DOCSLIB.ORG

Hanford Site Ecological Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hanford Site Ecological Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2017 HNF-63012 Rev. 0 Hanford Site Ecological Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2017 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-63012 Rev. 0 Hanford Site Ecological Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2017 Date Published December 2018 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 CI P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 By Lynn M. Ayers at 7:03 am, Jun 26, 2019 Release Approval Date Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. This report has been reproduced from the best available copy. Printed in the United States of America HNF-63012 Rev. 0 Page Intentionally Left Blank Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-63012, REV. 0 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Scope .......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 Regulatory Basis ............................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Hanford Site Physiography .............................................................................................. 1-4 1.3.1 Climate ................................................................................................................ 1-6 1.3.2 River Dynamics .................................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.3 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................ 1-8 1.3.4 Vegetation........................................................................................................... 1-8 2.0 Resource Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Fall Chinook Salmon Redd Counts 2016 .......................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Methods .............................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.3 Results ................................................................................................................. 2-6 2.1.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 2-7 2.2 Steelhead Redd Counts 2017 ......................................................................................... 2-11 2.3 Bald Eagles ..................................................................................................................... 2-14 2.3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2-14 2.3.2 Methods ............................................................................................................ 2-17 2.3.3 Results and Discussion ...................................................................................... 2-22 2.3.4 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 2-28 2.4 Burrowing Owls .............................................................................................................. 2-30 2.4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2-30 2.4.2 Methods ............................................................................................................ 2-33 2.4.3 Results ............................................................................................................... 2-38 2.4.4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 2-43 2.5 Ferruginous Hawk Nesting Territory Occupancy and Productivity Surveys 2017 ......... 2-44 2.5.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2-44 2.5.2 Methods ............................................................................................................ 2-45 2.5.3 Results ............................................................................................................... 2-47 2.5.4 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 2-47 2.6 Rookeries ....................................................................................................................... 2-49 2.7 Roadside Bird Surveys 2017 ........................................................................................... 2-51 2.7.1 Objectives and Scope ........................................................................................ 2-56 2.7.2 Methods ............................................................................................................ 2-56 2.7.3 Roadside Bird Survey Results ............................................................................ 2-57 2.7.4 Discussion ......................................................................................................... 2-61 2.8 Townsend’s Ground Squirrel Monitoring ...................................................................... 2-62 2.8.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2-62 2.8.2 Ground Squirrels on the Hanford Site .............................................................. 2-62 2.8.3 Habitat Suitability Modeling of Townsend’s Ground Squirrels ........................ 2-63 2.8.4 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 2-69 2.8.5 Methods ............................................................................................................ 2-69 2.8.6 Results ............................................................................................................... 