DOCSLIB.ORG

Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education (CAMMSE @ UNC Charlotte) the University of North Carolina at Charlotte 9201 University City Blvd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education (CAMMSE @ UNC Charlotte) the University of North Carolina at Charlotte 9201 University City Blvd Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education Project ID: 2018 Project 15 INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT ATTRIBUTES ON BICYCLING MODE SHARE AS A MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY STRATEGY IN LARGE CITIES: A CASE STUDY IN HOUSTON Final Report by Mehdi Azimi, PhD, PE (ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5678-032) Assistant Professor, Department of Transportation Studies, Texas Southern University Phone: (713) 313-1293; E-mail: [email protected] Lan Lan (ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4833-788X) Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Transportation Studies, Texas Southern University Phone: (713) 313-5696; E-mail: [email protected] Mohammed Suyedur Luqman Rahman (ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-8557) Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Transportation Studies, Texas Southern University Phone: (713) 313-5696; E-mail: [email protected] Yi Qi, PhD (ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6314-2626) Professor and Chair, Department of Transportation Studies, Texas Southern University Phone: (713) 313-6809; E-mail: [email protected] for Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education (CAMMSE @ UNC Charlotte) The University of North Carolina at Charlotte 9201 University City Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28223 September 2019 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by the Center for Advanced Multimodal Mobility Solutions and Education (CAMMSE @ UNC Charlotte), one of the Tier I University Transportation Centers that were selected in this nationwide competition by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), US Department of Transportation (US DOT), under the FAST Act. The authors would like to thank Houston BCycle for providing the ridership data. DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are solely responsible for the facts and accuracy of the material and information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the US DOT University Transportation Centers Program in the interest of information exchange. The US Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the US Government. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. iii iv Table of Contents EXCUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... xii 1.1 Problem Statement .................................................................................................................1 1.2 Objectives ..............................................................................................................................1 1.3 Expected Contributions ..........................................................................................................1 1.4 Report Overview ....................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2. Literature Review .......................................................................................................3 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................3 2.2 Bike Share ..............................................................................................................................3 2.3 Temporal Variables Affecting Bike Share .............................................................................6 2.4 Weather Affecting Bike Share ...............................................................................................7 2.5 Built Environment Affecting Bike Share ...............................................................................8 2.6 Summary ................................................................................................................................8 Chapter 3. Solution Methodology ...............................................................................................10 3.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................10 3.2 Study Area and Data Collection ..........................................................................................10 3.3 Descriptive Statistics ............................................................................................................12 3.3.1 Bike Trip Summary ................................................................................................................... 12 3.3.2 Trip by Month ........................................................................................................................... 14 3.3.3 Trip by Day of Week ................................................................................................................. 15 3.3.4 Trip by Hour of Day .................................................................................................................. 15 3.3.5 Trip by Duration ........................................................................................................................ 16 3.4 Preliminary Analysis ............................................................................................................17 3.4.1 Temporal Variables ................................................................................................................... 17 3.4.2 Weather Variables ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.4.3 Built Environment Variables ..................................................................................................... 20 3.5 Choice of Model ..................................................................................................................25 3.6 Analysis and Results ............................................................................................................26 3.7 Summary ..............................................................................................................................31 Chapter 4. Recommend Equity Considerations ........................................................................32 4.