 31-36 Region 6 — Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group . PAGE 37-40 Region 7 — North Olympic Salmon Coalition . PAGE 41-45 Region 8 — Pacific Coast Salmon Coalition . PAGE 46-48 Region 9 — Chehalis River Basin Fisheries Task Force . PAGE 49-53 Region 10 — Willapa Bay Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group . PAGE 54-56 Region 11 — Lower Columbia Fish Enhancement Group . PAGE 57-60 Region 12 — Mid Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group . PAGE 61-64 Region 13 — Tri-State Steelheaders Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group . PAGE 65-69 Region 14 — Upper Columbia Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group . PAGE 70-74 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program / Annual Report for July 1, 2001 - June 30, 2002 “The salmon is the living icon of the quality of life in the Pacific Northwest.” —Honorable Gary Locke, Governor of the State of Washington O VERVIEW In 1990, the Washington State Legislature created the Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program to involve local communities, citizen volunteers, and landowners in the state’s salmon recovery efforts.
    [Show full text]