2-73 2.8.7 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 2-76 i HNF-63012, REV. 0 2.9 Hanford Site Bat Monitoring .......................................................................................... 2-77 2.9.1 Objectives and Scope ........................................................................................ 2-78 2.9.2 Methods and Results ........................................................................................ 2-78 2.10 Vernal Pools ................................................................................................................... 2-82 2.10.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2-82 2.10.2 Historical Overview of the Vernal Pools on the Hanford Site ........................... 2-85 2.10.3 2017 Monitoring Methods ................................................................................ 2-86 2.10.4 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................ 2-90 2.10.5 Management Actions and Proposed Future Monitoring ................................ 2-116 3.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 3-1 FIGURES Figure 1-1. Map and General Features of the Hanford Site ...................................................................... 1-5 Figure 1-2. The Hanford Site within the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion ..................................................... 1-6 Figure 1-3. Soils on the Benton County Portion of the Hanford Site (BNWL-243) ................................. 1-10 Figure 1-4. Upland Vegetation on Hanford Site DOE-Managed Lands (HNF-61417) .............................. 1-11 Figure 2-1. Aerial Survey Areas for Fall Chinook Redds Used Historically and in 2016 ............................ 2-3 Figure 2-2. Fall Chinook Survey Sub-areas Adjacent to Groundwater Contamination Plumes ................ 2-4 Figure 2-3. Visual Hanford Reach Fall Chinook Salmon Redd Counts 1948 to 2016................................. 2-8 Figure 2-4. A Comparison of Five-Year Flow History in the Hanford Reach Prior to a Year of High (top panel) and Low (middle panel) Number of Returning Fall Chinook Salmon (bottom panel) .......... 2-10 Figure 2-5. Columbia River Flows in the Hanford Reach in Spring 2017 ................................................. 2-13 Figure 2-6. Protected Bald Eagle Night Roosts for Fiscal Year 2017 ....................................................... 2-16 Figure 2-7. Locations Monitored for Bald Eagle Night Roosting During Fiscal Year 2017 ...................... 2-18 Figure 2-8. Area Surveyed by Boat
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program Annual Report for July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014
    Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program Annual Report for July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014 Dedicated to Community-Based Salmon Enhancement in Washington State Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program Annual Report for July 1, 2013 - June 30, 2014 Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 A Message from the Board President . 2 WDFW’s Mission . 3 RFEG Program Areas . 4 RFEG Program Accomplishments and Expenditures . 5 Geographical Boundaries . 6 Region 1 – Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Association . 8 Region 2 – Skagit Fisheries Enhancement Group . 13 Region 3 – Sound Salmon Solutions . 18 Region 4 – Mid-Sound Fisheries Enhancement Group . 22 Region 5 – South Puget Sound Salmon Enhancement Group . 26 Region 6 – Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group . 29 Region 7 – North Olympic Salmon Coalition . 36 Region 8 – Pacific Coast Salmon Coalition . 40 Region 9 – Chehalis Basin Fisheries Task Force . 44 Region 10 – Willapa Bay Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group . 47 Region 11 – Lower Columbia Fish Enhancement Group . 50 Region 12 – Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group . 55 Region 13 – Tri-State Steelheaders Salmon Enhancement Group . 60 Region 14 – Cascade Columbia Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group . 64 Front cover photos provided by: Skagit Fisheries Enhancement Group and Mid-Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Back cover photo provided by: Lower Columbia Fish Enhancement Group, Cascade Columbia Regional Fisheries Enhancement Group, and Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program | July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014 Annual Report Executive Summary Dedicated to Community-Based Salmon Enhancement in Washington State The Regional Fisheries Enhancement Groups (RFEGs) efficiently extend the impact of base funding, often by 10- are a statewide network of non-profit community- 1, by engaging diverse partners and citizens in conservation based salmon enhancement organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanford Reach Fall Chinook Salmon Redd Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2018