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................32 4.2 Bike Share Barriers ..............................................................................................................32 4.3 Houston Bike Share and Equity ...........................................................................................33 4.4 Recommended Strategies for Bike Share Equity in Houston ..............................................34 4.4.1 Temporal Variables ................................................................................................................... 34 4.4.2 Rebalancing ............................................................................................................................... 35 v 4.4.3 Bicycle Infrastructure ................................................................................................................ 35 4.4.4 Facilitated Enrollment ............................................................................................................... 35 4.4.5 Organized Rides ........................................................................................................................ 36 4.4.6 Advertise Bike Share Services .................................................................................................. 36 4.4.7 Community Meetings and Surveys ........................................................................................... 36 4.4.8 Adaptive Bicycles ..................................................................................................................... 37 4.4.9 Internal Operations .................................................................................................................... 37 4.4.10 Lucky Draws and Coupons ..................................................................................................... 37 4.4.11 Internal Operations .................................................................................................................. 38 Chapter 5. Summary and Conclusions ......................................................................................39 5.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................39 5.2 Summary and Conclusions ..................................................................................................39 5.3 Directions for Future Research ............................................................................................40 vi vii List of Figures Figure 2.1: “White Bike” in Amsterdam ........................................................................................ 4 Figure 2.2: “Yellow Bike” in Portland ........................................................................................... 5 Figure 2.3: A Houston BCycle Station ........................................................................................... 5 Figure 3.1: Houston Bike Share Station Location ........................................................................ 11 Figure 3.2: Trip by Membership Type .......................................................................................... 12 Figure 3.3:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rise of Mobility As a Service Reshaping How Urbanites Get Around
    Issue 20 | 2017 Complimentary article reprint The rise of mobility as a service Reshaping how urbanites get around By Warwick Goodall, Tiffany Dovey Fishman, Justine Bornstein, and Brett Bonthron Illustration by Traci Daberko Breakthroughs in self-driving cars are only the beginning: The entire way we travel from point A to point B is changing, creating a new ecosystem of personal mobility. The shift will likely affect far more than transportation and automakers—industries from insurance and health care to energy and media should reconsider how they create value in this emerging environment. Deloitte offers a suite of services to help clients tackle Future of Mobility- related challenges, including setting strategic direction, planning operating models, and implementing new operations and capabilities. Our wide array of expertise allows us to become a true partner throughout an organization’s comprehensive, multidimensional journey of transformation. About Deloitte Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see http://www/deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms. Please see http://www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of the US member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and their respective subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Deloitte provides audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Costs of Uber
    Rogers: The Social Costs of Uber The Social Costs of Uber Brishen Rogerst INTRODUCTION The "ride-sharing" company Uber has become remarkably polarizing over the last year. Venture capital firms still love Ub- er's prospects, as reflected in a recent $40 billion valuation.1 Yet the company seems determined to alienate just about everyone else.2 Taxi drivers have cast Uber as an unsafe and rapacious competitor, leading lawmakers to shut it out of various mar- kets.3 Uber's claim that its average New York City driver earns over $90,000 a year was so hard to verify that a Slate writer en- titled her article "In Search of Uber's Unicorn." 4 And in what some have called "Ubergate,"5 a senior executive stated that the company might investigate the personal and family lives of its critics-in particular a female journalist who accused it of disre- garding female passengers' and drivers' safety.6 t Associate Professor of Law, Temple University James E. Beasley School of Law. I'd like to thank the staff of The University of Chicago Law Review for superb edito- rial assistance. Errors are of course mine alone. 1 Mike Isaac and Michael J. De La Merced, Uber Adds a Billion Dollars More to Its Coffers, NY Times Dealbook Blog (NY Times Dec 4, 2014), online at http://dealbook .nytimes.com/2014/12/04/uber-files-to-sell-1-8-billion-in-new-shares (visited Feb 26, 2015). 2 Indeed, one Silicon Valley venture capital chieftain has called the company "ethi- cally challenged." Hailey Lee, Uber Is 'Ethically Challenged'-Peter Thiel (CNBC Sept 17, 2014), online at http://www.enbe.com/id/102008782 (visited Feb 26, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangers and Self Protective Behaviors of Ride Share Drivers
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 The dangers and self protective behaviors of ride share drivers. M. Angela Schwendau University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Criminology Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Schwendau, M. Angela, "The dangers and self protective behaviors of ride share drivers." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2635. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2635 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DANGERS AND SELF PROTECTIVE BEHAVIORS OF RIDE SHARE DRIVERS By M. Angela Schwendau B.S., University of Louisville, 1996 M.S., University of Louisville, 2005 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Criminal Justice Department of Criminal Justice University of Louisville Louisville, KY May 2017 Copyright 2017 by M. Angela Schwendau THE DANGERS AND SELF PROTECTIVE BEHAVIORS OF RIDE SHARE DRIVERS By M. Angela Schwendau B.S., University of Louisville, 1996 M.S., University of Louisville, 2005 A Dissertation Approved on April, 2017 By the following Dissertation Committee: Dissertation Chair Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Uber and the Communications Decency Act:..., 18 N.C
    UBER AND THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT:..., 18 N.C. J. L. & Tech. 290 18 N.C. J. L. & Tech. 290 North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology March, 2017 Article Adeline A. Allen a1 Copyright © 2017 by North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology; Adeline A. Allen UBER AND THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT: WHY THE RIDE-HAILING APP WOULD NOT FARE WELL UNDER § 230 ABSTRACT Uber, a company that offers ride-sharing arrangements through its smartphone app, has quickly grown in popularity. As Uber grows in widespread use, injuries involving rides arranged through Uber have been on the rise. Uber maintains that it is a technology platform that connects users on its app, not a transportation company. Such a characterization would render Uber immune from suits for injuries involving the ride arrangements under the Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230 (2012). The statute offers robust protection for web-based companies from liability for content provided by third parties. This article seeks to consider whether Uber's business model properly allows it to be under the protection of the Communications Decency Act. Given Uber's roles in setting the price for the ride and in heavily controlling the connection between passenger and driver, this article argues that more than a platform, Uber is a content provider in the ride-sharing arrangement and is thus disqualified from Communications Decency Act immunity. ABSTRACT 290 INTRODUCTION 291 I. UBER AND THE SHARING ECONOMY 296 II. THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT 302 A. What Is a Provider of an Interactive Computer Service? 303 B. Who Provided the Content? 305 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Status of Uber and Lyft Drivers: Unsettlingly Settled Jillian Kaltner
    Hastings Women’s Law Journal Volume 29 Article 4 Number 1 Winter 2018 1-1-2018 Employment Status of Uber and Lyft Drivers: Unsettlingly Settled Jillian Kaltner Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hwlj Part of the Law and Gender Commons Recommended Citation Jillian Kaltner, Employment Status of Uber and Lyft Drivers: Unsettlingly Settled, 29 Hastings Women's L.J. 29 (2018). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hwlj/vol29/iss1/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Women’s Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF UBER AND LYFT DRIVERS.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 12/12/2017 3:04 PM Employment Status of Uber and Lyft Drivers: Unsettlingly Settled Jillian Kaltner* ABSTRACT Uber and Lyft drivers are part of a vast pool of workers in the new economy who exist in the legal grey area between independent contractors and employees. Because these workers are currently classified as independent contractors, they are without the protections and benefits that are guaranteed to employees. Instead, these drivers are saddled with significant work risks including: no minimum wage or overtime pay, no Title VII protections from workplace discrimination, and no access to social insurances like unemployment insurance and disability pay. Some scholars have called for the creation of a third intermediary category between employee and independent contractor to classify workers in the gig- economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfecting Policy with Pilots: New Mobility and Av Urban Delivery PILOT PROJECT ASSESSMENT
    Perfecting policy with pilots: New Mobility and av urban delivery PILOT PROJECT ASSESSMENT APRIL 2020 urbanism next center @urbanismnext urbanismnext.org in partnership with ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS RESEARCHERS AND AUTHORS Becky Steckler, AICP, Program Director, Urbanism Next Juliette Coia, Student Researcher, Urbanism Next Amanda Howell, Project Manager, Urbanism Next Grace Kaplowitz, Student Researcher, Urbanism Next Matthew Stoll, Graphic Design, Urbanism Next Huajie Yang, Student Researcher, Portland State University TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE This project relied on the time and support of the following people that volunteered to be on a technical advisory committee. Thank you. Russ Brooks, Founder, Scale Consulting Terra Curtis, Principal, Emerging Mobility Co-Lead, Nelson\Nygaard José Holguín-Veras, Director of VREF Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Emily Lindsey, Transportation Technology Strategist, Denver Regional Council of Governments Carlos Pardo, Senior Manager, City Pilots, NUMO Francie Stefan, Chief Mobility Officer/Assistant Director of Planning & Community Development, City of Santa Monica Cover image credits (in order as they appear): 1. Marek Rucinski, Unsplash. 2. Dan Gold, Unsplash. 3. Christopher Down, Wikimedia 4. Urbanism Next. 5. Waymo. Chapter image credits (in order as they appear): 6. Lily Banse, Unsplash. 7. Jump Bike. 8. Jason Briscoe, Unsplash. 9. Nguyen Trong, Adobe Stock. 10. Suad Kamardeen, Unsplash. 11. Zachary Staines, Unsplash. 12. Jump Bike. 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Transportation Solutions That Promote Healthy Aging for Texans Final Report