    HNF-64542 Revision 0 Hanford Reach Fall Chinook Salmon Redd Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2018 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-64542 Revision 0 Hanford Reach Fall Chinook Redd Monitoring Report for Calendar Year 2018 J. J. Nugent and C. T. Lindsey Mission Support Alliance Date Published February 2020 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 By Lynn M. Ayers at 9:50 am, Feb 06, 2020 Release Approval Date Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-64542 Revision 0 TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. This report has been reproduced from the best available copy. Printed in the United States of America HNF-64542 Revision 0 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODS...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Justice Discipline Report Duportail Bridge Project, City of Richland, WA
    Environmental Justice Discipline Report Duportail Bridge Project, City of Richland, WA Prepared by: Federal Highway Administration 711 South Capitol Way, Suite 501 Olympia, WA 98501 Washington State Department of Transportation P.O. Box 12560 Yakima, WA 98909 October,January 24, 2011 2011 This page left blank intentionally for printing purposes. Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 What alternatives were analyzed? ............................................................................................... 1 What is the No Build alternative? ............................................................................................... 1 What are the principal features of the build alternative? ............................................................ 1 What is the purpose of the project? ............................................................................................. 2 How was the Preferred Alternative Selected? ............................................................................ 4 What are the key points of this report? ....................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................... 7 How did we Collect Information on Environmental Justice for this Report?............................. 7 What is the study area for this Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan 2010-2014
    E TRI-CITIES CONSOLIDATED PLAN THE 2010-2014 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN FOR KENNEWICK, PASCO, AND RICHLAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF RICHLAND John Fox, Mayor Cynthia D. Johnson, City Manager RICHLAND CITY COUNCIL Edward Revell, Mayor Pro Tem Rita Mazur, Council Member Dave Rose, Council Member Sheila Sullivan, Council Member Bob Thompson, Council Member Sandra Kent, Council Member HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Marchell Mascheck, Chair Richard Nordgren, Vice Chair Alice Bryant Chad Mitchell Karlene Navarre Michael Mills Jerry Ball Adam Morasch Jason Heineman PLANNING AND REDEVELOPMENT Joseph Schiessl, Planning and Redevelopment Manager Deborah Bluher, CDBG/HOME Administrator Michelle Burden, Housing Resources Specialist CITY OF KENNEWICK Thomas C. Moak, Mayor Robert R. Hammond, City Manager KENNEWICK CITY COUNCIL Marge Price, Mayor Pro Tem James Hempstead, Council Member Bob Olson, Council Member Paul Parish, Council Member Bob Parks, Council Member Steve Young, Council Member COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ADVISORY COMMITTEE Ron Hue, Chair Ed Mulhausen, Vice Chair Gary Earp John Grace Marilyn Hyde Pat Johnstone-Jones Bobbie Littrell Don Miksch Roger Nelson Mark Reed Vel Wright CORPORATE & COMMUNITY SERVICES, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Kevin Ferguson, Assistant City Manager Carol Hughs Evans, Community Development Coordinator Darlene Mendoza, Housing Specialist CITY OF PASCO Mayor Joyce Olson, District 4 Gary Crutchfield, City Manager PASCO CITY COUNCIL Mayor Pro-Tem Matt Watkins, At Large Councilman Al Yenney, District 1 Councilman Mike Garrison, District 2 Councilman Bob Hoffmann, District 3 Councilman Rebecca Francik, District 5 Councilman Tom Larsen, At Large PLANNING COMMISSION Chair Todd Samuel, Position 1 James L. Hay, Position 2 Andy Anderson, Position 3 David O.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 11 Issue Number 20 Northwest Oregon and Washington's Most
    The Guide's Forecast - volume 11 issue number 20 Northwest Oregon and Washington’s most complete and accurate fishing forecast Forecasting for the fishing week of May 15th – May 21st, 2009 Oregon Fisheries Update: Willamette Valley/Metro- Biologists met by phone yesterday to discuss modifications to spring fishing opportunities in order to keep impacts to Snake River salmon in check given the change in run size. The run size has been downgraded to a range of 120,000 to 150,000 salmon, prompting necessary adjustments to help ensure resource users don’t go over on their respective impact percents. Fish managers are postponing the mainstem steelhead opener until sufficient salmon passage at Bonneville is realized or until mid-June when the salmon run shifts to the summer variety. Meanwhile, reports of excellent sturgeon fishing for keepers is coming from the gorge downstream of the Marker 85 deadline. Creel checks indicate 150 keeper sturgeon were caught for 141 rods of which 88 legal sized fish were released. Although productive sturgeon fishing this time of year isn’t unprecedented, the recent introduction of the Marker 85 deadline all but cut off the most productive section for keeper sturgeon this time of year. Strong flows may be pushing sturgeon out of the Bonneville area. Quality keepers were falling to smelt the last few weeks. Daily counts at Willamette Falls fell off as the water temperature dropped. As of May 9th, over 6,000 springers had been counted but only 2,000 summer steelhead. Sturgeon fishing is fair to good below the St. Johns Bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 11 Issue Number 21 Northwest Oregon and Washington’S Most Complete and Accurate Fishing Forecast