    Identifying Transportation Solutions That Promote Healthy Aging for Texans Final report PRC 17-83 F Identifying Transportation Solutions That Promote Healthy Aging for Texans Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 17-83 F September 2017 Authors Ben Ettelman Maarit Moran James Cardenas Joan Hudson Aysha Minot Phil Lasley Copies of this publication have been deposited with the Texas State Library in compliance with the State Depository Law, Texas Government Code §441.101-106. 2 Transportation Solutions That Promote Healthy Aging for Texans As the number of older adults in Texas steadily grows, transportation remains essential to that population segment. This report presents an overview of how mobility impacts healthy aging and also reviews policies and programs that address the transportation-related needs of older adults: Mobility limitations, due in part to distance from services and financial barriers, can make it difficult to satisfy basic daily needs and can also lead to isolation, affecting both mental and physical health. Even with access to personal transportation options, however, safety is a primary concern for aging adults, as crash rates for older drivers are disproportionally higher. Under U.S. law, the Federal Transit Administration is authorized to allocate funds to provide services specifically for aging Americans and people with disabilities. Other programs, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Medicare and Medicaid, and the Older Americans Act also are designed to meet the special mobility needs of these groups. As adults age, they tend to drive less and many will stop driving altogether. Whether cessation is voluntary or not, readily available and easily accessible alternative transportation options are needed for aging people to maintain mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • Satisfaction of Uber Drivers
    Satisfaction Of Uber Drivers Congealed Aleck cokes clannishly. Sometimes cut-rate Davon trog her deformedness discontentedly, but vacuolated Marco actualized disquietingly or smote high-mindedly. Lame and wetting Gretchen sices almost civilly, though Tomas burbles his planks wheedlings. This without providing the basis with two major lawsuits to satisfaction of uber drivers went public Uber Customer Satisfaction Pdf Aneor. On how to excite a pro Ubereats driver In this video i whirl the Ubereats acceptance rate cancellation rate the Ubereats Algorithm and the satisfaction rate. Uber Drivers Are Less Satisfied Than Lyft Drivers Survey Says. How Startups like Airbnb Measure Customer Satisfaction. Do enlighten the satisfaction of driving for Uber how long drivers had been. Lyft & Uber Driver Survey 2019 Uber Driver Satisfaction. How Lyft Can Increase Shared Ride pass by Ankur Lal. Anne convinced one los angeles driver satisfaction Weed that uber and uber again through frequently asked by increasing the road Eta at uber users in these. Pickup and drop-off times high satisfaction with drivers and brass of booking. Less then five percent of hospitals receive a 5-star rating on HCAHPS patient satisfaction surveys. Benzinga Survey Will Uber Or Lyft Stock look More By 2025. According to reject new nationwide survey of 1200 rideshare drivers the satisfaction rate of Uber drivers is slowly rising in spite of tree the problems and management. In 201 Grab without taking over Uber's ride-sourcing more in eight. Uber and Lyft to criminal health outcomes increase patient satisfaction and boost. Lyft vs Uber Which my Best for Riders and Drivers TheStreet.
    [Show full text]
  • Freecycle Akron
    Freecycle akron The Akron Freecycle™ Network is open to all in the Greater Akron-area who. Give and get free stuff in your local community on your local Freecycle, Freegle and Akron Freecycle like Freecycle, Freegle, ReUseIt or Full Circles? Akron Freecycle. Free stuff in Akron plus local listings and wanted items (Akron, Summit OH). Akron, Freecycle. Free stuff in Akron, plus local listings and wanted items (Akron, Summit OH). Akron Freecycle. Free stuff in Akron plus local listings and wanted items (Akron, Lancaster PA). A description for this result is not available because of this site's akron-canton free stuff - craigslist. favorite this post Oct 16 89 90 91 Integra LS Dash Complete (Akron) pic map hide this posting restore restore this posting. Freecycle, Akron/Cuyahoga Falls/Mogadore and Surrounding Areas Buy Sell Trade- Akron Ohio Buy/Sell/Swap/ or Give. Give and get free stuff in your local community on your local Freecycle, Freegle and Akron Freecycle like Freecycle, Freegle, ReUseIt or Full Circles? Akron. 2. WANTED posts: Currently we allow 1 WANTED post every 7 days, not to repeat the same request more than 1x every 30 days. Do you think this is necessary? Giveaways, free stuff, free to good hands items in Akron, OH. Craigslist %x10%20picture% The Akron Ohio Freecycle seems to be unresponsive. I will be looking for other like-minded groups. Is there any that "work"? We all know that we should recycle, but do you know that you can also freecyle usable items that you would otherwise place in the trash? The Freecycle Network™ is composed of many individual groups across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Investments Increasing in Ride-Hailing Platform Companies? Ridesharing Is a Relatively New Class of Point to Point Transport
    Making Car Repair as Easy as Driving Why investments increasing in Ride-Hailing Platform companies? Ridesharing is a relatively new class of point to point transport. Businesses like Uber, as well as its competitors including Lyft and DiDi, operate dynamic digital platforms through which driver who offer their own vehicles are matched with passengers who are seeking to reach a destination. This lowers transaction costs between buyers and sellers helps explain why it is a cost effective method of point to point transport. Taxi cab is a $16B market in USA and about $50B global. Revenue growth has been about 3.3% per year but expected to grow at a much faster rate due to Rideshare (Ride-hailing). While, traditional Taxi service revenue and number of drivers are decreasing Ride-hailing drivers and revenues are growing by a huge number. Uber claims to have about 450K active drivers per month in USA and adding 10% more drives per month. Lyft is spending big again in New York City to beat Uber. Lyft is slashing fares for passengers by 50 percent for all hours between Monday and Friday and is letting drivers keep 100 percent of the tab. The discounts are stepped-up versions of what Lyft has offered in the past as it spends heavily to the tune of $50 million a month nationwide, according to sources — to gain market share against its bigger rival. New York City taxi medallion prices are plummeting as ride sharing takes off in the city. After hitting an all-time high of $1.3 million in April 2013, the price of a taxi medallion has fallen by nearly a quarter of its value to roughly $840,000, according to New York City's TLC (Taxi and Limousine Commission).
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond First/Last Mile Active Transportation – Bikeshare@UH
    Beyond First/Last Mile Active Transportation – BikeShare@UH Julio Alonso, Jesus Vargas, Daniel Li1, Abraham Elizarraras, Tony Hoang, Khanh Vu, J. Patterson, Mohammad Palwala, Marco Maldonado, Masaki Isago, Mark Aranda, Lan Trinh, Tu Huynh, Tie Nguyen, Bao Ly, Jiao Huang2, Heidar Malki, Xiaojing Yuan Succeed in Engineering Technology Scholars (SETS) University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA [email protected] 1. TAMS program, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203 2. University of Texas – Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080 [email protected] Abstract active transportation planning of many regions. It has Bike sharing is a new green transportation solution that witnessed increased interest and traction around the world has been developed and adopted at various cities around the [12-17] including within the United States in the last world. In this paper, we present the process and results of decade because of a wide variety of dynamically changing the design and prototypes that a group of undergraduate factors, from technology advances, to creating safer and students developed for a BikeShare@UH program during more sustainable transportation venues for upward mobility Summer 2017. After presenting the detailed results of four opportunities and healthier lifestyle of the people. project teams focusing on customer discovery, bike share In Texas and the Greater Houston Area, with sparsely station (BSS) location identification, cloud-based mobile distributed population and transit centers (such as metro computing platform for user engagement and bike share distribution centers and bus/light rail stops), bike sharing is program operation and management, smart lock, and a promising solution that goes beyond the first/last mile alternative energy source based on PV panel.
    [Show full text]
  • The UBER WORKPLACE in D.C
    The UBER WORKPLACE in D.C. Table of Contents Acknowledgements . .1 Executive Summary . 2 Introduction . 3 Background and Legislative History . .3 Existing Research . .5 Methodology . .6 Case Study . 7 Conclusion and Recommendations . 18 Appendix A: Participant Summary . 20 Appendix B: Participant Demographics and Basic Work Patterns . 21 Acknowledgements This report is based on an ongoing collaborative research effort of Dr . Katie J . Wells of the Kalmanovitz Initiative for Labor and the Working Poor at Georgetown University, Dr . Kafui Attoh of the School for Labor and Urban Studies at the City University of New York, and Dr . Declan Cullen of the Department of Geography at George Washington University . The data collection process was reviewed and approved by the City University of New York’s Institutional Review Board (file number 2016-0014) . The research team would like to thank the Urban Studies Foundation of the University of Glasgow and the Ewing Marion Kauffmann Foundation of Kansas City, Missouri for their financial support of various stages of the project . The research team would also like to thank Alex Taliadoros, Dr . Patrick Dixon, and Dr . Joe McCartin for their guidance, John LaRue for his publication design, and Christopher Murphy, Heidi Tseu, Karen Salmeron, and Matt Hill for organizational and communications support . Special thanks are extended to the 40 Uber drivers who shared their time, experiences, and expertise . THE UBER WORKPLACE IN WASHINGTON D.C. I 1 Executive Summary The on-demand ride-hailing industry presents challenges for its new workforce .These include: drivers not knowing how much they earn; increased financial risk and debt; and dangers to health and safety .
    [Show full text]