    The Guide's Forecast - volume 11 issue number 21 Northwest Oregon and Washington’s most complete and accurate fishing forecast Forecasting for the fishing week of May 22nd – May 28th, 2009 Oregon Fisheries Update: Willamette Valley/Metro- The red-hot sturgeon fishery in the gorge has slowed dramatically indicating keeper sized fish are moving downstream in anticipation of summer feeding opportunities near the estuary. Catches remained respectable however with 30 keepers landed for 70 boats below the Marker 85 deadline. Smelt remains a top bait. Shad fishing is still open on the mainstem Columbia but catches are slow. Jack counts continue to set a record pace at Bonneville with jacks outnumbering adults every day now. If run models become reliable again, 2010 is likely to be a record return. Steelhead fishing remains closed until further notice. A few shad are being caught at Oregon City. Sturgeon fishing is producing keepers in the lower Willamette to those who seek them out with a variety of bait. Spring chinook are being hooked on plugs below Leaburg Dam. Those targeting summer steelhead are also taking a few. Look for Green McKenzie Caddis hatching on the lower river where water conditions are good for fishing. The North Santiam has summer steelhead scattered throughout the system. Fishing will improve once the water level and temperature stabilize. Some springers have been caught on the South Santiam around Sweet Home and Waterloo. The Clackamas has springers and summers available with anglers taking a few here and there. The Sandy River is still running high but prospects should improve over the weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • HNF-65646 Revision 0 Approved for Public Release Further
    HNF-65646 Revision 0 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 650 Richland, Washington 99352 Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-65646 Revision 0 HNF-65646 Revision 0 J. J. Nugent Mission Support Alliance Date Published October 2020 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management Contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728 P.O. Box 550 Richland, Washington 99352 By Sarah Harrison at 1:34 pm, Nov 05, 2020 Release Approval Date Approved for Public Release Further Dissemination Unlimited HNF-65646 Revision 0 1.0 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODS.................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................... 7 5.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 1. Aerial Survey Areas for Fall Chinook Salmon Redds Used Historically and in
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Fish Health Inspections for Priest Rapids Hatchery Fall Chinook Salmon, Brood Years 2006-2017
    Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2017-2018 Steven P. Richards Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife And Todd N. Pearsons Public Utility District Number 2 of Grant County, Washington October 22, 2018 Disclaimer This report is provided as an annual data update of the Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington’s (Grant PUD’s) monitoring and evaluation plan for Priest Rapids Hatchery. All data are provisional and subject to change as new data and analyses become available. Readers are cautioned to use data at their own risk and should consult the most current report to obtain the most current and accurate information. Data sets will become final when they are published in peer reviewed scientific journals. This report should be cited as: Richards, S.P. and T.N. Pearsons. 2018. Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2017-2018. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Ephrata, Washington. © 2018, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNDER U.S. AND FOREIGN LAW, TREATIES AND CONVENTIONS. i Executive Summary This report is the eighth annual report dedicated to monitoring and evaluating the Priest Rapids Hatchery (PRH) production of fall Chinook salmon. The PRH is located below Priest Rapids Dam adjacent to the Columbia River and has been in operation since 1963. The monitoring and evaluation program associated with PRH is intended to evaluate the performance of the program in meeting hatchery and natural production goals. This report is intended to be cumulative, but also focus attention on the most recent year of data collection and production (2017-2018).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Purpose and Approach
    DATE: March 26, 2018 TO: Marv Kinney, Port of Benton FROM: Emily Picha and Morgan Shook, ECONorthwest SUBJECT: Columbia Point South – High-Level Feasibility Analysis 1 Purpose and Approach The purpose of this development options analysis is to provide a qualitative, high-level review of a set of potential development concepts at Columbia Point South so that the City and its partners can further examine the best opportunities to pursue. ECONorthwest’s work began in Fall 2017 with an analysis of existing conditions at the site to get a better understanding of the scale of development that could be possible on the site and the associated zoning entitlements that could be allowed. It also includes an overview of the history of the site, including its cultural importance to local tribes. This document is provided in Appendix C. The next step was to hold a workshop with the City, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR), and the Port of Benton to review existing conditions and identify goals, objectives, and key considerations. At this workshop, the City of Richland, CTUIR, and the Port of Benton outlined a set of goals for development at the property, which are summarized in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1. Goals of the Stakeholders Stakeholders Stated Goals City of • Continue coordinating with CTUIR on potential development options. Richland • Find uses that advance the city's economic and community development goals, leveraging the natural advantages of the waterfront. • Balance development with open space and environmental protection. Port of Benton • Provide assistance as needed to the City of Richland, CTUIR, and other partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Filed As WSR 21-11-114 on May 19, 2021
    CODE REVISER USE ONLY PROPOSED RULE MAKING CR-102 (October 2017) (Implements RCW 34.05.320) Do NOT use for expedited rule making Agency: Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) ☒ Original Notice ☐ Supplemental Notice to WSR ☐ Continuance of WSR ☒ Preproposal Statement of Inquiry was filed as WSR 21-02-079 filed January 5, 2021 ; or ☐ Expedited Rule Making--Proposed notice was filed as WSR ; or ☐ Proposal is exempt under RCW 34.05.310(4) or 34.05.330(1); or ☐ Proposal is exempt under RCW . Title of rule and other identifying information: (describe subject) The department is considering amendments to current recreational fishing rules resulting from stakeholder recommendations made during North of Falcon meetings. 220-220-160 – Two-pole endorsement 220-312-020 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Coast 220-312-030 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Southwest 220-312-040 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Puget Sound 220-312-050 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Eastside 220-312-060 – Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules – Columbia River 220-313-060 – Puget Sound salmon – Saltwater seasons and daily limits 220-313-070 – Coastal salmon – Saltwater seasons and daily limits Hearing location(s): Date: Time: Location: (be specific) Comment: June 22, 2021 9:00 AM Zoom Webinar Register for this webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_VaVjG8 BOSq2sxdVAwPocHQ After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Date of intended
    [Show full text]
  • 5–17–07 Vol. 72 No. 95 Thursday May 17, 2007 Pages 27721–27948
    5–17–07 Thursday Vol. 72 No. 95 May 17, 2007 Pages 27721–27948 VerDate Aug 31 2005 18:47 May 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\17MYWS.LOC 17MYWS sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES II Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2018-2019
    Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2018-2019 Steven P. Richards Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife And Todd N. Pearsons Public Utility District Number 2 of Grant County, Washington October 21, 2019 Disclaimer This report is provided as an annual data update of the Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington’s (Grant PUD’s) monitoring and evaluation plan for Priest Rapids Hatchery. All data are provisional and subject to change as new data and analyses become available. Readers are cautioned to use data at their own risk and should consult the most current report to obtain the most current and accurate information. Data sets will become final when they are published in peer reviewed scientific journals. This report should be cited as: Richards, S.P. and T.N. Pearsons. 2019. Priest Rapids Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation Annual Report for 2018-2019. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Ephrata, Washington. © 2019, PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNDER U.S. AND FOREIGN LAW, TREATIES AND CONVENTIONS. i Executive Summary This report is the ninth annual report dedicated to monitoring and evaluating the Priest Rapids Hatchery (PRH) production of fall Chinook salmon. The PRH is located below Priest Rapids Dam adjacent to the Columbia River and has been in operation since 1963. The monitoring and evaluation program associated with PRH is intended to evaluate the performance of the program in meeting hatchery and natural production goals. This report is intended to be cumulative, but also focus attention on the most recent year of data collection and production (2018-2019).
    [Show full text]